Why is the exported file size so small?

Hello!
I just spent the last few days watching about three hours of Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 tutorials and almost all five hours of the Adobe Encore CS3 tutorials on Lynda.com with the awesome 30-day trial that I received for purchasing these two programs. I pretty much got to the end of authoring my first DVD with Encore, but the file size is so small that it doesn't even take up the full size of a single-layer DVD and I was expecting to be using double-layer DVDs.
Here's why I didn't post this in the Encore discussion: My two file sizes are 10GB and 8GB. I have them both as single timelines in Premiere Pro and exported them each to Encore. But why does the file size decrease to just over 1GB for each of the files in the Export to Encore option in Premiere Pro CS3?
I begin a brand new project in Premiere Pro, import the 10GB .avi, and then do the Export to Encore with "DVD Double Layer", "Author with Menus", "Entire Sequence", "NTSC High Quality" with the quality level switched from 4 to 5, Video Codec = "MainConcept MPEG Video", 720x480, 29.97 drop frame, Lower, Standard 4:3, VBR, 2 Pass, the default bitrate settings of Minimum Bit Rate = 1.5, Target Bit Rate = 4, Maximum Bit Rate = 7, and then whatever GOP Settings are set to M Frames = 3 and N Frames = 15. Without any video editing at all, it estimates the file size at 1.7GB.
If my goal is to get the file sizes closer to 4GB and 3.5GB, can I fiddle with any of these settings without screwing up the ability for all DVD players to read my disc? I thought it would probably be ideal to have them closer to 7GB and 6GB, and then let Encore downgrade the quality to fit all of the content on the DVD with very little room to spare. But why is there no default to keep the video resolution at the absolute best possible?
Should I be exporting to a Movie instead of exporting to Encore?
Thanks!
Matt

Patrick,
After I installed and registered my software, I received this email twice for both Premiere Pro and Encore, and I would imagine that it would only make sense to receive this same type of bonus for Production Premium:
"Thanks for registering - claim your benefit today.
Adobe Systems Incorporated [[email protected]]
Thank you for purchasing and registering your copy of Adobe Premiere Pro CS3. You now have a wealth of creative tools at your disposal. While taking advantage of online and printed resources we also encourage you to select a complimentary benefit. At Adobe we want you to get the most out of your software it's our commitment to you.
Check out Adobe Bridge Home*, a feature of Adobe Bridge CS3.
Get access to product tips, training videos, product news, and other creative resources all in one place. Simply click the Adobe Bridge icon within any application to get started.
You got it, now get more.
Hypatia Sans Font:
Developed for customers who register their Adobe Creative Suite® 3 product, these unique and stylish fonts were inspired by the 1920s and '30s. Receive Adobe's new type family (a US$169 value) for free.
Lynda.com Training:
Take advantage of a free 30-day Online Training Library® subscription, including in-depth Adobe training in easy-to-use video format.
Classroom in a Book® Series:
Deepen your skills with this series of self-paced training offering step-by-step explanations, time-saving techniques and insider tips. Receive up to a 40% discount on Adobe Press' Classroom in a Book series."
Thanks for the tip, Steven! I will try that now.
- Matt

Similar Messages

  • Why is the Log Area size much smaller than the log volume

    I have been following up on an Early Watch report that has been generated for our production SCM 5.0 system running liveCache 7.6.02 Build 14.  The alert says "The LOG volumes size in your system is too small. Recommendation: Configure LOG Volumes to at least 2 GB".  There are two interesting things about this.
    1) I have spent the last couple of days reading all the OSS Notes, and MaxDB documentation I could find, and this does not seem to be documented as a recommendation anywhere.  Does this seem like a realistic recommendation without taking into account the level of change actifity?
    2)  There is a single log volume allocated with size 2,097,160 KB.  In production LC10 and DBMGUI report this to be correct size under volume details, but only list the total log area size as 1,706,328 (81% of the volume size).  We have a non-production environment with exactly the same size log volume, but it reports that the log area size is 2,032,008 KB (97% of the volume).  What leads to these different amounts of wasted space, and is there any way of getting the database to start using it?
    Thanks,
    Mark

