Graphics render bug in FCP 6 and 7 - Dare to prove me wrong?

I have an issue with an HD video that contains red and purple text and graphics in the edit. I've looked for an answer tirelessly online, with friends, and through trial and error for a good 7 hours before giving up. Here's the deal,
Sequence settings: HD 1440x1080 16:9, 23.98, HDV 1080p24 for editing the canon7d footage that came in - this however doesn't matter because i tested with every setting imaginable including animation raw and ended up with the same results for the graphics problem I'm having (kind of unrelated to the actual footage).
I need to output this 9 minute edit I have to an HD file 1280x720 for youtube upload. So, it has to be under 2gb (youtube's limit) but for client purposes, it needs to be crisp and great looking as you would imagine.
I have a bunch of PSDs, each show a different line drawing of a brush. For each one, the line is a different color. For any of the colors that aren't red or purple, they render crisp and wonderful in final cut pro over top the video. However, the graphics that have the lines that are red or purple, come out pixelated and blurry no matter how i try to render them. The only solution that worked was to render and output them with the animation codec. ProRes HQ worked too but not as well. However, this makes a file way too big. Whenever I went from animation to h264 or from FCP to h264, or any other web friendly format, graphics come out way pixelated. It makes me frustrated as to why all the graphics that were exactly the same except not red or purple came out perfectly crisp. Also, why is animation codec the only codec out there (besides uncompressed obviously) that will create clean edges in these red/purple graphics?
Conclusion: Found that reds and purples are the only colors that seem to be effected when rendering the graphics. Everything else comes out nicely. Animation and pro res codecs aside, any codec making the video small enough for the web (less than 2gb) resulted in the problem of pixelation with the red and purple graphics. Based on extensive research I did online, I was surprised not to find many people posting about the exact same problem. For the issues I did find that seemed related, people concurred that HD nor regular DV video do a good job rendering bright reds or variations of red. Because I found no solutions online or from all the things I tried in the list below
-re-rendered the PSD's in Final cut pro with variation of sequence setting to see if that would make any difference - it didn't. Tried all kinds of different settings in export for h264, keyframes, max quality, etc. no luck.
-tried rendering to "Animation/uncompressed" as far through the process as possible. For instance, I outputted a perfectly crisp "Animation" file that was perfect looking. As soon as I re-exported to h264, mpeg4, or sorenson, or any other codec dropping the file size down, all results returned pixelated results for the reds and purple graphics.
-made sure photoshop settings were all good, even copied and pasted psd into new 1920x1080 project, played with DPI up to 300 to see if it did anything, saved as different formats TIFF, png, eps, layers, flattened, 8-bit, 24-bit, 36-bit, etc., none of the formats worked correctly.
-outputted my own purple and red graphics and text and rendered in final cut to see if the file had anything to do with it. same problem with my red and purple graphics and text.
-Tried adding slight moving grain to the graphic in Final cut to try and trick FCP to thinking it was a video instead of a graphic and therefore render it smoothly.
-consulted with 2 other video editors/media experts, ended up frustrating them as well (and hurting their ego a little since they were sure they could figure it out)
-Ran the shot and graphic through after effects and premiere pro separately (different video programs) to see if final cut pro was causing the problem, same problem with those programs.
-tried rendering on a different mac, still the same.
-Actually upgraded my final cut pro version to the new version (now Final cut studio 3). Ran tests on new version of final cut pro, same exact problem.
-added black edge to purple graphics to see if that did anything different to the rendering. Didn't help
-Changed the hue of the graphic to anything other than red or purple. Wouldn't you know...That fixed it.
Here is a link to the Animation Output of a half second of the edit with a sample red graphic crisp as can be for you to test (12.7mb) -
http://www.robinsonhope.com/downloads/makeup_animationtest.zip
Here is a link to view screenshots before and after to show you what rendering does to the graphics.
http://www.robinsonhope.com/downloads/makeup_ss.jpg
In case you'd like to try and find a solution, please download the link to the HD animation half-second clip and output to h264 or any other web friendly codec that would show these red graphics clean and not blurry and pixelated. Other rule is after doing the math, a 9 minute video with the compression you choose would need to be under 2gb. This shouldn't be too much of a problem because even a 1280x720 h264 at max quality for a 9min video is still under 2gb.
The first person to show me that you are truly a FCP guru and can solve this, post a link of your successful solution, I will praise you as genius all over this forum. I will also be eternally grateful. Live in LA? I'll also buy you dinner, Haha. But seriously...

