Why is query so slow?

Hi all,
I am trying to get a count of all files that are inside a regular folder (not universe folder). My query is below, but it is SOOO slow
IInfoObjects rFiles = infoStore.query ("SELECT SI_NAME FROM CI_INFOOBJECTS WHERE SI_KIND IN ('FullClient', 'Webi') AND SI_ANCESTOR=" + regFolder.getID() );
I need more than just FullClient and Webi, but if I leave the SI_KIND out, it is even slower and will timeout. Also, I do not think it is the SI_ANCESTOR because running the query without SI_ANCESTOR is still really slow. Is there a better way of doing this? Because I need to get a count of all files in sub folders and add it to those in the root and sub folders of sub folders. The SI_ANCESTOR would be great if this was not as slow

Hi Ted,
I have a requirement to get the biar backup through command prompt. I am using the biar engine to query and export the biar.
Currently I am able to query and export only for one folder and the reports.
However If there are mutiple folders under one hieararchy with sub folders , how can we write a nested query to pull all the folders , reports in it.
I want to call this query in the biar export file.
Would you please share your thoughts.
Regards,
Prasant

Similar Messages

Why is the query so slow?

Hi,
I've got a query running fast (3 sec.)
If I try to execute it on test enviroment, it takes about 2 minutes (!)
I see in both enviroments the explain plan is the same and so are the indexes used. I've also tried to rebuild the indexes and the tables that looked quite fragmented in test, but the result is always the same. Could it be that our test enviroment is slower and with lower performances? What else could I check? (Oracle Vers. is 8.1.7)
Thanks!

812809 wrote:
steps to follow:
1.whether the candidate columns has index or notSometimes and index can cause a query to slow down rather than speed up, especially if a person has created too many indexes on a table and the optimiser can't figure out the best one to use.
2.go for explain plan and look the query not to fall under the category of Full Table ScanFull table scans are not always a bad thing. Sometimes they are faster than using the index. It depends.

Sql query runing slow with lower cost

Hello
I am working on Oracle 11g and AIX.I have one sql query which is ruing slow as reported by user.
When i am commenting few line of code it is runing fast.
I noticed that the execution plan cost of first query is less and second ...as cost of sccond qurey is more.But users are say it is runing fast.
How it can possiable ?
Any idea why second query is runing fast after commenting few columns in select and group by clause.
Query 1
SELECT PH.CTRL_NBR, PD.SEQ_NBR,PH.CNTRY,PH.SHIP_DATE, PHI.WAVE_NBR, PD.ID, PD.QTY,
IM.PACK_QTY,
IM.UNIT_VOL,
IM.PACK_QTY,
MAX(CD.PACK_QTY) AS CASE_QTY,
IM.UNIT_WT
FROM HDR PH,
HDR_INTRNL PHI,
DTL PD,
HDR CH,
CASEDTL CD,
IMASTER IM
WHERE PH.CTRL_NBR = PHI.CTRL_NBR
AND PD.CTRL_NBR = PH.CTRL_NBR
AND PD.QTY > 0
AND SUBSTR(CD.ID, 1, 9) = SUBSTR(PD.ID, 1, 9)
AND CD.CASENBR = CH.CASENBR
AND CH.STAT_CODE BETWEEN '10' AND '90'
AND IM.ID = PD.ID
AND PHI.WAVE_NBR='EL57893'
GROUP BY PH.CTRL_NBR, PD.SEQ_NBR, PH.CNTRY, PH.SHIP_DATE, PHI.WAVE_NBR, PD.ID, PD.QTY,
IM.PACK_QTY,
IM.UNITVOL,
IM.UNITWT,
IM.PACK_QTY
Query 2 .
SELECT PH.CTRL_NBR,
PD.SEQ_NBR,
PH.CNTRY,
PH.SHIP_DATE,
PHI.WAVE_NBR,
PD.ID,
PD.QTY,
-- IM.PACK_QTY,
-- IM.UNIT_VOL,
-- IM.PACK_QTY,
MAX(CD.PACK_QTY) AS CASE_QTY,
-- IM.UNIT_WT
FROM HDR PH,
HDR_INTRNL PHI,
DTL PD,
HDR CH,
CASEDTL CD,
IMASTER IM
WHERE PH.CTRL_NBR = PHI.CTRL_NBR
AND PD.CTRL_NBR = PH.CTRL_NBR
AND PD.QTY > 0
AND SUBSTR(CD.ID, 1, 9) = SUBSTR(PD.ID, 1, 9)
AND CD.CASENBR = CH.CASENBR
AND CH.STAT_CODE BETWEEN '10' AND '90'
AND IM.ID = PD.ID
AND PHI.WAVE_NBR='EL57893'
GROUP BY PH.CTRL_NBR, PD.SEQ_NBR, PH.CNTRY, PH.SHIP_DATE, PHI.WAVE_NBR, PD.ID, PD.QTY,
--IM.PACK_QTY,
--IM.UNITVOL,
--IM.UNITWT,
--IM.PACK_QTY
Edited by: oradba11 on Sep 6, 2012 2:11 PM
Edited by: oradba11 on Sep 6, 2012 2:12 PM

