Windows 7 firewall problem

Hi,
I'm trying to develop a test application for P2P communication via Cirrus and came up to following problem with my Windows 7 firewall:
How is my app designed to work: The application generates key (initConnection) on one side, then I manually copy the key to the other machine and connect again. Init send stream and receive stream on both of them should make the communication available. Whole code is attached below, it's just some sample code I downloaded somewhere for testing purposes.
#edit: you can check working copy of the application here: http://peskovi.cz/p2ptest/P2Pplugin.html
My setup: I've got two computers in my local network (connected through cable to same switch), Windows and Linux. However it seems I'm having the same trouble connecting to distant computers as swell.
My problem: It seems that Windows 7 is partially blocking my connection. The thing is, when I init the connection on Windows and then copy the generated code to Linux and connects there, connection's not working at all. However, when I do it the other way (init on Linux and copy generated code to Windows), everything works just fine. Also, when I turn off firewall on my Windows it works fine both ways too. I have several reasons to believe there might be something wrong with my app:
1) The sample app on Adobe Labs (http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/cirrus/samples/) works just fine both ways.
2) RTMFP should be bidirectional protocol right? Doesn't make a lot of sense to me, why would I be able to connect to existing connection, but I wouldn't be able to start a new connection? That should pretty much use the same resources (ports), shouldn't it?
3) If this is just a common thing with Windows 7, it would mean Cirrus is pretty much unusable for me, but I haven't seen any posts about this anywhere, which is suspicious.
I'm new to AS/Cirrus/flash so there might be something really noobie I'm missing, so I'd be very glad if there would be someone wiling to help me with any hints why is it not working, what should I do, or just explain to me that I have to deal with the fact that it simply cannot be done and (mainly) why.
Thank you very much,
Jan
My application code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml" layout="absolute">
    <mx:Script>
        <![CDATA[
            private const SERVER_ADDRESS:String = "rtmfp://p2p.rtmfp.net/";
            private const DEVELOPER_KEY:String = "key";
            private var nc:NetConnection;
            private var myPeerID:String;
            private var farPeerID:String;
            // streams
            private var sendStream:NetStream;
            private var recvStream:NetStream;
            private function initConnection():void{
                if(txtFingerprint.text){
                    farPeerID = txtFingerprint.text;
                nc = new NetConnection();
                nc.addEventListener(NetStatusEvent.NET_STATUS,ncStatus);
                nc.connect(SERVER_ADDRESS+DEVELOPER_KEY);
            private function ncStatus(event:NetStatusEvent):void{
                trace(event.info.code);
                myPeerID = nc.nearID;
                txtFingerprint.text = myPeerID;
            private function initSendStream():void{
                trace("initSendStream");
                sendStream = new NetStream(nc,NetStream.DIRECT_CONNECTIONS);
                sendStream.addEventListener(NetStatusEvent.NET_STATUS, netStatusHandler);
                sendStream.publish("media");
                var sendStreamClient:Object = new Object();
                sendStreamClient.onPeerConnect = function(callerns:NetStream):Boolean{
                    farPeerID = callerns.farID;
                    trace("onPeerConnect "+farPeerID);
                    return true;
                sendStream.client = sendStreamClient;
            private function initRecvStream():void{
                recvStream = new NetStream(nc,farPeerID);
                recvStream.addEventListener(NetStatusEvent.NET_STATUS,netStatusHandler);
                recvStream.play("media");
                recvStream.client = this;
            public function receiveSomeData(str:String):void{
                txtReceiveData.text = str;
            private function sendSomeData():void{
                sendStream.send("receiveSomeData",txtSendData.text);
            private function netStatusHandler(event:NetStatusEvent):void{
                trace(event.info.code);
        ]]>
    </mx:Script>
    <mx:TextInput x="10" y="10" width="391" id="txtFingerprint"/>
    <mx:Button x="409" y="10" label="Connect" click="initConnection()"/>
    <mx:TextInput x="10" y="40" id="txtSendData"/>
    <mx:TextInput x="10" y="70" id="txtReceiveData" width="251"/>
    <mx:Button x="178" y="40" label="Send data" click="sendSomeData()"/>
    <mx:Button x="10" y="100" label="initSendStream" click="initSendStream()"/>
    <mx:Button x="132" y="100" label="initReceiveStream" click="initRecvStream();"/>
    <mx:Text x="10" y="130" text="Hint: First running Flash app - click Connect to get Fingerprint PeerID. Copy and paste this PeerID to second running Flash app to the same field and click Connect. Then initSendStream and initReceiveStream on both of them and finally you can write some text and click Send data." width="391" height="122"/>
</mx:Application>

Hmm, not sure I completely understand now. What exactly simultaneously should mean in this context? The thing is that it seems there's no chance in getting the connection to work when I first turn on the client on my Windows computer. The other way (starting on my Linux computer) it works just fine, and I am able to connect from my Windows to my Linux anytime.
Also I'm not sure that this is the problem, cause it seems that same problem apply to connection to other computers as well (however this impression is based on a testing with just a very few tries, so I'll try to test it more soon).
Thanks for the explaining anyway!

