Who's Who restriction based on Co.Code

Hi Experts,
We are having 4 company codes and one org structure. In Who's who service, I will have to restrict to view other employee details who belong to the same company code. Currently all employees are able to view all data. I checked in tcode PZ01C but not able to figure out as to how to restrcit. Please help.
Thanks!

Hi,
Hey you need to create the customised  role in PFCG for the employee who dose not see the data for other co codes..............
And once that get the done then you need to attached this role in the USER in SU01 ..
then it will work fine

Similar Messages

  • 0HR_PY_PP_1 restricting based on Company Code

    Hi ,
    I am trying to use extractor  HR_PY_PP_1. The extractor pulls all the CC data as it do not allow selection based on Company Code.
    When we try to change in extractor in source system it does now show field for selection. So I changed the values in ROOSFIELD table .
    Now I see CC for selection but still after making the company code selection , it do not select  the data based on that particular company code.
    Any idea in this direction will be much appreciated.

    Vamsi,
    I think you do not want to allow to see the some FI user these Tcodes data for specific companies.
    I think you have assigned more then one role to user and mentined 3 Tcodes are coming from multiple roles and the user buffer is having multiple entry for the . If this is the case please keep these Tcodes in one role only and restrict the user only in F_BKPF_BUK BUKRS.
    If only one role is assigned to you then assigned the required company codes at Orgranisation Level only and it will populated at Authorisation Object F_BKPF_BUK BUKRS for company codes.
    I would advise you not to modify the SAP standard object in SU24 because it can distrub the Standard Auth. Object.
    Hope this will help.
    Lokendra

  • F.01 restriction based on Company Code

    Hi Team,
    We wants to restrict the use of F.01 tcode based on the company code but i don't see any object where i can restrict this.
    Please provide any solution for this
    Regards
    Narinder

    Hi Narinder/V A Joshi
    Can transaction FC10N be used instead?
    Looking at SE93 definitions, F.01 uses program RFBILA00 and FC10N uses program RFBILA00N. It looks like FC10N is the new version (I thought a lot of the F.* transactions were replaced).
    Can you confirm with functional team if the FC10N transaction should be used instead of F.01? You should then be able to restrict on object F_BKPF_BUK.
    Regards
    Colleen

  • Restriction of Tcode SQ01 based on Company code

    We are running one customized query using Tcode SQ01.  We need to restrict Tcode SQ01 in company code level.  We have checked about authorization object in st01. But there is no check of authorization object. Can anybody help to restrict SQ01 based on company code level?
    Regards
    Auroshikha

    Hi Auroshikha,
    Itu2019s very easy to maintain authorization in your Infoset Query report. I got and implemented similar requirement i.e. restriction /authorization as per company code.
    You need to use authority check for authorization object  P_ORGIN in your infoset.
    Please follow the bellow steps:
    -->Go to SQ02, Enter your Infoset name and click on Change button.
    -->Click on 'Code' (Shift+F8) icon dispalyed on application toolbar, you will be moved to Code Section of Infoset that lists different events.
    -->Choose Record Processing event from code section.
    -->Write the following code in 'Record processing' event of your Infoset.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'P_ORGIN'
    *ID 'INFTY' FIELD '*'
    *ID 'SUBTY' FIELD '*'
    ID 'AUTHC' FIELD 'R' "read
    ID 'PERSA' FIELD P0001-WERKS
    *ID 'PERSG' FIELD DUMMY
    *ID 'PERSK' FIELD DUMMY
    *ID 'VDSK1' FIELD DUMMY.
    CHECK Sy-SUBRC EQ 0.
    Note: PERSA field used in this Authorization object plays an importan role , if you are in different module other that HR , then pass here table_name-companycode_field
    -->Genetare Infoset
    -->Go to SQ01 (in a new session) , Click on exeute or 'Test button' to check authorization is working for report
    Let me know if you need any more details.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Dinesh Tiwari

  • Any option to restrict SE16 record level access based on company code?

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement to restrict record level access in SE16 based on company code.
    Our SAP system has two company codes. The requirement is that users of one company code should not be able to see records of other company code in SE16.
    Is it possible through some exits/badis/other methods?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Arun Mohan

    You could write a small front end that accepts the company code, applies custom authorization code for each value and retains or removes, then calls the transaction and enters the selections the user requested and that your authorization check resulting in "passing"....  Of course, you'd have to block those users from "pure" SE16...   I once worked in situation similar, users in one country couldn't see USA data, etc. I think someone wrote an entire new program, called by ZSE16, for that.

  • Restrict access in report based on compnay codes and cost centers

    Hi,
    We are using a standard report, which is  assigend to a Z transaction and assigend to the role.
    The report need to be restricted based on the company code and cost center   ?
    but i could not find any AUTHORITY- CHECK statements in the code ( there is only authority check statement for object G_803J_GJB which has authorization groups and aCTVT field.)
    Please let me know what steps need to be followed to restrict the report based on company codes and cost centers.
    Thanks for your help in advance.

