Why we should considering Ajax framework...

Hi' i'm really confused about this question. Why we shoud consider about ajax framework??
My question are :
1. If we are using ajax framework, it will make our ajax code become not standard. does it good or not? what's the solution?
2. For now, those framework are open source. but until when it still become open source? if we are dependent with those framework, i think that's not a good solution.
3. Is it good solution for not using framework, of course it will make more difficult to develop. But i think this is good solution. true or not?
Thanks...

1. if you always use the same framework it becomes a standard within your own environment and that is what you want to aim for
2. they are javascript libraries, you cannot close source javascript. None of the framework developers will ever do that anyway because developers will simply migrate to a framework that is not closed source.
3. it is not like when you plug in an ajax framework that your applications will suddenly be better than all the others out there. they are only a tool, and you can choose to use it or not. If you need a lot of the features in such a framework then use it, otherwise don't.

Similar Messages

Creator and futureproof AJAX framework ?

Hi,
I am glad there are a couple of AJAX enabled Creator JSF components. No doubt over the next year or so there will be more, and richer AJAX JSF components from SUN.
What should one use now to make the best of Creator and AJAX ?
I see current options as ICEFaces, jMaki, or Dojo, etc. I would prefer to stay with JSF components rather than a 'lower level' AJAX framework. I would hate to lose the ability to use the Java Row Sets and Data Providers from Creator that make so easy to get data from databases. Design time drag and drop of components is nice, but I could live without it for a while if need be.
I am hoping for JSF features such as communicating with other components (click one button and a table does an AJAX refresh), drag and drop, pop-ups, etc.
Any suggestions on how to achieve AJAX now while making the most of Creator and not digging into a hole for the future ?
Thanks,
JC

You might want to consider the jMaki framework. See http://blogs.sun.com/divas/entry/using_the_dojo_combobox_in

Iphoto on my macbook pro has stopped working. It comes up with a message saying that the library is either being used by another user or it is unreadable. Any ideas why I should be receiving this message?

MacBook Pro 2009
Model Identifier: MacBookPro5,1
Processor 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
Memory 4 GB 1067 MHz DDR3
Software OS X 10.8.5 (12F45)
Iphoto '11
Iphoto on my macbook pro has stopped working. It comes up with a message saying that the library is either being used by another user or it is unreadable. Any ideas why I should be receiving this message?
"Your photo library is either in use by another application or has become unreadable"
Offered solution doesn't work:
Shut down and restart your computer, and then open iPhoto again. If the problem persists, try rebuilding your photo library. To do this, quit iPhoto, and then reopen it while keeping the Option and Command keys pressed. You can also try restoring your photo library from a backup.
I have already copied my photographs to the a library manager but when I tried to reuse iphoto and import the photos back into iphoto, it would not let me.
I can't download photographs from my iphone or my digital camera.
Any ideas on how I can solve this problem?
There is a possibility that when I went to update applications that I started to install Mavericks which I then interrupted and cancelled. I am not definite that this caused this problem but it was at about the same time as when this problem started.
Many thanks,
Ed

I have already copied my photographs to the a library manager but when I tried to reuse iphoto and import the photos back into iphoto, it would not let me.
You can't "copy" your photos to the "library manager", there is just no way to any such thing.
Option 1
Back Up and try rebuild the library: hold down the command and option (or alt) keys while launching iPhoto. Use the resulting dialogue to rebuild. Choose to Repair Database. If that doesn't help, then try again, this time using Rebuild Database.
If that fails:
Option 2
Download iPhoto Library Manager and use its rebuild function. (In early versions of Library Manager it's the File -> Rebuild command. In later versions it's under the Library menu.)
This will create an entirely new library. It will then copy (or try to) your photos and all the associated metadata and versions to this new Library, and arrange it as close as it can to what you had in the damaged Library. It does this based on information it finds in the iPhoto sharing mechanism - but that means that things not shared won't be there, so no slideshows, books or calendars, for instance - but it should get all your events, albums and keywords, faces and places back.
Because this process creates an entirely new library and leaves your old one untouched, it is non-destructive, and if you're not happy with the results you can simply return to your old one.
Regards
TD

Re: Whence should come the frameworks?