oradba11 wrote:
Hello
I am working on Oracle 11g and AIX.I have one sql query which is ruing slow as reported by user.
When i am commenting few line of code it is runing fast.
I noticed that the execution plan cost of first query is less and second ...as cost of sccond qurey is more.But users are say it is runing fast.
How it can possiable ? <snip>
This doesn't address your question, but let me suggest that for your own sanity you start brining some formatting to your sql. And for the sanity of those on this forum of whom you expect assistance, you preserve that formatting through the use of the code tags (see the FAQ for details).
I've done the first one for you, as an example of what I mean
SELECT
     PH.CTRL_NBR
,     PD.SEQ_NBR
,     PH.CNTRY
,     PH.SHIP_DATE
,     PHI.WAVE_NBR
,     PD.ID
,     PD.QTY
,     IM.PACK_QTY
,     IM.UNIT_VOL
,     IM.PACK_QTY
,     MAX(CD.PACK_QTY) AS CASE_QTY
,     IM.UNIT_WT
FROM
     HDR PH
,     HDR_INTRNL PHI
,     DTL PD
,     HDR CH
,     CASEDTL CD
,     IMASTER IM
WHERE
     PH.CTRL_NBR = PHI.CTRL_NBR
   AND PD.CTRL_NBR = PH.CTRL_NBR
   AND PD.QTY > 0
   AND SUBSTR(CD.ID, 1, 9) = SUBSTR(PD.ID, 1, 9)
   AND CD.CASENBR = CH.CASENBR
   AND CH.STAT_CODE BETWEEN '10' AND '90'
   AND IM.ID = PD.ID
   AND PHI.WAVE_NBR='EL57893'
GROUP BY
     PH.CTRL_NBR
,     PD.SEQ_NBR
,     PH.CNTRY
,     PH.SHIP_DATE
,      PHI.WAVE_NBR
,      PD.ID
,      PD.QTY
,      IM.PACK_QTY
,     IM.UNITVOL
,     IM.UNITWT
,     IM.PACK_QTY

Query sometimes slow

Have anybody idea why this query sometimes running very slow?
But only sometimes!
Thanks for any ideas on this.
SQL> SELECT a, b
2    FROM X_TAB
3 WHERE A_KL = '2ABRY'
4   AND A_JL = '2ABRY'
5   AND YEAR = 2006
6   AND ID_DB = 906858
7 ORDER BY a;
Execution Plan
   0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=ALL_ROWS (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=41)
   1    0   TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'X_TAB' (TABLE) (Cost=1 Card=1 Bytes=41)
   2    1     INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'ACG_UK3' (INDEX (UNIQUE)) (Cost=1 Card=3)
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
         13 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
       3555 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        295 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          5 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
         58 rows processedDefinition of index:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX acg_uk3 ON x_tab
    ID_DB                    ASC,
    A_KL                     ASC,
    YEAR                     ASC,
    A                        ASC
PCTFREE     10
INITRANS    2
MAXTRANS    255
TABLESPACE xx000_w
STORAGE   (
    INITIAL     131072
    NEXT        131072
    PCTINCREASE 0
    MINEXTENTS 1
    MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
)Should we reconfigure this index or someone see problem somewhere else?

