WM Implementation for my company

My company is using SAP, but for now just use IM inventory management.
My director want to deploy WMS module for manage warehouse.
Can any one pls enlighten me, do I have to buy more servers? Material plan in WM ?
Thanks...

Hi Harry,
If you are looking to implement ECC WM then additional cost is not required other then user license as WM functionality is readily available. if you are looking to implement SCM EWM (which is having all the latest functionality, in another word future of Warehouse management) then yes you need to go for new server and other addon cost.
ECC WM -- Integreated with ECC no additional cost is required other then user license
Decentralized WM -Separate server is required, user license
SCM EWM --Future of WM with all the latest functionality, Separate server user license

Similar Messages

  • SAP Implementation for Cement company.

    Hi Gurus,
    I want your help. I have been given an opportunity to implement SAP for Cement company.
    Being a basis consultant how should i go about it. I have support exp but  this is my first implementation so i m bit nervous.
    Please help me how to start the process...
    Regards
    Abhishek

    First thing you have to check with what kind of system going to install. I mean its DEMO(IDES) or permanent system
    Are you encouraging IDES installations for customer use?
    its an easy thing. u can do it very easily
    Please do not motivate anybody in their way....this may caused to financial loss to customer as well as the vendor
    Regards
    Nick Loy

  • Can more than 1 full life cycle implementations be done for a company?

    Hi there,
    Can anybody please tell me if its possible to do more than 1 full life cycle implementation for a company with multiple company codes? From my understanding, SAP life cycle is ASAP methodology, starting from project preparation to go-live. So if I'm implementing sap for 1 company code, I'll be completing 1 full life cycle implementaion. Now if i do the same for another company code, for the same parent company, will that be considered as 2 full life cycle implementation? Kindly help. I'm not so clear about this full life cycle implementation concept.
    Would really appreciate your gekp.
    Awaiting response,
    Fieona

    HI,
             Well I think It is possible but there are two cases.
    If the implementation is in some company code having same business as the company in which initially SAP was implemented and all the business processed are same then in that case it would be called Rollout. In rollout you would only create the Organizational data that is enter prise structure and master data for that company but there will be no new process configuration as all the running process are already there.
    How ever if you talk about the group lets say has two three completely different business for ex AUto mobile and Power and you implemented it initially in Automobile. Now you want to implement in Power generation sector then definately it would be a fresh implementation. In this case the most important is that you will prepare new BBP as all the business process are different. A complete new documentations, new master data , org elements and a different realization phase and testing phase would be there.
    Please correct If I am wrong.

  • Solution for Courier Company

    Hi All
    Can the Business One be implemented for a company which is involved in courier business
    Regards
    Louis

    Hi,
    Yes, it is possible but could you specify the exact requirements of the Courier company. We already have some partners who have created some solutions for integerating B1 with some of the Courier companies like Fedex, UPS and DHL etc.
    Please have a look at the following thread for further details about the same :
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/businessone-forums
    Regards
    Arshdeep

  • SAP Implementation for a building construction company

    Dear All ,
                   We are doing SAP implementation for a building construction Company .My client is responsible for building construction .What they do is initially some 10 members of this Company will create a society(Legal Entity)  .They are like promoters for company . They will put advertisement for buying of flats belonging to that society . Then some 20 members (outside) join this society by registering who are actual buyers of the Flats which society builds .
                   Then this society passes a resolution that my client will be the building contractor for flats . After that these 20 outside members will pay the full amount . After this Flats were built then these members will occupy flat ,then after some 4 -5 years of maintenance these 10 core members of society will hand over the society completely to secondary members and come out of the society .
                    Now how we will map this society in SAP  .One society can have more than one project going on . Somebody is suggesting to treat a society as a company code . But we have more than 250 societies . Is it viable . Shall we create plant for each project .
    Regards
    Abhijit Das

    Hi Abhijit,
    Suggestion by our PS consultant for your requirement is
    >>>I would suggest that in case of PS, consider society as Business area and each building as one Project and under project WBS and if any activities floor wise consider as networks.
    Oust side membersu2019 Account payables and receivables and downpayments will come under FICO.
    Regards,
    Uzair

  • SAP Implementation for a Real Estate Company

    Dear All ,
                 We are doing SAP implementation for a building construction Company .My client is responsible for building construction .What they do is initially some 10 members of this Company will create a society(Legal Entity) .They are like promoters for company . They will put advertisement for buying of flats belonging to that society . Then some 20 members (outside) join this society by registering who are actual buyers of the Flats which society builds .
                Then this society passes a resolution that my client will be the building contractor for flats . After that these 20 outside members will pay the full amount . After this Flats were built then these members will occupy flat ,then after some 4 -5 years of maintenance these 10 core members of society will hand over the society completely to secondary members and come out of the society .
    Now how we will map this society in SAP .One society can have more than one project going on . Somebody is suggesting to treat a society as a company code . But we have more than 250 societies . Is it viable . Shall we create plant for each project .
    Suggestions From SDN :I would suggest that in case of PS, consider society as Business area and each building as one Project and under project WBS and if any activities floor wise consider as networks
    Any Other Suggestions ?????
    Abhijit