At 03:44 PM 6/20/98 +0200, Daniel Nguyen wrote (on the polymorphic
polymorphism thread:
Is it a battle between Forte and Sage ?One hopes not, but this reminds me of an interesting question that I would
like to throw out for comment. With any product like Forte, any given
release can only cover so much. Some of what it does not include is core
infrastructure and for that one has simply to work around or wait. But,
there is also a lot which it does not cover which is within the scope of
others to provide. This is particularly apparent in the case of Express
and Conductor where one can clearly extend that which comes from Forte or,
to be more extreme, one can offer an alternative, especially in the case of
Express.
These extensions and alternatives are really a necessary part of getting
work done, but for those with a mind to it, they also present a business
opportunity, either for direct sale to other Forte shops or as a part of
the value-add in a consulting agreement. But, as one moves on to
subsequent releases, there is a natural tension which arises because Forte
is likely to incorporate some of these same extensions into the product.
E.g., various frameworks have provided security components, but R4 will
have its own security component. Forte is also likely to provide
extensions to Express which are not already in a competing framework and
users of that framework will then not benefit automatically by that
extension unless the framework provider works to include the extension as
well.
My impression, correct or not, is that most framework providers are
offering their products as alternatives to Express and, as such, are
essentially competing with future versions of Express. I.e., in the
current release, one can argue that the competing framework is a better
foundation, but if future versions of Express make substantial strides, as
seems to be the expectation, then the providers of that framework have the
difficult task of making equal or greater strides in order for it to
continue to be the case that their offering is still arguably better.
At least one company, DS Data, has taken the alternate position of layering
their products on Express and Conductor. This would seem to put their
users in a somewhat better growth position since future extensions to
Express should be fairly easily incorporated, either by replacing the
previously external component or simply by being added to what is
available. One might argue that this graceful growth potential has been
achieved at the compromise of having to accept the Express and Conductor
foundations as given, but the importance of this is something we each will
have to judge for ourselves. But, even DS Data has the risk that Express
and/or will advance so rapidly as to take over all of the added features
and functionality now provided by their extensions. Their customers should
be OK since this will simply that the extensions are subsumed into the
core, but it does mean that they either lose a product in the future or
have the challenging task of continuing to stay meaningfully ahead.
It seems clear that the more that comes from Forte itself, the more the
Forte community as a whole benefits so I would hope that no one would
advocate that Forte curtail its framework development in order to leave
that market open for the partners. But, if Forte does proceed agressively
on framework development, then, to some extent, it is competing with
partners that provide frameworks. Moreover, as partners do create core
functionality like frameworks, they are creating things which would benefit
the Forte community as a whole, but they cannot expect the whole community
to purchase their framework. I.e., Company X may have some piece of their
framework which is particularly useful, but Company Y has something else
and neither are integrated with Express which one may have chosen if for no
other reason than to stay in optimal tune with what Forte is doing. As
things stand, unless these pieces can be componentialized and the companies
involved are willing to offer them as such as separate products, the only
way the Express user has of getting this functionality is to develop it
themselves or wait for Forte to add it to Express.
What I would like to ask, then, is what people think of what it is that
Forte could do to make this overall structure work better? Not that I see
it as working badly, especially compared to some other environments that I
have seen, but just that there are some real problems without obvious easy
answers.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Thomas,
I think you have brought up a really good question and one that deserves
some attention by all:
customers, partners and Forte. The advent of third-party tools for the
Forte marketplace is an interesting prospect. If I take my companies
product (SCAFFOLDS), the original impetus for building such a thing, was not
to offer an alternative to Forte Express, but to offer an alternative to
building applications with raw Forte. And as such, we have not targeted,
feature compared or analyzed Forte Express to help build or sell any part of
our product.
I think the reason for this is that many of us in the framework business do
not see ourselves as having a competing product to Forte Express. The
reason for this is that we have taken on applications with our products that
Forte themselves would not pitch Express at. The architectural descriptions
in SCAFFOLDS have been used to do everything from simple to very complex GUI
development to Database persistence or communications to satellites.
Because of this, there is some overlap of functionality, but certainly we
see Forte Express being used for a much more limited class of application.
I would question the assertion that it is good for Forte to build more. I
think Forte, like any company, has a limited amount of engineering muscle.
With this muscle they should be concentrating on their core products that
make the company profitable. If I look at their product line-up, clearly
the Forte Development Tool is the make or break product. They should rely
more on the marketplace to provide solutions for things that are outside of
