Which Mac mini for home server, Aperture & HTPC

Hi,
I'm buying a Mac mini for:
- home / small business server
- Occasional HTPC usage (will be hooked to my TV via HDMI)
- Occasional Aperture / iPhoto usage (minimal iMovie)
Which one is most suitable for this?
I was planing to go for Server  version (with bumped up RAM to 8GB), but now I read about video card and I'm not 100% anymore.
I will NOT use it for 3D - gaming or similar tasks!
Thak you all for help!
Vasja

I went for the non-server dual core i7 with AMD GPU and am very happy with it.  Do quite a bit of Aperture work and it never misses a beat (so far).  I'm not a fan of integrated Intel graphics and wouldn't trust it for HTPC duties.
I'm not sure how many/much of the 'server' functionality you're going to be using as it sounds more like file transfer and other tasks that could be accomplished through normal Lion.
Unless I'm missing something I assume the two hard drives in the Mini Server are just as much of a pain to replace as the one in the non-server Mini so I didn't see the point of having a two hard disc Mini.
For your requirements I would definitely look at how much of the server functionality you really need to utilise, and if the answer is 'not much' I'd recommend the i5 or i7 non-server Mini with AMD GPU and some sort of NAS, plus a sensible offsite backup plan for your data.

Similar Messages

  • I am considering purchasing the Mac mini for home studio audio production using Adobe Audition and a USB microphone.  Will the base mini model run these programs?

    I am considering purchasing the Mac mini for home studio audio production using Adobe Audition and a USB microphone.  Will the base mini model run these programs?

    The base mini has 4GB and a 5400 RPM hard drive. It is slow to start up and slow to launch large application such as Word (and I'd assume Adobe Audition) due to the slow drive. I've not used a new 4GB model, just the 8GB model, and the 8GB model (except for the slow drive) handles everything I've thrown at it, including running Photoshop, Word, Safari, and Mail at the same time but there is sometimes a delay switching between programs as the swapfile is updated. Overall I was not happy with the 5400 RPM drive (perhaps because I have MBA and iMac with Fusion drive) so I eventually upgraded it with an SSD. Now the mini is truly a warrior.

  • Mac Mini substitutes home server and apple tv?

    I have a HP mediasmart home server to manage backups, remote access and such. As well as I have an Apple TV where i store my pictures, movies, music etc.
    I wonder if the mac mini (+server) will be a good substitute for all that functionality?
    http://www.hp.com/united-states/campaigns/mediasmart-server/

    "But can it be both simultaneously?
    Both a server and a media machine that is showing a movie on your TV?"
    Yes it can, no problems.
    The Mini Server OSX is pretty much the same as the client Snow Leopard, complete with Front Row, iTunes, Mail, Safari etc, but no iLife09 supplied - you will have to pay extra for that.
    It will do everything that Snow Leopard will do but has all the server capabilities too if you know how to set it up/use the software.
    The only things I had trouble with was I can't find Migration Assistant and a strange quirk is that it won't share a USB connected printer across a network! No sign of printer sharing in System prefs but I guess you can do it via the Server config somewhere...
    I just used CUPS to enable Bonjour printer sharing - works fine
    I have been able to insatll everything I had on my previous CoreDuo Mini including Final Cut Express, iLife09, EyeTV, some bit torrent stuff - all works fine...
    I really like the fact that I can plug two monitors in - I have the MiniDVI connected to a 50" plasma and 1080p Projector (using an HDMI splitter), the Mini Display port feeds a separate 20" widescreen monitor - when the plasma/PJ is switched off the main display automatically switches back to the 20" monitor
    All in all this MiniServer is a great little HTPC - powerful and silent with 1TB of storage. The Server software is a bonus I haven't even looked at as yet

  • Which mac mini for the same price?

