Wrong value of qty based excise condition in migo

Dear all,
I am using taxinn procedure. Condition type JMIQ/JMOQ is maintained in po. Calculations are correct at po level but while doing migo the condition value gets doubled. What could be the reason? I've already checked for duplicate records.
Thanks in anticipation.

Hello,
have u used any calculation type ? if yes then remove that first.Please check in Tax procedure.
regards,
sujit

Similar Messages

PO header level excise condition in MIGO are wrong

Hello ,
While doing goods receipt
Item excise Codition values are as follow
BED = 959.71
ECS = 19.24
SECESS = 9.62
But at header level it is showing as ( divide by 100)
BED = 9.59
ECS = 0.19
SECess = 0.09
Please help to resolve this issue

Hello,
have u used any calculation type ? if yes then remove that first.Please check in Tax procedure.
regards,
sujit

Refresh Cell Value Of Column Based On Condition

Hi Experts,
I m working on UI5 grid.
This my grid:
My requirement is:
On change of "Actual Value ", if value is in between UL and LL then "Sub Test" column should be refreshed with image(ex.green ! mark)
Till Now i achieved upto comarision in columns:
But now i stucked with ,how to refresh image in "Sub Test" column based on valued entered in "Actual Value" column.
Request your ideas.
Regards,
Neha

You can also use CalcFields to bind to your data if you don't want the Icon column to be part of you model.
Documentation/AdvancedTopics/DataBinding/CalcFields – SAPUI5 Wiki (TIP CORE User Interface)
I've modified Dennis' example slightly to use a CalcField, notice the paths are defined to create a composite binding, the data is the automatically passed to the formatter function.
http://jsbin.com/poren/1/edit
Regards,
Jason

CIN - with TAXINJ and "condition based excise determination"

Dear All,
Can I use TAXINJ with "condition based excise determination" for CIN implemenation. We already have TAXINJ and some plants are already working on it.
If anyone already using the same, please share the problems faced / experience.
Actually I done settings for above scenario, but while GRN I am getting Message as " BED, AED and SED for the excise item is zero". And BED not getting populated while doing GRn.
I have created a tax code "C1" and assigned to company code.
THen I have maintained condition record for JMOP in FV11 for BED. ALso settings done J1ID.
PO is created with this tax code C1, taxes are getting calculated when
checked at Invoice tab at PO.
But while making GRN message comes "BED, AED and SED for the excise
item is zero" and excise values dont shows at excise tab in MIGO
Regards

Go through
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/CIN+Configuration
and
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/09/ebf138cdd78a4be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope you will get good idea

Validity of the Qty Based Condition

Hi All
In one of my scenarios, I am using a Tax Code containing Qty Based BED Condition.
Like V3 Tax Code BED + VAT, BED / Qty Condition is JMOQ
I am maintaining FV11 - JMOQ
Value for Plant / Material Group Combination is 500 / TON with Validity 28.02.2009 to 27.02.2010
No I am trying to set the different Value for the different Validity like 550 / TON with Validity 28.02.2010 to 27.02.2011
Then system gives me Error as the condition is being processed in the current session.
Tax Procedure in use - TAXINN
Kindly guide me.

Sorry
I already did this activity.
But couldnt find out the solution.
Anyways
Thanks for your reply
Resolved with some other trials.

Manual Excise condition type with calculation type as FIXED AMOUNT

Dear Gurus,
I have used a manual excise condition (JMAN) in my pricing procedure the difference is that I've changed its calcultaion type to FIXED AMOUNT.
And in the same pricing procedure I have also got a percentage based Excise condition (ZEXC).
And in any transaction either of the one that is JMAN or ZEXC will be used.
The Manual Excise condition is used basically when the raw material sale takes place. The requirement is as such that they should be able to enter the duty value in INR and not in percentage. Please go through the example below
*(For Example I am procuring raw material of 100 kg worth 10000 at 8% of excise duty. Excise duty will be 800 for 10000rs. So it will be 8 rs per KG.
And now suppose I am utilizing 80 kg for production and want to sell remaining 20 kg. the Excise duty charged should be 160 rs. considering the rate per unit is 8rs.)*
In this case user wants to enter the value in INR and not in percentage.
And normally for the finished goods the percentage based condition is used.
Now what my issue is that how will I copy the value from JMAN to ZEXC at the raw material sale. otherwise my finished good sales is happening without any problem.
For this should I use any routine to copy the values from ZMAN to ZEXC??
Or rather is it possible that I could copy values from a condition type whose calculation type is FIXED AMOUNT to other condition whose calculation type is percentage.
How should I go ahead with this??
Please guide me.
Any answers??
Cant Do it this way??
Thanks & Regards
Anand.k
Edited by: anand k on Jul 8, 2009 6:38 AM
Edited by: anand k on Jul 8, 2009 1:04 PM

