Problems with 2 fact tables

Hi.
I use cmw2_ procedures to create dimensions and cubes.
My cube has three dimensions.
I have 2 fact views - one includes 3 dimensions,
another - 2 dimensions.
I tried to map measures to these fact tables - error: exact fetch return more than requested number of rows.
How can i solve these problem?
Sorry for my english.

A time dimension (or date dimension for that matter) are quite independent and you can find N good generic time/date dim structures out there (with proper Y/M/DAGO keys, calendar vs fiscal rollups etc etc).
But if you only want to create a single common time/date dim based on what you have in your facts, you can just follow (as a quick win before thinking about how to structure a physical time/date dim) Stewarts basic example here:
http://www.rittmanmead.com/2012/12/obiee-transactional4/
"Building a Date Dimension" a bit further down the page.

Similar Messages

Calc problem with fact table measure used as part of bridge table model

Hi all,
I'm experiencing problems with the calculation of a fact table measure ever since I've used it as part of a calculation in a bridge table relationship.
In a fact table, PROJECT_FACT, I had a column (PROJECT_COST) whose default aggregate was SUM. Whenever PROJECT_COST was used with any dimension, the proper aggregation was done at the proper levels. But, not any longer. One of the relationships PROJECT_FACT has is with a dimension, called PROJECT.
PROJECT_FACT contains details of employees and each day they worked on a PROJECT_ID. So for a particular day, employee, Joe, might have a PROJECT_COST of $80 for PROJECT_ID 123, on the next day, Joe might have $40 in PROJECT_COST for the same project.
Dimension table, PROJECT, contains details of the project.
A new feature was added to the software - multiple customers can now be charged for a PROJECT, where as before, only one customer was charged.
This percentage charge break-down is in a new table - PROJECT_BRIDGE. PROJECT_BRIDGE has the PROJECT_ID, CUSTOMER_ID, BILL_PCT. BILL_PCT will always add up to 1.
So, the bridge table might look like...
PROJECT_ID CUSTOMER_ID BILL_PCT
123          100     .20
123          200     .30
123          300     .50
456 400 1.00
678 400 1.00
Where for project 123, is a breakdown for multiple customers (.20, .30. .50).
Let's say in PROJECT_FACT, if you were to sum up all PROJECT_COST for PROJECT_ID = 123, you get $1000.
Here are the steps I followed:
- In the Physical layer, PROJECT_FACT has a 1:M with PROJECT_BRIDGE as does PROJECT to PROJECT_BRIDGE (a 1:M).
PROJECT_FACT ===> PROJECT_BRIDGE <=== PROJECT
- In the Logical layer, PROJECT has a 1:M with PROJECT_FACT.
PROJECT ===> PROJECT_FACT
- The fact logical table source is mapped to the bridge table, PROJECT_BRIDGE, so now it has multiple tables it maps to (PROJECT_FACT & PROJECT_BRIDGE). They are set for an INNER join.
- I created a calculation measure, MULT_CUST_COST, using physical columns, that calculates the sum of the PROJECT_COST X the percentage amount in the bridge table. It looks like: SUM(PROJECT_FACT.PROJECT_COST * PROJECT_BRIDGE.BILL_PCT)
- I brought MULT_CUST_COST into the Presentation layer.
We still want the old PROJECT_COST around until it get's phased out, so it's in the Presentation layer as well.
Let's say I had a request with only PROJECT_ID, MULT_CUST_COST (the new calculation), and PROJECT_COST (the original). I'd expect:
PROJECT_ID MULT_CUST_COST PROJECT_COST
123          $1000     $1000
I am getting this for MULT_CUST_COST, however, for PROJECT_COST, it's tripling the value (possibly because there are 3 percent amounts?)...
PROJECT_ID MULT_CUST_COST PROJECT_COST
123          $1000 (correct)      $3000 (incorrect, it's been tripled)
If I were to look at the SQL, it would have:
          SELECT SUM(PROJECT_COST),
SUM(PROJECT_FACT.PROJECT_COST * PROJECT_BRIDGE.BILL_PCT),
               PROJECT_ID
          FROM ...
          GROUP BY PROJECT_ID
PROJECT_COST used to work correctly before modeling a bridge table.
Any ideas on what I did wrong?
Thanks!

