Who Has An NVidia 7800 GT in their Quad G5?

I just upgraded to an NVidia 7800 GT video card in my G5 quad 2.5 GHz. The video card has a power cable with a 6-prong connector (3 over 3). I can't see where this cable connects to the computer, nor do I see any 3 over 3 prong connectors anywhere in the computer. Since this is a factory-option card in this computer, does anyone out there have this card & know where to connect the power cable??
Thanks in advance!

Figure 5 of this document shows the Guide and the fan. The connector is in between if I remember correctly. http://www.info.apple.com/usen/cip/pdf/g5/073-0821.pdf

Similar Messages

  • Who HAS NOT had problems with their PM G5?

    After reading tonnes of posts of problems; who HAS NOT had any problems with their PM G5?
    What kind of Maint do you do it (if any).
    And when did you buy your PM G5?
    Message was edited by: PowermacRules

    Mine was a refurbished unit that I bought in January(?) 2004. I was a bit nervous buying a 'used' system. But it proved unfounded. I remember visiting these forums in 04/05 and seeing lots of angry posts about DoA G5s and a laundry list of issues. But mine was completely rock solid from day one. It was a real work horse never had a single issue. Until last week. From what people are saying in and outside these forums. I suspect that it's only a matter of time before all or most G5s eventually fail with faulty logic boards or processors. At least let's say, I don't expect to see them still running in 10 years from now, like a lot of previous generation Macs do.

  • Is there a way to increase the icon size (and the text below) without using zoom?  I am trying to help out someone who has moderate visual impairment that does not want to use zoom just to see the icons and their labels.

    Is there a way to increase the icon size (and the text below) without using zoom in iOS 7?  I am trying to help out someone who has moderate visual impairment that does not want to use zoom just to see the icons and their labels.

    Hello Apple.
    It seems you have gone to great lengths to improve accessibility in many areas of the iPad. Why was this obvious problem with icon text size missed?  (It's not with the Mac.). And for so long too.
    Do you employ people with actual accessibility problems to help you do UI design?
    I think too, that some buttons are too close for people who might have motor control problems.
    I love my iPad but I fear as I age, the iPad might not keep up with me.

  • Query to find all the suppliers who has their invoices on hold

    Hi All,
    Query to find all the suppliers who has their invoices on hold (at least 1) .
    Thanks,
    Vamshi

    Pls find the script to find the Hold invoies for those suppliers 
    select aps.VENDOR_NAME,aia.INVOICE_NUM,aia.INVOICE_AMOUNT
    from ap_suppliers aps,ap_invoices_all aia,ap_holds_all aha
    where aia.VENDOR_ID = aps.VENDOR_ID 
    and aia.INVOICE_ID = aha.INVOICE_ID 
    and aha.RELEASE_REASON is null
    Thanks
    Hari

  • Who has maxed out their space on their 160?  How much space can itunes store on a MacBook?  should I just shift "jazz" to a new iPod and keep rock on my current 160?  any suggestions?

    Who has maxed out their space on their 160?  How much space can itunes store on a MacBook?  should I just shift "jazz" to a new iPod and keep rock on my current 160?  any suggestions?

    I have not filled the iPod Classic 160 GB.  I have most of my music and a few movies for traveling on that one.  Before I bought it, I had a 20 GB that was always full.  Now, what I do is have rock music on a shuffle that I use for biking or running.  Audio Books are on an iPod Touch.  The 20 GB unit is no longer used (given away) and replaced with the 160 that holds just about everything else.
    The MacBook is limited by the size of the hard disk.  Many people with have their entire iTunes library on an external USB or Firewire hard drive and have iTunes map to that.  Remember that this is not truly a backup (if the library is only on one drive, it is not a backup, nor should the iPod/iPhone/iPad/etc. be considered a backup)
    If you have the means to have another device, I would agree that splitting your music by genre on each device is the way to go.  I've known people that sort their music on devices by artist, album, etc.  As long as you find a way that works for you.

  • Who has received their 17" MBP?

