Malicious/Pointless orders being generated

Hi
Our website was launched a month ago and we have quite a basic (but
perfectly sufficient) shopping cart system built with ASP and SQL Server
2000.
When the shopper clicks "Proceed to Secure to Checkout" then the page moves
to checkout1.asp where they enter the details regarding the customer ie
name, address (home/delivery). Then checkout2.asp shows a confirmation of
the order, its contents and where it will be shipped to.
Checkout3.asp takes payment details. We have a Javascript on this page which
checks Visa, Mastercard and a couple of others for the correct pattern.
Over the last few days we have been receiving a number of orders which
obviously arent seriously intended to be genuine. At first we had customers
leaving ALL fields in checkout1.asp blank but now I have put a Javascript in
to check that certain form elements have content.
This morning these form elements are just being filled out with "a" in each
box. I am loathe to make customers register for the site because I have had
many customers telling me so directly.
Can anyone suggest what to do? I have heard about sites that check your IP
address and record this with transactions. Is this feasible? Does anyone
have any other suggestions as to what I can do?
Thanks
Richard
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/2002

You should always validate on the server side. What if a client turns
javascript off? Or uses something other than a browser?
I would also do more than just a syntax check on the credit card number.
This should clean things up.
Bob
"Richard Davies" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:aaoh5u$a3o$[email protected]..
Hi
Our website was launched a month ago and we have quite a basic (but
perfectly sufficient) shopping cart system built with ASP and SQL Server
2000.
When the shopper clicks "Proceed to Secure to Checkout" then the pagemoves
to checkout1.asp where they enter the details regarding the customer ie
name, address (home/delivery). Then checkout2.asp shows a confirmation of
the order, its contents and where it will be shipped to.
Checkout3.asp takes payment details. We have a Javascript on this pagewhich
checks Visa, Mastercard and a couple of others for the correct pattern.
Over the last few days we have been receiving a number of orders which
obviously arent seriously intended to be genuine. At first we hadcustomers
leaving ALL fields in checkout1.asp blank but now I have put a Javascriptin
to check that certain form elements have content.
This morning these form elements are just being filled out with "a" ineach
box. I am loathe to make customers register for the site because I havehad
many customers telling me so directly.
Can anyone suggest what to do? I have heard about sites that check your IP
address and record this with transactions. Is this feasible? Does anyone
have any other suggestions as to what I can do?
Thanks
Richard
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.351 / Virus Database: 197 - Release Date: 19/04/2002

Similar Messages

  • REM Planned Orders being generated with Order type LA instead of PE

    Hi All,
    I'm running the Repetitive Manufacturing scenario and when I execute the MRP run for my Planned Independent Requirements, Planned orders are automatically generated with the order type LA. I understand that for repetitive manuf., planned orders should have the order typ PE.
    Is there something missing in config? How can I get the orders to be generated with the Order type PE??

    HI,
    Check the following settings which is required for REM
    1. Master Data -
    - Create Material master - MM01
    -Create BOM - CS01
    -Create rate Routing - CA21
    Create Rem profile - SPRO ->Production planning -> Rem.Manuf->Control data or use existing one
    Assign Bom seelction method = 2 & 3 (Prod version) in MRP view
    Rem MFG indicator - mrp view in MM01.
    Assign the REM profile to a material - MRP view in MM01.
    create Valid Production version - MRP view in MM01 & Check Rem mfg ind
    Assign the BOM and routings in Prod. Version
    2.For Preliminary Cost Estimate:
    Create version specific product cost collecter for Header material and preiminary cost estimate - KKF6N as per the settings in Rem profile. -
    3 For standard cat Estimate.
    create std Cost estimation(CK11n)
    std cost Estimation Mark & release(CK24)
    Thanks
    Hrishi

  • ADDM report not being generated

    I noticed that addm reports are not being generated from last 2 days. So I did the following:
    SQL> exec dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot;
    BEGIN dbms_workload_repository.create_snapshot; END;
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-13516: AWR Operation failed: only a subset of SQL can be issued
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_WORKLOAD_REPOSITORY", line 10
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_WORKLOAD_REPOSITORY", line 33
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    I got above error. I am not sure what that means. I also ran below SQL:
    SQL> select nam.ksppinm name, val.KSPPSTVL, nam.ksppdesc description
    2 from x$ksppi nam, x$ksppsv val
    3 where nam.indx = val.indx and
    4 nam.ksppinm = '_awr_restrict_mode'
    5 order by 1
    6 ;
    awrrestrict_mode
    FALSE
    AWR Restrict Mode
    What could be the reason that the reports are not being generated anymore

