Will JSF handle a really huge webpage?

HI. I know Struts2 & JSP. My career hinges on the ability to create a WebApp that can display 6000 pieces of data on ONE WebPage. struts2 can't do it. Neither can using the C TagLib. Can someone tell me that JSF can handle this kind of volume. Speed is an issue, but right now, I just want to know if it is feasible? If not, do you have a recommendation?

My recommendation would be to redesign your UI. Nobody can handle 6000 items on a web page. Page it, make it searchable, ...

Similar Messages

File Place an image brings in a really huge graphic

Hi All,
I have just started using InDesign CS6 and I am trying to place images in between paragraphs of text for a book.
When I place the image it comes in really huge, breaks the text and disappears, so I can't even see the image to reduce its size. Once I find the image, I use the second pointer and ctrl shift to reduce the size of the panel that the picture is in. This panel outline keeps turning brown and hiding part of the picture instead of reducing its size. When I can get the picture panel outline to turn blue, then I can resize the picture.
However I find this process really awkward. Is there a better way to bring a picture into an InDesign document at a small, manageable size?
I find this process with the brown and blue boxes really hard to do, and very hard to understand.
Thanks for your help folks!

It sounds like you're jumping in before you have learned the basics of the program. Maybe you don't feel you have the time, but you will probably waste more time poking around trying to find the answers than you would learning the basics at the beginning. Sandee Cohen's book has been recommended by many people as a good place to start, and you will find videos, from the free ones on YouTube to the subscription videos at Lynda.com and other sources, as there's always the tutorials in the InDesign Help file. I can get you over this little hump, but give my suggestion some consideration.
You can place an object on the pasteboard by not having a text cursor in the text when you place. When the image is ready to be placed, just click somewhere there is nothing and that's where it will make a free-standing image. You can then size the image by using the Selection tool (black arrow) and dragging one of the sides or corners while holding the Command key (Mac OS, probably the Alt key on Windows). If you want the image to resize proportionally, hold the shift and Command before dragging a corner or side. Using the Direct Select (white arrow) will allow you to change the content or the frame (the container) independently, which works well for cropping the image within the container. You can switch between Select and Direct Select by double-clicking on the image, so that might be what's going wrong for you. There is also a circle that appears when you place the cursor over the image, and if you click on it to drag, you move the image inside the frame, but the frame remains stationary (which is another thing that newbies struggle with). Once the image is around the size you want, you can copy it with the Selection tool, switch to the type tool, place the cursor where you want the image to be placed and paste. Also, since InDesign isn't a word processor, you don't need to anchor the image within the text if that isn't what you want. The freestanding image may be placed anywhere you like, and text can be made to wrap around it if you like by going to Window>Text Wrap (wrap is applied to the thing you want to repel the text, so don't apply it to the text itself unless you want the text frame to repel text in other frames).
That's a start, but you will find things much easier once you do a little homework. Good luck, and come on back if you need help, but as with many online forums, the more you try to help yourself, the better treatment you will get from the forum users who might think you want them to do your work for you. Just sayin…

Internet Explorer will not open a password-protected webpage

I've asked this question in the General Discussion forum but
did not find a solution. I am using DW8.0.2 / MySQL 4.1 / PHP5.1 to
create PHP login and restricted access webpages. Locally (i.e.
Windows XP / IIS5.0), they all function properly no matter what
browser I use. However, on my ISP's server that running Linux /
Apache, Internet Explorer 6.x or 7.x will not open the
password-protected webpages - all the other php pages open and
function properly. I can use Opera, Netscape, or Firefox and the
pw_protected webpages open fine - just not in IE.
I've tried cookies on / off, popup blocker on / off, and
changed my PHP login scripting - all to no avail. Any one have any
ideas why IE won't open a PHP-scripted pw-protected webpage while
all other browsers can?