Similar Messages

  • ITunes (and Airfoil) can see Airport Express but can't connect in Windows XP (error -15000) - firewall problems?

    I am using Windows XP Professional 2002 w/ SP3 on a Dell Latitude E4300 laptop wirelessly connecting to my Airport Express 802.11n (firmware 7.5.2).
    I can see my Airport Express in iTunes 10.4.1 and can select it via the Airplay button. iTunes even detects whether or not a speaker is connected to the Airport Express. But when iTunes tries to connect, it comes back after a while saying "An error occurred while connecting to the Airplay device xxx. An unknown error occurred (error -15000)."
    A similar problem happens with Airfoil from Rogue Amoeba that I use to stream music from other apps such as VideoLAN to Airport Express on the same laptop. I can see that my Airport Express is available but when Airfoil tries to connect, it comes back saying "It appears that a firewall on this computer is preventing Airfoil from connecting to xxx Airport Express. Please check your firewall settings and try again."
    I've set both Airplay and iTunes as exception programs in my Windows Firewall setting, and even added TCP ports 5000 to 5005 and UDP ports 6000 to 6005 to the exceptions as recommended by Airfoil. I've also disabled Symantec Endpoint Protection that Ihave installed. The only thing I can't disable is McAfee Endpoint Encryption, since I also use the laptop at work and I don't have permission to disableMcAfee.  I use this laptop to connect wirelessly with other devices such as HP wireless printers, NAS drives and other laptops on my home network and have never had any issues, so i think that this issue is specific to the Airplay software being blocked by some firewall (I am assuming Airfoil also uses Airplay).
    I've tried this on different wireless networks and I have the same issue with Windows XP on my Dell Latitude E4300. I've also set up the network with no security, but the problem doesn't go away.
    I also tried downgrading iTunes to 10.3.1 but won't work. I think it's an Airplay issue, not a specific iTunes issue, since I'm facing the problem with Airfoil as well.
    How do I trace what is going on that is preventing iTunes and Airfoil from streaming to the AirportExpress within Windows XP?
    I also have another Dell Inspiron laptop on the same network running on Windows Vista, and have no problems streaming music from iTunes or Airfoil to the Airport Express on the same network, even when the network is WPA-2 Personal (TKIP+AES) protected (I've seen other postings where WPA has been an issue, WEP has not, but in my case, this is not an issue). Ditto with my iPad2.
    Thanks for your help!

    I have the same problem with Windows 7 64bit. ITune can see AE and stream Music well. Airfoil, TuneBlade (airplay soft) can also see AE but can't connect and stream music. I ' ve already tried to setup firewall Exception list, even turning off firewall off both windows and antivirus but still got the same problem with the message 'Airfoil was unable to connect to the remote speaker " ... 's Airport Express". Please check the firewall on the computer where " ...'s Airport Express" is running and try again'. Any help would be appreciated !.

  • Windows Xp Service Pack 2 Firewall Problem

    I'm trying to connect 9i Database. If the firewall option of Windows Xp Service Pack 2 is turned off, then it can connect. But if it is turned on, it can't connect. I tried to open port 1521 in settings but I think I can't succeed. How can I configure the firewall to connect database server?

    Hi, I've also had this problem and I found that the easiest way to resolve it is to go to control panel, Windows Firewall, Exceptions and Add Program. The programs that you need to add is oracle.exe and tnslsnr.exe(they should be in the bin directory of your ORACLE_HOME directory).
    Good luck
    Pavel

  • Problems with Windows Firewall and MSDTC on WSFC 2012R2

    We have a two node SQL 2014 Std WSFC configuration running on a W2012R2 cluster. The SQL WSFC Role includes an MSMQ resource that uses transactional queues.
    When setting up this configuration I was unable to get DTC working with SQL talking to MSMQ without clustering DTC and ended up clustering DTC in a separate role. It now works.
    However when SQL and DTC run on different nodes distributed transactions fails if Windows Firewall is enabled. I have configured the Windows Firewall to allow all DTC rules, both incoming and outgoing on both nodes but no go. If I turn off Windows Firewall
    it works.
    Assume it has to do with DTC running in the cluster context and the firewall not. Have googled quite a bit but can't find anything that feels related.
    Any ideas?

