One vendor shows multiple payment terms

Hi
The user has maintained payment terms in in MM (MK02) & FI (FK02) and maintained same payment term for Company code. However in BW report for "Purchase statistic per Supplier" does not match with R/3 and some vendor shows multi payment term.
What might be the reason for it/
Your valuable advise and suggestions are appreciated
TIA
P.B

Hi
Any ideas?

Similar Messages

Can a vendor have multiple Payment terms?

Hi
The user has maintained payment terms in MM (MK02) & FI (FK02) and maintained same payment term for Company code. However in BW report for "Purchase statistic per Supplier" does not match with R/3 and some vendor shows multi payment term.
What might be the reason for it?
Your valuable advise and suggestions are appreciated
TIA
Ishi

Hi
Any ideas?

Multiple payment terms in PO/MIRO

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where the business has multiple payment terms for different materials in the same PO/IR.
I tried using VSR but since the payment terms is at PO header it takes only one payment terms. Even if it does how can we handle this payment after invoice posting?
The invoice again has 2 material for same vendor with two different payment terms.
Regards,
Sid

I have a similar issue. PO set up for one large item, pay 30% upon order, so Due Upon Receipt and the balance owing is at NET 30, so 2 different sets of terms.
The vendor master carries the Terms over to the PO, however the PO terms can be changed and once changed these override the normal vendor master terms.
So on first PO for Product A - you specify terms as being Net 20
On 2nd PO for Product B - you can let the vendor terms come over Net 30
For you this will work as long as your vendor is able to split the invoices by product which they should do.
ON the MIRO side, for each invoice posted the terms can also be changed so if it was missed when doing the PO it can be corrected at IR. If your system is set for checking duplicate invoices and you have to put a combined product invoice into MIRO then you will have to alter the Reference field invoice number on the 2nd invoice. IE Inv#123-A & Inv#123-B etc. But you are best getting your vendor to invoice you by product.

Single invoice for multiple payment terms

Hi Friends,
I have given 2 different payment terms for 2 line items in single order and the billing is splitted due to this reason. I want to know where the system is checking this control. Because I want to create single Invoive even the payment terms are different. (The routine 003 under Data VBRK/VBRP in SO to Bill copy controls will be usefull only to create single Invoice for multiple SO's where the payment terms is same). But I need to create single Invoice even for multiple payment terms.
Can anyone suggest me at the earliest please.
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
The Billing Split is take care at Copy control level.
For multiple line items in one single SO, with different Payment terms is not acceptable as per the business logic and its not best practices.
Please suggest the business to go on Split method only.
Or
Try to use Proforma Invoice Concept.
Regards
Srini

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

How can we maintain multiple payment terms for a customer

how can we maintain multiple payment terms for a customer?

Hi,
You can leave the Payment terms field in the sales area data tab blank. and you can enter the payment terms at line item level while creating the sales order. By that you will achieve multiple payment terms for the same customer in the same sales order. but the invoice will be split by standard SAP based on the payment terms.
Also difference between the "Payment Terms" field in Company code tab and the sales Area tab is.
Company code tab payment terms are used only for the documents that are posted directly in FI module. for example credit and debit memos posted directly in FI and as a leading practice this should always be "payable Immidiately"
Sales area Tab payment terms are the one which are copied on to the sales order header data which are valid for all the line items unless you specifically mention different payment terms at line item level.
Regards,
Shantanu

Vendor changes tracking, Payment term filtering, Vendor listing

Hi All,
Need somebody help on the following points,
1- While changing the vendor via "process vendor and Bidder" (Business partner maintenance) transaction in EBP, the selection of payment term is restricted. That is in SPRO I can see lot of payment terms, but while changing the vendor some few payment terms are coming. Where is the filter? Can anybody guide me.
2- Vendor changes Tracking. In our project somebody has changed frequently the vendor indicators and details in EBP via process Vendor and Bidder(BP maintenance) transaction. But I couldnt able to track which fields are changed and by whom like in R/3. I tried in BP also, but only the address changed details are coming there. Can anybody guide me how to track the changes, if somebody changed somefield in EBP directly?
3- Vendor list - I want list ERS activated vendor in EBP. How to get the list of vendor for which ERS indicator is active? Please guide me.
Many thanks in Advance.
Regards
Shunmugaraj. T