    Hello. I am about to purchase a new mac mini. Either the 1.24 ghz w/combo drive or the 1.42 ghz w/combo drive..
    here are the specs for the 1.25ghz model i would get:
    1GB DDR333 SDRAM - 1 DIMM
    80GB Ultra ATA drive
    Combo Drive
    Internal Bluetooth
    56K v.92 Modem
    Mac OS X - U.S. English
    1.25GHz PowerPC G4
    ATI Radeon 9200 w/32MB DDR video memory
    Here are the 1.42ghz specs that I would get:
    1GB DDR333 SDRAM - 1 DIMM
    80GB Ultra ATA drive
    Combo Drive
    Internal Bluetooth + AirPort Extreme Card
    No modem
    Mac OS X - U.S. English
    1.42GHz PowerPC G4
    ATI Radeon 9200 w/32MB DDR video memory
    Both models with the specs above will cost the same at the apple store at 774.00
    I have heard the 1.25ghz model's hard drive is a bit faster at 5400rpm. Is this a good reason to go with the 1.25ghz model? The only other difference in specifications between these two models is that the 1.42ghz model also includes the airport extreme card(I dont plan on getting the base station, but it could always be a possibilty in the future).
    The way I want these models configured costs exactly the same...the only differences being are the cpu speed, hard drive speed, and the airport extreme card.
    I have owned a G4 dual 1ghz powermac, and a g3 800mhz ibook. Needless to say, I love apple and the OSX opperating system!
    I am also considering the emac, but I am on a budget here. I will only be using this for the basic stuff(no cpu-intensive programs running here).
    I also dont want the superdrive becasue if I ever need one, I will buy an external firewire burner.
    Any and all advise will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for any help you can offer in my decision!
    -jason

    Whether Apple are, or are not, about to release bumped minis is not something anyone who has genuine knowledge is permitted to discuss or confirm. That there are rumors is true, but there have been rumors of all sorts of Apple products before - so proved true, but an amazing number proved otherwise.
    Given the intended use the original poster described, it seems highly likely to me that ANY mini would be more than adequate. The more RAM the better, the faster the better, but where budget is tight and where there are no extraordinary user expecations or demands, a 1.25 mini with 512Mb RAM is a very capable system.
    If Airport and or Bluetooth is required, the cost of adding them to the 1.25 model is sufficiently high that the 1.412 would make more sense. If a modem is needed and yet Airport or BT is desired, the 1.42 with built to order modem would be best. If using a RAM-hungry application such as Photoshop, the 1.25 qwith 1GHz RAM will run more smoothly and faster than a 1.42 with 512Mb RAM. Where processor hungry applications are involved (video editing for example) a 1.42 with 512Mb would generally perform a tad faster than a 1.25 with 1Gb - except when it comes to rendering effects and transitions etc.
    If budget allows, the 1.42 model with 1Gb RAM and a modem added would be pretty much ideal for power vs cost. And if still considering after a week, who knows, there may be bumped up models - though the same general principles by which to weigh the options would still apply.

  • Using mac mini for windows server vpn

    I'd like to use a Mac Mini with 16GB (might wait on the new one), to run a virtual Windows Server 2012 with Exchange and a virtual Windows Server 2012 with SQL Server.
    Anyone doing that successfully?

    Yes, you can upgrade the ram, harddrive and optical drive yourself. There are several websites that show how to do it. I've done it twice, it is really no big deal. Flip the mini over, use the right size putty knife(s) and carefully lift the lid off...from there it's a matter of removing some screws, and then reversing the procedure.
    I returned my mini 2.53 because I decided I really wanted to stick with laptop for this year. But for the 2 weeks I had it, I had Logic on it. Used a USB interface, and had some Firewire drives hooked up to it. It was excellent. It's so small that it can sit right on the desk where you can get at everything.
    I left the 5400 drive in it, and had zero problems. It's a rare day when someone maxes out their harddrive speed. If you check your meters in Logic, the cpu has always been maxed long, long before the HD I/O has been. If you are running 96K 30+ track creations, a mini isn't even going to be on your radar. Yet, many people use nothing but a Macbook Pro to do some very complicated tracks...and a mini is really just a macbook pro without screen/keyboard/trackpad and jammed in a small box.
    I think they are fantastic values.

  • Which Mac Mini for word processing?

    Hello, my partner is looking to buy a computer to use exclusively for word processing.  Since she literally only wants to use a word processor – probably either MS Word or Nisus Writer – and nothing else (not even the internet), I suggested she might get a secondhand Mac Mini.
    I was wondering if anyone had any particular advice on what to look out for – otherwise it would just be a case of seeing what the cheapest device on offer is at a local second-hand computer shop.
    These would be the requirements:
    1.  It must be able to run at least Snow Leopard, in order to run a modern word processor.
    2.  It must be secure, i.e. not liable to break/malfunction easily.  (My partner is writing a novel, so she doesn't want to lose it half way through!)
    3.  It must be able to start up quickly.
    I'm assuming these are modest requirements, so I assume I'm really asking if there's any particularly dodgy models I should look out for etc.
    Any thoughts welcome!
    Jon

