Wrong values for miro

Hi,
I am creating a PO through me21n.(Trader Scenario) where no excise value is calculated and Vat 4% for condition type JVRD is added to the base value and addtional tax of 1% with condition type JVCA is added to the base value.
When GR is created through MIGO excise tax is aded to the base value of PO and the total value now is PO base value + excise valve.
When the final receipt form MIRO is generated the total invoice value which is displayed shows the addition of 4% vat aaded to it , but 1% additional tax is not added to it.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks,
Siddhi

thank you so much..!! i check the table J_1IGRXREF as the per link suggested and found only half of the amount is updated there. i.e., 1367.00
Again i checked the table with the excise invoice number and found two entries of 1367.00 with two material document both those two material document has the same accounting document.
i..e,
material document 1 1367.00 accounting document 1
material documnt 2 1367.00 accounting document 1
however only one material document i can able to display in MIGO with 2734.00 when i display the other document it says document does not exist.
can i suggest to reverse the GRN and then to do it again ?

Similar Messages

CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM gives wrong values for Scess and HScess in PO Print

Dear Friends,
I am working with PO Print in smartforms hare the Fm CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM is gives wrong values for Scess and HEcess if I put the Gate pass (Basic Excise Duty) Manually.
And one more Issue is as if I check any line item condition taxes than imediatly when I see the print the all line items Scee and HEcess displays same which I have saw.
If there is a single line item in PO than there is no issue any way.
kindly suggest to resolve the issue.
Regards,
D Tarun Kumar

Hi,
I had the same issue, that taxes on invoice tab of PO was not printed correctly on PO form by calling CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
If you want to have the same tax value as komp-mwsbp, that use following form routine call before FB CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
perform j_1b_save_tax_fields(saplmepo) using ekko ekpo lfa1.
This is used in transaction me23n also.
Kind regards,
Tülay

Puzzle why query returned wrong value for last record in update.

Hi all,
10.2.0.4, Windows 32 bit.
Apply 15% dis.count to related 5 items ( total amount 522 ) sorted by lowest amount first (amount = 1).
Last record ( amount = 200 ) will be the total dis.count amount ( 78.3 ) less applied accumulated dis.count amount ( 48.50 ).
Query runs fine without update clause but wrong result for last record with update.
CREATE TABLE "T1"
    "ID"       NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
    "ITEM_ID" VARCHAR2(20 BYTE) NOT NULL ENABLE,
    "AMOUNT"   NUMBER(10,2) NOT NULL ENABLE,
    "dizcount" NUMBER(10,2)
INSERT INTO T1 ( ID, ITEM_ID, AMOUNT, dizcount ) VALUES ( 65, '101', 1, NULL ) ;
INSERT INTO T1 ( ID, ITEM_ID, AMOUNT, dizcount ) VALUES ( 65, '102', 1, NULL ) ;
INSERT INTO T1 ( ID, ITEM_ID, AMOUNT, dizcount ) VALUES ( 65, '201', 200, NULL ) ;
INSERT INTO T1 ( ID, ITEM_ID, AMOUNT, dizcount ) VALUES ( 65, '215', 155, NULL ) ;
INSERT INTO T1 ( ID, ITEM_ID, AMOUNT, dizcount ) VALUES ( 65, '111', 165, NULL ) ;
UPDATE t1 a
SET a.dizcount =
(SELECT
    CASE
      WHEN rec_count = row_count
      THEN (78.3 - NVL(lag(temp_total,1) over ( order by rec_count) ,0))-- 78.3 is total dizcount amount from 522 * .15
      ELSE disc_amt
    END amt
FROM
    (SELECT id,
      item_id,
      disc_amt,
      rec_count,
      row_count,
      CASE
        WHEN rec_count != row_count -- accumulate dizcount amount except for last record
        THEN SUM(disc_amt) over (order by rec_count)
        ELSE 0
      END temp_total
    FROM
      (SELECT ID ,
        item_id,
        amount amt,
        ROUND(amount * .15,1) disc_amt, -- dizcount is 15%
        row_number () over (order by amount) rec_count,
        COUNT ( *) over () row_count
      FROM t1
      WHERE ID = 65
    GROUP BY id,
      item_id,
      disc_amt,
      rec_count,
      row_count
    )b
WHERE a.item_id = b.item_id
);Regards
Zack
Edited by: Zack.L on Jul 26, 2010 1:26 AM

