Workspace is locked exclusively by OS user null using machine null

Hi all,
I get the following strange message when trying to logon in the OWB design center (OWB 11.1.0.6, platform windows):
'The workspace is locked exclusively by OS user null using machine null'
There are no sessions running on the database (except control center service) and I'm the only user on the machine (my own laptop). All the OWB users are unlocked.
Any help is appreciated.
Regards,
Quinten

Metalink Doc ID 405935.1 addresses this problem.
Close all OWB clients.
Connect to DB via SQLPlus as the repository owner.
Run OWB_HOME\owb\rtp\sql\stop_service.sql.
Connect to DB via SQLPlus as sys with sysdba.
Run this: delete from sys.dbms_lock_allocated where name like 'OWB%';
On your other SQL session run: OWB_HOME\owb\rtp\sql\start_service.sql.
Close all sessions.
Start Warehouse Builder Client and connect.

Similar Messages

Lock sys and system user

Dear all,
We have 10.2.0.4 on solaris 10.
Currently we had I.T audit on our environment and auditor commented to lock sys and system user and use one user with any name (not oracle generic name) and grant him sys and system privilege and to use this user for admin purposes. is this right ?.. is this recommended ?
Please advise

Hello,
I think it's not a right way to lock SYS.
More over, if you connect as OS Administrator (root for Unix/linux) on the server and use
OS Authentification then, you can connect on SYS AS SYSDBA anyway.
So, in fact, it's not possible to lock out SYS even if you execute the following:
ALTER USER SYS ACCOUNT LOCK;If you want to prevent access on SYS you should set a complex and long password and
apply the same rule for the Administrator / root OS user.
These passwords must be known by very few and well - identified people and written nowhere
(in any files or scripts).
More over, you should limit DBA roles to SYS and SYSTEM and remove this powerful Role
from other Oracle Users.
Then, you may enable session AUDIT so as to control the connexion on the database and,
create a LOGON TRIGGER so as to check the login, workstation, program of the end users
who connect to the database.
On 10g, EM DBConsole shows an alert everytime a User is connected with SYS.
Please, find enclosed, an interesting document written by Pete Finigan on this topic:
http://www.insight.co.uk/files/presentations/Hacking%20and%20securing%20Oracle.pdf
Hope this help.
Best regards,
Jean-Valentin

[ConfigFwk:390105]Unable to create WLS change list due to a short term automatic lock obtained by user null

Hi,
I am getting this error while trying to activate a session in OSB (clustered env with 3 nodes). I have a OSB project which listens to a JMS queue. I was able to create the project fine and was able to activate the session, no issues. But when I tried to update the queue name or delete the project itself, this error gets thrown:
[ConfigFwk:390105]Unable to create WLS change list due to a short term automatic lock obtained by user null. The user has no pending changes and the lock will expire in 600 seconds. Please try again after the lock has expired.
Retrying after those seconds takes me back to the same error but the time get's reset to 600 sec.
I can change the code in that project and activate the session without any issues but if I change any configuration for proxy/business services or delete the project itself, i get this error. the only way to get around this issue is to clone the project and make changes to the cloned project. But, that is not the solution i am looking for as I don't want to keep a old version of the project and don't want to keep creating new queues everytime (since no two proxies can point to the same queue).
Oh, and this happens only with the projects which deal with JMS queues.
We are using OSB:
Oracle Service Bus Version: [Oracle Service Bus 11.1 Sun Dec 18 03:49:34 PST 2011 1447174]
Oracle Weblogic Server Version: [WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0.10 PSU Patch for BUG19637463 TUE NOV 04 15:54:42 IST 2014]
Please help.
Thanks,
Mukund.

Hi,
I am getting this error while trying to activate a session in OSB (clustered env with 3 nodes). I have a OSB project which listens to a JMS queue. I was able to create the project fine and was able to activate the session, no issues. But when I tried to update the queue name or delete the project itself, this error gets thrown:
[ConfigFwk:390105]Unable to create WLS change list due to a short term automatic lock obtained by user null. The user has no pending changes and the lock will expire in 600 seconds. Please try again after the lock has expired.
Retrying after those seconds takes me back to the same error but the time get's reset to 600 sec.
I can change the code in that project and activate the session without any issues but if I change any configuration for proxy/business services or delete the project itself, i get this error. the only way to get around this issue is to clone the project and make changes to the cloned project. But, that is not the solution i am looking for as I don't want to keep a old version of the project and don't want to keep creating new queues everytime (since no two proxies can point to the same queue).
Oh, and this happens only with the projects which deal with JMS queues.
We are using OSB:
Oracle Service Bus Version: [Oracle Service Bus 11.1 Sun Dec 18 03:49:34 PST 2011 1447174]
Oracle Weblogic Server Version: [WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0.10 PSU Patch for BUG19637463 TUE NOV 04 15:54:42 IST 2014]
Please help.
Thanks,
Mukund.

