WLW and Integration BPMs

Hi,
I am trying to get a WLW webservice to communicate with a workflow I have created
in WLI BPM Studio using a JMS control.
I have an example of this based on a WL Platform 7sp1 domain that uses the following
config for the control:
send-jndi-name: com.bea.wli.bpm.EventQueue receive-jndi-name: com.bea.wli.bpm.EventReplyQueue
connection-factory: com.bea.wlpi.QueueConnectionFactory
I am now attempting to build a simliar example on a WL Platform 7sp2, but when
I come to select the receive-jndi-name there is no com.bea.wli.bpm.EventReplyQueue.
I am unsure about how to procede, can anyone give me some suggestions?
Regards Guy

Similar Messages

Need a solution for integration BPM and UCM 11.1.1.4?

Hi all,
Currently, I am using BPM & SOA 11.1.1.4.
Could somebody advise me a solution for integration BPM and UCM ?
I heard somebody said that need to wait to BPM 11G patch set 5 (11.1.1.6) version, which have basic BPM and UCM integration and haven't to using external API like RIDC or CIS.
Thanks & Regards.
Ming Nguyen.

Do not use prebuilt binaries, but compile the package from source with the current libudev.
sha256sums=(SKIP)
source=("$pkgname::git+https://github.com/rogerwang/node-webkit.git#tag=nw-v$pkgver")
to build it in the PKGBUILD, use nw-gyp i guess.
Last edited by progandy (2013-06-21 22:54:36)

Integrating BPM with WebCenter Content

To integrate UCM and BPM, I followed this tutorial written by J@n van Zoggel.
At the moment, I've already set up everything exactly as instructed in the tutorial. However, when I viewed a task in BPM Workspace, I still cannot see the Attachment section. In the log, I saw the following error:
Ensure that credential store map WF-ADMIN-USER with key WF-ADMIN-CREDENTIAL
contains UCM server admin username/password. Also ensure that Workflow configuration parameter
UcmIdcUrl contains IDC socket connection url to connect to UCM server and UCM server has permission
to let SOA server connect to it using IDC protocol.
access denied ("oracle.security.jps.service.credstore.CredentialAccessPermission" "context=SYSTEM,mapName=WF-ADMIN-USER,keyName=WF-ADMIN-CREDENTIAL" "read")]]
One thing I'd like to ask is that in all tutorials or articles I've read, the authors are always testing in the environment in which both the UCM and BPM servers are on the same machine. In my case, I am trying to connect my local BPM server with the online WebCenter Content server of my company, I wonder if I have to make any additional settings for this to work. A few pictures of my current settings are shown below.
I'd be very grateful if you could share with me your experience in integrating BPM and UCM.
Best regards,
James Tran
P/S: My environment is SOA Suite 11.1.1.7 and WebCenter 11.1.1.7
1. UcmIdcUrl setting:
2. WF-ADMIN-USER key map:
3. WebCenter Content IP Filter:

I don't believe that noone has ever tried to connect the local BPM environment to a remote WCC server before. Please let me know if you've ever experienced the same problem. Otherwise, even a simple "I tried to do the samething and I succeeded using the same steps in the tutorial" would help too .
Another thing is that yesterday, I talked to the tech-lead and I learned that our WCC server environment doesn't have BPM installed yet. I am wondering if this would cause the WCC server to not understand the request from my BPM server. In addtion, I've also upgraded my local BPM server using the lastest SOA bundled patch. Should the same patch be applied to the WCC server environment too?
I'd be very grateful for any advice .

Legacy Integration - BPM suite or SOA suite?

We have an existing legacy transaction engine, all dedicated CICS, including security (ransactions, exits, etc.). Looking to externalize and consolidate some of the business logic away from it. Databases are Oracle and DB2 on the host. Not more then five instances total.
Definitely using WebLogic, not WAS, not JBoss. Hiring and training support team starting next month. Number of processes to be consolidated/transitioned is less then 40 total. Would you recommend BPM Suite or SOA suite with BPEL PM? Any benefits of one vs the other? We do have some BPM (AL) studio experience.
Thanks in advance.