Check the condtion value in condition type UTXJ . If the JMOD value is 10% of UTXJ then assessable value should have been maintained for the Material and Plant combination in J1ID. This is due to Routine 351 maintined in pricing procedure for the condition type UTXJ
check and confirm
Senthils

Date difference based on the conditions is giving wrong values

Hi,
In creating the formula for conditional date difference calculation,
i.e.,
if (sto date is 0) then (act date - mat rel date) else (sto date is not equal to 0) then (sto date - mat rel date)
So I tried with,
(sto date == 0) * (act date - mat rel date) + (sto date <> 0) * (sto date - mat rel date)
But I am getting a wrong value even with decimals as days can't be in decimals. Please suggest where I am going wrong in calculation.
Thanks,
Best Regards,
Darshan MS

Hi Darshan,
First of all, were the dates converted already to keyfigure?
If not, please check:
Convert a Characteristic into a Key Figure (BEx)
If they were already converted, try this:
(sto date == 0) * (act date - mat rel date) + (sto date - mat rel date)
Regards,
Loed

Excise rates not reflecting in PO based on values entered in newly created condition table in TAXINN.

Dear SAP Gurus,
I have created a new condition table using t.code m/03 by taking a copy of existing standard condition table. I have assigned the newly created condition table to access sequence. After assignment of condition table i have entered the relevant excise rates in excise condition types using the newly created key combination through t.code FV12. When i enter the Tax Code in PO, excise duty rates are not reflecting in PO. When i am entering the excise rates in any other standard key combination, excise rates are reflecting in PO.
Following are the fields in newly created key combination (Condition Table)
1) Country
2) Plant
3) Control Code
4) Tax Code
Kindly help me in resolving the issue.
Regards,
Vinay

HI,
Check whether you have maintained the rates for the new tax code in FV11 also whether you have assigned the tax code to the company code ?
Compare the tax code which is working in PO with the one which is not & find out if there is any difference.
If you want to post the tax values to the new G/L in OB40 then maintain the same settings for the tax code which is working in PO.
Thanks & Regards,

Ranch Billing, the excise condition type JMOD calculation is wrong

Hi
I wish to know that in case of Branch Billing, the excise condition type calculation is wrong!!
I am surprised and unable to know how it could be?
In billing document display (T.code VF03) , Out of 3 Line items, Basic Excise Duty of 2 line items/ Materials were wrongly calculated.
i.e. In Item level Condition Overview---> the excise condition type JMOD --> details -->
Amount                   10.000 %
Cond.base value            79,077.85 INR
Condition value             5,733.14 INR
                                                                                Alt.calc.type   355
Ideally, It must be 7907.85 INR instead of 5733.14 INR wrong value.
Please help me to know the possible reason.
Thanking you.
PP

Check the condtion value in condition type UTXJ . If the JMOD value is 10% of UTXJ then assessable value should have been maintained for the Material and Plant combination in J1ID. This is due to Routine 351 maintined in pricing procedure for the condition type UTXJ
check and confirm
Senthils

Webi base on BW query based on Infoset comes back with wrong values

Hello:
I have a Webi report on an OLAP Universe, on Bex Query.
The bex query is based on 1 INFOSET.
When I run the webi report the values that comes back a totally wrong values.
The correct results are not brought back.
When I do a test with crystal reports to the infoset, I can see the correct values. (I'm aware crystal uses different drivers).
The test is BW query designer, and crystal brings back proper values from Infoset based BW query.
Webi on Infoset based BW Query comes back with wrong data.
query is simple.
Pull in 3 attributes, 3 key figures, where componentkey = "111"
I get 36 rows in Crystal and 36 rows in Bex Analyzer, 36 rows in BW query designer (web analyzer).
I get many rows in webi (almost like a CARTENSIAN product).
I search a round this forum but still did not see a conclusive answer to this problem.
But I see another thread that several others faced this same issue without a resolution.
My environment.
BOE XI 3.1 SP2
No fix packs
SAP IK 3.1 SP2
HPUX-IA64
Thanks in advance for any help.
Dwayne