    Check Note:308003.1 - AWR Snapshots Not Generating

  • How to modify the SQL being generated from BC, to fix the issue

    Hi,
    We have seen a strange issue in our implementation.The issue is also reproducible in Vanilla environment.
    In Contact List Applet, if we Query in First Name or Last Name fields in UI, the Query being generated is,showing that, Siebel is Querying for first name in S_POSTN_CON.CON_FST_NAME. This is a normalized column for S_CONTACT.FST_NAME.
    This is causing the performance issue.
    When I check the configuration in Tools for Contact BC's First Name field, it is configured as follows.
    Join = S_CONTACT
    Column = FST_NAME.
    I do not understand, Why it is still querying in S_POSTN_CON.
    Any suggestions on how to fix this issue to make the Query to be performed on S_CONTACT.FST_NAME?
    Regards
    Vamshi

    Hi Vamshi,
    As Robert mentioned, there just happens to be a number of things that need to be analyzed prior to changing the shape of the buscomp that triggers that sql.
    If this siebel performance issue occurs on a production environment, you should certainly look at the performance trend/characteristics of that sql over time and assess its the impact on your business community (...), then carefully identify its -true- root-cause, implement a fix and validate it against a production-like environment in order to verify there is no regression associated with it; once the fix is deployed on your production system, you want to monitor its benefit overtime and on a 24x7 basis…all this may sound very generic yet good practices.
    If you are looking at -effectively- solving this siebel peformance issue (and others...) in a timely manner, best is to have your Siebel Teams 1)use a Siebel-specific performance monitoring software technology built by Siebel Architects (like GMT v1.8.5, more info @ www.germainsoftware.com) that is able to collect 24x7 all the data needed for root-cause analysis(and more..), and 2)have senior siebel architects (like Robert's team) that have successfully solved tones and severe performance and scalability issues for many years, provide technical guidance to your team throughout the resolution process.
    Siebel CRM is a great CRM software solution that is very complex. Every "switch you turn on/off", every customization you built into it may generate performance issues if it is not carefully implemented, optimized, tested...and monitored 24x7 once it is deployed onto your production system.
    Good luck w/ this..
    Regards,
    Yannick Germain
    CEO & Founder
    GERMAIN SOFTWARE llc
    Complete Siebel Performance Monitoring Tool
    21 Columbus Avenue, Suite 221
    San Francisco, CA 94111, USA
    Cell: +1-415-606-3420
    Fax: +1-415-651-9683
    [email protected]
    http://www.germainsoftware.com

  • Production order being cancelled

    I am notcing on SAPB1 that I am finding production orders being cancelled. I can't understand why this is happening.  I noticed a few users who names appeared would not have access to cancelling these orders.
    Thanks

    Hello again Marc...maybe a bit of explanation and background since you are new to SAP B1 (I responded to your September posting in the training section a bit ago).
    All historial tables in SAP B1 start with an "A".  These historical tables contain some of the informatioin you see when you use the command line Tools > Change Log (for instance when you have a Sales Order being displayed or maybe some other other document/window). 
    So to see all of the historical tables you have available to you in SAP B1, do the following:
    On the command line (top line of screen) select Tools > Queries > Query Generator.  Once you have the Query Generator up, enter "A*" in the upper left hand corner (the asterik brings up all tables starting with A). Use the "Tab" key on your keyboard and a new smaller window will appear called "Choose From List", and you will see all of the historical tables (change log) information you have available for you to write queries in order to find the type of information you are looking for.  If you double click on the word "Description" in the "Choose From List" window it will sort the tables in alpabetical order by name under that column.  Scroll down to find "Production Orders" and...
    Sorry to say, Production Orders are not there - why SAP does not have a historical table of changes to a production order is not known to me.  It is even more suprising when you consider that Production Orders have a financial and reporting impact.  But that is for SAP to answer why there is no Prod Ord history.
    I guess in short terms, there is no way to find out who cancelled a production order.
    However, if you are planning on doing other research into other documents (ie, Sales Orders, AP Invoices, etc) that have changed, you might need to have special transaction codes to really decipher the results.  That is a whole other topic.
    How are the new digs going? 
    Good Luck - Zal

  • Duplicate requisitions being generated.

