Why do illustrator vector objects render as pixelated in indesign?

Can anyone explain why if you place a graphic image or object created in illustrator into inDesign, the result is jagged, (pixelated) ie, highly rasterized. And I don't mean in a subtle way: the effect is very pronounced. Worse, it renders out on the pdf in the same way. And please, do not tell me this is a display issue. I am on High Quality display, that is not the answer. I also tried making a photoshop version of the object and placing that: no luck. And of all the forums I have wasted time reading, no one has provided a credible answer for this. I HAVE had good results from copying and pasting the vector paths into inDesign, but why oh why can't inDesign simply place the object directly? Hopefully, we will see a proper answer, and not just "it's a display issue."

> "I am on High Quality display"
Some things to check:
Display quality can be set at the application and object level. If object level display is enabled, is it set correctly for the illustration?
In the prefs, are all three sliders set all the way to the right?

Similar Messages

Ps CS6 Problem: Incorrect rendering of pasted Adobe Illustrator vector objects

Ps CS6 v13.0.1
OS X 10.6.8
Problem: Ps CS6 incorrectly renders vector objects pasted from Adobe Illustrator. CS5.1 does not exhibit the problem.
Below is screenshot of artwork in Illustrator and which is copied to clipboard, followed by screenshot of "Paste as Smart Object" in Ps CS5.1 then screenshot of same paste in CS6. "Paste as Pixels" gives identical good rendering in CS5.1 and poor rendering (gray pixels which should be pure white in this example) in CS6. This is repeatable with other artwork.
Several weeks ago there was a complaint in this forum that Photoshop CS6 poorly renders vector artwork that is pixel-aligned in Illustrator. The Adobe response was that Photoshop is correct. Strange that CS5.1 can render pasted vector artwork perfectly and only CS6 makes a mess.

What's the explanation for the following sequence?
1. Paste as Smart Object, at moment after pasting and before clicking the commit icon (no transform was made) in options bar. The object is rendered pixel-perfect.
2. After the commit. The object is poorly rendered with gray pixels which should be white.
3. Press Cmd+T for transform mode. The object is rendered pixel-perfect again.
4. After canceling transform mode, the object is poorly rendered again.

Illustrator vector object becomes less black in Photoshop

I drew an object, all black, in Illustrator, then placed it into Photoshop, the vector become less saturated than it was in Illustrator. Can anyone help me solve this problem?

Sulaco wrote:
You might also want to check "Edit/Preferences/Appearance of Black" in Illustrator. To deepen the black when printing (CMYK) you mix other colours into it, creating something called Rich Black. The mix could be something like C=50,M=50,Y=50,K=100, this will produce a blacker black than C=0,M=0,Y=0,K=100 (called 100K Black) when printing, it's desirable in certain situations.
Now "Appearance of Black" controls how black is displayed/printed/exported in Illustrator and I think that the default setting is "Display All Blacks As Rich Black" which means than if you use 100K Black in Illustrator and then transfer it to PS it might look less black in PS, depending on your settings.
It's one of those things that, even if new to CMYK, 100K black would look so wrong, you'd have to look into it and find out what the heck was going on
Sulaco, useful tip about pasting into Photoshop.

Why do vector objects use a different GUI to set colours?

While teaching Photoshop in a class of mine, I noticed that in CS6 vector objects's colours remain unaffected by the main colour controls, and we have to switch to the object selection tool to display the colour controls in the properties bar.
Now, this feels very, very disjointed - why would one introduce such a disconnect in the overall user interface? Why not just use the ordinary colour controls? I mean, trying to pick up the colour from a bitmap layer for a vector object takes five steps now: select object with object selection tool, click on the fill button in the properties bar, click on the colour picker, then we can pick up a colour from the image, anc finally click to confirm. And the colour change only gets applied after clicking "okay". No realtime feedback. Have to repeat the last three steps again and again to test for different colours.
Wow. Just... Wow. :-(
The Colour swatch palette does not work either with vector objects. Nor the eye dropper tool! Just plain silly, if you ask me.
Quite a bad workflow, or am I missing something here?
I compare this to Photoline, where the overall colour controls govern all types of objects, including vector layers and bitmap layers the same way, and with instant feedback. Photoshop CS6's colour picking workflow for vector objects looks extremely convoluted compared.
Has this workflow been improved at all in Photoshop CC?