Welcome to this forum,
Sorry to hear you so struggling with this issue.
And I doubt whether I can solve this for you, but I can say a few things.
The title of this thread is:
Graphics render bug in FCP 6 and 7 - Dare to prove me wrong?
I'll prove you are wrong. Or actually you've already proved yourself wrong in your post:
-Ran the shot and graphic through after effects and premiere pro separately (different video programs) to see if final cut pro was causing the problem, same problem with those programs.
Seams that I try to annoy you, but I'm not. It's not a joke. The fact that other applications can't handle it as well AND the fact that Animation Codec (Which is pretty lostless) does not have this problem, tells you that the problem is likely the low compression you want OR the footage itself. And I dare say it's BOTH.
I downloaded your testfile and have opened it in FCP and I can see in the Vectorscope that your color Red is too hot.
[Click here|http://i843.photobucket.com/albums/zz356/rienkL/Screenshot2010-04-02at1324 20.png] to see the vectorscope of your picture?
You also see the small boxes (clockwise)
Red, Magenta, Blue, Cyan, Green, Yellow. The signal of your picture should stay somewhere between those boxes. You should read [this article|http://www.larryjordan.biz/articles/lj_scopes.html] (two third on the page) about the vectorscope. Also has a picture with the range to be broadcast safe.
So back to your picture and your vectorscope. You'll see that just along the right side of the R in the vectorscope there's a peak which goes way out of the range. And that's exactly the color of your graphic.
I tried isolating that color, reducing the saturation, and then do an export, but that failed. You should adjust that within the PSD's first and then see how exporting goes.
So now you are thinking: My client wants his own colors! Sure he does. But those colors were probably designed for print, which does have another colorrange. Simple technical story. You're bound to specific saturation. Going over that means troubles....
And I'm not claiming that your problem will be solved when you adjust this. It is still possible that h264 just doesn't like red too much. Maybe that's on purpose. Our eyes are most less sensitive to red, so that gives the compressor some extra room to compress in the reds (Don't know if this is what compression developers do; just thinking out loud, just an idea...)
Hope this helps at least a little.
Rienk

Similar Messages

  • Render time between fcp and motion

    I make my own project in motion 3, this project is something like a slideshow but I used a new camera, a light, and the images (png files) in a 3d way. the number of media in the scene is always low, one ore two without filters too. Anyway, when I export the animation directly from motion to a .mov file I obtain a render time very quick, but if I import my motion project in fcp I can't work with this; just the visualization time is prohibitive! than when I export through compressor or directly from fcp tha application crash!
    so my question is what elements fcp doesn't like? light? camera? 3d elements?
    this time I solved the problem exporting my clip from motion like file.mov but I only move the problem... I cant't archive my project, it's to big!
    thank you
    G5   Mac OS X (10.4)   8 GB RAM

    In my experience, these problems are more likely to crop up when using oversized images. Especially those greater than 2k or 4k (depending on your card). Motion gets a larger "workspace" on its own than when invoked to render from within FCP or Compressor...
    Patrick

  • Copy and Paste bugged in FCP 7??

    Is anyone else having problems with copying from one seq to another?
    Everytime i paste an item into my main seq it changes the name of my seq to the pasted item.
    Its doesnt stop me working just quite confusing and annoying..

    Thanks the the suggestion, already had trashed the prefs.
    Description of workflow is easy.
    Load two seqs. (say seq 1 and seq 2)
    1.copy a clip (lets say, named 'clip 1') using 'apple c' from seq 2
    2.paste into seq 1 using 'apple/shift p' (or from edit menu) into seq 1
    seq 1 is now named 'clip 1'
    this has only happened since upgrade to FCP 7, it didnt happen in 6.0.5.
    OS reinstalled 2 months ago and updated to 10.5.6 and fresh install of 6 updated from start to 6.0.5
    then updated monday to FCP 7.
    If no one else has this problem, then i will do another os reinstall and a clean install of 7.
    Such a odd bug had to post.
    Thanks
    new features are great and i expected to hit a few bugs as FCP 7 is hot off the presses

  • Is it possible to render the clips individually and relink- such as with Color/fcp?