    Hi Natalia,
    I did read 869267, several times.  It does not answer my questions which is why I posted here.
    DBMGUI version = 7.6.00.25
    DBMCLI commands for PL1 (Production)
    > xinstinfo PL1
    IndepData           : /sapdb/data
    IndepPrograms       : /sapdb/programs
    InstallationPath    : /sapdb/PL1/db
    Kernelversion       : KERNEL    7.6.02   BUILD 014-123-152-175
    Rundirectory        : /sapdb/data/wrk/PL1
    > dbmcli -d PL1 -u control,control
    dbmcli on PL1>db_state
    OK
    State
    ONLINE
    dbmcli on PL1>info log
    OK
    END    
    Name                            | Value
    Log Mirrored                    = NO
    Log Writing                     = ON
    Log Automatic Overwrite         = OFF
    Max. Size (KB)                  = 1706328
    Backup Segment Size (KB)        = 699048
    Used Size (KB)                  = 104640
    Used Size (%)                   = 6
    Not Saved (KB)                  = 104640
    Not Saved (%)                   = 6
    Log Since Last Data Backup (KB) = 0
    Savepoints                      = 5210
    Checkpoints                     = 0
    Physical Reads                  = 2469115
    Physical Writes                 = 15655616
    Queue Size (KB)                 = 48000
    Queue Overflows                 = 646
    Group Commits                   = 98205
    Waits for Logwriter             = 10957511
    Max. Waits                      = 10
    Average Waits                   = 0
    OMS Log Used Pages              = 0
    OMS Min. Free Pages             = 0
    dbmcli on PL1>param_getvolsall
    OK
    LOG_MIRRORED                     NO
    MAXLOGVOLUMES                    2
    MAXDATAVOLUMES                   14
    LOG_VOLUME_NAME_001              262145     F  /sapdb/PL1/saplog/DISKL001
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0001            524289     F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0001
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0002            524289     F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0002
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0003            524289     F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0003
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0004            524289     F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0004
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0005            524289     F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0005
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0006            524289     F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0006
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0007            524289     F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0007
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0008            524289     F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0008
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0009            1048577    F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0009
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0010            1048577    F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0010
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0011            1048577    F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0011
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0012            1048577    F  /sapdb/PL1/sapdata/DISKD0012
    dbmcli on PL1>param_directget MAXCPU
    OK
    MAXCPU  12
    dbmcli on PL1>param_directget MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT
    OK
    MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT     0
    dbmcli on PL1>param_directget LOG_IO_QUEUE
    OK
    LOG_IO_QUEUE    6000
    > xinstinfo SL1
    IndepData           : /sapdb/data
    IndepPrograms       : /sapdb/programs
    InstallationPath    : /sapdb/SL1/db
    Kernelversion       : KERNEL    7.6.02   BUILD 014-123-152-175
    Rundirectory        : /sapdb/data/wrk/SL1
    dbmcli on SL1>db_state
    OK
    State
    ONLINE
    dbmcli on SL1>info log
    OK
    END    
    Name                            | Value
    Log Mirrored                    = NO
    Log Writing                     = ON
    Log Automatic Overwrite         = OFF
    Max. Size (KB)                  = 2032008
    Backup Segment Size (KB)        = 699048
    Used Size (KB)                  = 3824
    Used Size (%)                   = 0
    Not Saved (KB)                  = 3824
    Not Saved (%)                   = 0
    Log Since Last Data Backup (KB) = 0
    Savepoints                      = 1256
    Checkpoints                     = 0
    Physical Reads                  = 2178269
    Physical Writes                 = 4969914
    Queue Size (KB)                 = 16000
    Queue Overflows                 = 21201
    Group Commits                   = 643
    Waits for Logwriter             = 751336
    Max. Waits                      = 4
    Average Waits                   = 0
    OMS Log Used Pages              = 0
    OMS Min. Free Pages             = 0
    dbmcli on SL1>param_getvolsall
    OK
    LOG_MIRRORED                     NO
    MAXLOGVOLUMES                    2
    MAXDATAVOLUMES                   10
    LOG_VOLUME_NAME_001              262145     F  /sapdb/SL1/saplog/DISKL001
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0001            262145     F  /sapdb/SL1/sapdata1/DISKD0001
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0002            262145     F  /sapdb/SL1/sapdata2/DISKD0002
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0003            1048577    F  /sapdb/SL1/sapdata3/DISKD0003
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0004            1048577    F  /sapdb/SL1/sapdata4/DISKD0004
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0005            783501     F  /sapdb/SL1/sapdata1/DISKD0005
    DATA_VOLUME_NAME_0006            783501     F  /sapdb/SL1/sapdata2/DISKD0006
    dbmcli on SL1>param_directget MAXCPU
    OK
    MAXCPU  4
    dbmcli on SL1>param_directget MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT
    OK
    MAX_LOG_QUEUE_COUNT     0
    dbmcli on SL1>param_directget LOG_IO_QUEUE
    OK
    LOG_IO_QUEUE    2000
    Thanks for the explaination of the reserved space for the Log Queue pages.  This does explain why there is the difference between the two.  I think we probably have our log segment size too large.  As you can see we do get occasional log queue overflows.  Do you suggest we increase the size of our log IO queue higher, and allocate more log volume space to compensate?
    select * from SYSINFO.LOGSTATISTICS (on PL1)
    1706328;334176;19;334176;19;1879;20305192;64109066;7806480;182151514;12;48000
    DBMGUI Log Area Usage
    Total Size: 2048.01 MB
    Free Log Area: 1330.38 MB
    Used Log Area: 335.96 MB
    Unsaved Log Area: 335.96
    Log since Last Data Backup: 0.00 MB
    Thanks,
    Mark