    I have two issues that are similar:
    ***FIRST -
    On 5/2/08 I cut a PO (4500113566) for Material 1000067027 (requisition 100213878). 
    A few days later another requisition was generated (100216117)  for the exact same Material.  Min/Max on the Material master is set to 1 and 1, there are no reservations and no work order assigned.
    ***SECOND -
    On 4/28/2008 I cut a PO (4500113270) for the following materials and
    quantities:
    MM 1000071901 (req# 100214520) Qty 3
    MM 1000071902 (req# 100214521) Qty 2
    MM 1000071903 (req# 100214522) Qty 2
    A few days later duplicate reservations were generated for the exact same materials.  With no work orders or reservations assigned and the Min / Max levels set to the appropriate levels.
    MM# 1000071901 (req# 100215638) - qty 1  Min/Max 1/1 MM# 1000071902 (req# 100215639) - qty 2 Min/Max 2/2 MM# 1000071903 (req# 100215640) - qty 2 Min/Max 2/2
    We need to find out why duplicate reqs are being generated.

    Hi Reinhardt,
    I am not sure please give it a try, Auto Syndication Task Delay (seconds) Integer.  Default is 0. Check if it helps..
    Set it to 0 if you have set any other parameter, see Figure 87. The MDSS-specific Report Detail pane page 279/403
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwmdm71/helpdata/en/4b/71608566ae3260e10000000a42189b/MDMConsole71.pdf
    It may be also possible because of Bug, let's have input from others if it works else i would suggest to raise an OSS Note to SAP
    Regards,
    Mandeep Saini

  • How much Redo log is being generated by a user sesssion?

    How can find which user session is creating the highest redolog entries and how much rego log is being generated?

    1) Query V$SESS_IO. This view contains the column BLOCK_CHANGES which indicates how much blocks have been changed by the session. High values indicate a session generating lots of redo.
    The query you can use is:
    SQL> SELECT s.sid, s.serial#, s.username, s.program,
    2 i.block_changes
    3 FROM v$session s, v$sess_io i
    4 WHERE s.sid = i.sid
    5 ORDER BY 5 desc, 1, 2, 3, 4;
    Run the query multiple times and examine the delta between each occurrence of BLOCK_CHANGES. Large deltas indicate high redo generation by the session.
    2) Query V$TRANSACTION. This view contains information about the amount of undo blocks and undo records accessed by the transaction (as found in the USED_UBLK and USED_UREC columns).
    The query you can use is:
    SQL> SELECT s.sid, s.serial#, s.username, s.program,
    2 t.used_ublk, t.used_urec
    3 FROM v$session s, v$transaction t
    4 WHERE s.taddr = t.addr
    5 ORDER BY 5 desc, 6 desc, 1, 2, 3, 4;
    Run the query multiple times and examine the delta between each occurrence of USED_UBLK and USED_UREC. Large deltas indicate high redo generation by the session.
    You use the first query when you need to check for programs generating lots of redo when these programs activate more than one transaction. The latter query can be used to find out which particular transactions are generating redo.

  • Test-OutlookConnectivity WARNING: An unexpected error has occurred and a Watson dump is being generated: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

    Hi All,
    When we do a test-outlookconnectivity -protocol:http the result is a success but then we get the following:
    ClientAccessServer   ServiceEndpoint                               Scenario                           
    Result  Latency
    (MS)
    xxxxxxxxxxxx... xxxxxxxxxxxxxx                 Autodiscover: Web service request.  Success   46.80
    WARNING: An unexpected error has occurred and a Watson dump is being generated: Object reference not set to an instance
     of an object.
    Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
        + CategoryInfo          : NotSpecified: (:) [Test-OutlookConnectivity], NullReferenceException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : System.NullReferenceException,Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.TestOutlookConnectivityTask
    So it looks like it's not completing successfully.
    I can't find anything on this in particular, and don't really know how to go about solving it - We are fully up to date, Exchange 2010 Sp2 with Rollup 5-v2
    Any help appreciated!