Lock by user null

Hi Dears,
i am facing problem in owb i can't deploy JOB , it gave me the following Error:
API0262 cannot place write lock on <this JOB> mapping lock is currently hold by OS user null
please i need yours advice to resolve this problem.
Best Regards.
Nedhal Alnusairi

Hi Nedhal,
The table USER_LOGIN_INFO owned by OWBSYS will give the information of users connected to OWB.
Get the session number and serial number from the table and kill all the sessions from backend.
ALTER SYSTEM KILL SESSION '<session#>,<serial#>';
Note: you have connect with sys user and replace the values <session#>,<serial#> as obtained from USER_LOGIN_INFO
Regards,
Pnreddy

TFS 2012 - no lock on check-out though policy is lock exclusive

we have a team project defined based on CMMI template and lock exclusive checkin policy (i.e. multiple checkout is off) and checkout is defined to do also getlatest. Users do check-out and check-in fluently, and each time they check-out, the object gets
locked and into edit mode, as should be.
However, there's a user for which check-out doesn't lock, as if it were with multiple checkout on, and only when the user explicitly clicks on advaneced->lock and then check-out, the object gets locked as should be. This user tried the exact same thing
on another PC and got the same behavior. Deleting and recrating his workspace in workspaces window didn't help, nor obviously team explorer repair didn't resolve the problem.
Note, when this user performes checkout, the locking options field in the checkout window that opens, is open for seletion for one of the two options as shown in attached pictures, rather than closed field with lock exclusive in it. Strange.
Can u please advise how to find what the problem is in this case, and better yet how to resolve it ?
Attached pictures :

The default setting at the collection level is a "suggested" setting and it can be overrules by the individual users in their own workspace configuration.
You can check the workspace configuration for your users using the commandline:
tf workspaces /format:detailed /owner:* /computer:* /collection:http://jessehouwing:8080/tfs/DemoCollection
You can replace * in Owner and Computer with an actual username or computer name.
To update a workspace using the commandline, use:
tf workspace /location:server collection:http://jessehouwing:8080/tfs/Democollection <<workspacename>>;<<owner>>
My blog: blog.jessehouwing.nl

How we can lock No more than one user can use the table at a single time

Hi Abapers,
0) which function modules to lock & unlock a table.
1) When you execute the program, we can check if there is any lock on this table. If yes, the user should be able to only view the table contents and not modify.
2) If there is no lock, then lock the table and go into change mode.
3) On exiting from the program, unlock the table using the function module.
4) more than one user can't modify the table just display.
Note: If there is any lock, display message saying table is locked.
Plz help me for this requirement.
Thanks
Nani

Hello Nani
Have a look at the lock object EMMARAE (Lock MARA and MARM/MAKT exclusively) in transaction SE11.
Inspect the F1 help for field Lock mode:
DE ENQMODE
Short Text
 Lock mode
Definition
 Defines how to synchronize table record access by several users.
The following modes exist:
 Exclusive lock
 The locked data can be read or processed by one user only. A request
 for another exclusive lock or for a shared lock is rejected.
 Shared lock
 Several users can read the same data at the same time, but as soon
 as a user edits the data, a second user can no longer access this
 data. Requests for further shared locks are accepted, even if they
 are issued by different users, but exclusive locks are rejected.
 Exclusive but not cumulative lock
 Exclusive locks can be requested by the same transaction more than
 once and handled successively, but an exclusive but not cumulative
 lock can only be requested once by a given transaction. All other
 lock requests are rejected.
If you want to lock a standard table search whether the table is used in lock objects (Where-Used-List). If it is a customer table you have to create your own lock object (including two function modules: one for enqueuing and the other for dequeuing).
The lock modules can be found in menu GoTo -> Lock Modules.
Given these lock modules the logic should be quite clear after starting the program:
1. Request lock -> if successful, continue in Change mode; -> if failed, continue in Display mode
2. Before leaving the report remove lock (note: no problem if no lock has been set in the beginning).
Regards
Uwe