Hi
Phew, what a long question!
If I understand correctly I think the problem lies with your old cost measure, or rather combining that with you new one in the same request. If you think about it, your query as explained above will bring back 3 rows from the database which is why your old cost measure is being multiplied. I suspect that if you took it out of the query, your bridge table would be working properly for the new measure alone?
I would consider migrating your historic data into the bridge table model so that you have a single type of query. For the historic data each would have a single row in the bridge with a 1.0 BILL_PCT.
Best of luck,
Paul
http://total-bi.com

Problems with Fact Table in an Infocube

In IC 0CCA_C11 we've seen almost a 50% increase in the row count on the F fact table from about 100 million rows to about 150 million rows. However we are very certain that we really havent had that much growth.
We have a process chain that does a full load of 12 million rows to the cube and then deletes the previous full load. Because this PC is conflicting with a more important PC that loads to the cube, we've been cancelling the step in the PC and manually deleting the previous request out of the cube via the IC "Manage" screen.
Is it possible that what we've been doing has been leaving rows in the cube that we thought were deleted?
If so, is there an Analysis and Repair function in RSRV that will get rid of all these extra rows?
There's no way this cube could have truly grown by 50 million rows in 2 weeks!

Wardell,
Check the data in RSA3 for the extractor that you use to bring data .
You must be using the data source 0CO_OM_CCA_09. Check the data and reconcile and you will get it.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks
Ravi Thothadri
[email protected]

Problems with partition tables

Hi all,
I've got some problems with partition tables. The script at the bottom run but when I wanna insert some values it returns me an error
(ORA-06550: line 1, column 30: PL/SQL: ORA-06552: PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
ORA-06553: PLS-320: the declaration of the type of this expression is incomplete or malformed
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored)
and I can't understand why!
There's something incorrect in the script or not?
Please help me
Thanks in advance
Steve
CREATE TABLE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED
ID_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED VARCHAR2 (27) NOT NULL ,
START_VALIDITY_DATE DATE NOT NULL ,
END_VALIDITY_DATE DATE ,
CUSTOMER_STATUS VARCHAR2 (255)
PARTITION BY RANGE (START_VALIDITY_DATE)
SUBPARTITION BY LIST (END_VALIDITY_DATE)
PARTITION M200909 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091001','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200909_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200909_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200910 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091101','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200910_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200910_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200911 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20091201','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200911_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200911_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M200912 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100101','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M200912_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M200912_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M201001 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100201','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M201001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M201002 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('20100301','YYYYMMDD'))
(SUBPARTITION M201002_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M201002_NN VALUES (DEFAULT)),
PARTITION M210001 VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE))
(SUBPARTITION M210001_N VALUES (NULL), SUBPARTITION M210001_NN VALUES (DEFAULT))
;

Hi Hoek,
the DB version is 10.2 (italian version, then SET is correct).
...there's something strange: now I can INSERT rows but I can't update them!
I'm using this command string:
UPDATE TW_E_CUSTOMER_UNIFIED SET END_VALIDITY_DATE = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR') WHERE
id_customer_unified = '123' and start_validity_date = TO_DATE('09-SET-09', 'DD-MON-RR');
And this is the error:
Error SQL: ORA-14402: updating partition key column would cause a partition change
14402. 00000 - "updating partition key column would cause a partition change"
*Cause: An UPDATE statement attempted to change the value of a partition
key column causing migration of the row to another partition
*Action: Do not attempt to update a partition key column or make sure that
the new partition key is within the range containing the old
partition key.
I think that is impossible to use a PARTITION/SUBPARTITION like that: in fact the update of "END_VALIDITY_DATE" cause a partition change.
Do u agree or it's possible an update on a field that implies a partition change?
Regards Steve

Problems with a table in PDF`S footer

Dear sirs,
We are having problems when trying to run a PDF with Adobe LiveCycle Designer tool.
We are working with a PDF which is composed of a header, the main body and a footer. We have created a table (table1) at the footer and
another one at the main body (table2). This last table (table2) may overflow therefore it will genarate two pages for our PDF.
On both pages appear the header and the footer correctly but in the last page it does not write the data from the table included in the footer (table1).
We have no problems with the table included in the main body
In the attachments, I send you the screenshots of both pages in which I have marked in red the part where we have error.
May you help us to solve our problem?
Thanks in advance your help.
Edited by: emgaitan on Mar 16, 2010 2:18 PM

Wardell,
Check the data in RSA3 for the extractor that you use to bring data .
You must be using the data source 0CO_OM_CCA_09. Check the data and reconcile and you will get it.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks
Ravi Thothadri
[email protected]

I am getting problem with internal table & work area declaration.

