Why it takes long time to establish Database Connection ???

Can any one please have a look on the following code snippet and show me which mistake I'm doing so it take long time to connect to DB(more than 5 minutes !!!!)
Thanx in advance ...
try{
Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
Class.forName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver");
String dbString2 = "jdbc:oracle:thin:@" + "127.0.0.1" + ":" + "1521" + ":" + "nat";
aCon = DriverManager.getConnection(dbString2, "scott", "tiger");
stmt = aCon.createStatement();
System.out.println("Connection to DB Established");
catch (ClassNotFoundException cnfe)
System.out.println("Class not found:");
cnfe.printStackTrace();
catch (SQLException sqle)
System.out.println("SQL Exception: " + sqle.toString());
sqle.printStackTrace();

Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
Why do you need this if you are going to Oracle. Try
removing this. It might be trying things out with the
old driver and then moving to the new driver. This has nothing to do with it. (And it doesn't "try things out")
>
Also check your machines. They might be slow. There is
no reason, it should take more than few hundred
milliseconds to connect to a database on localhost as
your case is.Possible reasons...
- Network traffic
- Faulty router/gateway
- Busy server
- Faulty network card (either end)
- Conflict with another box

Similar Messages

  • Why it takes long time to download and udates for iphone4

    why it takes long time to download and updates for iphone4 ?

    Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
    Why do you need this if you are going to Oracle. Try
    removing this. It might be trying things out with the
    old driver and then moving to the new driver. This has nothing to do with it. (And it doesn't "try things out")
    >
    Also check your machines. They might be slow. There is
    no reason, it should take more than few hundred
    milliseconds to connect to a database on localhost as
    your case is.Possible reasons...
    - Network traffic
    - Faulty router/gateway
    - Busy server
    - Faulty network card (either end)
    - Conflict with another box

  • Why it takes long time to shut down after i upgrade to OS X ver 10.8.2?

    why it takes long time to shut down after i upgrade to OS X ver 10.8.2?

    Can't really say, but I see this occurring on all of my Macs since the 10.8.2 update and keep reading about it at several other Mac user boards.
    Bottom line: it's a general problem, but more of an inconvenience, than a serious problem. Probably will be solved with the next update.

  • Why it takes long time (about 10 Min) to map the network drivers in windows 8.1?

    Why it takes long time (about 10 Min) to map the network drivers in windows 8.1? I don’t have this problem with any other operating systems (Ex: Windows 7 or XP)

    Can you perform a refresh ?
    Arnav Sharma | http://arnavsharma.net/ Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
    the thread.

  • Why it takes long time to execute on Production than staging?

    Hi Experts,
    Any help apreciated on below issue.
    I have one anonymous block for updating around 1 million records by joining 9 tables.
    This is proceeded to production by following environments. And all env have exact equal volume of data.
    development->Testing->Staging->Production.
    The funny problem is while it takes 5 mins to be executed in all environments, it takes 30 mins on production.
    why it happned and what can be action points for future?
    Thanks
    -J
    ==============
    If the performance is that different in the different environments, one or more statements must have different query plans in the different environments. The first step would be to get the query plans and compare them to figure out which statement(s) is/are running slowly.
    If there are different query plans, that implies that something is different between the environments. That could be any of
    - Oracle version
    - initialization parameters
    - data
    - object statistics
    - system statistics
    If you guarantee that the data is the same, I would tend to expect that the object statistics are different. How have you gathered statistics in the various environments? Can you move statistics from an environment where performance is acceptable to the environment where performance is unacceptable?
    I would also recommend following the advice others have given you. You don't want to commit in a loop and you want to do as much processing in SQL as possible.
    Justin
    ===============
    Thanks Steve for your inputs.
    My investigation resulted following 2 points.
    There are 2 main reasons why some scripts might take longer in live than on Staging.
    1: Weekend backups were running on the live server so slowing the server down allot.
    2: the tables are re-orged when they are imported into staging/Dev – so the table and index layout is optimal, on live the tables and indexes are not necessarily contiguous so in order to do the same work the server will need to do many more I/O operations.
    Can we have some action points to address these above issues?
    I think if data can be contigous then it may help.
    Best Regards
    -J
    ===============
    But before that, can you raise this in a seperate thread as there is a different issue going on in this thread?
    Cheers
    Sarma.
    ===========
    Posts: 4
    Registered: 08/28/06
    Re: Performance issue (Oracle 10.2.0.3.0)
    Posted: May 22, 2009 2:46 AM in response to: Radhakrishna Sa... Edit Reply
    Hey Sarma,
    Exterme aplogies to say that I don't know how to raise a new thread.
    Thanks in advnce for your help.
    -J
    user636482
    Posts: 202
    Registered: 05/15/08
    Re: Performance issue (Oracle 10.2.0.3.0)
    Posted: May 22, 2009 2:51 AM in response to: user527345 Reply
    Hi User 527345,
    Please follow the steps to raise a request in this Forum.
    1. Register urself.
    2. Go to the forum home and select the Technolgy where do you want to rasie a request.
    eg : If is related to Oracle DATAbase general then select Oracle databse general...
    3. clik on post new thread
    4. Give the summary of your issue.
    5. then submit the issue.
    please let me know if you need more information.
    Thank you