  • Why is the Photoshop font size extremely small for their navigation menus and tools?

    Why is the font size for the Photoshop Cloud navigation menus and tools displaying extremely small on my laptop? I can barely see them. The other Adobe Cloud applications don't display small.

    funkotronic13 wrote:
    Is a readable interface an unreasonable expectation?
    Not at all, and we should well expect that Adobe is working on it.  By their own admission they ARE working on it.  I don't sense "deafening silence" at all.  But results won't/can't be instantaneous and they're not going to promise you release dates.  Life is not like that, no matter how many times you click your red shoes together.
    It's not hard to understand that right now only a small minority of Photoshop users are running high dpi screens that can't take advantage of the 200% setting.  And it was the choice of those users to buy such hardware even in light of the fact that Photoshop can't work fully well on it yet.  Adobe didn't force anyone to buy a 150 ppi display.
    Frankly, if you've chosen such hardware even though Photoshop doesn't offer 150% scaling, it's your own fault.  I recently invested well over $1000 in a new monitor and I planned well enough ahead to buy a 100ppi model (Dell U3014, and it's GREAT).  There's a reason that very new technology is called "bleeding edge".  If you want "To Work" instead of "Dealing With Quirks", sometimes you have to be conservative.
    A majority of Photoshop users DO expect new and useful features, however, such as new tools, new camera support in Camera Raw, etc., so Adobe understandably cannot dedicate every resource they have to revamping Photoshop's user interface just for a special few folks who have irresponsibly adopted new display technology.
    We can debate all day how much Adobe ought to be spending on engineering development, but you and I don't run the company.  We don't make business decisions for them.  I do, however, claim to understand their capabilities and limitations - possibly better than most - because I'm in the same business.
    I can only recommend you be patient.  One day Photoshop will respond to your desktop settings.
    What the heck has anybody ever accomplished here, with Adobe, in either fashion?
    Rhetorical or not, some quite tangible things do come to mind...
    At one time I couldn’t paste my clipboard containing a grayscale image into a new document via an action assigned to a key; the color engine would crash.  Today I can do so without incident.
    At one time multiple Help windows would pop up unexpectedly, often when working in the Styles panel.  Today they don’t.
    At one time I had to select Basic GPU mode.  Today I use Advanced GPU mode without a problem.
    Once running Liquify or Smart Sharpen or a number of other things were slow, especially on big images.  Now they're quite fast, with GPU acceleration.
    At one time an action could not write data back to a document when in windowed mode.  Today it works.
    At one time panorama stitching and focus stacking did not work.  Now it works.
    At one time most filters only worked on 8 bits/channel data.  Now many of them can handle 16 bits/channel.
    Once naysayers predicted that the Photoshop Photography bundle would shoot up in price.  Yet today it's still $9.99 a month.
    Once it was impossible to read Photoshop's UI on a 200+ ppi screen.  Now there's a new 200% setting for that.
    I'm sure I can think of other things.  And of course the software isn't perfect today.  It never will be absolutely perfect.
    Station_two, are you keeping up with the latest Photoshop releases?  If not, I submit that your rhetoric may be falling out of date.
    -Noel

