OBIEE 11.1.1.7 compatibility setting is not supported

Hi,
This was happened on OBI Enterprise Manager login page after upgrade OBIEE version from 11.1.1.5 to 11.1.1.7
Message from webpage
The current compatibility setting is not supported. Disable Compatibility View before running this web page.
I was tried to configure setting on IE8, 9 and 10 but still the same.
So, is it a known issue and anyone has solution on this?

its common issue and the solution is, in IE go to tools -> compatibility view settings you will see a pop-up window from here uncheck the boxes which has Display intranet sites in compatibility view or display all websites in compatibility view(better to uncheck all three check boxes) and also check if you have added any domain to allow the compatible view eg: URL which ends with Oracle.com in http://scjq02.oracle.com:7001/em
after un-checking those above check boxes and removing the domain now reload the page and see

Similar Messages

Getting error when installing OBIEE 11.1.1.6 "Operating system does not support IPV4".

HI,
I am trying to install OBIEE 11.1.1.6 on Windows 7 .
Have created repository successfully ,using the RCU 11.1.1.6 and now tring to install
OBI. I am getting the below error
"Operating system does not support IPV4".
Can anyone please suggest why i am getting this error or
how should i get rid with this error??
Manoj.

Just in case check this Doc ID 1410233.1
~ http://cool-bi.com

OBIEE Error[14041] Nested Aggregation measure are currently not supported

Hi,
Please provide workaround for the OBIEE Error[14041] Error in measure definiion. Nested aggregation measures are currently not supported.
I have two logical columns - Current YTD Invoice Quantity and Prior YTD Invoice Price. I want to create a column which is -
(Current YTD Invoice Quantity * Prior YTD Invoice Price)/ sum(Current YTD Invoice Quantity * Prior YTD Invoice Price)
sum in the denominator should be the sum of all rows returned by the report. So level based measures cannot be used as there are multiple report and dimension used may vary.
Columns Current YTD Invoice Quantity and Prior YTD Invoice Price are already aggregated to Sum.
If I try to do the sum on the physical column while creating logical column, the query is running for 6-7 hours and not giving any result. Both the columns belong to different alias table in physical layer.
Please let me know if you guys know any work around for this issue. Also let me know whether this type of nested aggregation are supported in 11g or not?
Thanks.

Hi Adil,
Yes, I did create a hierarchy for the time dimesion.
No, I was not able to specify the aggregate rule since the source of the logical column is another logical column
But the time hierarchy works for rows that is not based upon the SUM aggregate at the answers level.
Say I have 3 columns: Income,Expense, Bottom Line (formula : Income- Expense)
Income is created based upon a case statement in the Logical Column and
Expense is also created based upon a case statement in the Logical Column.
Income 1000 Rupees
Expense -300 Rupees
Bottom Line 700 Rupees (where the Bottom line is a row based upon the Answers aggregate formula
which is SUM(Income+Expense))
When I add a column year, I get the following output
Income 2009 500 Rs
Income 2008 500 Rs
Expense 2009 -150 Rs
Expense 2008 -150 Rs
Bottom Line 2009 700 Rs
Bottom Line 2008 700 Rs
The Bottom Line doesn't spread across the Year
Hope this helps you to understand what my problems is.
Thank you!

Set SelectItem not supported by RI 1.2 (IllegalArgumentException)