Someone from Oracle should step in on this thread when they get a chance to provide greater depth on the BPEL side and the strategic direction on both Oracle BPM and BPEL.
If you have Oracle Suite, you get Oracle Service Bus (OSB) which provides a platform that both BPEL and Oracle BPM can consume from. If you purchase Oracle BPM Suite, you get licenses for both Oracle BPM and BPEL and Oracle BPM processes can consume BPEL processes and vice versa. If you look at Oracle's plans for Oracle BPM 11g coming out sometime in the next 10 months, it appears to be a coexistance strategy leveraging the strengths of both Oracle BPM and BPEL.
My initial reaction was to say that it's not an "either/or" scenario, but the realities of training budgets and skill sets pretty much dictate that you need to focus on one or the other.
I've been doing Oracle BPM work for several years so recognize that although I am not biased, it might appear so in this thread. If you hit the BPEL forum, you'll get feedback from enthusiastic proponents of BPEL. Although I'd like to be, I'm not an expert on BPEL, but here's my take on your question.
Modeling
Oracle BPM was built with one process modeling diagram. It is simple, BPMN based and quick to learn. It supports the roles and the activities I need to build robust processes. As I hinted at in an earlier thread, I use the same diagram to explain the process to executives, managers, IT, SME and business analysts. As a business analyst, the tool is not complicated and can be learned in just a couple hours. As a developer, I use the same modeling diagram, but the tool profile I use is a robust IDE that lets me create the implementation details (objects, logic, integration to services and local testing). If I make a change as a developer, the business analyst can see the change if they look at the same process artifact (typically shared through a source control repository).
BPEL models are very useful for IT. Most times IT does not care or need to know about the roles / swimlanes and the BPEL tool does a nice job of not providing these extra artifacts. When the model has to be shown to non-technical executives, managers, SMEs and business analysts, it is typically shown in BPA. There is a round tripping interface between BPA and BPEL that the folks at Oracle can show you. Others may disagree, but I think there is a bit of a learning curve with BPA for business analysts. It has many different types of diagrams that let you see the different levels of decomposition and abstraction.
Logic
As a developer using Oracle BPM, I use templates and drag and drop to create much of my logic. Once I catalog an object it can be reused across multiple projects either by using the Project Dependency option or by importing the artifacts. I test my logic either by using the method editor debugger or at the process level.
As I create objects used in my logic using Oracle BPM, I can easily inherit attributes provided by introspected components. This means that if you have an ERP system with 138 attributes, you do not have to rebuild this object from scratch in Oracle BPM.
Probably one of BPEL's strengths is that there is not much coding inside the tool. Instead the logic mostly resides in the invoked components.
UI
End user interface screens and complex end user interaction with a variety of screens can be built inside the Oracle BPM toolset's WYSIWYG editor. The forms use the attributes of the objects described in the previous paragraph. There's a common misconception that you cannot have both client side and server side components invoked from the UI. This is simply not the case. You can use both client side and server side components to do cross field validation or provide lists for valid values.
If you're a JSP shop, you have the flexibility to instead create your forms using the Oracle BPM tag library instead of the forms editor provided.
The forms you build are automatically presented in the OOTB Workspace.
I believe BPEL uses ADF as the forms builder interface. Others on this forum or folks on the BPEL forum are far more knowledgeable on ADF than I am and can give you the comparison between UI builders.
Runtime
Oracle BPM can be installed on WebLogic. There is a common misunderstanding that Oracle BPM cannot be clustered. This is also not the case. The engine was first ported to WebLogic about 4 years ago and clustering is supported.
Integration
As I mentioned in the earlier thread, both tools can provide the integration you're looking for. Both Oracle BPM and BPEL can use OSB as the intermediary layer. Oracle BPM can expose and consume component directly if you do not have OSB.
Finally, Oracle BPM was built and architected as one complete solution with modeling, development, runtime, end user worklist and BAM capabilities built into it from the beginning 10 years ago. This integration makes the process modeling tool simple for both IT and business analysts to easily communicate using the same modeling syntax. Similarly, integration across the different parts of the product makes it easy to expose the components directly inside Oracle BPM's catalog (again - since you have SOA Suite, instead use OSB so you enable your SOA architecture). Even the end user interface (the Workspace) that exposes users' inboxes and displays the forms is OOTB and automatcally built for you by the tool.
Hope this helps,
Dan