Hi
Please refer to standard transaction - BBP_PD.. give any Shopping cart number, which is approved by a list of buyers, managers, etc..
Incase the changes are made, it will display all the details related to them in that case.
Understand its logic by putting break-point inside.
Incase you are using SRM 5.5 version, there is a report, which displays the changes made to the Purchase orders with old and new values.
Report name -> TERM_DISPLAY_CHANGE_HISTORY
Also please refer this as well.
Say you use this Function module for the change object - BUPA_BBP0060
This sample code will all the changes, if any, made to the object, with the old value and new values.
Here is the sample code for the FM ->
CHANGEDOCUMENTS_TO_OBJECT 
data: listtitle(80) type c.
data: objectclass like cdhdr-objectclas.
data: objecttitle(20) type c.
data: con_keylength(2) type n value 10.
data: cursor_field(20) type c.
listtitle = 'Changes made'.
listtitle+22 = vibebe-sberi.
listtitle+34 = vibebe-xberibz.
condense listtitle.
objectclass = 'BUPA_BBP0060'.
call function 'CHANGEDOCUMENTS_TO_OBJECT'
 exporting
 callmodus = callmodus
 cursor_field = cursor_field
 keylength = con_keylength
 listtitle = listtitle
 objectclass = objectclass
 objectid = objectid
 objecttitle = objecttitle
 exceptions
 error_in_function = 01
 invalid_field = 02
 others = 03.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
 message id sy-msgid type 'S' number sy-msgno
 with sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
endif.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

Vendor Invoice verification payment terms

Hi Experts,
PO is having one item with Gross price,freight .
Freight vendor is different from main vendor.
Main vendor-PAYMENT TERMS-1% discount- 5 days
Freight vendor--PAYMENT TERMS- pay immidiatly
After making GRN and when i tried to post invoice in MIRO
for freight vendor,system is not calculating as per payment terms of freight vendor and showing 1%discount as in main vendor payment terms
Let me know how system can calculate freight value with out discount .
I tried simuating invoice with PO reference,Vendor reference also in MIRO.
Thanks ,
Rama

Hi
Payment terms are defined in the PO at header level and hence the system takes the payment terms of the regular vendor for the freight vendor also.
Check whether payment terms can be given at item level.
If not possible then change the payment terms for the freight vendor manually while doing MIRO .
while doing MIRO select PO reference and also planned delivery costs selection.
Revert with ur comments..
Reg
Raja

Flexible Multiple Payment Terms

Hi SAP Gurus,
Is there any option to include multiple flexible payment terms in a PO?
By flexible, I mean, users shall have the to write in fields either the % or the value and the desctiption of payment terms, instead of selecting Z102, Z103, etc. which are already available (by creating and assigning installment payments in FI in advance). And later to appear in PO printout, unlike Discounts on net, Packaging, etc. in Condition Types where either the % or the value can be entered by users and where those Condition Types either substract or add to the PO value. But in this situation, neither the % nor the value nor the description of payment terms remain same for the same or other vendor.
For example, Z102-' 20% against drawing approval ' in a PO may not remain same for the same or other vendor in another PO and it may be '10% against submission of drawings'. Similarly Z103-'20% against shipping documents', etc.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,

I have a similar issue. PO set up for one large item, pay 30% upon order, so Due Upon Receipt and the balance owing is at NET 30, so 2 different sets of terms.
The vendor master carries the Terms over to the PO, however the PO terms can be changed and once changed these override the normal vendor master terms.
So on first PO for Product A - you specify terms as being Net 20
On 2nd PO for Product B - you can let the vendor terms come over Net 30
For you this will work as long as your vendor is able to split the invoices by product which they should do.
ON the MIRO side, for each invoice posted the terms can also be changed so if it was missed when doing the PO it can be corrected at IR. If your system is set for checking duplicate invoices and you have to put a combined product invoice into MIRO then you will have to alter the Reference field invoice number on the 2nd invoice. IE Inv#123-A & Inv#123-B etc. But you are best getting your vendor to invoice you by product.

Multiple payment terms for receivables

Hello dear SAP experts,
I need anysorta solution for my payment term setting problems (erp 4.6 / 6.0). For one of our area need set up this payment terms:
due date - 60 days, terms are 6% discount in case of payment in 10 days, 5% discount in 20 days, 5% disc. in 30 days, 4% disc. in 40 days... and so on (6 terms).
How can i solve this problem? I know so i can divide payments by days limits for "before 15th" and "after 15th" of given-month what means 4 terms... but i had never worked with it. I mean i set payment terms but they weren't multiple types...
Thank you in advance!
Tomi