When using a Set (TreeSet) of SelectItems to populate a h:selectOneMenu, selecting an entry in the select box results in an IllegalArgumentException:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
     javax.faces.component.SelectItemsIterator.next(SelectItemsIterator.java:177)
     javax.faces.component.SelectItemsIterator.next(SelectItemsIterator.java:60)
     javax.faces.component.UISelectOne.matchValue(UISelectOne.java:177)
     javax.faces.component.UISelectOne.validateValue(UISelectOne.java:150)
     javax.faces.component.UIInput.validate(UIInput.java:875)
     javax.faces.component.UIInput.executeValidate(UIInput.java:1072)
     javax.faces.component.UIInput.processDecodes(UIInput.java:642)
     javax.faces.component.UIForm.processDecodes(UIForm.java:209)
     javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase.processDecodes(UIComponentBase.java:1015)
     javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase.processDecodes(UIComponentBase.java:1015)
     javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot.processDecodes(UIViewRoot.java:504)
     org.ajax4jsf.component.AjaxViewRoot.access$001(AjaxViewRoot.java:57)
     org.ajax4jsf.component.AjaxViewRoot$1.invokeRoot(AjaxViewRoot.java:260)
     org.ajax4jsf.context.JsfOneOneInvoker.invokeOnRegionOrRoot(JsfOneOneInvoker.java:56)
     org.ajax4jsf.context.AjaxContextImpl.invokeOnRegionOrRoot(AjaxContextImpl.java:173)
     org.ajax4jsf.component.AjaxViewRoot.processDecodes(AjaxViewRoot.java:276)
     com.sun.faces.lifecycle.ApplyRequestValuesPhase.execute(ApplyRequestValuesPhase.java:78)
     com.sun.faces.lifecycle.Phase.doPhase(Phase.java:100)
     com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:118)
     javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:265)
     org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseXMLFilter.doXmlFilter(BaseXMLFilter.java:141)
     org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseFilter.doFilter(BaseFilter.java:281)
     org.apache.myfaces.webapp.filter.ExtensionsFilter.doFilter(ExtensionsFilter.java:147)
     be.banksys.tams.mmi.ForceUTF8Filter.doFilter(ForceUTF8Filter.java:50)
     org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:96)However, the javadoc of UISelectItems (http://java.sun.com/javaee/javaserverfaces/1.2_MR1/docs/api/javax/faces/component/UISelectItems.html) states that the value can be of type "Collection of SelectItem" .
I'm migrating from Myfaces 1.1.5 to RI 1.2 (jsf-1_2_07). (Myfaces does support Set<SelectItem>...)
We use (a lot of) TreeSets with a comparator to be shure that our selectOneMenus are sorted.
It seems to me that adding something like the following code to the next() method of javax.faces.component.SelectItemsIterator would do the trick:
            } else if (value instanceof Set) {
                items = TypedCollections.dynamicallyCastSet((Set) value, SelectItem.class).iterator();
                return (next());Is there a workaround or can this be fixed?
Jo�l

Fix checked in which will be available in tonight's nightly [1], and ultimately will be in 1.2_08.
[1] https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=1703&expandFolder=1703&folderID=0

Disable compatibility setting diablog when open spaces with ie8 and ie9

dear
im developing webcenter spaces portal
when i open it with firefox and chrome everything seems to be ok but when open it with ie8 or ie9 compatibility view a popup dialog appears say that :
the current compatibility view is not supported .disable compatibility view before running this web page.
i need to prevent or hide this popup because customers asked me to do
any suggestions its urgent
best regards

Hi.
Don't know about ADF 11g R2
However with ADF 11g R1 11.1.1.6 exists a patch and a web.xml context param to solve it.
Applying patch and setting next context param in web.xml is solved:
<context-param>
<param-name>oracle.adf.view.rich.HIDE_UNSUPPORTED_BROWSER_ALERTS</param-name>
<param-value>IECompatibilityModes</param-value>
</context-param>Don't know if it runs in ADF 11g R2 apps.
Regards.

Error: Bitdepth and / or color space not supported by threshhold set. Fatal Error!

Running Mac OSX 10.6.4 and using HP Laserjet 1022. When trying to print a .pdf opened by Adobe Reader I get ther above error. Document prints if opened with Preview. Any suggestions? Thanks.