Select and update with lock exclusive

Hello Everybody
In our application we have a table autonum to handle unique keys for all other tables.
In Autonum we have a column "SUCHBEGRIFF" char(40) unique KEY and a column "WERT" fixed(10,0).
Suchbegriff has values like Rechnungsnr,Auftragsnr,Bestellnr ...
Example:
Befor inserting a record into table rechnungen we do:
Select wert from autonun where suchbegriff = "Rechnungsnr" with lock exclusive.
l_rechnrneu = wert + 1
update autonum set wert = ?l_rechnrneu where suchbegriff = "Rechnungsnr"
commit
(then l_rechnrneu is used for an insert into rechnungen command)
This technic works for all tables (250) in our application.
We have about 400 concurrent users working with maxdb 7.6 via odbc 7.6
No problems since 2 years!
Now we start some backgroundjobs from an xp-workstation.
We have scheduled 5 jobs, starting every 5 minutes, same time.(Same user,same odbc-connection)
Each job inserts records into a table joblogs and therefore needs a unique JOBLOGNR from autonum.
Now we run into problems 2 or 3 times a day?
<Sometimes the backgound jobs are running (waiting?) without inserting a record into joblogs (deadlock?)
And more worse:
Sometimes the insert into joblogs failes with "duplicate key" ??
We don't know where to begin? Maxdb Problem ? Workstation problem?
Any help welcomed
Best regards
Albert

> >Gosh - that's information overloading at it's best...
> We call this needed information.
> What does our SAP-System? We have 1 mandt,60 accounting areas and about 200 werks!
> Of course SAP uses internal unique keys for all tables, but we configured different "number intervals" for each werks.
With "information overloading" I was referring to the multiple meanings you encode in just one column (your "rechnungs-no").
SAP tables do not have this.
As you wrote, there is "MANDT", "BUKRS", "WERKS" ... and the primary key is defined over all relevant columns.
There is no primary key column where all the different meanings are concatenated together.
So there aren't any surrogate keys here (a.k.a. AUTOID) used here - (ok except the infamous DDLOG sequence...).
> >What do you do, when the value of an invoice has to be changed? Update the primary key of the table?
> Update rechnungen set amount = xyz,...... where rechnungnr = nnn
> We never change rechnungsnr,if the invoice was wrong we produce a credit for it and then write a new invoice
So, you could use a sequence here instead as well.
> > We don't use rollback when fetching logids from autonum.
> >So what do you do, when connection fails, the database crashes or the client application hits an error?
> >You use rollback. There is no way to avoid it.
> >Your application gets a "duplicate key" error - the database performs a rollback of your last action. What does your application do then? Commit?
> Sorry, i meant that we do not do rollbacks over 2 or 3 inserts or updates in different tables.
> SQL-Command,On error = messagebox,errorlog,quit
You don't handle the fetching of the new number in the same transaction as the actual insert of your application data in the same transaction?
> >What isolation level do you use?
> We use DATABASE ISOLATION LEVEL 0
Hmm... did you read the documentation on SQL Locks?
[Internals Course - SQL Locks|http://maxdb.sap.com/training/internals_7.6/locking_EN_76.pdf] :
"Isolation level 0 does not offer any protection against access anomalies."
Basically it might have happened that the same number is read twice.
Perhaps the application is not always requiring locks when reading data from this table?
> After connecting to the database via odbc we do
> =SQLSETPROP(verbindungsnr,"Transactions",2)
> 2 = Transaction processing is handled manually through SQLCOMMIT( ) and SQLROLLBACK( ). Read/write.
> =SQLSETPROP(verbindungsnr,"DisconnectRollback",.T.)
>
>
> So normal select commands are fired without a following commit.
> Insert and update commands are fired with a following commit command.
> Selects from autonum are fired with "look exclusive"
Please be more detailed here.
What is the exact sequence of actions here?
1. Fetch number from number table and update number table.
2. COMMIT
3. Insert new application data with the just fetched number.
4. COMMIT
or
1. Fetch number from number table and update number table.
2. Insert new application data with the just fetched number.
3. COMMIT
And what does your application do with its data when a rollback occurs?
Is it guaranteed that all variables are reset?
> Nevertheless you dislike our design, do you think it would be better (quicker,safer...) to use an internal databases procedure to get
> the next speaking number for a given "suchbegriff" from our autonum table? (no translation of the sql-command every time)
No, currently we don't know what is causing the problem, so we cannot tell whether such a change would help. In fact, right now it would make things more complicated because we would less understand, what's happening here.
Concerning your design: it's not about "liking" or "not liking it".
I just pointed out some problems that result from the design as it is.
> select wert into :neuerwert FROM "BWPROGI"."AUTONUM" WHERE upper(suchbegriff) = upper(:suchkey) WITH LOCK EXCLUSIVE;
> update "BWPROGI"."AUTONUM" set wert = wert + 1 WHERE upper(suchbegriff) = upper(:suchkey) ;
> SET neuerwert = neuerwert + 1;
> end;
1. The WHERE clause UPPER(suchbegriff) = UPPER(...) is the best way to disable the efficient use of any index structure. Better make sure that your data is in the right format in the table when you enter it and then look it up without the UPPER() conversion.
2. I wouldn't perform the increment two times.
Get the current value into your variable, increment this variable, set the current value in the table to the variable.
> A char(10) return value would be nice and i don't know wether this would be the quicker way.
Why should it? You would have to convert it first - that's additional work.
Anyhow, to move ahead with your duplicate keys problem, you may perform a vtrace with the "stop on error" option.
As your error is a duplicate key on a primary key constraint you should set "stop on error" to the error code "200".
The next time your application hits the error, the vtrace automatically stops and we could examine what happened before.
See [MaxDB database trace|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/2yg] for details on how to activate the trace.
When the error occurs next time and you caught it in the vtrace we can take a look at it.
regards,
Lars

