Problem with MIRO Transaction while posting Un planned Delivery cost

Hi all,
We have entered all the details including unplanned delivery cost in transaction MIRO. When we are trying to post the same by using post button directly with out simulation, system is asking for plant details.
For first time we have entered wrong Plant details , system immediately asking again for plant details.
Next time even if we entered correct plant details, the system is coming out from the screen MIRO and it is not posting the document.
If you go through simulate button and it is working fine and it is giving Warning message, If we enter the wrong Plant details.
My Client requirement is If we post the MIRO transaction including Un planned delivery cost with Post button. If we enter wrong plant details. System will through Error message, until we enter the correct plant details.
Is there any way to do this. Pl help me in this regard.
Regards,
Ramesh

In the MIRO T Code, U can see PO reference tab is there, Just below it there is Purchase order/scheduling agreement field is there . enter the purchase order number in blank field next to Purchase order/scheduling agreement and press enter. U can see it will  take the required data automatically.
hope this helps
regards

Similar Messages

  • Problem with MIGO Transaction, while posting PO with quantities 0

    When I try to post a PO using MIGO, with one or more quantites 0, the output type is not appearing in VL03N. An output type "OPOD( Proof of Delivery)" will appear if all the quantities of the posted PO is greater than 0 !!
       How can I resolve this ? Points will be rewarded for useful answers.

    Hi Naveen,
       Thank you very much for the suggestion. I'm not much familiar with the MM module. Could you please give me some clue on where to find the check box ?

  • How to change posting of Planned Delivery cost in Po?

    i need to change posting of planned delivery cost in PO to other expense account.
    as when i enter any planed delivery cost in PO it direct posted to the inventory account but i need to change it to be posted to other account.

    Hi Dear,
                 You need to maintain the Account Key for the condition type in the Pricing Procedure.
    and then for the same key maintain the GL account in the OBYC settings.
    Hope it helps you.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

  • I have problem with cn22 transaction while uploading

    dear Experts
    i  have problem while uploading the data into the CN22 transaction
    i t is updating frontend  mode 'A' but not updating with backend  when  'N'
    please tell me the solution.
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCOKO' '2000'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                                  'CAUFVD-AUFNR'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                  '=LIST'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'CAUFVD-AUFNR'
                                  wa_data-aufnr.
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCOVG' '2000'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                  '=EINF'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                                  'AFVGD-VORNR(01)'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'RC27X-FLG_SEL(01)'
                                   FLG_SEL_01_002.
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCOVG' '2000'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                  '/00'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                                  'AFVGD-ARBPL(01)'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'AFVGD-VORNR(01)'
                                   wa_data-vornr.
    perform bdc_field       using 'AFVGD-LTXA1(01)'
                                  wa_data-ltxa1.
    perform bdc_field       using 'AFVGD-DAUNO(01)'
                                  wa_data-dauno.
    perform bdc_field       using 'AFVGD-ARBPL(01)'
                                  wa_data-arbpl.
    perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCOVG' '2000'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                                  'VSNETEXT-NPLNR'.
    perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                                  '=BU'.
    *perform bdc_transaction using 'CN22'.
    call transaction 'CN22' using it_bdcdata
    OPTIONS FROM wa_CTU_PARAMS
    messages into mess_tab.

    Hi,
    First check the messages in intenal table mess_tab in debugging mode with mode N.
    Recording looks ok.
    Regards
    Praveen

  • Issue with reversal of MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost

    Hi Xperts
    We have found out an issue while reversing the MIRO document for Planned Del costs. When we have done the MIRO, the accounting entry got correctly posted with correct account keys.Conditions are not inventoried.
    However, when we had reversed it - the stock account got hit.Do not understand, why that happened.Do you have any clue?
    1. Suppose we have done the MIRO for Del Cost & then performed GR.Now Stock has already consumed & afterwards we have found that the MIRO for Del Cost is wrong & reverse - in this scenario shall the Stock account will get a hit????
    2. I have maintained Price Control "V" in Material Master.However, I have maintained a Standard Price by mistake.In that case shall SAP ignores the MAP & takes Standard Price into account & post PRD??
    Regards
    Soumick 