I am trying to use ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_SENSITIVE and
CONCUR_UPDATABLE (using IBM DB2 JDBC 2.0) but I get
run time error :
SQL Exception.SQLState = null Error code = 0 Error
message = Updatable result set is not supported by
this version of the DB2 JDBC 2.0 driver.
Any suggestion or help is appreciated.
Has anyone heard that IBM DB2 implementation does not
support updatable and scroll_sensitive?It gave you a precise error message, and you don't believe the error message, thinking somehow you can get around it anyway, making it support updatable result sets...
You should check out this link:
http://www.hov-hov.dk/you.htm

File compatibility setting in Pref. / composite thumbnail

I would like photoshop to show a file image for the thumbnail (instead the generic lines of type). I know in the pref box I can set the "Maximize File compatibility" to "Always" or Ask, and this will save a flattened version of the file as part of the document. But this greatly increased the file size. I did some checking on 10 layered files ranging from 14Mb to 45Mb. The new file size increased a whopping 35% to 88%. That's a heavy price to pay both on my system here, our back up / archive, CD / DVD burning, and our client systems.
I'm in the process of putting together a browser based image library. To render a image thumbnail it shows the generic lines of type if layered (useless), and a image thumbnail only if "File compatibility" is set to Yes. ( Which greatly increases file size, and cost of storage space).
Is there a way to get a image thumbnail without having to set Maximize File Compatibility to Yes?
It would seem to me that photoshop should be able to create a small, low res flattened version, at a low quality setting, that would be on the kb in size for a thumbnail. And imbed that into the file, vs the bloated composite. I understand the reason for the composite for file compatibailty with previous versions etc. Just not for creating the thumbnail.
I'm hoping some else has more info that I don't.
thanks all...
JeffN

Jeff,
The wording in Preferences > File Handling may have misled you. It says "Image Previews" in connection with creating a file icon despite a file's icon having nothing to do with Finder's preview.
With OS X Photoshop, as long as the preference to create icon is enabled, an icon is generated from the visible composite of the document and is attached to the PSD file (not actually embedded in the file) regardless of the Maximum Compatibility setting. Finder will display the icon.
However, Max Compat has to be enabled for a composite to be stored in the PSD, and it is that composite which Finder reads to generate its preview.
At least that's the case for 8-bit per channel PSD.

What should compatability setting be for 32 bit windows 7

Recently my computer guy switched me from Internet Explorer to Firefox. Since then I have been having problems with computer overheating. I believe it relates to Flash Player used for playing games on facebook. I have researched and found others have had problems with this also. In my researching I looked at Firefox properties and found that the Compatibilities settings show Windows xpService Pack 3 and am wondering why the setting is not Windows 7.
I have done further research and found the CPU is much higher percentage and my computer definitely overheats when I use the flash player playing the games. Could the properties setting be wrong and could it be the problem. If not any suggestion would be appreciated . Thank You

I'm sorry but I reset as advised and no difference ... NOTE HOWEVER... I did not get a 'finish' button to click after doing reset.. a pop up re signing up for newsletter with video came up instead... ??
Re the problem however... I went to facebook and started a game which uses flash player... AND my computer started heating up right away and within a span of 2-3 minutes the CPU shot up to 70% I played for 1/2 hr and cpu stayed up .. When I came off the game (and flash player) it went back down to 1% CPU. Note again this overheating of my computer only started when I came to firefox browser...from Internet Explorer.
question...Should the properties of firefox be changed from compatability xp service pack 3 TO Windows 7 ?? Thanks
I'd appreciate any further help.. to stop this overheating

Firefox ignores Windows 8's compatability setting for high dpi screens.

I recently tried the Windows 8.1 Preview, but then reset my machine to Windows 8 again.
Before this, the first time I installed Firefox, it ran at a low resolution, so all the toolbars and content appeared huge and blurry. I fixed this with the Windows 8 compatibility setting disable display scaling on high DPI settings"
After resetting the machine, and installing Firefox again, it was back to being blurry, so I changed the compatibility setting again, but this time, nothing happened. Even with the setting on, Firefox ignores it. Every other program with this setting works fine, and Firefox worked fine the last time around.
I was advised in the Windows support forums to ask the question here.

