Why is ios getting worse rather than better

Why is ios getting worse rather than better?

It is. Why wont complete my album actually complete my album and put the songs in the same folder. Why oh why have apple sent google packing, why is the maps app so rubbish just for a starter

Similar Messages

  • When I click on a website in my reading list, why does top sites open rather than the site I've clicked on?

    When I click on a website in my Reader list in Safari, why does Top Sites open rather than the website I've clicked on?

    Go step by step and test.
    Reset Safari.
    Click Safari in the menu bar.
    From the drop down select "Reset Safari".
    Click "Reset".
    Delete Cookies
    Safari > Preferences > Privacy > Cookies and other website data:
    Click “Remove All Website Data”.
    Empty Caches
    Safari > Preference > Advanced
    Checkmark the box for "Show Develop menu in menu bar".
    Develop menu will appear in the Safari menu bar.
    Click Develop and select "Empty Caches" from the dropdown.
    Turn off Extensions if any, and launch Safari.
    Safari > Preferences > Extensions

  • WHY WE GO FOR SESSION RATHER THAN LSMW ?

    WHY WE GO FOR SESSION RATHER THAN LSMW  , AND I WANT TO KNWO THE DIFFERANCES BETWEEN THEM AND IN WICH CONDITIONS  SESSION AND LSMW ARE  MOST SUTED? THANKING U

    hi,
    In BDC ,we can run session as per our need, you can run in foreground ,background or even you can run on periodic wise ,where as in LSMW
    you cant run as your wish .
    BDC (Batch Data Communication) is a technology used for data transfer. it is meant for transferring data thru SAP transactions itself. when u use BDC for data transfer, the sequence of steps is the same as when u use standard sap transaction screens for data upload. the only difference is that u can use different options for foreground/backgrou nd processing.
    LSMW on the other hand is a tool that helps migrate data from a legacy system (non-sap system ) to SAP system. it offers u various options to use either batch input, direct input, BAPIs or idocs. it involves a series of some 17-18 steps to migrate data.
    BDC:
    Batch Data Communication (BDC) is the process of transferring data from one SAP System to another SAP system or from a non-SAP system to SAP System.
    Features :
    BDC is an automatic procedure.
    This method is used to transfer large amount of data that is available in electronic medium.
    BDC can be used primarily when installing the SAP system and when transferring data from a legacy system (external system).
    BDC uses normal transaction codes to transfer data.
    Types of BDC :
    CLASSICAL BATCH INPUT (Session Method)
    CALL TRANSACTION
    BATCH INPUT METHOD:
    This method is also called as ‘CLASSICAL METHOD’.
    Features:
    Asynchronous processing.
    Synchronous Processing in database update.
    Transfer data for more than one transaction.
    Batch input processing log will be generated.
    During processing, no transaction is started until the previous transaction has been written to the database.
    CALL TRANSACTION METHOD :
    This is another method to transfer data from the legacy system.
    Features:
    Synchronous processing. The system performs a database commit immediately before and after the CALL TRANSACTION USING statement.
    Updating the database can be either synchronous or asynchronous. The program specifies the update type.
    Transfer data for a single transaction.
    Transfers data for a sequence of dialog screens.
    No batch input processing log is generated.
    LSMW:
    The LSM Workbench is an R/3-based tool that supports You when transferring data from non-SAP systems ("Legacy Systems") to R/3 once or periodically.
    The tool supports conversion of data of the legacy system in a convenient way. The data can then be imported into the R/3 system via batch input, direct input, BAPIs or IDocs.
    Furthermore, the LSM Workbench provides a recording function that allows to generate a "data migration object" in an entry or change transaction.
    The main advantages of the LSM Workbench:
    • Part of R/3 and thus independent of individual platforms
    • A variety of technical possibilities of data conversion:
    • Data consistency due to standard import techniques:
    Batch input
    Direct input
    BAPIs (Business Application Programming Interfaces)
    IDocs (Intermediate Documents)
    The import technique to be used in an individual case depends on the business object.
    • Generation of the conversion program on the basis of defined rules
    • Clear interactive process guide
    • Interface for data in spreadsheet format
    Reward points if this helps you.
    Siva

  • Why should i use JSF rather than Struts?