    I'm fairly new to Ae/ PP, and am trying to figure out a good workflow for grading (using resolve lite) Basically, I need to denoise my footage first (neat video) and then send that footage to Resolve, then back to pp. Now, this works fine with Resolve's scene detector as it can cut up the footage, but if there are any dissolves, etc, then I need to do this via xml instead.
    What I would like to do is: Edit in PP. Send to AE to denoise, render (the denoise need to happen before grading) and replace the original files with the new denoised clips in pp. Then send the xml to Resolve. So far this would work if it wasn't for AE rendering everything into one clip, eliminating the cuts/layers.
    Is it possible to render the clips individually and relink- such as with Color/fcp? If not, any other workflow that could work for me?
    Hope someone can help- dynamic link is driving me up the wall.

    Simply use Dynamic Link to send your whole timeline to AE or use AE's Premiere project import. Then once you have a working AE project, you can use scripts like rdPreCompose to create separate sub-comps for each clip which in turn you then can render separately. Still, the limitation will always be the kind of transitions you use. Essentialyl you should avoid anything that isn't a hard cut or simple cross dissolve 'cos there's no way to recreate it in AE without eating up the handle of your footage. You'd essentialyl be shooting yourself in teh foot if you jump ahead too far in Premiere and already add too much finishing there.
    Mylenium

  • Rendering in FCP: I render, close FCP, and have to render again

    Hello all,
    Maybe this is a question which many of you will find easy to answer, but I do not understand why after rendering portions of my timeline that do need rendering, it plays fine, but if I close FCP and restart it later it needs to render those portions again...
    Is there something I am doing wrong when I render? I usually select the clips that need rendering and choose "render only" and "clips that need render".
    Thanks.

    check the trash for your lost rendered files. If they are there, your Render manager is deleting them prematurely.
    If they're not in the trash, they should still be in your Render folder.
    You can debug this (but not necessarily fix it), with some tedium, by opening the render folder and sorting by date. Render the project and note the new filenames, maybe label them red or blue. Close the project, open it. Are the files gone?
    bogiesan

  • Apple - PLEASE fix the graphical bug with Dock and Stacks! PLEASE!

    Using popular Mac games such as Diablo II, Freeverse's Wingnuts, Ambrosia's Aperion, and Blitwise's Super DX-Ball (as well as a LOT more) results in a common graphical glitch with the Dock and stacks, making fan stacks totally useless until I restart my iMac. Killing and relaunching the Dock doesn't fix it. Only restarting my Mac temporarily sorts it out. This is a highly annoying bug most often set off by games that Apple STILL hasn't fixed as of 10.5.3. So I let every developer (who I do not blame, BTW) know whose product results in this bug, in the hope they will apply pressure to Apple. Leopard has been the buggiest release since 10.1 IME and Apple is taking there sweet time about crushing such crippling bugs. Suffice to say it's really ******* me off.
    Here is a screenshot from another 24" iMac afflicted by this bug after running a game:
    <http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/5324/corrupteddockandmenuletpk1.png>
    Notice the open stack is just grey bars. The icons and names are not
    showing.
    Regards,
    Jamie Kahn Genet

    Hi Wizardling
    These forums are User to User technical forums Apple employees do not often read these forums. You can do 1 of two things.
    1. Send feedback to Apple via http://www.apple.com/feedback or
    2. Sign up for a free developer account and open a bug report with Apple through http://bugreporter.apple.com
    Hope this helps
    J.C

  • Is there any bugs about flip4mac and fcp studio ....

    is there any conflicts between fcp studio and flip4mac ......

    I haven't seen any bugs at all, but for final conversions I tend to export out a self contained, close fcp and convert from QT pro. It seems to encode a little faster that way. For finals, I always use 2pass vbr.
    I export right out of fcp for quickie content approvals, they tend to be low bit-rate one-off's to e-mail to my clients.