    Hi,
    Before checking Planned Delivery costs accounting documents in MIRO posting and MIRO cancellation document, 1st check how Planned Delivery costs designed for your procurement process.
    Use t.code:ME23N, check your Purchase order
    Option-1:
    Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account and at the same time Planned Delivery costs posted to Separate Planned Delivery costs G/L account.
    OR
    Option-2:
    Is Planned Delivery costs posted to Planned Delivery costs G/L account ONLY
    OR
    Option-3:
    Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account ONLY.
    Based the above one setting, system  will post goods receipt and invoice posting document with corresponding accounting entries. Also cancellation of invoice posting document refer to these setting.But account posting depends on price control available in material master.
    NOTE:
    Standard price procedure (price control “S”):The system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances in price are posted to price difference accounts.
    Moving average price (price control “V”): The system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.Differences in price between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Not to Post Planned Delivery Cost in IV before MIGO

    Dear Experts,
    We are maintaining the Delivery cost Condition values for different vendors in Purchase Order and we are selecting the GR Based IV check box. At the time of MIRO before making MIGO (Goods receipt) it will not allow to Post Incoming Invoice if I select Goods/Service items or both Goods/Service items & Planned Delivery Cost but it will allow if we select only Planned Delivery Cost to Post.
    Kindly suggest us if anybody have the solution to restrict to Post the Planned Delivery cost before posting the Goods Receipt (MIGO).
    Thanks & regards,
    Dhanu

    Dear,
    First u do the MIGO, After that post the Material IV with goods/service, after that u again do IV for planned delivery cost selection of Planned delivery cost.
    Thanks,
    If this is helpful for u then reward me.

  • How to know miro is planned delivery cost

    hi,
    any where to check eg table or report, can tell the miro posted document is for planned delivery cost.
    i think most of us notice that if display miro posted document, the indicator not there. only during edit or create, indicator is there.
    indicator means the goods/service item, planned delivery cost or both.
    now i need to check miro posted for planned delivery cost. if ask me to check PO in miro line item, i think that would be very difficult to track.
    please help.
    thanks

    Hi Dear,
                 You need to maintain the Account Key for the condition type in the Pricing Procedure.
    and then for the same key maintain the GL account in the OBYC settings.
    Hope it helps you.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

  • Condition category B,F and planned delivery cost indicator in MIRO

    hi,
    i would like to clarify the linking between condtion category and planned delivery cost indicator in MIRO.
    1) if in PO, i have condition type where category is B(delivery cost) or F(freight), then during GR, system will credit freight/customs clearing account. subsequently in MIRO, i have to choose planned delivery cost indicator when create invoice, correct?
    2) if my PO has no condition type where category is B or F, i do not have to choose planned delivery cost indicator during MIRO as no freight/customs clearing account to be set off. correct?
    thanks

    Hi Eliana,
    I think you are on right track.

  • Planned delivery cost in Import of Assets Materail

    Hi,
    I have a scenario, where we are purchasing (Import) Assets material from abroad. for this we have created Import PO with account assignment A. assigned the planned delivery cost in Condition Viz. Sea freight, Custom Duty, CHA charges and individual vendor also assigned at condition level.
    We have posted the MIRO for Custome Duty and Done the GR. Excise Invoice also Captured and posted. While posting the invoice of other Delivery cost after GR system is not showing any value in MIRO line item.
    Where as in normal inport cycle Value in Planned delivery cost IV (after GR) is appearing itself.
    Please guide how to Post Delievry cost IV in above scenario. we donot want to enter any amount manual in MIRO line item.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ranjan Kumar

    Hi Ranjan,
    The idea with MIRO is to enter the vendor invoice that you got on paper, i.e. the gross amount, the tax amount(s) and the net item amounts - all from the vendor invoice. For this reason the defaulted amounts shouldn't be necessary.
    If your business case is different, then there's a workaround. MIRO only suggests amounts if two cases:
    - PO doesn't have provision for GR ("GR" flag on the tab "Delivery") or
    - PO does have provision for GR and the received qty up to day is higher than the total invoiced qty up to day.
    I have however used a user exit to make MIRO think the GR flag in the PO is not set. The user exit is the enhancement point MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE_01 of the enh. spot ES_SAPLMRMC located right in the beginning  of the function MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE. The function module receives the GR flag from the PO in the parameter I_MRM_PROP-WEPOS. Let your enhancement reset the flag and make MIRO believe the GR flag in the PO is not set. Then it will propose the PO qty and amount.
    However, let me underline again - the idea with MIRO is that you should type in the invoice that you hold your hand.
    BR
    Raf

  • Delivery note wise planned delivery cost

    Hi Experts,
    Please let us know in MIRO we want to pass planned delivery cost bills delivery note wise.
    But while we choosing delivery note option the option to choose planned delivery cost is vanishing.
    Our main motto to get the planned delivery cost grn wise in MIRO, please suggest how that can be achieved.
    Regards

    hi thanks for reply I have found the solution that delivery note only take cares the value part of the material
    I have to use bill of lading to get the delivery cost at IR
    Is there any way or copy control that whatever is being entered in delivery note at MIGO should be copied to the bill of lading field, with a flexibility user can change if he wants
    rgds