    Hey guys
    Ok - who has recieved their 17" MBP already?
    Info please - we are very eager to hear how it is to work with.
    Is the display any good?
    Does it whine?
    Does it burn your lap?
    How's the battery life?
    Thanks in advance, and congrats!!
    Nick

    No wine at all (batt or ac). It gets warm to hot just like my ibook G4 and my wife's sony vaio laptop. We both use targus notebook chill pad. (On sale this week at best buy for $ 19.99). I havn't run batt test yet but does seem to last 4-5 hrs when just surfing the web. A lot less when burning dvd's. By the way sony batts are 2x the price of apple's. I do have a hindge problem that I will get fixed in the future. The hard drive is a lot easier to replace. If I could buy it all over again I wouldn't of waited to by one!! Hope this helps. By the way, I've only had an apple for 1 year.

  • HT2736 I have a $100 card from apple when I bought a macbook this summer.  I want to share the amount between my two kids -- 1 who has I-pad, other kid has macbook.  They have their own apple ID's assoc. w/ their device.  May I pass on the balance to them

    I have a $100 card from apple when I bought a macbook this summer.  I want to share the amount between my two kids -- 1 who has I-pad, other kid has macbook.  They have their own apple ID's assoc. w/ their device.  May I pass on the balance to them??

    A gift card can only be redeemed onto one account, it can't be split between accounts and it can't be used to gift amounts and/or items to other accounts (gifting can only be done via a credit card).

  • I presently use the Pinnacle Studio program, and am considering purchasing an Apple computer, and using Final Cut Pro X, although all of the previews I have seen appear to be difficult. Is their anyone who has used both?

    I have been using Pinnacle Studio, and am considering purchasing an Apple computer, and Final Cut Pro X. I have looked at several tutorials, and am concerned that the program may be over my head, as it appears to be difficult. I wonder if there is anyone out there who has experience with both programs, and can advise me.

    Ah yes, I remember Pinnacle Studio crashes very well, even with my reasonably powerful PC.  Anyhow, I am running FCPX on a Late 2012 27" iMac, 3.2 GHz Intel Core i5, with 16 GB RAM.  I also run it on a Mid 2009 15" MacBook Pro, 2.53 GHz Intel Core Core 2 Duo, with 8 GB RAM.  It runs great on both Macs, although there is more beachballing on the MBP - I don't use background rendering on it.  There are also plenty of people out there running it successfully on a Mac Mini.  The usual recommendation is to get the best Mac you can afford.  Don't forget to budget money for an external Thunderbolt hard drive!

  • Can't see who has replied to the thread in the forum, its pointess?

    What's the point in creating a system where you can't see who has replied to the thread? Its absolutely F**CKING pointless? Does anyone at Adobe have any brains or are they all sitting with their heads up their backsides?
    Surely before you release such garbage you test for these very simple issues, right?
    osgood_(NOT M Golding) If anyone at Adobe is monitoring this please get my screen named changed to what it was previously as well.

    It needs a 'latest reply' on the posted list page like the old version otherwise you have no idea if anyone has replied to the post or not without opening it.
    Latest reply: May 3, 2014 2:17 AM by . osgood_
    The line below is not that necessary in the order of priority, which for all intense and purposes is quite useless. I don't really care about how long ago something was posted or where it was posted but an indication to show 'updated' posts and by who is vital.
    9 minutes ago in Dreamweaver support forum
    Why do we even need 'Dreamweaver support forum'. We already know that's where we are! I guess a selection of posts from other forums may appear in a 'general' postings list somewhere, but who really cares - if I'm asking a question related to DW that's the forum I'm going to, not a general list as I don't care a monkey knackers what's been posted in Fireworks or InDesign or Illustrator. If I did I'd go to those forums.
    If you are tracking several postings it is going to become hugely annoying for both the person who has asked the question and the people helping the original poster as many replies will potentially go unnoticed and not resolved.
    And what's with the silly horizontal scroll bar being created for long lines of text? That's annoying too.
    Plenty of teething issue you need to get your head around over the next few weeks.

  • Is it time yet for Microsoft to "Recall" Office 2013 and provide anyone who has a 2013 license a replacement Office 2010 license?