  • Good Graphics Render Poorly

    First time poster here...i've searched the threads but have been unable to find an answer to my question.
    Basically, ever since I updated to Final Cut Pro HD (V5.0.3 - I had 4.5 before) evertime I import a graphic and drop it into a dv timeline, it looks fine until I render it. This even happens when I use Final Cut's title tool. When I render, the graphic looks distorted (like if you too a very low-res file, which is not the case.) I'm viewing through an AJA i/o box (component) on a professional sony CRT monitor and on the lcd computer monitor. This is not a monitoring issue. If i render the graphics in an 8-bit sequence, it's beautiful. Unfortunately I can't always do this due to drive space. This was never an issue in 4.5 so why now?
    any help would be much appreciated!
    thanks

    When you import the graphic...it is at the full resolution that graphic is. All FCP does is make a pointer to that clip. So when you drop it in the DV timeline, it needs to be rendered to playback in the DV codec, so it creates a render file that is DV.
    When you drop that same clip into an 8-bit timeline, it loses the connection to the DV clip and wants you to re-render. When you do, it looks at the source file and now renders it in the 8-bit colorspace....and therefore looks MUCH better.
    And yes, edit in a DV timeline until you are done, then go 8-Bit for the final.
    As for the 4.5 and 5 thing...this has happened to me since I started with FCP 3, so it is nothing new. How it didn't look like this before...couldn't say.
    Shane

  • Optimizing FCP and the studio

    Hello,
    I am a user of FCP and the rest of the Studio, but I only use the "consumer" version. I use it for professional purposes ( I work for PCTV) and I wanted to know if anyone who uses this stuff professionally has any advice on how to make the system more powerful and usable. I find it hard to believe that Peter Jackson's crew had to wait 14 hours to render and compress a few minutes worth of graphics or compositions. What do I need to buy to make the system faster and more capable? Any advice is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Matt

    http://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/newpage_wrapper.cgi?forumid=1&page=http://www.creativecow.net/magazine/cowmagsubscribe.html
    Go to the Cow and sign up for the newsletter. Jerry Hoffman just wrote a good article describing how to keep a rock solid system running rock solid.
    -BTW Jerry if you see this- Great article man!

  • A BUG in FCP 7: Multiclip Markers slip when copied from project to project

    Alas, not all things are great with multiclip markers in FCP 7.
    We are shooting multicam on a show with dual system sound. Individual camera angles are synced to the production sound (broadcast .wav) and merged to create new master clips that use the stereo production audio instead of the original camera audio, then the new synced/merged clips are made into multiclips using In points set on the slate claps as the multiclip synchronization method. Markers added to the A angle and B angle do indeed stay attached when added in the viewer (thanks for that bug fix, Apple). The assistants are marking the beginning of each take and all resets on each angle, so that both Angle 1 (A camera) and Angle 2 (B camera) have the exact same markers on the exact same frames.
    Problem is, when the editor opens the dailies project and copies the bins with the marked multiclips into his editor project, or his or her version of the dailies project is updated, the markers on Angle 2 (B camera) all shift in time (like they were all slipped). All Angle 2 markers in each individual clip slip the same amount, but every multiclip's markers slip a different amount. Copying clips from one bin to another IN THE SAME PROJECT yields the same slippage, and what's more, even messes up the markers in the original master multiclips (as if the copies were not affiliates but literally the same master clip as the multiclips). To make matters even worse, sometimes it's the A camera (Angle 1) that has markers slipping.
    This bug does not affect multiclips that are made from the clips using original camera audio. Since the production has, thus far, been unable to properly jam sync the audio and camera timecode, each merged audio multiclip can have, potentially, three different timecode numbers associated with each track, Angle 1, Angle 2 and the stereo audio. Clearly FCP has no idea what to do when it attempts to recreate the clips in another bin or project, but the offset (i.e. how much the markers slip) is not directly correlated to any timecode offset between the different tracks of the multiclip. How weird is that?
    It's forcing the editors to mark their own footage, which is really the assistant's job. At least in FCP 6 you could mark the original angles prior to multiclipping and the markers would stay as you switched angles, or you could mark the original angles and then replace the angle in the multiclip with the marked angle and, again, the markers would stay affixed to the angle when you switched from angle to angle. Now that doesn't even work.
    Help!
    Any workaround out there?