    Thanks all for the quick response.
    Steps to be followed:
    1) incorporatomg AUTHORITY-CHECK  statements for K_KOSTL and F_BKPF_BUK objects in the program.
    2) adding the objects as check yes in SU24 for the Z transaction.
    and restricting in the role.
    The program name is "GP3O4ZGOOF3HA68QMGHF8S7I9ER250".
    Please let me know if any more steps need to be followed.
    Based on this i have to send a estimate to my client.
    Thanks,
    Sanketh.

  • Access restriction in IM52 based on company code and investment reason

    Hi,
    How can we have access restriction in IM52 based on company code and investment reason?
    thanks
    Randeep

    hi
    please check the authorization object for the transaction
    company code you can

  • Who can solve the error code 403 on hp5522 ? help please

    who can solve the error code 403  on hp5522 ?   help please

    Hello fredovolley,
    Welcome to the HP Support Forums!
    I see that you are experiencing an error 403 with the Photosmart 5520 series. I would like to offer the steps I have given before, check them out here: Re: Trouble scanning using Photosmart 6520
    Even though it states it is for a 6520, the steps are all the same. I hope this help, cheers!
    JERENDS
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click “Accept as Solution” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" to the left of the reply button to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • CRM: PFCG Roles restricted based on Sales Organization

    Hi,
    I have a requirement in SAP CRM 7.0 to create roles restricted based on Sales Organization(locations). We have two Sales Organization XXX and YYY, for which users need to be restricted. I have used the following objects for this regard.
    CRM_ORD_OP,  CRM_ORD_LP, CRM_ORD_PR, CRM_ORD_OE,  CRM_BP_SA
    Every user has assigned a sales role in which the above objects are deactivated and separate roles with values to the objects, with respective Sales Org values for the objects CRM_ORD_OE,  CRM_BP_SA been provided. I have assigned these roles to respective users (User A with XXX, User B with YYY) based on their sales org locations. These users are positioned in the Organizational Model (PPOMA_CRM) under their respective Sales groups as per the requirement for the object CRM_ORD_LP, and authorization to this object is restricted to A for CHECK_LEV (Your Own Sales Organization). We use * for the objects CRM_ORD_OP and CRM_ORD_PR, as we do not control these.
    After restricting all these, we do not find that the result not appearing as we expect, that is, restricting the sales organization data. We need all accounts, all activities, all opportunities, all leads, all campaigns etc. should be restricted by Sales Org, but when we search for accounts, activities, opportunities, leads, campaigns, we get result list with all data without any restrictions. I even checked the following forum, http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1579211, which talks about the same kind of issue, but as I have already using the same objects for the restriction, it didnt help me much. I tried deactivating object CRM_BP_SA as it is not discussed on the forum, also tried CHECK_LEV=A,B,C,D,E for object CRM_ORD_LP, but all results the same.
    Additional Info: When tried to create a project, with user A who is authorized for XXX, normally it would pick up the Sales Area Data for the project from the user (meaning User A from the XXX Sales Org.), but I get an error message: Enter a sales org, enter a dist. channel and enter an org unit etc. Even when I search for leads, it displays a list of data, when I click on any, it issues the error message: Enter a sales org, enter a dist. channel and enter an org unit (Sales) etc
    Is that we miss any object restriction that is not restricting these objects properly or is it any customization missing? Please advice.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Shahul Hameed M
    BASIS Consultant

    Hi Shahul,
    I have a similar requirement as of yours.  I have maintained auth values, in role as below:
    CRM_ORD_LP
    03       ACTVT
    A        CHECK_LEV
    *         PR_TYPE
    CRM_ORD_OE
    03       ACTVT
    11       DIS_CHANNE   ( the user is assigned to this dstrbtion channel in org structure)
              SALES_GROU
              SALES_OFFI
    SO1   SALES_ORG
              SERVICE_OR   ( the user is assigned to this sales org in org structure)
    And, when I try to display the LEADs in CRM UI ...I still get the display of LEADs belonging to all sales orgs.
    And my trace record  for CRM_ORD_LP is....
    CHECK_LEV    ' blank '
    PR_TYPE          LEAD
    ACTVT               03
    that means, it is not considering the auth value ' A ' for auth field  CHECK_LEV
    Could you please let me know ...how you have achieved this restriction . Is there anything , i m missing here?
    Thank You

  • OB52 based on Company Code

    Dear All,
           As we are having several company codes and want users only to be able to open and close periods from transaction code OB52 belonging to their posting period with respect to company codes how can I restrict and allow them open & close periods based on company code repectively. Is there any process this be done.
    I tried with the notes I got from one sap-img link. But it did not work & there something is missing. Kindly if anyone have done this before send be step by step process. Awaiting for you reply...
    regards,
    Raj B...

