Why is member count 100 for all users sccm collection

hello,
I have SCCM 2012 SP1 -4, and have enabled user discovery but "all users" collection does not goes above 100 member count.
I do have more 1500 users in AD, all related setting are at default.
Disable \enabling was no help, 
no component shows warning or error.
Thanks

Hi. what about adusrdis.log? and are you correctly configuring AD user discovery? see this for example
http://www.windows-noob.com/forums/index.php?/topic/4428-using-sccm-2012-rc-in-a-lab-part-3-configuring-discovery-and-boundaries/

Similar Messages

  • Why does Firefox 31 change all PDF icons and opening in browser, require a fix using REGEDIT to fix for ALL USERS on a computer?

    The solution to use REGEDIT in the question linked below almost fixed my trouble with PDF files on over 30 computers, with several users on each computer:
    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1013642
    But I needed to fix it for ALL users on a computer, without logging onto each account, on each computer. My fix was to logon as administrator and change the following system-global key instead:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Classes\.pdf
    Name: Default
    Type: Reg_SZ
    Data: FirefoxHtm
    Changed the data from FirefoxHtm to AcroExch.Document.11
    I use Adobe Reader XI on Win7 Pro, 64-bit machines.
    The problem started when I ran a downloaded file to install the new version of Firefox on the computers.
    Why would Firefox require me to use REGEDIT in this manner to fix the problem?

    This only happens when you set Firefox as the default browser and Firefox thinks that there is currently no application the handles PDF files.

  • Read-Only cell for all users

    Hi,
    We're running an 11.1.1.2 Planning application.  A member in the Account dimension is read-only for all users including the Admin account.
    The member is read only when accessed through a Data Form or through Smart View.
    We addressing the Account dimension at level 0 on the data form.
    The member is not Dynamic.
    The member is only locked for EUR and GBP currencies.
    The member has previously been moved to a new location in the Account dimension however we have run multiple database refreshes since the move.
    Let me know if you need any more info.  Any help which can be provided would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Jim

    Hyperion Planning and More...: Why My Data Form is Still Read Only...!!!
    See if any of the points mentioned here is any help.
    Cheers..
    Rahul S.

  • Why won't garageband work for second user account

    I have recently had new hard drive installed in my iMac, after a lot of time recovering everything I have my main (admin) user account working fine, including garageband 11 working fine after having to go through the unistall and delete all the library files work around. But now when I add a second user account for my kids, i get the same problem I had earlier. It shouldn't be the same thing because all of those files were deleted. I have cleared out the lirary files in the ~user library as well just in case but still the same issue. I get the warning that garageband needs to download files to work, it seemingly downloads all the files, then installs them, gets to 100% installed and then crashes.

    . I get the warning that garageband needs to download files to work, it seemingly downloads all the files, then installs them, gets to 100% installed and then crashes.
    This looks like GarageBand is trying to install the additional content - loops, instruments - for  the new users all over again as well. This should not happen. All loops and instruments should have been installed in the system library for all users and not in your user library for you alone. Or there may be a permissions problem with the system library. Did you install all additional contents from an administrator account or a regular user account without administrator privileges?

  • Unable to change keyboard layout for all users on Windows Server 2012 R2

    Hi,
    I have a requirement where I need to support national keyboard layout for Danish for all users on that machine. When I ran the powershell with script Set-WinUserLanguageList
    -LanguageList da-DK it only sets the Danish keyboard layout to the specific logged in user.However the for other users its same English(US) keyboard which is not expected.
    Please help me how to set the Danish keyboard for all users on the machine. Its Urgent!Thanks

    Hi Mike,
    Thanks for reply.
    But I need to configure everything using powershell script. Is it possible to use powershell script to setting group policy/ adding logon script ?
    These are pretty basic administration tasks and almost always quicker to accomplish with the GUI. Why do you want to use a PowerShell script?
    EDIT: Here's some information on the topic however:
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc781361%28v=ws.10%29.aspx
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/heyscriptingguy/archive/2011/01/06/use-powershell-and-group-policy-for-your-logon-script.aspx
    Don't retire TechNet! -
    (Don't give up yet - 13,225+ strong and growing)