    Jayashree Mohanty wrote:
    My investigation resulted following 2 points.
    There are 2 main reasons why some scripts might take longer in live than on Staging.
    1: Weekend backups were running on the live server so slowing the server down allot.
    2: the tables are re-orged when they are imported into staging/Dev – so the table and index layout is optimal, on live the tables and indexes are not necessarily contiguous so in order to do the same work the server will need to do many more I/O operations.
    Can we have some action points to address these above issues?
    I think if data can be contigous then it may help.First , I didn't get at all what actually was that thing when you copied some part of don't know which post in your actual question? Please read this , it would help you post a proper question to get a proper answer ,
    http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
    Now, how did you come to the conclusion that the backups are actually making your query slower? What's the benchmark that you lead to this? And what's the meaning of the 2nd point , can you please explain it ?
    As others have also mentioned, please post the plan of the query at boththe staging and production, that only can tell that what's going on.
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Airport extreme takes long time to establish stable Wifi to Internet connection

    Hi,
    I am using Airport Extreme together with Airport express (to extend the Wifi signal). When I connect my MBP, MBA or my PC to the Wifi network it takes (in 90% of cases roughly) quite a long time - even up to 20mins - to get stable Internet connection. The connection drops due to time-outs or with "DNS server cannot be reached" messages. Connectivity on my local network is just fine and does not seem to show similar behavior. After some time all settles down and my connection is fast and stable. The strange thing is that my iPads are not affected by this - i.e. I can browse internet fast on my iPad, but my MBP cannot reach a single internet page at the same time. When I switch to wired connection, everything is just fine from the beginning - no time-outs etc. Sometimes it helps to switch the Airport Extreme off and on again, but it's about a 50/50 chance.
    Anyone got an idea what's going on?
    Thanks a lot for help!

    You have wireless gremlins.. plus voodoo..
    It is the nature of the beast.
    My recommendation is to clean up, simplify and start over.
    1. Reset the AE to factory and start over. This time use all short names no spaces and pure alphanumerics. Same for passwords but longer.
    2. While you have problems try using different names for the two bands.. eg AE24ghz and AE5ghz
    3. Use fixed channels.. 11, 8, 6 in that order for 2.4ghz and usually one low and one high for 5ghz.. say 36 and 149. (actual number depend on geo-region).
    4. Reset the Express to factory and test extend on both the 2.4ghz and 5ghz.. (assuming gen2.. if gen1 just 2.4ghz). The express must get excellent signal to transmit excellent connection.. if it is poor then it will make things worse not better.
    5. Use the apple wireless diagnostics.. to help you determine how the signal is in various parts of the house.
    diagnostics
    http://osxdaily.com/2012/07/31/wi-fi-scanner-mac-os-x-mountain-lion/
    http://support.apple.com/en-au/HT202663
    There are plenty of these available .. paid for and free but since it is built in give it a go.
    6. Setup IPv6 to link-local only.
    This setting is here.
    7. In the client computers with issues.. clean out all current wireless names.. reboot the computer and rediscover the wireless again.. put in the password and set to remember the network.
    With Yosemite.. wireless issues are a given.. expect them.. they are part of the deal.
    You might even need to do a clean install of the OS.. any upgrade install to Yosemite with issues should be treated as so normal.. it is just always going to happen.

