Which camera to buy

Hi,
I wanna buy a new camera and i'm thinking about one of these 3:
Canon PowerShot SX260
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-Digital-Stabilized-Wide-Angle/dp/B0075SUK14/ref=cm_cr_pr_produ...
Canon PowerShot SX500
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-Wide-Angle-Stabilized-3-0-Inch/dp/B00908BMVE/ref=cm_cr_pr_prod...
Nikon COOLPIX S9200
http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-COOLPIX-Digital-Camera-NIKKOR/dp/B009SE6KPI/ref=zg_bs_330405011_2
I'm not an advanced (not even a beginner) photographer, I want a solid camera, good zoom, good quality, hd video and light to carry around.
Plus,I want it to have enough advanced features having the possibility of using them in the near future.
The most important thing is quality of photos, day&night, and probably ease of use.
Other recommendation would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks

Surprisingly, the SX260 has better specs than the SX500 pretty much all around, and in a smaller package.  The one area where the SX500 looks to shine is macro - which is funny, because that's usually where point and shoots shine.  I'd say it's a fairly easy call between those two.
SX260 vs the Nikon looks a bit more complicated.  Looks like each is suited a bit more toward certain types of photography.  The Canon looks significantly better in video, the Nikon has a faster burst rate, smaller package and cheaper.  Sensors are going to be about the same.
More importantly, what is your budget, and how important is minimizing cost (i.e. would you select a camera with a few less features if it saved you $100?

Similar Messages

  • Saving data to external hard drive and which camera to buy?

    Hi everyone! I'm getting started with my editing and shooting in the next few days and I had a couple questions.
    1. If I want to save all my date to an external hard drive, so that it wont take up space on my MacBook Pro, how do I change the pathing so it'll save on the external and not the Macbook.
    2. I have 1000 to spend on a camera. I know a 3CCD, mini-dv with an external mic output is best, so what's a good camera considering? The Canon XL2, GL2...? If anyone has any suggestions, let me know!
    Thank you so much, looking forward to contributing to this community!
    -Ro

    I looked on eBay and saw that you can get a used GL2 for under $1000. I have a GL1 and like it very much. I capture to a second internal HD so I don't have any connection problems. With a MBP I recommend an external drive connected by Firewire as you are planning.
    I see on this forum some people have had trouble with Canon cameras on a Firewire port shared with other devices. As a test I tried connecting my GL1 to my external backup drive through a second Firewire connector (I believe that's called daisy chaining) and I had no problem with FCE recognizing my camera by switching to the "Basic" Easy Set Up setting.
    In the System Settings you can set where you want to save your files.

  • Which camera should I buy for a first timer

    Hello everyone. This is my first post here. I am a 22 year old student at a college majoring in electronics and communications. Soon as am done with college am moving to a film school to learn about filmmaking. However, right now am educating myself with filmography and video shots by reading books. The only thing left for me is buying a camera. Which camera do you guys recommend me buy for a first timer ? Same thing with accessories. My budget is 1000 USD
    Many people in other forums recommened the Canon T3i
    Do you guys think I shoud start with a camcorder or a DSLR for a starter who wants to learn filmography?

    This is a slightly complicated question.
    A camcorder is specifically designed for video.  But a DSLR camera is designed for still image and can also shoot video.
    But there is one reason why video users are extremely interested in DSLRs... and that has to do with the lenses.
    There's a massive number of lenses available for DSLR cameras on the market.  For many camcorders, you lens isn't removeable -- the lens it comes with is all you get.  For those with removeable lenses, the selection is limited and they tend to be expensive (economies of scale).  If you want to draw a viewer's attention to a subject by using selective focus, then you'd want a narrow depth of field and draw to the focus to your object of interest within the frame... there are many lenses for DSLR cameras that can do that.  But with a camcorder, your ability to create strong out-of-focus areas is more limited due to the lenses.
    So... apart from the lenses (but that's a _really_ big deal), just about everything else about a camcorder is better for shooting video.
    When displaying video digitally, a 1080p image is 1920x1080 -- or about 2 megapixels.  All the recent Rebel bodies can record 18 megapixel images (for still photos).  This means the camera has to resample the image for video purposes.  The sensor wasn't really designed for that non-stop extended recording use and it can get hot.  Hot can mean noise in the image.  Camcorders are designed for extended recording and tend to not get hot.  
    Watch any high-end film and count the number of seconds before you see the camera angle change.  You'll likely notice that the angle is changing faster than every 10-15 seconds.  It changes all the time.  A 30 second clip would be _really_ long.  They tend to take lots of short clips and weave them together to make a story.  The need to shoot a birthday party whilst walking around with a camera for 20 or 30 minutes in one really really long clip just isn't done in a pro video world.
    If you do decide to go with a DSLR, I'd nudge you toward the T5i because of it's hybrid AF system and ability to exploit full-time auto-focus (although in pro video you may find yourself doing manual focus more often then you might guess) with the silent focus motors of the new STM lenses that are so quiet the in-camera microphone cannot detect any noise from them.
    The 70D also promises to be a very good camera for video but has not yet started shipping (pre-orders are available) -- but it's also out of your price range.
    Tim Campbell
    5D II, 5D III, 60Da