    Hi Fredrik,
    Please refer the follwoing article to confirm your firewall has configured correct first.
    How to troubleshoot MSDTC communication failure  (I)
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/asiatech/archive/2011/03/01/how-to-troubleshoot-msdtc-communication-failure-1.aspx
    How to troubleshoot MS DTC firewall issues
    https://support.microsoft.com/kb/306843?wa=wsignin1.0
    I’m glad to be of help to you!
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Problem (and resolution) with VI Server and Windows Firewall

    I have recently implemented a version of the "Rendezvous" VI's that work over the network using the VI Server.  Essentially, I wrote wrapper functions using "Call by Reference" for each of the  VI's in the  Rendezvous palate.  I have an isolated subnetwork that all the machine are on (i.e. no internet, no DNS).  The VI's work great on the local machine, or on networked machines when the Windows Firewall is turned off.  However, when the Windows Firewall is on for the CLIENT machine, I get an error trying to access the VI Server on the Server machine.  My understanding is that the windows firewall is inbound only?  Regardless, I entered "exceptions" for all possible ports that LabVIEW should be using as listed in:
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/2ED134294484FB4E86257212005951DA
    I'm running the VI Server on port 3362, so I also included that one.  I included the exceptions on both the client and the server machine.  I also made sure to include exceptions for the applications on both the client and the server machine.  None of that made any difference: with the windows firewall on the client machine, it could not connect to the server machine with the VI Server.
    Using the "netstat" command (windows xp). I was able to see that the host machine was trying to connect to the client machine on a port around 1044 (can't remember exactly).  With each instance that the client tried to connect to the host, the host would increment the port by 1.  i.e. 1044, 1045, 1046, etc....Just to test this out, I included and exceptions for three ports above 1046 on the client: 1047, 1048, 1049.  The client could connect for these instances, but once it got to 1050, it gave me the connection error again.  How in the world can you deal with this in the end application?  no firewall?
    Regardless, I found out another solution:  include entries for all the client machines in the "hosts" file on the server machine.
    This windows version of the "lmhosts" file resides at: [WINDOWS]\system32\drivers\etc
    The "lmhosts.sam" file contains documentation on entries in the "hosts" file.
    Incidentally, I also discovered that client entries in the "hosts" on the host machine drastically reduce timeouts associated with using the datasockets server on networks with no dedicated DNS.  (I believe datasockets tries to do a reverse lookup and has to time out, with the hosts entry the lookup executes immediately)
    Enjoy!

    I have no entries in the "hosts" file on the client side.  I only made entries to the "hosts" file on the server.  That's the weird part!  The client firewall blocks the connection unless the server has and entry for it in the "hosts" file! 
    I haven't really used the shared variable that much and haven't tried it.  If I had to speculate, I would guess that it may affect it similarly.  It did seem to have a positive effect in shortening the long duration timeouts that I was having with datasockets.

  • Firefox won't open/connect tp the internet. Explorer opens and connects. Windows firewall turned off. No other antivirus program running. Happened when I downloaded new Firefox update.

    Firefox won't open/connect tp the internet. Explorer opens and connects. Windows firewall turned off. No other antivirus program running. Happened when I downloaded new Firefox update.

    I had the same problem when i dl-ed a new anti-virus softward, but what I did help me reconnect Firefox again!
    Here is what I did,
    Go to open firefox browser-->option-->advanced-->network-->settings-->and change it to auto-detect proxy settings for this network!
    It worked for you, hope it will work for you too =)!
    Cheers

  • 0x8007000e (E_OUTOFMEMORY) while adding a firewall rule using the windows firewall COM API

