Which is better? More Ram or bigger HD?

I am buying a new 13" macbook pro. I can get $100 student discount. So I was gonna either add 4gb ram for $90 or 320 gb harddrive for $90. I can only afford one of them though. Which one is more benificial? I don't need tons of storage space. Right now on my current computer I am using 74.63GB of my harddrive. Please help me decide. Thank you.

Ok. I will be using it for normal everyday use. But in addtion to that. I am going to be working in pro tools 8 for studio recording stuff. Just for a personal recording studio. And also, I will be playing Sims 3. So if the ram is better for performance, then I might want that thinking of those two programs.

Similar Messages

  • Speed up iMac mid 2010: more RAM or bigger hard drive?

    My mid 2010 21.5" iMac is getting really slow. granted it only has 4GB of RAM and 500GB of hard drive with barely 10GB left.
    So the simple question: do I add more RAM or get a new hard drive to speed up this old baby?

    tyron1980 wrote:
    He has a lot of files so the author should transfer some of his files to an external HD. Its his prerogative choice if he make some sacrifices in order to have bigger space. Once he has enough free space then he can apply doing partition.
    I'll try again.
    How will making a 2nd partition help this problem, and why would it be needed otherwise.
    Here's the answer.
    IT WON'T, and there is no advantage to multiple partitions withut specific need for them (multiple OS's for example)
    To the OP, please ignore posts from tyron1980

  • Can I install more RAM, and a bigger HD ?

    Dear Mac users:
    i have a black macbook, 2GB of DDR2 RAM, 160GB 5400-rpm HD, 2.16GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor. I use my macbook only for music (Logic Studio). I was wondering if I bring my computer to the apple store, is it possible to upgrade these internal components ? like adding more RAM, a bigger HD, better processor, better sound card maybe. I wanted to buy an iMac G5, or a MacBook Pro, but did not have enough cash. Now that I've had my macbook for a litlle year, and saved some cash, I would really like to invest by upgrading my computer.
    Let me know the solutions I could have.
    Thanks !!
    Roman.

    romektor wrote:
    What do you mean by end users ??
    The memory is easy to upgrade, although you're already at the "official" limit supported by Apple. As was said earlier, 3GB does work as experienced by others.
    The memory is easily upgraded with the only tools needed being a coin (to remove the battery) and a #00 (or #0) Phillips screwdriver to remove the RAM/HD shield. Apple considers the memory a user-upgradeable component. Most reasonably proficient people can do this themselves.
    The hard drive is almost as easy. The removal/installation steps are almost the same as the memory. It requires the two tools I mentioned previously, plus a T8 Torx screwdriver. Previous Apple notebook computers required extensive disassembly and their hard drives weren't considered to be user replaceable.
    The sound and memory aren't generally thought of as something that can be upgraded. Only the most serious hobbyists would even attempt it, and results are unpredictable. Someone with extensive lab experience might attempt it, and even an expert might not get it to all work.
    If I could use car terms, memory and the hard drive in a MacBook are like tires. Just get one in the right size and it's almost guaranteed to be compatible save rare issues. The processor is like an engine. You might try to put in a V8 into an I4 engine bay. It would require a whole lot of work, the results may look really nasty, and it may not even work in the end. It's generally accepted that a used computer with the specs you want would be more cost effective than trying to install a different notebook computer processor in the current box you have.

  • Ok, so i bought a imac 27 about 4 months ago, and now they release a new one!  ****... So my question is, should I sell this one (which by the way is the i5 2.8 with 1 gb 5750 and 4gb ram) and buy the new imac 27 i5,or keep the one i have and buy more ram

    ok, so i bought a imac 27 about 4 months ago, and now they release a new one!  ****... So my question is, should I sell this one (which by the way is the i5 2.8 with 1 gb 5750 and 4gb ram) and buy the new imac 27 i5,or keep the one i have and buy more ram. I mostly use my computer for photoshop cs5 and illustrator cs5 for graphics out put as well as surfing the web and music.
         Please give me you thoughts on what I should do!!  Thanks  lot!