    What makes JSF useful than Struts? In my project I am using like
    <h:commandButton action="#{loginbean.execute}" actionListener="#{loginbean.handleEvent}" ..../>
    In the above commandButton as you can see that i am not exposing the beanName. However i am exposing the beanMethod which are execute and handleEvent. Is there any other way to hide the name of the method because
    From what i understand is Presentation Layer should be shielded from whatever is going on in the backend. So, this doesn't do good right?
    Please suggest.
    How does Component and Renderers help. I am using encodeEnd() method in Renderer to render what the input or the output should look like. Do we need to switch to JSF from Struts just because of this... I don't see how and why components and renderers could help me..

    srikanthradix wrote:
    What makes JSF useful than Struts? In my project I am using like
    <h:commandButton action="#{loginbean.execute}" actionListener="#{loginbean.handleEvent}" ..../>
    In the above commandButton as you can see that i am not exposing the beanName. However i am exposing the beanMethod which are execute and handleEvent. Is there any other way to hide the name of the method because
    From what i understand is Presentation Layer should be shielded from whatever is going on in the backend.You can use "binding" and define everything in Java code if you want. You can rename your method to reflect what you want to see in the front end if you want. You can use JSFTemplating to use handlers which can be mapped to any name you want to see and do not have to match the method name of the java class (although I suspect this is the opposite direction from what you are suggesting you want).
    EL in jsf (i.e. #{bean.login}) is meant to do the mapping in JSF pages rather than externalize this in a separate file and force the page developer to edit multiple files for simple tasks. Although in some cases navigation is broken out into a separate file (i.e. faces-config.xml file using the default NavigationHandler navigation rules), this can also be done inline. It's a different way of doing development and has its pros and cons (easier, but mixes up presentation and controller somewhat). That said... JSF is very flexible, it CAN externalize any of this information, it just requires you to provide a different ViewHandler information that allows you to enter the data the way you like to see it (imo, you won't realize any benefit from the separation, though -- I used to think it was worth doing but have changed my opinion).
    So, this doesn't do good right?Perhaps in theory... but in practice, I don't think it really has a drawback. One caveat, I like how I implemented event handling in JSFTemplating as opposed to action/actionListener attributes which are not configurable and are more opaque than I prefer. My parameterized handlers allow for better code-reuse, but arguably mix up presentation and controller code even more (depending on how they're used).
    Please suggest.
    How does Component and Renderers help. I am using encodeEnd() method in Renderer to render what the input or the output should look like. Do we need to switch to JSF from Struts just because of this... I don't see how and why components and renderers could help me..The idea of a component helps tremendously as someone else can create a component for you and you can benefit from it. There are many great component sets available on the market (for free and for purchase). For example: Woodstock (which has drag/drop support inside NetBeans), RichFaces, IceFaces, Tomahawk, Scales, etc.
    Renderers allow you to cleanly separate the presentation of a component with the data of the component. You can then switch out the presentation to support multiple markups (i.e. client devices). In addition, JSF's rich lifecycle provide logical places for certain types of operations to occur, the renderers participate in this so that they are performing their tasks at a well defined time. And finally, many different components may re-use the same renderer, or a single component may use one of several renderers. The separation of data and display (model and view) makes this very clean.
    JSF is not Struts. If you expect it to be struts, you may be disappointed (or if you expect struts to be JSF, you'll be disappointed). JSF has a lot to offer (as does struts), you have to decide what is important to you and your organization. Some things to consider wrt to JSF: very strong vendor support; many large set of components to choose from; multiple standards-based tools to choose from; very flexible (most parts of the framework are pluggable); active growing development community; component-based model which encapsulates complexity for things like Ajax, pagination, and other things (often complicated in a non-component architecture); good integration with other frameworks.
    I don't know if this makes your decision any easier, but hopefully it helps clarify how you should be viewing JSF & Struts.
    Good luck!
    Ken Paulsen
    https://jsftemplating.dev.java.net

  • How to get vertical rather than horizontal plan?

    Hi
    Witha complex site layout plan  it would be easier for me if child pages were shown in a vertical rather than a horizontal array.
    The horizontal array makes for much scrolling across the screen and seems to use too much visual real estate.
    How can this be changed?
    Also is there no way to show notes alongside each page in the plan?
    Thanks in advance
    David