    hi,
    I have the same issue also on Exchange 2010 SP2 RU5v2
    I ran your command and get the below
    [PS] C:\Installs\report\Activesync>Test-OutlookConnectivity -Protocol:http |FL
    RunspaceId                  : ebd2c626-1634-40ad-a17e-c9a713d1a62b
    ServiceEndpoint             : autodiscover.domain.com
    Id                          : Autodiscover
    ClientAccessServer          : CAS01.domain.com
    Scenario                    : Autodiscover: Web service request.
    ScenarioDescription         :
    PerformanceCounterName      :
    Result                      : Success
    Error                       :
    UserName                    : Gazpromuk.intra\extest_645e41faa55f4
    StartTime                   : 8/21/2013 4:08:50 PM
    Latency                     : 00:00:00.1250048
    EventType                   : Success
    LatencyInMillisecondsString : 125.00
    Identity                    :
    IsValid                     : True
    WARNING: An unexpected error has occurred and a Watson dump is being generated: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
    Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
        + CategoryInfo          : NotSpecified: (:) [Test-OutlookConnectivity], NullReferenceException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : System.NullReferenceException,Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.TestOutlookConnectivityTask
     Any help would be greatly appreciated, I also get random failures of OWA, EAS and web services, very frustrating
    I have no errors in the app event log
    thanks
    Faisal Saleem Windows Systems Analyst 07595781867

  • Site Web Analytics - no usage data being generated

    Hello all:
    I have a SharePoint Foundation 2013 farm with 2 WFE - 1 Search Server and 1 DB server.  Search Service Application has been configured and functioning properly.  Usage and health Data Service Application has been created and started.  Usage
    data collection is enabled and the "Analytics Usage" check box is checked.  Usage Data Import and Usage Data Processing timer jobs are scheduled and run successfully.
    But, I still get the following error when I go to the Site Web Analytics "A web analytics report is not available for this site. Usage processing may be disabled on this server or the
    usage data for this site has not been processed yet."
    After doing some research, some folks have suggested the following which has to do with manually enabling the receivers via powershell - which I have done but still no report and same error. 
    http://geekswithblogs.net/bjackett/archive/2013/08/26/powershell-script-to-workaround-no-data-in-sharepoint-2013-usage.aspx
    Other Internet searches indicate that Web Analytics Reports is no longer available in SharePoint Foundation 2013:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chandru/archive/2013/08/31/sharepoint-2013-web-analytics-report-where-is-it.aspx
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/63099/where-is-the-web-analytics-service-in-sharepoint-2013
    There is also a TechNet question which indicate that "Microsoft Support confirmed me there's a bug in SharePoint Foundation 2013 in the Database that's going to be fixed in the June or August CU"
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/5372109c-8a6e-4d31-aa34-13b6cbde52cf/sharepoint-foundation-2013-web-analytics?forum=sharepointgeneral
    But, there is no resolution if this bug has been addressed or not.
    Therefore, I would really like to know what the deal is with this issue.  At the moment, I do not see any usage data being generated on any of the SharePoint Foundation servers in the farm.
    Please advise.
    Thank you,
    Rumi

    Hi Rumi,
    Find a same issue internaly which says that the links Site Web Analytics is no longer valid in SharePoint 2013 Foundation due to the changes in analytics service application architecture, so you may need the SharPoint enterprise edition for using
    this feature. 
    Symptom
    - Recently, we upgraded to SharePoint Foundation 2013 from WSS 3.0. In SharePoint Foundation 2013 sites, we see the option to click on Site Web Analytics reports but when we click on it, we get an error.
    - Clicking on Site Web Analytics reports from Site Settings \ Site Actions produces the error: “A web analytics report is not available for this site. Usage processing may be disabled on this server or the usage data for this site has not been processed yet.”
    - We have ensured we have logging enabled (multiple categories)
    - Example Site: http://sharepoint2/sites/IT/Projects/SAP/_layouts/15/usageDetails.aspx
    Cause
    By Design
    1) The links in Site Settings from a site collection are no longer valid in SharePoint 2013 (due to change in Analytics Service application architecture changes...part of Search Service now)
    2) SharePoint Foundation 2013 does not support Usage Reporting Analytics
    Resolution
    o Purchase a license for SharePoint Server 2013 Enterprise, and build out a farm for it (the Foundation SKU cannot be upgraded in-place to Server).
    o Once built up, you could copy your databases over and attach them to the Server farm and do your cutover.
    o Going forward from there, you would be able to have access to the Usage reports.
    Also as you have found that msdn blog with the explenation that it is not available in SPF 2013.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chandru/archive/2013/08/31/sharepoint-2013-web-analytics-report-where-is-it.aspx
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj819267.aspx#bkmk_FeaturesOnPremise
    Thanks,
    Daniel Yang
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support

  • How to block production order creation when maintenance order is generated.

    Hi All,
    Kindly share how to block production order generation when maintenance order is generated.

    Integration between PP module and PM module
    PP/PM Workcenter Integration
    There are many threads & documents available. Please do some search.