@ JJMack: I used Photoshop in a professional manner since version 3, so I am sort of privy to its overall development throughout the years. ;-)
My intention is not to start a comparison between Photoline and Photoshop - both have their caveats and benefits. I stopped using Photoshop 9 months ago and switched to Photoline, and on overall, I much prefer PL's workflow now for image editing and compositing. (Comparing Elements with PL is not really a fair fight - PL's feature set, aside from the 3d, scripting, and video components, is 95% feature identical with Photoshop).
The main reason I still have Photoshop in my professional life is not due to missing features in the alternatives I now use compared to Photoshop (as a matter of fact the combined power of the alternatives are superior in terms of provided features), but merely because the students I teach are taught the "industry standard", and I keep up knowledge-wise.
Anyway, I am not expecting Photoshop to encompass the same functionality as Illustrator, nor do I want to compare Photoline's vector drawing tools to a dedicated vector illustration package. I am, however, experienced enough as a user (and a UX designer myself) to identify some very odd fragmented user interface behaviours in software.
The new vector shapes are a very welcome recent addition in PH, though I question the strange disconnected implementation.

Problem: Illustrator CS6 - print PostScript (fuzziness and blurring edges of vector objects)

Hello,
Earlier to print to the printer Develop Ineo+ 451 used the program Illustrator CS3. In connection with the transition to Windows 7 (64bit), was bought by a new version of Illustrator CS6 64bit. Unfortunately, when printing from Illustrator CS6 (price lists, business cards, labels) on a PostScript printer were detected problems, which were not in previous versions of Illustrator CS3.
A comparison of the print quality of the two programs Adobe Illustrator CS3 and Adobe Illustrator CS6, made on a PostScript
The software used on the computers:
1st PC: Windows XP SP2 (32bit), Adobe Illustrator CS3 (32bit), the driver Generic 50C-2SeriesPS v3.0.16.0 (32bit).
2nd PC: Windows 7 SP1 (64bit), Adobe Illustrator CS6 (64bit), the driver Generic 50C-2SeriesPS v3.0.16.0 (64bit).
Printer: Develop Ineo+ 451 (PostScript).
Drivers are available for download on the site www.chansi.ru
link http://download6.konicaminolta.eu/develop/public/&&BDV&RU&sw&&&&&0&&&0&&0&&0
(to choose Product Ineo + 452, for download tested version of the printer driver).
Because after using the new version of the driver, the print quality was not satisfactory, then for the correctness of the comparison experiment, already used driver version 50C-2SeriesPS v3.0.16.0 has been selected.
When you print from the program Adobe Illustrator CS6, a printer PostScript, you can see fuzziness and blurring edges of vector objects, small text becomes fuzzy and difficult to read. If you print from a program Adobe Illustrator CS3 (using the same version of the driver), there are not such problems and the print quality is quite satisfactory.
The settings in the dialog box "Print" of Adobe Illustrator and the print settings in the dialog boxes of the PostScript printer driver of Develop Ineo+ 451, were chosen exactly the same for both versions of the programs Adobe Illustrator CS3 and Adobe Illustrator CS6 on both operating systems!!!
(1) - http://hostingkartinok.com/show-image.php?id=ce3339ac2057e91a77a77b93ba129db2
(2) - http://hostingkartinok.com/show-image.php?id=0be6ec6a3e9d214b107525aedc59b7cb
P.s. Sorry for my English, use http://translate.google.ru/ and the help of friends

What's the explanation for the following sequence?
1. Paste as Smart Object, at moment after pasting and before clicking the commit icon (no transform was made) in options bar. The object is rendered pixel-perfect.
2. After the commit. The object is poorly rendered with gray pixels which should be white.
3. Press Cmd+T for transform mode. The object is rendered pixel-perfect again.
4. After canceling transform mode, the object is poorly rendered again.

Bought a new Canon MG7540 printer to replace the old HP A618. When printing vector objects from Illustrator, they look like graphics from dandy (8 bits) ... no smooth, all cubes ... if do raster than print perfectly. Who knows how to treat it? No well to

Bought a new Canon MG7540 printer to replace the old HP A618. When printing vector objects from Illustrator, they look like graphics from dandy (8 bits) ... no smooth, all cubes ... if do raster than print perfectly. Who knows how to treat it? No well to rasterize vector before each printing. OS - MacOs 10.10.