Zack.L wrote:
Query runs fine without update clause but wrong result for last record with update.Not sure why but looks like another case in favour of MERGE.
MERGE INTO T1
using (SELECT id, item_id,
    CASE
      WHEN rec_count = row_count
      THEN (78.3 - NVL(lag(temp_total,1) over ( order by rec_count) ,0))-- 78.3 is total dizcount amount from 522 * .15
      ELSE disc_amt
    END amt
FROM
    (SELECT id,
      item_id,
      disc_amt,
      rec_count,
      row_count,
      CASE
        WHEN rec_count != row_count -- accumulate dizcount amount except for last record
        THEN SUM(disc_amt) over (order by rec_count)
        ELSE 0
      END temp_total
    FROM
      (SELECT ID ,
        item_id,
        amount amt,
        ROUND(amount * .15,1) disc_amt, -- dizcount is 15%
        row_number () over (order by amount) rec_count,
        COUNT ( *) over () row_count
      FROM t1
      WHERE ID = 65
    GROUP BY id,
      item_id,
      disc_amt,
      rec_count,
      row_count
    ))b
on (t1.id = b.id and t1.item_id = b.item_id)
when matched then update set dizcount = b.amt ;This worked for me. I tested on 11.2 but should work on 10.2.0.4
SQL> select * from t1 order by amount ;
        ID ITEM_ID                  AMOUNT   DIZCOUNT
        65 101                           1         .2
        65 102                           1         .2
        65 215                         155       23.3
        65 111                         165       24.8
        65 201                         200       29.8p.s. BTW, not sure if you want the column names in different cases, but your script, as it is, gave me an error (on 11.2)

Need to raise an error if Users puts wrong value for date datatype in Forms

Hi all,
I've created a new form using Template.fmb in forms 10g having some text item with data type as DATE.
and now i wanted to raise an error if users inputs any wrong data rather than DATE format.
Please help me if anyone knows how to do this...

b_kapsy wrote:
As of now i am not looking for validation, i know the validation will automatically done but if you see by default it will not raise any error message if you fill any wrong value in text item with date data type. It will freeze the cursor to the text item.That is NOT the default. The default is to issue various FRM-nnnnn messages, between 50002 and 50026. From notes I have:
-- 50002: Month must be between 1 and 12.
-- 50003: Year must be 00-99 or 1000-4712
-- 50004: Day must be between 1 and last of month.
-- 50012: Date must be entered in a format like <fxMMDDRR>
-- 50017,18,19: Hour,Min,Sec must be between 0 and 23,59,59.
-- 50025: Date/time must be entered in a format like <xxyytttt>
-- 50026: same as 50012 and 50025 with <yyyy> year.
And from my old, dusty copy of the Oracle Developer/2000 "Messages and Codes Manual", those messages have an error level = 15.
If you are not seeing those messages, then you have done one of two things:
1. Set your System.Message_Level to a value of 15 or higher. You should NEVER set it above zero, since all that does is hides error messages like these. If you want to bypass or prevent an error message, it should be handled in the Re: FRM-40735:Pre_Insert trigger raised unhandled exception ORA-20011.
2. You have some bad code in an On-Error trigger that fails to handle errors correctly.