Thanks for your suggestion. I've added the site to IE's
Trusted Zone... but no luck. And to test further, I've turned off
EVERY 'disable' feature I could in IE and still no joy.
Could the problem be how IE proceses (or doesn't process) my
PHP logon scripts and possibly does not pass the session on to
Apache (the server is a Linux box running Apache)? I'm enclosing my
scripts for review and hopefully for a discovery of why this is
happening only in IE and not the other browsers.
Here is my logon script:
<?php
// *** Start the session
session_start();
// *** Validate request to log in to this site.
$FF_LoginAction = $HTTP_SERVER_VARS['PHP_SELF'];
if (isset($HTTP_SERVER_VARS['QUERY_STRING']) &&
$HTTP_SERVER_VARS['QUERY_STRING']!="") $FF_LoginAction .=
"?".htmlentities($HTTP_SERVER_VARS['QUERY_STRING']);
if (isset($HTTP_POST_VARS['Username'])) {
$FF_valUsername=$HTTP_POST_VARS['Username'];
$FF_valPassword=$HTTP_POST_VARS['Password'];
$FF_fldUserAuthorization="Status";
$FF_redirectLoginSuccess="bulletin_edit.php";
$FF_redirectLoginFailed="access_error.html";
$FF_rsUser_Source="SELECT Username, Password ";
if ($FF_fldUserAuthorization != "") $FF_rsUser_Source .= ","
. $FF_fldUserAuthorization;
$FF_rsUser_Source .= " FROM tblaccess WHERE Username='" .
$FF_valUsername . "' AND Password='" . $FF_valPassword . "'";
mysql_select_db($database_leathernecks, $leathernecks);
$FF_rsUser=mysql_query($FF_rsUser_Source, $leathernecks) or
die(mysql_error());
$row_FF_rsUser = mysql_fetch_assoc($FF_rsUser);
if(mysql_num_rows($FF_rsUser) > 0) {
// username and password match - this is a valid user
$MM_Username=$FF_valUsername;
session_register("MM_Username");
if ($FF_fldUserAuthorization != "") {
$MM_UserAuthorization=$row_FF_rsUser[$FF_fldUserAuthorization];
} else {
$MM_UserAuthorization="";
session_register("MM_UserAuthorization");
if (isset($accessdenied) && false) {
$FF_redirectLoginSuccess = $accessdenied;
mysql_free_result($FF_rsUser);
session_register("FF_login_failed");
$FF_login_failed = false;
header ("Location: $FF_redirectLoginSuccess");
exit;
mysql_free_result($FF_rsUser);
session_register("FF_login_failed");
$FF_login_failed = true;
header ("Location: $FF_redirectLoginFailed");
exit;
?>
And here is the script that appears on each restricted
webpage:
<?php
// *** Restrict Access To Page: Grant or deny access to this
page
$FF_authorizedUsers=" edit";
$FF_authFailedURL="access_error.html";
$FF_grantAccess=0;
session_start();
if (isset($HTTP_SESSION_VARS["MM_Username"])) {
if (false ||
!(isset($HTTP_SESSION_VARS["MM_UserAuthorization"])) ||
$HTTP_SESSION_VARS["MM_UserAuthorization"]=="" ||
strpos($FF_authorizedUsers,
$HTTP_SESSION_VARS["MM_UserAuthorization"])) {
$FF_grantAccess = 1;
if (!$FF_grantAccess) {
$FF_qsChar = "?";
if (strpos($FF_authFailedURL, "?")) $FF_qsChar = "&";
$FF_referrer = "Restricted Area";
$FF_authFailedURL = $FF_authFailedURL . $FF_qsChar .
"accessdenied=" . urlencode($FF_referrer);
header("Location: $FF_authFailedURL");
exit;
?>
Any ideas, suggestions or help is greatly appreciated.

Starting to Shoot HD will PC Handle in Premiere

I've just joined the 21st century by switching to HD camcorders for a project. The live production is captured from three camera angles and a sequence is created where we fade and cut between the three video tracks. I have been fine capturing in 480i and importing as .avi in previous years. When I bought my PC, I found the most affordable windows 7 64 bit machine I could find that met the recommended specs for CS6. Core i7, 900 lines, 4 GB RAM. I did not realize that the HP 8440p, will only handle a maximum of 8 GB RAM which is frustrating as I thought 64 bit OS machines would take unlimited RAM. Here are my questions for the experts.
Can I get away with 4GB RAM for 3 HD video tracks? If not, am I safe if I upgrade to the maximum 8GB RAM.
Also my Canon camcorders will capture AVCHD or MP4, should I go with MP4 to avoid taxing the system, or will AVCHD do well with 4GB RAM/ 8 GB RAM i7?
Lastly, we are still just making DVDs, but I may want a Blu Ray "print" to maybe make Blu Ray copies of the project in the future, is there a way to simultaneously cut sequences that can easily be made into DVD or Blu Ray. I've never used premiere or encore with HD assets before, so I appreciate any feedback. Thank you!

