Mismatch in GR value

GR is happening @ some wrong value other than the price mentioned in the PO. During First GR, it was correct and during subsequent cancellation and GR the values r wrong.
1. PO Details:
Mat A     Qty : 2,  Net Price : 200 USD / piece
2. GR (MIGO)
Mat A    Qty 1  ,  date: 10/11/2008,  GR Value : 200 USD -
Correct
3. Cancel GR (MBST)
Mat A     Qty 1    date: 03/12/2008    GR Value : 195 USD----
Incorrect
4. GR (MIGO)
Mat A    Qty 1  ,  date: 10/02/2009,  GR Value : 197 USD -
INCorrect

Dear,
1. PO Details:
Mat A Qty : 2, Net Price : 200 USD / piece
Check the price in MMR when you created PO.
2. GR (MIGO)
Mat A Qty 1 , date: 10/11/2008, GR Value : 200 USD -
Correct
Check the price in MMR when you created GRN.
3. Cancel GR (MBST)
Mat A Qty 1 date: 03/12/2008 GR Value : 195 USD----
Incorrect
Check the price in MMR when you Cancelled GRN as per document date.
4. GR (MIGO)
Mat A Qty 1 , date: 10/02/2009, GR Value : 197 USD -
INCorrect
Check the price in MMR when you did GRN as per document date.
This happened due to price change in MMR, Moving average price keeps on changing.
Regards
Utsav

Similar Messages

  • Task Total Slack Calculated values mismatching with the values in reporting database

    Hi,
    We require 'Task Total Slack' as one of the items in a report for Project Server 2010. We're developing the reports using SSRS wherein the SQL Queries are fired on the reporting database of Project Server 2010.
    We've come across a situation wherein the total slack values from reporting database for tasks are mismatching with the values that are seen in either PWA or Project Professional for total slack field. We also could not find a consistent factor by which
    the slack is multiplied for reflecting in the database in case the Slack in days was being converted into Hours in reporting databse.
    Is there a definite way that these values are being represented in reporting database which is quite different from the way these values are seen in Project Professional? Please help resolving this issue.

    Hi Abhijit PS,
    Can you give an example of the mismatch? Also you could tell us if this is happening for all tasks and all projects. Your concern may be seen from 2 different points of view:
    Either this is indeed a bug with a slack of 2 days for example in Project Pro and 4 days in your report from the reporting DB. In this case, you should check if the projects have been published correctly and if the Reporting DB is correctly sync'ed with
    the draft DB.
    Or it could be the normal behavior and it is just a matter of finding why. For example, the durations are stored in the DB in minutes, meaning that a 1day duration might be stored as 480 if you have 8 working hours in a day (8*60).
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller |

  • BO XI 3.1 DeskI report Calculation mismatch in record values

    Hi ,
    I have an Calculation issue in one report after migrated from BO 5.1.6 to BO XI 3.1.
    After refreshing two reports parallelly, BO XI 3.1 report 1st 3 records of two columns are not at all there in BO 5.1.6 report.
    in XI 3.1 i am getting 3 more records compare 5.1.6.
    And out of that one column recod values is not matching with 5.1.6, but these record values Sum of total is matching.
    (Ex: Here is the report output im getting with mismatches
    BO XI 3.1         BO 5.1.6
    Age Value
    0        5             
    3        5
    4        5
    5        5
    6        5
    temp   5
    Total   5
    BO 5.1.6
    Age Value
    6         1
    temp   4
    Total   5
    I have checked for the filters,hided columns, formulas. Both are looking same.
    Cany anyone suggest me for a solution.
    Thanks in advance,
    Krishna

    Im trying to copy the output im getting again, format is getting changed after i submit
    BO XI 3.1               BO 5.1.6     
    Age     Value          Age      Value
    0     5          6     1
    3     5          temp     4
    4     5               
    5     5               
    6     5               
    temp      5               
    Total   5          Total   5

  • Report Preview Mismatching with Database Value .

    Dear Friends ,
    I am designing very simple report with 7 columns . To check with report i just hard coded parameter value in command .  when i am executing same query in back end every thing is fine and i am getting correct result , but when i run from report ,value is mismatching . attached screen shot for your reference ,
    please suggest . i am using oracle 11g and crystal report version 13.