  • Tax code error while posting Planned delivery costs in Import Scenario

    Hi!!!!!
    I am getting on error while posting Planned delivery costs in MIRO for Import Purchase Order with zero value tax code v0. The error is
    "Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZAXINN"
    For Import I defined a pricing procedure which contains all condition types for CVD, Ecess, SEcess, Additional Customs Duty and Others.
    While making Import PO im putting V0 tax code. I assigned the Tax Codes to the Company code.
    Please let me know what config is missing.
    Regards,
    Durga

    Is you ZAXINN assigned to the country India
    and is your taxcode (created in FTXP) created for country India?
    kr
    hakan

  • Planned delivery cost posting in MIRO through IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM

    Hi Experts
    I came to know from the OSS Note 119092 that the planned delivery costs can not be posted for logistics(MM) incoming invoice throgh inbounf Function Module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM.
    I just want to know whether this problem is rectified in ECC 6.0 or still this problem exists?
    Awaiting for your earliest response.
    Regards
    Mohamed

    Hi,
    There is a modification note that is released.
    1386272 EDI: Planned delivery costs..
    If you require this functionality please raise a message with SAP..
    Since this is a Pilot note release for few customers.
    regards,
    Lalita

  • I have a problem with the transaction CBIH82

    Hi experts,
    I have a problem with the transaction CBIH82, when I try to assign a team in the tab "EventLocation", the transaction sends me the message "Equipment not available at the functional location".
    I previously reviewed the equipment is assigned to the transaction IL03.
    No authorization errors, I checked with the transaction SU53.
    Any idea to solve this problem?
    I appreciate it.

    Hello,
    I happened to again see this post where question is yet to be answered.
    As per SAP standard design, only those equipment would be allowed which are directly installed on the functional location. What this means is that those equipment which are not directly assigned to the functional location (might be assigned to another superior equipment which in turn is assigned to the functional location) can't be saved.
    Now, I am not sure why SAP has kept it like this when the same is allowed in notification.
    Can somebody clarify the business relevance of this standard behavior??
    Regards,
    Pavan

  • Problem with Progress DB while using to connect using JDBC Adapter

    Hi,
      I am facing Problem with Progress DB while using to connect using JDBC Adapter. I am getting the following error in auditlog file like,
    Error during database connection to the database URL  jdbc:JdbcProgress:T:156.5.31.65:2545:/mfgprodev/devbadb 
    /devsche/i_apoext.db using the  JDBC driver "com.progress.sql.jdbc.JdbcProgressDriver" : com.sap.aii.adapter.jdbc.sql.DriverManagerException: Unable to locate a suitable JDBC driver to establish a connection to URL " jdbc:JdbcProgress:T:156.5.31.65:2545:/mfgprodev/devbadb 
    /devsche/i_apoext.db "
    I tried using the following all URLs,
    1. jdbc:JdbcProgress:T:156.5.31.65:2545:i_apoext.       
    2. jdbc:JdbcProgress:T:156.5.31.65:2545:i_apoext.db     
    3.                                                      
    jdbc:JdbcProgress:T:156.5.31.65:2545:/mfgprodev/devbadb 
    /devsche/i_apoext.                                      
    4.                                                      
    jdbc:JdbcProgress:T:156.5.31.65:2545:/mfgprodev/devbadb 
    /devsche/i_apoext.db.                                  
    Can anyone please help me out in solving this issue.
    May be the cause for this is :
    1) The Wrong URL  format
    2) CLASSPATH is not setted properly..
    Can you look more into this stuff.
    Thanks,
    Soorya.

    Hi,
    To access any database fromm XI, using the JDBC adapter, the corresponding drivers have to be installed on the XI server.
    Just check this note 831162.
    Also, check this PDF to install Drivers in XI,
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3867a582-0401-0010-6cbf-9644e49f1a10

  • Problem with two monitors while using Photoshop, windows move from 2nd screen to 1st screen.

    Problem with two monitors while using Photoshop, windows move from 2nd screen to 1st screen.
    I saved a new workspace and it did not help.
    No problem before I went to Maverick.

    I found the fix, go to System Preferences and open Mission Control and uncheck the box to keep monitors as they were (When switching to an application...........)

Maybe you are looking for