    Adding an aftermarket SSD drive won't help keep the cost down though.  To some extent, often startup doesn't matter much as many people never shut their Macs down.  My MBP has not been turned off for more than a few days in 4 years - I'll sleep it when away from it, and the hard drive and screen are timed out to sleep, but I don't bother shutting it down and rebooting it often.  And the difference in boot time for an SSD versus a HDD is likely going to be under one minute on any machine made in the last 3-5 years, so is it worth the cost for that, especially if you are only rarely restarting the machine?  To my mind that answer is no, but everybody is different.
    If I/O is an actually bottleneck or high activity issue on a machine, that is when an SSD becomes worth the extra cost, to my mind.  For word processing, I/O will not be a limitation at all, even with an older 5400rpm conventional HDD, so using an SSD is largely paying for something without any real benefit.  Even in terms of reliability, SSDs are hardly error free or not prone to failure, and in real world use or MTBF type ratings, a good quality conventional HDD is just as reliable as any decent SSD (and sometimes is more so for certain types of failures under heavy use read/write conditions).
    Buying used is fine, if you know the place you are buying from and can trust them to only offer decent items.  As long as you backup regularly so you can recover, a used item may suit your budget and needs just fine.
    In the tight budget scenario though, it is hard to beat some of the available Windows PC consumer machines, and many of those are pretty good quality.  MS Word is MS Word by and large, whether on OS X or Windows.  Keep in mind for the PC route, the cost of decent AV (although many of the free tools are very good and more than enough if you are educated and savvy about what to do and not do with email or web sites&links).

  • I want to use a mac mini as a server supporting storage. Can I pair my macair to it for when I need to perform updates and maintenance ?

    I want to use a mac mini as a server supporting storage. I have other devices such as an iMac and iPad that will access information from the server. I do not want to purchase a monitor and keyboard as the unit will sit in a cupboard out of sight. Can I pair my macair to it for when I need to perform updates and maintenance ?

    I have a 2010 Mac Mini running Yosemite and Server which I use
    as a headless home server.
    I have is set up to allow screen sharing and can connect to it and
    control it with my iMac, Macbook Pro, iPhone, and a 2011 Mini Server
    that I use as an HTPC.
    You can check this out for all the Yosemite Server capabilities:
    https://help.apple.com/advancedserveradmin/mac/4.0/
    I have iTunes Home Sharing set up on it and have my entire iTunes
    library on it.  I can then use any of my Macs to play Movies or Songs
    from it and only keep locally a select subset of that on my individual
    devices.
    Rather than and update server, I utilize Server's Caching Service.  The caching
    server will duplicate any update download (system or MacApp Store purchases)
    any time a device that is connected to my network down loads one.  The update will
    then be stored locally and all other devices will download the update from it which
    can be faster than from Apple directly.  This has the advantage of only having to download
    once with limited bandwidth internet connections.  There is also an Update Server service
    available, but it is some what more involved in setting up.  However, it will download
    and store all available updates.
    There is another thing as well if you do not care for syncing things like Contacts, Calendar, etc.
    to iCloud, you can set Server up to sync these items across devices locally.

  • Which Mac Mini to Use as a Server?

    Hello Everyone,
    I have researched this but have not been able to find the answer I have been looking for as it relates to recent hardware and/or message posts.
    I want to set up a Mac Mini as a server to be used mainly for file storage with an external hard drive between 4 other Macs and a couple PCs, then have the files uploaded to a service such as CrashPlan for offsite backup. Also, I want to use it with VPN to access my files remotely. I don't plan to use it for anything else but that. My question is, concerning my needs, can I get by with the dual-core model or should I go with the quad-core or server model? The dual-core is $200 or $400 cheaper which I can use for other hardware, such as the external hard drive.
    Has anyone had experience with both to compare the performance and such?
    Has anyone used the Mac Mini for the same purpose I plan to use one for?
    What problems have you encountered?
    What are some things to be aware of?
    Do you have any other suggestions for this plan?
    Please don't be bashful. I need to hear the good, the bad, and the ugly. Your comments are greatly appreciated and will help me make an informed decision.
    Many thanks to everyone for your help!!!
    God bless you all!!!
    Puterdood.