  • Report takes long time in different database version

    Dear Mates,
    I have been in serious problem from last one month. Still i don't get any solution. Come to the problem.
    I have a program where, database version is *9i R2*. Here one report are base on a database function and works perfectly. It takes 30/35 seconds to preview.
    I take this schema backup by EXP command and import it to database version XE and also database version *10G R2* with IMP command. import is successful. Others report still preview as it is at 9i. But my mentioned reports didn't come as same. Now it takes 3 Hrs. :(.
    I run explain plan and the out put is bellow. What should i do now ? If you want to check the query i can also post it. If any one have experience regarding this, please help me.
    Plan hash value: 3745590339
    | Id  | Operation                      | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |             |  9454 |  1874K|   207  (55)| 00:00:03 |
    |   1 |  SORT GROUP BY                 |             |  9454 |  1874K|   207  (55)| 00:00:03 |
    |*  2 |   HASH JOIN                    |             |  9454 |  1874K|   205  (55)| 00:00:03 |
    |*  3 |    INDEX FAST FULL SCAN        | IND_AD_ID   |  9454 |   120K|   201  (55)| 00:00:03 |
    |   4 |    INLIST ITERATOR             |             |       |       |            |          |
    |   5 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL     |  1351 |   250K|     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  6 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG |     8 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
       3 - filter("ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",:UNIT,:PROJ)<>0)
       6 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=6 OR "ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=7 OR "ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=8
                  OR "ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=18 OR "ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=19)
    Note
       - dynamic sampling used for this statementupper explain plan is from database 10g R2
    bellow r from 9i R2
    | Id  | Operation                      |  Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost  |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |              |       |       |       |
    |   1 |  SORT GROUP BY                 |              |       |       |       |
    |   2 |   CONCATENATION                |              |       |       |       |
    |   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |   4 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |*  5 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |*  6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    |   7 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |   8 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |*  9 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |* 10 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    |  11 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |  12 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |* 13 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |* 14 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    |  15 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |  16 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |* 17 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |* 18 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    |  19 |    NESTED LOOPS                |              |       |       |       |
    |  20 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACC_DTL      |       |       |       |
    |* 21 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN          | IND_AD_FLAG  |       |       |       |
    |* 22 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN           | IND_AD_ID    |       |       |       |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       5 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=19)
       6 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
       9 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=18)
      10 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
      13 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=8)
      14 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
      17 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=7)
      18 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
      21 - access("ACC_DTL"."AD_FLAG"=6)
      22 - access("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID"="ACC_DTL"."AD_ID")
           filter("ERP"."ACC_BALANCE"("ACC_LEDGER"."LG_AD_ID",TO_NUMBER(:Z),TO_N
                  UMBER(:Z))<>0)
    Note: rule based optimizationEdited by: HamidHelal on Oct 12, 2011 6:42 PM

    yes..
    SELECT ALL ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, ACC_DTL.AD_NAME, abs(ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ) )BAL,
    CASE WHEN ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)>0  AND ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN(6 ,18) THEN
                'RECEIVABLE'
               WHEN  ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)<0  AND ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN(6,18)  THEN
                'PAYABLE'
                 WHEN ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)>0  AND ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN(7,8,19)  THEN
                'PAYABLE'
                WHEN ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)<0  AND ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN(7,8,19)  THEN
                'RECEIVABLE'
                END AS BALANCE_TYPE,
    ACC_DTL.AD_CODE, ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG
    FROM ACC_DTL, ACC_LEDGER
    WHERE ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG IN (6, 7, 8,18,19)
    AND (ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID = ACC_DTL.AD_ID)
    AND ACC_BALANCE(ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, :UNIT, :PROJ)<>0
    GROUP BY ACC_LEDGER.LG_AD_ID, ACC_DTL.AD_NAME, ACC_DTL.AD_CODE, ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG
    ORDER BY   ACC_DTL.AD_FLAG , ACC_DTL.AD_NAME;here ACC_BALANCE is the database function name..

  • Why GPS Takes long time to start in E90

    i do have an E90, everytime i start the MAP the GPS takes more than 10minute to start and sometimes it dosent start unles i plan a route so i start using external GPS is there any updates or a way to raise the performance of the GPS??