    Hello,
    Configuration: Windows Embedded 8 64-bit.
    I'm using the Windows Firewall with Advanced Security COM API. The program uses the INetFwRules interface. Basically, I'm using the following code (Form the code sample available here : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd339604%28v=vs.85%29.aspx.)
     I get the error when performing "hr = pFwRules->Add(pFwRule);".
    We can also encounter the problem when removing a rule (using pFwRules->Remove(ruleName);)
    HRESULT hrComInit = S_OK;
    HRESULT hr = S_OK;
    INetFwPolicy2 *pNetFwPolicy2 = NULL;
    INetFwRules *pFwRules = NULL;
    INetFwRule *pFwRule = NULL;
    long CurrentProfilesBitMask = 0;
    BSTR bstrRuleName = SysAllocString(L"SERVICE_RULE");
    BSTR bstrRuleDescription = SysAllocString(L"Allow incoming network traffic to myservice");
    BSTR bstrRuleGroup = SysAllocString(L"Sample Rule Group");
    BSTR bstrRuleApplication = SysAllocString(L"%systemroot%\\system32\\myservice.exe");
    BSTR bstrRuleService = SysAllocString(L"myservicename");
    BSTR bstrRuleLPorts = SysAllocString(L"135");
    // Initialize COM.
    hrComInit = CoInitializeEx(
    0,
    COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED
    // Ignore RPC_E_CHANGED_MODE; this just means that COM has already been
    // initialized with a different mode. Since we don't care what the mode is,
    // we'll just use the existing mode.
    if (hrComInit != RPC_E_CHANGED_MODE)
    if (FAILED(hrComInit))
    printf("CoInitializeEx failed: 0x%08lx\n", hrComInit);
    goto Cleanup;
    // Retrieve INetFwPolicy2
    hr = WFCOMInitialize(&pNetFwPolicy2);
    if (FAILED(hr))
    goto Cleanup;
    // Retrieve INetFwRules
    hr = pNetFwPolicy2->get_Rules(&pFwRules);
    if (FAILED(hr))
    printf("get_Rules failed: 0x%08lx\n", hr);
    goto Cleanup;
    // Create a new Firewall Rule object.
    hr = CoCreateInstance(
    __uuidof(NetFwRule),
    NULL,
    CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER,
    __uuidof(INetFwRule),
    (void**)&pFwRule);
    if (FAILED(hr))
    printf("CoCreateInstance for Firewall Rule failed: 0x%08lx\n", hr);
    goto Cleanup;
    // Populate the Firewall Rule object
    pFwRule->put_Name(bstrRuleName);
    pFwRule->put_Description(bstrRuleDescription);
    pFwRule->put_ApplicationName(bstrRuleApplication);
    pFwRule->put_ServiceName(bstrRuleService);
    pFwRule->put_Protocol(NET_FW_IP_PROTOCOL_TCP);
    pFwRule->put_LocalPorts(bstrRuleLPorts);
    pFwRule->put_Grouping(bstrRuleGroup);
    pFwRule->put_Profiles(CurrentProfilesBitMask);
    pFwRule->put_Action(NET_FW_ACTION_ALLOW);
    pFwRule->put_Enabled(VARIANT_TRUE);
    // Add the Firewall Rule
    hr = pFwRules->Add(pFwRule);
    if (FAILED(hr))
    printf("Firewall Rule Add failed: 0x%08lx\n", hr);
    goto Cleanup;
    This works pretty well but, sometimes, at system startup, adding a rule ends up with the error 0x8007000e (E_OUTOFMEMORY) ! At startup, the system is always loaded cause several applications starts at the same time. But nothing abnormal. This is quite a random
    issue.
    According MSDN documentation, this error indicates that the system "failed to allocate the necessary memory".
    I'm not convinced that we ran out of memory.
    Has someone experienced such an issue? How to avoid this?
    Thank you in advance.
    Regards, -Ruben-

    Does Windows 8 desktop have the same issue? Are you building a custom WE8S image, or are you using a full WE8S image? The reason I ask is to make sure you have the modules in the image to support the operation.
    Is Windows Embedded 8.1 industry an option?
    www.annabooks.com / www.seanliming.com / Book Author - Pro Guide to WE8S, Pro Guide to WES 7, Pro Guide to POS for .NET

  • CUA: One or more errors occurred while checking the status of Windows Firewall on the cluster nodes

    Cluster with 2 hosts 2012 R2
    Scheduled CAU fails with:
    CAU run {4EFE116C-AB49-456D-8EED-F7EDC764DA49} on cluster Cluster1 failed. Error Message:One or more errors occurred while checking the status of Windows Firewall on the cluster nodes. Review the errors for more information on how to resolve the problems.
    Error Code:-2146233088 Stack:   at MS.Internal.ClusterAwareUpdating.Util.<CheckFirewallsAsync>d__3a.MoveNext()
    --- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task)
       at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
       at Microsoft.ClusterAwareUpdating.Commands.InvokeCauRunCommand.<_ProcessCluster>d__78.MoveNext()
    If I run CAU "Analyze Readiness" ALL comes as PASS
    If I run CUA by hand on same hosts with NO change to the system (not even reboot) it finishes OK
    Anybody any ideas?
    Thanks
    Seb

