Inbound delivery goods receipt

G'day All,
We have just implemented WMS and use both EDI and manual ASN's for Purchase Orders.
Pre WMS we would receipt the Inbound Delivery via MIGO and if the receipt amount is outside the Confirmation Control Key tolerance for KG's we would receive a message. ie "PU Ordered quantity exceeded by xxx KG".
Now we are using WMS and before we Goods Receipt, for each Inbound Delivery we also create an Inbound Transfer Order using VL06I For Putaway.
BUT now when we use VL06I (instead of MIGO) to confirm and Goods Receipt in ONE step by using For confirmatn.
For each inbound delivery we choose confirm in background and use option 2 in Adopt Putaway qty (Copy stock plcmt qty as deliv.qty into delivery and post GI).
The problem is we do NOT receive the error message we did in MIGO. The Inbound TO is confirmed but the GR fails but we dont know anything about it until we discover a negative amount in our interim GR Storage Type.
If we do it in two steps and use option 1 (Stock placement qty adopted into delivery as delivery qty) which confirms the TO first, then use For gds receipt we get the error message.
Can anyone help me with ideas on getting the message to display in VL06IC For confirmatn When we confirm the TO and GR in one step? We do not want to use the 2 step method as our Despatch department is already overworked and they will rebel and take the easy way out, leaving our inventory controllers with large headaches!
Thankyou
Luke
null

Hi
If you are carrying out a Put away against the inbound delivery first and confirming the TO the negative balance is normal as IM Does not know it has arrived yet.
Once the Put away is completed you need to go back to the inbound delivery and Post Goods receipt. This will show the stock in IM and remove the negative.
Reason
Because you are putting the stock away before you inform IM then the stock has to come from somewhere and as the movement type is 101 it creates a negative qty in 902. The post goods issue will post corresponding qty in 902 and cancel out the negative.
I hope that this helps

Similar Messages

EKES-DABMG error - Inbound delivery - good receipt

I have a big problem about inbound delivery (ID) ;
There are two ID for same purchase orders (PO1) item (POI1) and different delivery date .
      deliv. date   amount
ID1 ; 15.02.2007    10 pieces
ID2 ; 20.02.2007    25 pieces
When Goods Receipt take place for ID2 ( Migo - reference with inbound delivery ) ;
Table EKES ;
                ekes-dabmg
PO1 POI1 ID1 10
PO1 POI1 ID2 15
but I expect this one ;
                ekes-dabmg
PO1 POI1 ID1 0
PO1 POI1 ID2 25
Because I didn't do anything ( good issue ) for ID1 .
thanks a lot..

I solved this problem ; In table T163G , you must mark WEZUO field .
Customizing step ; MM - Purchasing - Confirmations - Set Up Confirmation Control

Inbound freight - Goods receipt before Shipment cost document

Hi,
We are in process of implementing Transportation module for capturing Inbound freight.
All our test cases passed except 2) mentioned below:
Operationally transactions sequence can happen in two ways:
1) Purchase Order -> Inbound delivery -> Shipment document ->Shipment Cost ->Goods receipt ->Invoice verification - Materials
> Invoice verification - Freight
2) Purchase Order -> Inbound delivery -> Goods receipt ->Shipment document -> Shipment Cost -> Invoice verification - Materials
> Invoice verification - Freight
In case 1 we are we are getting correct results as freight amount is getting added in material cost during MIGO as below
Inventory              Dr          (is sum of GR/IR and Frt Provision)
GR/IR                    Cr
Frt Provision         Cr
While in case 2) since MIGO is done prior to shipment document we are not able to get FI effects for freight cost. Hence Invoice booking is not possible for freight neither it is getting added into materials.
Results expected as below :
In case 1 , same as it is happening today.
In case 2, it should post freight provision at shipment cost document so that freight booking can be done.
        Inventory       Dr
        Frt Provision Cr
It will be of great help if anybody suggest solution on this.
Regards,
Swanandesh Rane

Hi Ilya,
A simple search term "Shipment cost document creation before PGI" and got the below thread which is exactly the same the only difference is for process GR and GI
May i ask you to go through with existing thread first and if your question is not answered please let us know
G/R mandatory before shipment cost....