Failed to create new user null

All Experts
I am getting the following error message when I am trying to start Java Engine. I am trying to add Java Add on to the ABAP Stack. This was taken from security.0.log .
#1.5#001143312344001E00000003000006B400044C1E4BBCD4E7#1209592910253#/System/Security/UserStoreUME##com.sap.security.core.server.userstore.UserContextUME#######SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_14##0#0#Error#1#com.sap.security.core.server.userstore.UserContextUME#Plain###
Failed to create new user null#
#1.5#001143312344001E00000005000006B400044C1E4BBCFE64#1209592910253#/System/Security/UserStoreUME##com.sap.security.core.server.userstore.UserContextUME.engineCreateUser(String)#######SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_14##0#0#Info#1#com.sap.security.core.server.userstore.UserContextUME#Java###Created new user #1#<null>#
#1.5#001143312344001E00000006000006B400044C1E4BBCFFBA#1209592910253#/System/Security/UserStoreUME##com.sap.security.core.server.userstore.UserContextUME#######SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_14##0#0#Error#1#/System/Security/UserStoreUME#Java###Error during creation of default users or role assignments: #1#
Could not create user null: LOGONID_IS_NULL#
#1.5#001143312344001E00000008000006B400044C1E4BBD03D0#1209592910253#/System/Security##com.sap.engine.services.userstore.UserContext.<init>(UserContextSpi, Properties)#######SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_14##0#0#Fatal#1#com.sap.engine.services.userstore#Plain###Can not instantiate UserContext with given properties.#
#1.5#001143312344001E0000000B000006B400044C1E4BBD5C7C#1209592910284#/System/Security##com.sap.engine.services.security#######SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_14##0#0#Error#1#com.sap.engine.services.security#Java#security_0001#com.sap.engine.services.security.exceptions.SecurityResourceBundle#Unexpected exception:##
Please suggest

Hi Prasanna
I am getting this error while installing the Java Add-on. The installation was in the last stage and there it got struck when it tried to reboot the java engine. I am using SAPJSF user to communicate with ABAP stack and it has the full authorizations. I even checked and see that SAPJSF user is not locked. I also tried with another user and still the same issue. As per the log it the java engine is able to login with the user, but it is trying to create a user and fialing there. I am not sure why it is creating this user.
Regards,
Mahesh