  • HELP needed on Remote Management set to allow access for all users

    my mac mini snow leopard server runs in a data center and i use screen sharing to interact with it. i played with the sharing settings remotely yesterday and changed "allow access for" to all users. i was disconnected immediately and i couldn't logon again. i have no luck changing to other users. i don't want to make a special trip to the center to change it back to whatever it used to be. i can still use afp to connect but the screen sharing option is no longer available. what does "allow access for all users" mean anyway?
    thanks!

    As its name implies, allow access for all should allow any valid user account to access the server. I'm not sure why it's no longer working. It almost sounds like the ARDAgent crashed.
    Either way there's a command-line interface to the ARD preferences:
    /System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/Resources/ki ckstart
    man kickstart discusses the options, including examples of how to enable access for specific users.

  • After installing Mountain Lion, why is there Yahoo access for one user but not another?--both are administrators.

    After installing Mountain Lion, why is there Yahoo access for one user but not another?--both are administrators.

    We've had several instances where we have had to run chkdsk on arrays with over 1m files. Average completion time is approximately 72 hours. The maximum downtime window they have available is the 64 hour weekend window. File sizes and number of files were
    much smaller then than they are now.
    The idea, in theory, was to use VHDs to compartmentalize the data into smaller volumes which could be more easily managed. It would also improve performance when transferring these compartments of data as they would use sequential read/write rather than
    fragmented/random. This idea was never fleshed out in entirety, they don't split data up into little containers, but simply into big ones per project. Hence the 11m files in one container that I am currently trying to diagnose.
    Some other important facts: The VHD in question is mounted in B:/project/ as this server also allows remote workers to log in, but they are restricted to see only data in E:. Disks A-D are hidden via group policy.
    Update: icacls is failing on a large number of files within this dataset. I counted the path characters to ensure it wasn't the 255 character limit I was encountering and verified that the paths being blocked are only about 150 characters long. Once it finishes,
    I'll have to try taking ownership and then re-running it. At this point I still have no idea how long to expect. I'm running out of time as the environment will be in use again at 9AM tomorrow morning.

  • Disable JRE Auto update in Vista for all users?

    I feel like a complete idiot that I can't figure this out, but it's either so obvious I'm overlooking it, or I just plain can't figure it out, so I'm hoping someone here can help.
    We have not yet been able to figure out how to simply disabled the Auto Update option when installing JRE under Vista, so it will never check for updates, no matter what user is logged into a pc. I've just installed the newest version 1.6.0_05-b13, but get the same results.
    Basically, we are creating a "base clone image" of a Vista workstation and we need the auto update feature of the JRE to be disabled so it doesn't check for updates. When a new user logs into the pc, we want them to 'inherit' this setting from the default user profile, or we simply want a 'global' setting on the pc that stops all JAVA update checks from occuring. But even though there are multiple registry keys that 'look' like they control the auto update function, no matter how we set them the update option still shows it is enabled when you open the JAVA control panel.
    We have 2 basic problems:
    - When a standard user runs the JAVA Control Panel applet and they select the 'Update' tab, the option to "uncheck" autoupdates is "grayed out". If we make the user a local administrator, then it is not grayed out anymore and they can set the option. Problem is, we have thousands of users and none of them are local administrators, hence the problem of getting it to already be defaulted to not check for updates. How do we get the update checkbox to NOT be grayed out for a NON-administrator?
    - How do we set the 'global' (or default) option to disable the auto update checkbox for ALL users? No matter what we try, when a new user logs in, the auto update feature is still enabled after their initial profile is generated from the first time login.
    I was able to figure out if I change the "EnableJavaUpdate" value in the below registry key, it will "remove" the Update tab from the JAVA Control Panel. But does the simply remove the tab? Or does it remove the tab AND disable auto updates for ALL users on the computer?
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\Java Update\Policy
    I've sent multiple emails to Sun asking for help on what should be a simple thing to do, but have never received a reply from them.
    Keith Hemmelman