EPMWorkstatus() - Retrieving wrong values for status

Dear community,
I have a very special problem concerning the EPMWorkstatus() formula within the EPM-Client. This issue only appears on our quality ensurance system (QS) and productive system (PS), not on our development System (DS).
------ Setup is as follows:
workstatus is defined for three dimensions:
project (user defined dimension with owner attribute)
the project itsself is always a node
there is only one level of several workpackages below
measure/value (user defined dimension)
several Input values such as RF or budget etc.pp.
on node above them to organize all measures/values that are shown within the planning layout
time (time dimension)standard time dimension (years, quarters, months) with one adjustment
there is a top node ALL above all years
there is element NONE which is not in the hierarchy
All dimensions only have one hierarchy in use (PARENTH1)
------ Problem is as follows:
I have designed a workstatus report that shows the status for:
one workpackage
one month of the year (e.g.: 2015.01) as representative for the status of the whole year, because the controllers only enter data on year level which will be disaggregated by a code fragment
one measure / value
The EPMWorkstatus formula looks is embedded in an Excel formula which does some checks but the EPM part looks like that:
EPMWorkstatus(,0,EPMMemberID(cell-for-project-reference),EPMMemberID(cell-for-measure-reference),EPMMemberID(cell-for-time-refence))
Situation is now a follows:
I have a simple project with 3 workpackages. All of them have no explicit status, so they are in DEFAULT WORKSTATEon refresh the workstatus report shows empty cells which is perfectly fine
I chose one workpackage and open the workstatus Dialog
the project selection stays as it is (e.g. one workpackage)
for the measure / value dimension I chose one element or the node above those elements
for the time dimension I chose one year node or the top node ALL for all years
I set the status to "closed"
On refreshing the workstatus report all other workpackages seem to inherit the same status - so all formulas show the value "closed". Sometimes one element combination stays empty which would be the correct status.
The table which stores the workstatus looks fine (SE38 >> UJW_WS_TEST) and only has entries for the formerly selected workpackage.
The only way to get around this issue is to first set an explicit Status for the whole project to "open" and then do the same steps mentioned above. But this is no good solution because a master data update could bring new workpackages to the project.
Anyways I am trying to find out why it works on the DS and not on the QS / PS.
Could it a be a transportation problem? - As far as I checked via the web admin surface it looks the same on every System
The owner dimension project and the Attribute values for owner look the same on every system
It cannot be a client problem due to fact that we use one client version for all systems.
So where could I look where the problem comes from? Any help would be really appreciated.
Cheers,
Gernot

Hi Dinesh,
thank you for your reply. The results are as follows (please see the picture):
the development system seems to have another status ID for "open" and "closed" than the quality and productive system
but if I set a workpackage status to "closed" (e.g. "gesperrt" in screenshot) it seems to be consistent within the workstatus table as you can see in the screenshot
So I am not sure why that would have an impact on the workstatus...
Cheers,
Gernot

Getting wrong values for decimal value in Bex report

Hi,
 I am getting some problem in Bexreport decimal values.
 In ODS i am able to look the values for this key figure
(Total PO Release Val)= 140.692,00,the same value in Bex report looks like this $ 140,692.00.
 Here one calculation is going with these above values
 % Used = 'Total PO Release Val' / 'Target Value' * 100
 as per ODS value calculation it is correct = 140.692/1000 * 100 =14.692
 as per Bex it is coming like this = 140,692.00/1000 *100 = 142.692.
 in Bex report Percentage valus is not considering value is taking as 140,692.00 rather than 140.692.I mean to say decemal values are ignoring while calculation in Bexreport.can you any please advice me how to comeout of this problem.Appreciate your help.
Regards
Ramesh

 "(Total PO Release Val)= 140.692,00,the same value in Bex report looks like this $ 140,692.00."

How do you check the ODS value? The amount will only have two decimal places after it, so you can't have a value like 140.692,00. It seems to be an issue of user's decimal notation (where decimal is represented by comma, and thousand seperator by '.'). Go to user profile, change this setting (in default tab) to correct one (ie decimal being represented by '.') and login again and check it. The value that you see in ODS is 'one hundred forty thousand six hundred ninety two, the same that you get in Bex, only the representation is different).