Inbound delivery goods movement status.

Hi,
Goods receipt is posted against an inbound delivery. Goods movement status shows as completed (Status C) in VL33N transaction. However when I look at delivery status in the table VBUP it shows the goods movement status as A.
Does any one of you faced this issue. If faced what would be the root cause..?
Is there any OSS notes available to correct this issue..?
Please let me know your thoughts
Thanks
Umakanth

Hi Fernando,
Which transaction are you using for the posting?
Please, consider that Inventory Management Transactions (MBxx, MIGO, etc) do not update the Inbound delivery status and document flow.
If you use a Shipping Transaction like VL32N for the receipt, then this should update the delivery.
You can see the SAP Note 199703 about this.
As of Release ERP 6.0, MM transactions can update the inbound delivery if this has been activated in the customizing.
See the Note 1050944 in this regard:
"As of ERP 6.0, you can use inventory management transactions (MB0A, MIGO, MBST) to carry out the goods receipt for inbound deliveries in the standard SAP system in such a way that the inbound delivery that is relevant for goods movement is updated.(...)".
If you are in this release or higher you might want to see this note.
I hope this helps!
Esther.

Return Delivery Goods Receipt amount takes current MAP instead of old MAP

Hi,
I'm facing a problem in the following scenario:
1. Sales order is created
2. Delivery is created
3. Goods Issue for the Delivery is posted (cost of goods sold = current moving average price of material = 100 SEK)
4. Invoice is created
Event: Moving average price of material is increased with 100 % (Moving average price changed from 100 SEK to 200 SEK)
Event: Customer returns the order for some reason
5. Return order is created with reference to the invoice in step 4 (same amount the invoice)
6. Return delivery is created
7. Credit note is created (same amount as the invoice)
8. Goods Receipt for the Returns delivery is posted (cost of goods sold = current moving average price of material = 200 SEK)
Result: The financial bookings after the Goods Receipt will use the new moving average price and the stock value will increase with 200 SEK, even though the initial stock deduction was only 100 SEK to delivery the material to the customer.
Problem: We have now created 100 SEK worth of stock --> This is not allowed
Question: How can I manipulate the goods receipt amount to use the old moving average price of 100 SEK instead of 200 SEK?
Thanks for your suggestions!
Edited by: Berglund Teodor on Jun 1, 2010 4:17 PM

Hi Teodor!
I have to solve the same problem. Could you give me some more information about tha way you used this badi?
Thank you .
Florina

Customer Exits for Delivery & Goods Receipt - Very Urgent

Hi Everyone,
We have got a requirement where we have to trigger a screen exit/badi at the time of posting the material document in transaction MIGO or delivery document in VL01N, can any one tell me the right exit as this is very urgent.
Rgds,

Hi,
Will you elaborate on this, I cant use call screen statement as this gives syntax errors, I have to necessarily use 'leave to' or 'call transaction', however using this above mentioned I wont have any scope for the variables which were there in the method of the BADI????,
Any help would be very much rewarded.
Rgds,

GR and Inbound Delivery

Hi All,
As per my understanding GR process is differentitaed based on
1. Physical Receipts
2. Non-Physical Receipts.
1. Physical Receipts: Identified by Confirmation control key Confirmations in purchase order. Meaning all the receipts which are received physically in warehouse should have confirmation control as Confirmation and theprocess should be as follows: Purchase Order -> Confirmation as confirmation control key -> Goods Receipts through MIGO
2. Non-Physical Receipts: Identified by confirmation control key Shipping Notification (which is also the case for both these POs.) Meaning all the receipts which are not received physically in warehouse should have confirmation controlas Shipping Notification and the process should be as
follows: Purchase Order -> Confirmation as Shipping Notifications -> Inbound Delivery -> Goods Receipts through VL06IG.
(We can receive via MIGO as well)
My question is what is the process we need to follow if the conf. control has Rough GR and Shipping Not./Rough GR.
Thanks & Regards,
Krishna

if conformation/shipping is active , do Gr with vl31n and do PGR .then it will go to concerned plant, SL.it is like normal migo process. But if conformation/ shipping noti is there u cant do GR using Migo .