I am working with 'makt' table ..with the table makt i need to work with styles attributes ..so i declared like this
TYPES : BEGIN OF ty_makt,
         matnr TYPE makt-matnr,
         spras TYPE makt-spras,
         maktx TYPE makt-maktx,
         maktg TYPE makt-maktg,
         celltab TYPE lvc_t_styl,
       END OF ty_makt.
DATA : i_makt TYPE TABLE OF ty_makt.
DATA : wa_makt TYPE ty_makt .
    But end of program i need to update dbtable "makt"...i am getting problem with internal table & work area declaration.
i think makt table fields mapping and internal table/work area mapping is not correct. so please help me to get out from this.

Hi Nagasankar,
TYPES : BEGIN OF TY_MATNR,
              MATNR TYPE MAKT-MATNR,
              SPRAS TYPE MAKT-SPRAS,
              MAKTX TYPE MAKT-MAKTX,
              MAKTX TYPE MAKT-MAKTG,
              CELLTAB TYPE LVC_T_STYL, " Its Working perfectly fine..
             END OF TY_MAKT.
DATA: IT_MAKT TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF TY_MAKT,
          WA_MAKT TYPE TY_MAKT.
Its working perfectly fine. if still you are facing any issue post your complete code.
Thanks,
Sandeep

Problem with a table control

Hi gurus,
I´ve a problem with a table control. It has 3 columns which one is a checkbox.
I can fill all fields but in the moment I mark the checkbox this line must be unwritable. How can I do it?
Thanks for all
Dani

Assign a function code to the checkbox column....
so when u check / uncheck any entry, PAI + PBO will be triggered....
In the PBO during the loop of table control, check the checkbox field value. if it is 'X', make the row readonly
by looping at screen and setting screen-input = 0 for rest of the columns.
like ...
LOOP AT tc_itab
       WITH CONTROL tc_test
       CURSOR tc_test-current_line.
   module set_row_readonly. " loop at screen and set input = '0' if checkbox is checked...
ENDLOOP.

Problem with maintain table views SM30 Transaction

Hello All,
i have a problem with the table maintenance view SM30, it doesn't permit me to modify the rows in the table.
we have added a field into the table and when i tried to change the table view from menu: Utilities ==> table maintenance generator==> change the system propose me a message that the screen 0001 will be deleted and recreated...but the system has deleted the screen and doesn't recreate it...in somewehere on internet we find that we should use the transaction SE55 menu:
Environment==> modification ==> Maintenance screen ==> button Layout which open the tool Screen Painter and from that we have created our screen with 4 fields of our table...our result that the screen is created and i can see it from the SM30 transaction but i can't insert rows in the table...when i try to go to maintain table: menu: Utilities ==> Table maintenance generator to try if i can modify something the system give me a message: "set the compare flag dialog ZIV_DP_PLCHAR_LA"
the ZIV_DP_PLCHAR_LA is the name of my table...
can you give me some advices please how should i do to fix this problem to insert rows in table throughout the transaction
SM30 "maintain table views: initial screen"
if i want to delete the screen from the SE55 transaction to recreate it newly what should i do to take care about some options
to have a new screen?
thanks for all
Bilal

Hi
First delete the old table maintainence generator.
Now Recreate the screen and your table is good to go..
These error messages come when we add new fields and different version of the table maintainence generator in database.

Problem with Pivot Table with Graph: Line Bar Combo

Hello people!
I have a problem with pivot table and line bar combo (all in the same view (pivot table))
I have some measures and one dimension in my report.
--------------measure1---measure2---measure3
Dim A.1
Dim A.2
Dim A.3
If I choose my graph line bar combo automatically choose "line" measure 3 (last measure in "Show Controls"). How can I do if I want my measure1 for line and I don't want modify my pivot table?
Thank you very much!

Ok, I'll explain my problem again. In my pivot table I add graph vision and I want in the same view (Pivot table). My graph is "Line Bar Combo" and I don't know how but the last of my measures belongs to right AXIS, if I change order of my measures I can see in my graph the measure that I want in my right axis BUT also it changes the order of my pivot table.
This is my problem. I think that I can do that with different views but I lose my selector view to view graphic and my pivot table at the same time.