    You shouldn't need anything more than the base i5 model ($599). The RAM is sufficient for your usage also. You don't need to spend the money on a Mac Mini Server.
    I currently have a late-2012 i5 base model with 4GB of RAM running OS X Mavericks and OS X Server 3.0.2. It works really well and with Maverick's memory management (memory compression), the 4GB of RAM is like having 6GB. I'm running the DNS, Profile Manager, File Sharing, Time Machine Backup, VPN and Open Directory services. It's a home server. I also added a 128GB SSD which I put OS X Mavericks, OS X Server, Apps and User accounts on. I use the stock 500GB HDD for data storage and file sharing.

  • Which mac mini should i go for: the one with AMD graphic card or Intel. I meanly going to use it for hometheater and HD movies.

    which mac mini should i go for: the one with AMD graphic card or Intel. I meanly going to use this for hometheater and HD movies.

    Intel HD 3000 graphics card can easily handle HD movies up to 1080p. But if you are looking at higher resolutions possibly 4k or 8k that are being released this summer in new TV's, I would go with the AMD card. The AMD card would be good for video and picture applications and also games. But if this is strictly to power your 1080p home theater setup then the choice is obviously the Intel HD 3000.

  • Which Mac Mini Configuration Recommended for Leopard??

    I'm about to purchase a new Mini to replace my (beautiful!) G4 Cubes, and would appreciate any comments/recommendations on which configuration to order. I'm planning to get the upgraded 2GB of memory (more is always better!, and my guess would be that the 2.0 GHz processor with a 120 GB HD + SuperDrive should be a nice ticket - or would you recommend a bigger HD? (I don't do intensive graphics or any gaming, but I want to be able to run OS X and MS Windows simultaneously (with Parallels?).
    Also... I currently have 2 G4 Cubes networked to run on a single DSL service using a FriendlyNet Ethernet Hub and 2Wire modem. Any problems simply substituting the Mac Mini for one of the Cubes in this network?
    Final question, please: With Leopard plus Parallels on the new Mini, what is the minimum Microsoft package I would need to buy in order to open and work with basic Excel, PPS, and Word documents?
    With your comments/recommendations, I'm ready to add my contribution to Apple's gross and net income for the current quarter!!..... Thanks!... CaptDenny

    Welcome to Apple Discussions!
    The requirements for Leopard are sufficiently low that even an old Mac mini should run it well, let alone one of the new Core 2 Duo models. As such, the 2.0 model with 2Gb RAM should be more than adequate. Leopard's only notably heavier demand is drive space, now requiring close to 10Gb. Clearly the 120Gb drive standard in the 2.0 model would be adequate to that task, plus allow for use of Windows also. As such, a larger internal drive wouldn't really be recommended, though you may wish to consider adding a good sized external, preferably a firewire connected drive, for extra storage and backup.
    Where running Windows is concerned, Leopard comes with BootCamp, so you could use that as opposed to Parallels. The downside is that while BootCamp is free, it doesn't permit the running of MacOS and Windows side by side. At boot, you have to select one or the other. If that meets your needs, then it's a better bet in many ways, since it allows the entire system, memory and processor to be dedicated to whichever OS you need at any given time, rather than shared.
    On the other hand, if you need or want to run both MacOS and Windows simultaneously, and switch between them, Parallels is the option that would allow that, though both MacOS and Windows will suffer in terms of absolute performance since RAM and CPU are shared between them.
    You should have no problem substituting a new mini into your home network using the same setup as you presently have on the soon to be retired Cube.
    To run Excel, PowerPoint and Word, you'll need a copy of MS Office. The current version for Mac is still 2004, which is not Intel native. The updated version to closely match MS Office 2007 for Windows will not be out for Mac until 2008. If you buy a copy of MS Office 2004 for Mac however, you'll get an upgrade to the new version when it is released. Upgrading at that point would be advised since while the current version is not Intel native, the new version due is. If you are a student or teacher, you will qualify for the Academic version at around $150, otherwise it's a little expensive $400 list price.

  • If I install the Mail server on a Mac Mini as a server, can my users utilize Outlook as their mail client and how will it be different for them?

    If I install the Mail server on a Mac Mini as a server, can my users utilize Outlook as their mail client and how will it be different for them?

    Your users can utilize Outlook no matter where your email is hosted at.
    how will it be different for them
    different from what?