You can modify the layout.css.devPixelsPerPx and increase or decrease the value in 0.1 or 0.05 steps to adjust the size of fonts and other elements in Firefox.
*The layout.css.devPixelsPerPx pref is a String value parsed to a float and allows to fine tune the dimensions of all elements (user interface and web pages) more precisely (resolution 0.1 or 0.05).
*Change the default value -1 to 1 to make it work like in previous Firefox versions (100%)
Start with a value of 1 and adjust this value with 0.1 steps or 0.05 for finer adjustments.
*Use values between 1.0 and about 0.5 to reduce elements in size (do NOT go all the way to 0.05!)
*Use values greater than 1.0 to magnify and make elements larger (percentage divided by DPI, % / DPI).
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/about:config
If web pages needs to be adjusted after changing this pref then you can look at the Default FullZoom Level or NoSquint extension.
*Default FullZoom Level: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/default-fullzoom-level/
*NoSquint: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/nosquint/
Use this extension to adjust the font size for the user interface:
*Theme Font & Size Changer: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/

OBIEE 11.1.1.5 Patch Set Bundle 2 - Coming soon?

Hi All,
In a recent SR with Oracle regarding an issue experienced in 11.1.1.6 (Bug 12559158) , they informed me that the issue would be fixed, but in OBIEE 11.1.1.5 Patch Set Bundle 2.
No further details have been given, but I am curious to learn if anyone else has any further information regarding Patch Set Bundle 2 for 11.1.1.5 and what it might fix.
Thanks,
Lance

Response on an SR today:
11.1.1.5.0 BP2 bundle patch bug fixes
Current ETA has slipped - it is now approx. April 6 for four platforms : Linux64, Windows64, AIX64 & Solaris Sparc 64.
This will also affect ETA for remaining four platforms .. approx. 3-4 weeks after above 4 patches are released.

Result set does not fit; it contains too many rows

Dear All,
We are in BI7 and running reports on Excel 2007. Even though number of rows limitation in Excel 2007 is more than 1Million, when I try to execute a report with more than 65k records of output, system is generating output only for 65k rows with message "Result set does not fit; it contains too many rows".
Our Patch levels:
GUI - 7.10
Patch level is 11
Is there any way to generate more than 65000 rows in Bex?
Thanks in advance...
regards,
Raju
Dear Gurus,
Could you please shed some light on this issue?
thanks and regards,
Raju
Edited by: VaraPrasadraju Potturi on Apr 14, 2009 3:13 AM

Vara Prasad,
This has been discussed on the forums - for reasons of backward compatibility I do not think BEx supports more that 65000 rows .... I am still not sure about the same since I have not tried out a query with more that 65K rows on excel 2007 but I think this is not possible...

Setting PDFCompatibility not working when saving a file from the API

Hi,
I am trying to save a PDF file using version 1.3 compatibility using the CS3 API. I am flexible to which Action I use. Right now I am trying to use kAISaveDocumentAsAction.
According to AIPDFFormatAction.h, I can set kAIPDFCompatibilityKey to kAIPDFCompatibility13. However, that same header file indicates that these keys should be used with the kAIExportDocumentAction, not the kAISaveDocumentAsAction.
Not surprisingly, the SaveAs Action works, but saves a PDF in version 1.5 (probably not checking the kAIPDFCompatibilityKey).
I have tried using the kAIExportDocumentAction instead... However, in CS3, the Export action does not support PDF as an output type. Maybe in earlier versions this was different.
Can anyone help? Below is the current code I am using that produces a PDF, but not a version 1.3 PDF.
AIActionParamValueRef valueParameterBlock = NULL;
ActionDialogStatus dialogStatus = kDialogNone;
int result = 0;
result = sAIActionManager->AINewActionParamValue(&valueParameterBlock);
if (valueParameterBlock) {
result = sAIActionManager->AIActionSetString(valueParameterBlock, kAISaveDocumentAsNameKey, outputfilename_final);
result = sAIActionManager->AIActionSetString(valueParameterBlock, kAISaveDocumentAsFormatKey, kAIPDFFileFormat);
result = sAIActionManager->AIActionSetInteger(valueParameterBlock, kAIPDFCompatibilityKey, kAIPDFCompatibility13);
result = sAIActionManager->PlayActionEvent(kAISaveDocumentAsAction, kDialogOff, valueParameterBlock);
result = sAIActionManager->AIDeleteActionParamValue(valueParameterBlock);