  • Re: Who can I complain to about a new order being ...

    Ordered on 5/05/2015, online, via a Quidco referral. £160 cashback, £50 SB voucher promised.
    Delivery of equipment date missed.
    Phoned BT, told "order being processed, don't worry"
    Original connection date? 15/05/2015
    Requested to keep the existing landline number. Told this was okay, would be switched 24 hours after BB activation.
    16/05/2015 - no connection. no hub. Called BT, still no equipment. There was a problem, because fibre was already active, with previous account holder.
    15/05/2015 connection date changed to a new date of 26/05/2015.
    Had to do a completely new order over the phone. New problems now because NOT ONLINE ORDER want us to pay more.....
    We received the "delivery" we were waiting home for - a box that was designed to fit through the letterbox....landed on the doormat. No need to wait home....
    Existing BB connection cut off on 26/05/2015
    Broadband was supposed to be reconnected on 27/05/15.
    An engineer called on his mobile to gain access. We had not been told one was attending/required. We were not at home either.
    The job was eventually rebooked for 1/06/15. The engineer arrived at 8.25am, was there for 5 minutes, left for about 25 minutes (cup of tea i dare say) and then returned, and everything was working. Well, everything but the TV.
    The same issues as the OP, paid 1 years line rental up front, via a credit card, paid £36.95 connection and delivery for the fibre/hub. No payments were taken, fortunately. TV package was ordered at the same time too. Its 04/06 now, still no TV.
    Still waiting 9 days after original BB install date, no TV equipment. (It's supposed to be here tomorrow, the 5th June, fingers crossed) 1 month after order (not bad by others stories, but still 3 weeks later than original date.)
    There have been additional issues. Lengthy phone calls as the order is now "a telephone order", not an "online order" - so we are troubled about losing the £160 Quidco cashback.....and the £50 SB voucher. We have been assured by two people on the phone that we will receive these amounts.....but we have also been lied to as many times too.
    Received email detailing "Activation fee Infinity 1 option 1 £30, Activation fee infity 1 £30, total to pay £60
    Phoned BT, told this was an error they said they would remove it from the bill
    Received a bill today, DOUBLE activation charge for same product STILL ON THE BILL.
    Wanted to pay 12 MONTHS line rental up front, TOLD BT REPEATEDLY. But you won't sort it out for us.
    Why should I pay the first months line rental and then another 12 months up front when you get around to sorting it out, effectively tying myself into a 13 month contract? I may want to leave, after all, everything goes up in price when the 12 months discounts end......
    Renumbering? 3 or 4 phone calls to BT. Still not done. 30 second phone call today says it will be done "tomorrow, but after midnight" Thats the days AFTER tomorrow then?
    The whole process has been nothing but stress. It took over half an hour on the phone just two days ago, to sort out the mess with the missing TV package.
    Ordered the TV package online as part of the "QUIDCO" deal. No activation fee mentioned. Order confirmation received - no activation for TV package mentioned.
    Latest call to sort TV package, tells me £35.00 activation fee. The guy had no idea what we had already "ordered" - it looks as though you don't actually keep records of what people order at all??
    Original TV package confirmed as "BT Sport Albertz" package. He apparently after working at BT for 20 years, had never heard of this TV package. He denied its existence. Its on my email.
    I only wanted the Netflix (£6.99, two screens) and no additional TV channels. Online, the activation is currently showing £19.00 I cannot remember seeing one, and it hasn't been mentioned. Who knows if it wasn't on special offer the day I ordered? Your offers change constantly. He says he has to put £35, but ask for it to be changed to £19 because it was originally online order. We have not received confirmation of these prices yet.
    So to summarise. Pathetic customer service. Failed communication. Lies. Lack of decent record keeping. Pricing changing. Overcharging.
    £30 too much STILL on first bill.
    £35 instead of £19 for activation of TV, not yet received or confirmed.
    Lost discount because you REFUSED TO SORT OUT LINE RENTAL SAVER. (£33.98 loss)
    If I pay this now, on month 2, I am forced into 13 month contract with yourselves resulting in further losses due to increased costs)
    Potential loss of a)£160 Quidco referall due to fractured ordering. b)Sainsbury Voucher of £50 because offer has changed since original order date.
    Amount of stress - £ priceless.
    Yet to see if TV package arrives and is connected. But because TV package is now running a week behind the contract dates of the broadband, this will mean that if I cancel the BB after 12 months, I will not be able to use the TV package, as it WONT WORK. So, BT have you ensured I suffer further losses?  The phone line was switched over on the 25th May, BB on the 1st June and now TV should be 5th June.  If it arrives/works.  So who is paying for my 13 days over contract that is being enforced by yourselves, since I will be forced to keep the phone to keep the BB (at £10.50 extra) to keep the TV working? And are you, at that time, going to try to make me pay the £13.50 for the BT sport that I don't want?
    What do we do? Because I am sick to death of trying to communicate with people in India. They're lovely, but they really don't understand me when I'm rabbitting down the phone 100 miles per hour because I'm wound up at having to explain the same thing over and over. Why can't we just email you? Or is this a job for the Ombudsman. This is really poor service.