their core products. I sort of take the opposite tact. It seems clear that
the more a third party marketplace finds outlets for their solutions the
more diverse solutions we are likely find in that marketplace. As an
example, if you look at the Visual Basic marketplace, clearly it is big with
many, many solutions because Microsoft defined some specs for add in
components and let the marketplace provide solutions.
I think Forte could spend more time opening up their tool for additions by
third-party vendors. For example, things like object introspection, an open
repository and dynamically adding widget types would do wonders for the
number and kinds of solutions that would exist in the Forte marketplace
today if this was done a version or two ago. Instead, I think Forte spent
much of their engineering muscle on other kinds of products, like Forte
Express. Whether this strategy will pay of for them remains to be seen, but
certainly if they enter the Java world, they will have to change their
current strategy with regard to support to third-party solutions. The Java
marketplace is very diverse today and Forte will have to allow more
third-party integration to be taken seriously in that market.
Mark Perreira
Sage IT Partners.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[<a href="mailto:[email protected]">mailto:[email protected]]On</a> Behalf Of Thomas Mercer-Hursh,
Ph.D.
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 1998 11:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Whence should come the frameworks?
At 03:44 PM 6/20/98 +0200, Daniel Nguyen wrote (on the polymorphic
polymorphism thread:
Is it a battle between Forte and Sage ?One hopes not, but this reminds me of an interesting question that I would
like to throw out for comment. With any product like Forte, any given
release can only cover so much. Some of what it does not include is core
infrastructure and for that one has simply to work around or wait. But,
there is also a lot which it does not cover which is within the scope of
others to provide. This is particularly apparent in the case of Express
and Conductor where one can clearly extend that which comes from Forte or,
to be more extreme, one can offer an alternative, especially in
the case of
Express.
These extensions and alternatives are really a necessary part of getting
work done, but for those with a mind to it, they also present a business
opportunity, either for direct sale to other Forte shops or as a part of
the value-add in a consulting agreement. But, as one moves on to
subsequent releases, there is a natural tension which arises because Forte
is likely to incorporate some of these same extensions into the product.
E.g., various frameworks have provided security components, but R4 will
have its own security component. Forte is also likely to provide
extensions to Express which are not already in a competing framework and
users of that framework will then not benefit automatically by that
extension unless the framework provider works to include the extension as
well.
My impression, correct or not, is that most framework providers are
offering their products as alternatives to Express and, as such, are
essentially competing with future versions of Express. I.e., in the
current release, one can argue that the competing framework is a better
foundation, but if future versions of Express make substantial strides, as
seems to be the expectation, then the providers of that framework have the
difficult task of making equal or greater strides in order for it to
continue to be the case that their offering is still arguably better.
At least one company, DS Data, has taken the alternate position
of layering
their products on Express and Conductor. This would seem to put their
users in a somewhat better growth position since future extensions to
Express should be fairly easily incorporated, either by replacing the
previously external component or simply by being added to what is
available. One might argue that this graceful growth potential has been
achieved at the compromise of having to accept the Express and Conductor
foundations as given, but the importance of this is something we each will
have to judge for ourselves. But, even DS Data has the risk that Express
and/or will advance so rapidly as to take over all of the added features
and functionality now provided by their extensions. Their
customers should
be OK since this will simply that the extensions are subsumed into the
core, but it does mean that they either lose a product in the future or
have the challenging task of continuing to stay meaningfully ahead.
It seems clear that the more that comes from Forte itself, the more the
Forte community as a whole benefits so I would hope that no one would
advocate that Forte curtail its framework development in order to leave
that market open for the partners. But, if Forte does proceed agressively
on framework development, then, to some extent, it is competing with
partners that provide frameworks. Moreover, as partners do create core
functionality like frameworks, they are creating things which
would benefit
the Forte community as a whole, but they cannot expect the whole community
to purchase their framework. I.e., Company X may have some piece of their
framework which is particularly useful, but Company Y has something else
and neither are integrated with Express which one may have chosen
if for no
other reason than to stay in optimal tune with what Forte is doing. As
things stand, unless these pieces can be componentialized and the
companies
involved are willing to offer them as such as separate products, the only
way the Express user has of getting this functionality is to develop it
themselves or wait for Forte to add it to Express.
What I would like to ask, then, is what people think of what it is that
Forte could do to make this overall structure work better? Not that I see
it as working badly, especially compared to some other environments that I
have seen, but just that there are some real problems without obvious easy
answers.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>
>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