    Hi
    Usually staff answers are thoughtful and helpful - on this occasion I find the response to be rather simplistic and narrow minded.
    1. There is no logical reason why a website could not be built irrespective of the way the planning mode controls it screen layout. After all that is what computers are really good at - separating logic from view. The only thing needed is a view modifier and I am really surprised that anyone would state with such confidence: "It can't hence, be changed in the plan mode"
    2. When each sibling can be presented in a vertical rather than a horizontal plane it would facilitate visualisation, especially for complex sites,
    3. No thought in the program design seems to have been given to the benefits which could arise from vertical presentation for printing purposes. We also need to be able to print siblings and the ability to be able to print out the site plan in vertical segments by sibling would be an invaluable planning tool.
    4. No response has been made to the need to be able to attach notes (maybe using a "notes" layer?
    Come - lets have a more thoughtful response. Like all software Muse is a work in progress and that, IMHO, is very true of Muse,. This program has a lot of potential but much needs to be done to approach a level of maturity that harmonises with other Adobe products. The absence of an inbuilt database management facilities is only one of many striking omissions which signal insufficient commitment and determination to fulfill that potential within a reasonable time frame.
    david

  • Why is Firefox getting WORSE with each new version? The new version eleven crashes my PC about every 15 minutes! Back to I.E.!

    The new version 11 crashes my entire PC causing a total restart about every 15 minutes and I have tried everything to fix this problem with no luck so I have now went back to I.E. aat least it doesnt crash and i can watch Youtube vids without hanging up every 30 seconds!
    Each new version of Firefox seems to be WORSE than the one before, crashing my entire system is my biggest issue at this point! Some of the older versions seemed stable so what and why has the developers tptally ruined this browser? I am not the only person with these problems I see forums full of users complaining so why isnt the developers putting out a stable browser?
    Firefox needs to GET ON THE BALL and get a stable browser out for all of its lowal users this is totally rediculous! I am VERY PISSED OFF!

    Whatever you do, don't get version 12 because it's just as bad as the rest. Not responding, not responding is what I see most of the time. I'm tired of looking at that blue circle spinning.
    I thought Firefox is suppose to be tops but I've had more problems with it than I had with IE. It literally takes minutes for some pages to load. Tabs and pages open by themselves from who knows where.
    The updates and new versions go from bad to worse. I scan my computer several times a week with MSE, Malwarebytes, Spybot and SuperAntispyware, thinking that it might help and it doesn't.
    This is pathetic. Firefox, please get someone in there who knows what the heck they are doing. It seems like instead of bug fixes, someone's putting in some bugs.
    No one should have to repeatedly do this:
    1. Restart your computer
    2. Clear your cookies and cache
    3. Update your plugins
    4. Restart Firefox in Safe Mode
    5. Troubleshoot your plugins
    6. Reset your Firefox settings
    7. Reinstall Firefox
    8. Make a new profile
    Other solutions
    Check for conflicts with your Internet security software
    Scan your system for viruses and spyware
    Check your hard drive for errors

  • Why is skype getting worse .

    I have been using skype for approximately six years and each day call relatives and friends for video chat One in particular I call every day . When I first started calling this person with skype we could chat for an hour or more with perfect sound and picture . However over time this had deteriorated , we have both upgraded to faster more  modern computers and updated our internet providers for faster more reliable internet . However we constantly get dropouts and messages saying our internet is too slow for good video .we even have dropouts when just using voice , We  now have computers running windows 8 with highspeed broadband connections to the internet but we still have the same problems That the heck is going on we are now looking into alternative VOIP programs and will dump skype if it gets any worse .

    dongningprc wrote:
    Edited to conform with the Community Guidelines
    10. Be courteousYou are expected to maintain a helpful, respectful tone when posting. Opinions are welcome, but they may not escalate into flaming against Skype, its staff, other community members or any other party. 
    Have to say, great job.  Really sounds like USSR is back to life.  Don't know what COMMUNISM is all about? This is it.
    yes dont say anything bad about Microsoft they will edit it out so much for freedom of speach C"mon all you software developers out there ,come up with a viable alternative to Skype so we can all go over to your service and ditch this piece of MICROSOFT Garbage after all Bill Gates doesnt give a rats ring he has made his Billions 

  • Mail - why does it use Firefox rather than the default, Safari?

    Hi,
    I have both Safari and Firefox on this iMac that's running 10.6.8.  Safari is my default browser.
    Within Mail Preferences, the Default RSS Reader is set up to use Safari.  However,  Mail always links to Firefox.  Why is this and how do I change it?
    Thank you,
    reluctantuser

    Nevermind, I've figured it out!
    Thanks,
    reluctantuser

  • Why is Firefox getting worse an worse with every update???

    Bugs (like the "Download&Crash"-bug) are never fixed, but a lot of useful addons do not work suddenly!
    It has become a nightmare!
    You shold take more care of these problems.
    I'm no longer willing to make my yearly donation under these circumstances. Sorry...

