InfoPath form load rule is not checking all the rows in form library

Hi,
Requirement:
We have a form library named "HR Annual Review". In the InfoPath form we have two buttons "Save" and "Submit". User is allowed to Save multiple times and only once using Submit button. The file name of form library "HR
Annual Review" will be stored in the format “<username>+<mm>+<dd>+<yy>.xml”. Say for example, an user named Mike Walt submitted a form then the file name will be as “MikeWalt012314.xml”. If the same user (Mike Walt)
submits the form and tries to open the form for subsequent edit, then we need to show a view which has an error info saying “The Appraisal is already submitted for the current appraisal cycle”.
Solution we tried:
To achieve the above requirement, we tried using InfoPath Form Load and add a rule to check whether the combination of current user name and the year already exists in the filename column of the form library. But the rule we applied is not checking all the
rows in the form library. The rule is always checking the first row of the form library.
What we need:
We need the validation using InfoPath rule or some other way/solution to check whether the combination of current login username and current year file already exists in the form library.
Thanks in advance.
Srivignesh J

Hi Srivignesh,
Submit button Uses the Main Data connection to submit the data to the list. This is what you are using and naming the file in the format. You can create secondary data submit that will update the exiting item in the list. With this, you don't have to create
any rules to check all the rows which is also not possible in OOB InfoPath.
Once you have the two data connection, hide the toolbar from the form and display these two on the button. For The Submit button, apply the rule to hide the button if created by is not empty. For Save button, apply the rule to hide the button if Created
By is empty. This way, when a new form is created, you will see the Submit button, and when the user have to update the form, they will see Save button. Hope it help.s
Regards, Kapil ***Please mark answer as Helpful or Answered after consideration***

Similar Messages

Form load rules are not working on display and edit forms

Hi
I have customized SharePoint 2013 list form using InfoPath 2013. I want to hide certain fields based on user group. I created rules on form load for that. These rules are working fine on New Form but are not working on display and edit form.
What can I do?

It could be because the value might have not changed ie, you might be checking for a particular value, the values might have got overwritten when the new form is saved, see if that value is blank or overwritten in display and edit forms.
I would first check the form load rules and check those values again in Display form and edit form, if the values are not getting cleared/overwritten.
It would be better if you could upload the screenprint.
Hope this helps!
Ram - SharePoint Architect
Blog - SharePointDeveloper.in
Please vote or mark your question answered, if my reply helps you

ALV not showing all the rows! Please help!

Hi Experts,
     I have webdynpro ALV report and I am using SALV_WD_TABLE as the reusable component. In component controller's WDDOINIT I have written the code for pulling teh data from R/3 table and binding it to ALV table.
In the view's WDDOMODIFYVIEW event I have written the following code to get subtotal and grand total of Qty column based on product column.
      I have coded like this:
      lr_field_settings ?= l_value.
lr_field = lr_field_settings->get_field( 'PRODUCT' ).
lr_field->if_salv_wd_sort~set_group_aggregation_allowed( ABAP_TRUE ).
lr_field->if_salv_wd_sort~create_sort_rule( ).
l_sortrule = lr_field->if_salv_wd_sort~GET_SORT_RULE( ).
l_sortrule->set_sort_order( if_salv_wd_c_sort=>sort_order_ascending ).
l_sortrule->set_group_aggregation( ABAP_TRUE ).
*...Aggregate Field PRODUCT
lr_field = lr_field_settings->get_field( 'QTY' ).
lr_field->if_salv_wd_aggr~create_aggr_rule( ).
lr_aggr_rule = lr_field->if_salv_wd_aggr~get_aggr_rule( ).
lr_aggr_rule->set_aggregation_type( if_salv_wd_c_aggregation=>aggrtype_total ).
It is working now but my ALV table is not showing all the rows. I have 6 products and it is showing from product 2. But it is calculating grand total and subtotal correctly. I am not able to see the first product row and subtotal for that. Even if I click on the ^ icon in the ALV table below it is not showing all the rows.
What could be the problem?
Please help
Thanks
Gopal

did you somehow manage to set the "first visible row" property on table object
to 2.   Only thing I can think of that could cause this effect.
Cheers
Phil

Is there a way to BULK COLLECT with FOR UPDATE and not lock ALL the rows?