Problem with truncate table in procedure ora -00054

hi do anybody know where is mistake ???
the procedure has problem with truncate table
ora - 00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
ora - 06512 at "POVAPSYS.HMAN_P_REFRESH", line 6
ora - 06512 at "POVAPSYS.POVAPSYS", line 6
ora - 06512 at line 1
this is my procedure....
AS
BEGIN
execute immediate 'TRUNCATE TABLE hman_t_max';
INSERT INTO hman_t_max SELECT * FROM hman_v_max;
COMMIT;
END;

2.MAKE SURE THAT OTHER THAN YOU ANYBODY IS TRYING TO
COMPILE AND RUN THE PROCEDUREShould he make sure that anybody is running the procedure?
3.MAKE SURE THAT ANY PARALLEL QUERY IS RUNNING IN THE
SERVER SIDE,THATS KEEPS THE RESOURCE BUSYShould he make sure any parallel query is running in the server side to keep the resource busy?
Gita,
I COULDN'T RESIST HAVING ONE SUGGESTION FOR YOU. Please look at the impact of your English in the reply before posting. Check if that sends reverse message!
Cheers
Sarma.

Modelling Time Dimension with Fact Table containing Start Date and End Date

Hi Gurus,
I have a time dimension with Year till Date. I have a fact table which consists of Start Date, End Date, Person ID, Department ID.
How do i design Time dimension with fact table the below scenario
In the dashboard i have start Month and End month as prompts.
In the report i need to display Count(Person ID) > Start Date and < End Date along the trend.
For instance, i have selected Jan-2009 as start date and Apr-2009 as End Date, then i need to display Count(Person ID) of Jan-2009, Feb2009, Mar-2009 andApr-2009.
I Can not connect Time dimension with only Start Date or only with End Date to get the trend along the months.
Please advice on the issue which i am having.

Hi,
Thanks for the response, Infact i tried using Complex join in physical layer. I have considered Time table joined with Fact table, and used >= and took and alias of the Time table and joined fact table using <=. When coming to BMM, i am not knowing how do i design this as if i merge the both the time dimensiona and its alias into single table, values will not be correct and if i make them as seperate columns. i can not show the trend as both are different columns.
Can you please let know where i am going wrong.
Thanks

Problem with the table control BDC in FV60 transaction

Hi All,
I got the problem with the table control in FV60 transaction.
This is working for 900 line items.After 900 line items it is giving the problem like it is 1000th line item.You can post only 999 line items.
I know we can post only 999 line items,but in my file only 920 line items.
Please give me solution,if anybody come across this situation.
Thanks & regards,
rakesh.

Hello Rakesh ,
your file may have only 920 line items , but based on those line items, SAP may create few more new lines ( based on the clearing recon accounts , inter company transaction ...etc )...
regards
Prabhu

Problem with automatic table of contents Level headings

I am having trouble with the Table of contents in Adobe Indesign. When I create my automatic table of contents one of the Level headings that is supposed to appear under Chapter 1 instead appears under the Introduction heading. On the actual page where the heading paragraph styles have been defined the 2nd Level heading is as it should be underneath Chapter 1. So what I end up having to do is move them manually in the TOC. But I don’t want to have to do this and it would be great if Indesign instead did the automatic table of contents correctly.
I wonder if it has anything to with the fact that our template is set up with headings (that sit outside the body text to the left) as text boxes which we place inside the main body text box (they have anchored object settings on them so the heading sits off to the side). Whilst the anchored text box is exactly in the right sequence, maybe indesign senses and reads the anchored text box last?
I have an example of the file and the problem that is occurring in the pdf, it can be downloaded from:
Is there a solution to this? If anyone has any ideas I would be very grateful.

I've been playing with this for a while, and quite honestly I don't understand why it's doing things the way it is. It's working correctly on Page 11, which seems to me to have exactly the same structure, except for the subtitle. It also works correctly if I copy the frames from page 14 and paste into a new doc.
Things I tried that did not work: Export as .inx and move the pages to a new doc. You might try copying the text and pasting into a new doc.

OBIEE 10g: Problem on fact table mapping

Hi to everyone,
i have this situation:
1) i have 2 fact tables in phisical model (FHRCTR and HCTOT) this two table is the same in the FK columns.
2) the structure is: FHRCTR[month_fk, transaction_type, measure A], HCTOT[month_fk, measure B]. 'transaction_type' is an attribute of the table not dimension.
3) i have created a logical fact table with this two tables for source.
4) each field of logical table is mapped on the corrispetive field on the both phisical table, except for 'transaction_type' column having as source only FHRCTR table.
5) i've created a report with follow colums: month_fk, transaction_type, measure_A, measure_B
The problem is: if i create the report with the columns in point 5, the measure_B returns null values and the measure_A have a correct value.
Insteed if i create a report without 'transaction_type' column the value of Measure_B and Measure_A are correct.
I remind you that: 'transaction_type' in the logical fact table is mapped only on the FHRCTR table because on HCTOT it doesn't exist.
Can you help me to solve this issue?
Thanks

832596 wrote:
Can you help me to solve this issue?
ThanksI guess when you set some aggregation rule for 'transaction_type' in a repository then all will be ok (for examplу - min). But you'll get results that you don't expect.

