Query with FULL OUTER JOIN , help pleaseeeeeeeeeeee...

Hi everyone,
I'm trying to write a query for a report in Oracle SQL, but i just can't figure out how to do it.
I'm using Oracle 10g release 1.0 database and i execute my queris in SQL* PLUS ( eventually i'm gonna use them in Oracle Report Builder ) .
here's what i have:
i have four tables that are used for our inventory application. lets call them INCOMMING , INCOMMING_ITEMS , OUTGOING , OUTGOING_ITEMS.
as you may have guessed , INCOMMING_ITEMS is the detail table for INCOMMING ( joined by IID column) and also OUTGOING_ITEMS is the detail table for OUTGOING ( joined by OID column ).
here is the structure of them :
INCOMMING
IID varchar2
CDATE date
INCOMMING_ITEM
IID varchar2
PART_NO number
QTY number
OUTGOING
OID varchar2
CDATE date
OUTGOING_ITEM
OID varchar2
PART_NO number
QTY number
now , the query i want, should return part_no , cdate , sum of OUTGOING qty , sum of INCOMMING qty .
the result of the query should be sth like this :
part_no     cdate     O_qty     I_qty
100     01/05/06     10     0
100     01/05/07     20     60
200     01/06/02     0     50
300     01/06/02     30     40
this means that for some dates and for some parts, i may not have INCOMMING or OUTGOING data, but if at least one of the 2 last columns has a non-zero data, i should show the row ( like the first and third rows of my example result), and if both have data for the same PART_NO and the same CDATE, both should be showed in the same row. ( like the second row in my example result)
i tried so much and came up with several huge and also time consuming queries, but then i read abt FULL OUTER JOIN somewhere and tried using that. here is what i came up with :
SELECT
PART_NO , CDATE , sum(II.QTY) I_QTY , SUM (OI.QTY) O_QTY
FROM
     (OUTGOING O INNER JOIN OUTGOING_ITEM OI USING ( OID ) )
FULL OUTER JOIN
     (INCOMMING I INNER JOIN INCOMMING_ITEM II USING ( IID ) )
ON ( I.CDATE = O.CDATE AND II.PART_NO = OI.PART_NO)
WHERE
I.CDATE = :PARAMETER1
AND O.CDATE = :PARAMETER1
GROUP BY
PART_NO , CDATE
this query is short and fast , but the results r not what i expected. i mean, although i have used FULL OUTER JOIN in the query , but the results i get r sth like this :
part_no     cdate     O_qty     I_qty
100     01/05/07     20     60
300     01/06/02     30     40
which means only the rows that has both values are returned.
any change i make to this query would make the SQL* PLUS hang , like when i use the cartesian product of two large tables, so i guess my changes wheren't in the right direction.
i think its possible to write this query using FULL OUTER JOIN syntax, but i just can't find it.
Can anybody pleaseeeeeeeeeeeee help me?
thanx in advance,
Maryam.

Note: I wrote this on the fly -- hope there is no syntax errors, otherwise forgive me -- but you get the idea..
select
fromUnionAll.cdate, fromUnionAll.part_no,
sum(fromUnionAll.O_qty) O_qty,
sum(fromUnionAll.I_qty) I_qty
from
select
iinner.cdate, iinner.part_no, 0 O_qty, iinner.I_qty
from
select
i.cdate, ii.part_no,
/* added the case only for the extreme case when there is
no record anywhere for the given CDATE in INCOMMING_item */
sum( ( case when ii.qty is not null then ii.qty else 0 end) ) I_qty
from
incomming i,
incomming_item ii
where
i.iid = ii.iid (+)
group by i.cdate, ii.part_no
) iinner
union all
select
oinner.cdate, oinner.part_no, oinner.O_qty, 0 I_qty
from
select
o.cdate, oi.part_no,
/* added the case only for the extreme case when there is
no record anywhere for the given CDATE in OUTGOING_item */
sum( ( case when oi.qty is not null then oi.qty else 0 end) ) O_qty
from
outgoing o,
outgoing_item oi
where
o.oid = oi.oid (+)
group by o.cdate, oi.part_no
) oinner
) fromUnionAll
group by fromUnionAll.cdate, fromUnionAll.part_no;
--Samson                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Similar Messages

  • Reg: Full outer join help pls

    hi friends,
    i have created the following query using full outer join
    pls help me.
    Thanks
    Rajesh
    Message was edited by:
    Rajesh.mani

    I'm not sure if there should be a AND before FULL OUTER JOIN clause. I've always been reluctant to use ANSI syntax. here you can check the actual syntax. Bu then, from now on, try to keep quote your query between [pre] and [/pre] tags to preserve the format.
    Cheers
    Sarma.

  • [8i] Need help with full outer join combined with a cross-join....

    I can't figure out how to combine a full outer join with another type of join ... is this possible?
    Here's some create table and insert statements for some basic sample data:
    CREATE TABLE     my_tab1
    (     record_id     NUMBER     NOT NULL     
    ,     workstation     VARCHAR2(4)
    ,     my_value     NUMBER
         CONSTRAINT my_tab1_pk PRIMARY KEY (record_id)
    INSERT INTO     my_tab1
    VALUES(1,'ABCD',10);
    INSERT INTO     my_tab1
    VALUES(2,'ABCD',15);
    INSERT INTO     my_tab1
    VALUES(3,'ABCD',5);
    INSERT INTO     my_tab1
    VALUES(4,'A123',5);
    INSERT INTO     my_tab1
    VALUES(5,'A123',10);
    INSERT INTO     my_tab1
    VALUES(6,'A123',20);
    INSERT INTO     my_tab1
    VALUES(7,'????',5);
    CREATE TABLE     my_tab2
    (     workstation     VARCHAR2(4)
    ,     wkstn_name     VARCHAR2(20)
         CONSTRAINT my_tab2_pk PRIMARY KEY (workstation)
    INSERT INTO     my_tab2
    VALUES('ABCD','WKSTN 1');
    INSERT INTO     my_tab2
    VALUES('A123','WKSTN 2');
    INSERT INTO     my_tab2
    VALUES('B456','WKSTN 3');
    CREATE TABLE     my_tab3
    (     my_nbr1     NUMBER
    ,     my_nbr2     NUMBER
    INSERT INTO     my_tab3
    VALUES(1,2);
    INSERT INTO     my_tab3
    VALUES(2,3);
    INSERT INTO     my_tab3
    VALUES(3,4);And, the results I want to get:
    workstation     sum(my_value)     wkstn_name     my_nbr1     my_nbr2
    ABCD          30          WKSTN 1          1     2
    ABCD          30          WKSTN 1          2     3
    ABCD          30          WKSTN 1          3     4
    A123          35          WKSTN 2          1     2
    A123          35          WKSTN 2          2     3
    A123          35          WKSTN 2          3     4
    B456          0          WKSTN 3          1     2
    B456          0          WKSTN 3          2     3
    B456          0          WKSTN 3          3     4
    ????          5          NULL          1     2
    ????          5          NULL          2     3
    ????          5          NULL          3     4I've tried a number of different things, googled my problem, and no luck yet...
    SELECT     t1.workstation
    ,     SUM(t1.my_value)
    ,     t2.wkstn_name
    ,     t3.my_nbr1
    ,     t3.my_nbr2
    FROM     my_tab1 t1
    ,     my_tab2 t2
    ,     my_tab3 t3
    ...So, what I want is a full outer join of t1 and t2 on workstation, and a cross-join of that with t3. I'm wondering if I can't find any examples of this online because it's not possible....
    Note: I'm stuck dealing with Oracle 8i
    Thanks!!