    Hi,
    In some case if you disabled the connection in Windows firewall inbound of
     "Cluster aware updating" service it will can’t use the CAU.
    More information:
    Starting with Cluster-Aware Updating: Self-Updating
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2012/05/17/starting-with-cluster-aware-updating-self-updating.aspx
    What is Cluster Aware Updating in Windows Server 2012? (Part 1)
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/mspfe/archive/2013/02/06/what-is-cluster-aware-updating-in-windows-server-2012.aspx
    Cluster-Aware Updating Overview
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831694.aspx
    Hope this helps.
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Windows Firewall doesn't work as advertised: "File and Sharing (SMB-in)" fails to restrict by user, computer or IP.

    Hello,
    I'm trying to understand whether I'm the one who's crazy, doing something wrong, or whether Windows Firewall was designed to be broken (and stay that way through Windows Server 2008 R2!)
    When I go to Windows Firewall with Advanced Security from the Start Menu and edit the Inbound Rule for "File and Sharing (SMB-in)", the result I am seeking is that I can restrict access by both user and computer.
    Upon enabling the rule, and selecting the "Allow the connection if it is secure" option (and nothing else), the firewall obliges by denying any and all attempts by other computers to map or browse files.
    When I enter the name of one PC in the Computers tab under the "Allow connections from these computers", again the firewall obliges and the said PC can now browse and map to shares on that server.  HOWEVER, now other computers on the network are able
    to do the same, as long as they have any set of verifiable credentials (like a local user/admin or domain user/admin, etc).  Trying to restrict by user or by IP yield almost identical results.  Both those who I do and do not want are able to access
    files on the said server.
    My question is this: how is this firewall rule supposed to work?  What do we have to do to actually make it accept and reject connections based on the criteria we have provided?
    My goal is to only allow SMB access to a user IF they log in from a particular computer or group of computers.
    Any help would be GREATLY appreciated!
    Waqqas

    I too find the same problem.  I enable the firewall rule, put in Local Addresses that I want to be able to get through the firewall to access the File shares, but it opens the firewall so any ip address can access the shares.  Anyone have an answer?
    And No, Niko Bellic,  checking the MSDN forum is NOT the answer!

  • Windows Firewall and Windows Update (Win 8.1)

    Since Windows Vista I have always been using the Windows Firewall with "blocked outgoing traffic". As this is not the default setting, some basic windows services seem not to be included as firewall rules on the outgoing side.
    My Problem is with the Windows Update:
    On Windows Vista and 7 it was sufficient to create a rule for "wuauserv".
    On Windows 8.1 however this seems not to be enough. The UI gives me error code 80240438 and the WindowsUpdate.log shows the following lines:
    2014-06-14    20:11:08:150     952    538    IdleTmr    WU operation (CAgentProtocolTalker::SyncUpdates_WithRecover) started; operation # 2044; does use network; is at background
    priority
    2014-06-14    20:11:08:151     952    538    WS    WARNING: Nws Failure: errorCode=0x803d0010
    2014-06-14    20:11:08:151     952    538    WS    WARNING: Original error code: 0x80072efd
    2014-06-14    20:11:08:151     952    538    WS    WARNING: Fehler bei der Kommunikation mit dem Endpunkt bei "https://fe2.update.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx".
    2014-06-14    20:11:08:151     952    538    WS    WARNING: Fehler beim Senden der HTTP-Anforderung.
    2014-06-14    20:11:08:151     952    538    WS    WARNING: Der Remoteendpunkt konnte nicht erreicht werden.
    (.... and a lot of similar WARNING lines)
    2014-06-14    20:11:12:921     952    538    IdleTmr    WU operation (CAgentProtocolTalker::SyncUpdates_WithRecover, operation # 2044) stopped; does use network; is at background
    priority
    If I create a rule for the whole svchost.exe, the update works fine. Giving all services internet access is however not an option for me. Could you please tell me through which service(s) except wuauserv Windows Update performs its network activities?