  • Why is the illustrator file size this big?

    I create a new illustrator document (Illustrator CS5 - v15.1.0), in that document I create a rectangle with the rectangle tool (fill: white; stroke: black); I save the document (.ai-format; create pdf compatible file active). The file size messures 3.2 Mb.
    Why is that? It's just a simple rectangle with 4 points…

    an empty illustrator document, with PDF compatibility: 1.7Mb;
    an empty illustrator document, without PDF compatibility: 3.2Mb;
    an empty illustrator document, without PDF compatibility; embed ICC profiles not activated: 207Kb.
    So I think it might be the ICC profiles that cause these extended File sizes. However… strange that the second test is larger than the first…
    nevertheless thanks!

  • What data is contained in the export file for a transportable tablespace?

    "This operation will generate an export file, jan_sales.dmp. The export file will be small, because it contains only metadata. In this case, the export file will contain information describing the table temp_jan_sales, such as the column names, column datatype, and all other information that the target Oracle database will need in order to access the objects in ts_temp_sales."
    What is the other information?

    I don't have the sales dump. I was only quoting from the documentation. What i have is an export of 18 tablespaces - 9 partitioned data tablespaces and 9 partitioned index tablespaces.
    What I was trying to determine was if I could still import the tablespaces if the tablespace files were from a time that was after (one week) the original export of the metadata or if there was some bit of information that was held in the metadata which would prevent this.

  • SSRS report Excel Export file size is huge

    Hello everyone,
    I am facing an issue with SSRS report exporting  to Excel.
    Issue : Exported file size is too big.
    I have a matrix report ( parametrized report ) it fetches data from multiple table.
    initially when
    1) I select all parameters all values
    2) load the report after that
    3) exporting to excel
    so exported file size was about 10 Mb to 12MB
    Now, suddenly from this month exported file size is too big around 62 MB for same data,
    I checked on different forums and tried the solutions but it didn't worked,
    can anyone please suggest me on this.
    My environment is
    Visual studio (BIDS) 2008
    SQL Server 2008 R2
    Excel 2007
    Thanks

    Hi UdayKGR,
    According to your description, when you export a report into an excel file, the exported file size is too huge. Now you want to reduce the file size. Right?
    In this scenario, do you export the report into excel 2003 file? When reports are first exported and saved to Excel 2003, they do not benefit from the file optimization that Excel automatically applies to its *.xls workbook files. The larger file size can
    cause problems for e-mail subscriptions and attachments. To reduce the size of the *.xls files for exported reports, open the *.xls files and then resave the workbooks. Resaving the workbooks typically reduces their file sizes by 40 to 50 percent. Also please
    try to install the Reporting Services 2008 R2 Service Pack 2 and reduce the merged columns in exported excel file. For more information, please see the links below:
    Exporting to Microsoft Excel (Report Builder and SSRS)
    problem
    regarding the size of exported report from reporting services to excel format
    SSRS Export to Excel - Performance
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best Regards,
    Simon Hou

  • Why is the version file smaller than the original file, although I didn't make changes in the file? And why is the keywords don't exporting with original files?