Custom Branding Using the AJAX Framework L-Shape APIs

Hello folks,
i want to do this Tutorial (How To Apply Custom Branding Using the AJAX Framework L-Shape APIs) but i'm missing the source code.
Can anyone of you provide me with the necessary files?!
It was once located in Sap Code-Exchange (https://code.sdn.sap.com/svn/sap-portal-ajax-framework)
Thanks in advance.
Greetings,

I downloaded in May 2014 two EARs with a custom AFP from SAP:
com.customer.afp.fromscratch.ear
com.customer.sdesign.ear
I also have the images shown in the pdf....
If interested, send me an email (see profile).
Kai

My MacBook Pro doesn't start; in safe mode shift CMD V the message "disk0s2: media is not present" is written on the screen repeatedly but the MacBook doesn't start. Do you have any ideas of why this should be or what I should do to resolve this?

My MacBook Pro doesn't start; in safe mode <shift CMD V> the message "disk0s2: media is not present" is written on the screen repeatedly but the MacBook doesn't start. Do you have any ideas of why this should be or what I should do to resolve this? Thanks Eamonn

Thanks for these suggestions: I have tried safe mode re-starts (both "verbose" and simple "shift" + power) to no avail. I get the error message "disk0s2: media is not present". Following this I inserted the installation disc and from there ran disc utility. The "Verify Disk" indicated an error " invalid sibling link" which it could not repair.
I also tried to completely re-format/erase the disk, but again got an error message "disk object invalid or unable to serialize".
Any ideas of what could be causing this or the best solution? I fear I am fast running out of options.

Ajax Framework Navigation Detection

Hi
We are currently adapting a component to work with every framework on the portal.
This component has to detect navigation(and respective node) and then do a amount of actions on pre-defined services with Java Code.
The problem is as far as i can understand the Ajax framework uses client Side Events to navigate(using LAPSI javascript) and the navigation_helper_service .getCurrentSelectedNode does not work.
How can i track the last navigation made in this Framework?
Thanks

Hi,
This issue is an application issue and not a OBN issue as the application has already rendered.
I have found this note that may be helpful to you:
2040099 - On click of 'ReviewCart' error occurs 'Object or set with GUID 0000000000000000000
does not exist'
BR,
Etay

Ajax Framework Page

Is there a tutorial or article on how to create or customize your own Ajax Framework page on the portal for the SAP Netweaver CE 7.2 version?
Vijay

Hi,
i think this is quite helpful tutorial on how to create own custom Ajax-based framework.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b0adc900-edb2-2d10-6482-bdf4870eb35c
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Alex
Edited by: Alexander Schnaidt on Oct 15, 2010 12:26 AM

Why I should enter my credit card details if I just want to get free application?

Starting from last month I am unable to download any free application which contains in app purchase service.
Why I should enter my credit card details if I just want to get free application? I am close to go to Android

I see, prepaid card is good solution but I don't want to share my card details at all. I can't download any
application during a month due to this new feature with credit card verification and I am really close to switch
to Nexus and go with Google. I don't want to do it but Apple forces me.

Why we should give currency type 30 in 2nd local currency ?

Hi,
why we should give currency type 30 2nd local currency in Define Currencies of Leading Ledger. Here 30 indicates EUR only. I want to give USD as 2nd local currency.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Gangaraju

Group currency is unique at client level, i.e. this is same for all company codes.
go to scc4
Check the currency of your client.
This currency comes by default for group currency and you can't give as your own.
If you have any requirement, then you can give it as third local currency.
Also remember third local currency you have to maintain at first country level.
Rgds
Murali. N

Any reason why I should use Safari on my PC

I use Mozilla now. I now have an Iphone. Is there any reason why I should download and use Safari on my PC? I expect the functions will be different from IE or Mozilla or maybe better, but is it a good idea to download and use since I have an Iphone?