    Hi,
    The query I posted yesterday is a little more complicated than it needs to be.
    Since my_tab2.workstation is unique, there's no reason to do a separate sub-query like mt1; we can join my_tab1 to my_tab2 and get the SUM all in one sub-query.
    SELECT       foj.workstation
    ,       foj.sum_my_value
    ,       foj.wkstn_name
    ,       mt3.my_nbr1
    ,       mt3.my_nbr2
    FROM       (     -- Begin in-line view foj for full outer join
              SELECT        mt1.workstation
              ,        SUM (mt1.my_value)     AS sum_my_value
              ,        mt2.wkstn_name
              FROM        my_tab1   mt1
              ,        my_tab2   mt2
              WHERE        mt1.workstation     = mt2.workstation (+)
              GROUP BY   mt1.workstation
              ,        mt2.wkstn_name
                    UNION ALL
              SELECT      workstation
              ,      0      AS sum_my_value
              ,      wkstn_name
              FROM      my_tab2
              WHERE      workstation     NOT IN (     -- Begin NOT IN sub-query
                                               SELECT      workstation
                                       FROM      my_tab1
                                       WHERE      workstation     IS NOT NULL
                                     )     -- End NOT IN sub-query
           ) foj     -- End in-line view foj for full outer join
    ,       my_tab3  mt3
    ORDER BY  foj.wkstn_name
    ,       foj.workstation
    ,       mt3.my_nbr1
    ,       mt3.my_nbr2
    ;Thanks for posting the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, as well as the very clear desired results!
    user11033437 wrote:
    ... So, what I want is a full outer join of t1 and t2 on workstation, and a cross-join of that with t3. That it, exactly!
    The tricky part is how and when to get SUM (my_value). You might approach this by figuring out exactly what my_tab3 has to be cross-joined to; that is, exactly what should the result set of the full outer join between my_tab1 and my_tab2 look like. To do that, take your desired results, remove the columns that do not come from the full outer join, and remove the duplicate rows. You'll get:
    workstation     sum(my_value)     wkstn_name
    ABCD          30          WKSTN 1          
    A123          35          WKSTN 2          
    B456          0          WKSTN 3          
    ????          5          NULL          So the core of the problem is how to get these results from my_tab1 and my_tab2, which is done in sub-query foj above.
    I tried to use self-documenting names in my code. I hope you can understand it.
    I could spend hours explaining different parts of this query in more detail, but I'm sure I'd waste some of that time explaining things you already understand. If you want an explanation of somthing(s) specific, let me know.

  • Union among multiple select queries with full outer join

    Hello everyone,
    I have 3 different select queries (used FULL Outer Join) which work fine. Now I want to add Union to the results among them and pick the selected columns from each query in the final result. while doing so, I am getting an error as "right parenthesis missing". I am quite sure, it is not the real cause. I guess might be issue with the query structure.
    select j.pod, j.hostname, portal.hostname,saasc.hostname,a3s.hostname from -- * from
    Select J.Pod,J.Hostname, P.Pod Portal_Pod,P.Hostname Portal_Hostname
    From Total_Pod J
    full outer join Portal_Tmp P On (J.Pod = P.Pod And J.Hostname = P.Hostname) as portal
    Union
    Select J.Pod,J.Hostname, s.Pod saasc_Pod,s.Hostname saasc_Hostname
    From Total_Pod J
    full outer join Saasc_Tmp S  On (J.Pod = s.Pod And J.Hostname = s.Hostname) as saasc
    Union
    Select J.Pod,J.Hostname, a.Pod a3s_Pod,a.Hostname a3s_Hostname
    From Total_Pod J
    Full Outer Join A3s_Tmp A  On (J.Pod = A.Pod And J.Hostname = A.Hostname) as a3s
    )p.s: select * from (INNER QUERY); also does not work.
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    With T as
    (Select J.Pod,J.Hostname, P.Pod Portal_Pod,P.Hostname Portal_Hostname
    From Total_Pod J
    full outer join Portal_Tmp P On (J.Pod = P.Pod And J.Hostname = P.Hostname) ),
    U as
    (Select J.Pod,J.Hostname, s.Pod saasc_Pod,s.Hostname saasc_Hostname
    From Total_Pod J
    full outer join Saasc_Tmp S  On (J.Pod = s.Pod And J.Hostname = s.Hostname) ),
    V as
    (Select J.Pod,J.Hostname, a.Pod a3s_Pod,a.Hostname a3s_Hostname
    From Total_Pod J
    Full Outer Join A3s_Tmp A  On (J.Pod = A.Pod And J.Hostname = A.Hostname) )
    Select T.Pod,T.Hostname,nvl(T.Portal_Hostname,'Not Available') portal,nvl(U.Saasc_Hostname,'Not Available') saasc,NVL(V.A3s_Hostname,'Not Available') a3s From T,U,V
    Where T.Pod = U.Pod
    And U.Pod = V.Pod
    And T.Hostname = U.Hostname
    And U.Hostname = V.Hostname

  • Full Outer Join Help please

    Using : Oracle 11.2.0.1 on Windows XP
    create table tab40(bno varchar2(1),pno varchar2(7),weight number(3),lineno number(3));
    insert into tab40 values ('1','1115027',36,1);
    insert into tab40 values ('2','1115100',25,2);
    insert into tab40 values ('3','1115200',50,3);
    insert into tab40 values ('1','1112510',60,4);
    insert into tab40 values ('+','1112610',6,5);
    insert into tab40 values ('+','1112710',4,6);
    insert into tab40 values ('+','1110710',1,7);
    insert into tab40 values ('2','1117014',79,8);
    insert into tab40 values ('+','1117000',9,9);
    insert into tab40 values ('+','1117001',2,10);
    insert into tab40 values ('1','1317001',200,11);
    insert into tab40 values ('1','1697001',20,12);
    insert into tab40 values ('2','2997001',40,13);
    insert into tab40 values ('1','2996001',44,14);
    SQL> select * from tab40;
    B PNO         WEIGHT     LINENO
    1 1115027         36          1
    2 1115100         25          2
    3 1115200         50          3
    1 1112510         60          4
    + 1112610          6          5
    + 1112710          4          6
    + 1110710          1          7
    2 1117014         79          8
    + 1117000          9          9
    + 1117001          2         10
    1 1317001        200         11
    B PNO         WEIGHT     LINENO
    1 1697001         20         12
    2 2997001         40         13
    1 2996001         44         14
    14 rows selected.
    SQL>create table tab41(bno varchar2(1),pno varchar2(7),weight number(3),lineno number(3));
    insert into tab41 values ('1','1115027',36,1);
    insert into tab41 values ('2','1115100',25,2);
    insert into tab41 values ('3','1115200',50,3);
    insert into tab41 values ('1','1112510',60,4);
    insert into tab41 values ('+','1112610',6,5);
    insert into tab41 values ('+','1110710',1,6);
    insert into tab41 values ('2','1117014',79,7);
    insert into tab41 values ('+','1117000',9,8);
    insert into tab41 values ('1','1317001',200,9);
    insert into tab41 values ('1','1697001',20,10);
    insert into tab41 values ('2','2997001',40,11);
    insert into tab41 values ('1','2996001',44,12);
    insert into tab41 values ('+','1112710',4,13);
    insert into tab41 values ('+','3332710',8,14);
    SQL> select * from tab41;
    B PNO         WEIGHT     LINENO
    1 1115027         36          1
    2 1115100         25          2
    3 1115200         50          3
    1 1112510         60          4
    + 1112610          6          5
    + 1110710          1          6
    2 1117014         79          7
    + 1117000          9          8
    1 1317001        200          9
    1 1697001         20         10
    2 2997001         40         11
    B PNO         WEIGHT     LINENO
    1 2996001         44         12
    + 1112710          4         13
    + 3332710          8         14
    14 rows selected.
    SQL>Required Output :
    A       B          C          D        E       F          G          H
    1 1112510         60          4        1 2996001         44         12
    + 1112710          4          6        + 1112710          4         13
    2 1117014         79          8
    + 1117001          2         10
                                           1 2996001         44         12
                                           + 3332710          8         14Logic : The plus sign in Bno indicates that Packet No. was sent to customer with last non plus signed number packet (order by lineno) i.e. for example in tab40 there is line no. 6 whose master packet number is 1112510 (previous non plus signed rows's PNO). Now come to required output; which is showing that these plus signed packets (whose master PNO is that) are not as per tab40 vs tab41 something like full outer join between tab40 and tab41. Example :
    + 1112710 is associated with 1112510 in tab40, while in tab41 it is associated with 2996001; so it is difference.
    + 1117001 is associated with 1117014 in tab40, while it is not in tab41.
    vice versa;
    + 3332710 is associated with 2996001 in tab41, while it is not in tab40.
    I mean, if only plus marked row's PNO's mater packet number is not equal to master PNO(previous non plus marked BNO) in both the table, it should be part of the select query please. Generally this happens, when our packing department gets late delivery of prior master packet, so they just send the small packet with immediate available one (non plus) packet.
    Kindly let me; i am clear in my request or i should elaborate more. This may be more complex, because may be bad table/data design, but i need the output by select query please help me.
    Regards.
    Edited by: user12050217 on Jan 3, 2012 3:57 AM