    Hi! Why is the version file smaller than the original file, although I didn't make changes in the file? And why is the keywords don't exporting with original files?

    Wild guess: you're using the the wrong export settings. You'll need to tell us more before we can help you - like the export settings you're usng, the size and format of the originals etc.

  • Why do my photo file size increases upon export?!?!

    This is driving me nuts. I have Aperture 1.5.2 referencing an iPhoto library. When I look at the metadata toolset I can see each photo's file size. I have all my photos already resized to fit in an 800x800px box. When I export through Aperture using "export version jpeg original" I get an increased file size. When I export using the master version I don't. I went through and added iptc caption data that only seems to export with the version not the master. I can't believe a line of txt adds so noticeably to the file size. If I need to export my photos with the iptc caption data and want to retain my original file sizes how should I go about it?
    Thanks,
    Michael

    chuck,
    it all depends on 2 factors. a - your original file (pixel dimensions, format, compression level, color and bit depth) and the exported file (pixel dimensions, format, compression level, color and bit depth).
    just as an example - if you take a quite strongly compressed jpg (lets say at 5) and export it to be a less compressed jpg (10 to 12), the file size in kb will be larger, while maintaining the same amount of pixels. what has changed is the way the information are stored within the jpg +(to say it very simplified and without going into details about compression and possible loss of data etc)+.
    if you'd take a high-res 16-bit tif and export it (again at exact same pixel dimensions) as jpg, you'd get a much smaller file, still the same pixels (at least the amount of pixels, however perhaps "lower quality" pixels, depending on compression level, original image, noise, tonality etc etc).
    long (technical) story short: there is no real "one answer fits all" because it heavily depends on your original image. as a rule of thumb however, print files should be in 300 dpi and images for the web in 72.
    in terms of color and bit depth it now depends who you're sending the files to. if you send them to your client, use 8 bit sRGB. if you send it to a graphic designer, i'd send him 16-bit tif files in adobe rgb. all of this makes no sense if your original image was a heavily compressed 8 bit sRGB jpg of course.

  • PE 9 - Why is my exported file larger than the source?

    Hello
    I am new to Adobe Premier Elements 9. I have a Digital Video Recorder connected to my television. It produces MPEG-2 TS VIDEO FILEs. I want to import these into PE9 and just cut out the ads.
    I tried with a source file that is 1GB in size. I imported it and removed the ads but when I export it using Share > Computer and select settings that mimic the source I stll end up with a 3.7GB file. I thought it should be smaller that 1GB because the video is now about 5 minutes shorter.
    In my Export settings I chose:
    Multiplexer: TS
    Audio: Left it untouched
    Video:
    Basic Video Settings:
    Quality = 4
    Everything else set to Automatic (based on source)
    Render at Maximum Depth left unchecked
    Bitrate Settings:
    Encoding: VBR, 1 Pass
    Bitrate Level - Custom
    Min, Target and Max all set to 15
    GOP Settings:
    M Frames: 3
    N Frames: 12
    Is my DVR better at encoding/compressing video that PE9 or are my export setting wrong? Shouldn't the exported file be less that 1GB?