Currently, we fetch a cursor on a few million rows using BULK COLLECT.
In a FORALL loop, we update the rows.
What is happening now, is that we run this procedure at the same time, and there is another session running a MERGE statement on the same table, and a DEADLOCK is created between them.
I'd like to add to the cursor the FOR UPDATE clause, but from what i've read,
it seems that this will cause ALL the rows in the cursor to become locked.
This is a problem, as the other session is running MERGE statements on the table every few seconds, and I don't want it to fail with ORA-0054 (resource busy).
What I would like to know is if there is a way, that only the rows in the
current bulk will be locked, and all the other rows will be free for updates.
To reproduce this problem:
1. Create test table:
create table TEST_TAB
ID1 VARCHAR2(20),
ID2 VARCHAR2(30),
LAST_MODIFIED DATE
2. Add rows to test table:
insert into TEST_TAB (ID1, ID2, LAST_MODIFIED)
values ('416208000770698', '336015000385349', to_date('15-11-2009 07:14:56', 'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss'));
insert into TEST_TAB (ID1, ID2, LAST_MODIFIED)
values ('208104922058401', '336015000385349', to_date('15-11-2009 07:11:15', 'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss'));
insert into TEST_TAB (ID1, ID2, LAST_MODIFIED)
values ('208104000385349', '336015000385349', to_date('15-11-2009 07:15:13', 'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss'));
3. Create test procedure:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE TEST_PROC IS
TYPE id1_typ is table of TEST_TAB.ID1%TYPE;
TYPE id2_typ is table of TEST_TAB.ID2%TYPE;
id1_arr id1_typ;
id2_arr id2_typ;
CURSOR My_Crs IS
SELECT ID1, ID2
FROM TEST_TAB
WHERE ID2 = '336015000385349'
FOR UPDATE;
BEGIN
OPEN My_Crs;
LOOP
FETCH My_Crs bulk collect
INTO id1_arr, id2_arr LIMIT 1;
Forall i in 1 .. id1_arr.COUNT
UPDATE TEST_TAB
SET LAST_MODIFIED = SYSDATE
where ID2 = id2_arr(i)
and ID1 = id1_arr(i);
dbms_lock.sleep(15);
EXIT WHEN My_Crs%NOTFOUND;
END LOOP;
CLOSE My_Crs;
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20000,
'Test Update ' || SQLCODE || ' ' || SQLERRM);
END TEST_PROC;
4. Create another procedure to check if table rows are locked:
create or replace procedure check_record_locked(p_id in TEST_TAB.ID1%type) is
cursor c is
select 'dummy'
from TEST_TAB
WHERE ID2 = '336015000385349'
and ID1 = p_id
for update nowait;
e_resource_busy exception;
pragma exception_init(e_resource_busy, -54);
begin
open c;
close c;
dbms_output.put_line('Record ' || to_char(p_id) || ' is not locked.');
rollback;
exception
when e_resource_busy then
dbms_output.put_line('Record ' || to_char(p_id) || ' is locked.');
end check_record_locked;
5. in one session, run the procedure TEST_PROC.
6. While it's running, in another session, run this block:
begin
check_record_locked('208104922058401');
check_record_locked('416208000770698');
check_record_locked('208104000385349');
end;
7. you will see that all records are identified as locked.
Is there a way that only 1 row will be locked, and the other 2 will be unlocked?
Thanks,
Yoni.