  • Which Web Cam To Buy?

    I am ready to purchase a webcam, but am not sure which one to buy. Here's my situation. I have a utility building attached to my house that our dogs use. I would like to put a web cam in that small utility building and point it down towards the floor so I can see my dogs. This room can get dusty from the dogs. I do have one 20V power outlet. I may be able to run a data wire (i.e. CAT5 or USB) to the building if needed, however it would take about 75 feet of cable. I want to be able to see my dogs when it's daylight and when it's night. Some light comes in through a window from an exterior light so it's not totally dark, just dim at night. I want a good quality color image, prefer full motion video, prefer 640 X 480 or better but don't really need sound. I also want to be able to stream this to the internet so I can see what's happening from work or while we are on vacation. I would like to spend less than $75.
    1) What webcam models would you recommend?
    2) If I can run a data cable to the dog building, which is better/easier USB or CAT5?
    3) Is there anything else I should consider?Thanks...

    II got the creative live wireless it comes with a usb cam I think it's a creative live which I believe has the cmos sensor (the cheep one of the two kinds) and it works ok outside but the automatic speed and light does not seem to work. Every day I must unplug the server part of the cam and when I plug it back in then it usually sets the speed and light right but I must keep adjusting the brightness to view it .if they fix this with a firmware update that fixes the automatic video adjustments (and other problems)it would be an affordable cam to view your dogs.

  • Canon EOS-1D X vs. EOS-5D MK III - Which camera do you prefer ?

    Canon has two excellent full frame cameras occupying their higher end of the DSLR market. They are the EOS-1D X and the EOS-5D MK III. I have been using Canon equipment for about 25 years now and started with the EOS-1 series when it first came out in 1989 and the EOS-5 series when it first appeared on the market in 2005.
    I am a Wildlife and Travel photographer and have used both cameras extensively out in the field. The two questions I get asked the most are, which is a better camera and which one do you prefer? My answers are always the same two questions, what type of photography are you shooting and how much do you want to spend? This analysis will not have photos, charts and graphs and assumes the reader is already familiar with Canon equipment. It will get straight to the point on my opinion of the two cameras from the viewpoint of a photographer out on photo shoots.
    First, let us compare the major specs of the two cameras, EOS-1D X vs. EOS-5D MK III :
    Sensor Resolution :  18.1 MP  vs.  22.3 MP
    ISO Sensitivity :  100 - 204800  vs. 100 - 102400
    Processors :  Dual DIGIC 5+ and 1 DIGIC 4  vs.  One DIGIC 5+
    Recording Media :  Two CF slots  vs.  One CF and One SD slot
    Viewfinder :  0.76X  vs.  0.71X
    Burst Rate :  14 fps  vs.  6 fps
    Autofocus :  61-AF points  vs.  61-AF points
    Cycle Count :  400,000  vs.  150,000
    DxOMark Sensor Score :  Overall - 82  vs.  81
    Low Light Performance :  2786 ISO  vs.  2293 ISO
    Weight and Dimension :  6.2 x 6.4 x 3.3 @ 3.37 lbs  vs.  6.0 x 4.6 x 3.0 @ 2.1 lbs.
    List price :  $6,799  vs.  $3,499
    Both cameras are excellent performers out in the field. The 1D X is completely weather sealed and can stand up to most conditions. AF is lighting fast and high ISO performance are superb and as you can see from the specifications above, they are almost evenly matched in performance but the EOS-1D X edges out the EOS-5D MK III in Sensor Score, Low Light Performance, burst rate and cycle count, while the 5D MK III has an edge in pixel count. So, going back to the original questions posed to me :
    Q : Which is a better camera ?
    A : They are both great cameras in their own right. If you are primarily a Wildlife photographer, the obvious choice is the EOS-1D X. It comes through for me under extreme conditions with little fuss and stands up to harsh use but if you are into Portrait and Landscape photography, the higher megapixel count in the 5D MK III will allow a slightly more robust cropping and lends itself to very big photo prints.
    Q : Which camera do you prefer ?
    A : If I were strictly a Landscape or Portrait photographer, I will pick the EOS-5D MK III. A photographer shooting both Wildlife and Landscape/Travel will do better with the EOS-1D X.
    Q : Which camera is the better value (price dependent) ?
    A : Without a doubt, I have picked the EOS-5D MK III as the best value in full frame DSLR camera on the market today.
    Q : Which is a better camera, overall ?
    A : Without another doubt, the EOS-1D X excels in all categories but at a price some may not want to, or cannot afford. Good, used ones will appear on the market eventually.
    Q : Which camera would you buy (price dependent) ?
    A : The Canon EOS-1D X represents the pinnacle of Canon's camera technology. There is really no substitute to shoot with the latest 1D. The performance, feel and ruggedness of the camera exudes confidence. I have not bought the EOS-5D MK III because I still own the original 5D and I have the EOS-1Ds MK III as well. So, there is little room in my equipment bag for another full frame camera but the price of the 5D MK III is now down to $2,600 on eBay (limited quantity) and is tempting me by the day.
    For full details on each camera's specifications, visit the Canon USA website. For a detailed analysis on the EOS-1D X, visit this page. You can visit MichaelDanielHo.com to see photos taken with all the cameras.