Difference between Workflow and Integration Process

Hi Experts,
Can someone please explain, what is the difference between the workflow and integration process(BPM).
Thanks
Sree

Hi Sree,
Integration Processes are :-
--Message based
--Interface focused
--Cross component
--Have no support for human interaction
--Enabled with SAP XI
Workflows are:-
--Object based
--Human focused
--Intra-application
--Have no support for mapping, routing or message transformations
--Enabled with the SAP Web AS
However, most automated business processes involve a combination of the two.
I hope this clear your doubt.
Regards.
Praveen

Unit testing and integration testing

hello 2 all,
what is the diff bet unit and integration testing? in sap what is unit teesting consists of and integration testing consists of what?
is this the work of test engineers r whose work is this?
take care
love ur parents

Hi Sameer,
Unit Testing
A unit test is a procedure used to validate that a particular module of source code is working properly from each modification to the next. The procedure is to write test cases for all functions and methods so that whenever a change causes a regression, it can be quickly identified and fixed. Ideally, each test case is
separate from the others; constructs such as mock objects can assist in separating unit tests. This type of testing is mostly done by the developers and not by end-users.
Integration testing
Integration testing can proceed in a number of different ways, which can be broadly characterized as top down or bottom up. In top down integration testing the high level control routines are tested first, possibly with the middle level control structures present only as stubs. Subprogram stubs were presented in Section 2 as incomplete subprograms which are only present to allow the higher level control routines to be tested. Thus a menu driven program may have the major menu options initially only present as stubs, which merely announce that they have been successfully called, in order to allow the high level menu driver to be tested.
Top down testing can proceed in a depth-first or a breadth-first manner. For depth-first integration each module is tested in increasing detail, replacing more and more levels of detail with actual code rather than stubs. Alternatively breadth-first would proceed by refining all the modules at the same level of control
throughout the application. In practice a combination of the two techniques would be used. At the initial stages all the modules might be only partly functional, possibly being implemented only to deal with non-erroneous data. These would be tested in breadth-first manner, but over a period of time each would be
replaced with successive refinements which were closer to the full functionality. This allows depth-first testing of a module to be performed simultaneously with breadth-first testing of all the modules.The other major category of integration testing is bottom up integration testing where an individual module is
tested from a test harness. Once a set of individual modules have been tested they are then combined into a collection of modules, known as builds, which are then tested by a second test harness. This process can continue until the build consists of the entire application.
In practice a combination of top-down and bottom-up testing would be used. In a large software project being developed by a number of sub-teams, or a smaller project where different modules were being built by individuals. The sub-teams or individuals would conduct bottom-up testing of the modules which they were
constructing before releasing them to an integration team which would assemble them together for top-down testing.
I think this will help.
Thanks ,
Saptarshi

Unit Testing and Integrating testing In HR

Dear Sap Gurus,
Would you be kind enough to give me an example of unit testing and integrating testing?? what do you test, eg..TC and what else.. what happened.??. And also an example of Integrating testing ..and an example ....I know what unit and integrating test is ..and with a good example, i will have a great idea about it ...thanks a lot.