Have anybody idea why this query sometimes running
very slow?
But only sometimes!It seems to me there is some process which cause to degrade yours query execution ,for that a wait event occurs because something is being processed where other processes waiting for its completion are dependent on the result of the event causing the wait. When one process waits for another to complete a wait event is recorded in database statistics.
For detail info
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14211/instance_tune.htm#i18202Khurram

Query performance slow

Hi Experts,
Please clarify my doubts.
1. How can we know the particular query performance slow in all?
2. How can we define a cell in BEx?
3. Info cube is info provider, Info Object is not Info Provider why?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
1. How can we know the particular query performance slow in all?
   When you run the query it's take more time we know that query is taken more if where that query is taking more time you can collect the statics.
   like Selct your cube and set BI statics check box after that it will give the all statics data regarding your query.
DB time (Data based time),Frent end Time (Query), Agrreation time like etc. based on that we go for the perfomance aggreations, compresion, indexes etc.
2. How can we define a cell in BEx?
   In Your Bex query your using two structures it's enabled. If you want create the different formulate by row wise you go for this.
3. Info cube is info provider, Info Object is not Info Provider why?
    Info object also info provider,
    when your info object also you can convert into info provider using " Convert as data target".
Thanks and Regards,
Venkat.
Edited by: venkatewara reddy on Jul 27, 2011 12:05 PM