Hi,
You can try to right-click and '''Reset''' the '''browser.download.lastDir''' key in [http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config about:config].
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_entries about:config Entries]

Force OBIEE to display attribute as dimension property and not separate dimension

Hello,
I have following question - in my project which utilizes Essbase and OBIEE I am interested in display of attribute as a characteristic of dimension and not as separate dimension.
OBIEE generates following mdx statement:
With
set [_Prod.Manufacturer2] as '[Prod.Manufacturer].Generations(2).members'
set [_Product6] as 'Filter(Descendants([Product], 8), (([Product].CurrentMember.MEMBER_Name = "P3336" OR [Product].CurrentMember.MEMBER_ALIAS = "P3336")))'
select
{ [Measure].[Volume] } on columns,
NON EMPTY {crossjoin({[_Prod.Manufacturer2]},{[_Product6]})} properties MEMBER_NAME, GEN_NUMBER, [Prod.Manufacturer].[MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME], [Prod.Manufacturer].[Memnor], [Product].[MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME], [Product].[Memnor], [Product].[Alias_table_1] on rows
from [APP.DB]
while I am interested in achieving following - where attribute Prod.Manufacturer is displayed as property of Product dimension and not as separate attribute
With
set [_Axis1Set] as '{Filter(Descendants([Product], 8), (([Product].CurrentMember.MEMBER_Name = "P3336" OR [Product].CurrentMember.MEMBER_ALIAS = "P3336")))}'
select
{[Measure].[Volume]} on columns, {[_Axis1Set]} properties [Product].[Prod.Manufacturer],MEMBER_NAME, GEN_NUMBER, [Product].[Memnor], [Product].[Alias_table_1] on rows
from [APP.DB]
OBIEE generates expected syntax for Alias tables, is same possible with attributes?
How ?
thx
Tomek

Thanks heaps for your answer, Vladim!
That's funny, huh? As mentioned, in respect to the Workstatus control, SAP made that functionality available for the Owner property of the Entity dimension (i.e. more than one user can be declared as an owner of a e.g. Cost Center and could hence change a particular Work Status).
Any ideas for a workaround ?
Have a good weekend...
Claus

Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA

Issue Summary
In Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72 and Java 1.8 Update 25 Deployment Rule Sets do not properly launch the latest available version from the JRE6 family when the jpi-version is specified by the RIA. We've noticed this with Oracle Forms and Reports 11g where we have forms that specify Java 1.6 Update 20. We used to be able to specify Java 1.6 Update 26 in our Ruleset, but now the only version a that works in our ruleset is Java 1.6 Update 20 which is the same version requested by the JPI-Version attribute of the jar. The long term solution would be to upgrade Oracle Forms and Reports, however this isn't currently in the cards.
RuleSet.xml Test
Ruleset.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
<ruleset version="1.0+">
<rule>
   <id location="*.javatester.org" />
   <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
</rule>
<ruleset version="1.0+">
<rule>
   <id location="*.internaldomain.name" />
   <action permission="run" version="1.6*" />
</rule>
</ruleset>
Test 1 (Control)
Installed Java Versions:
– 1.7 Update 51 b13 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
– 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
Deployment Ruleset works as expected for both URLs
Test 2
Installed Java Versions:
– 1.7 Update 72 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
– 1.6 Update 26 b03 (both x86 and x64 however x86 is invoked)
The RuleSet works for JavaTester.org however on internaldomain.name we get the following error:
With the trace logging turned on, I suspected the version attribute supplied by the RIA. I was able to trick Java by adding the following to my system deployment.properties file:
deployment.javaws.jre.0.product=1.6.0_20
deployment.javaws.jre.0.path=C\:\\Program Files (x86)\\Java\\jre6\\bin\\javaw.exe
deployment.javaws.jre.0.enabled=true
Because the RIA requests 1.6.0_20 it matches 1.6* from the deployment ruleset sooner than 1.6.0_26. However, if 1.6.0_20 is not available 1.6.0_26 should match according to the Deployment Rule Set documentation:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/jweb/security/deployment_rules.html
The version of the JRE that is used is determined by the following order of precedence:
1. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
2. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches both the version attribute and the version requested by the RIA.
3. The current version of the JRE is used if it is available and matches the version attribute.
4. The latest available version of the JRE is used if it matches the version attribute.
If no version is available that meets the criteria, then the RIA is blocked, and a message is shown to the user. To provide a custom message, include the message element.
As a result:
If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA and 1.6.0_20 is listed in the deployment.properties file, #1 matches.
If Java 1.6.0_20 is listed in the version requested by the RIA, but 1.6.0_20 is NOT listed in the deployment.properties file the #1 SHOULD match, but doesn’t. It used to match up-to and including JRE 1.7 Update 51 however the ruleset appears to no longer match in subsequent versions.
#2 should never match with our current Deployment Ruleset. It would match if we specified 1.7* as a version in the Ruleset.xml.
#3 used to be broken as well after JRE 1.7 Update 51 however this bug has been marked as fixed. See: http://bugs.java.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8032781
I have reproduced this issue with Java 1.7 Update 71, Java 1.7 Update 72, and Java 1.8 Update 25 when one of these versions are installed with Java 1.6 Update 26.