    ReneMacon, I am sorry to hear about the frustration. Some add ons become incompatible after updates. However contacting the developers of these add ons can further investigate the issue.

  • Why the singleton pattern used rather than static things?

    class Single
        private Single() {}
        private void print() { System.out.println("Foo~"); }
        private static Single one = new Single();
        public static void print() { one.print(); }
    class Stat
        public static void print() { System.out.println("Foo~"); }
    }What's the different?? What is the benefit of the singleton one?

    There is no practical difference - because, in fact, that is not the singleton pattern!
    A singleton would look like:
    class Singleton {
        private Singleton() {}
        public void print() { System.out.println("Foo~"); }
        private static Singleton instance = new Singleton();
        public static Singleton getInstance() { return instance; }
    }The benefit of this pattern is, that your client code doesn't have to know that there is only one instance (getInstance could return another instance for every call) or of which actual type it is (getInstance could return an instance of any Subclass of Singleton).
    See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?SingletonPattern for more information on the pattern.

  • Why we used tiff files rather than other files

    hi experts can u tell me for this

    Hi
    SAPscript technology is based on a mainframe product from the 1980s, while Smart Forms have only been around since (roughly) 2001. With that sort of time gap, there are bound to be significant differences between the two tools. Client dependence is a fundamental one. Although SAPscript has had some incremental improvements over time, its forms have always been -- under the hood -- relatively ...
    So Script is designed such that it accepts only .tiff fiels unlike smartforms
    So it is a must to use/convert the BMP fiels into .tiff fiels and to use in scripts
    To create a logo in SAP printouts just do the following
    1. Save a Logo using Imaging, Paint shop Pro or Corel Draw as Tiff file.
    2. Run  program RSTXLDMC and enter the following parameters
       Enter file name                     C:\COMPLOGO.TIF
       UOM                           CM
        Line width for text                132
        Text name                     ZHEX-MACRO-COMPLOGO
        Text ID                          ST
        Text language = E
        Number of Tiff gray levels (2,4,9) 2
    3.  Then Create a new window 'COMP' with attributes;
    Window COMP description Company Logo
    Left margin 7.00 CH window width 10.00 CH
    Upper margin LN window height 8.00 LN
    Finally in the text element, mention
            /: INCLUDE 'ZHEX-MACRO-COMPLOGO' OBJECT TEXT ID ST LANGUAGE 'E'.
    Please note that if object name is not indicated as 'ZHEX...’ the logo may not be printed!
    You will not be able to see the logo in a test print. The same will be printed in actual printout.
    <b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>
    Regards
    Anji

  • Why do I get # rather than £ signs in Discoverer?

    When I display text in a formula column in Discoverer i get # signs rather than £'s e.g. Under#80k

    Hi Chris
    That would make sense. As with most things Discoverer when a workbook is saved just about all of the variables are saved with it. You may well have to rebuild the workbooks.
    Before doing that though try opening one of the offending workbooks and resaving it. You should then exit Discoverer, reconnect and reopen the workbook. If this results in the correct output then voila - eureka no problem. If it doesn't then a rebuild of the workbook looks like your only option.
    Best wishes
    Michael

  • Why aperture rather than photoshop? Please help!

    Hi everybody, I have a noisy question in my mind. Today I have bought an apple pro training manual for Aperture. I work with photos, I am a photographer and today I have done my first steps into the world of aperture.
    I was happy using it, learning lesson by lesson but than my friend asked me : "I do not know photographer who use Aperture. they just use Photoshop, why do you want to learn it?". I said "well...."
    Now the question is : why shall I use Aperture rather than Photoshop? what does it gave me more or different than Photoshop? I know that I can easily handle RAW formats and I know the "nondestructive" thing, but...
    I really would like to have an opinion from you.