    The interface is terrible and can't be changed.  Every application in the suite locks up/crashes nearly constantly on any machine it is used on.  The activation process is terrible and wastes hours of any support/IT dept's time.  From a 'privacy
    standpoint', the software is seemingly criminally intrusive.  It is clearly a product that should never have been released and is so far from functional that it can't be repaired by any 'service pack', 'hotfix', or 'patch'.  It needs to be completely
    scrapped.
    The only 'redeeming quality' of this software is that the guy who was in charge of creating it is gone from Microsoft.  (Unfortunately, he is now President Obama's appointee for running the attempt at repairing the 'healthcare.gov' website... 
    out of the frying pan...   )
    When the software is installed using one profile (domain or machine account) and a different profile tries to use the software, it requires 're-activation' - which often fails because the software believes it has been installed multiple times. (This is particularly
    frustrating because it has to be installed by an administrative user, but most of the time, the person who 'uses' the software is not the 'administrator' - so it is almost always being 'installed' using one profile and 'used' using another profile).
    The necessary intrusion into privacy created by the requirement of a "Microsoft Account" to use the software is seemingly criminal.
    The tracking of, and installation of licenses is absolutely ridiculous. 
    An example: 
    Many of my clients have many users and many computers (up to 75 or so). 
    I could create a "Microsoft User Account" for each 'user', but these machines get moved between users, and the software license is tied to the 'machine' and not to the 'user' so as soon as that happens, the licenses and the users are no longer
    in line and become impossible to track.
    I could create a "Microsoft User Account" for each 'computer'... and I can't even count the ways this would be a nightmare to try to track.
    I actually did that up front for one client, and created Exchange email boxes for each computer so that "prove you are really you" emails from Microsoft could be received managed, and responded to, and passed out second usernames and passwords
    to all of the users so they could "log-in" to their Office 2013 software, and created a database of the 'computer usernames and passwords' so I could track this... unfortunately, this confused the users (as it rightfully should) so they would change
    the passwords for their computer's 'Microsoft User Account' thus locking me out and invalidating my database, ... and... CLUSTERF#%K!!!
    As a 'best - worst case', I have had to create a single 'Microsoft User Account" for each of my clients' businesses so I can install and activate Office 2013 products.  This is a whole new set of "Awesome Stupidity". 
    Now, I can put a new computer into a client's office and install their new license key for their oem Office 2013, and it shows up in the 'business's Microsoft User Account'.  Then when I give the machine to the user, I get to 're-activate' the software
    (hoping that it doesn't tell me to piss-off - which happens about 40% of the time.  This is a process that can only be described as a "feat of engineering created by a group of monkeys whose former jobs included 'janitor at MAD magazine headquarters'
    or 'beer-pong referee'). 
    It starts with two hours of pressing phone buttons and ultimately talking to someone who tells me "yeah, nothin' I can do about that I'm just here for product activation" (which, incidentally, is done by machine until you pass through MS's ridiculous
    labyrinth of repetitious keystroking until the machine is convinced you are just too stupid to punch in the right numbers and allows you to talk to a person... who then asks you for the exact same set of numbers and repeats back the exact same responding set
    of numbers and acts dumbfounded when it still doesn't work - since it didn't work the first six times you punched or said it into the phone) followed by "I need to send you to the support group... but because it's 6:30 pm (in a process you started at
    3:00pm) they are gone for the day and you'll have to call back on Monday morning"
    At some point in the process, you get to log into the "Microsoft user account" and 'roll the roulette wheel of stupidity' by trying to activate the right software from a list of 40 different lines that all say "Microsoft Office 2013 Home and
    Business oem", but none give any indicator or differentiating factor like for instance: license key, date installed, license key last 4 digits, mother's maiden name, phase of moon when software was first activated, color or type of blood of the user's
    paperboy's dog's previous owner... NOTHING... RANDOM FREAKING STAB IN THE DARK - pick one, any one, hope its the license you are trying to install onto this machine, 'cause if not, you very well may kill the product on some other machine.