    Thank you for the reply. I apologize for not getting back here sooner.
    We actually already use a deployment.properties file located under the Default User profile on our Vista setup. It's located under the "C:\Users\Default\AppData\LocalLow\Sun\Java\Deployment" folder. This file does get copied over to a new user profile when a new person logs in. This is what we want since we have set things like the maximum cache size and temporary file location.
    The problem though is there is no setting that disables the automatic update check within this file. The best I can figure out is that for some reason under the Vista environment, the auto update setting is controlled in the registry at: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\JavaSoft\Java Update\Policy
    There is a REG_BINARY key there that appears to control this option. It is named "EnableAutoUpdateCheck". The problem is that the value of this key is "several" characters long and it is "different" from one user to the next. I tried disabling auto update under the Java Control Panel and then copied the value of this key into the same aread of the Default User hive but when a new user logs in, it ignores that setting and auto update is still enabled. I also tried using a simple "0" to disable the autoupdate or a "1" to enable it for this key, but it doesn't work either. (This is very frustrating why there isn't a simple 1 or 0 setting to turn the auto update setting on/off.)
    We had no problem getting this to work under XP. Basically we didn't have to do anything special in XP. We simply created a temporary user account and made all the settings we wanted and then copied that profile over to our Default User profile and the Java autoupdate setting under the Java Control Panel was disabled for all new users. We did the same thing under Vista, but the auto update setting was ignored and re-enabled for all new users.
    I read through the settings for the deployment.properties file located at the below link, but there is nothing there to control the auto update setting.
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/deployment/deployment-guide/properties.html
    Thus, we can't get the auto update setting to be disabled in the default user profile so it will in turn be disabled for all new users that log into the computer. This is extremely frustrating.
    The other equally frustrating problem we have run into under the Vista environment is that when you run the Java Control Panel, the option to disable the auto update check is "grayed out" and the user can't uncheck this option to disable auto update. We have found you must be an administrator before this option is no longer grayed out. Since none of our thousands of users are admins, this is also a problem for us. (This option works fine for a standard user if you are on a XP machine though. It's just Vista where things have changed.)
    I've sent repeated emails to Sun in the past asking for help, but they never replied.
    Keith

  • Win7 and Reader X - default settings for ALL users/profiles

    I have a custom browser/app that opens PDF's within the app which can sometimes cause issues. I found that if I set Reader X to not open in the browser (Edit>Preferences>Internet - uncheck "Display PDF in Browser") that this does resolve most issues. My problem...when changed this only affects the current user/profile that's logged in. Potentially there can be dozens of users on these laptops. The other setting is when opening a PDF, I get the warning about Protected Mode not being able to be used due to the current configuration. I can select "Always open with Protected Mode disabled" and I no longer get the message; but again, current user/profile only.
    Is there a way to set these settings for ALL users/profiles? Running Win7 (32bit) with Reader X.

    I do not know why you experience this; what exactly happens when a non-admin users attempts to highlight something?
    You are talking about highlighting in the same document?

  • Mounting drives on the desktop for all users

    Hi
    Is there a way of mounting drives ( like USB pens) on the desktop for all users please?
    It's a causing a lot of confusion here... you think the USB drives aren't working when you can't see them being mounted in front of you.
    I do realise you can set this in Finder/Preferences but I wondered if there were a way of just making it the default for any user that logs in ( whether locally or to the domain).
    Thanks for your assistance.

    micromike wrote:
    Thanks for your help Barney.
    Hmmmm....why would anyone disable this basic thing?
    Here's a reason. I don't use the Desktop, so why would I want the drives to pop up on my desktop.
    They appear in my Sidebar in any Finder window.
    That's why I turned it off on my system. You'd have to ask the 1000 users why they turned it off.
    However, I'm not sure I understand what you want. If you mount a usb drive on your system, and share it out over the network, it is not a Hard Drive on any network user's desktop. It is a network share.