Have you read the User's Guide for that printer? Odds are you will get reasonable prints. However, it is a photographic printer. That said, it should print excellent quality photographic files. To get smooth lines in Illustrator, try Preferences > Use Anti-Aliased Artwork. That will smoothen the output. If, for some reason, that does not work, try Print > Save As PDF > open PDF in Reader and print from there. Check the User's Guide for media sizes available for your particular printer. Setup your artboard to the size page you want the image to print on. Use View > Show Page Tiling ( to see where the page's printable area lies. Align the page with the artboard using the Page tool.

Why does Illustrator CS5.5 crash when opening 1.5GB sized vector layered files on my iMac OS X?

Why does Illustrator CS5.5 crash when opening 1.5GB sized vector layered files on my iMac OS X?

1.5GB for a vector file is very large. If you can ever open this file would recomend file >> save as >> turn off PDF compatibility.
Can you please tell us why your file is so large, you may have a problem such as deleted global swatches, or an exceptionally large number of items in your symbols, styles, brushes palette. For even the most complex illustration filling the entire 227.54" artboard, you should be under 20mb if you have no embedded or linked images.

Why do images/vectors with effects get rasterised when clipped in Illustrator

Why do images/vectors with effects get rasterised when clipped in Illustrator@

Which version
which system?
What exactly did you do?
What exactly happened?
What exactly is wrong with that?
Can you show a screenshot?

Illustrator to Photoshop Smart Vector Object

After pasting a vector object into a PS file as a smart object, I thought I could double click to re-edit in Ilustrator.
It will only open as a PDF in PS. Am I missing something basic here or do I need to set a preference differently?
I am new to Ill, please help if you can.
Windows 7, CS5 Ill & PS.
Thanks for any help.
D

Thank you! The simple and correct answer. This is working for me now.
I am on Win7 so i right clicked on an Ill file and chose always use this program in the advanced section. It didn't show PDF as a default but Ill but after I have done this it is working as expected.
I am again a happy camper!
D

Vector objects are displayed incorrectly

Hi!
I am using Flash CS6. I need to draw a small vector icons (about 14x14).
Simple example: I draw a rounded rectangle with corner radius "2". Here is a resulting image from Flash (14x14, 100% scale):
As you can see, top corners are not drawed correctly, and bottom corners looks like radius is "1", not "2".
And here is what I expect (from Photoshop):
The same thing happens after importing icon from Illustrator to Flash as editable path - icon is distorted. But when I impoting it as bitmap - it looks exactly the same as in Illustrator. Only vector shapes showing incorrectly.
How can I fix it?

Neither of those appear to be vector objects as evidenced by the presence of pixels. I don't understand why you label them as 14x14 at 100%. If anything they are signicantly magnified. Below is a 14x14 vector rectangle with a corner rounding of 2 shown at 800% drawn in Flash CS3.

How do I prevent the Darker Shade Box (color shift) around Vector Objects when Printing