I don't have database access on weekends (look at it as a template)
suppose you
create table help_iot
(bucket number,
id1    varchar2(20),
constraint help_iot_pk primary key (bucket,id1)
organization index;not very sure about the create table syntax above.
declare
maximal_bucket number := 10000; -- will update few hundred rows at a time if you must update few million rows
the_sysdate date := sysdate;
begin
truncate table help_iot;
insert into help_iot
select ntile(maximal_bucket) over (order by id1) bucket,id1
    from test_tab
   where id2 = '336015000385349';
for i in 1 .. maximal_bucket
loop
    select id1,id2,last_modified
      from test_tab
     where id2 = '336015000385349'
       and id1 in (select id1
                     from help_iot
                    where bucket = i
       for update of last_modified;
    update test_tab
       set last_modified = the_sysdate
     where id2 = '336015000385349'
       and id1 in (select id1
                     from help_iot
                    where bucket = i
    commit;
    dbms_lock.sleep(15);
end loop;
end;Regards
Etbin
introduced the_sysdate if last_modified must be the same for all updated rows
Edited by: Etbin on 29.11.2009 16:48

RowSetIterator not returning all the rows

Hi,
We have a use-case where we need to create a new row iterator to insert rows(values) in it. Immediately after insertRow(), we are reading the values by creating a secondary row set iterator (createRowSetIterator) but it is not returning all the inserted rows. Here is the code snippet:
Code to insert rows:
public void insertTerrLineOfBusiness(CreateOperation operation, TerritoryVORowImpl newTerritoryRow, TerritoryVORowImpl selectedRow){
if((operation.equals(CreateOperation.CREATE))
|| operation.equals(CreateOperation.COPY)
|| operation.equals(CreateOperation.ADD_EXISTING)){
RowIterator selTerritoryLineOfBusinessIter = selectedRow.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness();
//RowIterator newTerrLineOfBusinessIter = newTerritoryRow.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness();
ViewRowSetImpl newTerrLineOfBusinessIter = (ViewRowSetImpl) newTerritoryRow.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness();
newTerrLineOfBusinessIter.setAssociationConsistent(true);
while(selTerritoryLineOfBusinessIter.hasNext()){
TerritoryLineOfBusinessVORowImpl selTerrLineOfBusinessRow =
(TerritoryLineOfBusinessVORowImpl)selTerritoryLineOfBusinessIter.next();
TerritoryLineOfBusinessVORowImpl newTerrLineOfBusinessRow =
(TerritoryLineOfBusinessVORowImpl)newTerrLineOfBusinessIter.createRow();
newTerrLineOfBusinessRow.setTerritoryVersionId(newTerritoryRow.getTerritoryVersionId());
newTerrLineOfBusinessRow.setLobCode(selTerrLineOfBusinessRow.getLobCode());
newTerrLineOfBusinessIter.insertRow(newTerrLineOfBusinessRow);
Code to read:
public List getTerritoryLobsValues() {
List <String> lobsValues = new ArrayList<String>();
if (this.getTerritory().getCurrentRow() != null) {
TerritoryVORowImpl territoryVORowImpl =
(TerritoryVORowImpl)this.getTerritory().getCurrentRow();
if(territoryVORowImpl.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness() != null){
ViewRowSetImpl territoryLob =
(ViewRowSetImpl)territoryVORowImpl.getTerritoryLineOfBusiness();
RowSetIterator itr = territoryLob.createRowSetIterator(null);
if(itr!=null){
while(itr.hasNext()) {
Row r = itr.next();
String lobCode = (String)r.getAttribute("LobCode");
lobsValues.add(lobCode);
itr.closeRowSetIterator();
return lobsValues;
Can anybody suggest what could be the issue? How to fix it?
Thanks,
Akhila

Thanks for your response.
Jdev version:
Primary == FUSIONAPPS_PT.V1REL6INT_LINUX.X64_120719.0800 (Primary Product for the view)
Primary depends on FMWTOOLS == FMWTOOLS_11.1.1.6.0_GENERIC_120112.0037.2
FMWTOOLS depends on label == JDEVADF_11.1.1.6.0_GENERIC_111205.1733.6192.1
The above label originated from base label == JDEVADF_11.1.1.6.0_GENERIC_111205.1733.6192
Use case: We have a tree table, each record may or may not have Line of Business(LOB) associated with it. On creating a child node in the tree table, the child node copies all the attributes of parent. These attributes are not committed explicitly, if user wants to save the child node only then the attributes are committed.
Giving secondary rowSetIterator a name did not help in resolving this issue.
If I am calling postChanges() before reading from secondary row iterator then its returning all the inserted values. But this.getTransaction().postChanges() is a JAudit violation, so cannot use it:
RuleId: apps-jbo-category.File.AdfModel.54
Rule: insertTerrLineOfBusiness - Review DBTransaction.postChanges call to ensure passivation-safety
Any pointers on this?