    Hi Sriram,
    Have you tried using the same query (with hard coded values) in a Command Object in CR?
    Do you see same values as the database?
    Also, which value has been hard-coded in place of the prompt?
    -Abhilash

  • Mismatch in excise values during STO

    Hi All,
    Actually when we are refering the excise invoice in the receiving depo in MIGO transaction  then there is a mismatch in the excise values in some line items. Kindly let me know the reasons for the same.
    Regards,
    Roshan Krishna

    s

  • Mismatch in output values in the table

    Hi All,
    I am facing a situation which is very weird. I have a BAPI to which i provide the following inputs:
    1. FromDate
    2. ToDate
    3. Material Numbers (As a list)
    4.Plant
    and in the output from the BAPI is a internal table which gives the Quantity for all the material numbers which have been passed to the BAPI.
    After this, I have exposed the BAPI as a WebService and consumed in my program.
    When the BAPI is executed in the R/3 the output is fine giving 4 values, whereas, when i test the webservice using the WSNavigator, I am only getting 1 value. This problem has started recently.
    Kindly let me know the reason and also the way to come out of this problem.
    Regards,
    Poojith MV

    Hi
    Check the web service by debugging weather the list of values coming after executing the BAPI.
    I think the result value has been overwritten.
    Check the property of output parameter given as list in web service.
    Kind Regards
    Mukesh

  • AW01N - Mismatch in Aquition value and the transactional details

    *Dear Gurus*,
    I am facing a peculiar problem in Assets. When I am viewing any asset via AW01N, the total of APC transactions is not matching with the details as shown in transaction details given below.
    I want to know, from where I can get the document wise break-up of the APC transaction value to identify the error. Kindly advise.
    Regards
    Raheem

    Hi,
    First please make a recalculation of values.
    If there is no change,  the 2 reports RACORR110_B and RACORR55 are used to correct the inconsistency.      
    please see the following link:                              
    https://websmp203.sap-ag.de/fiaa-faq                        
      press "Correction and Maintenance Reports" (below)        
    Here you will find:                                         
       - RACORR110.txt                                          
       - RACORR55.txt                                                                               
    The relevant note is 366848.                                                                               
    At first please run the report RACORR110. Please check the  field ANLC-ANSWL bevor and after running the report.  The report RACORR110_B accumulates the values of the asset line items  and writes the result in the field
    ANLC-ANSWL.          
    Attention: At first please run RACORR110 with test flag (makes no database update)                                                                               
    After this, please start the report RACORR55 to forward the values to the next fiscal year.                                                
    Regards Bernhard

  • Invoice Value Mismatch in Output Printouts

    Dear Experts,
    We are facing a problem on invoice printouts as it is mismatched with oprginal values in the system, also we have checked in sales order printouts it's accurate with orginal values but the same value in not updating in invoice outputs.
    Actual condition price should get print on all the outputs, please note that the problem occurs only with old invoices or invoices which already printed in past
    Could anyone please let me know what is the root cause for this.and what is the solution to get the actual prices into invoice outputs.
    Thanks in advance.
    JA
    Edited by: javeed ahmed on Oct 29, 2010 3:44 PM

    It sounds like you have a problem with the print output layout set u2013either the sapscript or smartform or adobe form.  As the problem only exists with old invoices, I would look for some u201Chard-codingu201D on the layout set that dos not properly handle the way your pricing procedure  currently sends the data.
    A u201Cvalue-mismatchu201D could result from the layout set using an obsolete subtotal from your pricing procedure. 
    I would have your ABAP support sit down with your SD person and scrutinize the communication structures sent to the layout set.
    Regards,
    Ken

  • Oracle database does not start timezone mismatch

    Hi
    I am new on oracle database. My server has restart and now when I try to start oracle database I get this error can anyone help to come out this error.
    oracle@host [~]# /home/u01/app/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/bin/emctl start dbconsole
    TZ set to US/Michigan
    Oracle Enterprise Manager 10g Database Control Release 10.2.0.1.0
    Copyright (c) 1996, 2005 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    http://server:1158/em/console/aboutApplication
    Timezone mismatch: The agentTZRegion value (US/Michigan) in
    /home/u01/app/oracle/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/database/sysman/config/emd.properties
    does not match the current environment TZ setting(US/Michigan).
    The dbconsole cannot run with this mismatch.
    If US/Michigan is the correct timezone, set your timezone environment variable to US/Michigan and repeat the 'emctl start dbconsole' operation.
    If US/Michigan is not the correct timezone, make sure that the timezone in your environment is correct, and then run the following command in your local Oracle Home: 'emctl resetTZ agent'
    The output of this command will include detailed instructions to follow, to correct the mismatch.
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: user6550464 on Mar 29, 2009 11:46 PM

    And now You see the reason for error message.
    emctl thinks that time zone is US/Michigan (its from emd.properties file)
    but on linux timezone is set to Asia/Calcutta
    Yoiu should understand which one timezone is correct. If it's US - then talk with server sysadmin, he will set correct one timezone on linux.
    If correct one is on linux - then follow metalink note how to change timezone for agent.
    If none of them are correct, then You will have to follow both steps.