    Incorrect.
    A-GPS is used to speed up the TTFF or sat acquisition. Nokia is using the TI chip in the N95 and the E90 rather than the better SIRFstar III chipset.
    A-GPS is new.
    Show the KUDOS button some love.... Hit that bad boy.... It don't hurt....
    Apple iPhone 5,
    Retina MacBook Pro, iPad Mini, Nikon D4

  • Why it takes long time to query ldap using the filter (uid=*) after deleting all(140000) the entries from the LDAP.

    The platform we are using is Iplanet 5.1 running on Solaris 8 with Sun 280R dual processor 900Mhz with 4GB ram

    Are you using replication? If so, this may be due to the fact that the database is now full of tombstone entries. So, how do you get rid of the tombstone entries? That depends on your update rate and the number of servers you replicate to, plus how painful it is to reinitialize all of the consumers.
    If your tombstone purging is too aggressive, you risk losing state information you need during update resolution.
    If you don't care about any of this, the easiest thing to do is to export your database then reimport. After this, you will have to reinitialize the other servers as well.

  • My query take long time..

    The output of tkprof of my trace file is :
    SELECT ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY ,ENEXT.COD_BUSUN ,ENEXT.DAT_CALDE ,ENEXT.COD_SHFT
    FROM
    AAC_EMPLOYEE_ENTRY_EXITS5_VIW ENEXT ,PDS.PDS_EMPLOYEES EMPL ,
    PDS.PDS_EMPLOYMENT_TYPES EMPTYP ,PDS.PDS_PAY_CONDITIONS PAYCON WHERE
    ENEXT.DAT_CALDE BETWEEN :B6 AND :B5 AND ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY IN (SELECT
    ATT21 FROM APPS.GLOBAL_TEMPS WHERE ATT1 = 'PRSN') AND ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY =
    EMPL.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY AND EMPL.EMTYP_COD_EMTYP = EMPTYP.COD_EMTYP AND
    EMPTYP.LKP_COD_STA_PAY_EMTYP <> 3 AND
    NVL(EMPL.LKP_MNTLY_WITHOUT_ENEXT_EMPLY,2) <> 1 AND EMPL.PCOND_COD_STA_PCOND
    = PAYCON.COD_STA_PCOND AND NVL(EMPL.LKP_MNTLY_WITHOUT_ENEXT_EMPLY,2) <> 1
    AND PAYCON.LKP_FLG_STA_PAY_PCOND = 1 AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE >=
    EMPL.DAT_EMPLT_EMPLY AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE <= NVL(EMPL.DAT_DSMSL_EMPLY,
    TO_DATE('15001229','YYYYMMDD')) AND 1 = (CASE WHEN
    ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 2 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 1 AND
    ENEXT.TYP_DAY BETWEEN 4 AND 6 THEN 0 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 2
    AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 1 AND ENEXT.TYP_DAY NOT BETWEEN 4 AND 6 THEN
    1 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 2 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 2
    THEN 0 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 1 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB =
    1 THEN 1 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 1 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB =
    2 THEN 0 END) AND ENEXT.LKP_COD_DPUT_BUSUN = NVL(:B4 ,
    ENEXT.LKP_COD_DPUT_BUSUN) AND ENEXT.LKP_COD_MANAG_BUSUN = NVL(:B3 ,
    ENEXT.LKP_COD_MANAG_BUSUN) AND ENEXT.COD_BUSUN = NVL(:B2 , ENEXT.COD_BUSUN)
    AND ENEXT.COD_CAL = NVL(COD_CAL, ENEXT.COD_CAL) AND ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY =
    NVL(:B1 , ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY) AND ENEXT.COD_SHFT IN (SELECT
    SHFTBL.COD_SHTAB FROM AAC_SHIFT_TABLES SHFTBL WHERE
    SHFTBL.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 1) AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE NOT IN (SELECT ABN.DAT
    FROM APPS.AAC_EMPL_EN_EX_ABNORMAL_VIW ABN WHERE ABN.PRSN =
    ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY AND ABN.DAT BETWEEN :B6 AND :B5 ) AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE
    IN (SELECT EMPENEXT.DAT_STR_SHFT_ENEXT FROM AAC.AAC_EMPLOYEE_ENTRY_EXITS
    EMPENEXT WHERE EMPENEXT.EMPLY_NUM_PRSN_EMPLY = EMPL.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY AND
    EMPENEXT.DAT_STR_SHFT_ENEXT BETWEEN :B6 AND :B5 AND
    EMPENEXT.LKP_FLG_STA_ENEXT <> 3) ORDER BY ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY,
    ENEXT.DAT_CALDE
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 2 40.45 40.30 306 17107740 0 24
    total 6 40.45 40.30 306 17107740 0 24
    what is wrong in my query?
    why it take long time?