Rowtype not fetching all the rows

This my cursor declaration. When the Package is executed it get all records minus 1 (Assumming there are 10 rows to be processed, it ONLY processes 9 records)
cursor X1 is
select *
from NT
hdr X1%rowtype;
Below is the procedure call
     open X1;
     fetch X1 into hdr;
     loop
     exit when X1%notfound;
               fetch X1 into hdr;
               pkgXX.insrt(hdr);
     end loop;
          commit;
     close X1;

That makes sense. You 1) fetch a row, 2) check for %notfound, 3) fetch a row and process it. Notice that the row you fetched in 1 was never processed. Try this:
open X1;
loop
fetch X1 into hdr;
exit when X1%notfound;
pkgXX.insrt(hdr);
end loop;
commit;
close X1;

Report not displaying all the rows

Hi Experts,
We are having a report which when ran for a year as a filter criteria gives me 6725 rows and i also observe that there are more rows which are not getting displayed. Is there any restriction with the no of rows getting displayed. I am also able to find the specific information of a particular vendor when i explicitly filter it. Which would otherwise not get displayed in the normal report execution for the entire year. Thanks
Warm Regards,
Akilesh

Hello Akilesh,
This is the issue with your Bex Analyzer...! please update ur Bex with all the latest patches. I am sure this report sould be running on other mechines...
I will try to find the concern patch in t he mean while..!
EnjoySAP

Entity based VO not showing all the rows

Hi, I am having a entity based VO in a page. When we run a page from Jdeveloper the table shows all 1300 rows. But in Front end it shows onli 1001 rows

Hi ,
Or instead of setMaxFetchsize see By Johny explain setAttribute in OAF?
if it is helpful to you..

Discover Plus - Export to Text Tab delimited is not exporting all the rows

Hi gurus,
I am trying to export a large data report which has 1 million plus rows to text tab delimited. The export takes 9 plus hours to export and the data is not more than 100000.
My question is
1. How can I make the discoverer to export it quicker or rather faster to tab delimited.
2. Where can I change the number of rows to be exported.
Any help, suggestions is appreciated.
Thanks,
SAI

Hi Rod,
Yes. The text tab delimited export is taking lot of time. The total rows for this report are nearly 1 million. If I break down the report with condition and export it I was able to export it ( three files exported with 212000, 103000 and 687000 rows respectively).
But I m still having problems exporting it in one shot. Is there any way I could resolve this? Please let me know.
Thanks,
SAI

How to reduce the version of a pdf 1.7 to 1.5 & how to remove all the embedded xml form ?

Hi Team,
I am using adobe acrobat x pro. I have a pdf file of version 1.7 which showing embedded xml forms. I tried to remove all the 'embedded xml form' by using Adobe Live cycle Designer ES2. Then i tried to reduce the version by using Adobe acrobat x pro but it's still showing that there are some 'embedded xml form' for which it's not allowing me to reduce the vesion of pdf file in Adobe Acrobat x pro and also i want reduce the version of the pdf 1.7 to 1.5. Can you please guide me the step to reduce the pdf file version and how to remove the embedded xml form from the pdf file ?

If the PDF is the same one from the link in your post here:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1174643
That PDF being protected may have something to do with why you cannot do what you'd like to.
Be well...

Infopath form load rule not working in browser forms but works on Client

Hi
I am working on an Infopath form and there are rules on form load. The form load checks for a value in a list, if the username() matches the one in the list, then the form would change its view.
It works when I open it on client, but on the browser it fails.
Have anyone encountered such an issue.