    So through the process, the lucky support staff person gets' to waste roughly an hour and a half on average for every Microsoft Office 2013 installation.  I have actually had to start telling my clients that they are going to likely have to pay an extra
    $100 or so per machine in order to get their new Microsoft Office software which comes on their new computer activated - that number tends to work out roughly accurately - except that it is a terrible way of trying to 'please a client'.
    Oh,... and did I mention... "THE SOFTWARE CONSISTANTLY FAILS"!?! 
    A client tries to open a document that they have been using for 8 years and Excel doesn't say "Hey, I don't know how to deal with some element of the file that you put in here using Excel 2003, or Office 2010 (both products, by the way, which worked
    great) - no... instead,... it crashes.  Doesn't really do any damage to the file it choked on, but the work you'd been doing on three other files which you also had open,... yeah,... that work is gone.
    Yeah,.... over time, I have developed a pretty consistent spiel for client's needing new computers that goes over how absolutely terrible Office 2013 is, and explains that our options are further limited by Microsoft's yanking of all Office 2010 or previous
    products from market availability, and explaining the merits of both LibreOffice and OpenOffice, as well as their drawbacks.  I also have a strangely static response explaining how "larger companies are not burdened by these issues because they are
    able to use MOPL which allows them to downgrade their productivity software to Office 2010 so they can continue to function happily, but this is really not a cost effective solution for smaller companies who primarily buy oem Office products with their replacement
    computers".
    Unfortunately, many clients still decide they want to go with Office 2013 because they apparently believe "it really can't be that bad".  The value in my 'presale descriptions' are only really realized when they come back to me a week, two
    weeks, or up to a month after the new machine is in place and say "wow,... you were right".  The place I am left open for any further problems is when I don't impress upon them beforehand just HOW BAD OFFICE 2013 REALLY IS.  In that case,
    they still come back to me as though I have done something wrong foe selling them this piece of $#!% software and I have to remind them of our previous discussions.
    Strangely, far too few heed the warnings and buy the software anyway - but the discussion has saved many clients the costs of Microsoft Project, because the discussion of LibreOffice and OpenOffice nearly always leads to at least a small philosophical conversation
    about 'Open Source Software' in general, and my absolute favorite descriptive analogy in that discussion is to compare Microsoft Project at $600 v. ProjectLibre at $0 - and then further describe the costs of licensing and implementing the associated back-end
    server solutions, etc. 
    This is a saving grace for me, because even though the client has been saddled with Office 2013, they have also saved substantially on Project and it is a rare (but granted, not absolutely absent) occasion that ProjectLibre is lacking some feature or function
    that they actually need or want to use - and on those occasions, finding out has cost them absolutely nothing in software purchases. 
    Its not surprising, I suppose, that clients have grown to accept Office as a required 'cost', but still choke heavily on the price-tag of Project every time they have to buy it.  The interesting thing to watch over the coming couple of years will be
    'how many businesses stop accepting MS Office as a 'required cost' due to the failing of the software itself and the fact that most are being burned, at least once, by purchasing the software "against technical advice" and are learning, merely by
    virtue of HOW BAD Office is, that there are other options out there that both cost less and work better... I mean,... LOTS BETTER.
    How many businesses that are used to accepting the cost of Microsoft Office as a cost of doing business will be moved over to open source options and satisfied by them by the time Microsoft releases its next version - which will, presumably work - such that
    they will no longer justify the cost of Microsoft's offering even if it is 'superior' to the open source offerings because the open source offerings are plenty sufficient and include a price tag of $0 and an installation/implementation time that is much, much
    shorter than Microsoft's offering.
    If Microsoft doesn't make some dramatic reparations, and do it soon, I expect their market share will be reduced in this area by a very significant margin.
    I am suggesting either a 'Complete Recall' of Office 2013 including an 'uninstall 2013/install 2010' process driven by the automatic update engine, or at the very least, a free and easy downgrade rights offering for anybody who has already purchased 2013
    and anyone who purchases it between now and the time the next "functional product" is released.