    I went through the same drill - came down to $3300 extra for 14 vs 6 fps.  I bought the 5DIII.

  • Converting to DNG - which Camera Raw compatiabilty and why?

    When converting camera Raw files in Lightroom 2.5, a dialog box asks which Camera Raw/Photoshop version I want to make DNG file compatible with.   (See my screengrab below) I understand why Adobe made different vesions of Camera Raw and stopped supporting older versions (so users would buy the upgrades of Photoshop and Lightroom).  The question I ask.. Does a DNG file created to be compatible with Camera Raw 5.4 have superior qualities/algorithms/technical mumbo jumbo/ finese /or what not over a DNG file created to be compatible with Camera Raw 2.4 and later?
    Seems sort of silly to not use the 2.4 setting if 5.4 has no advantage (other than keeping older versions of Photoshop and Lightroom from opening it ).
    What is the scoop?

    Camera Raw does evolve over time. There are changes to the rendering algorithms. Additionally, new camera support is added with each new iteration of Camera Raw. The older versions are offered so that if you are still using older versions of Camera Raw and Photoshop you can generate compatible DNG files.
    If you are using current versions then I suggest you choose the most current version in the dialog box. If you are still working under ACR 4.6 then choose that. It's there so you aren't "forced" to buy upgrades to PS and LR.

  • What Video camera to buy?

    I am working with a not for profit group who is interested in putting some videos about members of the group as part of telling it's history.
    I am considering buying a consumer camera, probably HD, and am wondering which camera's work well in this situation.I suspect that we will also be using some Sony studio camera footage if that makes a difference.
    Thanks

    I am no expert so I'll just tell you what works for me and what doesn't.
    AVCHD as I've experience with my Panasonic HDC-SD9 absolutely *****! There is not better way to put it. The compression fragments are like a JPG compressed to leass than 40%. Also, the video cam ***** for low light, so anything I've done in low light has been unusable between the grain the fragments.
    Now, as sad as it is, with my $1000 video camera sitting doing nothing, I have found my new love. My Canon SD960 IS. It does 720P video and it is nice. I've watched it directly off the camera on a 52" LCD and it was very nice. I'm guess that for what you are doing this might be a good choice. Not only does this camera do great video, it aslo take great pictures! After all, it's a camera that takes video, not the other way around.
    Seriously, video on these devices (cameras) has gotten really good for general consumer use and it works for me for the most important thing in my life, my daughter (16 months now).
    Do youself a favor and avoid AVCHD like the plague!
    I won't even go into the nightmare I had editing, or even getting a computer good enough to edit AVCHD.
    Curse Panasonic Video and HP Computer hardware. Curse you both!