Sorry in advance for the novelette. I am absolutely mystified and frustrated and would love some help! I've been working on this problem for about 30 hours over the last 4 days to figure out what the heck is happening and cannot find an answer through various forms of research.
Basically, when I print a JPEG, I am getting this area (a box) of darker shaded coloring around my heart and love text. I've tested it a million different ways and am at a loss as to what the problem is ... is it an application problem, a color profile problem between my applications and printer, an improper way that I saved my file, etc.
Here is a photo I took of the image printed out (so it is slightly skewed from camera distortion):
The details:
(1) I create graphic art and sell it online. I save all of my printable art as JPEG files because of my customer base (diy hobbyists that print on their home printers without much knowledge base nor graphic design software).
(2) I use both Adobe Illustrator (AI) and Photoshop Elements 11 (PSE11) to design and save my artwork.
(3) I insert JPEG images into Microsoft Word 2003 documents to "test print" since most of my customers use home printers to print. Since most people have this basic software, it is a good gauge of the kind of print out they might get using the same or similar software.
(4) My PSE11 color profile setting is the default sRGB. I have test printed many times and I get the truest colors with this color profile.
(5) My AI color settings are normally also an sRGB color mode, but on occasion, I use a CMYK color mode if I am creating a larger document that I know the customer will need to take to a professional printer to print out.
(6) I do my home printing (for proofs) on an Epson Stylus Photo 1400 (which has the 6 color ink cartridges).
(7) Until this printing problem occurred on this test print out, I always used the "photo enhance" option when I designate settings for my printer via the Microsoft Word documents.
IMPORTANT: This is when I have the color shift?? or color rendering issues?? and it is the only time. If I use the regular ICM/ICC color profile of sRGB, the printing issue doesn't occur. Instead, I have a solid color background instead of this one with the strips of lighter color on the top and bottom. However, I can't control how the customer prints, so I need to feel confident that whatever color profile setting they use, they will not run into this problem. I even test printed the documents over at FedEx and the darker box/color shift did not occur.
(8) The document in question only has 3 sets of objects: the heart, the solid colored rectangle colored background and the text. All 3 objects are vectors, they are at 100% opacity and there are no "special effects" applied.
(9) The image was entirely created in AI this time and exported as a maximum quality JPEG file, although you will see below that I tried many ways to create and save the file so that I didn't have the color band borders on top/bottom.
(10) I regularly use AI for part of my art, then I drag it to my PSE11 open document and it becomes a Vector Object (it cannot by copying/pasting into a PSE11 document). I also regularly export AI images as PNG files, then insert them into an open PSE11 document. This printing issue has not occurred until recently. Here is an example of a very complex AI image I created, then inserted into PSE11 just to add the background (the Teddy Bear and books are AI vector objects) that were exported as PNG files then inserted into PSE11 to integrate with the background image - I test printed with Photo Enhance and had no printing issues:
So, from the research I have done, it looks like it is a color rendering or color space issue with conflicting color profiles in the same document. I checked my color profile settings and both sRGB and CMYK were set to embed ICC color profiles.
I tried changing AI settings to Preserve Numbers (ignore linked profiles) for CMYK, but that didn't work.
I also checked and made sure that not only the document setup showed the sRGB color profile, but that all the objects within the document also were converted to sRGB as well for consistency. That didn't work.
I tried converting the document to CMYK along with the vector objects. That didn't work.
I tried saving the heart image as a PNG file alone, the "love" text as a PNG file alone, both the heart and text together as a PNG files alone. Once saved as PNG files, I inserted them into an open empty PSE11 document - as I normally do. I then added the background color I wanted. That didn't work - the print still showed the color changes.
I tried dragging each vector object separately and even as a group and got the same color change issue when printing.
I tried "expanding" and "outlining" the text before exporting as JPEG, before exporting as a PNG and before dragging as a vector object into PSE11. Expanding the text did not help the situation.
I tried exporting as Adobe PDF, then opening in PSE11, then resaving as JPEG. That didn't work.
I tried flattening transparency (even though there is no transparency in the AI file). That didn't work.
I tried rasterizing the image. That didn't work.
Thinking that the file might be corrupt, I started from scratch and redesigned the same heart and love text. Unfortunately, I had the same problem as before. At this point, my AI started becoming buggy and would not open new files. It happened repeatedly and I decided it was best to uninstall and reinstall AI (and maybe that would fix the problem).
I created just the heart in AI, then inserted it into an open PSE11 document (both after exporting as PNG and also by dragging as Vector Object from AI). It seemed to work. I could both drag the vector into PSE11 from AI and export from AI as a PNG, then insert into open PSE11 document with a background color - and it printed a solid background.
So, I thought that reinstalling and setting back to defaults worked. But, then I added the love text around the heart and tried exporting as JPEG files and the same problem continued to recur. Whether I dragged as a Vector object into PSE11 (the heart object and love text separately and also another time with the vector objects dragged as a group) or saved them as PNG files and inserted into PSE11 - I got the different shades of color on what should be a solid background. I even tried saving the PSE11 as a PSD file first, then resaving as JPEG and I tried saving as PNG and printing and this didn't help solve the problem.
I really think it is some color conflict issue but I can't figure it out. I am definitely not very knowledgeable about color profiles and how to sync all my devices, however, as I mentioned, this was not an issue until recently (and I think??? I recall changing the CMYK setting from Preserve Numbers to embed color profile a month or so ago - however, it should have been solved when AI went back to its defaults upon reinstall).
The reason I believe it is a color rendering/color space issue is because I could see the color output when I saved the JPEG with CMYK color profile versus sRGB color profile and the sRGB colors were much richer, not surprisingly. The top and bottom colors matched the sRGB printout and the middle darker box section matched the CMYK printout.
I am sure it is something fundamental or simple and I am completely overlooking it. I wish it were just a transparency issue, because people know how to fix or do workarounds for it. But, there are no vector objects with any transparency ...
If I missed some detail, I apologize. Any help would be a dream come true at this point! lol
Thank you!