0CO_PC_10 datasource extracting wrong values for company code

Hi,
I am extracting data from the datasource 0CO_PC_10 product cost analysis and found that Company code values are wrong in the extractor checker. Company code field is taking values of Plant. For example:
if company code 6100 has got plants 6101 6102 6104, ideallly all the rows should have company code value as 6100, instead
it is taking 6101 6102 6104 which are nothing but plant values. So in both columns I am getting same values.
Is this behaviour normal for this datasource?
I have tried to check help.sap on this data source in the below link, it says company code value is extracted from AUFK table but it is not happened.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_tm70/helpdata/en/9d/c31a8cee714393b1c75eb3e8f32a64/frameset.htm
Please suggest ideas to overcome this problem.
Regards
Sreekanth S

Hi,
Raise a SAP message there must be some problem with the Extraction logic use.
Also, in the meantime you can try debugging the program used to extract the data.
Regards,
Rahul

Wrong values for Total stock - Inventory managment ( negative values)

Hi,
I loaded inventory management load
2LIS_03_BF INIT 01.06.2009 - 06.7.2009 No Marker Update (compressed with check)
2LIS_03_UM INIT 01.06.2009 - 06.7.2009 No Marker Update (compressed with check)
the first quantity received is from 11.06.2009 and 0RECTOTSTCK is showing 300 which is correct.
on 10.06.2009 it is showing -300 for 0TOTALSTCK when it should be 0 since there hasn't been any data.
whats the right way to compress my cube if I don't want to load BX and how can I resolve this.
thanks

Hi,
The standard process to get correct values in report is
1. First u have to do init laod from 2LIS_03_BX and u have to compress the request with 'no marker update' chk box unselected.
2. Next u have to do init load from 2LIS_03_BF and u have to compress the request with 'no marker update' chk box selected.
3. Next u have to do init load from 2LIS_03_UM and u have to compress the request with 'no marker update' chk box selected.
4. Normally u can run delta loads from BX and BF data sources. ( Compression is not mandatory. Even if u compress it will improve the performance)
Regards,
Thilak

Formula is showing wrong values for dates

Hi i have document date and clear date
number of days is clear date -doc date
my doc date : 10/28/2008
my clear date : 11/24/2008
i have create 2 formula variabes ( at columns i want bring my characters)
nexti have written formula ( variable for clear date- variable for doc date)
but this variable are shwoing data format like
c1 (variable for clear date) : 20,081,124
c2 ( variable for doc date) : 20,081,028
formula c1-c2 is shwoing 96 days actaully original date format (11/24/2008-10/28/2008) i will get less than 30 days.
please let me know how to solve this issues

Hi Suneel,
I m giving you the detailed steps here so as to clear any doubts...
1. In the new formula window right click on Formula Variable and choose New Variable
2. Enter the Variable Name, Description and select Replacement Path in the Processing by field.
Click the Next Button
3. In the Characteristic screen, select the date characteristic that represents the first date to use in the calculation
4. In the Replacement Path screen select Key in the Replace Variable with field. Leave all the other options as they are (The offset values will be set automatically).
5. In the Currencies and Units screen select Date as the Dimension ID
Repeat the same steps to create a formula variable for second date and use them in the calculation.
Follow these steps and your problem will be solved for sure.
Regards,
Yogesh

HFM 11.1.1.3 ICP Report showing wrong value for Entity Currency Total

Here is the situation.
There are transactions on a ICP account (Entity Currency) 3.305.080
A journal is posted to the same account with the same POV. 307.205
When I run my ICP report on Entity currency i get the correct figure. 3.305.080
When I rum my ICP report on Entity Currency Total I get a wrong figure 307.205 (Equalt Entity Currency Adjustment) where it should have been 3.612.285
Any clues anybody?

There is no limit. In reality there has not been a limit to the volume of data in a single subcube since paging was added in the 4.0 release. Certainly since 64 bit HFM was introduced there really is no limit to the amount of data in a subcube, or the database for that matter.
Now that I've said that, 850,000 records in a single subcube is a lot of data. Prior to 4.0, the development team added an warning message when a subcube exceeded 100,000 records, but this was purely informational. You should still heed the notice. Most applications have a largest-cube size somewhere between 35,000 and 100,000 records (the top entity usually). While I've seen as many as a million records, you may experience performance problems at that point. Make sure you give the database and HFM app servers a lot of memory to handle this.
Since HFM 11.1.2.2 with its configurable dimensions, data can be spread across many more intersections. In your example you have seven custom dimensions, so I can understand how you might have a normal amount of data in each base entity (a few hundred to maybe a couple thousand), but balloon to hundreds of thousands when you get to the top entity. HFM can process a lot of data very quickly, but be careful if you have rules that cycle through all those intersections, such as allocations or maybe cash flow by product.
But there is no hard limit in HFM.