    user13344656 wrote:
    what is wrong in my query?
    why it take long time?See PL/SQL forum FAQ
    https://forums.oracle.com/forums/ann.jspa?annID=1535
    *3. How to improve the performance of my query? / My query is running slow.*
    SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
    For instructions on what information to post an how to format it.

  • Database Connectivity takes long time if one of the Node is down .. ??

    Hello All,
    Env: 10.2.0.4 on Solaris 10
    I have 2 nodes.
    When Node1 server is down, it takes long time to connec to the database.
    tnsping would give "OK(2050ms)". Below is the tnsalias.
    RAC_test  =
      (DESCRIPTION =
         (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST=20.268.169.123)(PORT= 1521))
         (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST=20.268.169.127)(PORT= 1521))
         (LOAD_BALANCE = yes)
              (CONNECT_DATA =
            (SERVICE_NAME = DK.com)
          (FAILOVER_MODE =
            (TYPE = SELECT)
            (METHOD = BASIC)
            (RETRIES = 180)
            (DELAY = 5)
    )I put the trace on sqlnet.ora and found that first it pings to the "20.268.169.123",
    since the Server is down there will not be any reply and this consumes the delay and
    later it would ping "20.268.169.127" and connect to it.
    If i keep "20.268.169.127" above "20.268.169.123" in tnsalias, and keep "LOAD_BALANCE=no",
    it gets connected very fast, as its directly connecting to Node2. In tnsping i get Ok(40ms).
    How do i reduce the connect timing if i use the first step. Why does it take long time for
    Oracle Client to understand that the Node1 Server is down ?
    TIA,
    J J

    I hope the IP's you are using in the TNS are Virtual IP's.
    You must use Virtual IP's / hostnames for the failover to be quick. If Node 1 is not available then then it's (Node 1's) virtual IP would also get assigned to Node 2 hence all client connections are still able to get a response from the Node Virtual IP address without needing to wait for TCP/IP timeouts. This helps clients to get notified immediately that node 1 is unavailable and the connection tries the 2nd ip/host in the connect descriptor.
    Hope this helps.
    - Siba

  • HT4759 Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why

    Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why I need to deactivate the space service and take my money back .. Thanks

    The "issues" you've raised are nothing to do with the iCloud service.
    No service that uploads data allows you to disconnect the device you are uploading from while uploading data. Doing so would prevent the upload from completing. It is a basic requirement for any uploading service that you remain connected to it for uploading to be possible.
    The time it takes to upload data to iCloud is entirely dependent on how fast your Internet connection is, and how much data you are uploading. Both of these things are completely out of Apple's control. Whichever upload service you use will be affected by the speed of your Internet connection.

  • Why outlook2011 mac version* takes long time to boot with OSX

    why outlook2011 mac version* takes long time to boot with OSX

    Okay, so after doing all of the above, the computer still takes between 40 seconds and 1 minute or so to boot up, and the VersionCue messages still appear. However I discovered that the "kdcmond cannot retrieve..." messages disappeared after I disabled my ethernet connections. So at least I know that that had nothing to do with the extended boot-up time.
    I have heard that the more RAM you have, the longer it takes to boot due to the RAM count. Since I have 10 GB, maybe this is why?
    I've included the most recent Console messages below:
    22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchctl.System[2] launchctl: Please convert the following to launchd: /etc/mach_init.d/dashboardadvisoryd.plist
    22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.adobe.versioncueCS3) Unknown key: ServiceDescription
    22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (org.cups.cups-lpd) Unknown key: SHAuthorizationRight
    22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (org.cups.cupsd) Unknown key: SHAuthorizationRight
    22/4/08 9:56:16 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (org.ntp.ntpd) Unknown key: SHAuthorizationRight
    22/4/08 9:56:39 AM com.apple.SystemStarter[28] Starting Aladdin USB daemon
    22/4/08 9:56:39 AM org.ntp.ntpd[25] Error : nodename nor servname provided, or not known
    22/4/08 9:56:39 AM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.UserEventAgent-LoginWindow[74]) Exited: Terminated
    22/4/08 9:56:39 AM com.apple.launchctl.Aqua[90] launchctl: Please convert the following to launchd: /etc/machinit_peruser.d/com.adobe.versioncueCS3.monitor.plist
    22/4/08 9:56:42 AM com.apple.launchd[82] (0x1011e0.VersionCueCS3monitor) Failed to check-in!