Okay, I got motivated to try again. From doing a bit more research on troubleshooting AI printing problems, the Adobe article talks about print drivers. It was advised to uninstall and reinstall the print driver if the printing issue persists. So, I did. Unfortunately, I still had the same result after reinstalling and trying a test print! Ugh.
So, as Jacob said upfront, I seem to have an overactive print driver that is trying too hard (and it is a non-postscript printer which I realize is part of the problem).
There are so many variables in my situation as to how I create art and save/export art. I sometimes work solely in AI, sometimes solely in PSE and sometimes I use both programs to create. Consequently, I will:
(1) export directly from AI as JPEG if I am not adding PSE11 artwork.
(2) export directly from AI as PNG if I plan on inserting that image into PSE11 to add to artwork I have created in PSE11.
(3) drag vector objects as a Smart Objects directly from AI to PSE11 to add to artwork I am creating in PSE11 if I know I will playing with the vector object and resizing in PSE11.
So, I did a test print using scenario 2, where I inserted the heart and love text PNG (AI created vector object) into an old PSE11 document. This old document already had a vector object from AI with a solid background and I knew it printed correctly. So, after inserting this new PNG from AI into this old document, it printed correctly using the photo enhance mode.
However, I haven't had a chance to actually create new art in the older AI files (that I know print properly), resave as something else and try another test print (either by exporting as JPEG and printing in Word or by exporting as PNG file and inserting into PSE11 document, then saving as JPEG and printing in Word).
After testing the different possibilities of ICM settings within my printer, I found that the JPEG images printed out with the truest colors and best quality if I simply selected "no color management" from the printer. Shocker, huh? lol
MY SOLUTION: So, what I think I will simply do is add an instruction sheet with the printables I sell, explaining that the color profile setting should never be handled by the printer so make sure to turn off color management by printer (and if they feel they must use the printer for color management, make sure the setting is sRGB since I embed that color profile in my JPEG's).
Edited to add: Since my issue was never about how I could print a successful image (I knew I could simply change the color profile settings), but rather about how to make sure that customers would get consistent and high quality print outputs of my digital images, this seems like the best approach.
I don't think I will every really know exactly why I am now getting color shifts in the "photo enhance" mode when I did not have this problem a couple months ago - applying the same methods of creating artwork. I was concerned that I was saving/exporting using incorrect or mismatched color settings or something of that nature. However, since I went through the process of making my color spaces the same for everything, and I still have issue, clearly that is not the culprit. The only thing I can do to solve the problem and it is a straightforward solution anyway -> is to educate the buyer on how to print successfully (don't use photo enhance! ha ha).
Thanks again to everyone who chimed in and offered advice!

Editing Vector Objects in PDF

When I use the Touch-up Object tool to select a vector element in a PDF and right click to Edit Object the object opens in Illustrator. This is the program I have set in preferences to edit vector objects. The issue I have is when I edit and save the object it shows up in the PDF shifted from its original position (offset to the upper left). How can I get the object to update in the PDF without shifting position?

Yes and No. You have the most up-to-date version of Acrobat 8.1 and
Illustrator, so the bug should have been fixed. I cannot say why it is
not working for you. Of course, the latest version of Acrobat is 9.0,
but I don't think you need to upgrade for the fix. Maybe someone can
chime in. What happens if you create a new file in Illy and create a
pdf, does the problem still happen?
Mike

Enlarging raster vs vector Objects

as i understand it vector objects should enlarge without losses, while
raster objects pixilate on enlargement.
In this image
http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/6178/triangleswithrastercz0.gif the
top triangle is raster. The bottom one is vector. Otherwise the two
are identical. I stretched both about 15 fold using transform. They
are identical. If you magnify them to 800 times actual size the
pixilation is the same. So, the raster image enlarged exactly the
same as the vector image??????

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:15:26 -0700, [email protected]
wrote:
>Plus...don't forget that the monitor screen you're looking at...and the printer you're printing to...render their result on a grid of pixels/dots as well.
>
>The difference is that scaling a vector graphic re-renders the same mathematical formula at the new size, whereas scaling a raster requires pixel-based interpolation, which must either throw pixels away, (scaling down), or manufacture new pixels, (scaling up).
Somehow I'm not being clear. I understand the difference between
vector and raster objects/images. My point is, theoretically upsizing
a vector image should give a different (better/cleaner/smoother )
result than resizing a raster image. Yet, in my example upsampling
by a factor of 15 times showed no difference.