    Yes, you have perfectly understood my question... just i added lineno > 1
    SELECT bno,
    pno,
    weight,
    lineno
    FROM ( SELECT tab40.*, lag (bno) OVER (ORDER BY pno) prev_bno
    FROM tab40
    ORDER BY pno)
    WHERE bno = '+' OR prev_bno = '+' and lineno > 1
    ORDER BY lineno
    and it worked, because there are no chances that plus marked row will be having lineno <=1
    B PNO         WEIGHT     LINENO
    1 1112510         60          4
    + 1112610          6          5
    + 1112710          4          6
    + 1110710          1          7
    2 1117014         79          8
    + 1117000          9          9
    + 1117001          2         10
    7 rows selected.

  • Query with multiple outer joins

    I had a doubt with whether the following kind of query is valid with multiple outer-joins. The format of the query is something like this:-
    select A.col1, B.col2
    from table1 A, table2 B, table3 C where
    A.col3=B.col4(+) and B.col5=C.col6(+)
    This would mean the follwoing with regard to outer-joins in the query.
    1) fetch records with col3 in table A matching or not matching col4 in table B
    2) fetch records with col5 in table B matching or not matching col6 in table C
    So, this query is valid?
    I hope, my question is clear.
    Please, help in solving the doubt.
    regards

    This is valid and it works fine

  • Repalcing UNIOn with full outer Join

    I have a query wihch looks like ,
    select colA,colB ,colC, coldD from A,B,C,D
    where (some join conditions)
    union
    select colA,colB ,colC, NULL from A,B,C
    where (some join conditions)
    This query is posing us serious performance issues and we want to tune the query.
    SO to remove the UNION operator we want to use FULL JOIN.
    Can you please let us know how to frame the full outer join in the above query,so that the result set intact.
    Thanks Much

      Here goes my first query that uses UNION :
    SELECT  from_it.seq_routing,
           from_it.milestone_routing_dt,
           from_it.milestone_type_desc,
           to_it.seq_routing,
           to_it.milestone_routing_dt,
           to_it.milestone_type_desc,
           to_it.delay_flag,
           to_it.acceptable_delay_flag,
           TAB_A.calendar_minutes, TAB_A.business_minutes,
           TAB_A.due_date, TAB_A.late_minutes,
           TAB_A.delay_concat_comments,TAB_C.TAB_C_key,
           TAB_C.pcd,TAB_C.ssn,
           mmp.MEASURE_NAME,
           api.METRICS_PARAMETER_KEY,
    api.METRICS_PARAMETER_PRODUCT_KEY,
    crt.JUSTIFICATION_CD,
    crt.JUSTIFICATION_DESC,
    crt.ROUTING_USER_SITE_DESC
      FROM TAB_A, TAB_B from_it, TAB_B to_it,
      TAB_C, TAB_E,TAB_D mmp,TAB_F api, TAB_G crt
    WHERE from_it.TAB_B_key =
                                      TAB_A.from_TAB_B_key
       AND to_it.TAB_B_key =
                                        TAB_A.to_TAB_B_key
       ANDTAB_C.TAB_C_key = from_it.TAB_C_key
       andTAB_C.TAB_C_key = to_it.TAB_C_key
       and TAB_E.pck =crt.pck
       and to_it.SEQ_ROUTING  =crt.SEQ_ROUTING
       and TAB_E.pcd =TAB_C.pcd
       and TAB_E.ssn =TAB_C.ssn
       andTAB_C.END_DT = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
       and TAB_A.METRICS_MEASURE_KEY =mmp.METRICS_MEASURE_KEY
       andapi.END_DT = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
       andTAB_C.TAB_C_key =api.TAB_C_KEY
       andapi.PARAMETER_TYPE = 'IN'
    and TAB_A.end_dt = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
    and CRT.end_dt  = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
    UNION
    SELECT  from_it.seq_routing,
           from_it.milestone_routing_dt,
           from_it.milestone_type_desc,
           to_it.seq_routing,
           to_it.milestone_routing_dt,
           to_it.milestone_type_desc,
           to_it.delay_flag,
           to_it.acceptable_delay_flag,
           TAB_A.calendar_minutes, TAB_A.business_minutes,
           TAB_A.due_date, TAB_A.late_minutes,
           TAB_A.delay_concat_comments,TAB_C.TAB_C_key,
           TAB_C.pcd,TAB_C.ssn,
           mmp.MEASURE_NAME,
           api.METRICS_PARAMETER_KEY,
    api.METRICS_PARAMETER_PRODUCT_KEY,
    NULL, NULL, NULL
      FROM TAB_A, TAB_B from_it, TAB_B to_it,
      TAB_C, TAB_E,TAB_D mmp,TAB_F api
    WHERE from_it.TAB_B_key =
                                      TAB_A.from_TAB_B_key
       AND to_it.TAB_B_key =
                                        TAB_A.to_TAB_B_key
       ANDTAB_C.TAB_C_key = from_it.TAB_C_key
       andTAB_C.TAB_C_key = to_it.TAB_C_key
       and TAB_E.pcd =TAB_C.pcd
       and TAB_E.ssn =TAB_C.ssn
       andTAB_C.END_DT = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
       and TAB_A.METRICS_MEASURE_KEY =mmp.METRICS_MEASURE_KEY
       andapi.END_DT = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
       andTAB_C.TAB_C_key =api.TAB_C_KEY
       andapi.PARAMETER_TYPE = 'IN'
       and to_it.SEQ_ROUTING is null
    and TAB_A.end_dt = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
    And the one with OUTER JOIN used :
    SELECT  from_it.seq_routing,
           from_it.milestone_routing_dt,
           from_it.milestone_type_desc,
           to_it.seq_routing,
           to_it.milestone_routing_dt,
           to_it.milestone_type_desc,
           to_it.delay_flag,
           to_it.acceptable_delay_flag,
           TAB_A.calendar_minutes, TAB_A.business_minutes,
           TAB_A.due_date, TAB_A.late_minutes,
           TAB_A.delay_concat_comments,TAB_C.TAB_C_key,
           TAB_C.pcd,TAB_C.ssn,
           mmp.MEASURE_NAME,
           api.METRICS_PARAMETER_KEY,
    api.METRICS_PARAMETER_PRODUCT_KEY,
    crt.JUSTIFICATION_CD,
    crt.JUSTIFICATION_DESC,
    crt.ROUTING_USER_SITE_DESC
      FROM TAB_A  JOIN
      TAB_B from_it
      on  from_it.TAB_B_key =
                                      TAB_A.from_TAB_B_key
                      and TAB_A.end_dt = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
             JOIN
      TAB_B to_it
      ON to_it.TAB_B_key =
                                        TAB_A.to_TAB_B_key
                        JOINTAB_C
    ONTAB_C.TAB_C_key = from_it.TAB_C_key
    ANDTAB_C.TAB_C_key = to_it.TAB_C_key    
    andTAB_C.END_DT = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')                
      JOINTAB_D mmp
      ON TAB_A.METRICS_MEASURE_KEY =mmp.METRICS_MEASURE_KEY
      JOIN TAB_E
      ON  TAB_E.pcd =TAB_C.pcd
       and TAB_E.ssn =TAB_C.ssn
      -- and TAB_E.ssn = 'PFEARG'
    JOINTAB_F api
    ON   TAB_C.TAB_C_key =api.TAB_C_KEY
       andapi.PARAMETER_TYPE = 'IN'
       andapi.END_DT = TO_DATE('12/31/9999', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
      LEFT