  • Report Painter report showing wrong values

    Hi,
    We have a report painter report Y_DN3_47000280 which is Inventory by Plant. We have a plant which is sold out and is not working anymore under the company. But the report is still showing postings and values in tune of 183000...Can you please advise what is wrong and what setting is missing?
    Thanks,
    Prithwi.

    Hi Dianne,
    Thanks for the details. We checked MBEW table. There's a mismatch of the values between MBEW and Y_DN3_47000280 report. MBEW contains $109.6 and the Y_DN3_47000280 report contains $180333.00 for the plant.
    Can you pls tell from where these values are populating. The plant has been closed 3 months back.
    Thanks,
    Prithwi.

  • Org level tab values

    Hello,
    In one of the single roles, field BUKRS was individually maintained and hence there is a mismatch between the values in the org level values tab. To make it uniform, how do I reset BUKRS so that it is filled with values from the org level tab? I did a select all, delete of the BUKRS field values then saved and generated the role but the values are not populated.
    Any inputs is appreciated.
    Mani

    Hi,
    If you delete the BUKRS filed values from the object using the delete button that will show up only in the manually maintained object BUKRS filed value.  Delete the same using the trash icon.  Immediately the org level value will popup in the BUKRS orgfiled. (No need to generate or save the role to see the BUKRS value from Org level)
    As you have mentioned you have "select all " no such option. individually you have delete for each BUKRS filed in the objects if you maintained manually.
    Regards,
    Shrinivasan. KV

  • Profitcenter wise data mismatch In T-code FAGLL03 & S_PL0_86000030

    Data Mismatch In two Report
    for e.g.
    IN GL 610120 FOR the Period of 01.04.2009 to 30.06.2009
    T-CODE T-CODE
    Profit center          *FAGLL03*                *S_PL0_86000030* -( General -> G/L Account Balances -> G/L Account Balances (New))
    1                     338,521.50 ;              338,521.50
    2                     115,104.00 ;              453,625.50
    3                     406,985.25 ;              860,610.75
    4                     345,215.50 ;            1,205,826.25
    Total               1,205,826.25 ;            1,205,826.25
    The Problem is In one HO profit center both T-code Balance Is Tally Rest of three are not matching and in four profit center is showing total of all
    we want data profit center wise data for quarterly balances sheet which is showing In GL Account
    what is the reason data showing mismatch ?
    How can we get the proper data which will be same in both T-code?
    any report setting is required?
    please guide.

    Hi,
    there is no mismatch between the values. When you have a closer look you will see that FAGLL03 shows the period values whereas report S_PL0_86000030 shows cumulated values:
    Profit center          FAGLL03                S_PL0_86000030 -( General -> G/L Account Balances -> G/L Account Balances (New))
    1                          338,521.50 ;              338,521.50
    2                          115,104.00 ;              453,625.50
    total in period 2    453,625.50
    3                          406,985.25 ;              860,610.75
    total in period 3    860,610.75
    4                          345,215.50 ;            1,205,826.25
    total in period 4 1,205,826.25 ;            1,205,826.25
    Cheers,
    Daniela

  • Msg must be displayed when mismatch occurs

    Hi.,
    I am using jdev 11.1.1.5
    I had created Glhd,GLln EO's with corresponding VO's
    I had also created an transient attribute in GLln listed below
    Debitamt object.getRowset.sum("GLln.GjlDebitAmt")
    creditamt object.getRowset.sum("GLln.GjlCreditAmt")
    I had also created a viewlink
    Glhd.bu = GLln.bu
    I had dragged and dropped GLhd as adf:Forms GlLn as adf:table
    My Scenario:
    I need to display a msg if there is an mismatch in the values of Debitamt and creditamt

    one suggestion is to create a before phase Listener and display the message in the before render phase.
    in your pagem select the view node from the structure window, select BeforePhase attribute and create your own method
        public void beforeRender(PhaseEvent phaseEvent) {
            // check your condition, if true show the message
            int RENDER_RESPONSE = PhaseId.RENDER_RESPONSE.getOrdinal();
            if (phaseEvent.getPhaseId().getOrdinal()== RENDER_RESPONSE) {
                String messageText = "Add your message text";
                FacesMessage fm = new FacesMessage(messageText);
                fm.setSeverity(FacesMessage.SEVERITY_INFO);
                FacesContext context = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
                context.addMessage(null, fm);
            }Edited by: M.Jabr on Oct 21, 2011 1:00 PM