Hi
Thank you very much!
Its not too good news for me... are you sure?
BR
Tomi

Multiple payment term with different day limit

We have three payment terms with multiple day limit. for example: ED11 (day limit 10), ED11 (25 day limit) and ED11 (32 days).
User enter just ED11 but i dont understand how system understand which out of the three is the require payment term.
Users feel that due date calculated is wrong. In most case it calculate the due date exactly based on the days mentioned in the payment term. In all cases, days mentioned are 90 days.
In one case, due date if it is (just 90 days) 30/04 but user feels it should be 10th May in the following (obviously he is reffering to ED11 daylimit 10). In this case, SAP calculate 90 days. Is it because of too many payment terms which same name.
Best,
Bala

Hi,
Please go and check the following path.If teh user wants no. of days as 10, then it should be maintained as 10 in the no. of days field in Payment terms. I think in your case it may be maintained as 90.
IMG->Finacial Accounting->General Ledger Accounting->Accounts Receivable and accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Invoices/Credit memos->Maintain Terms of Payment->Check No. of days in Payment terms.
Assign points if u consider this to be useful.
Thanks,
Prithwiraj

One Vendor Code - Multiple Addresses

Hi Experts ,
We have One Vendor But he has two different Plants and we need to create PO with Ref. to Both the Plants. Do we need to create Two Separate Vendor codes in SAP with Different Addresses or we can utilize same Vendor Code for both Addresses.
SAP Version we are Using : SAP R/3 ECC 6.0
Kindly Guide.
Regards
Honey

it is possible to assign only one vendor to a supplying plant. If you have multiple supplying plants then you can
create multiple vendors and assign each of them to a plant. You do not need to reorganize your purchasing organization for this. Once you make the plant assignment to the vendor you can then use this vendor for raising the stock transport order for this plant. Treat this vendor similar to any other vendor for the receiving plant.
Plants that are involved in company-internal business transactions can be described in terms of a business partner (such as a vendor or customer). Such a company-internal transaction might involve a stock transport order followed by a delivery and possibly an invoice, for example. What is important to bear in mind is that the business partner
you assign to the plant for this purpose is a theoretical business partner which describes the plant and not an actual external business partner with which your company has business relations.

One Vendor With Multiple address

Hi,
We have a scenario, we have one vendor which has multiple adresss. Means one address for correspondence (PO, reminder etc) another address for sending payment etc.
How to map in sap.
Regards
Ishu

>
ishu 2002 wrote:
> Thanks all of you for the answer, but my problem is that We don't want to open new vendor for partner function. We want to use the same vendor code for both the addresses.
> Regards
> Ishu
SAPs design solution is to use partner functions.
There is no other solution in SAP that could make your wish become true.

Mass change of Vendor Line Items Payment Terms

Hi all
We are trying to make a mass change of payment terms for vendor line items. We have implemented the change required as per SAP note 640908. However when we try to do this not all payment terms are changed.
The log gives us the following error - 'Field BSEG-ZTERM. does not exist in the screen SAPMF05L 1302'.
Please how can we solve this error.
Many thanks
PRG

Hi,
According to note 640908:
" Notes on error handling:
    If the mass change does not occur as required even though you
    changed and activated all program parts, note that the error log
    for the mass change (Environment -> Mass change -> Error log of
    line item list) may contain useful information for error
    handling."
" Note: SAP cannot guarantee that the modified mass change will work
correctly even if you carry out all of the steps as described in the
manual tasks."
It is not planned to enter the payment terms by using of
the field payment term ZTERM but by using of the fields ZBD1T/ZBD1P and
ZBD2T/ZBD2P and ZBD3T.
With Best Regards,
Gladys Xing

Unable to Create PO for a Vendor with Particular payment terms

Hi All,
we have a scenarion in SRM 7.0 system where the PO is ending up in error in SRM for a vendor. In BBP_PD the error message says "Enter payt terms" " enter GR Non Valuated".
Now in my SRM system i can see the PO has got the payment terms and PO is for single account assignment. i have generated the BAPI data for the BAPI_PO_CREATE1 and can confirm the erro is coming form backend and in the bapi the paymnet terms is correctly passed in the header record.
I am not sure why this error from backend.. have anyone encountered similar issue.
anything to check with paymet terms in backed. i have another payment terms working and few of them are not working.
cheers
Iftekhar Alam.

Note 1350184 - Payment terms from PO not transferred to backend
BBP_PDHGP-PMNTTRMS
Check payment term is available
Have you creted this payterm from SRM or pulled from ECC ?
Note 1350185 - Payment terms from PO not transferred to backend
check each data in BBP_PAYTERM in the value and match with ecc payterm table. some times some conditions are misinterupted in SRM
for ex.
Muthu

One vendor shows multiple payment terms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for