  • Strange bug with Full Outer Join

    Hi guys,
    can you please confirm this behaviour on 11gR2? It used to work fine on 10gR1.
    Small test case:
    create table TEST_OBJECT_METADATA
      project_name  VARCHAR2(30 CHAR) not null,
      object_id     NUMBER not null
    create table TEST_OBJECT_INFO
      object_id          NUMBER not null,
      object_type        VARCHAR2(30) not null
    create table TEST_SUPPORTED_OBJECTS
      object_type    VARCHAR2(30 CHAR) not null,
      enabled        NUMBER(1));
    INSERT INTO TEST_OBJECT_METADATA VALUES ('NEW',1);
    INSERT INTO TEST_OBJECT_INFO VALUES (1, 'TABLE');
    INSERT INTO TEST_SUPPORTED_OBJECTS VALUES ('TABLE',1);
    COMMIT;When I execute the following query:
    WITH old_project AS
    (SELECT oi.object_type,
             oi.object_id
        FROM test_object_metadata om,
             test_object_info     oi
       WHERE om.object_id = oi.object_id
         AND project_name = 'OLD'),
    new_project AS
    (SELECT oi.object_type,
             oi.object_id
        FROM test_object_metadata om,
             test_object_info     oi
       WHERE om.object_id = oi.object_id
         AND project_name = 'NEW')
    SELECT src.object_type,
               t.enabled
      FROM (SELECT nvl(o.object_type, n.object_type) object_type
              FROM old_project o
              FULL OUTER JOIN new_project n
                ON o.object_id = n.object_id) src,
           test_supported_objects t
    WHERE src.object_type = t.object_type(+);I get the following output:
    OBJECT_TYPE     ENABLED
    TABLE             So, the outer join to test_supported_objects does not match.
    But if I force the FULL OUTER JOIN to run first using rownum:
    WITH old_project AS
    (SELECT oi.object_type,
             oi.object_id
        FROM test_object_metadata om,
             test_object_info     oi
       WHERE om.object_id = oi.object_id
         AND project_name = 'OLD'),
    new_project AS
    (SELECT oi.object_type,
             oi.object_id
        FROM test_object_metadata om,
             test_object_info     oi
       WHERE om.object_id = oi.object_id
         AND project_name = 'NEW')
    SELECT src.object_type,
               t.enabled
      FROM (SELECT nvl(o.object_type, n.object_type) object_type,
                           rownum
              FROM old_project o
              FULL OUTER JOIN new_project n
                ON o.object_id = n.object_id) src,
           test_supported_objects t
    WHERE src.object_type = t.object_type(+);I get the expected output:
    OBJECT_TYPE     ENABLED
    TABLE             1 Thanks in advance.

    Without mixing works fine:
    WITH old_project AS
    (SELECT oi.object_type,
             oi.object_id
        FROM test_object_metadata om,
             test_object_info     oi
       WHERE om.object_id = oi.object_id
         AND project_name = 'OLD'),
    new_project AS
    (SELECT oi.object_type,
             oi.object_id
        FROM test_object_metadata om,
             test_object_info     oi
       WHERE om.object_id = oi.object_id
         AND project_name = 'NEW')
    SELECT src.object_type,
           t.enabled
      FROM (SELECT nvl(o.object_type, n.object_type) object_type
              FROM old_project o,
                   new_project n   
              where  o.object_id = n.object_id(+)
              UNION
              SELECT nvl(o.object_type, n.object_type) object_type
              FROM old_project o,
                   new_project n   
              where  o.object_id(+) = n.object_id) src,
           test_supported_objects t
    WHERE src.object_type = t.object_type(+);but there shouldn't be any restrictions on mixing them, right?

  • Full Outer Join Help Needed

    Hi All,
    I am new to crystal and my sql.
    l have 2 command objects in that i have a common column pos_no.Now i need to apply Fullouterjoin between pos_no,but in crystal we don,t have that option.
    So i saw some threads that we need to apply leftouterjoin union rightouterjoin to get FOJ in db level ,i tried ,but i don't have much knowledge in my sql.So can any one please apply FOJ between Pos_no of these two queries.
    Please help me i strucked here
    1st Query:
    select
    MIN(till_close.start_transaction_id) AS start_trans_id,
    MAX(till_close.end_transaction_id) AS end_trans_id,
    pos_config.pos_no,
    pos_config.name AS pos_name,
    SUM(transaction_tender.amount) AS EodDeposit
    FROM
    till_close
    LEFT OUTER JOIN employee ON (till_close.employee_id = employee.employee_id)
    INNER JOIN pos_config ON (till_close.pos_config_id = pos_config.pos_config_id)
    INNER JOIN transaction_tender ON (till_close.end_transaction_id = transaction_tender.transaction_id)
    INNER JOIN media_type ON (transaction_tender.media_type_id = media_type.media_type_id)
    WHERE
      DATE_FORMAT(till_close.transaction_date,'%d/%m/%Y') = DATE_FORMAT(STR_TO_DATE(?,'%d/%m/%Y'),'%d/%m/%Y')
    AND transaction_tender.media_type_id NOT IN (10000)
    GROUP BY
    pos_config.pos_no
    ORDER BY
    pos_config.pos_no
    2nd Query:
    select
    pos_config.pos_no,
    pos_config.name AS pos_name,
    SUM(CASE WHEN transaction.transaction_type_id=7 AND ((SELECT COUNT(transaction_id) FROM transaction_tender WHERE transaction_id = transaction.transaction_id  AND media_type_id IN (SELECT media_type_id FROM media_type WHERE tender_type_id=12) AND amount < 0 )>0) THEN 0
      WHEN  transaction_tender.balance < 0
      THEN transaction_tender.amount
      ELSE (transaction_tender.amount - transaction_tender.balance)
      END) AS net
    FROM
    TRANSACTION
    INNER JOIN transaction_tender ON (transaction.transaction_id = transaction_tender.transaction_id)
    INNER JOIN media_type ON (transaction_tender.media_type_id = media_type.media_type_id)
    INNER JOIN pos_config ON (transaction.pos_config_id = pos_config.pos_config_id)
    WHERE
    transaction.transaction_date = DATE_FORMAT(STR_TO_DATE(?, '%d/%m/%Y'), '%Y-%m-%d')
    AND transaction.transaction_type_id IN (1,5,7)
    AND transaction.transaction_status_id = 3
    AND transaction.is_training_mode = 0
    GROUP BY
    pos_config.pos_no