    Windows 8 upgraded to 8.1 on a Gateway SX2370.  Purchased Sep. 2013. 
    As of Dec. 28, 2014 I have not gotten ANY windows defender updates and windows update has not been working at all. When I go to my start screen and type "update" Windows update still shows in the list, only now when I click on it, it brings
    up a blank window and can only be closed by right clicking the tab on the taskbar. I cannot max or minimize the window either.
    Up until Dec. 28th it was working perfectly, notifying me when updates were available, almost everyday for windows defender.
    I have tried everything I could find to fix this, even a complete restore, with recovery media made for Win 8.1 and Win 8. Still no windows updates, of anything. To top it off as of Jan. 22, 2015 the Diagnostic Policy Service has stopped and I am denied
    access when I try restarting it.
    Windows XP was great until MS stopped support. Vista sucked, near as bad as Millenium or 2000. I never tried windows 7 instead going for windows 8, being the most recent version when I could afford a new PC. Adapting to win 8-8.1 was no easy task.
    I'm not a tech guru, but I've owned & used windows from Dos 6.0, '95, '98, '98SE, Millenium, XP, XP home & Pro (sp1-2 & 3) and still have the installation/restore CDs for all of them. Even taught myself how to write the recovery
    console directly from the hard drive of XP, OEM or full MS versions without using the CDs & now I'm using Windows 8 - 8.1. Getting rid of the recovery console was a BIG mistake in my opinion.
    At one time I had a multi-boot system of win.95, 98, 98SE, Mill., XP home sp2 and XP Pro sp3 on a 1.5 TB self built system. Microsoft told me it was impossible, until I allowed two tech support reps remote access for 5 min.. Which also lead to me being
    blocked from most MS websites &?suggestions windows forums for 3 years.
    But so far, this failure of windows updates and the Diagnostic policy Service in Windows 8.1 has got me stumped. Can ANYONE give me a quick simple way to correct this? Please?
    Thanks for reading this and any help or suggestions anyone has to offer. GOD bless you all and my thanks to every military person, their families and veterans for my freedom. 

  • Windows Firewall issue, Inbound rule opend all, still not the same as turning off

    This is Windows Firewall issue on Windows 8.1 Pro. 
    Backup Exec server cannot expand a computer node in selection list. I drill down to Microsoft Windows Network/Domain/Computers, then when I tried to expand a Windows 8.1 Pro computer node, it hangs out. 
    I narrowed this problem to Windows firewall related issue on Windows 8.1 Pro computer. 
    When I turn off Windows Firewall on Domain profile, Backup Exec Selection expands the computer node of the Windows 8.1 Pro computer. So, I created an inbound rule opening all to BAckup Exec server as following, but it's still not the same as turning off
    Windows firewall specifically on Windows 8.1 Pro computer;
    Any Local IP address, Any Remote IP address, Any port, Any protocol, All Interface, All Programs and Services, All profiles(Domain, Private, Public)
    And there are no rules blocking any which may override the above rule. 
    Ethernet on Windows 8.1 Pro computer shows profile is linked with Domain, but just to make it work, I selected all profiles.
    Even though I opened all available in inbound rule, it's still not the same as turning off windows firewall. Why am I missing? 

    It looks as something related to RPC(UDP 135), but even when inbound rule is all open, why it matters? RPC seems working fine only when firewall is turned off on domain profile. 
    Protocol 17 is UDP
    Port: 135
    ===============================
    Event ID 5152
    The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a packet.
    Application Information:
    Process ID:
    0
    Application Name:
    Network Information:
    Direction:
    Outbound
    Source Address:
    192.168.1.120
    Source Port:
    0
    Destination Address:
    192.168.1.11
    Destination Port:
    0
    Protocol:
    1
    Filter Information:
    Filter Run-Time ID:
    245836
    Layer Name:
    ICMP Error
    Layer Run-Time ID:
    32
    The Windows Filtering Platform has blocked a packet.
    Application Information:
    Process ID:
    0
    Application Name:
    Network Information:
    Direction:
    Inbound
    Source Address:
    192.168.1.11
    Source Port:
    35341
    Destination Address:
    192.168.1.120
    Destination Port:
    135
    Protocol:
    17
    Filter Information:
    Filter Run-Time ID:
    245834
    Layer Name:
    Transport
    Layer Run-Time ID:
    13

  • Windows firewall needs turned on to install in Windows 7-wireless install

    HP Photosmart Premium Fax e All in one printer c410A
    1. Lost abilty to connect with printer & Diagnostics say to reinstall. 
    2.  I am installing latest version, and have followed all steps meticulously but in order to install it says I have to have windows firewall on. (HP Software will not fix problem nor will windows software, and I can not tun on manually. )
    HP installation exits uninstalling as it goes.
    I have AVG antivirus installed & firewall is on there.
    Any ideas?