Check below:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16222681/infopath-rule-is-not-running-when-checking-sharepoint-list-field-value
Ensure that "Include data for the active form only" was checked (I had to separate this field into another data connection because that box could not be checked for another field I was using), and
Ensure that in the rule I was selecting from the "dataFields" folder under the data connection instead of "queryFields"
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/28554/infopath-form-load-rules-not-working
if I edit the Infopath form on Infopath 2007, it seems that the rules for the load form will be visible if created.
This look like a bug. Here are the steps below that will lead you to the bug:
Step 1: Open the infopath form in Infopath 2010 and create 6 rules for Form Load and Save it as a file.
Step 2: Open that infopath form that you created in Step 1 in InfoPath 2010 and go to the
Form Load section. You will only see the first 5 rules. The 6th rules that you created for Step 1 will just "vanish". Now, close that infopath form.
Step 3: Open that infopath form that you created in step 1 in InfoPath 2007 and select Tools > Form Option. In the
Open and Save category, click the Rules button and add a new rule in it and save it.
Step 4: Open that infopath form that you modify as describe in Step 3 in InfoPath 2010. That 6th rule will be visible.
Therefore, there might be a bug in InfoPath 2010 that restrict Rules to a max of 5 in Form Load and thus if anyone open that form in SharePoint, only the first 5 rules will be executed.
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Form Load rules of InfoPath are executed many times

By examining the logs I saw that the “Form Load” actions of my InfoPath form in SharePoint are executed twice.
I made some tests with Fiddler and found out that the page _layouts/15/FormServer.aspx was loaded twice.
It must be related to the browser because with Chrome the same form is loaded 3 times.
This behavior is very annoying because my form is initialized using web services which of course take time to execute.
Is this a bug or am I missing something?
Additional infos:
Occurs with SharePoint 2010 & 2013
IE 10
SOAP Web Services
Form published to a content type
InfoPath executed in browser without code
Thanks

Hi,
Based on your description, my understanding is that the infopath form load rules execute more than one time when form initialized.
As the data in the form is initialized by SOAP web service, I suggest you check if there are some post back event in the page.
Here is a detailed article for your reference:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16223324/fiddler-and-monitoring-web-service-traffic
Best Regards
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
Zhengyu Guo
TechNet Community Support

I have a 27" thunderbolt display NOT the iMac, and I'm trying to connect my xbox 360 to it via the Belkin AV360. I plug everything in and it does not work? I check all the power cables and and connections and still not he issue. Iv'e tried C-F2 also. Help

I have a 27" thunderbolt display NOT the iMac, and I'm trying to connect my xbox 360 to it via the Belkin AV360. I plug everything in and it does not work? I check all the power cables and and connections and still not he issue. Iv'e tried C-F2 also. has anyone used this devive (AV360) on there own 27" thunderbolt display (not the imac) and gotten it to work? If so I'd appreciate the help.

There are multiple reasons that lead to issue. You should read the troubleshooting guide to get the right solution to solve the issue: iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch not recognized in iTunes for Windows - Apple Support

Hello After upgrading iPhoto 9.1.2 when you synchronize the iphone / iphoto ipad events are not copied correctly (this option checked all the photos on itunes).

Hello
After upgrading iPhoto 9.1.2 when you synchronize the iphone / iphoto ipad events are not copied correctly (this option checked all the photos on itunes).

I found this other thread discussing this topic, no fix, I will revert to 9.1.1 from Time Machine and wait for a new update.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3023160?

I am not able to hear any sounds of games on the speaker. Though the sounds function on the head fones. The speaker works perfect in other applications except games.Have checked all the settings but not able to fix it.

i am not able to hear any sounds of games on the speaker. Though the sounds function on the head fones. The speaker works perfect in other applications except games.Have checked all the settings but not able to fix it.

Have you got notifications muted ? Only notifications (including games) get muted, so the iPod and Videos apps, and headphones, still get sound. Depending on what you've got Settings > General > Use Side Switch To set to (mute or rotation lock), then you can mute notifications by the switch on the right hand side of the iPad, or via the taskbar : double-click the home button; slide from the left; and its the icon; press home again to exit the taskbar. The function that isn't on the side switch is set via the taskbar instead : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4085
If that doesn't solve it then try a reset : press and hold both the sleep and home buttons for about 10 to 15 seconds (ignore the red slider), after which the Apple logo should appear - you won't lose any content, it's the iPad equivalent of a reboot.

InfoPath form load rule is not checking all the rows in form library

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for