    hi Divya,
    i would definitely take the advice from the folks here on a rewrite of your commands into one command.
    since you've got 2 commands that are bringing back different results you may wish to consider bringing back the results from the 2nd command via a sub-query.
    the general idea of the query is below, but you'll need to consult your online help for your database and or your dba for the correct syntax for your situation.
    notes:
    1) the subselect is in the bold font and is defined as a result set in the join...again, please consult your database help or the appropriated forum for your database as your syntax may vary
    2) the fields in the subquery are then referenced in the select clause using the TT alias assigned to the result set in the join
    3) the full outer join i guessed that you wanted on the two pos_no fields
    4) if you do try to do this method and are looking on your database forum, do a search on "subquery multiple columns"
    cheers,
    jamie
    select
    MIN(till_close.start_transaction_id) AS start_trans_id,
    MAX(till_close.end_transaction_id) AS end_trans_id,
    pos_config.pos_no AS PC_pos_no,
    pos_config.name AS pos_name AS PC_pos_name,
    SUM(transaction_tender.amount) AS EodDeposit,
    TT.pos_no AS TT_pos_no,
    TT.pos_name AS TT_pos_name,
    TT.net
    FROM
    till_close
    LEFT OUTER JOIN employee ON (till_close.employee_id = employee.employee_id)
    INNER JOIN pos_config ON (till_close.pos_config_id = pos_config.pos_config_id)
    INNER JOIN transaction_tender ON (till_close.end_transaction_id = transaction_tender.transaction_id)
    INNER JOIN media_type ON (transaction_tender.media_type_id = media_type.media_type_id)
    FULL OUTER JOIN
    (select
    pos_config.pos_no,
    pos_config.pos_name,
    SUM(CASE WHEN transaction.transaction_type_id=7 AND ((SELECT COUNT(transaction_id) FROM transaction_tender WHERE transaction_id = transaction.transaction_id  AND media_type_id IN (SELECT media_type_id FROM media_type WHERE tender_type_id=12) AND amount < 0 )>0) THEN 0
      WHEN  transaction_tender.balance < 0
      THEN transaction_tender.amount
      ELSE (transaction_tender.amount - transaction_tender.balance)
      END) AS net
    FROM
    TRANSACTION
    INNER JOIN transaction_tender ON (transaction.transaction_id = transaction_tender.transaction_id)
    INNER JOIN media_type ON (transaction_tender.media_type_id = media_type.media_type_id)
    INNER JOIN pos_config ON (transaction.pos_config_id = pos_config.pos_config_id)
    WHERE
    transaction.transaction_date = DATE_FORMAT(STR_TO_DATE(?, '%d/%m/%Y'), '%Y-%m-%d')
    AND transaction.transaction_type_id IN (1,5,7)
    AND transaction.transaction_status_id = 3
    AND transaction.is_training_mode = 0
    GROUP BY
    pos_config.pos_no) AS TT
    ON TT.pos_no =  pos_config.pos_no
    WHERE
      DATE_FORMAT(till_close.transaction_date,'%d/%m/%Y') = DATE_FORMAT(STR_TO_DATE(?,'%d/%m/%Y'),'%d/%m/%Y')
    AND transaction_tender.media_type_id NOT IN (10000)
    GROUP BY
    pos_config.pos_no
    ORDER BY
    pos_config.pos_no

  • Granting SELECT to user on VIEW with FULL OUTER JOIN fails?

    I have a quandary.
    Using Oracle 9i, I have created a simple view. When I perform a count on it, rows are returned.
    However, when I grant SELECT access to another user, they can't see the VIEW. The VIEW has a FULL OUTER JOIN operation in it.
    When I do the same thing using a regular join, it works.
    Any ideas why, please?
    SQL> conn ifsinfo/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
      1  create view mctest3 as
      2  select
      3   vc.idcus ,
      4   ci.customer_id
      5  from
      6   ifsapp.vmo_company vc
      7  full outer join
      8   ifsapp.customer_info ci
      9  on
    10*  vc.custno = ci.customer_id
    SQL> /
    View created.
    SQL> select count(*) from mctest3;
      COUNT(*)
         73994
    SQL> GRANT SELECT ON MCTEST3 TO IFSAPP WITH GRANT OPTION;
    Grant succeeded.
    SQL> CONN IFSAPP/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> select count(*) from IFSINFO.MCTEST3;
    select count(*) from IFSINFO.MCTEST3
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00942: table or view does not existbut with regular join:
    SQL> conn ifsinfo/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> create view mctest4 as
      2    select
      3     vc.idcus ,
      4     ci.customer_id
      5    from
      6     ifsapp.vmo_company vc, ifsapp.customer_info ci
      7    where vc.custno = ci.customer_id;
    View created.
    SQL> select count(*) from mctest4;
      COUNT(*)
         44269
    SQL> GRANT SELECT ON MCTEST4 TO IFSAPP WITH GRANT OPTION;
    Grant succeeded.
    SQL> conn ifsapp/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> select count(*) from IFSINFO.MCTEST4;
      COUNT(*)
         44269

    Hi,
    >>SQL> conn ifsinfo/******@DB
    Connected.
    SQL> ed
    Wrote file afiedt.buf
    1 create view mctest3 as
    2 select
    3 vc.idcus ,
    4 ci.customer_id
    5 from
    6 ifsapp.vmo_company vc
    7 full outer join
    8 ifsapp.customer_info ci
    9 on
    10* vc.custno = ci.customer_id
    SQL> /
    According to Note:244315.1, it is not possible to make a FULL OUTER JOIN on views owned by another user at the 9i version of Oracle. As above, do not use FULL OUTER JOIN on views owned by another user. Try to use outer join operator (+), and/or UNIONS instead.
    Cheers

  • Query of query with left outer join

    Hi,
    I cannot use joins in query of query, I try the old method using the ( + ) but no luck "Query Of Queries syntax error. Encountered ( + )."
    Here is an example of my query code:
    select p.part_id, s.supplier_name, s.second_name
    from part p, supplier s
    where p.supplier_id = s.supplier_id ( + )
    and  p.second_id = s.second_id ( + );
    PART SUPPLIER_NAME  SECOND_NAME
    P1   Supplier#1     A
    P2   Supplier#2
    P3
    P4
    How can I do the same in query of query syntax?
    Thanks!