Login failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection

"[DBNETLIB] Login failed for user '(null)'. Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection"
After patches applied on patch Tuesday the database reports the above error.
All accounts are domain accounts and SQLServer uses Windows auth.
DCDIAG show no errors
All servers and DC have been restarted,
Message in db log confirms the connection is being denied due to trust.
Event log shows same rejection
Protocols enabled: named pipes, tcpip, memory
TESTS:
PortQry: "
TCP port 1433 (ms-sql-s service): LISTENING"
Connect with domain admin accounts works from multiple clients systems to DB.
Cannot connect with newly created domain admin account
Can connect if new admin account connect to server in terminal server session and uses UDL wizard or any other tool including isql.
New standard user also fails to connect.
NOTES:
I removed the SSL patch and the IE security update to see if that was an issue.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Has someone left the company or has an account of some nature been dropped/replaced?
Please click "Mark As Answer" if my post helped. Tony C.
Hi Tony,
Srry but No. We just installed the monthly updates.
I went back and found I had missed removing a patch. I missed the rollup for Windows Server 2003:
Event Type: Information
Event Source: NtServicePack
Event Category: None
Event ID: 4382
Date:  3/12/2015
Time:  12:26:04 PM
User:  NETTEST\admin
Computer: DATA1
Description:
Windows Server 2003 KB954920 was removed from your computer, and the previous Windows Server 2003 configuration was restored.
After I removed that is still didn't work but after about five minutes it started working.
I guess I ned to report that to MS after I research what might be changed to make the patch work.
Every time I get stuck and ask for help it seems to be just before I stumble on the solution.
Thanks for replying.
Well - maybe this will help someone else.
Thanks again for replying Tony
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I'm signed in to my account on my macbook air's apple store, but when I try to update any apps, it has a locked in apple store user which is not mine, any help removing this?

I'm signed in to my account on my macbook air's apple store, but when I try to update any apps, it has a locked in apple store user which is not mine. I have no idea where this user came from, but I need to update my apps and get this user off my computer. The users email is locked, it is grey in colour and I can not get it off. I've tried my system settings and the app store, logging in does not change the fact that there is a strange email there. I need help, please! I don't know if this is a hack or what, I brought my computer into the shop to get some work done so it may be their account, I just need the account removed.

You installed a hacked app, originally from the Mac App Store. It contains the receipt for a different app, downloaded using an account that you don't control. You need to identify and remove the hacked app.
Important: The app you need to remove is not necessarily the one named in the App Store alert. For example, the App Store may prompt you to update "Angry Birds" or "Twitter," but the hacked app may be something else entirely. Don't make any assumptions about which app you're looking for. To find it, you must carry out a systematic search with Spotlight.
Triple-click anywhere in the line of text below on this page to select it:
kMDItemAppStoreHasReceipt=1
Copy the selected text to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C.
In the Finder, press command-F to open a search window, or select
File ▹ Find
from the menu bar. In the search window, select
Search: This Mac
from the row of tokens below the toolbar. Below that is a popup menu of search criteria, initially showing Kind. From that menu, select
Other...
A sheet will drop down. In that sheet, select
Raw Query
as the criterion, then click OK or press return.
Now there will be a text box to the right of the menu of search criteria. That's where you enter the raw search query. Click in that box and paste the text you copied earlier by pressing command-V.
The search window will now show all the App Store products that are installed. Compare those search results with the list of your purchases from the App Store. To see the complete list, you may need to unhide hidden purchases. If any apps were download from the App Store using other Apple ID accounts that you control, sign in to the store under each of those ID's and check the purchases.
At least one of the apps in the Spotlight search results is not among your purchases in the App Store. Move each such item to the Trash, after quitting it if it's running. You may be prompted for your administrator password. Empty the Trash.
Quit and relaunch the App Store. Test.