    I understand the inconvenience you are experiencing when working with Office 2013.
    If you have any feedback about Office 2013 product, click the and submit to Microsoft.
    Microsoft will decide how to fix the problem for all customers.
    For the activation mechanism, it intends to protect customers of their rights and interests.
    For a retail version of Office, if it was purchased with a disk, Microsoft account is not necessary during the installation.
    For volume license of Office, refer to the following link to deploy Office suites can be much efficient:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc178982.aspx
    For the problem Office 2013 keep crashing, check the following link to check:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2813143/en-us
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2758592/en-us
    Thanks,
    Tyor Wang
    Forum Support
    Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no
    help.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here

  • Screaming from video card - nvidia 7800 GS

    Bought an Mac AGP Nvidia 7800 GS 256mb card... bios 5.70.02.46.01
    hooked up the molex extension, everything looks good, fire it up? it screams at me angrily.
    did i hook something up wrong?

    Hi-
    This has been flashed to Mac ROM, correct?
    Screams, as in a high pitched squeal/beep?
    This means there isn't power to the Molex.
    Did you split power from the optical drive?
    Double check connections, as sometimes a pin will push out of a Molex connector.
    Also, if the card has tape on the pins (#3 and #11), that should be removed to allow additional 12v.

  • Could someone who has dns set up correctly confirm that this test works?

    The test that's here http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106798 says if you attempt to visit this link:
    http://17.254.0.91
    and you are taken to Apple's page then you probably don't have your DNS set up correctly.
    Can anyone confirm, who has their DNS set up correctly, that attempting to visit that link does not work for them please?
    TIA

    Right, thanks for that info. I don't understand what all the code stuff is at all, but I do understand this:
    If you type in the link stated and you are taken to Apple’s page then DNS IS SET UP CORRECTLY.
    I'm still confused though. In that article/test in part of its explanation of DNS it says:
    If you encounter some applications that continue to work, it may be because they are set up to go directly to an IP address, bypassing the need for DNS service.
    Surely typing in http://17.254.0.91 into your browser is a way of making your browser access apple's site *bypassing DNS*? -- because you're using the IP address irradicating the need for changing a name into an IP address. The way to test if DNS is working, surely, is to try and access apple's site via www.apple.com? Not http://17.254.0.91.
    Thanks.

  • I need to download my Verizon bill. For some reason my account says I'm a "Member" and not the "Manager" or "Owner" so I can't download the bill. I AM THE ONLY PERSON ON THIS ACCOUNT. I AM THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAS EVER BEEN ON THIS ACCOUNT. ONLY ME. JUST M

    I need to download my Verizon bill. For some reason my account says I'm a "Member" and not the "Manager" or "Owner" so I can't download the bill. I AM THE ONLY PERSON ON THIS ACCOUNT. I AM THE ONLY PERSON WHO HAS EVER BEEN ON THIS ACCOUNT. ONLY ME. JUST ME.

    Prepaid accounts don't have Account Owners/Managers, they just have Account Members (and prepaid accounts have less options regarding changes via their My Verizon account as a result).

  • Who has logged into SharePoint 2007 in 2014?

    We are going to be decommissioning our SharePoint 2007 server (running on Windows Server 2003 SP2 machine) very soon. There aren't a lot of people that use our 2007 instance any more but I will need alert all of the users who do still use it that
    we will be decommissioning it that way they can make sure their pertinent data is moved or saved elsewhere.
    I have tried using the Usage Summary to get a list of all of the users who have used SP 2007 this year but I am not finding it very helpful. I have checked the Event Viewer >  Security logs, but it is a lot to go through and the native filter is
    not dynamic enough.
    Can somebody recommend what I should use to compile a concise list showing who has logged in and when?
    Thank you in advance!

    within LogFiles is a subfolder for each IIS web application. Match the webapp ID to the subfolder. Each log file will include the HTTP request (specifically the HTTP GET request), and the authenticated username (if any).
    You should be able to pull a log file into Excel relatively easily (columns are separated by spaces).
    Scott Brickey
    MCTS, MCPD, MCITP
    www.sbrickey.com
    Strategic Data Systems - for all your SharePoint needs

  • HT201272 wait just to be sure i am not the only one who has the "term and conditions" problem

    wait just to be sure i am not the only one who has the "term and conditions" problem

    Go to Crucial.com and use one of their two methods to determine what upgrades are available for your Mac:
    I would purchase the modules from Crucial as they are very reliable and wiill work with you if you have problems.
    OT

Maybe you are looking for