    The new iMac is about 25% or so faster than your current iMac(comparable model would be the 3.1ghz version). There are a couple of things that you will benefit from such as the dual Thunderbolt/Mini Display ports/ which may help with multitasking. The video card in the new iMac again the comparable model being the 3.1ghz is a lotttttttt better than the current one that you have. So thinking of the long run those few things may be beneficial for you to upgrade(but it depends on what is important to you).
    I had the 2.93ghz i7 version that I just bought in March this year and I turned around and sold it about a week before the new iMac's were announced. I got about $1600 for it, yeah I took a loss but to me it was worth it because my new iMac performs that much better. Now keep in mind I went from i7 to i7...3.4ghz i7 with the 2gb video card. Now I have dual thuderbolt/mini display ports. I have noticed significant gains in my video editing and also in my gaming. So to me it was definitely worth the upgrade!
    One last thing, I would not have sold my 2.93 i7 and then bought the 3.1ghz i5, the big reason is because HT(hyper threading), it's only on the i7 model(3.4ghz)... If you take a look at some of the bench marks on engadget, maclife, macrumors, macworld, ****Barefeats.com(they really get into benchmarking)*** you will see charts that will help you make a better decision.
    In closing I would say look into it, if you can get a good price out of your current iMac to put toward a new iMac then do it. Like others have mentioned to you, tech changes and Apple will change the tech in these machines next year or do a speed bump later this year or so. One last thing if you go from the 2.8 i5 up to the 3.4 i7, you would definitely see the difference (HT is a must especially for programs that utilize it. You can go to my youtube channel(mob1278) and take a look at my geekbench results.... my 2.93 i7 scored around 10500-11000(8gb ram)...my 3.4 i7 scores from 12700-13000 with 4gb ram....so yeah as you can see big difference. Basically the 3.4 i7 would perform similar or just under a 2.4ghz 8core 2010 Mac Pro which runs you about $3500 with no monitor.... it's your money spend it how you want....and Lion is only going to push it even more when it is released!

  • Which is better - Add a dimension or create more members in an existing

    Which is better - Add a dimension or create more members in an existing dimension?
    We are trying to figure out which can give us better performance in terms of calculations and retrieving reports - to add another dimension (entity/country) or add about 500-800 more members in an existing location/division dimension?
    Thank you!

    If you have BSO cube i would recommend to add in the same dimension where as ASO you can add members in a new dimension. Adding a new dimension is like creating a new cube you have to change each and every single calc scripts,report scripts,FR reports,Webforms and your rule files .... all the dependencies has to be changed manually . I think 500 members in the exsting BSO dimension will not impact the calc or retrieval times that much .

  • Which is better? 2.5ghz dual i5 with 16g ram or 2.3 quad i7 with 8g ram?

    Which is better? 2.5ghz dual i5 with 16g ram or 2.3 quad i7 with 8g ram?

    You are welcome!
    If is best to buy from a reputable supplier that actually test RAM in Mac's and guarantee there upgrade kits.
    The two most recommended here are OWC and Crucial

  • FCP 7 and X, which is much more better(or professional)?

      Who can tell me: Final Cut Pro 7 & Final Cut Pro X, which is much more better(or professional)(And don't mind the price pls.)Thanks!

    Since FCP 7 was discontinued by Apple over 2 years ago, I'd recommend you go with FCP-X, Avid or Premiere Pro.  No sense learning software that isn't supported and will never be updated to work with new video formats.
    -DH

  • Imovie Export Time Better with More RAM ?

    I have an Imac, one before latest release, 3.06 CPU and 2 Gig RAM. A 17 minute video is exporting right now using H.264 and 1920 x 1080 settings and Imovie is telling me that it will take 3 hours. Also, the source video and the exported file are both on an exernal firewire drive (which I know was a mistake).
    Question, if I installed 2 gigs more RAM, would it make a big difference ?