Locks list for a user session

Hello,
Is there a function module or class/method which will give me the list of all locks of a user in the current session and not across all sessions (like transaction SM12). Function modules like ENQUE_READ and ENQUE_READ2 provides the lock list for a user across all sessions but not in the seesion in which the FM is being executed.
Please let me know if you have any information in this regard.
Thanks & Regards,
Saurabh

Hi saurabh,
Dont post duplicate thread . Its against the rule of engagement.
Locks list for a user session
If you have got the answer in the previous thraed then close this thread.
Regards,
Sujit

Java.lang.SecurityException: Authentication for user null denied in realm

Hello,
We have the following exceptionj on WLS 6.1 SP3 on Win2K:
javax.naming.AuthenticationException. Root exception is
java.lang.SecurityException: Authentication for user null denied in realm
weblogic
at weblogic.security.acl.Realm.authenticate(Realm.java:212)
at weblogic.security.acl.Realm.getAuthenticatedName(Realm.java:233)
at
weblogic.security.acl.internal.Security.authenticate(Security.java:135)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.pushUser(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:518)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.newContext(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:362)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:334)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:211)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactory.java:149)
at
javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java:660)
at
javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:241)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.init(InitialContext.java:217)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.<init>(InitialContext.java:173)
at
And it seems that this exception happens after the introduction of a JAAS module
for an external call.
What strikes me is that the WLS samples use System.setProperty... and I was wondering
if this could be the cause of our problem, because the rest of the application
does not use JAAS, and that may be it screws up the realm with WLS....
Any idea?
Cheers,
Thierry

Hello,
We have the following exceptionj on WLS 6.1 SP3 on Win2K:
javax.naming.AuthenticationException. Root exception is
java.lang.SecurityException: Authentication for user null denied in realm
weblogic
at weblogic.security.acl.Realm.authenticate(Realm.java:212)
at weblogic.security.acl.Realm.getAuthenticatedName(Realm.java:233)
at
weblogic.security.acl.internal.Security.authenticate(Security.java:135)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.pushUser(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:518)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.newContext(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:362)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:334)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:211)
at
weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactory.java:149)
at
javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(NamingManager.java:660)
at
javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(InitialContext.java:241)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.init(InitialContext.java:217)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.<init>(InitialContext.java:173)
at
And it seems that this exception happens after the introduction of a JAAS module
for an external call.
What strikes me is that the WLS samples use System.setProperty... and I was wondering
if this could be the cause of our problem, because the rest of the application
does not use JAAS, and that may be it screws up the realm with WLS....
Any idea?
Cheers,
Thierry

Lock the plant so that other user cannot use the same plant.

Hi Gurus!
I ahve this small report which shows the pro-rate factor . In this report I need to block the plant or lock it(a soft) lock witha message that some other user is using the plant so that other cannot use the same plant to post.Following is the report and if soemone can help me out would be very kind enough.I ahve added teh code where validation of plant is doen , so it must be somewhere here the locking should be done as per my thinking . Kindly suggest please.
*& Form get_pro_factor
* get pro rate factor from the given
* combination of plant/sloc/mat#/period
form get_pro_factor .
select single zpr_factor zpr_disp_factor zpr_pipe_net zpr_pipe_gross
from zprfactor
into (zprfactor-zpr_factor, zprfactor-zpr_disp_factor,
 zprfactor-zpr_pipe_net, zprfactor-zpr_pipe_gross)
where zpr_werks = p_werks and
 zpr_lgort = p_lgort and
 zpr_matnr = p_matnr and
 zpr_mjahr = p_mjahr and
 zpr_monat = p_monat.
v_subrc = sy-subrc.
if zprfactor-zpr_factor = 0.
 if c_wp = p_lgort+0(2).
 zprfactor-zpr_factor = 1. " Don C added this routine
 endif.
endif.
if zprfactor-zpr_disp_factor is initial.
 if not zprfactor-zpr_pipe_gross is initial.
 zprfactor-zpr_disp_factor = zprfactor-zpr_pipe_net / zprfactor-zpr_pipe_gross.
 endif.
 if zprfactor-zpr_disp_factor is initial.
 zprfactor-zpr_disp_factor = 1.
 endif.
endif.
endform. " get_pro_factor
*& Form valid_plant
* validate whether plant entered in selection screen
* exists in database or not
form valid_plant .
if not ( p_werks is initial and
 p_lgort is initial and
 p_matnr is initial and
 p_mjahr is initial and
 p_monat is initial ).
 select single werks from t001w into t001w-werks
 where werks = p_werks.
 if sy-subrc ne 0.
 message e048(zmm) with p_werks.
 endif.
endif.
endform. " valid_plant
*& Form FIND_MATKL
form find_matkl .
select single matkl into v_matkl from mara where matnr = p_matnr.
endform. " FIND_MATKL
*& Form UPDATE_ZPRFACTOR
form update_zprfactor using p_flag. "DEVK903224
call function 'ENQUEUE_E_TABLEE'
 exporting
 mode_rstable = c_e
 tabname = 'ZPRFACTOR'
 exceptions
 foreign_lock = 1
 system_failure = 2
 others = 3.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
 message id sy-msgid type sy-msgty number sy-msgno
 with sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
else.
 select single * from zprfactor where zpr_werks = p_werks
 and zpr_lgort = p_lgort
 and zpr_matnr = p_matnr
 and zpr_monat = p_monat
 and zpr_mjahr = p_mjahr.
 if sy-subrc = 0.
 zprfactor-zpr_rate_flag = p_flag. "DEVK903224
 update zprfactor.
 endif.
endif.
call function 'DEQUEUE_E_TABLEE'
 exporting
 mode_rstable = c_e
 tabname = 'ZPRFACTOR'.
Thanks
Aarav