    As Steve points out, there are two parameters, that affect File Size:
    Duration
    Bit-Rate
    With a fixed Duration, the only way to adjust File Size is lower the Bit-Rate (lower Bit-Rate = smaller File Size, but at the expense of quality.
    Now, some CODEC's will allow one to use a lower Bit-Rate, but still retain perceived quality, better than some others, but it is still the Bit-Rate, that affects the File Size.
    Some Export/CODEC options will list the Bit-Rate directly, and MB/sec., where others will instead have a "quality" setting, and the Bit-Rate's MB/sec. will not be directly shown, but will relate to some quality setting.
    One major consideration is what is to be done with the resulting output file. If it is to be used for additional editing, then I feel that File Size is not a big issue, as I want the ultimate quality. If one is delivering the output file, then there are many considerations, from the platform of the recipient's computer, to the player being used, to the necessary quality of the file.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • How can I auto export a PDF File using the "Smallest File Size" preset and set the Exported File Name based on information from an Imported PDF?

    Greetings all,
    I am trying to create a script to automate a PDF export process for my company for inDesign. I’m fairly new to inDesign itself and have no previous experience with javascript, although I did take C++ in high school and have found it helpful in putting this code together.
    We have an inDesign template file and then use the Multi-page PDF importer script to import PDF files. We then have to export two version of each file that we import, then delete the imported file and all of the pages to reset the template. This has to be done for nearly 1000 pdf files each month and is quite tedious. I’m working on automating the process as much as possible. I’ve managed to piece together code that will cleanup the file much quicker and am now trying to automate the PDF exports themselves.
    The files are sent to us as “TRUGLY#####_Client” and need to be exported as “POP#####_Client_Date-Range_North/South.pdf”
    For example, TRUGLY12345_Client needs to be exported as POP12345_Client_Mar01-Mar31_North and POP12345_Client_Mar01-Mar31_South.
    There are two templates built into the template file for the north and south file that are toggled easily via layer visibility switches. I need to get a code that can ideally read the #s from the imported Trugly file as well as the Client and input those into variables to use when exporting. The date range is found in the same place in the top right of each pdf file. I am not sure if this can be read somehow or if it will have to be input manually. I can put North or South into the file name based on which template layer is visible.
    I am not sure how to go about doing this. I did find the following code for exporting to PDF with preset but it requires me to select a preset and then type the full file name. How can I set it to automatically use the “Smallest File Size” preset without prompting me to choose and then automatically input some or preferably all of the file name automatically? (If the entire filename is possible then I don’t even want a prompt to appear so it will be fully automated!)
    PDF Export Code (Originally from here: Simple PDF Export with Preset selection | IndiSnip [InDesign® Snippets]):
    var myPresets = app.pdfExportPresets.everyItem().name;
    myPresets.unshift("- Select Preset -");
    var myWin = new Window('dialog', 'PDF Export Presets');
    myWin.orientation = 'row';
    with(myWin){
        myWin.sText = add('statictext', undefined, 'Select PDF Export preset:');
        myWin.myPDFExport = add('dropdownlist',undefined,undefined,{items:myPresets});
        myWin.myPDFExport.selection = 0;
        myWin.btnOK = add('button', undefined, 'OK');
    myWin.center();
    var myWindow = myWin.show();
    if(myWindow == true && myWin.myPDFExport.selection.index != 0){
        var myPreset = app.pdfExportPresets.item(String(myWin.myPDFExport.selection));
        myFile = File(File.saveDialog("Save file with preset: " + myPreset.name,"PDF files: *.pdf"));
        if(myFile != null){
            app.activeDocument.exportFile(ExportFormat.PDF_TYPE, myFile, false, myPreset);
        }else{
            alert("No File selected");
    }else{
        alert("No PDF Preset selected");
    So far my code does the following:
    1) Runs the Multi-Page PDF Import Script
    2) Runs PDF Export Script Above
    3) Toggles the Template
    4) Runs #2 Again
    5) Deletes the imported PDF and all pages and toggles template again.
    It’s close and much better than the original process which was almost 100% manual but I’d like to remove the Preset prompt from the PDF script and have it automatically select the “Smallest File Size” preset. and then if there’s a way to have it auto-fill in the file name so no user input is required at all other than selecting each file to import. (If there’s a way to setup a batch action for the multi-import script that would be even better!)
    Thanks in advance and if there’s anything else I can provide that would help please let me know! Even a nudge in the right direction will be a big help!