  • Why update query takes  long time ?

    Hello everyone;
    My update query takes long time.  In  emp  ( self testing) just  having 2 records.
    when i issue update query , it takes long time;
    SQL> select  *  from  emp;
      EID  ENAME     EQUAL     ESALARY     ECITY    EPERK       ECONTACT_NO
          2   rose              mca                  22000   calacutta                   9999999999
          1   sona             msc                  17280    pune                          9999999999
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.05
    SQL> update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1';
    update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1'
    * ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
    Elapsed: 00:01:11.72
    SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
    update emp set esalary=15000
      * ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
    Elapsed: 00:02:22.27

    Hi  BCV;
    Thanks for your reply but it doesn't provide output,  please  see   this.
    SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
    ........... Lock already occured.
    >> trying to trace  >>
    SQL> select HOLDING_SESSION from dba_blockers;
    HOLDING_SESSION
                144
    SQL> select sid , username, event from v$session where username='HR';
    SID USERNAME     EVENT
       144   HR    SQL*Net message from client
       151   HR    enq: TX - row lock contention
       159   HR    SQL*Net message from client
    >> It  does n 't  provide  clear output about  transaction lock >>
    SQL> SELECT username, v$lock.SID, TRUNC (id1 / POWER (2, 16)) rbs,
      2  BITAND (id1, TO_NUMBER ('ffff', 'xxxx')) + 0 slot, id2 seq, lmode,
      3  request
      4  FROM v$lock, v$session
      5  WHERE v$lock.TYPE = 'TX'
      6  AND v$lock.SID = v$session.SID
      7  AND v$session.username = USER;
      no rows selected
    SQL> select MACHINE from v$session where sid = :sid;
    SP2-0552: Bind variable "SID" not declared.

  • Why the LMS topology Service takes long time to reflect the device availability status?

    In the topology services map, the color status of the router takes long time to move from red to green and vice versa.
    i have already configured the time interval in the fault monitor poller setting to 6minutes but the only thing reflected the little mark at the top of the icon itself. anyhow the topology service still believe that the devices are unreachable. i have waited almost 45 minutes and nothing happened.
    please let me known the trick to make the topology services act more quicker .
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

    Topology Services isn't really designed to be a near real time network device up/down tool. It will an change icon's status as a result an ANI engine polling cycle or an admin operator-initiated manual device rediscovery. While you can increase the frequency of polling cycles, that's not usually such a good idea as you could make the server be polling constantly and never completing a job.
    To ascertain near real time fault status one should refer to the Fault Dashboard.

Maybe you are looking for

  • SSO based on NT account for BI Publisher

    Dear all, We have setup SSO for OBIEE presentation based on NT authentication by following Chapter 8 of Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition Deployment Guide. and it is working fine. but when I try to open more products-> BI publisher it t

  • Calling SQL Stored Procedure using Oracle Gateway

    Hi Do you know how i can call a stored procedure with parameters from Oracle using oracle gateway?

  • Gc cr grant 2-way

    deal all, I found much events about gc cr grant 2-way in my db, what cause the event?

  • How to delete order created against notification

    hi gurus, Someone tell me how to delete order created against notification. & also PR created against it. Regards, Radhika

  • Revenue Recognition user-exit documentation

    Hi SD Gurus, Does anyone have any documentation on below mentioned user-exits for Revenue Recognition. For e.g. how they are used, scenarios, examples etc. would be of great help. Event      Description      00503101      Revenue realization: Copy co