Your graphics card is limited severely in its capabilities. A new much bigger card with more memory of its own will help considerably.
http://www.videoguys.com/Guide/E/Videoguys+DIY+10+++Our+wait+for+Thunderbolt+is+over/0x869 59ff2ee4098c3eef68b2070f368dd.aspx
The link is to the videoguys website, they are specialists in making NLE systems and their DIY guides show component kit that works.
If at some stage you wish to update your PC then take their DIY guide to your local PC shop and ask them to add motherboard, CPU, RAM and GPU to match the guide.
I am in the UK and have never used them to supply anything but their website is a mine of useful information.

Please help. Does anyone have a solution re: After the latest update my display has really huge fonts and is unusable

After the latest update my display on my iphone has really huge fonts and is unusable.
I can't even get the swipe bar.

The easiest way to turn off the zoom accessibility feature is to connect your phone to iTunes on your computer. In the Summary pane, click the "Configure Universal Access..." button. On the next screen, under "Seeing", select "Neither" and click OK.

One eight core xserve, will it handle what I need it to do?

My new xserve specs are eight cores @ 2 ghz, 4 gig ram, 2 TB raid 5.
I will have 150 macbook clients, that will not be on netboot. I want to store user home folders, and authenticate. Will this server be able to handle ichat and ical servers for about 20 users? Do I need another server for just ichat and ical or will one handle authentication, home folder storage, ichat(20 users), and ical (20 users)? Apple salesman says that he suggests another just for ichat/ical, but I have been told that I can get away with just one.
I eventually want to get another for backup directory server and can migrate ical/ichat but would like to put it off until later.
Thanks for help on this.

Try posting your question in the Xserve forum (http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=854). Users there will be more knowledgeable about your question.

How can I post/embed an iPhoto album to my website? This album will be updated constantly and my webpage needs to reflect that...

How can I post/embed an iPhoto album to my website? This album will be updated constantly and my webpage needs to reflect that...

That is not a feature of iPhoto. If it s possible you would need a third party application which I doubt if exists
LN

Slow Macbook pro, ~1 year old; Really HUGE Page Ins and Page Outs size, think 400 GB In vs 100 GB Out

Hi everyone, I have a macbook pro and it's so slow. After scouring the internet a lot, and CCleaning my computer 359802 times and using Onyx, I finally realized why it's so s low.....my Page Ins and Page Outs are so big. I have attached a screenshot that illustrates this.
I am not sure how my computer ballooned to this size, but it makes sense why it's like a turtle and is slower than my 4 year old Sony.
Can someone help me?? I am not sure what processes to get rid of and I feel like Google Chrome is taking up huge amounts of my Ram. I mean yeah I open Google Chrome and run like 8 tabs and have Word and iTunes open, but my 4 years old Sony could run faster than this and I used to open like 12+ tabs on Chrome while running Word, Excel, Powerpoint, iTunes, and VLC on my Sony. Which was nowhere near as powerful as this computer. Supposedly.
My computer Specs are:
2.3 GHz Intel Core i5
4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 RAM
Intel HD Graphics 384 MB
Mac OS X Lion 10.7.4
I would really appreciate any advice to get this down to normal.....since I hear most ppl have page ins and page outs in the MB or even KB. Right now I'm running Google Chrome, Word, Ppowerpoint, iTunes, and Adobe PDF Reader. I don't think this should be too unreasonable of work load.
Thank you

The problem is not that your page ins are big, as that value resets when you reboot the system. However, your page outs are are almost 25% of your page ins, which means you can use more memory for the applications you run. A page out is done when memory is full, and the system needs to add something else to memory, so it writes some memory to the hard drive to make room. The guideline to add more memory is 10% to 15% page outs greater than page in's, and yours are more than that.
Your MacBook Pro can handle up to 16GB of memory. You might want to consider upgrading to 8GB, which would double what you have today. OWC and Crucial are two sources for quality memory. $42 for 8GB from Crucial, and you can usually find a % off coupon on retailmenot.com.