    How about trying it this way?
    1. Remove access to OB52
    2. Create a maintenance view similar to V_T001B specific for each company.
    3. Create a TCODE for each of these views.
    4. Use this TCODE for authorization assignment.
    This should be simple but your number of views would be increasing with respect to the number of companies.
    ~Eswar

  • Reason for change of Infotype Based on Company Code

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement where I need to restrict the F4 HELP in
    PA30 Transaction for the infotype 15  based on company code for the field reason for chagne.
    I know that reason for change of infotype are maintained in the table T530E.
    But can this be restricited through SPRO configuration.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    IFF

    Hi.
    It's possible to change the search helps with a search help exit.
    Take a look in SE11 for search help H_T530E.
    Search help exit
    A search help exit is a function module for making the input help process described by the search help more flexible than possible with the standard version.
    This function module must have the same interface as function module F4IF_SHLP_EXIT_EXAMPLE. The search help exit may also have further optional parameters (in particular any EXPORTING parameters).
    A search help exit is called at certain timepoints in the input help process.
    Note: The source text and long documentation of the above-specified function module (including the long documentation about the parameters) contain information about using search help exits.
    Function modules are provided in the function library for operations that are frequently executed in search help exits. The names of these function modules begin with the prefix F4UT_. These function modules can either be used directly as search help exits or used within other search help exits. You can find precise instructions for use in the long documentation for the corresponding function module.
    Regards.

  • Automatic assignment of Partner Function (Dealer) based on Postal Code?

    Hi Experts,
    We are realizing a project in the Bathroom-Product Industry. Responsible for the service to the end-clients are authorized dealer. When creating a service ticket the responsible dealer has to be assigned automatically to the ticket on the basis of the postal code where the IBase (the product) is installed.
    The process is:
    1. The client is calling the Interaction Centre and first the IC Agent has to identify the account and the Installed Base (The     installed base contains the postal code where the product of the client is installed) of this account.
    2. An Interaction Record is created to record this inbound call.
    3. Afterwards a Service Ticket is created as a follow-up Document of the Interaction Record. In the moment of the creation of the Service Ticket the correct dealer has to be assigned automatically to the Service Ticket (as a Partner Function not as a Service Organization) on the basis of the postal code of the installed base.
    I have the following question! Which are the steps to assign automatically a Business Partner Function to a Service Ticket? We also need to create a Z-Table with the postal codes for which every dealer is responsible.
    Example:
    Dealer 1 is responsible for the postal codes: 08040 - 08045 and 08056 - 08059. If a client is calling and his product (Installed Base) is installed in Postal Code 08042 or 08054 the dealer 1 has to be assigned to the service ticket.
    I hope I could make myself clear ;-)? Anybody can give me a hint how to do that? What are the basic steps?

    Slightly similiar, originally being an R/3 customer before implementing CRM our dealer equated to sales office.
    In the CRM Org model (PPOMA_CRM) in the attributes of the sales office we entered the Regions & Postal codes for that dealer (pain in the arse to do) and in CRM the sales office in the org creates a BP.
    We used a org rule for the IR record based on country, region, postal code to determine the appropriate sales org, DC, div, and sales office based onthe zip code.  We created a custom partner function to represent the partner number of the  BP from the org model.  Then we configured a custom relationship "ZORG" "Is partner of sales office" and went into the BP master and assigned the actual dealer number as a partner to BP from the org model that = sales office.  From that we configured a custom access sequence to pull the actual dealer number from the org model office relationships.
    We looked at territory management, but our dealer is an "org BP" and territory management appeared to want to drive to a person BP number.

  • Gl a/c short and long text based on company code

    Hello Friends,
    In table skat the gl account description is given based on chart of accounts but what if i want the description based on company code.
    I want the table where i can get the gl account description based on company code??
    Pls suggest.
    Regards,
    Sunny

    Hi,
    you can look at the database view for requirement
    GL_ACCT_CC_TEXT
    regards\
    Mahesh

  • Table for finding rate based on part code and material

    Hi Experts
         I am an ABAP consultant with ltd knowledge on SD . Please tell me in which table  I can find the rate based on party code and material .

    Hi
    The standard table is A305. But usually these tables can be customized based on the requirement. So if you are aware about the Condition type for which this Price/Rate is maintained you can find the same in VK13.
    In transaction code VK13, maintain the condition type and click on "Condition information" icon. Now dont maintain any input date. Just click on Execute icon or F8. System will give the list of all the tables and data maintained based on the combination.
    Select the required table.In SE11, maintain this table with prefix as A. You can get all the required information.
    Regards
    Vamsi

  • Can I get multiple sums in a single column based on a "code" I place.

    After importing a file of check/debit card activity from my bank, can I 'code' the line items based on tax categories ie Utilities, Medical expenses, Auto expenses, etc. and then get sums for each based on that code I placed in a single column? That would mean multiple sums in a single column based on the code used for each tax related expense. For instance, I would put UT in the column for utilities expenses and MED in the same column if it were a medical expense. I would then want the sum for all items in that column for each item code. Is this possible or do I need to use a different approach to get this information.

    My guess is that the SUMIF function may be your friend.
    It's well described in the *iWork Formulas and Functions User Guid*e which every user may download from the Help menu.
    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) samedi 2 janvier 2010 21:56:39

Maybe you are looking for