    I'm a strong advocate for maximizing RAM, but It won't shave that much time of the processing. It still takes a long time to process hd. You will feel the RAM while you work and use multiple applications. It will take out the lag. However, becareful on choosing the RAM. A friend of mine went a really inexpensive route and wound up with conflicts and problems. Its not worth the dollar savings...

  • Which is better, many PXI cards or fewer PXI cards with more SCXI cards?

    I have a pretty basic question.  Which is "better", using multiple PXI cards for analog inputs or a single PXI card and multiple SCXI cards?  For example, if I have say 100 channels to sample (all at the same rate), I could use 2 6225s at 80 ch each.  Or I could use 1 6220 and 4 SCXI 1100s (32 ch each).  What are the pros and cons with either approach?  Keep in mind sample rate probably isn't an issue (less than 1 kHz) but it is the same for all channels.
    Thanks.

    The pros/cons will depend on your application now and in the future.  I recommend contacting your local NI sales representative.  Synchronizing across a PXI system is easy to do via the backplane.  There are PXI/SCXI combo chassis available, you could use PXI multifunction DAQ cards and then SCC for signal conditioning for thermocouples for additional functionality later.  There are many possibilities that may be best discussed with your sales representative.
    Regards,
    h_baker
    National Instruments
    Applications Engineer
    Digital Multimeter Resources

  • Which is better Lumia 720 or Lumia 820??????

    Lumia 820 has 1.5 ghz processor, 1gb ram bt doesn't look cool n around 6k more in price, n Lumia 720 has great look, better camera quality (both primary n secondary)  BUTTTTT jus 512 mb ram, 1 Ghz processor,
    so My question is-
    1. Is Lumia 720 slow???
    2. does Lumia 720 hang or something???
    3. Does Lumia 720  lag???
    4. Is it worth to buy Lumia 820 which is a little bit costly Around 6k more in my country)
    "I AM NOT A HUGE GAME OR APP FAN BUT I WANT IF I INSTALL ANY APP OR GAME THEN MY MOBILE SHOULDN'T LAG OR HANG."
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Guys, I am planning to change my phone soon. i am using Nokia E6 for last two years and confotable with its performance. Though I had a bitter experience (you can read my experience HERE) at the begginning, it never came back after rectification done at nokia care. I am happy with its performance now. However, since it has a small screen, sometimes i feel difficult to select a link with finger while surfing through internet. That is the reason i am looking for a new one with bigger screen size. I was actually looking for Lumia 820 or 720 for which I am still confused to decide one. Request the experts to help me to select one. Which is better for my moderate use? i am using my phone mainly for calls, emails, photos and web browsing. I am not curious about games, music etc... Please help me to chose one.

  • Which is better for physical therapy graduate student, a MacBook air or MacBook pro?

    Which is better for a physical therapy graduate student, a MacBook air or MacBook pro?

    Macbook Air
    I cannot see you using strenuous applications to help you with a Physical Therapy Degree.
    Have a think of whether you want an 11" or 13".
    I'd recommend the 13" because although the 11" is perfect for taking notes in class etc.; when it comes to performing as a desktop and not sitting on your lap, it can seem too small.
    The 13" is the best of both worlds. You can keep the portability and the power in one.
    Make sure you get a large enough SSD, they always fill up fast with documents and possibly downloaded text books etc.
    With the 13" if you decide to create a innovative project or a collection of photos, you can also use more RAM-consuming applications like iPhoto and iMovie, or even Aperture without worrying about freezing.

  • Which is better... Sleep or shutdown?