Was this problem ever solved?
I am having a similar problem with an infoset based query.
I have created the BW infoset, and confirmed that the correct data is returned from the underlying infoproviders. A simple BW query on that infoset yields the same results.
Create the universe, and then the WEBI, and WEBI now shows hundreds of records where I expect 10. Data is being returned in WEBI that definitely shouldn't be there. It's almost like the restrictions applied in the characteristic restriction area of my BW query are being ignored, even if I include them in the WEBI query.
Cheers,
Andrew

At time of return depot invoice creation , not capture Excise Condition Value

Hi,
my queastion is that
In retun process from Customer to Depot,
when user create return Depot invoice through t-code VF01 then Not capture Excise Condition Value ( JEXP - Basic Excise Duty , JCEP- Edu. Cess Duty and JA1X - Additional tax. ) at time of Depot. Invoice Creation.
we can also check Table J_1IRG23D, in this table have value of these Excise Cond. Value.
But Delivery No. is not update in table J_1IRG23D.
and I applied condition formula 356 in Procedure ZDOM02 ( Traders Pricing Procedure).
How can capture condition value of JEXP, JCEP and JA1X at time of Retrun Depot Invoice Creation ?
Guide me .....

Hi,
I have flow your define step:
Returns from Customer to Depot
1     Create a return order in Depot
2     Key in the invoice number and execute
3     Assign Order Reason and save
4     Create a return delivery and do PGR. Maintain storage location 1030
5     Create Transfer posting in MB1B with movement type 453, storage location 1030 and save
6     Note down the material document reference
7     Go to J1IG to reverse excise issue posting
8     Click "Capture"
9     Key in the material document number and series group
10     Click "Details". Now select the line item and again click "More documents"
11     Key in the original excise invoice reference created at supplying plant
12     Skip all warning message and go back
13     Maintain the internal number and the year.
14     With this, entry from RG23D will be reversed
But still the excise condition values are not being captured during invoice VF01 and std depot routing 356 is being used.
Program name of depot routing is FV64A356.
we can also check Table J_1IRG23D, in this table have value of these Excise Cond. Value.
But Delivery No. is not update in table J_1IRG23D.
Guide me.........

Rebate Issue: Qty Based Cond Type

Hi All,
I need to know only functional way (cant use update in pricing routine due to issues in business approvals) to tackle following Rebate requirement.
Background of issue:
User has created credit memo because the logistic discount was not correctly invoiced.
However in this case the Rebate Accrual got reduced
Reason:
System must have thought that total amount of cases was returned physically and thatu2019s why rebate accruals are reduced).
This is not correct because the Materials are not returned. The materials are still with the customer. Hence the rebate accruals should not be reduced in this case. The credit note is only written because of price differences and not because of returns.
Example: to understand the issue better:
Suppose we have Invoice with 100 CV and an invoice value of 100 u20AC.
Rebate 1.) Shows an amount of 100 u20AC * 4% = 4 u20AC accruals
Rebate 2.) Shows an amount of 100 CV * 0,20 u20AC = 20 u20AC
Now we came to know that the 100 u20AC net invoice was wrong because of a wrong on-invoice discount. Hence the invoice should not be 100 u20AC, but 80 u20AC. However the 100 CV still remain (NO CHANGE IN QTY).
The credit note should affect the rebates in the following way:
Rebate 1.) Should show after the credit note: 80 u20AC * 4% = 3,20 e accruals
Rebate 2.) Remains 20 u20AC accruals (100 CV * 0,20 u20AC)
Requirement:
We want that whenever credit notes are issued which that just price related (e.g. wrong logistic discount) and which do not have a material movement, the Qty-related rebate conditions should not be affected in that invoice.
This requirement must have been used/tackled in all projects where rebate functionally is used.
If anybody has still some confusion in understanding the requirement please let me know so that I can discuss it over the phone.
With Regards,
Tushar Gawande