    Hello Tango2014, and welcome to the HP Forums, I hope you enjoy your experience!
    I see you are experiencing installation issues. I would like to help.
    I would suggest Uninstalling the Printer Software.
    Once it is uninstalled, I would suggest putting your system into clean boot mode within the Microsoft configuration.  You can do so by following this document: How to perform a clean boot in Windows.
    Once the computer is in clean boot mode, I would suggest reinstalling the HP Printer Install Wizard for Windows.
    Good luck and please let me know the results of your troubleshooting steps. Thank you for posting on the HP Forums!
    Please click “Accept as Solution " if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks" for helping!
    Jamieson
    I work on behalf of HP
    "Remember, I'm pulling for you, we're all in this together!" - Red Green.

  • TS1424 Itunes would not connect to the internet I put an exception in windows firewall, i tried running as an administrator but nothing works. What shall I do

    How can I resolve itunes not connecting to the itunes store? The diagnosis result is as follows
    Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise Edition Service Pack 1 (Build 7601)
    LENOVO 74695HG
    iTunes 11.0.1.12
    QuickTime 7.7.3
    FairPlay 2.2.32
    Apple Application Support 2.3.2
    iPod Updater Library 10.0d2
    CD Driver 2.2.3.0
    CD Driver DLL 2.1.3.1
    Apple Mobile Device 6.0.1.3
    Apple Mobile Device Driver 1.63.0.0
    Bonjour 3.0.0.10 (333.10)
    Gracenote SDK 1.9.6.502
    Gracenote MusicID 1.9.6.115
    Gracenote Submit 1.9.6.143
    Gracenote DSP 1.9.6.45
    iTunes Serial Number 00C0B9080B1E23C0
    Current user is not an administrator.
    The current local date and time is 2013-02-05 15:48:57.
    iTunes is not running in safe mode.
    WebKit accelerated compositing is enabled.
    HDCP is not supported.
    Core Media is supported.
    Video Display Information
    Intel Corporation, Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
    Intel Corporation, Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family
    **** External Plug-ins Information ****
    No external plug-ins installed.
    The drive F: WD Virtual CD 070A Rev 2018 is a USB 2 device.
    iPodService 11.0.1.12 is currently running.
    iTunesHelper 11.0.1.12 is currently running.
    Apple Mobile Device service 3.3.0.0 is currently running.
    **** Network Connectivity Tests ****
    Network Adapter Information
    Adapter Name:          {3ED4FAC2-2C54-479D-BB3C-907A69E63B06}
    Description:          Microsoft Virtual WiFi Miniport Adapter
    IP Address:          0.0.0.0
    Subnet Mask:          0.0.0.0
    Default Gateway:          0.0.0.0
    DHCP Enabled:          Yes
    DHCP Server:
    Lease Obtained:          Thu Jan 01 03:00:00 1970
    Lease Expires:          Thu Jan 01 03:00:00 1970
    DNS Servers:
    Adapter Name:          {85447654-69E9-4D0B-B1ED-8A0C3199B7EE}
    Description:          Bluetooth Device (Personal Area Network)
    IP Address:          0.0.0.0
    Subnet Mask:          0.0.0.0
    Default Gateway:          0.0.0.0
    DHCP Enabled:          Yes
    DHCP Server:
    Lease Obtained:          Thu Jan 01 03:00:00 1970
    Lease Expires:          Thu Jan 01 03:00:00 1970
    DNS Servers:
    Adapter Name:          {2FCD94FC-C6D4-460B-8CD0-7E2A49E59813}
    Description:          Intel(R) WiFi Link 5300 AGN
    IP Address:          192.168.100.113
    Subnet Mask:          255.255.255.0
    Default Gateway:          192.168.100.1
    DHCP Enabled:          Yes
    DHCP Server:          192.168.100.1
    Lease Obtained:          Tue Feb 05 14:51:11 2013
    Lease Expires:          Wed Feb 06 14:51:11 2013
    DNS Servers:          213.55.96.148
                        213.55.96.166
    Adapter Name:          {F5F04634-4C18-43C2-A969-40669C1874F8}
    Description:          Intel(R) 82567LM Gigabit Network Connection
    IP Address:          0.0.0.0
    Subnet Mask:          0.0.0.0
    Default Gateway:          10.16.85.1
    DHCP Enabled:          No
    DHCP Server:
    Lease Obtained:          Thu Jan 01 03:00:00 1970
    Lease Expires:          Thu Jan 01 03:00:00 1970
    DNS Servers:
    Active Connection:          LAN Connection
    Connected:          Yes
    Online:                    Yes
    Using Modem:          No
    Using LAN:          Yes
    Using Proxy:          No
    Firewall Information
    Windows Firewall is on.
    iTunes is enabled in Windows Firewall.
    Connection attempt to Apple web site was unsuccessful.
    The network connection timed out.
    Basic connection to the store failed.
    The network connection timed out.
    Connection attempt to Gracenote server was successful.
    The network connection timed out.
    Last successful iTunes Store access was 2012-03-02 12:24:56.
    Thank You for the support.