Stage.stageHeight gave wrong value for iPhone 5.

Hi All,
We tested our existing applications on iphone 5, and found out that the stage.StageHeight is still given the iphone 4 value 960 instead of 1136.
Our existing application was built in FB4.6/Air3.1.
Is there any workaround for this issue.
Thanks in advance.

In order to target iPhone 5 you need to use AIR 3.5 beta or AIR 3.4
pointing to iOS 6 SDK. Be sure to include the [email protected] to
trigger the iPhone 5 size. In other words, the app has to be built
targeting the iOS 6 SDK and have the new default png to trigger the full
size on the iPhone 5.
AIR 3.5 beta includes the bits that to target iOS 6 SDK, but you can
target iOS 6 with AIR 3.4 by using the external SDK path in the package
ANE prompt in FB 4.6
http://labs.adobe.com
iBrent

Wrong value for cursor%notfound while using bulk collect

Hi,
If the limit value is greater then the amount of rows which were fetched, then cursor attribute %NOTFOUND is TRUE.
Why it's not FALSE because one value was fetched.
I made a little example.
The second procedure doesn't produce an output, but the first one does.
SQL> CREATE TABLE testing AS SELECT 1 id FROM dual;
Table created.
SQL> DECLARE
2 TYPE array IS TABLE OF testing.id%TYPE;
3 l_data array;
4
5 CURSOR cur_test IS
6 SELECT id FROM testing;
7 BEGIN
8 OPEN cur_test;
9 LOOP
10 FETCH cur_test BULK COLLECT INTO l_data LIMIT 1;
11 EXIT WHEN cur_test%NOTFOUND;
12 dbms_output.put_line('value='||l_data(1));
13 END LOOP;
14 CLOSE cur_test;
15 END;
16 /
value=1
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> DECLARE
2 TYPE array IS TABLE OF testing.id%TYPE;
3 l_data array;
4
5 CURSOR cur_test IS
6 SELECT id FROM testing;
7 BEGIN
8 OPEN cur_test;
9 LOOP
10 FETCH cur_test BULK COLLECT INTO l_data LIMIT 10;
11 EXIT when cur_test%NOTFOUND;
12 dbms_output.put_line('value='||l_data(1));
13 END LOOP;
14 CLOSE cur_test;
15 END;
16 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> spool off;
Thanks
Ants

Why not bulk fetching only one time and not loop?
I would say it is working as intended. %FOUND / %NOTFOUND only tells you if there are rows left to fetch. Good that you are now aware of it.
Also think at possibilities like .FIRST, .LAST or SQL%BULK_ROWCOUNT
From the oracle documentation: "%NOTFOUND Attribute
This is a cursor attribute that can be appended to the name of a cursor or cursor variable. Before the first fetch from an open cursor, cursor_name%NOTFOUND yields NULL. Thereafter, it yields FALSE if the last fetch returned a row, or TRUE if the last fetch failed to return a row."