Hello,
actually the rebate basis can be updated for the quantity scale and/or value scale based on the document category assigned to the sales document type in customizing.
I mean that except if you configured differently, actually are used the standard program for rebate calculation and settlement. Using the standard, a key field is the document category of the document type in customizing (table TVAK field VBTYP).
For the below list of standard document category:
A Inquiry
B Quotation
C Order
D Item proposal
E Scheduling agreement
F Scheduling agreement with external service
G Contract
H Returns
I Order w/o charge
K Credit memo request
L Debit memo request
W Independent reqts plan
0 Master contract
For example, document type with document category C or H update both: quantity and value rebate basis; document type with document category K or L update only value rebate basis.
If I understand properly, in your case when the user adjust the price via credit note, once posted to accounting, the reflect in the R.A. was in both direction: update of both quantity and value.
Personal feeling is that the document type used to adjust the price was not correct and that this document type (as per customizing) is configured to reduce both: quantity and value.
Did you check the customizing of the document type used to adjust the wrong discount?
Which category did you find?
Regards,

Change of base value for calculation of Excise.

Hi All,
I have a senario which needs to be maaped in SAP. Please help in maaping the senario.
We are purchasing Oil from manufacturer like IOCL & HPCL. The contract is such that, the excise is calculated on the proce of the oil on the day the chalan has been created. Eg:-
Contract base price is 100
Ed@ 14.42% 14.42
But on the day of despatch the base price is 110, hence the excise will be calculated on 110 only not on 100.
So in PO we want to maintain a condition apart from basic price PBXX and PB00 on which only the excise will be calculated. The excise shouldnt be calculated on PBXX & PB00.
So please tell me how to map this in pricing procedure using routine.
Regards,
Mohar

Hi,
I hope your requirement can be met using the manual Excise condition - JEXC in MM Pricing Procedure by maintaining the subtotal as 5.
Enter the JEXC condition in PO Item condition manually & enter the amount on which excise needs to be calculated.
Based on subtotal 5 the value will flow to tax procedure automatically & excise will be calculated on the same.
Hope its clear.
Thanks & Regards,

CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM gives wrong values for Scess and HScess in PO Print

Dear Friends,
I am working with PO Print in smartforms hare the Fm CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM is gives wrong values for Scess and HEcess if I put the Gate pass (Basic Excise Duty) Manually.
And one more Issue is as if I check any line item condition taxes than imediatly when I see the print the all line items Scee and HEcess displays same which I have saw.
If there is a single line item in PO than there is no issue any way.
kindly suggest to resolve the issue.
Regards,
D Tarun Kumar

Hi,
I had the same issue, that taxes on invoice tab of PO was not printed correctly on PO form by calling CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
If you want to have the same tax value as komp-mwsbp, that use following form routine call before FB CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
perform j_1b_save_tax_fields(saplmepo) using ekko ekpo lfa1.
This is used in transaction me23n also.
Kind regards,
Tülay

MRP Based Excise

Dear All,
In our organization we have below billing process (MRP Based Excise).
Excise duty is calculated on MRP(-)30% Abatment.
Can any one help me how to configured the scinerio in a pricing procedure because the Excise is calculated on the base price.
Can anybody telll me how to map this.
Thanks in Advance.
Shobhit Gautam

HI
10 0 ZPR2 DOMESTIC-BASIC PRICE
40 0 ZMRP Domestic-MRP Price
60 0 ZABT Abatement% Discount 40
80 0 price after abt 40 60
85 0 Rebate Basis 10
90 0 BO03 Customer Rebate 85
130 0 ZEXC BASIC EXCISE DUTY 80 80
160 0 ZEC1 EDUCATION CESS 130
165 0 ZEIX SECONDARY & HR E-CES 130
170 0 total tax 130 165
200 0 ZAS2 Total Asesable Value 180 190
210 0 ZCST CST % 190
250 0 ZVAT VAT 190
380 0 ZROF ROUNDING OFF
390 0 grand total 190 380
440 0 VPRS Internal price
The above is the pricing procedure i too had the same scenario
ZPR2 will be the price to the customer
ZMRP will be the mrp price of teh material
ZABT is the condition type for abatement which is 30%
for this copy any discount condition and change them
dont forget to put as statistical for ZMRP condition type
regards
like the above create the pricing procedure

Wrong value of qty based excise condition in migo

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for