Is the current 13" MacBook Air powerful enough to run 2D autocad in bootcamp smoothly? If so, how will it handle 3d rendering software such as Rhino.

My girlfriend has recently purchased the new 13" Macbook Air (3rd gen Intel processor). It is the base model (ie. 1.8GHz i5 processor, 4GB RAM, etc).
I have checked on the autodesk website for their Windows 64-bit autocad system requirements and they all seem to be met, even to the recommended levels. However we havent actually tried running it because we havent gotten a copy of Windows on the machine yet. Also, she has a rendering software called Rhino, which ran fairly smoothly on my pc (its about 2 years old but was top of the line then), but I feel we are not up to par on the system requirement "OpenGL graphic card recommended".
If anyone could offer some guidance as to weather we should keep the MacBook Air it would be appreciated. I think the alternative would be to buy a Windows laptop because of cost, which wouldn't be nearly as exciting.

It's not a hard core gaming rig, but it plays all the FPS games I like, quite well. It handles hi-def video, just fine. I use it for Photoshop, and it is quite fast. For web browsing, it has no equal. The 2010 maxed out 11" would do it all, except for some hi-def video (1080P), which it would stutter. But my new 2011 maxed 13", is perfect for video (1080P=no problem).
I really don't think a MBP will give you as much, on a daily basis. It (the MBP) has only a few advantages, and except for the built in optical drive (which you can still go external, if need be), none of the advantages you will miss even slightly.
I think the MBP would only serve me, if it spent most of the time deskbound, but I would still need an SSD. Once you have had an SSD, you can't go back. Then, you would have a really pricey MBP.

How do you handle and distribute huge amounts of data?

I've got about 315 channels and will be collecting data at about 1300 Hz. Data collection will last about 3-4 minutes. I'm at a loss on how to distribute the data to researchers for evaluation. These researchers will not have LabView or any other NI software to use. I've tried the TDM stuff, and the add-in for excel 2007 but the files are just too large for excel to handle in a timely manner. It took just over three hours to open one of my test files. Anybody have any suggestions on how to manage and distribute files this large?

Frank Rizzo wrote:
Well I'm sitting in Cleveland Ohio right now so I am going to have to disregard your message.....hahhahaha...
I'll be curious to see if Jamal Lewis's yardage improves for you guys this year after having some definite dropoffs with us the last couple.
Though now that he's not playing against you, your defense's numbers against the run should improve.
I'd be surprised if you could get that data to the researchers at all using Excel. It has a limit of 256 columns and 65536 rows. If you had a column per channel and a row per data point, you'd be talking 315 columns and 312,000 rows for 4 minutes of data. I guess you could always break it up into several files being sure to leave some rows and columns to give them a chance to do some data calculation.
Out of curiosity, I created a spread sheet where every cell was filled with a 1. It took a good 30 seconds to save and was over 100 MB. That was probably about 1/10 of the amount of data your dealing with. And going back to my earlier calculations, I would guess that as a text file, that much data would need about 10 bytes per value thus getting you to about 1 GB in text files.
I would ask them what kind of software they will use to analyze these files and what format they would prefer it in. There are really only 2 ways to get it to them, either ASCII text file which could be very large, but would be the most flexible to manipulate. Or a binary file, which would be smaller, but there could be a conflict if they don't interpret the file the same way you write it out.
I haven't used a TDM file add-in for Excel before. So I don't know how powerful it is, or if there is a lot of overhead involved that would make it take 3 hours. What if you create multiple TDM files? Let's say you break it down by bunches of channels and only 20-30 seconds of data at a time. Something that would keep the size of the data array within the row and column limits of Excel. (I am guessing about 10 files). Would each file go into Excel so much faster with that add-in that even if you need to do it 10 times, it would still be far quicker than one large file? I am wondering if the add-on is spending a lot of time figuring out how to break down the large dataset on its own.
The only other question. Have you tried the TDMS files as opposed to the TDM files? I know they are an upgrade and are supposed to work better with streaming data. I wonder if they have any improvements for larger datasets.