Inbound delivery reversal issue

Hi,
When user tried to reverse inbound delivery in VL09, system shows error message M7265.Gr is done for PO.ts HU managed.
Is there any option...
regards....

Can you please check in inbound delivery document flow is Goods receipt process is completed.If yes check the Handling units stsus is it availble in your ware house with out change.
If delivery goods receipt is not completed then unassign the handling units from inbound delivery then delete inbound delivery.

Reversing inbound delivery

Hi gurus,
I've cancelled the Goods receipt document using MBST but my Inbound delivery still has the goods movement status as complete. I tried reversing the reversal document using MBST and doing VL09, but nothing happens in VL09, my Inbound delivery goods movement status doesnot change. Can anyone please advise how to reverse the Inbound delivery .
Thanks in advance
Chris T

Hi Experts,
I have similar case. The requirement is that whenever there is Quality rejection then automatically Inbound Delivery should get cancelled or system should allow to do Inbound delivery for next time (as a replacement for inital Q-Rejection) They don't want to delete Inbound del. manually.
I tried doing VL09 but it's not working. I did GR through tcode 'MIGO' (w.r.t Inbound Del.) --> VL09 (Rev Good Mvmt) then got error ''No data available for these selection criteria''.
Kindly suggest & give your inputs.
Regards,
Awadhesh.

Good receipt should be ticked default for PO

Dear Gurus,
When i create Purchase order for document type "NB", i want the default tick should be marked for Good receipt - under Item details>>Delivery>>Goods receipt
In SPRO, where i can do the configuration
Please advice
Regards
RS

Dear Mohammed,
We use to create PO previously with
Case 1: Account Assignment "K" and short text - in that case we need to tick the GR
Case 2 . Account assignment blank and materials number - default GR tick will come.
Now we are creating PO with Account Assignment as "K" with Material Number - now the GR tick is not defaulted.
This Account Assingment "K" - GR ticked in maintain Account Assingment in all DEV, QAS & PRD system
You advice is more appreciated
REgards
RS

Exit or Badi to prevent MIGO Goods Receipt on PO with Inbound Delivery

Hi,
I am hoping that someone can provide me with some direction on how to prevent the use of MIGO for GR when the PO being received is (or should be) linked to an inbound delivery.
For purchase orders with a confirmation control key an inbound delivery is to be created and the goods receipt needs to be done from the inbound delivery. This scenario also includes the case of stock transport orders whereby an inbound delivery is created form the outbound delivery. On the other hand for purchase orders without a confirmation control key no inbound delivery is created and the MIGO transaction is to be used to post the goods receipt.
Since both processes are possible, I would like to prevent people from posting the GR using MIGO if certain conditions pre-exist.
Can anyone suggest a means to accomplish this goal? Is there an exit or badi in MIGO that you would suggest using?
Thanks,
Paul

Hi,
The following user eixts and badis available for migo transaction:
Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
MB_CF001
Customer Function Exit in the Case of Updating a Art. Doc.
MBCF0011
Read from RESB and RKPF for print list in MB26
MBCF0010
Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
MBCF0009
Filling the storage location field
MBCF0007
Customer function exit: Updating a reservation
MBCF0006
Customer function for WBS element
MBCF0005
Article document item for goods receipt/issue slip
MBCF0002
Customer function exit: Segment text in article doc. item
Business Add-in
MB_RESERVATION_BADI
MB21/MB22: Check and Complete Dialog Data
MB_QUAN_CHECK_BADI
BAdI: Item Data at Time of Quantity Check
MB_PHYSINV_INTERNAL
Connection: Core Inventory and Retail AddOn
MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI
BAdI in MIGO for Changing Item Data
MB_MIGO_BADI
BAdI in MIGO for External Detail Subscreens
MB_DOC_BADI_INTERNAL
BAdIs when Creating an Article Document (SAP Internal)
MB_DOCUMENT_UPDATE
BADI when updating article document: MSEG and MKPF
MB_DOCUMENT_BADI
BAdIs when Creating an Article Document
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7_QTY
Proposal of quantity from Excise invoice in GR
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7
BAdI for India Version exit in include MM07MFB7
MB_CIN_LMBMBU04
posting of gr
MB_CHECK_LINE_BADI
BAdI: Check Line Before Copying to the Blocking Tables
ARC_MM_MATBEL_WRITE
Check Add-On-Specific Data for MM_MATBEL
ARC_MM_MATBEL_CHECK
Check Add-On-Specific Criteria for MM_MATBEL
If it is helpful rewards points
Regards
Pratap.M