    the ombudsman does not deal with individual complains although they would take a note of your pronlem
    only people that can help here are the forum mods who are BT employees  they will post a contact us link 
    After completing the email NOT PM then you join a queue of other customers waiting for mod help. The mods will get back to you in 3/5 working days either by phone or email
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • "The report is being generated. Please try again later. " for last 4 hours

    Hi,
    I am try to check the report function which the azure portal has for Azure Active Directory Premium. However, it's showing "The report is being generated. Please try again later." everywhere for
    4 hours already.
    Is there anybody can help me to figure it out what's happen?  Maybe I miss something?
    Thanks!
    Kevin

    Hello,
    Since we have not heard back from you we are archiving the thread.
    Please let us know if you are still facing the issue.
    Regards,
    Neelesh

  • BPM alert not being generated

    Hi guys,
    I'm having quite a little trouble in doing one thing which has been done for several times but which is giving  me a hard time...
    I've created a bpm process which in an error condition will trigger a simple alert.
    I've tested the process and everything goes allright, except the alert. What is happening? Well, the alert is not being sent to my inbox. Why? Maybe because the alert is not being generated.
    I've went to sxmb_moni_bpe and everything is OK. I can see the message of the alert being fired. After that I went to slg1 to see if my alert is being generated, and the answer is no. It's not being generated....
    I've gone through Michal's blogs and everything was checked...The question is, if I execute RSALERTTEST with my alert category, the alert is generated and send to my inbox. Do you have any ideas?
    Thanks a lot for your attention

    Hi,
    Yes the job scheduling is needed only for Sp14 and below.
    Can you recheck if the Alert is actually getting triggered or not in the BPM in the control step? Make sure that you have given the correct Alert Category in your Control Step and also, make sure that the recipient in your alert as well as the Alert Inbox entry you are seeing is the same.
    Finally, refresh the Alert Inbox.
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Third Party Sales Order not generating a PR when going on Credit Block

    Hello Generous People,
    We are having a problem with creating 3rd Party Sales Orders and generating a PR when the customer goes on a credit block and the is subsequently released from there credit block. The system enters a loop of creating a PR and then deleting it once the sales order saved and then place the sales order back on credit block. The Credit Management system has been setup to cause a block for certain fields.
    We have looked at the OSS Notes that are recommended by SAP, for example 100861, 396791, etc. However we are implementing SAP ECC 6.0 with all the latest updates. I was looking at OVB5 and VOFM, but I have had no luck with these as well.
    Thank you in advance for your help or advice.

    Hi Jurijs,
    Have you checked LVKMPFZ1, LVKMPFZ2 & LVKMPFZ3 to find out if there is any code for credit checks and blocks in these user exits.  Also please check FORM USEREXIT_AVAIL_CHECK_CREDIT under include MV45AFZF to find out if there is any code which is entered to not allow the availability check for blocked sales orders and therefore stopping the transfer of requirements inthe form of PR generation.
    Don't worry about going into ECC 6.0. Once you will start the upgrade process on ECC 6.0, you will come to know a set of transaction codes which you can run into the system to find out the non standard ABAP code changes which exists in your SAP landscape.

  • Duplicate planned order is generated with  one sales order item.

    dear :
    when the production order is confirmed with sales order item.the other new planned order is generated.
    the   requiremet quantity of sales order item  is  1,but the custstock  is 2 .display exception:26. in md04.
    please help me analyze it .
    best regards.

    Hi
    Please check rescheduling horizon in OPPQ(by default it would be 100).
    May be you would have shifted the dates of production order after converting from planned order which had crossed rescheduled horizon. This would generate additional planned order to maintain initial dates.
    If this is the case, increase Rescheduling horizon.
    Regards,
    Krishna Mohan

Maybe you are looking for