I can't seem to edit this post anymore, for some odd reason.
So here goes;
I found this post in NVIDIA's knowledge base;
When installing an after-market graphics card into a certified Windows 8 PC with UEFI enabled, the s...
The interesting parts in this post are as follows;
When an after-market graphics card is installed into a motherboard with UEFI enabled in the system BIOS, or if the system is a certified Windows 8 PC with Secure Boot enabled, the system may not boot.
UEFI is a new system BIOS feature that is provided on most new motherboards. A UEFI system BIOS is required in order for the Windows 8 Secure Boot feature to work. Secure boot is enabled by default on certified Windows 8 PCs.
In order to get the PC to boot with a graphics card that does not contain UEFI firmware, the end-user must first disable the secure boot feature in the system's SBIOS before installing the graphics card.
Note: Some system SBIOS's incorporate a feature called compatibility boot. These systems will detect a non-UEFI-enabled firmware VBIOS and allow the user to disable secure boot and then proceed with a compatibility boot. If the system contains a system SBIOS the supports compatibility boot, the user will need to disable secure boot when asked during boot process
This leads me to believe that the BIOS update that wrecked my setup was 9SKT58A/9SJT58A, which only contains one change;
"Adds support for updating BIOS from a WIN7 BIOS to a WIN8 BIOS".
I've just ordered a cheap UEFI-compatible GT640 from Gainward, so I hope I'll be able to try that out this weekend.

Message uses a character set that is not supported by the internet service

Does any one have any advice on how to fix this problem?
E-mails sent from my iphone 3G periodically arrive in an unreadable form at the recipient. The body of the e-mail has been replaced with the message "This message uses a character set that is not supported by the internet service...." The problem e-mails also include an attachment that contains an unformatted text file containing the original message surrounded by what appears to be lots of formatting data that is displayed as gibberish.
This occurs sometimes, but not always, even with the same recipients. I am sending e-mail through a G-mail account that is configured on the iphone using IMAP. I have tried the gmail account to use the two available formatting options for mail, but neither fixes the problem.
I have also upgraded to 2.01 and restored a few times without impact.

Hi,
I got somewhat similar problem with special charecters(German umlaud �,�,�..).
I create a file with java having special charecters in it. Now if I open this file I am able to view the special charecters in it.But If I attach this file send it using following code then receiver can not see the umlaud charecters in it.They get replaced by _ or ?
MimeBodyPart mbp2 = new MimeBodyPart();
FileDataSource fds = new FileDataSource(fileName);
mbp2.setDataHandler(new DataHandler(fds));
mbp2.setFileName(output.getName());
Multipart mp = new MimeMultipart();
mp.addBodyPart(mbp2);
msg.setContent(mp);
Transport.send(msg);
From you message it looks like you are able to send the mail attachment correctly(by preserving special charecters).
Can you tell me what might be wrong in my code.
I appriciate your efforts in advance.
Prasad

OBIEE 11.1.1.7 compatibility setting is not supported

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for