Illustrator vector files look blurred when zoomed on in in AE

I just have text from a illustrator file, imported in to after after effects. When I scale the text, the quality isn't affect, but when i zoom in, the text is blurred, I have the continuously rasterize box clicked, and it's still blurred.
How can I fix this problem? Thanks

> I mean when I scale the text up it doesn't get affected, just when I zoom.
That's not actually a problem. That's normal. When you scale a layer with continuous rasterization, the vector information is converted into a new set of pixels to make things sharp. When you just zoom in a preview, you're not actually changing any pixels in the composition; you're just zooming in on the existing pixels for a closer look.
from After Effects Help:
"Note: After Effects renders vector objects before zooming (scaling for preview), so some vector objects may appear jagged when you zoom in on them. This apparent pixelation for zooms does not affect scaling of layers or rendering to final output. "

Is it possible to create vector objects as compound shapes as you draw them (automatically)?

I'd like to start utilizing Illustrator more frequently for web and user interface design projects, but I still like taking everything into Photoshop for final rendering and compositing (and the simple fact that most developers want psds, not ai files). However, I find that the only way to successfully transfer all of the vector artwork from Illustrator and preserve it as vector objects in Photoshop (when exporting) is to manually convert every individual vector object in Illustrator to a Compound Shape (by selecting the shape and clicking Make Compound Shape from the Pathfinder palette menu). This can be very tedious if it has to be done after the design is complete, and very inefficient if you convert every object as you draw it.
Is there a way to set Illustrator to automatically create every vector object drawn as a Compound Shape without having to manually convert it?
A little background on this issue...
Adobe Illustrator allows you to export your Illustrator document as a Photoshop document. However, Compound Paths (not Compound Shapes - see this article for not-so-great explanations comparing the two) – which is the default attribute applied to all of Illustrator's basic vector objects – do not convert into vector objects when the exported document is opened in Photoshop. Rather, the vector objects drawn in Illustrator get flattened into raster layers in Photoshop, making them poor candidates for refining the design in Photoshop.

Two possibilities:
Start with a simple Compound Shape and use it as the beginning of each new path:
Polygon Tool: Mousedown. Drag. Tap the down arrow key until you have a triangle. Mouseup.
White Pointer: Click one of the sides of the triangle. Delete. (Now you have a 2 segment open path.)
Fill: Any color. Stroke: None.
Pathfinder palette flyout menu: Make Compound Shape.
Drag the path to just beyond the artboard origin (or some other convenient location).
Copy.
Each time you begin a new path, start it by either doing a Paste (Ctrl V), or by AltDragging a copy of the original. Then start modifying the pasted path, which is already a Compound Shape.
OR
Use an Action (macro) to apply the Make Compound Shape after you have drawn the paths:
Draw two paths. Select the first one.
Actions palette: Start recording.
Pathfinder palette flyout menu>Make Compound Shape.
Select>Next Object Above.
Stop recording.
Now when you've finished a drawing:
Layers palette: Select the bottom object.
Actions palette: Repeatedly click the Action Run button (or put the palette in Button Mode and repeatedly click its button).
As with everything in Illustrator, caveats abound:
Why there's no loop command for Actions is beyond me. So if you want, you can duplicate the two steps in the Action, say, nine times so it will convert 10 paths per click.
Using the Action method, the Select>Next Object Above command will not jump between Layers. So if the paths are on various Layers, you'll have to manually do the bottom object select for each Layer.
As you probably know, if the Illustator Compound Shapes have strokes, not just fills, the resulting Photoshop Shape Layers have the paths, but loose the fills and strokes. So either method above works best if the Illustrator paths are filled and unstroked before converting to Compound Shapes.
Illustrator's Javascript considers a Compound Shape a PluginItem. So it's conceivable that one could script the conversion of a simple path to a Compound Shape by using the sendScriptMessage() method of the app object. But you'd have to know the appropriate parameters for the plugin, which I don't.
If only you could invoke an Action from an Illustrator Javascript, you could simply use a Javascript to intelligenty loop through the objects and run the Action for each...but that's another big "if only".
JET

Why do illustrator vector objects render as pixelated in indesign?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for