    Which is better for your computer... sleep or shutdown?
    Thanks

    Technically, it doesn´t matter much if you shut your computer down or just put it to sleep., i.e. nothing is more detrimental to your computer´s "well-being" than the other, respectively.
    I´m not sure about the Sleep Mode with the iMac, but I believe it´s a suspend-to-ram, right?
    That would mean any unsaved data isn´t saved and could get lost if the computer fails to wake up from sleep.
    That could be a point against making the computer sleep.
    When it´s sleeping, the computer will also consume a steady, albeit very low quantity of electrical power. From an energy-saving standpoint, that could also be counted as a negative aspect.
    MacBooks and MBPs use suspend-to-disk as sleep mode, which means the contents of the ram is saved onto the hard drive and then the computer is fully turned off. Takes a bit longer than suspend-to-ram.
    I always put my computers to sleep... both my iBook G3 and my Win laptop.
    My win laptop will automatically enter suspend-to-disk after 2 hours if it isn´t used again by then.
    hth
    ibook g3, acer travelmate w/ pentium m 725   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

  • Which is better, a G4-450 Dual or a Mac Mini 1.42?

    which is better in terms of Sequencing and plug in performace, the G4-450 Dual or a Mac Mini 1.42?

    G4-450GHz Dual with 896MB RAM
    Mac Mini 1.42GHz with 1 gig of Ram
    G4-450GHz Dual gets more instances with plugs, more tracks and performance then the 1.4GHz 17" Powerbook, 12" powerbook and Mac Mini which all have the same G4 processor.,
    Today, i took the same 34 track session,
    -all 34 tracks have a Logic Comp, Eq, Gate
    -and also 8 Buses with Comp, EQ, Gates, Delays, Flange, Phasors, Pitch Shifters, 2 Reverbs (1 long and 1 plated) as well as some other toys.
    -Master with Waves Ren Comp, Logic EQ.
    -6 esx24 Instruments with high loads ( Harps, Strings, Cellos, Drums and Perc)
    -8 Long (16 Bar) drum tracks ( Bass, HH, Snare, Toms, Overheads, Fills, Percussion dubs)
    -4 Vocal takes and Dubs (more then 16 Bars long)
    -Bass Track
    -2 Acoustic stereo tracks
    -4 Guitar tracks, dubbs and fills
    -4 Slide Acoustic guitar tracks
    -4 dubbed effect vocal tracks
    AT first, he G4-450GHz Dual choked with 2 errors, then it buffered into the session well and played everything back fine of the same FW drive.
    The mac mini got major problems and only performed 28 tracks with the esx24 tracks frozen, and from time to time after heating up chokes again, i had to wait a few minutes before i bounced the session due to overload errors.
    Over all, Both have G4 Processors and about 1GIG ram (450GHz Dual is under 1 GIG), but its a clear fact that double processors win, even the lowest 450GHz Dual is still hotter then any flashy fast Bused mac mini, powerbook or iMac.

  • Aging g4 just keeps going but is more ram worthwhile?

    I have a g4 that was purchased in 2000. I have never had a problem with it and probably haven't turned it off 50 times since I bought it. My question is that I can't afford a new computer but is it worth putting more RAM in it now in view of it's age? I run heavy apps on it (i.e., adobe and open-source). Currently I have 756 total RAM. My understanding is that with OS X I can go as high as 2GB so is it worth it? I know I have been extremely lucky with how this computer has performed.
    The only other option I might consider is a Mac Mini with 4GB of RAM but everything I've read says that this is not a "production" machine. I am a graphic/web designer so performance is important (yeah, I know, so why am I using a dinosaur?).