  • Enable save for all users in rich client document defaultly for all users

    Hi,
    Is there a option to enable save for all users in a rich client document defaultly for all users across the company. As the users who are creating reports are forgetting to check the box before sending the rich client document to others. Kindly let me know if you have any suggestions on this.
    Thanks,
    Karthik

    I'd suggest that is is where your BO folder structure comes in. You can export from Rich Client to any folder that you have permissions to access - some sort of collaboration folder system would potentially be better and more secure than sending unsecured reports via email. If your IT security team found out that you were removing document security, I doubt they'd be impressed!
    You can't do the default save for all users, simple as that (it's bad practice anyway, which is probably why you can't). While it's not the answer that you want to hear, it is the correct one.

  • Getting tasks for all users in a role

    Hi,
    We need to get all users in a Role, and out of those, find out which one has the least tasks in their UWL using a WebService. Saw some example codes and here's my attempt at it. Doesn't quite work, I'm getting the Logged in users context or session doesn't exist Exception. Any help on this will be GREATLY appreciated.
    public class LeastTasksBean implements LeastTasksLocal {
         public String getUserLeastTasks( String sRole )
              try{
                   Map<String, String> users = new HashMap<String, String>();
                   Map<String, String> tasks = new HashMap<String, String>();
                   final int sessionIdleTimeout = 60;
                   String Users[] = UMFactory.getRoleFactory().getUsersOfRole( sRole, true );
                   if( Users != null ){
                        for( int i = 0; i < Users.length; i ++ ){
                             UWLContext  uwlContext      = new UWLContext();
                             IUWLService uwlService      = findService();
                             uwlContext.setAllowBackEndConnections( true );
                             IUser uwlContextUser        = UMFactory.getUserFactory().getUser( Users[0] );
                             uwlContext.setUser            ( uwlContextUser );
                             Locale loc                  = new Locale( "ES" );
                             uwlContext.setLocale          ( loc );
                             HttpServletRequest request  = getHttpRequest();
                             uwlContext.setOriginRequest   ( request );
                             IUWLSession session         = uwlService.beginSession( uwlContext, sessionIdleTimeout );
                             uwlContext.setSession         ( session );
                             IUWLItemManager itemManager = uwlService.getItemManager( uwlContext );
                             QueryResult result          = itemManager.getItems( uwlContext, null, null );
                             users.put( String.valueOf( i ), uwlContext.getUserName() );
                             tasks.put( String.valueOf( i ), String.valueOf( result.getItems().size() ) );
                             uwlService.endSession( uwlContext );
                        int userTasks = 0;
                        int leastTasks = Integer.valueOf( tasks.get( 0 ) );
                        int userKey = 0;
                        for( int i = 0; i < Users.length; i ++ ){
                             userTasks = Integer.valueOf( tasks.get( Integer.toString( i ) ) );
                             if( userTasks < leastTasks ){
                                  leastTasks = userTasks;
                                  userKey = i;
                        return users.get( Integer.toString( userKey ) );
                   else{
                        return "No users exist for this role";
              //Exception Handling
         private IUWLService findService() throws NamingException
              Properties properties = new Properties();
              properties.put( InitialContext.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "com.sapportals.portal.prt.registry.PortalRegistryFactory" ); 
              InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext( propiedades ); 
              IUWLService uwlService = ( IUWLService ) ctx.lookup( IUWLService.ALIAS_KEY );
              return uwlService;
         private HttpServletRequest getHttpRequest() throws Exception
              Properties properties = new Properties();
              properties.put( "domain", "true" );
              ApplicationWebServiceContext wsContext =
                   (ApplicationWebServiceContext) new InitialContext( propiedades ).lookup( "/wsContext/" + ApplicationWebServiceContext.APPLICATION_WSCONTEXT );
              HttpServletRequest request = wsContext.getHttpServletRequest();
              return request; 