When will quicktime handle avchd already ?!?

I was hoping with the release of Leopard we would see an all new Quicktime that could handle avchd file natively ! It sure would be nice to copy a m2ts file over to the mac and just ' play ' it. It would also be nice to just use quicktime to do simple cuts and trims of the file and then save it in its native format would be super nice..... is this gonna happen ? Is it in the pipeline ?
I tried using Nero8 for the pc and while it plays the file its just not Quicktime... throw us a bone Apple

As far as I understand it, it's not the manufacturers but the AVCHD standard that allows SD AVCHD (by which I mean 480i/576i) to use PCM (1,500 kbps) and limits HD AVCHD (by which I mean 720p/1080i/1080p) to AC3 (640 kbps).
Winston:
As I indicated previously, I was only reviewing the the basic capabilities and not a "white paper" document delving into the technical specifics. As to use of PCM as opposed AC3, it is logical to me and the workflows I use as a home consumer. Will readily agree that an avid audiophile would likely consider 7.1 PCM far superior to AC3 mono, stereo, 5.1 or even 7.1 multichannel in the same way some videophiles now refuse to watch SD TV programming. For instance, at this moment, I am only using a mono 64 Kbps AAC audio channel for today's "batch list" containing Santaclause Conquers the Martians, Teenagers from Outer Space, Mole Men Against the Son of Hercules, Hercules Against the Moon Men, Hercules and the Captive Women, Hercules and the Tyrants of Babylon, Hercules Unchained, The Lost Jungle, Mesa of Lost Women, Assignment: Outer Space, and Laser Mission. Frankly, the harder decision for me was deciding whether or not to retain what is left of the faded, color-casted content or to simply store it as a B&W of better viewing quality. Like QTKirk, I am a creature of habit and tend to resist change. And, as you can easily see from my profile, am quite satisfied sticking to the older tape devices which, as you yourself have pointed out in the past, in and of themselves function as "source" media archives. To put it another way, my personal outlooks determine what seems logical to me. If others see things differently and their "logic" has a somewhat take, then that is also fine with me and is what makes the world go round.
QuickTimeKirk:
Really had to chuckle when I read your comment, sitting here as I am in the middle of converting files for TV which have, over the last half dozen years been converted to VCD, SVCD, DVD, QVGA iPod, and now to a single VGA iPhone/iPod/TV file format for management, storage, and viewing. Can only assume that if I live to see the day when we are storing audio/video content in a crystal lattice, that I will likely still be converting these same files to that medium. (Especially funny since I had to order another 1 TB LaCie drive for additional storage space just this week and it arrived only moments ago.)
In any event, sorry about getting so far off the OP's original subject. Take care all...

Mail handles .Mac really badly-what's up?

Since I put my .Mac email account into my Mail application, it has worked really badly and I am considering just deleting off the .Mac account and not using it anymore as it is so annoying. Essentially, having the .Mac account in Mail slows everything else (my other email accounts) down to a ridiculous level. When I check "All", and sometimes when I send even one email, the Activity Viewer shows me that Mail is struggling to open .Mac mailboxes and stuff like that, and while it is struggling to do various things with .Mac, including synchronizing, the other email accounts are held up in the queue (ho hum... very boring). To prevent this, I went into the .Mac account and unchecked the "Include when automatically checking for new mail", but this has no effect whatsoever, probably because I usually check for new mail manually anyway.
I have two Macs at present, an older G4 flat panel iMac (1.25 Ghz), and a brand new dual core intel MacBook (2Ghz) and the problem is exactly the same on both Macs. Anyone having similar problems or knows a fix to this? Would love to hear!