Goods receipt for inbound delivery

Hi,
I'm using idoc DELVRY03 in order to post a goods issue. And It's working very well.
I want to make a goods receipt for an inbound delivery using idoc DELVRY03. When I use this idoc for this (To make a goods receipt), my delivery can't be updated any more (Just like if the goods issue was done) and Its status are updated. And I can't to make the goods receipt manually. But the stock isn't updated, No item document is generated, and the quantity received is still equal to 0.
Can any one please tell me if there is a special thing I need to do in order It works. And If It's not possible, to make the goods receipt using delvry03, what's the idoc type allowing to do this.
Thanks in advance

Hi
Please try using idoc type DESADV01.
Please award points if you find this helpful
rgds

Deficit of stock in Posto Goods Receipt of inbound delivery

Hi folks. I´m trying to post goods receipt of an inbound delivery (return order), but for one material we get this message:
Deficit of BA Unrestricted-use 21 CRT : 697-0 0001 3002 DEVOLUÇÕES
I don´t get it, since it seems to me that its calling a deficit of 21 crates of the material 697-0, but this is an inboud delivery! I don't have any stock of this material at this plant.
Any suggestions?

The message looks it is checking for batch. Go to t.code 0VLP (Zero V L P), select the item category of the inbound delivery and go to the details. In the warehouse control and packing data you can find a field No batch check. Check this field and test again. Also make sure, the AutoBatchDetermination box is UNCHECKED.
Regards,

LE-TRA Shipment costs as inbound delivery costs, goods receipt

Hello gurus:
We are facing the following scenario, regarding inbound transportation.
We plan our shipment document and shipment costs, and they feature several items. Each of those items represent a shipping service, which in certain cases be taken on different countries by the same service agent.
That is, we have a service X on country A, with tax indicator 1, and service Y on country B, with tax indicator 2.
Both services would need to be transferred as delivery costs to the purchase order.
According to note 427944, shipment cost value is cumulated by service agent., so that it looks impossible to get the values broken up to the purchase order, which would be the first step to subsequently get the right tax indicators for each item of the shipment.
Even using different condition types on the shipment cost document, system cumulates by service agent and transfers to the first condition found on the purchase order schema.
Has any of you faced similar issue? Any workaround possible?.
Thanks in advance for your valuable help.
David Ramos.
PORCELANOSA MM.
This is the section of note 427944 that indicates the treatment of the shipment costs in the purchase order,
Transfer the shipment costs into the condition types of the purchase order:
The shipment cost value (without tax amounts) is cumulated for all relevant shipment cost documents
for each service agent and transferred to a corresponding condition type of the purchase order item.
Before cumulation, the amounts are first converted into the purchase order currency.
1. A transfer of the values for each condition type (similar to the transfer from a shipment
cost document to the SD billing document) is not supported.
2. If different service agents exist in the shipment cost documents, a corresponding number of
condition lines (with value 0) must be specified in the purchase order item. These can always
belong to the same condition type (in schema 'Manual') or also to different condition types (not
'Manual'):
a) Manual condition lines: If the condition type in the schema of the purchase order is
marked as 'manual', the condition type must be created (with value 0) in the purchase order
item before the goods receipt. If delivery costs are expected from different service agents,
several non-valuated entries must be generated for this condition type. If more condition
lines exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines
are missing, the last service agents are not settled.
- Advantage: You only have to define one condition type for the delivery costs.
- Disadvantage: Each purchase order must be processed manually before the goods receipt.
b) Automatic condition lines: If the condition lines are to be generated automatically for
the delivery costs (the condition type is not flagged as 'Manual' in the schema), the schema
must have enough condition types to settle several service agents. If more condition lines
exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines are
missing, the last service agents are not settled.
- Advantage: The goods receipt can be carried out without manual preparation beforehand in
the purchase order.
- Disadvantage: You must define identical condition types with different names.
Message was edited by: PORCELANOSA MM