  • Which camera will work best with the MAC? NIKON or Canon

    Contemplating on buy a camera and a MAC, but need to know which camera will work best with a MAC, Nikon or Canon? Any info is appreciated

    Both will work very well. You might not even need to install the software that comes with them because they'll probably work fine with iPhoto etc. Before you buy a camera, check this list of cameras supported by OS X:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3825
    Just about all Nikon and Canon cameras are on that list. If a camera is so new it is not yet on that list, it will be in the next update, probably.
    That list is for raw format compatibility. If your camera also shoots JPEG, it will work with a Mac even if it's not on that list. If a camera doesn't work by plugging in a cable, take the card out and put it in an ordinary USB card reader and the Mac will read it.
    Nikon has a slight advantage in that it supports a mode that lets the Mac mount a camera like a disk on the desktop. Canons don't mount on the desktop, but it's not really a disadvantage, because Canons still work great with Apple iPhoto, Apple Aperture, Apple Image Capture, and Adobe apps, and all of those are more efficient ways of transferring photos than dragging them out manually.

  • New-B!  Which camcorder to buy?

    Hello all. Totally new to this forum and to video editing. I have a clean slate and am trying to figure out which camcorder to buy this weekend and was hoping for some help. What I'm looking for is good quality video (doesn't have to be great, but solid) that I can easily import to iMovie 08 and then edit with either of my computers and export the finished product to the Web, or burn to DVD using iDVD. I've been doing a lot of reading and it seems that I could have trouble with some cameras using my G5 as it is not Intel powered, so I would like to stay away from those. I'm not needing to do anything professional with this, just something that is good quality, easy to use, compatible with iMovie 08 and iDVD, and is under $1000. I would consider buying an HD Camcorder while understanding that I have to film/export in a non-HD format until I get FC down the road. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks so much

    I did have a problem with Canon repair service during the first year when I bought one of their camcorders several years ago. The on-start-off switch started being intermittent after only 4-5 months and got worse from there. Canon wouldn't do the repair, as their guarantee said, and wanted to charge me a high price to do it. I operated using the remote for a long while. The camera finally wouldn't turn on at all and became totally useless.
    Needless to say, I haven't purchased another Canon product since that time. Since then, I went to other makes and have spent quite a bit on both still digital cameras and, very recently now, a camcorder by Sony (HDR-HC9). I stay with the miniDV tapes for both quality and convenience purposes, and also found that I had to revert to iMovie HD (vs 6, rather than iMovie 8) in order to properly edit my videos. So far, I really like my results with the HDR-HC9 - and iMovie 6.
    Incidentally, I now only purchase fine camera equipment from very well established local dealers who specialize in camera equipment rather than the big box electronic supply house where I purchased the Canon. The largest camera dealer in Atlanta told me that Canon should certainly have done the repair for me and that Canon would have - if I had purchased it from that dealer. They said that they have such a large volume that they easily pressure such camera makers to uphold their guarantees since Canon wants them to continue selling their product.
    I went from a very strong preference for Canon to the opposite. The big box electronic supply house simply said it was between me and Canon and that they wouldn't help at all. So, "good price" is not at all necessarily "good deal". Besides, the good sellers will now generally try to meet the best internet prices.
    Good luck.
    So time has passed, but these are lessons that, at least, this one person has learned by experience. Hopefully, Canon may have corrected their problems in their service department by this time. But, I don't feel inclined to test them again myself.

  • Which one to buy N73, N91

    Hi Friends,
    I am planning to buy new handset, so please help me to buy handset which is problem free and has a good features.Message Edited by nitinminch on 30-Jan-2007
    02:11 PM

    The answer is rather critical.
    I saw many gave their comments and or suggessions.
    I thank BABDI first of all to clear the fact that N70 is the stablest-its sad but true
    [are y still angry with me?].
    I also give a 5 out of 10 to PETRIB for explaining his weakness in nicer screen display.
    Sorry Mr. LOL [Roberth], I cannot agree with y much regarding this situation.
    Mr fatc, thank y too for yr informative yet outdated info [dont mind].
    First of all this guy mentioned:which one to buy:N91 or N73?
    Secondly he expressed that he wants less problem with good features.
    But lol, he should also mention that what type of mobile user he is: does he need all in one or specifically music becoz N73 has all-in-all [except wi-fi] but N91 is basically on music.
    My answer is N91-1 [WiFi] or N91 8 GIG.
    Because:
    1.N91 now is released with 2.10.013 which is much trouble free and N91 8 GIG is with 3.00.xxx which is not bad.
    2.It has better than IPOD sound with very Good FM Radio
    3.its size is either 4 gig or 8 gig.
    4.I know y ve heard about the HDD factors but if y carefully maintain the 19 tips from ohgizmodos and tips and guides from support section of this website I CAN BET Y FEEL LESS TROUBLE AND ENJOY GOOD FEATURES.
    But if yr focus is only on camera [so called 3 MPix] and nicer screen with BUNCH OF TALENT BUGS y may go for N73 or N73 ME-no one will restrict you.