call function 'ENQUEUE_E_TABLEE'
 exporting
 mode_rstable = c_e
 tabname = 'ZPRFACTOR'
 exceptions
 foreign_lock = 1
 system_failure = 2
 others = 3.
ENQUEUE_E_TABLEE } E_TABLEE is the name of the lock object, it starts with character "E".

SDO gives JBO-26030: Failed to lock the record, another user holds the lock

Hi,
I have a question thats on the boundary between ADF and BPEL but I posted in this forum because its highly related to ADF Model with Service Interface.
We have a BPEL batch process that spawns multiple child BPEL processes that handle threads inside the batch in parallel. These child processes all update the same batch record in a database with for example the lastActionDateTime. We do this by invoking an update service on a SDO application that we built following this tutorial: http://jianmingli.com/wp/?p=2838
It all works good but sometimes when updating the same row from multiple BPEL process instances at the same time, we sometimes get a SDO JBO-26030: Failed to lock the record, another user holds the lock.
I'm a bit stunned by this, because all we really do is updating a record. From BPEL we just invoke the updateBatch webservice method of the Service Interface.
I can imagine that there will be wait time when these updates come in at the same time, but I didn't expect an exception would occur. Also the arbitrariness confuses me. If a child process would lock the record, I would expect this error to happen always and not at random.
From BPEL the error displays as follows:
 <fault>
 <bpelFault>
 <faultType>1</faultType>
 <ServiceException>
 <part name="ServiceErrorMessage">
 <tns:ServiceErrorMessage>
 <tns:code>26030</tns:code>
 <tns:message>JBO-26030: Failed to lock the record, another user holds the lock.</tns:message>
 <tns:severity>SEVERITY_ERROR</tns:severity>
 <tns:exceptionClassName>oracle.jbo.AlreadyLockedException</tns:exceptionClassName>
 </tns:ServiceErrorMessage>
 </part>
 </ServiceException>
 </bpelFault>
 </fault>However when I dive into soa_server1-diagnostic.log I see the following exception:
[2011-10-28T17:37:37.770+02:00] [soa_server1] [ERROR] [] [oracle.jbo.server.svc.ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '8' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: a1484c49db38e963:-581f01fc:13345d7173d:-8000-00000000000322f4,0:1:0x5f5e2bf:33] [WEBSERVICE_PORT.name: ECMControllerSDOServiceSoapHttpPort] [APP: ECMControllerSDO] [composite_name: ECMProcessController] [component_name: ProcessControllerBPEL] [component_instance_id: 240335] [J2EE_MODULE.name: ECMControllerSDO] [WEBSERVICE.name: ECMControllerSDOService] [J2EE_APP.name: ECMControllerSDO] [[
oracle.jbo.RowInconsistentException: JBO-25014: Another user has changed the row with primary key oracle.jbo.Key[CDS_20111028_8 ].
 at oracle.jbo.server.OracleSQLBuilderImpl.doEntitySelectForAltKey(OracleSQLBuilderImpl.java:1077)
 at oracle.jbo.server.BaseSQLBuilderImpl.doEntitySelect(BaseSQLBuilderImpl.java:553)
 at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.doSelect(EntityImpl.java:8134)
 at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.lock(EntityImpl.java:5863)
 at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.beforePost(EntityImpl.java:6369)
 at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.postChanges(EntityImpl.java:6551)
 at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.doPostTransactionListeners(DBTransactionImpl.java:3275)
 at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.postChanges(DBTransactionImpl.java:3078)
 at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.commitInternal(DBTransactionImpl.java:2088)
 at oracle.jbo.server.DBTransactionImpl.commit(DBTransactionImpl.java:2369)
 at oracle.jbo.server.DefaultJTATxnHandlerImpl.commit(DefaultJTATxnHandlerImpl.java:156)
 at oracle.jbo.server.svc.ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl.commit(ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl.java:216)
 at oracle.jbo.server.svc.ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl.beforeCompletion(ServiceJTATxnHandlerImpl.java:124)
 at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2677.invoke(Unknown Source)
 at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
 at oracle.jbo.server.svc.WLSContextCrossAppProxy$WLSCrossAppProxy.invoke(WLSContextCrossAppProxy.java:66)
 at $Proxy377.beforeCompletion(Unknown Source)
 at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.doBeforeCompletion(ServerSCInfo.java:1239)
 at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.callBeforeCompletions(ServerSCInfo.java:1214)