  • I want to install Snow Leopard Server on our MacPro (2.66) using Mac Mini Snow Leopard Server disks?  I kept getting an error for backwards compatibility.   Is this possible or do I need to purchase another copy of Snow Leopard Server?

    I want to install Snow Leopard Server on our MacPro(2.66) using Mac Mini Snow Leopard Server disks?  I kept getting an error for backwards compatibility.   Is this possible or do I need topurchase another copy of Snow Leopard Server?

    The OS disks that are shipped with a particular product
    are set up so that tey will only install on that product.
    It will install on any Mini of that exact vintage, but that
    is all.
    This is to prevent people from doing exactly what you
    are trying to do.  The license for OSX shipped with any
    is only valid for that product.  Also, Snow Leopard,
    including Server, is only permitted to be run on one
    computer at a time.  Bottom line, unlike Lion, legally
    you cannot install the same copy on multiple
    computers unless some "family pack" or site license
    is purchased.
    Yes, you need to purchase another copy.
    The copy of Snow Leopard license is here:
    http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/macosx_snowleopard.pdf

  • How to make a SL Mac Mini a VPN server?

    I'd like to set up my Mac Mini at home as a VPN server.  I have read online that it can be done in non server SL, but I see in network where to add a VPN, but that looks more like a connecting into one rather than setting one up.  Is there a way to set up a VPN server on this Mini, and at that, for free? 

    If you have a new enough Mac mini you could use Mountain Lion and Server.app however for Snow Leopard you can in theory do it also so.
    For Snow Leopard (client) you can try following various howto guides on setting up the included VPN server software via the command-line. The user version of OS X has always contained the same basic server software such as DHCP, DNS, http, and in this case VPN but does not include the Apple tools for making it easy to setup.
    Here are some links
    http://dreaming-artemis.com/2011/07/18/setting-up-vpn-on-the-imac-osx-snow-leopa rd-10-6-8/
    http://stormrook.com/2010/05/31/setting-up-a-vpn-server-on-osx/#more-39
    There is also the option of buying a relatively cheap GUI utility which does the setting up for you, see
    http://macserve.org.uk/projects/ivpn/

  • Mac Mini or Xserve server

    hello everyone i have a question involving the mac mini and the xserve system. I am running a home video company and use about three different macs to edit. My server is currently a dual core xserve g5 at 2.0ghz with 3gb ram. it has two internal drive raided together. In my house we also have about 14 computers, which the rest of my family use. I was thinking of integrating things like network home directories and netboot into the house, but i dont want to do this off my xserve because i want my video to be separate from everyone else's things.
    Im thinking about buying the standard mac mini server, except i dont know which i should use it for. I can keep my xserve for video, and the mac mini for everything else like the network home and netboot, or i can do the opposite and switch to the mini server for video and the xserve for the house. i like that on the xserve i can expand it a lot, but on the mini, it comes with a terabyte drive standard, and i can add a couple firewire.
    I dont really know which to pick, id like other peoples perspectives
    thanks

    An interesting conundrum...
    First off, I concur with the concept of network home directories vs NetBoot.
    The pain, heartache and overhead of setting up and maintaining NetBoot isn't really worth it for your network. Dozens or hundreds of identical systems (e.g. a lab or cluster network), maybe, but a few disparate systems? not so much.
    That said, the decision really comes down to your video workflow.
    How well is the G5 standing up to the task now? If it's stressing then it might make sense to upgrade that and use the Mini for your video work. Overall, though, I wouldn't expect a huge performance boost going to the Mini - it doesn't have the best graphics performance, or the best disk performance, both of which will impact video production. It should be slightly faster overall but not enough to make it a must-have upgrade.
    The other advantage would be a more modern platform, the latest OS version and the ability to take advantage of the latest application updates, all of which would be waning on the G5.
    So, overall I'd probably go with the Mini for video and turning the XServe into a home directory/media server for the rest of the systems in the house.

  • Will I have OSX Server in my App Store if I buy a "Mac Mini with OSX Server"?

    I am planning on buying Mac Mini for a Home Media Server, and I am curious if the OSX Server will be added to my account. Or do you think I would better get the same system configuration without the OSX Server, then buy it from the App Store? Is there going to be a difference between the two different processes.

    It won't automatically be added to your account unless you supply your account details when you buy.  But once you've received your server you can phone Apple Sales and give your details (including order number or server serial number) and they should add Server to your account for you.
    What you actually get will be identical.

Maybe you are looking for