    I found a solution:
    http://www.bealearts.co.uk/blog/2007/06/20/how-to-do-an-outer-join-in-query-of-queries/
    I am not sure about my second condition. i create the join query for the empty columns.
    select part.part_id, supplier.supplier_name, supplier.second_name
    from part, supplier
    where part.supplier_id = supplier.supplier_id
    and  supplier.second_id is null
    union
    select part.part_id, supplier.supplier_name, supplier.second_name
    from part, supplier
    where part.supplier_id = supplier.supplier_id
    and  part.second_id = supplier.second_id
    union
    select part.part_id, joinQuery.supplier_name, joinQuery.second_name
    from part, joinQuery
    where part.supplier_id not in (#ValueList(supplier.supplier_id)#)
    Can anyone check and let me know if this is correct?
    My final result have one less row from parts table.
    Thanks

  • Using full outer join of subqueries named using with clause

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a view which is having 2 subqueries vol1 & vol2 with WITH clause. I am joining those 2 subqueries in the main query with FULL OUTER JOIN.
    When i compile that view in a tool like pl/sql developer, It has been compiled successfully.
    But when i call the view creation script from SQL command prompt, It is throwing error as
    from vol1 FULL JOIN vol2 o ON (vol1.ct_reference = vol2.ct_reference and vol1.table_name = vol2.table_name
    ERROR at line 29:
    ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
    Kindly advise whats going wrong.

    that's line 29. Maybe you get a better idea if you strip your operation of all the unneccessary elements until it works.
    There are some known bugs with subquery factoring (aka with clause) and also with ANSI join syntax, but it is hard to tell what happens here based on your description. But one thing is strange - if it is not a result of formatting (not formatting): I would expect the asterisk beneath the unknown table and not beneath the key word FULL.
    P.S.: my editor makes me think it's rather a proportional font thing. Have I already said that I don't like proportional font for SQL code examples?

  • OWB does not allow full outer join

    I got following error (twice) while validating my mapping: "VLD-1506: Invalid Expression: Mixing full and partial outer joins in one mapping is not supported".
    I have following join conditions in my mapping:
    1) INGRP1.DISTRICT_ID = INGRP2.DISTRICT_ID And INGRP1.CHARGE_PERIOD_ID = INGRP2.CHARGE_PERIOD_ID And INGRP1.UTL_ID = INGRP2.UTL_ID
    2) The same
    3) INGRP1.CHARGE_PERIOD_ID (+) = INGRP2.CHARGE_PERIOD_ID (+) And
    INGRP1.DISTRICT_ID (+) = INGRP2.DISTRICT_ID (+) And
    INGRP1.PROVIDER# (+) = INGRP2.PROVIDER# (+)
    I suppose there is not any partial joins here. I tried to make first and second conditions with full outer joins too:
    INGRP1.DISTRICT_ID (+) = INGRP2.DISTRICT_ID (+) And
    INGRP1.CHARGE_PERIOD_ID (+) = INGRP2.CHARGE_PERIOD_ID (+) And
    INGRP1.UTL_ID (+) = INGRP2.UTL_ID (+) And
    INGRP1.DISTRICT_ID IS NOT NULL And
    INGRP2.DISTRICT_ID IS NOT NULL
    If I do this, validation reports the same error, but six times instead of twice.
    If I remove outer joins OWB generates following mapping statement:
    MERGE
    /*+ APPEND PARALLEL(MMB$ACCOUNT, DEFAULT, DEFAULT) */
    INTO
    "MMB$ACCOUNT"
    USING
    (SELECT
    /*+ NO_MERGE */
    "INGRP1"."DISTRICT_ID" "DISTRICT_ID",
    DIC$TIME_RECODER."MONTH_ID" "MONTH_ID",
    "INGRP1"."PROVIDER#" "PROVIDER#",
    "INGRP1"."ACCOUNT_NO" "ACCOUNT_NO",
    "INGRP2"."ACCOUNT_NO" "ACCOUNT_NO_1"
    FROM "DIC$TIME_RECODER" DIC$TIME_RECODER,
    (SELECT
    /*+ DRIVING_SITE("AGG"."AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."FC_CHARGES_1_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR") */
    "AGG"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID",
    "AGG"."DISTRICT_ID$0" "DISTRICT_ID",
    "AGG"."PROVIDER#$0" "PROVIDER#",
    "AGG"."ACCOUNT_NO$0" "ACCOUNT_NO"
    FROM (SELECT
    ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$0") "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID",
    ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."DISTRICT_ID$1") "DISTRICT_ID$0",
    ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."PROVIDER#$1") "PROVIDER#$0",
    COUNT(DISTINCT ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."ACCOUNT_NO$1")) "ACCOUNT_NO$0"
    FROM (SELECT
    "INGRP1"."DISTRICT_ID" "DISTRICT_ID$1",
    "INGRP1"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$0",
    DM_UTILITIES_1_GKH_R14554."PROVIDER#" "PROVIDER#$1",
    "FC_CHARGES_1_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."ACCOUNT_NO" "ACCOUNT_NO$1"
    FROM {"FC_CHARGES"@GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR} "FC_CHARGES_1_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR",
    {"DM_UTILITIES"@GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR} DM_UTILITIES_1_GKH_R14554,
    (SELECT
    "DEDUP"."DISTRICT_ID$2" "DISTRICT_ID",
    "DEDUP"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$1" "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID",
    "DEDUP"."UTL_ID" "UTL_ID"
    FROM (SELECT
    DISTINCT
    "FC_CHARGES_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."DISTRICT_ID" "DISTRICT_ID$2",
    "FC_CHARGES_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$1",
    "FC_CHARGES_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."UTL_ID" "UTL_ID"
    FROM {"FC_CHARGES"@GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR} "FC_CHARGES_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR" WHERE ( (MAP_DIC$ACCOUNT."DATE_START") <= coalesce ( "FC_CHARGES_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."CHANGED_DATE_#" , "FC_CHARGES_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."CREATED_DATE_#" ) )) "DEDUP" ) "INGRP1" WHERE ( "INGRP1"."DISTRICT_ID" = "FC_CHARGES_1_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."DISTRICT_ID" ) AND
    ( "INGRP1"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" = "FC_CHARGES_1_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" ) AND
    ( "INGRP1"."UTL_ID" = "FC_CHARGES_1_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."UTL_ID" ) AND
    ( ( DM_UTILITIES_1_GKH_R14554."UTL_ID" (+) = "INGRP1"."UTL_ID" ) )) "AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY"
    GROUP BY
    ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."DISTRICT_ID$1"), ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$0"), ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY"."PROVIDER#$1")) "AGG" ) "INGRP1",
    (SELECT
    /*+ DRIVING_SITE("AGG_1"."AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY$0"."FC_PAYMENTS_1_GKH_RE143940") */
    "AGG_1"."PROVIDER#$2" "PROVIDER#",
    "AGG_1"."DISTRICT_ID$3" "DISTRICT_ID",
    "AGG_1"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$2" "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID",
    "AGG_1"."ACCOUNT_NO$2" "ACCOUNT_NO"
    FROM (SELECT
    ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY$0"."PROVIDER#$3") "PROVIDER#$2",
    ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY$0"."DISTRICT_ID$4") "DISTRICT_ID$3",
    ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY$0"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$3") "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$2",
    COUNT(DISTINCT ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY$0"."ACCOUNT_NO$3")) "ACCOUNT_NO$2"
    FROM (SELECT
    "INGRP1"."DISTRICT_ID" "DISTRICT_ID$4",
    "INGRP1"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$3",
    DM_UTILITIES_GKH_REL2_GKH."PROVIDER#" "PROVIDER#$3",
    "FC_PAYMENTS_1_GKH_RE143940"."ACCOUNT_NO" "ACCOUNT_NO$3"
    FROM {"FC_PAYMENTS"@GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR} "FC_PAYMENTS_1_GKH_RE143940",
    {"DM_UTILITIES"@GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR} DM_UTILITIES_GKH_REL2_GKH,
    (SELECT
    "DEDUP_1"."DISTRICT_ID$5" "DISTRICT_ID",
    "DEDUP_1"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$4" "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID",
    "DEDUP_1"."UTL_ID$0" "UTL_ID"
    FROM (SELECT
    DISTINCT
    "FC_PAYMENTS_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."DISTRICT_ID" "DISTRICT_ID$5",
    "FC_PAYMENTS_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" "CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$4",
    "FC_PAYMENTS_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."UTL_ID" "UTL_ID$0"
    FROM {"FC_PAYMENTS"@GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR} "FC_PAYMENTS_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR" WHERE ( (MAP_DIC$ACCOUNT."DATE_START") <= coalesce ( "FC_PAYMENTS_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."CHANGED_DATE_#" , "FC_PAYMENTS_GKH_REL2_GKH_STAR"."CREATED_DATE_#" ) )) "DEDUP_1" ) "INGRP1" WHERE ( "INGRP1"."DISTRICT_ID" = "FC_PAYMENTS_1_GKH_RE143940"."DISTRICT_ID" ) AND
    ( "INGRP1"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" = "FC_PAYMENTS_1_GKH_RE143940"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" ) AND
    ( "INGRP1"."UTL_ID" = "FC_PAYMENTS_1_GKH_RE143940"."UTL_ID" ) AND
    ( ( DM_UTILITIES_GKH_REL2_GKH."UTL_ID" (+) = "INGRP1"."UTL_ID" ) )) "AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY$0"
    GROUP BY
    ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY$0"."DISTRICT_ID$4"), ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY$0"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID$3"), ("AGG_INPUT_SUBQUERY$0"."PROVIDER#$3")) "AGG_1" ) "INGRP2" WHERE ( "INGRP1"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" = "INGRP2"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" ) AND
    ( "INGRP1"."DISTRICT_ID" = "INGRP2"."DISTRICT_ID" ) AND
    ( "INGRP1"."PROVIDER#" = "INGRP2"."PROVIDER#" ) AND
    ( ( DIC$TIME_RECODER."PERIOD_ID" (+) = "INGRP1"."CHARGE_PERIOD_ID" ) )
    ) "MERGEQUERY_325"
    ON (
    "MMB$ACCOUNT"."DISTRICT_ID" = "MERGEQUERY_325"."DISTRICT_ID" AND
    "MMB$ACCOUNT"."MONTH_ID" = "MERGEQUERY_325"."MONTH_ID" AND
    "MMB$ACCOUNT"."PROVIDER_ID" = "MERGEQUERY_325"."PROVIDER#" )
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
    INSERT
    ("MMB$ACCOUNT"."DISTRICT_ID",
    "MMB$ACCOUNT"."MONTH_ID",
    "MMB$ACCOUNT"."PROVIDER_ID",
    "MMB$ACCOUNT"."QNT_CHARGED",
    "MMB$ACCOUNT"."QNT_PAID")
    VALUES
    ("MERGEQUERY_325"."DISTRICT_ID",
    "MERGEQUERY_325"."MONTH_ID",
    "MERGEQUERY_325"."PROVIDER#",
    "MERGEQUERY_325"."ACCOUNT_NO",
    "MERGEQUERY_325"."ACCOUNT_NO_1")
    WHEN MATCHED THEN
    UPDATE
    SET
    "QNT_CHARGED" = "MERGEQUERY_325"."ACCOUNT_NO",
    "QNT_PAID" = "MERGEQUERY_325"."ACCOUNT_NO_1";
    What does it mean? Is JOINER's full outer join is incompatible with KEY LOOKUP operator and KL should be replaced with WB_LOOKUP_NUM?