  • Credit check issue in third party order

    Dear all,
    We are facing some issues related to credit management data for one of our customer. I need your valuable inputs for below mentioned queries-
    1. As a genaral question- When we releases a SO through VKM* How the system calculated the " Released Credit Value of the document".
    2- For one of the customers, the FD33 shows a Sales value X USD. As i see the split of this sales value , this X USD amounts to OPEN DELIVERIES. Both Open So and Open billing are zero. We tried to check with no. of tcodes to find out the open values but no such Open delv document is appeared.
    In VC/2, it only shows Open SO, no open deliveries are there.
    So i tried with simulation program RVKRED88, and found 5 third party Sales documents , against which some value is coming under the Open delivery value and it sums up to the value as coming in FD33.
    I have a few questions on this-
    > All the SO in output are Third party SO, against which PO has been created, ( Third party So> PR> PO> MIRO--> billing) and all are in status OPEN, so how come they are showing value in OPEN DELIVERY ?
    --> The value appearing against these third party SO is Not equal to items value/net value, it is a complete different value than appearing in SO. But in SO changes history , the same value is coming AS RELEASED CREDIT VALUE. How is it being calculated?
    For eg- for one of the Third party SO , the value coming in RVKRED88 is 29573.53 USD,
                                                                net value in So= 24,120.00 USD, Qty = 6000 PC , Credit price= 4.02 USD
                                                                Credit value of So in VBAk= 29573.53 USD
                                                               SO created , released on 08.July.2011, confirmed schedule line =08.Oct.2011
    Credit settings- Static check + Credit active Item cat and SO ,  Open So and open delv are ticked in credit settings.
    Kindly help in the analysis.
    many thanks in advance for the inputs.

    Hi Dharmendra,
    1.  When we release a sales order using VKM* transaction S066 information structure and OEIKW field is updated which increases open order value.
    2. If there is mismatch in the values of credit related fields run RVKRED77 (Re-organisation of credit in case of update errors) this will update all the credit data for a Payer customer in real time. RVKRED88 is simulation mode.
    3. Updating of values related to credit is controlled by the update group assigned to credit control area. If system is not able to update  using the assigned update group it will automatically try updating using the next update group. Below is the text of SAP Help.
    If a document cannot be processed with the update group you specify, the system determines the next possible update it can carry out. For example, you select Update group 000012 which, at delivery, reduces the open order value and increases the open delivery value. Assume that one item in the order is not relevant for delivery. In this case, the system automatically determines Update group 000018 for this item. Update group 000018 increases the open delivery value for the order item. The system uses the confirmed quantity of delivery-relevant schedule lines to update the order value
    As you know in OVA8 transaction credit control area, Risk category, credit group and currency are assigned to update group.

  • Error in IR document for asset document

    Hi Folks,
    I have a issue with GR IR Clearing.
    I have posted one purchase order for purchase of one asset.
    1) The GR Document has been posted as below:
    Posting key   account                              Amount
    70          140000 (ASSET)                    2906.03
    96          3000100 (GR IR Clearing account)          2906.03-
    (3000100 is a GR IR Clearing account)
    2)     Invoice Receipt document has been posted as below for the above GR document
    Posting key      account      Amount
    31                 1500 (Vendor )                    1039.13-
    86                 3000100 (GR IR Clearing account)     2096.03
    75                 140000 (ASSET)                    1866.90-
    Issue:
    While posting the above IR document by mistakenly the system is hitting Asset Account with an amount of 1866.90- which shouldnu2019t happen. Please let me know where exactly could be the account assignment causing this error.
    Thanks
    B.Venkatesh

    Hi,
    If there is any mismatch of GRIR value and Vendor Invoice value then it will post to asset account...
    Check the vendor invoice once.
    Thanks,
    padmaja

Maybe you are looking for

  • Creating a Link with XML Files

    Hi, I am trying to import a XML file in a table structure following instructions from the Adobe help file (could only find a CS3 one, I am using CS4, the link to it: http://www.adobe.com/designcenter/indesign/articles/indcs3ip_xmlrules.pdf). Now the

  • Text in color in ALV top-of-page

    Hi all, I am using REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY  and using REUSE_ALV_COMMENTARY_WRITE to display top-of-page. I need to show text in top-of-page in BOLD and RED color. I am able to diaply in BOLD by passing slis_listheader-typ = 'H' But I am not able to un

  • Getting my mp3 player to work with rmmod ehci-hcd

    Dear all, I have a sansa fuze mp3 player. It can be configured to be in either MTP or MSC mode; I'm using the second, meaning that the computer should see it as a simple mass storage device. I remember using that a couple of years ago with Debian and

  • Will Microsoft Word ever work with OSX Lion?/Worth switching to iWork just for

    I have the Microsoft Office Suite that I got with my computer, I want to know if it will work with an eventual Lion update before I consider updating to OSX Lion. I would like nothing more than to be able to update, but don't know if I'm willing to j

  • HT1926 iTunes + QuickTime = Problem!

    I just re installed Mac OS X 10.5.8 on a new hard drive on my late 08 MBP. I didn't copy a backup, I just installed it new. The problem I have is that every time I try to open iTunes, I am told that I "need QuickTime 7.5.5". When I run "Software Upda