There is a setting under the Advanced tab for the
account preferences to not keep all messages and
their attachments available for offline viewing but I
don't use this setting and don't experience the same
problems.
To clarify, do you mean that you "do not" keep all messages (etc.) available for offline viewing, or that you "do" keep all messages (etc.) available? At present, I have this option to "keep all messages and attachments available for off-line viewing" checked positive, by default I presume.
After first creating the account if there
are a number of server stored mailboxes and messages
available on the server, the mailbox and message
synchronization process takes longer than normal and
the time it takes for subsequent synchronization
should not be a real long process unless a number of
changes have been make with server stored mailboxes.
Odd thing is that I only have one saved message in the .Mac account, and that is a tiny weeny one (about 10K) with no attachments or anything! By the way, since I have just been going through everything all over again, I notice that what really seems to be holding things up (I've now changed synchronization to "manual" on both computers) is when I "Get Mail" and Mail is trying to open the .Mac mailbox - this goes on interminably (as I can see in Activity Viewer).
Try using the Rebuild Mailbox function on all server
stored mailboxes. All messages will disappear
temporarily and the mailbox will be resynchronized
with the server.
Sorry for being dense, but I've been all over my Mail application and all over my .Mac settings and I can't find this "Rebuild Mailbox" function. Could you please tell me exactly where I can find this Rebuild Mailbox function?
Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Any ideas why PE7 will not handle avi from Pentax Optio w60?

I am able to work with the avi video files on all of my other software editing programs but PE7 is my favorite. For some reason when I import the avi files from my SD card / Pemtax Optio W60 camera I can only hear the audio in the editing window...no video.
I am not 100% on this but I have seen some postings on the Pentax forum that says the Pentax AVI video is NOT using DiVX or XvID compression... it is saved using the DV codec. I am not certain that is the codec used on this model...or what that would mean anyway.
I would appreciate any and all information, suggestions and recommendations to resolve this.

There are two good MJPEG CODEC's that work with the Nikon D-90 material and will allow editing in PrPro. The MainConcept and the Morgan have done well. Do not know how well PE will handle it, but if not well, Steve's advice will get it into PE as a DV-AVI Type II file.
Good luck,
Hunt

How i will configure handling unit(3shirt in one pocket and 10 pocket in ca

Hi MM guru,,,
i want to know how Handling unit is configured..
actually my client is garment company...
senero is shirt pack in one pocket..and 10 pocket pack in one cartoon...
then how i will configure this and in sales order what will be material code.....i have confusion
kindly suggest me...
how i will sale the cartoon.from which material code
kindly suggest me in detail
Regards
Aqueel

Packing Material ---> MM01
material group packing materials( sales: general/plant)
packing material type
Raw material/Finished Goods
Mat group pack matls (Basic data)
Note : System picks the packing materials based on the packing material group defined in the raw material/ Finished Goods .
PACKING INSTRUCTION
1.POP1
packing material and Refrence material is given.
(with target quantity )
2.POP1
packing instruction made and packaging material is given.
(with target quantity )
3.POF1
Condition record
Reference material for Material packed .
ok ,

Is Apple working on a fix for ios6 that will stop it from using huge data in the iphone 4s?

When I upgraded my iPhone 4s to ios6, it started using huge amounts of data. My provider refuses to reimburse me. Today they told me that Apple has acknowledged the problem and has fixed it in ois6.3. However, ois6.3 is unavailable for the 4s, and my provider tells me that Apple has not acknowledged that the problem exists in the 4s. They referred me to Apple. However, because the phone is off warranty, I will have to pay $35 + tax to talk to an Apple rep--and surely Apple knows the problem extends to the 4s, because it is widely discussed on-line. I have not seen any reference to whether Apple is working on a fix for the 4s. Does anyone know? I can't afford this much longer and am going to have pay a lot of money to switch phones. And when I switch phones, it won't be an Apple, which will also make me sad--but it is ridiculous for them to produce a problem that is costing so much money and then not to acknowledge it exists. I am hoping that having addressed it in the 5, they will now turn to the 4s. Does anyone know?

Yeah, the 6.0.2 update was rolled out to deal with that issue amongs others. But getting it out for the older models was either not high priority or more complex than they anticipated. So the wait continues till it shows up on the update channel.
Pestering Apple Support might not get it done quicker, but at least will offer some sort of vicarious revenge and relief.

Will JSF handle a really huge webpage?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for