Problems with QCM tables in DB export

Hi gurus, I have a problem with an export that I'm performing, the problem is that the R3SETUP is trying to export a QCM table "QCMT066" but this table doesn't exits in the database.
(EXP) ERROR: DbSlExeRead: rc = 107, table "QCMT066"
(SQL error 942)
error message returned by DbSl:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
The R3 system is a 4.6C and runs over HP-UX 11 64 bits and Oracle 8.1.7
I read and search SAP notes and inside the SAP forums, but I didn't find anything that could help me.
The transaction SM13 says that --> **** No update records found **** when I execute without client, user and date parameters.
The transaction SE11 says that the table in fact doesn't exits in the database, and if I execute a select sentence (SELECT TABLE_NAME FROM DBA_TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME LIKE 'QCM%') I can see that there is no table with this name.
In transaction.
The transaction SE14 > Extras> Invalid temp. table show the text " ... List is empty "
So please, Do you know what I could do to solve my problem?.
Thanks and best regards
Edited by: Juan Francisco Estrada Garcia on Sep 3, 2010 11:02 AM

Thank you, that is just what I did.
I found this [tread|r3load export error ORA-00942 for table QCMBTXBLOK; where the people talk about .TKS files, but the version that I'm trying to migrate is too old, and the R3LOAD doesn't use TKS files, so I edited every file(.EXT, .STR, .TOC) that contains references to QCM* tables. I deleted every line related with this kind of tables, and finally everything work and the export ended successfully.
Thanks

Problem with ADF Table and doDML method.

HI,
I have a problem with ADF Trinidad Table. I have one search form and which i click on search button the result is coming it's working fine, And when i click on CreateInsert button to insert a new row it's adding after entering all the data into the table when i click on button on the page i am getting error like
Messages for this page are listed below.
Error
Missing mandatory attributes for a row with key oracle.jbo.Key[1 ] of type AppModule.CmSubscribersView1
Error
Attribute Name in AppModule.CmSubscribersView1 is required
Error
Attribute CreatedBy in AppModule.CmSubscribersView1 is required
Error
Attribute CreationDate in AppModule.CmSubscribersView1 is required
Here Created By and Creation Date are not available in the table i need to set these data from back end for that i have used doDML() method in the entity object and i written the logic but this method not even invoking as i couldn't able to see the logs in the server.
protected void doDML(int operation, TransactionEvent e) {
super.doDML(operation, e);
System.out.println("^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^66666Inside entity object^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ");
// AppModuleImpl am=new AppModuleImpl();
// Number userID= am.getUserId();
//System.out.println("User id in the Entity Object Is: "+userID);
oracle.jbo.domain.Date dt = new Date();
if(operation ==DML_INSERT){
EntityDefImpl cmSubscribers=CmSubscribersImpl.getDefinitionObject();
CmSubscribersImpl newSubscribers=(CmSubscribersImpl)cmSubscribers.createInstance2(getDBTransaction(),null);
Number n=new Number(1599);
newSubscribers.setCreatedBy(n);
newSubscribers.setCreationDate(dt);
newSubscribers.setLastUpdateDate(dt);
newSubscribers.setLastUpdatedBy(n);
But still the same problem can any one help me inthis.
Regards,
Edited by: user5802014 on Aug 21, 2009 2:04 PM

Hi,
Modify your method to call super.doDML() after initialization of mandatory attributes as below:
protected void doDML(int operation, TransactionEvent e) {
     oracle.jbo.domain.Date dt = new Date();
     if(operation ==DML_INSERT){
          //PRE-INSERT code begins
       EntityDefImpl cmSubscribers=CmSubscribersImpl.getDefinitionObject();
       CmSubscribersImpl newSubscribers=(CmSubscribersImpl)cmSubscribers.createInstance2(getDBTransaction(),null);
       Number n=new Number(1599);
       newSubscribers.setCreatedBy(n);
       newSubscribers.setCreationDate(dt);
       newSubscribers.setLastUpdateDate(dt);
       newSubscribers.setLastUpdatedBy(n);
       //PRE-INSERT code ends
       super.doDML(operation, e);
       //POST-INSERT code if any
     }else
        super.doDML(operation, e);
}Sireesha

Problems with 2 fact tables

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for