    Hi,
    If you are using PS , then this is good approach.
    Also have a look at SAP Real Estate Management.
    http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/realestate/index.epx
    Regards,

  • Which module to implement for a small education company

    Hi all,
    Which Modules of oracle are to be implemented for a small educational company of manpower 100-400?
    thanks n regards
    ramki

    You're right Fubals, WebApps are the best course of action to explore.
    I found this rather splendid article on what I'm trying to achieve in the BC Online Help:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/business-catalyst/partner/web-apps-module-create-custom.html
    I hope that it comes in handy for other BC newbies who are looking to create the same functionality as I am.

  • Entry Channel setup for multiple company codes

    Hello,
    I have a question regarding the entry channel setup (for external requirements in the Plan-Driven Procurement scenario)
    In previous implementations, I 've created an entry channel below each company code (as the documentation says it should be). Now, for each entry channel, there was a EBP user assigned, which corresponded to an RFC entry in the backend system (I was connecting EBP to multiple backend systems)
    Now, what should I do in the following scenario?:
    1. SRM is only connected to one backend system
    2. There are 50 company codes
    Does that mean I have to create 50 users (for each channel) plus 50 RFC connections in the R/3 system (each with a different user in the backend system), pointing to the same SRM system?
    I was thinking of creating an Org iD in the SRM structure at the top (which would be the entry channel), assign only ONE user to it and then fill attribute BUK with all the company codes. However, I don't know if this will work, because the external requirement process might need the company code defined in the "Function" tab... =/
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Gilberto.

    Hi Proyecto Genesis,
    I am also configuring the Entry channel (org unit) for multiple company codes.
    I tried your logic of defining the entry channel outside company code level. Assigned the BUK attribute and extended attribute for plants and storage locations.
    Also in my case the local Pur org and Pur group is defined outside the company code. Is it correct?
    However the system fails to transfer the external requisition to SRM.
    SLG1 displays following error message.
    "No address found for partner function type Ship-To Address"
    So if I move the Entry channel (org unit) under any one company code level then the external requisitions are transferred correctly to SRM.
    But then the issue is the requirements are not transferred with the backend Pur Org and Pur grp. Instead they are transferred to the Pur Org and Pur grp of the company code under which the entry channel is defined.
    Can you please share how do we need to define the entry channel, local pur org and pur grp for multiple company codes scenario, so that the ECC requisitions are transferred with the correct company code, pur org and pur grp to SRM?
    Or do we need to define Entry channel for each company code and RFC user actually mapping the same backend system?
    Please guide.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

  • CUA : To implement or not to Implement for Production

    Hi all,
    We have CUA implemented for our non production systems. The Basis team wants to implement CUA for our 5 production environments (R3, BW, CRM, SEM and APO). What are the pros and cons of implementing CUA in production? An opinion of someone who has CUA implemented at their company would be most helpful.
    Thanks.
    Sashank

    Hi Sashank!
    We had a central user administration for a small 3-system landscape (from the beginning on).
    Advantage: the central handling. Inconsistencies between the systems won't be a topic.
    Disadvantage: Without experience it's possible to create quite a mess (once the user for distribution lost the authority to change profiles: nearly killed our system in this situation).
    Also having different users and authorities in different systems is nothing which will be easier with a central maintenance - on the other hand it's not more difficult either.
    Since your basis team has already experience with this tool, you can give it a go. We had no technical issues, only handling and organizational problems occured. Even workload was for a test system once a topic.
    Regards,
    Christian

  • Can we assign 1 credit control for multiple company codes

    hi,
    sap gurus,
    good afternoon to all
    can we assign 1 credit control area for multiple company codes.
    if yes can any body explain the pro's and cons of the assignment.
    if no can any body explain the why?
    its urgent plz.......
    regards,
    balaji.t
    09990019711

    Yes Balaji,
    We can assign.
    Here the risk categiry and terms of one credit control area will be applicable to all company code.
    Credit Control Area
    Definition
    An organizational unit that represents the area where customer credit is awarded and monitored.
    This organizational unit can either be a single or several company codes, if credit control is
    performed across several company codes. One credit control area contains credit control
    information for each customer.
    Use
    Credit and risk management takes place in the credit control area. According to your corporate
    requirements, you can implement credit management that is centralized, decentralized, or
    somewhere in between.
    For example, if your credit management is centralized, you can define one credit control
    area for all of your company codes.
    If, on the other hand, your credit policy requires decentralized credit management, you
    can define credit control areas for each company code or each group of company codes.
    Credit limits and credit exposure are managed at both credit control area and customer level.
    You set up credit control areas and other data related to credit management in Customizing for
    Financial Accounting. For more information, see the Implementation Guide under Enterprise
    Structure   Definition or   Assignment   Financial Accounting and then Maintain credit control
    area. You assign customers to specific credit control areas and specify the appropriate credit
    limits in the customer master record.
    Thanks,
    Raja

  • One SAP for several company

    We are using SAP as our ERP system. And now, we would like to add one more company into the system, Actually, the business of new comapany is totally differ to our existing business, and they are two entity. I would like to know, we use the existing to add new company or separate it into new SAP system. If add it into existing, anythings we have to concern. Thanks!