    Sanders,
    Key lookup always does a partial outer join. When the full outer join and partial outer join conditions are put together, there is no available syntax to facilitate it.
    The way to this to generate the join operator (with full outer join) first in a subquery, then generate the key lookup as the outer query. Or the other way around, first the key lookup then the full outer join. The important part is that the key lookup can't be merged into the FROM-list.
    So there are two workarounds. One is what you already pointed out, using WB_LOOKUP_NUM.
    The other is to explicitly spell out the key lookup logic in the mapping by introducing a join with the lookup table, like this.
    Change
    Table1
    .......... Join (w/ foj cond.) ---> KeyLookup
    Table2
    to
    Table1
    .......... Join (w/ foj cond)
    Table2 ........................ Join (w/ poj cond.) ---> Lookup table
    Nikolai Rochnik

  • Help Required in full outer Join

    I feel the below query can be changed to full outer join. But, I've not been able to do so.
    I require your help in changing it to full outer join. My current query is
    SELECT CLAIMNO,'1' INDX FROM D_CLAIM@CMS2PROD
    WHERE clntsys=76500 and facility=76501 and filecreatedt='18-feb-2011' and fileupdatedt is null
    MINUS
    SELECT CLAIMNO,'1' FROM D_CLAIM
    WHERE clntsys=76500 and facility=76501 and filecreatedt='18-feb-2011' and fileupdatedt is null
    UNION
    SELECT CLAIMNO,'2' FROM D_CLAIM
    WHERE clntsys=76500 and facility=76501 and filecreatedt='18-feb-2011' and fileupdatedt is null
    MINUS
    SELECT CLAIMNO,'2' FROM D_CLAIM@cms2prod
    WHERE clntsys=76500 and facility=76501 and filecreatedt='18-feb-2011' and fileupdatedt is null