    rmrpix,
    i have read your "5% photoshop theory" before in some
    other threads, and in my (humble) opinion, this is
    wrong. for me, only the combination of both, aperture
    AND photoshop make it work. aperture is perfect for
    managing the images etc. however before any of our
    photo is used/released/printed, we run it through
    photoshop. even a near perfect image can be improved.
    and such changes can (to use your 95/5% theory) in
    95% of the cases only be achieved with photoshop.
    so for me it's the combination of both - and on a
    personal note - i love aperture, but couldn't work
    without photoshop.
    Steebow,
    Neither could I work without Photoshop, and I agree that any image, no matter how perfect, CAN be improved in Photoshop. But my point is why do that unless the image absolutely needs it? Where does a little image improvement cost too much in post-processing time and effort? Let me give you an example:
    Let's say I have a shoot of 250 photos from a corporate or community event. I shoot a lot of events like golf tournaments, community and corporate functions, so that's what I'll use as my example. I recognize this size shoot (as well as the client requirements) may be far less than some posters shoot for typical weddings or other assignments, but it's still a decent batch of images.
    Out of these 250 images, I might throw out 40-50 at image ingestion - they are too flawed to merit ANY post processing.
    Out of the remaining 200 or so I might find 50-60% that are not "proof image quality", either because:
    1) they have some flaw that is not bad enough for discard, but not good enough for "proof quality"; or
    2) they are near duplicates of the same image, taken to make sure no one is blinking, or to bracket exposures, or as part of a sequence to catch a candid action/facial expression, etc.
    I don't discard these images, documenting them with metadata and keeping them in Aperture for a complete record of the shoot. But I don't perform ANY post processing on them, in either Aperture or Photoshop.
    The remaining 80-100 images will be submitted to the client as proofs. For proof purposes - and I make this clear to my clients - I perform ONLY global image processing - straighten the horizons, globally adjust tones and colorcast, occasionally adding a bit of highlight-shadow adjustment or sharpening (over the default Raw Fine Tuning paramaters if the image needs it.) All of this can be done quite adequately in Aperture. The proofs are submitted as low res images on contact sheets, CD/DVD, or - more and more frequently - on a private access web page. Why should I "Photoshop" the images more at this stage? What value does that add for the time expended?
    A typical client for my practice is using the images for flyers, newsletters, perhaps an occasional annual report. So the client select rate is perhaps 1-in-5 to 1-in-6, possibly lower. In this example that's maybe maybe 15-25 images out of 250 taken. Many (but not all) of these client selects may require Photoshop to produce finals, depending on the clients output needs. (If they only need 1/4 page B&W images for a newsletter, I will usually do this in Aperture.) So for this type of shoot I hit Photoshop for maybe 6-10% of the original images. Even then I make extensive use of batch processing actions to minimize Photoshop "mouse time".
    Everyone's business (or personal style) is different, but I'm convinced that careful workflow/digital asset management will in the end reduce, not expand Photoshop processing time. Having, like most, started out trying to "Photoshop" everything I shot, (the "After all, that is MY IMAGE and I want to make it perfect" syndrome), I learned long before Aperture was released that careful image capture, even more careful image evaluation, and always thinking about efficiency of workflow, is the best way to spend less time in front of the monitor so I can spend more time behind the camera. To me, and for my uses, that means using Photoshop when I need it and not a minute more. But YMMV.
    Mike
    PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0GHz, Radeon X800XT Graphics Card; MacBookPro 2.0Ghz   Mac OS X (10.4.6)   iMac800 and Powerbook G4 also in household

  • Blend complete rather than Move complete?

    After I issue an absolute move on a closed loop stepper axis with PCI-7344 using flex_Start, the Move Complete bit never gets set, but the Blend complete bit does. Since, I'm waiting in a loop for the Move Complete bit, the program (VB 6.0) hangs. Why would the Blend Complete bit get set rather than the Move Complete bit?

    You might want to check first that you have the latest NI-Motion 5.2 driver. Then, check your Move Complete Criteria because it might have all the conditions disabled hence never gets a flag. Blend Complete checks also for a Motor Stop and Profile Complete bits to be set and then it sets itself. Anyways, focus on why the Move Complete Criteria does not flags, the NI-Motion Software Reference Manual will show which function to use to set it up and the bitmap order. If you need further assistance on this issue I would recommend you to contact NI Support, www.ni.com/ask.
    Nestor S.
    Nestor
    National Instruments

  • If I have two appointments at the same time, they overlap in the iOS 7 calendar rather then appearing side-by-side so that I can't read one of them due to the identical colors of the two appointments.  Is there any way to fix this with a setting?

    If I have two appointments at the same time, they overlap in the iOS 7 calendar rather than appearing side-by-side in the daily view, so that I can' read both of them due to the same background color.  Is there a way to change this via a settings change?

    I fyou have "all day" event that are taking up the entire day, check the event. All day event only appear at the top of the time line (and just below the week view). I suspect they are not actually set up as all day, but have specific time frames assigned.
    In teh screen shot below, "Sample" is an all day event; NFL: CAR@SF is not.

Maybe you are looking for