Hi Pooja
Unit Testing:
A process for verifying that software, a system, or a system component performs its intended functions.
Unit transactions are tested against their own specifications and design documents.
Integration Testing
An orderly progression of testing in which software elements, hardware elements or both are combined and tested until the entire system has been integrated.
Integration tests deal mainly with the testing of cross-application process chains in addition to transactions and business processes. The process models and the test cases derived from these form the basis of these tests.
Regards
Vijay

V I Engineering, Inc has immediate needs for Systems Engineers (Contract) and Senior Systems Engineers (Contract) (reporting to the Test Software and Integration Group Manager)

Company: V I Engineering, Inc.
Locations: Various - USA
Salary/Wage: $negotiable
Status: Hourly Contractor
Relevant Work Experience: 5+ years system integration (LabVIEW/TestStand experience required)
Career Level: Intermediate/Experienced
Education Level: Bachelor's Degree
Residency/Citizenship: USA Citizenship or Greencard required
Driving Business Results through Test Engineering
V I Engineering, Inc. has a vision for every client we engage. That vision is to achieve on-time and on-budget program launch more efficiently that the competition. To realize this vision, customers need to achieve predictable test systems development, eliminate waste in test information management, and drive increased leverage of test assets. An underlying requirement for all of these areas is metrics tracking and measurement based decision making.
Job Description
Ready to make a difference? Bring your experiences and skills to the industry leading test organization. Help us to continue to shape the way the world views test. We are seeking a talented Systems Engineer Contractor to be responsible for technical execution of successful projects in the Medical, Military, Transportation, Consumer Electronics and Aerospace Industries. The position will have very high visibility to customers and vendors. This is a very fast paced team with close customer contact and strong career development opportunities. A large part of the position is to identify, own and drive technical design, development and installation of test systems. You will work alongside other like-minded and equally talented engineers, and be creative in a fast-paced and flexible environment that encourages you to think outside the box. You will be available to spend extended periods at our customer sites to complete system installations.
Required
5+ years of Systems Integration experience
3+ years LabVIEW experience
1+ years TestStand experience
Experience in Implementation and Delivery of Test Systems, including integration
Experience in ATE usage and development
Experience in building and Integrating Mechanical Fixtures
Experience in Understanding the design of Circuit Boards as they relate to a total system, and their fault-finding
Experience in Taking Part in Technical Teams throughout All Phases of Project Lifecycle
Experience in Interfacing with Sub-vendors and Customers
Ability to Multitask
Comfortable Working on Various Team Sizes
Excellent Communication Skills
Desired
Requirements generation and review experience
National Instruments Hardware knowledge
Experience with Source Code Control (SCC)
Experience executing verification and validation for projects
Experience generating and/or reviewing cost proposals
RF Technology (DAQ, General RF Theory)
FPGA (with LabVIEW)
Professional software engineering processes and metrics experience
TortoiseSVN
V I Package Manager (VIPM)
Experience with Projects for Regulated Industries
MS Project
Formal Education
Technical degree (BS Engineering, Computer Science, Physics, Math)
National Instruments Courses a plus
National Instruments certification a plus
Notes:
Expected Travel Time is up to 50%.
V I Engineering, Inc. offers a dynamic work environment and the flexibility of a small company.
The Test Software and Integration Group values innovation, out-of-the-box thinking, high-tech toys and a fun / amazingly collaborative working environment. We're a National Instruments Select Integrator, and we're the closest you can get to playing with all the pre-released and new NI toys without joining the NI R&D team - and we get to play with them in the real world.
To apply for this position, email a cover letter and resume to [email protected] with the subject "TSIG Systems Engineer (Contract) employment application".
Copyright © 2004-2015 Christopher G. Relf. Some Rights Reserved. This posting is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Edit
Jeff

V I Engineering, Inc has immediate needs for Systems Engineers and Senior Systems Engineers (reporting to the Test Software and Integration Group Manager)