  • How to install Windows 8.1 Enterprise on Ultrabook which came with basic Windows 8.1

    Hi,
    I guess I'm not the first one with this question but anyway...
    I've got 2000EUR expensive Ultrabook recently, and what's interesting it came with Windows 8.1. Just standard basic Windows 8.1, not Pro or Enterprise.
    Obviously I needed to upgrade it with larger SSD 1Tb and install Windows 8.1 Enterprise as I need Hyper-V and other Enterprise version functionality on day to day bases.
    I was surprised that I can't do so as SLIC is reverting Windows 8.1 back to basics!!!
    .. so my question is - How can I can Windows 8.1 Enterprise 64Bit on to very expensive Ultrabook which came with Windows 8.1?!?!
    Kind Regards,
    Kon

    Hi,
    Enterprise edition of Windows Client OS, is not available via OEM and not via Retail - it's only available via Volume Licensing agreement.
    you can purchase an upgrade to Pro, via the Microsoft Store:
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-au/windows-8/feature-packs
    Don
    (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
    This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

  • I have two iphone one is iphone 5 and othere is iphone 4 . can i use same id for both ? And do i have to purchase the application again for iphone 4 which i have buyed for iphone 5.??

    i have two iphone one is iphone 5 and othere is iphone 4 . can i use same id for both ? And do i have to purchase the application again for iphone 4 which i have buyed for iphone 5.??

    You can use the same Apple ID for both phones, you would then be able to use the purchased Apps/Content on both phones without having to pay again.

  • 1. I have an iPod which has purchases synced with I tunes with an apple ID. I now have an iPad with a new ID for cloud. I have cloud storage capacity of 5gb which came with the iPad. How can I use one ID and store my existing music in cloud?

    1. I have an iPod which has purchases synced with I tunes with an apple ID. I now have an iPad with a new ID for cloud. I have cloud storage capacity of 5gb which came with the iPad. How can I use one ID and store my existing music in cloud?

    HI Frostyfrog
    CHeck out iTunes Match which has an annual fee of £21 or thereabouts. You can store a maximum of 25,000 songs there and they all become available on your other kit, iPhone, iPad and iPod. I know it works as I have over 23000 songs uploaded of which only a few we're bought through iTunes.
    it works by comparing your music to the whole iTunes music dadata base so you access the same tunes that you could get from iTunes. If you have obscure stuff, it uploads your own music to the cloud as a copy.
    I Find it incredible that on my iPhone with its 16gb memory I can view almost 200 gb of music (ie my 23000 songs) and play any of them. Anything I add to iTunes becomes available via the cloud fairly quickly from a few minutes or a little longer if adding a lot.
    The first time you use it it will take quite a while to match your music if you have a lot, but after that it is all automatic. Read the stuff on the apple site. Your PC needs to be at least running Vista. I recommend it and at less than 50p a week it's good value.
    Good luck

  • How to config a new remote on apple tv (first generation). I have lost my remote which came with the apple tv

    How to config a new remote on apple tv (first generation). I have lost my remote which came with the apple tv.

    Do you mean you've replaced your remote and it wont work because your AppleTV is paired to your lost remote?
    If so, http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1555 has you covered.

  • I bought a MBPro which came with Lion installed,i also wanted to have a copy of installation disc so i used mac app store.Normally if an app is already bought there is a warning or a sign that informs the buyer.I've charged for this download is it normal?

    Hi ,i bought a MacBookPro which came with Lion installed on it (i have registered my mac book pro right after i bought it), i also wanted to have a copy of the installation disc in case of a crash, so i used mac app store to get it.Normally if an app is already bought (for iphone app store) there is a warning or a sign that informs the buyer, than the app store lets the buyer to re-download/re-install the app.I've charged for this download afterwards, because i was using virtual credit card, there was not enough money transferred to that card during that download but the app store let me download it anyway. I haven't charged before the download, the app store first let me to download it then it requested that amount of money for next download wich it was a free app. Can anybody enlight me? thanks

    Hi ...
    i also wanted to have a copy of the installation disc in case of a crash
    If you have problems with your Mac you use Lion Recovery
    However, you can create your own installation disc >  How to create an OS X Lion installation disc | MacFixIt - CNET Reviews
    Since Lion came pre installed on your Mac, the App Store doesn't not recognize that as a purchase so you if you want to re download Lion to create a boot disk you will have to pay for it. You can then re download Lion on all your authorized Macs for free.

Maybe you are looking for