    Actually the 4:2:2 smoother is for prepping footage in a 4:2:2 color space for chroma keying (it prevents stairstepping due to the blocky chroma values). It is the right setting for DVCPRO HD.
    Sure about that? because it already is in a 4:2:2 color space, and there are no stair steps. Only DV has those ugly stair steps. I believe this is for DV. I have never used it, and I have comped a lot of DVCPRO HD.
    am using the Chroma Keyer filter from FCP (possibly derived from Primatte?
    Nope...Primatte is a NEW filter in FCP 7. The built in Chroma Keyer in FCP downright *****. I use DV Matte Pro for simple stuff in FCP, and Primatte or Keylight for the more complex ones, and in AE or Motion. But Primatte is now in FCP 7...well, a "lite" version called Primatte RT.
    If chroma smoothing is causing that issue...don't use it.
    Shane

  • Is there a deus ex maquina for the hashed over HDV- DV conversion issues in the temples of FCP and Compressor??

    I want to create a good quality SD DVD  from 1080i/60 footage (20 minutes duration) from a Sony ZiU camera (mini DV tape) using FCP and Compressor. I can't do it. My hair has fallen out, but I don't want to throw in the towel.
    I have imported the same footage with different FCP presets. The video quality in FCP is excellent.
    But once I send the footage to Compressor. I end up with video exhibiting gradations of the following: blurry, jagged edges, jerky movement, darker color. Poor quality especially if a subject (kids playing football) runs fast.
    The QT conversion process in Ken Stone’s article (May, 2008/updated in Jan, 2011) provides the most helpful information in getting a quality SD DVD. (Quality means looking as good as SD video DVDs).  Except for the fact that the DVD is widescreen, the better quality alternative may just be to stick with the old 4:3 shooting, editing, burning methods that I’ve used for years. Unless of course, I  am missing something. Hence my appeal to the knowledgable.
    FYI Equipment/software: MAC Pro (OS 10.6.8); ATI Radeon HD 4870; terabytes to spare on 2 internal hard drives; FCS - FCP 7.0.3, Compressor 3.5.3, DVDSP 4.2.2. All applications are on Drive 1. FCP project files, scratch and other setups are on drive 2.
    My current settings in FCP appear below. What's wrong here? Better alternative? Or it just may be HDV should not go to a SD DVD.
    CAPTURE PRESET:  HDV - APPLE PRORES 422
    DEVICE CONTROL PRESET:  Sony HDV FireWire
    VIDEO PROCESSING Render 10-bit material in high precion YUV
    I now send the Sequence to Compressor  I've tried various settings, and the split screen preview in Compressor reveals on the right side the jaggy, blurred, darker video. Same shows up after submitting; and of course if I try to burn a DVD in DVDSP.  I've followed Stone's Aug 31, 2009 article on Compressor 3.5. I experiemented with changes here and there without success (like changing field dominance of even selecting DV NTSC, etc).
    If you got this far, thank you. And I really could use the help.
    Sorry.Presets: Apple Pro Res 422 1440x1080 60i 48 kHz, HDV- Apple ProRes 422, Sony HDV FireWire. Capture Preset: HDV-Apple ProRes 422; Device control Sony HDV FireWire. Sequence Settings: 1440x1080 HD (1440X1080) (16:9), PIixel HD(1440x1080), Upper/Odd, 29.97, Compressor Apple ProRes 422.  Message was edited by: Richard Fera

    Michael,
    Thanks for the helpful comments. Two tactics today helped. Where ever field dominance was indicated I made sure "upper/top" was the same everywhere throughout  FCP and Compressor. That almost eliminated the jagged edges. Also, in the easy setup, I selected Apple ProRes 422 as the format, using HDV to ProRes HQ - Sony -1080i60. Sending direct to Compressor rather than through QuickTime conversion also help produce a clearer, less dark picture.
    I'll try your suggesstions especially adding compression markers. I'll check back with you on results.
    Thanks

  • My new 13 inch Macbook Pro and FCP and FCS 2

    Until today I thought I could not run FCP and FCS 2 Full Suite because of my graphics card in my base, stock, 13" Macbook Pro. -- I'm being told that my 9400M with 256 shared memory will run these applications. That's good news to me if it's true. What are some of your views from the Pro camp please. I can bring up the memory and hard drive. I just shoot and edit in Standard Definition with my Canon Optura 50 MINI DV Tapes and my Canon HV20 with the same.
    I realize I am on the low end but will it work?

    Some of it will, although you might not be happy with the performance of Motion and Color will probably not install at all.

  • Help with FCP and long project editing - Thanks!