Query runs slower when using variables & faster when using hard coded value

Hi,
My query runs slower when i use variables but it runs faster when i use hard coded values. Why it is behaving like this ?
My query is in cursor definition in a procedure. Procedure runs faster when using hard coded valus and slower when using variables.
Can anybody help me out there?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Thanks for ur reply.
here is my code with Variables:
Procedure populateCountryTrafficDetails(pWeekStartDate IN Date , pCountry IN d_geography.country_code%TYPE) is
startdate date;
AR_OrgId number(10);
Cursor cTraffic is
Select
          l.actual_date, nvl(o.city||o.zipcode,'Undefined') Site,
          g.country_code,d.customer_name, d.customer_number,t.contrno bcn,
          nvl(r.dest_level3,'Undefined'),
          Decode(p.Product_code,'820','821','821','821','801') Product_Code ,
          Decode(p.Product_code,'820','Colt Voice Connect','821','Colt Voice Connect','Colt Voice Line') DProduct,
          sum(f.duration),
          sum(f.debamount_eur)
          from d_calendar_date l,
          d_geography g,
          d_customer d, d_contract t, d_subscriber s,
          d_retail_dest r, d_product p,
          CPS_ORDER_DETAILS o,
          f_retail_revenue f
          where
          l.date_key = f.call_date_key and
          g.geography_key = f.geography_key and
          r.dest_key = f.dest_key and
          p.product_key = f.product_key and
          --c.customer_key = f.customer_key and
          d.customer_key = f.customer_key and
          t.contract_key = f.contract_key and
          s.SUBSCRIBER_KEY = f.SUBSCRIBER_KEY and
          o.org_id(+) = AR_OrgId and
          g.country_code = pCountry and
          l.actual_date >= startdate and
          l.actual_date <= (startdate + 90) and
          o.cli(+) = s.area_subno and
          p.product_code in ('800','801','802','804','820','821')
          group by
          l.actual_date,
          o.city||o.zipcode, g.country_code,d.customer_name, d.customer_number,t.contrno,r.dest_level3, p.product_code;
Type CountryTabType is Table of country_traffic_details.Country%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type CallDateTabType is Table of country_traffic_details.CALL_DATE%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type CustomerNameTabType is Table of Country_traffic_details.Customer_name%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type CustomerNumberTabType is Table of Country_traffic_details.Customer_number%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type BcnTabType is Table of Country_traffic_details.Bcn%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type DestinationTypeTabType is Table of Country_traffic_details.DESTINATION_TYPE%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type ProductCodeTabType is Table of Country_traffic_details.Product_Code%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type ProductTabType is Table of Country_traffic_details.Product%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type DurationTabType is Table of Country_traffic_details.Duration%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type DebamounteurTabType is Table of Country_traffic_details.DEBAMOUNTEUR%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
Type SiteTabType is Table of Country_traffic_details.Site%Type index by BINARY_INTEGER;
CountryArr CountryTabType;
CallDateArr CallDateTabType;
Customer_NameArr CustomerNameTabType;
CustomerNumberArr CustomerNumberTabType;
BCNArr BCNTabType;
DESTINATION_TYPEArr DESTINATIONTYPETabType;
PRODUCT_CODEArr PRODUCTCODETabType;
PRODUCTArr PRODUCTTabType;
DurationArr DurationTabType;
DebamounteurArr DebamounteurTabType;
SiteArr SiteTabType;
Begin
     startdate := (trunc(pWeekStartDate) + 6) - 90;
     Exe_Pos := 1;
     Execute Immediate 'Truncate table country_traffic_details';
     dropIndexes('country_traffic_details');
     Exe_Pos := 2;
     /* Set org ID's as per AR */
     case (pCountry)
     when 'FR' then AR_OrgId := 81;
     when 'AT' then AR_OrgId := 125;
     when 'CH' then AR_OrgId := 126;
     when 'DE' then AR_OrgId := 127;
     when 'ES' then AR_OrgId := 123;
     when 'IT' then AR_OrgId := 122;
     when 'PT' then AR_OrgId := 124;
     when 'BE' then AR_OrgId := 132;
     when 'IE' then AR_OrgId := 128;
     when 'DK' then AR_OrgId := 133;
     when 'NL' then AR_OrgId := 129;
     when 'SE' then AR_OrgId := 130;
     when 'UK' then AR_OrgId := 131;
     else raise_application_error (-20003, 'No such Country Code Exists.');
     end case;
     Exe_Pos := 3;
dbms_output.put_line('3: '||to_char(sysdate, 'HH24:MI:SS'));
     populateOrderDetails(AR_OrgId);
dbms_output.put_line('4: '||to_char(sysdate, 'HH24:MI:SS'));
     Exe_Pos := 4;
     Open cTraffic;
     Loop
     Exe_Pos := 5;
     CallDateArr.delete;
FETCH cTraffic BULK COLLECT
          INTO CallDateArr, SiteArr, CountryArr, Customer_NameArr,CustomerNumberArr,
          BCNArr,DESTINATION_TYPEArr,PRODUCT_CODEArr, PRODUCTArr, DurationArr, DebamounteurArr LIMIT arraySize;
          EXIT WHEN CallDateArr.first IS NULL;
               Exe_pos := 6;
                    FORALL i IN 1..callDateArr.last
                    insert into country_traffic_details
                    values(CallDateArr(i), CountryArr(i), Customer_NameArr(i),CustomerNumberArr(i),
                    BCNArr(i),DESTINATION_TYPEArr(i),PRODUCT_CODEArr(i), PRODUCTArr(i), DurationArr(i),
                    DebamounteurArr(i), SiteArr(i));
                    Exe_pos := 7;
dbms_output.put_line('7: '||to_char(sysdate, 'HH24:MI:SS'));
     EXIT WHEN ctraffic%NOTFOUND;
END LOOP;
     commit;
Exe_Pos := 8;
          commit;
dbms_output.put_line('8: '||to_char(sysdate, 'HH24:MI:SS'));
          lSql := 'CREATE INDEX COUNTRY_TRAFFIC_DETAILS_CUSTNO ON country_traffic_details (CUSTOMER_NUMBER)';
          execDDl(lSql);
          lSql := 'CREATE INDEX COUNTRY_TRAFFIC_DETAILS_BCN ON country_traffic_details (BCN)';
          execDDl(lSql);
          lSql := 'CREATE INDEX COUNTRY_TRAFFIC_DETAILS_PRODCD ON country_traffic_details (PRODUCT_CODE)';
          execDDl(lSql);
          lSql := 'CREATE INDEX COUNTRY_TRAFFIC_DETAILS_SITE ON country_traffic_details (SITE)';
          execDDl(lSql);
          lSql := 'CREATE INDEX COUNTRY_TRAFFIC_DETAILS_DESTYP ON country_traffic_details (DESTINATION_TYPE)';
          execDDl(lSql);
          Exe_Pos:= 9;
dbms_output.put_line('9: '||to_char(sysdate, 'HH24:MI:SS'));
Exception
     When Others then
     raise_application_error(-20003, 'Error in populateCountryTrafficDetails at Position: '||Exe_Pos||' The Error is '||SQLERRM);
End populateCountryTrafficDetails;
In the above procedure if i substitute the values with hard coded values i.e. AR_orgid = 123 & pcountry = 'Austria' then it runs faster.
Please let me know why it is so ?
Thanks in advance.