    If you hold down the option key, it will typically show the location. Or you can often hit option-return on the file and it will reveal the file in the Finder, instead of opening it.
    Final option is to open it, and just option-click the filename in the toolbar of Preview and it should show you the location.
    It's probably an attachment to an email you've received. If you have Mail set to cache emails and their attachments it'll be stashed in a subdirectory of ~/Library/Mail. Which is fine.

  • Why the different file sizes?

    Can anyone tell me why some songs are in the 20-30MB range, and most are only 3 or 4MB range? And more importantly, is there any way to shrink down the big ones? They make the CDs I burn very short indeed.

    The file size of your imported songs will depend on your import settings in iTunes. An individual file size of 20-30mb sounds like you are importing in WAV or Apple Lossless. mp3 or AAC will have the same file size when using the same bitrate. For example, the average 4 minute song imported in AAC @ 128 kbps will have a file size of 3-4mb.

  • Size of the export file

    Hi Guys,
    solaris 9 oracle 9i
    How can one tell the size of the export file.
    Thank you all.

    You mean what size of export file will be after your database export?
    It depends on your database's size

  • How can I make the pdf file size smaller?

    How can I make the pdf file size smaller?

    Hi vickyb,
    Reducing the file size of PDF requires Acrobat (one way is by choosing File > Save As > Reduced Size PDF). If you don't have Acrobat, you can try it free for 30 days. See www.adobe.com/products/acrobat.html for more information.
    Best,
    Sara

  • I have to zip pdf files to email them to someone with a PC. The problem is they aren't smaller after zipping and I can't email them. I tried adjusting the Quartz filter to the Reduce file size. Now they're smaller, but the recipient can't read them. Help!

    I need to zip pdf files to email them to a PC user. The problem is file size is not reduced.
    I tried zipping them in Win 7 (which I use via Parallels 7) and sending them to the Finder to email.
    But lately nothing is reduced.  I tried choosing the Reduce File Size option in the Quartz Filter when I save the doc. The file size was reduced. However, the recipient could not read the file. Everything was blurry.
    Is there a solution?

    I am having some PDF sizing issues also, I am a BETA tester for TurboCAD Mac, and with the usage of (public) version 5, I have had some scaling issues. I have had (auto sent) 15 plus crash reports, (available as text) and had posted my scenario within the "lion- problems so far" article, so not to use up extra bandwith- or whatever- there are pictures there. I was not able to upload a PDF on site, and the staff @ Turbo CAd is working on it also. this is Lion specific new update, as I have posted many large format PDF's
    Here (edit to add url)
    Thanks for the helps!
    Johnny

  • Why is Keynote storing images 20x larger than the original file size upon import?

    In Keynote, I'll add a 150KB PNG image to a slide and the 500KB presentation goes to 3.7MB... a more than 3MB increase. I'm trying to troubleshoot large file sizes as a simple deck takes up 50-100MB on disk. Anyone know what is going on to make the file 20x larger once added to Keynote? And how I can keep the file size down? The 'Reduce File Size' option is worthless in this case... offering a less than 10% reduction on the earlier 20x amplification. Thanks

    Chris H 71 wrote:
    This was originally in Keynote 09.
    Yes converting an existing version 5 file in to Keynote 6 does many strange things. Any existing version 5 files I have, I continue to edit in 5. When starting a new presentation, I can use 6 without many problems at all.
    I provided the files to replicate the issue to Apple support and never heard back.
    Apple do not provide feedback to users on issues, they only request information from users.

Maybe you are looking for