 at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.startPrePrepareAndChain(ServerSCInfo.java:116)
 at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.localPrePrepareAndChain(ServerTransactionImpl.java:1316)
 at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.globalPrePrepare(ServerTransactionImpl.java:2132)
 at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.internalCommit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:272)
 at weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:239)
 at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.BaseRemoteObject.postInvoke1(BaseRemoteObject.java:625)
 at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.StatelessRemoteObject.postInvoke1(StatelessRemoteObject.java:49)
 at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.BaseRemoteObject.__WL_postInvokeTxRetry(BaseRemoteObject.java:444)
 at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:53)
 at nl.kpn.ecm4crm.am.server.serviceinterface.ECMControllerSDOServiceImpl_51vl7y_ECMControllerSDOServiceImpl.updateBatches(Unknown Source)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
 at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.invoke(RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.java:85)
 at $Proxy373.updateBatches(Unknown Source)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
 at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.jaxws.ServiceEndpointRuntime.processMessage(ServiceEndpointRuntime.java:355)
 at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.jaxws.ServiceEndpointRuntime.processMessage(ServiceEndpointRuntime.java:196)
 at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.jaxws.JAXWSRuntimeDelegate.processMessage(JAXWSRuntimeDelegate.java:479)
 at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.provider.ProviderProcessor.doEndpointProcessing(ProviderProcessor.java:1187)
 at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.WebServiceProcessor.invokeEndpointImplementation(WebServiceProcessor.java:1081)
 at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.provider.ProviderProcessor.doRequestProcessing(ProviderProcessor.java:581)
 at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.WebServiceProcessor.processRequest(WebServiceProcessor.java:232)
 at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.WebServiceProcessor.doService(WebServiceProcessor.java:192)
 at oracle.j2ee.ws.server.WebServiceServlet.doPost(WebServiceServlet.java:459)
 at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)
 at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
 at oracle.jbo.server.svc.ServiceContextFilter.doFilter(ServiceContextFilter.java:78)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
 at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter$1.run(JpsAbsFilter.java:111)
 at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
 at oracle.security.jps.util.JpsSubject.doAsPrivileged(JpsSubject.java:313)
 at oracle.security.jps.ee.util.JpsPlatformUtil.runJaasMode(JpsPlatformUtil.java:413)
 at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.runJaasMode(JpsAbsFilter.java:94)
 at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsAbsFilter.doFilter(JpsAbsFilter.java:161)
 at oracle.security.jps.ee.http.JpsFilter.doFilter(JpsFilter.java:71)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
 at oracle.dms.servlet.DMSServletFilter.doFilter(DMSServletFilter.java:136)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(WebAppServletContext.java:3715)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3681)
 at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
 at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2277)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2183)
 at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1454)
 at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:207)
 at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:176)Thank you for reading, any directions suggestions on how to solve this will be highly appreciated.
regards,
Gerben

Thanks Frank.
Already tried that , please let me know if there is any other way to get this .
This is being discussed here :
Re: Update without No wait
and i am following what John Stegeman has suggested.

Locking and unlocking mass users

Hello
How can we lock and unlock mass users?
Edited by: Mohammed Siddiqui on Jul 16, 2008 2:37 PM

Hi Siddique,
Follow the below link
Re: locking users while implementing support packs
Regards
Zam

Workspace is locked exclusively by OS user null using machine null

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for