Why this query does not show the result?

Why the query with the schema prefixed does not show the result and the query without schema display the correct results?
SQL> select data_object_id,object_type from dba_objects where object_name='HR'.'JOBS';
select data_object_id,object_type from dba_objects where object_name='HR'.'JOBS'
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
SQL> select data_object_id,object_type from dba_objects where object_name='HR.JOBS';
no rows selected
SQL> select data_object_id, OWNER, object_type from dba_objects where object_name='JOBS';
DATA_OBJECT_ID     OWNER                          OBJECT_TYPE
69662              HR                                 TABLE
                   OE                                 SYNONYM
SQL> SELECT USER FROM DUAL;
USER
SYS

Hi,
the column object_name refers to a object_name which is 'JOBS', the column owner refers to the owner 'HR', the value isn't stored together, so you have to select the two columns. It is the same behaviour as every other table/view. Have a look at the values in the view DBA_OBJECTS.
Herald ten Dam
Superconsult.nl

Why does Photoshop keep slowing down?

I've been using Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 for two years now, and for some reason it seems to have the problem of slowing down after using it for a while, so if I'm working on a project I have to keep closing it and reopening it to get it fast again. It's weird because it doesn't seem to matter how much stuff is on the canvas, it's just how much I've drawn and hit undo and erased or did anything, After like 5 minutes of straight work it just gets too slow for me to work in, like when I switch tools or change the color it takes a couple seconds to respond. So literally every couple minutes I have to restart Photoshop and open the same file.
What's really odd is that sometimes Photoshop will work perfectly fine and stay lightning fast for hours. Like, for the last couple of months it's been 100% fine, but since a few days ago it started to have this "slowing down" issue again. Every couple months it seems to decide to be perfectly fine or just really annoying. I didn't change anything in my computer.
It can't be my computers specs or my settings in Photoshop, but I will tell you all of that anyway.
OS - Windows 7 64-bit
CPU - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz
RAM - 12GB DDR3 @ 1333MHz