Hi,
If you refereed the OSS Note 427944 correctly it explains how the shipment cost can be transferred to delivery cost based on some pre-requisite.
Like the value for PO should be >0
Like the service agent is involved during shipment liability, then there should be cumulative transfer for each value which will update based on shipment cost if PO value is "0".
The shipment cost will be delivered to all delivery items based on weight.
If you want to enhance this then you need to use the enhancement V54KSFRC to update the values as per your requirement.
Rgds,

Post Goods Receipt for Inbound Delivery using WHSCON IDoc

Dear All
Currently I am working on a big project dealing with EDI connections to our logistics partner for the Export business. The entire message flow between Lindt and our partner should be via EDI. Our SAP release is (still) 4.6c.
We will create two kinds of despatch advice messages, one for inbound deliveries and one for outbound deliveries for customers.
I would appreciate your support in the following problem that I am facing with the inbound delivery scenario:
We create stock transport orders (purchase orders, POs) for the goods intended to be delivered into the plant at our partner
We create a delivery (type NL = replenishment delivery) for this POs
As soon as we post the goods issue we send the despatch advice (as EANCOM D96A DESADV message) to our partner.
At this point the delivery is basically completed, i.e. packing status (PS) and goods movement status (GM / GS) are equal to 'C' (= completed).
Our logistics partner uses the same EDI message to send us the goods receipts data, e.g.:
We dispatched 50 units of a product => QTY:50:12
The partner received indeed 50 units => QVR:50:66
Please note that we do not use the QVR segment for the quantity difference (between despatched and received quantity) but it contains the received units. This way we avoid negative values in the QVR segment.
When the logistics partner sends back the DESADV message containing the received quantities (QVR segment) we want to make
the goods receipts for the products in the original stock transport order and
upate the message flow in the delivery
My idea was to transform the incoming DESADV message into a WHSCON.DELVRY03 IDoc based on the documentation in: [Delivery Interface|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/e2/654b15a9f411d184ec0000e81ddea0/content.htm]
In the delivery header control E1EDL18 I used QUALF = 'PGI' (Post goods issue).
I prepared an inbound WHSCON IDoc according to the documentation mentioned below. I managed to get some feedback from the Idoc processing implying that the system tried to do the goods receipt in the PO but failed.
To make a long story short here are my questions:
Can an inbound WHSCON IDoc used for doing both the goods receipt in the PO and the update of the message flow in the delivery?
Does anybody have an example on how to fill the WHSCON IDoc?
Or is my approach a cul-de-sac ?
Kind Regards
Uwe
PS: A related question can be found here: Goods Receipt in PO AND Message Flow Update in Inb. Delivery using WMMBXY

Hi Uwe,
Can an inbound WHSCON IDoc used for doing both the goods receipt in the PO and the update of the message flow in the delivery?
The binary answer would be no. You should use WMMBXY or MBGMCR instead.
But if we are doing goods receipt against Inbound delivery then answer is YES with additionally E1EDL18-QUALF = 'PIC' populated. But please remember no partial receipt is possible against Inbound Delivery.
We should populate E1EDL20-VBELN with our Inbound delivery number and line item info should go to E1EDL24.
I have done a similar interface recently where we are doing receipt against Inbound delivery. But our case was a bit complex because we had to support against Inbound delivery. So we had to go for a custom solution on top of IDOC_INPUT_DELVRY.
Hope this helps. Let me know if you have more questions.
Regards,
Rudra

Inbound delivery goods receipt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for