    Hi, helloiamamac -
    There's no factual way to answer that question, only opinion.
    When using OS 9, since you already have more than 512MB of RAM, adding more will not help much, as long as you are not running out of RAM under your current usage patterns. If you had less than 512MB, you could see (subjectively) an improvement in OS 9 by adding more. OS 9 can address a max of 1.5GB of RAM.
    If you are using OSX, then adding more can help, specifically by reducing or eliminating the need for the OS to use swap space on the disk (a form of virtual memory). No data is read faster than data in RAM. Although fast processors (which you do not have) can manage swapping data from disks much better, it's still not as fast as reading from RAM. OSX can address a max (on your machine) of 2.0GB of RAM.
    That machine, a G4 (Gigabit Ethernet) model, has four RAM slots (it was the last machine prior to the G4 MDDs which has more than three slots); each slot is rated for a max RAM module size of 512MB. Four of those give the machine's max total of 2.0GB.
    You stated your machine has "756 total RAM" - might that be 768MB instead? 768MB is usually the result of one 512MB module and one 128MB module, although it could also be three 256MB modules (or some other combo of modules). In order to get 2.0GB of RAM in it, the minimum number of 512MB modules you would need is three; the max is four. You would need to balance the cost of those vs. the cost of a newer machine, one with more RAM than you have now.
    By "newer" machine I am suggesting that instead of a brand new machine, you look at ones older than new, but newer than yours. Some of the G4 MDDs are going for good (i.e., low) prices, perhaps even lower than the cost of adding RAM to your machine. G5s are another possibility, provided you do not need to boot to OS 9.

  • Adding more RAM to Tiger

    My ibook has 512MB's of RAM. I am happy with this. However since next year I plan to return to school to get a Masters in Ministry, I may need more RAM. From 2001-2005 while I working on my undergrad I used a Performa 6360 which had 136MB's of RAM + RAM Doubler. I was able to run some 20 apps at one time (or more) without a major slowdown. I cannot do this with Tiger, and since I plan to get the OSX version of Dave to access other PC's on the network (since whatever is built int OSX pales in comparison to Dave). On my Performa 6360 Dave was a necessity, since the campus dumped using Macs in 2002. I remember my 1st year (2001-2002) I could access a number of Macs on the Appletalk network at the time. But after the Fall 2002 semester the mac got dumped. Some students still used Macs, but fewer and fewer used them in the 2003-2005 years.
    So my question is. Will maxing out my ibook to a gig of RAM although me to run some 20-30m apps at one time (like I could on the Performa) or was OSX Tiger just not designed for this?
    OSX Tiger is much better than OS 9.1, but not in all areas as OS 9.x and before do have their advantages over Tiger.
    Thanks,
    John

    My ibook has 512MB's of RAM. I am happy with this.
    However since next year I plan to return to school to
    get a Masters in Ministry, I may need more RAM. From
    2001-2005 while I working on my undergrad I used a
    Performa 6360 which had 136MB's of RAM + RAM Doubler.
    I was able to run some 20 apps at one time (or more)
    without a major slowdown. I cannot do this with
    Tiger, and since I plan to get the OSX version of
    Dave to access other PC's on the network (since
    whatever is built int OSX pales in comparison to
    Dave). On my Performa 6360 Dave was a necessity,
    since the campus dumped using Macs in 2002. I
    remember my 1st year (2001-2002) I could access a
    number of Macs on the Appletalk network at the time.
    But after the Fall 2002 semester the mac got dumped.
    Some students still used Macs, but fewer and fewer
    used them in the 2003-2005 years.
    So my question is. Will maxing out my ibook to a gig
    of RAM although me to run some 20-30m apps at one
    time (like I could on the Performa) or was OSX Tiger
    just not designed for this?
    OSX Tiger is much better than OS 9.1, but not in all
    areas as OS 9.x and before do have their advantages
    over Tiger.
    Actually, OS 9 does not have any advantage over OS X. You had 136 MB of ram plus RamDoubler, why do you think 512 MB of ram will be less adequate?
    RamDoubler merely did what OS X does as part of how it works. It did not give you more ram it just allocated more to the app up front while dropping background apps as low as possible. This is what OS X does.
    If you were running 20 - 30 apps with 136 MB of ram then they weren't ram hogs at all and it's very likely you can run them without adding more ram now.
    OS X handles virtual memory much better too. In the old days I could run 2-3 apps at a time, now I can run 10-12, and most of mine are major ram hogs like Photoshop.
    Kevin

Maybe you are looking for