There is no malware scanner running, in fact I have tried closing out all other applications and unnecessary processes to help improve performance. No luck.
Also, my post actually wasn't quite finished, but my internet shut off on me last night and I guess that just automatically posted whatever I had done before then. What's even better is that the forums won't allow me to edit it. What great features!
Anyway, here's the FULL spec sheet of my computer...
OS - Windows 7 64-bit
CPU - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz
RAM - 12GB DDR3 @ 1333MHz
GPU - NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 1GB
Storage - 1x 128GB SSD (OS installed on), 1x 750GB HDD, 1x 160GB HDD
I have the 64-bit version of Photoshop CS5.1 Extended, installed on the SSD. Here's the settings I have in the preferences:
Memory Usage - 100%
Scratch Disks - All 3, SSD 1st, 750GB HDD 2nd, 160GB HDD 3rd
History States - 100
Cache Levels - 8
Cache Tile Size - 1028K
I have fiddled with these settings and restarted Photoshop countless times. In the end it's the same exact result: Photoshop slows down after a few minutes of work and I have to restart it. I have about 50GB free on the SSD, 150GB free on the 750GB, and about 140GB free on the 160GB.
I don't understand why it gets so slow even when my RAM usage only makes it up to about 45%. Why doesn't it just utilize ALL of the memory like I told it to?
I've tried setting cache to 1, 2, and 4, same result. Cache tile size to all the different settings, same result. History states to an extremely low level like 10, same result. I just don't understand why Photoshop is doing this, especially because it decides to speed up on its own every couple of months...

Why is Start up slow on MacBook Pro after Lion installation?

I've noticed that it takes a while for my MacBook to turn on and start-up since I installed Lion. Any ideas why or how to correct? Thanks!!

Your machine is likely too dated to run 10.8 adequately.
Apple makes it easy, doesn't mean it's right match for your hardware.
Why is my computer slow?
How to revert your Mac to Snow Leopard
How to erase and install Snow Leopard 10.6

Why youtube streaming is slow with ipad mini?

Why youtube streaming is slow with ipad mini?

How to Fix a Slow iPad
http://ipad.about.com/od/iPad_Troubleshooting/ss/How-To-Fix-A-Slow-iPad.htm
iPad running slow? How to speed up a slow iPad
http://appletoolbox.com/2012/07/ipad-running-slow-how-to-speed-up-a-slow-ipad/
 Cheers, Tom

Query very slow!

I have Oracle 9i and SUN OS 5.8
I have a Java application that have a query to the Customer table. This table has 2.000.000 of records and I have to show its in pages (20 record each page)
The user query for example the Customer that the Last Name begin with O. Then the application shows the first 20 records with this condition and order by Name.
Then I have to create 2 querys
1)
SELECT id_customer,Name
FROM Customers
WHERE Name like 'O%'
ORDER BY id_customer
But when I proved this query in TOAD it take long to do it (the time consuming was 15 minutes)
I have the index in the NAME field!!
Besides, if the user want to go to the second page the query is executed again. (The java programmers said me that)
What is your recommendation to optimize it????? I need to obtain the information in
few seconds.
2)
SELECT count(*) FROM Customers WHERE NAME like 'O%'
I have to do this query because I need to known How many pages (20 records) I need to show.
Example with 5000 records I have to have 250 pages.
But when I proved this query in TOAD it take long to do it (the time consuming was 30 seconds)
What is your recommendation to optimize it????? I need to obtain the information in
few seconds.
Thanks in advance!

This appears to be a dulpicate of a post in the Query very slow! forum.
Claudio, since the same folks tend to read both forums, it is generally preferred that you post questions in only one forum. That way, multiple people don't spend time writing generally equivalent replies.
Justin
Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC

Update query is slow with merge replication

Hello friend,
I have a database with enabling merge replication.
Then the problem is update query is taking more time.
But when I disable the merge triggers then it'll update quickly.
I really appreciate your
quick response.
Thanks.

Hi Manjula,
According to your description, the update query is slow after configuring merge replication. There are some proposals for you troubleshooting this issue as follows.
1. Perform regular index maintenance, update statistics, re-index, on the following Replication system tables.
    •MSmerge_contents
    •MSmerge_genhistory
    •MSmerge_tombstone
    •MSmerge_current_partition_mappings
    •MSmerge_past_partition_mappings
2. Make sure that your tables involved in the query have suitable indexes. Also do the re-indexing and update the statistics for these tables. Additionally, you can use
Database Engine Tuning Advisor to tune databases for better query performance.
Here are some related articles for your reference.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chrissk/archive/2010/02/01/sql-server-merge-replication-best-practices.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177500(v=sql.105).aspx
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang

Why this Query is taking much longer time than expected?