Company: V I Engineering, Inc.
Locations: Positions available in our Farmington Hills, MI Office
Salary/Wage: $negotiable
Status: Full Time, Employee
Relevant Work Experience: 5+ years system integration (LabVIEW/TestStand experience preferred, but not required)
Career Level: Intermediate (Non-Manager)
Education Level: Bachelor's Degree
Residency/Citizenship: USA Citizenship or Greencard required
Driving Business Results through Test Engineering
V I Engineering, Inc. has a vision for every client we engage. That vision is to achieve on-time and on-budget program launch more efficiently that the competition. To realize this vision, customers need to achieve predictable test systems development, eliminate waste in test information management, and drive increased leverage of test assets. An underlying requirement for all of these areas is metrics tracking and measurement based decision making.
Job Description
Ready to make a difference? Bring your experiences and skills to the industry leading test organization. Help us to continue to shape the way the world views test. We are seeking a talented Systems Engineer to be responsible for technical execution of successful projects in the Medical, Military, Transportation, Consumer Electronics and Aerospace Industries. The position will have high visibility to customers and vendors. This is a very fast paced team with close customer contact and strong career development opportunities. A large part of the position is to identify, own and drive technical design and development of test systems. You will work alongside other like-minded and equally talented engineers, and be creative in a fast-paced and flexible environment that encourages you to think outside the box.
Required
5+ years of Systems Integration experience
Experience in Design and Implementation of Test Systems, including integration
Experience in ATE usage and development
Experience in reviewing of Mechanical Fixtures
Experience in understanding the design of Circuit Boards as they relate to a total system
Experience in Taking Part in Technical Teams throughout All Phases of Project Lifecycle
Experience in Interfacing with Sub-vendors and Customers
Ability to Multitask
Comfortable Working on Various Team Sizes
Excellent Communication Skills
Desired
Requirements generation and review experience
National Instruments Hardware knowledge
LabVIEW/TestStand experience
Experience with Source Code Control (SCC)
Experience executing verification and validation for projects
Experience generating and/or reviewing cost proposals
RF Technology (DAQ, General RF Theory)
FPGA (with LabVIEW)
Professional software engineering processes and metrics experience (statement coverage, code size, reuse measurement, etc)
TortoiseSVN
V I Package Manager (VIPM)
UML
Experience with Projects for Regulated Industries
MS Project
Formal Education
Technical degree (BS Engineering, Computer Science, Physics, Math)
National Instruments Courses a plus
National Instruments certification a plus
Notes:
Expected Travel Time is up to 25%Re
location assistance is possible.
V I Engineering, Inc. offers incredible opportunities to grow and advance your career, a dynamic work environment and the flexibility of a small company.
The Test Software and Integration Group values innovation, out-of-the-box thinking, high-tech toys and a fun / amazingly collaborative working environment. We're a National Instruments Select Integrator, and we're the closest you can get to playing with all the pre-released and new NI toys without joining the NI R&D team - and we get to play with them in the real world.
To apply for this position, email a cover letter and resume to [email protected] with the subject "TSIG Systems Engineer employment application".
Copyright © 2004-2015 Christopher G. Relf. Some Rights Reserved. This posting is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

Edit
Jeff

Difference between unit testing and integration testing

What is the difference between unit testing and integration testing in SAP? Is unit testing takes place in Dev client and integration testing takes place in QA system?
Please clarify
thanks

Hello Krishen,
unit testing means veryfiingsmall / the smallet pieces of software, while integration testing checks the overall functionality of applications. Within the AS ABAP the tool ECATT + manual tests is used for integration tests and the ABAP Unit language integration for unit testing.
When, Who, Where tests are carried out is ultimately a personal decision. As unit tests are operate even under heavy development they are often the first choice for developers, but the unit tests can also serve for regression tests over a long period. Integration tests tend too be created and executed in later stages as they require often a certain majurity of the software under test.
Beside the mentioned links you may check out ABAP Unit infos also in the Wiki.
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/ABAP+Unit
Best Regards
Klaus

Database connection encryption and integrity with ColdFusion and Oracle thin client