    The way you described the New company term in different posts, it's really confusing. Is this only a separate company code along with other related Org. Units? And the some extra user for that? If yes, you can go on creating them in the same client and create separate role structure (with different naming convention) for better security and assign them to the new users.
    And if it is different like: You are running one Cosmetics company through SAP and now want to implement SAP for other company, say Medicine,..... then you should forget about tampering your existing SAP Landscape. Please use new setup (hardware, OS, DB, ERP i.e. SAP etc...) for this.
    New client in the existing Boxes will become Night mare in future.
    Regards,
    Dipanjan

  • SAP implementation for the first time

    Hi,
    I'm still new to SAP and need to know a few things...
    Could someone help me with the answers of the following questions?
    1) What happens when a company goes through an SAP implementation for the first time.
    2) how the company goes into project mode to achieve success when implementing SAP.
    3) Project Members and what they do:
    Basis Analyst,
    Project Mgr,
    Security Analyst,
    Functional Analysts,
    Integration Manger,
    Technical Manager,
    ABAPers,
    etc.
    4) how the business gets involved to help project members get the help they need to implement SAP.
    Regards,
    Ashod

    Yergat wrote:
    Hi,
    > 1) What happens when a company goes through an SAP implementation for the first time.
    >
    SAP gets implemented
    > 2) how the company goes into project mode to achieve success when implementing SAP.
    Project mode is a state of anarchy between start and End, and being in the state for the longest period woud guarantee success....once you started, there should never be a end
    > 3) Project Members and what they do:
    > Basis Analyst,
    Analyses basic stuff
    > Project Mgr,
    He wrongly projects and manages filthily
    > etc.
    These are the most important ones, so always have them on board
    > 4) how the business gets involved to help project members get the help they need to implement SAP.
    > Regards,
    > Ashod
    When someone kicks on the back-side and we realize that we need to get onto Project mode - make no mistake my firend, it is the Business guys. the project guys need not worry, they will get this help for free

  • Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

    Hi,
    My issue is as follows.
    Production process spans across 2 company codes.
    Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
    Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
    Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
    We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
    However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
    Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
    I would be grateful for any ideas.
    Thanks,
    Szymon

    Hi Udo / Szymon.
    I have a question about this issue.
    In the sap help  about multiple valuations / group costing:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of  bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
    states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
    Could you clarify about this?
    thanks!!
    Arturo.
    Group Valuation
    Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
    When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
    For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
    To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
    Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
    In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
    You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
    The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
    To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

  • How to Install Seprate Language for New Company Code

    Hi,
    We have 5 company codes in 5 differant countries. Now they are planning to implement for CHINA country. Now i need to suggest them for the below queries.. Please give me some inputs..
    1.Language: Do we have to install Chinese "Simplified" prior to set-up/copying of the new  company code?
    2.Activation of the "international (multi) Address version" for AP/AR: Can you give us a separate quote for this, because we have to test this in depth?u201D
    Thanks
    Yadayya

    1.Language: Do we have to install Chinese "Simplified" prior to set-up/copying of the new company code?
    Ans:- No need to install, the language will available in the standard sap system, please contact to your BASIS consultant for this.
    2.Activation of the "international (multi) Address version" for AP/AR: Can you give us a separate quote for this, because we have to test this in depth?u201D
    Ans:- This can be activated through below path
    Logistic General--Business partners-Customers/VendorsControl--- Settings for Central Address Management
    After activation you have to upload the chinese descriptions for Vendor/Customer/GL/Asset/Material masters.
    also check below path
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/print-in-chinese-characters-1406778) 
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • COPA for 10 company code out of 14 company codes

    Hi Experts,
               I have one query regarding COPA. My one of the client want to implement COPA for 10 company code out of 14 company code of the company and all this 14 company codes come under single controlling area. And now client want to implement the COPA for 10 company codes.
    So my query is
    1 Whether it is possible to implement COPA for 10 company codes only?
    2 If it can be possible then which are the probable precautions to be taken. And also which are the challenges can be faced in this?
    Thanks & Regards
    Sri

    Hi Ajay
    Sorry for inconvenience because closed issue again I am re opening
    Could you please  give some additional input about the user exit
    Because  my abapers  put break point  even though it is not  triggering  that stage
    I am getting the below error message non relevant copa  company code
    Prof.segment for prim.cost elements not advisable for costing-based CO-PA
    Message no. KI183
    Thanks
    Sri

Maybe you are looking for