    I was having the same problem and the culprit was my web accelerator via Google Firefox. I have to turn of the accellerator before itunes will connect. Try that.
    Good luck.

  • Windows Firewall temp disabled when connecting to Linksys E2500

    About 3 months ago, I installed Linksys E2500 wireless router for my laptop Windows XP Pro. I have router firewall and Windows Firewall on.
    I notice that sometimes when I startup laptop, balloon pop up sand Windows Security Center saying Windows Firewall is off. After less than 2 seconds, it turns back on, disappearing the ballon.
    Also, if I right-click and press "repair" on the bottom right screen for my Wireless network connection, WHILE it is searching/connecting to network, then the balloon pop up will happen again.
    No events shown in logs.
    Avast Boot Scan, Malwarebytes, SuperAntiSpyware, Spybot, clean.
    What happening, I worried because this is my profession/work computer?

    Do you experience this problem on your other computers wired and wirelessly connected to your router? This might be a Windows XP OS issue and not with the E2500. Please try to make sure that the Firewall software that you installed are “turn on” from Action Center. And please try to make sure that your Anti-Virus software’s were updated and working properly on your computer.
    Please view this link as your reference:
    http://www.bitdefender.com/support/what-to-do-when-windows-security-center-reports-antivirus-antispy...

  • Error during the installation of Windows 8 Apps while having Windows Firewall disabled

    Hello,
    I have a question:
    I have Windows Firewall disabled in W8  and when  I try to install  APPs from the Windows Appstore  I obtain an error message saying something like:
    "The app couldn´t be installed because Windows Firewall service is not running. Enable Windows Firewall service and try again"
    I have the Firewall of Windows disabled because I already have another program for this purpose (monitoring/tracking my internet connections). So, that´s why I want to keep it disabled.
    Does anybody know if this problem is going to be fixed and in the next future we will be able to install W8 Apps with the Firewall of Windows disabled?
    Thanks in advance for the info.
    Regards.

    Hi,
    thanks to the steps of the webpage you have posted I´ve seen the code of the error in the log of my computer:
    error 0x80073D0A: when trying to install the package XXXXXXXX, the system couldn´t register the extension windows.repositoryExtension owing to the next error: The package couldn´t be installed because the service "Firewall of Windows" is
    not running. Enable the service "Firewall of Windows" and try again.
    It matches with one of the codes of your link.
    I think this question should be fixed. I (and I suppose much more people) already have a Firewall different than Microsofts´one and I want to have access to the Windows Store running only my "third-part firewall". Having two Firewalls running is a waste
    of resources.
    Regards.

  • Setting port exceptions for Windows Firewall via GPO. Is there a limit on the number of exceptions that can be set?

    We would like to utilize GPOs to manage our Windows Firewall rule set. We have servers that have different requirements (HL7 connections, other programs) and our doctrine is to only open ports that are going to be used.
    We need to be able to audit and enforce these standards, so GPOs seem to make the most sense to me.
    The problem I am running into is when I attempt to define multiple Windows Firewall Inbound Port Exceptions. (More than 10) After "Applying and Okaying" I will go to verify the firewall rule-set but I find that quite a few of them are missing. It
    seems like I am limited to 8-9 port exceptions per GPO.
    I am unable to locate any documentation about this, but we can work around this by creating multiple GPOs. 
    Has anyone run into this issue before?
    Domain Function level: Windows Server 2008
    Tho H. Le

    > Has anyone run into this issue before?
    No, unfortunately. Our main server FW exception GPO contains 44 rules
    with port or program exceptions, and it works flawlessly...
    Martin
    Mal ein
    GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
    NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
    Good or bad GPOs?
    And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

Maybe you are looking for