Hi,
I need experts support on the below mentioned issue:
Why this Query is taking much longer time than expected? Sometimes I am getting connection timeout error. Is there any better way to achieve result in shortest time. Below, please find the DDL & DML:
DDL
BHDCollections
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BHDCollections](
[BHDCollectionid] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[GroupMemberid] [int] NOT NULL,
[BHDDate] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[BHDShift] [varchar](10) NULL,
[SlipValue] [decimal](18, 3) NOT NULL,
[ProcessedValue] [decimal](18, 3) NOT NULL,
[BHDRemarks] [varchar](500) NULL,
[Createdby] [varchar](50) NULL,
[Createdon] [datetime] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_BHDCollections] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[BHDCollectionid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
BHDCollectionsDet
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BHDCollectionsDet](
[CollectionDetailid] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[BHDCollectionid] [bigint] NOT NULL,
[Currencyid] [int] NOT NULL,
[Denomination] [decimal](18, 3) NOT NULL,
[Quantity] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_BHDCollectionsDet] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[CollectionDetailid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
Banks
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Banks](
[Bankid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[Bankname] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
[Bankabbr] [varchar](50) NULL,
[BankContact] [varchar](50) NULL,
[BankTel] [varchar](25) NULL,
[BankFax] [varchar](25) NULL,
[BankEmail] [varchar](50) NULL,
[BankActive] [bit] NULL,
[Createdby] [varchar](50) NULL,
[Createdon] [datetime] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Banks] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[Bankid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
Groupmembers
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers](
[GroupMemberid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[Groupid] [int] NOT NULL,
[BAID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Createdby] [varchar](50) NULL,
[Createdon] [datetime] NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_GroupMembers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[GroupMemberid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_BankAccounts] FOREIGN KEY([BAID])
REFERENCES [dbo].[BankAccounts] ([BAID])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_BankAccounts]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_Groups] FOREIGN KEY([Groupid])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Groups] ([Groupid])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_Groups]
BankAccounts
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts](
[BAID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[CustomerID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Locationid] [varchar](25) NOT NULL,
[Bankid] [int] NOT NULL,
[BankAccountNo] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_BankAccounts] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[BAID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Banks] FOREIGN KEY([Bankid])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Banks] ([Bankid])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Banks]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Locations1] FOREIGN KEY([Locationid])
REFERENCES [dbo].[Locations] ([Locationid])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Locations1]
Currency
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Currency](
[Currencyid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[CurrencyISOCode] [varchar](20) NOT NULL,
[CurrencyCountry] [varchar](50) NULL,
[Currency] [varchar](50) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Currency] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[Currencyid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
CurrencyDetails
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[CurrencyDetails](
[CurDenid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[Currencyid] [int] NOT NULL,
[Denomination] [decimal](15, 3) NOT NULL,
[DenominationType] [varchar](25) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_CurrencyDetails] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
[CurDenid] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
QUERY
WITH TEMP_TABLE AS
SELECT     0 AS COINS, BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity AS BN, BHDCollections.BHDDate AS CollectionDate, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid,
                      (BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid) AS DSLIPS, Banks.Bankname
FROM         BHDCollections INNER JOIN
                      BHDCollectionsDet ON BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid = BHDCollectionsDet.BHDCollectionid INNER JOIN
                      GroupMembers ON BHDCollections.GroupMemberid = GroupMembers.GroupMemberid INNER JOIN
                      BankAccounts ON GroupMembers.BAID = BankAccounts.BAID INNER JOIN
                      Currency ON BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid = Currency.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                      CurrencyDetails ON Currency.Currencyid = CurrencyDetails.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                      Banks ON BankAccounts.Bankid = Banks.Bankid
GROUP BY BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity, BHDCollections.BHDDate, BankAccounts.Bankid, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid, CurrencyDetails.DenominationType,
                      CurrencyDetails.Denomination, BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination, Banks.Bankname,BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid
HAVING      (BHDCollections.BHDDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND (BankAccounts.Bankid = @Bankid) AND (CurrencyDetails.DenominationType = 'Currency') AND
                      (CurrencyDetails.Denomination = BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination)
UNION ALL
SELECT     BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity AS COINS, 0 AS BN, BHDCollections.BHDDate AS CollectionDate, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid,
                      (BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid) AS DSLIPS, Banks.Bankname
FROM         BHDCollections INNER JOIN
                      BHDCollectionsDet ON BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid = BHDCollectionsDet.BHDCollectionid INNER JOIN
                      GroupMembers ON BHDCollections.GroupMemberid = GroupMembers.GroupMemberid INNER JOIN
                      BankAccounts ON GroupMembers.BAID = BankAccounts.BAID INNER JOIN
                      Currency ON BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid = Currency.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                      CurrencyDetails ON Currency.Currencyid = CurrencyDetails.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                      Banks ON BankAccounts.Bankid = Banks.Bankid
GROUP BY BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity, BHDCollections.BHDDate, BankAccounts.Bankid, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid, CurrencyDetails.DenominationType,
                      CurrencyDetails.Denomination, BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination, Banks.Bankname,BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid
HAVING      (BHDCollections.BHDDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND (BankAccounts.Bankid = @Bankid) AND (CurrencyDetails.DenominationType = 'COIN') AND
                      (CurrencyDetails.Denomination = BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination)),
TEMP_TABLE2 AS
SELECT CollectionDate,Bankname,DSLIPS AS DSLIPS,SUM(BN) AS BN,SUM(COINS)AS COINS FROM TEMP_TABLE Group By CollectionDate,DSLIPS,Bankname
SELECT CollectionDate,Bankname,count(DSLIPS) AS DSLIPS,sum(BN) AS BN,sum(COINS) AS coins FROM TEMP_TABLE2 Group By CollectionDate,Bankname
HAVING COUNT(DSLIPS)<>0;