Wrong SNMP values for ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatus

Hello everyone,
we are facing the following issue: the SNMP poll is showing wrong values for ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatus when at the same time the "show env all" shows that there is nothing wrong with the power supplies.
Here is the example:
ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatusDescr.1057 Sw1, PS1 Faulty, RPS NotExist OctetString 192.168.49.28:161
ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatusDescr.1058 Sw1, PS2 Faulty, RPS NotExist OctetString 192.168.49.28:161
ciscoEnvMonSupplyState.1057 notFunctioning (6) Integer 192.168.49.28:161
ciscoEnvMonSupplyState.1058 notFunctioning (6) Integer 192.168.49.28:161
------------------ show env all ------------------
FAN 1 is OK
FAN 2 is OK
FAN PS-1 is OK
FAN PS-2 is OK
SYSTEM TEMPERATURE is OK
System Temperature Value: 31 Degree Celsius
System Temperature State: GREEN
Yellow Threshold : 46 Degree Celsius
Red Threshold : 60 Degree Celsius
SW PID Serial# Status Sys Pwr PoE Pwr Watts
1A C3KX-PWR-350WAC AZS161803GQ OK Good Good 350/0
1B C3KX-PWR-350WAC AZS161803GT OK Good Good 350/0
I have seen that this is a more or less a known issue and there are plenty of bugs for it, but exactly for our hardware and IOS (C3560E Software (C3560E-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0(2)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)) I cannot find any exact information.
Please, advice if we are hitting some known bug which I cannot locate.
Thanks,
Vesselin
SW Status RPS Name RPS Serial# RPS Port#
1 Not Present <>

Hi ,
I have issue while generating alerts for the CISO nexus device.
snmp laert tool: Solarwinds error : The OID is not supported,
Can anyone tell me the OID for the CISCO nexus 2k, 5K devices.
I am trying to generate the Temp alert.
THANKS

Full Points sure: Wrong values populating in report (BEX)

Hi Gurus,
I got an Issue on CRM Report. Report is populating wrong values.
In the report, We have structure called Opportunity (in that structure fields are New opportunity, Close opportunity, Win opportunity and Open opportunity) in query and One key figure called Revenue.
On revenue we have one condition with variables. But, in that condition everything is fine.
The Condition Screen is like this:
Radio Button: Single characteristic is selected
"Opportunity Sales ID" selected in Characteristics.
Keyfigures:
Revenue                      New Opp                      TOP N             TOP X OPP
Revenue                      Open Opp                     TOP N             TOP X OPP
Revenue                      WINS                           TOP N             TOP X OPP
Revenue                      Lost                             TOP N              TOP X OPP
everything is right in this: If we select top 10 opportunities. we are getting wrong values
for ex: if we select top 10 Opportunities (in the selection screen) means REVENUES.
We are getting 12 values. 10 values are correct remaining 2 values are wrong..
There is no Update routine for revenue keyfield.
Can please suggest me on this What are possibilities for wrong values ...
FULL POINTS SURE FOR THIS
THANKS,
KN

Hi All,
Can anybody answer... this...
thanks,
KR

Updated CODE1 is showing wrong values in 2LIS_05_QE1

Hi all,
I'm using 2LIS_05_QE1 extractor to report over qualitative data in BW. When the code of the characteristics is updated, the extractor takes 2 records, before and after images. The extractor is gathering wrong values for the CODE1 field in the before image.
REQUEST     DATAPAKID     RECORD     ROCANCEL     PPLNKN     MERKNR     CODE1     GRUPPE1     ZHLNSTAT
REQU_4KVR0APSV0RSZ7N70IOR0F95L     1     5120          5     40     0     CIBAU038     1
REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9             3     4045     X     5     40     0     CIBAU038     -1
REQU_4KPIA4UG5G1IKN6DE3XFWKIS9             3     4046          5     40     75     CIBAU038     1
REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9     3     4045     X     5     40     0     CIBAU038     -1
REQU_4KYF8YNIEMXNZI7P2Y5BM21W9     3     4046          5     40     75     CIBAU038     1
We have changed the characteristic two times, now we can see two of the before images with the ROCANCEL field marked with = 'X'. The problem appears in the second before image which is not taking the actual value of the CODE1 field (75), instead is showing the value in zero. Then, when I report over the key figure in the table above ZHLNSTAT (quantity of values) the results are showing 2 values for CODE1=75 and -1 values for CODE1=0.
Any ideas?

I have checked Datasource and CODE1 is not a hidden field...apart from this field there are other fields too which I can see in Datasource in R/3 about dont see them in BW ....
Please let me know what could be wrong.
Thanks,
Murtuza.
Edited by: Murtuza Morwala on Jun 27, 2009 7:36 AM

Wrong values for miro

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for