    I have posted several questions in this discussion group and in the iMovie group to no avail. I get a lot of answers, but not from anyone who has actually done any of the editing I am seeking. So if anyone has actually done the editing I am describing below -- I appreciate your help. Yes, I have searched the archives -- but again, I see a lot of confusing feedback. I have been working on this for three days now and it's driving me crazy! I have discovered that iMoive is $#@% -- and does not work with a long project, (40 minutes) so I am thinking about switching to FCP-HD. Thanks.
    Here goes:
    1: I need to transfer original master footage, 1080i HDV from a Sony HDR-FX1 to an editing program, edit the tapes (over 5 hours total) into a 50 minute "program". I then need to "share" or export the footage back to a new tape, using the Sony HDR-FX1 as the receiving camera. Simple enough.
    2: I need to make sure the outgoing footage is of equal quality as the original footage taken from the camera. I am guessing here, that the footage can be edited in FCP-5 as "native" -- then transferred back to the Sony?
    3: I am assuming that the native footage is just that -- and will not require the long process of converting to another format, e.g., ASI that takes hours to
    render. (as in iMovie).
    4: I am assuming I can edit and view HDV as native footage in FCP in real time, like iMovie, via firewire from the camera?
    I really appreciate any assistance.
    Chance

    Welcome to the family, you'll be joining us soon.
    The FCP product page says: > It features powerful new multicamera editing, native HDV support, ... edit everything from DV and SD to DVCPRO HD and fully uncompressed 10-bit high-definition video. Or work with new formats like native HDV (long-GOP MPEG2) and 50Mbps IMX... HD editing requires a 1GHz or faster PowerPC G4 or G5 and 1GB of RAM (2GB recommended).<
    You seem to have the hardware including the Flux-o-pator, but, really, you want to talk to an Apple reseller who handles FCP and understands HDV via Sony. I don't like the way you're using "I am assuming..." You can't assume anything. Give them a chance to sell you FCP or Studio and go demo your camera on their system. You will have concrete evidence of the minimum machine specs and how well you can get your files in and out of the application.
    Call you local Mac user group and try to locate other FCP users.
    Try also the creativecow.net forums for Sony HD products.
    Google your camera model for support groups.
    bogiesan

  • How do I set-up my memory amount for max speed for FCP and Motion

    Hey all, I have a Dual 2.3 G5 with (8 Gigs) Ram. I'm working with a new client. I want to set up my memory or whatever else to provide MAXIMUM processing power for FCP and MOTION. Does anyone have any recommended settings. I've maxed-our RAM. My card is (ATI Radeon 9600-128MB of VRAM)
    Is there a setting in FCP that allows more processing power to be applied to that application ?
    Appreciate any replies

    Most of FCP's speed in performing functions is directly related to processor speed. The only way to increase performance would be to use a Mac with faster processors. Performance is also related to data throughput, so if you're working with high data rate video formats, a fast RAID and/or SATA (or eSATA) media storage solution would help.
    The exception to FCP performance is when rendering/processing FX Plugs; they are dependent on the power of the graphics card.
    Motion is mostly dependent on the power of the graphics card.
    There is no way that I'm aware of that you can speed up RAM. Having the extra RAM will just mean that you can successfully work with more applications open at the same time.
    -DH

  • Work Flow with FCP and color correction

    I am looking for a decent workflow between FCP and motion when I need to apply color correction to the clips.
    I have a goup of clips in FCP that I would like to send to motion, animate them and send them back to FCP. Problem is I want to use FCP for the color correction- nicer than motion's. The, all bad options I have come up with are:
    1. color correct in FCP and then send to Motion- will not work because filters are not applied in send.
    2. Export the clips as one QT self containned movie- I lose the clip partitioning.
    3. Exports individual clips to QT then into Motion- I lose the clip ordering
    4. Color correct after I get back into FCP from Motion- clip boundaries are lost making applying color correction harder.
    Any ideas?
    Rick

    I've done this two ways - both variations on the methods you have outlined. First and simplest and one I used last week on a PSP project was to apply the color correction to the Motion clip (.motn file) after it came back from Motion. This is simple and easy, but if you've done titling, you may not want to color correct that.
    The second is as you said to render and export a self contained movie, then import it and copy it onto the timeline above the original clip that produced it, thus (at least organizationally) maintaining a connection between them. I then send the quicktime to Motion.
    Sorry I cannot think of another better way of doing it...
    Patrick

Maybe you are looking for