Without seeing an execution plan of the query it is hard to suggest something useful. Try insert the result of UNION ALL to the temporary table and then perform an aggregation on that table, not a CTE.
Just
SELECT CollectionDate,Bankname,DSLIPS AS DSLIPS,SUM(BN) AS BN,SUM(COINS)AS COINS FROM
#tmp Group By CollectionDate,DSLIPS,Bankname
HAVING COUNT(DSLIPS)<>0;
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

Query performance slow in one instance in RAC

Hi
We have 3 node RAC. When we test onw query it slow by 40% in one instance and always physical reads are hapenning in that instance.
Below are the details. All the parameters are same. Users compains some times the query is slow.
Thanks in Advance.
From Instance 1 - 9 Sec
=============================================================
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          1 db block gets
      67209 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
      23465 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      10356 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         28 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
         13 rows processed
From Instance 2 - 13 Sec
=============================================================
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          1 db block gets
      67215 consistent gets
      67193 physical reads    <<------------------------ Only in one instance
          0 redo size
      23465 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      10356 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         28 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
         13 rows processed
From Instance 3 - 9 Sec
=============================================================
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          1 db block gets
      67209 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
      23465 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      10356 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         28 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
         13 rows processed

You can also check global cache statistics. Run this before and after your query :
select name, value from v$mystat s, v$statname n where s.statistic#=n.statistic# and name like '%blocks received';

Why is verizon so slow

please someone tell me why verizon is so slow on there updates? for the first time they were 1st to deliver the 4.3 to s4's but not the s3's

Well it deals with a Step process If the Manufacture Likes it, then it's sent to Verizon it has to get there Seal of approval to move on to us the customer but if they slap a stop on the Update and it's happen many times before it has to go to the Manufacture they have to retool it Make sure it's functional then send it back to Verizon if they give the approval then as I mention it comes to our Phones to were can Download it..
Hope this Helps And Welcome to the Verizon Forums.. b33

Why is query so slow?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for