    Hi David,
    I have a similar requirement on our project. I need to get a count of pending workitems for all user but I'm getting similar message when I try to access UWL context of any other user.
    Did you find any solution for this? Is it possible to get the workitems for all users using webservice or wendynpro?
    I would appreciate if you can provide some inputs on this.
    Thank you in advance.
    Regards,
    Seema Rane

  • Report all activations of Office 365 ProPlus for all users

    Hello:
    I know that I can open my Office 365 Settings, Software, and see how many devices I have activated Office 365 Pro-plus on.
    What I am looking for is a way for an Admin to run a Powershell script (or command) to retrieve the activations for ALL users in a tenant.
    Thanks
    Tim

    Hi Tim,
    As far as I know, this is not possible. We can use Get-msoluser command to get the license status. But we can’t get details of all users’ activated computer name list for the Office 365 tenant with a Powershell script.
    By the way, this forum focuses on questions and feedback for Microsoft Office Client. There is not so much about Office 365
    console/hosted/cloud aspects here. For your case, I would suggest you to post in the forum of Office 365 Community, where you can get more experienced responses:
    http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/default.aspx
    The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other partners who read the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us. Thank you for your understanding.
    Regards,
    Ethan Hua
    Forum Support
    Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here

  • HT5243 It says on the "Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 8" pg that this download is for all users and supercedes all earlier versions. Yet to the right is says you HAVE to have 10.6.8 as a requirement. WHICH is it?  Is it for all versions of 10.6 or not?

    It says on the "Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 8" pg that this download is for all users and supercedes all earlier versions. Yet to the right is says you HAVE to HAVE 10.6.8 as a requirement. WHICH is it?  Is it for all versions of 10.6 or not? Why isnt this made more clear?
    And question is STILL not answered.  WHICH is to be downloaded and used?
    I would like an answer.

    Thank you for the clarification!  It is really kinda circle-speaking to state on an information page to put forth info people need in that manner.  It really does add to the confusion and frustration when you need a simple,
    straight answer, such as you gave, and you dont get one.  Kind of like that . . other... software company....
    This rabbit hole still continues, though.  I'm going to ladder it out, just to see for myself:
    Have: MacBookPro / 2.4 GHz/ Intel Core i5/ running OS X 10.6.3 -
    Need: latest version of Java, so Flash update can be loaded;
                                  (want html5 to be the standard so badly, but client wants Flash)                  
      Attempted:  Tried to find Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 2 on Apple website.  No Joy.
            Found:   Update 2 is proper update for Mac OS X 10.6.3.  Could not find download on Apple website;
                           - No Joy.
      Attempted:  Tried to find Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 8. Half Joy. Confusing, no straight info.
            Found:   In order to install update for Java, must update OS X from present 10.6.3 to 10.6.8
      Attempted:   Tried to find update to OS X 10.6.3 to 10.6.8. on Apple website.
    how far does the rabbit hole go?

  • Adding printers to Terminal Server 2008 for all users

    Hi!  I'm trying to add a printer to a terminal server for all users that log in.  I've been reading around and this seems like a working solution:
    Rundll32 printui.dll,PrintUIEntry /ga /c\\localcomputername /n\\servername\printername
    So I ran this with the proper parameters.  Nothing shows up in Devices and Printers with the name I specified.  I rebooted the server, still nothing.  I re-run the command above and it tells me there's already a printer defined with that name. 
    I look at Devices and Printers and the name I specified still isn't there.  Why doesn't the above command work like it's supposed to?
    Thanks!

    Thanks, yes, that was the first command I tried (without the /c).  All subsequent attempts tell me the printer already exists yet it definitely does not show up under Devices and Printers.  I ran the above logged in as Administrator with an elevated
    command prompt.  The printer can't be seen from this login or a 'normal' user login.

Maybe you are looking for