As ColdFusion datasource we are using the Oracle thin client to connect with the database. So, basically we are using a JDBC URL such as jdbc:oracle:thin:@... and as Driver Class oracle.jdbc.OracleDriver. This works successfully however we would like to set encryption and integrity parameters as well. In Java this is done similarly by setting a Properties object prior to getting a connection as follows:
Properties prop = new Properties();
prop.put("oracle.net.encryption_client", "REQUIRED");
prop.put("oracle.net.encryption_types_client", "( DES40 )");
prop.put("oracle.net.crypto_checksum_client", "REQUESTED");
prop.put("oracle.net.crypto_checksum_types_client", "( MD5 )");
OracleDataSource ods = new OracleDataSource();
ods.setProperties(prop);
ods.setURL("jdbc:oracle:thin:@localhost:1521:main");
Connection conn = ods.getConnection();
Is there a way that I can pass these parameters to the ColdFusion datasource. Ideally, I would love to do this centrally in such way that a change to all the cfquery or cfstoredproc is not needed.
I also know that in application servers such as Oracle AS there is an option when creating a datasource which says "Add Properties". In there you can add such properties. So, I was thinking of maybe creating a JNDI DS in the app. server and then magically connecting to it but this may have some impacts on the app.
Besides this I was also thinking of communicating with the CF datasource through the CF admin API (cfide.adminapi.administrator) and also the option of extending the Oracle driver so that when CF connects with it these params are already set.
I would love to have your professional opinion and suggestions on this.

I believe the thin driver actually needs the IP address (not the DNS name). Also, is "java" the name of the Oracle instance to which you are trying to connect?
Try the following:String driver = "jdbc:oracle:thin";
String dbIP = "W2RZ1NXG01's IP address";
String dbPort = "1530";
String dbSid = "java";
String dbUser = "Admin";
String dbPswd = "apassword";
String cnctStr = driver + ":@" + dbIP + ":" + port + ":" + dbSid;
try
    Class.forName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver");
    con = DriverManager.getConnection( cnctStr, dbUser, dbPswd );
    stmt = con.createStatement();
    stmt.executeUpdate(createString);
    stmt.close();
    con.close();
catch(SQLException ex)
    System.err.println( "The following SQLException occurred: " + ex );
    System.err.println( "Message: " + ex.getMessage() );

As a stockholder, I would like see the development of iTV with Retina display and integrating Siri control, internet access, and iTunes apps. This new product would be a large screen, thin wall mounted television, much like a oversided iPad.

As a stockholder, I would like see the development of iTV with Retina display and integrating Siri control, internet access, and iTunes apps. This new product would be a large screen, thin wall mounted television, much like a oversided iPad.
Do you think this product is possible?

In general theory, one now has the Edit button for their posts, until someone/anyone Replies to it. I've had Edit available for weeks, as opposed to the old forum's ~ 30 mins.
That, however, is in theory. I've posted, and immediately seen something that needed editing, only to find NO Replies, yet the Edit button is no longer available, only seconds later. Still, in that same thread, I'd have the Edit button from older posts, to which there had also been no Replies even after several days/weeks. Found one that had to be over a month old, and Edit was still there.
Do not know the why/how of this behavior. At first, I thought that maybe there WAS a Reply, that "ate" my Edit button, but had not Refreshed on my screen. Refresh still showed no Replies, just no Edit either. In those cases, I just Reply and mention the [Edit].
Also, it seems that the buttons get very scrambled at times, and Refresh does not always clear that up. I end up clicking where I "think" the right button should be and hope for the best. Seems that when the buttons do bunch up they can appear at random around the page, often three atop one another, and maybe one way the heck out in left-field.
While I'm on a role, it would be nice to be able to switch between Flattened and Threaded Views on the fly. Each has a use, and having to go to Options and then come back down to the thread is a very slow process. Jive is probably incapable of this, but I can dream.
Hunt

E-Recruiting - active on both central ECC + Standalone box and integrated?