It's pretty irrelevant, unless you really want to sync bookmarks from your computer to your iPhone (you could do that with IE as well, but not Firefox).

Why we should use Macros if we have function Module

Why we should use Macros if we have function Module and what is the Advantage of Macros than function Module
Moderator Message: Interview-type questions are not allowed.
Edited by: kishan P on Oct 7, 2010 2:22 PM

Put it this way... if you have blueprints for a car you wouldn't want to produce only one car, would you? You would want to produce as many as needed. In another example, you don't want to be able to use only 1 window in Windows. Each window has common features but have different values. That's the purpose of non-static entities
However, there are instances that you want to have only one value for something. That's when you use static entities.
Get it? =)

ORA-06508,ORA-06512, why I should re-connect and after that it runs well?

I have 2 package.
package A depends on B.
I call the package A in c++ code. At the begining, all work well.
I compile package B successfully.
But when I call package A in c++ code using a existing connection to the oracle, I get
ORA-06508: PL/SQL:
ORA-06512: 在 "PARTY.PKG_TRANSACTION", line 102
ORA-06512: 在 "PARTY.PKG_CFMMC", line 1186
when I kill this session in database server side and re-connect to the database, it runs well.
what is wrong, why I should re-connect and then it runs well, and in the mean time, it does raise errors above if I use the old connection?

It appears sometimes. But sometimes it does not appear.
you can create 2 package.
package a, package b.
A depends on b.
You can call the package A in the client side using c++ code.
then compile the b(do not change and code of b, just recompile it) successfully.
If you are lucky you can see the errors.

Ajax Framework Page - Customized and Modified

Dear All,
I am trying to Customize and Modify the default ajax framework page. So with the help of the [SDN Document |http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70bfe58d-1ed9-2d10-42b6-821d62777d6f?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&50599009721255] I tried to implement the same.
We have SAP NW Enterprise Portal 7.3 and NWDS 7.3 SP05.
I created the portal Application Project and portal component and added all the needed css, script, html and images.
Below is the code of my portal component:
package com.sap.itelo.framework.page;
import com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.*;
import com.sapportals.portal.prt.resource.IResource;
public class ITelOFramework extends AbstractPortalComponent
    public void doContent(IPortalComponentRequest request, IPortalComponentResponse response)
         IResource navigationCSS = request.getResource(IResource.CSS, "css/style.css");
         response.include(request, navigationCSS);
         IResource menuCSS = request.getResource(IResource.CSS, "css/menu.css");
         response.include(request, menuCSS);
         IResource navTreeSource =
         request.getResource(IResource.STATIC_PAGE,"html/framework.html");
         response.include(request,navTreeSource);
         IResource navigationJs =
         request.getResource(IResource.SCRIPT,"scripts/navigation.js");
         response.include(request, navigationJs);
I deployed the application and created Framework Page Iview based on the deployed application. When I previewed the page, I noticed the navigation Script page is not loaded. That means, I didn't get detailed navigation on the framework page.
Please tell me where I went wrong and how to resolve this error.
Regards
Eben Joyson

Hi Eben
I am facing the same problem. Did you find a solution for this?
Thanks and best regards
Christophe

Information About AJAX Framework Page

Hi,
We recently implemented one portal with EHP1. We find ajax framework page in the pcd.
I already go through some of the documents available in SDN.
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/00b99527-da5b-2b10-e4b9-81fb9317f28b]
Even i search help.sap.com release note for EHP1. But didnot found anything regarding this frame work page.
Please tell us, whether we can use this in produciton environment? Can we customize this one? For example i need to use a masthead iview which is on default framework(not ajax) in this new (ajax) framework.
Regards
Baby

Hi,
[Ajax Framework Page (AFB) - Introduction and Architecture|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/50047b5f-e52c-2d10-5e83-cb73a108134b]
[Ajax Framework Page Features and Benefits|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/800249ff-e42c-2d10-ecbb-d393415534c5]
[AFP at ASUG|http://www.agendasap.com/agenda/usa2010/sessiondetails.epx?sessionid=17899&agendaitemtype=2&keynotes=false&mode=standalone]
Regards
Baby

Why we should considering Ajax framework...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for