Hi,
Can someone tell me if the following landscape is possible with E-rec? (we are installing ehp4)
a) Our central ECC system with the E-Rec component activated. Used for internal recruiting.
+
b) A standalone E-Rec box , connected and integrated via ALE to the above central ECC system. Used for external recruiting.
So we now have have E-rec activated on both systems with the standalone one integrated into the ECC6 one where E-rec is also active.
Will we have all the functionality of E-Rec/Talent Mangement availalble in this landscape? Will the manager via the Recruiter business packages and MSS be able to use all functionality seemlesly with all data merged between the systems? Do you think all BI reporting on E-rec will work as it suppose to?
We want to be able to integrate and use the data from both systems as a single unit with standard SAP functionality. We only want to physically seperate where the external and where the internal users log on to.
Thanks

Hello,
My suggestion to you would be to have the ECC server upgraded to EHP4, activate E-Recruiting and have it inside the firewall as the back-end server. Recruiters and Managers accessing through portal will access this system. You will have the other server as the front-end server with E-Recruiting. Candidates will update their information in this front-end server, which will in turn update the back-end server through an RFC. This can be achieved through configuration if you check in SPRO.
There is no such thing as external recruiting or internal recruiting to some extend. What you have is external and internal candidates in the same talent pool. It is when you post to candidates where you can select whether you want internal candidates only to apply or external candidates. The external will not see internal postings and vice-versa when they search for jobs. External candidates will login from the internet while internal candidates will login from the portal. Your candidate's information will be residing in both systems but the backend will be updated through an RFC.
In this case the BI will work as normal. I hope this will help you - but this is my opnion.
Best Regards,

Differences between Oracle BPM and Aqualogic BPM 6.0

Hello,
Does anyone know where I can find information that spells out the differences between Aqualogic 6.0 and Oracle BPM (if there are any)? I've searched the Oracle sites, documentation sections, etc. and I cannot find a datasheet that spells out anything related to the differences between the two aside from the name change.
Thank you.

I thought that there no major differences between the versions, only changes in the skin, logo and an improvement in the engine, but I was wrong.
My production enviroment runs BPM Enterprise in version 6, in other words runs Aqualogic BPM Enterprise, not Oracle BPM Enterprise, but in the development enviroment I made the decision to use the version 10 (Oracle BPM Studio 10g), because I thought there were no considerable changes between versions.
So I could not make the deployment of the project in the enterprise version, the log reported that many processes and screenflows of the project were not found, then I tried to open the project that was done in version 10 in version 6 of the BPM Studio and then try to export the ".exp" to try to do the deployment again. When I opened the project in BPM Studio 6 some errors occurred, but no significant errors. I fixed the errors, export the project again and try to do the deployment in the enterprise version and the same problems as before still occurring.
The only solution I found was to make the project in BPM Studio 6.04 (Aqualogic). Now I can make the deployment of the project in the production environment.
Conclusion: always use the same version in BPM studio/enterprise. If you use Oracle BPM Studio in development enviroment, use Oracle BPM Enterprise for production enviroment. The same way if you use Aqualogic BPM Studio in development enviroment, use Aqualogic BPM Enterprise in the production enviroment.

How to use Standard POD and Integrated POD at same VMfg session

Hi,
how POD's have to configure so that you can use Standard POD and Integrated POD at same VMfg session. we have problem that if I login to VMfg and open default integrated POD, this POD opened in normal way. But, after that if you open default Standard POD (workstation ), it will not opened. VMfg gives error 'The POD "" type of I does not exist. (Message 15924)'
Same problem when you login to VMfg and open Standard POD: POD open normally. After that open Integrated POD: this POD open normally. But when open Standard POD again, an error exists 'The POD "*" type of I does not exist. (Message 15924)'
Regards,
- Jukka

Hi,
you are right, when &WORKSTATION_TYPE=S is configured for standard POD and &WORKSTATION_TYPE=I for integrated POD, both PODs can be used in same session.
Also I noticed that if &WORKSTATION_TYPE=S is not configured for Standard POD, in first time when I open this POD, I got error. But when I reopen same Standard POD, it will open normally without errors. Why it works so?
- Jukka

WLW and Integration BPMs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for