    donisback wrote:
    I feel the below query can be changed to full outer join. But, I've not been able to do so.
    I require your help in changing it to full outer join. My current query is
    SELECT CLAIMNO,'1' INDX FROM D_CLAIM@CMS2PROD
    WHERE clntsys=76500 and facility=76501 and filecreatedt='18-feb-2011' and fileupdatedt is null
    MINUS
    SELECT CLAIMNO,'1' FROM D_CLAIM
    WHERE clntsys=76500 and facility=76501 and filecreatedt='18-feb-2011' and fileupdatedt is null
    UNION
    SELECT CLAIMNO,'2' FROM D_CLAIM
    WHERE clntsys=76500 and facility=76501 and filecreatedt='18-feb-2011' and fileupdatedt is null
    MINUS
    SELECT CLAIMNO,'2' FROM D_CLAIM@cms2prod
    WHERE clntsys=76500 and facility=76501 and filecreatedt='18-feb-2011' and fileupdatedt is null
    I do not think that query is doing what you think that it is doing - on first inspection, it was not doing what I thought either due to the order in which the UNION and MINUS operators are performed. If the FILECREATEDT column is defined as a DATE, your query is relying on an implicit date conversion - in such a case, you should replace:
    filecreatedt='18-feb-2011'With:
    filecreatedt=TO_DATE('18-feb-2011','DD-MON-YYYY')Now, building a simple model to explain what is happening, we create two tables with 10 rows each. The first table has C1 values that increase by 2, while the second has C1 values that increase by 3:
    CREATE TABLE T1 AS
    SELECT
      ROWNUM*2 C1,
      TRUNC(SYSDATE)+ROWNUM*2 C2
    FROM
      DUAL
    CONNECT BY
      LEVEL<=10;
    CREATE TABLE T2 AS
    SELECT
      ROWNUM*3 C1,
      TRUNC(SYSDATE)+ROWNUM*3 C2
    FROM
      DUAL
    CONNECT BY
      LEVEL<=10;It appears that the intended result of your query is to obtain a distinct list of those rows that are in each table that are not in both tables - the UNION ALL minus the intersection of the rows in two tables. However, that is not what you are achieving with that query. To demonstrate, the two halves of your query:
    SELECT
      C1,
      C2
    FROM
      T1
    MINUS
    SELECT
      C1,
      C2
    FROM
      T2;
    C1 C2
    2 28-FEB-11
    4 02-MAR-11
    8 06-MAR-11
    10 08-MAR-11
    14 12-MAR-11
    16 14-MAR-11
    20 18-MAR-11
    SELECT
      C1,
      C2
    FROM
      T2
    MINUS
    SELECT
      C1,
      C2
    FROM
      T1;
    C1 C2
    3 01-MAR-11
    9 07-MAR-11
    15 13-MAR-11
    21 19-MAR-11
    24 22-MAR-11
    27 25-MAR-11
    30 28-MAR-11As can be seen by the above, each half returned 7 rows - there are 7 rows in each table that is not in the other table. Common sense would state that if we UNION these two results (assuming no duplicate values in each table), we would see 14 rows:
    SELECT
      C1,
      C2
    FROM
      T1
    MINUS
    SELECT
      C1,
      C2
    FROM
      T2
    UNION
    SELECT
      C1,
      C2
    FROM
      T2
    MINUS
    SELECT
      C1,
      C2
    FROM
      T1;
    C1 C2
    3 01-MAR-11
    9 07-MAR-11
    15 13-MAR-11
    21 19-MAR-11
    24 22-MAR-11
    27 25-MAR-11
    30 28-MAR-11Only 7 rows? Let's try again with the help of inline views to control the order in which the MINUS and UNION operators are processed:
    SELECT
    FROM
      (SELECT
        C1,
        C2
      FROM
        T1
      MINUS
      SELECT
        C1,
        C2
      FROM
        T2)
    UNION
    SELECT
    FROM
      (SELECT
        C1,
        C2
      FROM
        T2
      MINUS
      SELECT
        C1,
        C2
      FROM
        T1);
    C1 C2
    2 28-FEB-11
    3 01-MAR-11
    4 02-MAR-11
    8 06-MAR-11
    9 07-MAR-11
    10 08-MAR-11
    14 12-MAR-11
    15 13-MAR-11
    16 14-MAR-11
    20 18-MAR-11
    21 19-MAR-11
    24 22-MAR-11
    27 25-MAR-11
    30 28-MAR-11Note that the above returned 14 rows. We can do the same using just two outer joins:
    SELECT
      T1.C1,
      T1.C2
    FROM
      T1,
      T2
    WHERE
      T1.C1=T2.C1(+)
      AND T2.C1 IS NULL
    UNION
    SELECT
      T2.C1,
      T2.C2
    FROM
      T1,
      T2
    WHERE
      T2.C1=T1.C1(+)
      AND T1.C1 IS NULL;
    C1 C2
    2 28-FEB-11
    3 01-MAR-11
    4 02-MAR-11
    8 06-MAR-11
    9 07-MAR-11
    10 08-MAR-11
    14 12-MAR-11
    15 13-MAR-11
    16 14-MAR-11
    20 18-MAR-11
    21 19-MAR-11
    24 22-MAR-11
    27 25-MAR-11
    30 28-MAR-11Or we can do it with a full outer join and a MINUS operator:
    SELECT
      NVL(T1.C1,T2.C1) C1,
      NVL2(T1.C1,T1.C2,T2.C2) C2
    FROM
      T1 FULL OUTER JOIN T2
        ON T1.C1=T2.C1
    MINUS
    SELECT
      T1.C1,
      T1.C2
    FROM
      T1,
      T2
    WHERE
      T1.C1=T2.C1;
    C1 C2
    2 28-FEB-11
    3 01-MAR-11
    4 02-MAR-11
    8 06-MAR-11
    9 07-MAR-11
    10 08-MAR-11
    14 12-MAR-11
    15 13-MAR-11
    16 14-MAR-11
    20 18-MAR-11
    21 19-MAR-11
    24 22-MAR-11
    27 25-MAR-11
    30 28-MAR-11Or just with a full outer join with a WHERE clause:
    SELECT
      NVL(T1.C1,T2.C1) C1,
      NVL2(T1.C1,T1.C2,T2.C2) C2
    FROM
      T1 FULL OUTER JOIN T2
        ON T1.C1=T2.C1
    WHERE
      (T1.C1 IS NULL
        OR T2.C1 IS NULL);
    C1 C2
    3 01-MAR-11
    9 07-MAR-11
    15 13-MAR-11
    21 19-MAR-11
    24 22-MAR-11
    27 25-MAR-11
    30 28-MAR-11
    8 06-MAR-11
    20 18-MAR-11
    2 28-FEB-11
    10 08-MAR-11
    4 02-MAR-11
    14 12-MAR-11
    16 14-MAR-11With the above knowledge, you should be able to fix your SQL statement to produce the expected results.
    Charles Hooper
    Co-author of "Expert Oracle Practices: Oracle Database Administration from the Oak Table"
    http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/
    IT Manager/Oracle DBA
    K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

  • Full outer join query giving error

    Hi I have written the below query to get the fields below as an out put but am getting the error missing keyword..am not understanding where did i missed..i have done step by step query analysis..but could not find the error.
    Please help me in resolving the issue.
    Expected output Columns :*
    COUNTRY , TRN_TYPE ,SKU ,BIX_Customer ,PERIOD ,CURRENTSTOCK ,STOCK_VALUE ,SALES ,SALES_VALUE ,TARGET
    Query :_
    select (case when a.country is null then b.country when b.country is null then c.country else a.country end) AS COUNTRY,
    (case when a.Sale_Type is null then b.Stk_type when b.stk_type is null then c.Stk_type else a.Sale_Type end) AS TRN_TYPE,
    (case when a.sku is null then b.sku when b.sku is null then c.sku else a.sku end) AS SKU,
    (case when a.bix_customer is null then b.bix_customer_code when b.bix_customer_code is null then c.bix_customer_code else a.bix_customer end)AS BIX_Customer ,
    (case when a.period is null then TO_number(b.period) when b.period is null then TO_NUMBER(c.period) else a.period end) AS PERIOD,
    nvl(b.CURRENTSTOCK,0) AS CURRENTSTOCK,
    nvl(b.stock_value,0) AS STOCK_VALUE,
    nvl(a.sales,0) AS SALES,
    nvl(a.SALES_VALUE,0) AS SALES_VALUE,
    nvl(c.TARGET_QTY,0) AS TARGET
    from
    (select UPPER(c.cust_country_name) AS COUNTRY,
    DECODE(ds.account_key,7156,'SAMPLE',7157,'BONUS',7485,'SALE') AS Sale_Type,
    substr(i.item_code,7) AS SKU,
    c.bix_customer_code AS BIX_Customer,
    ds.descr as descr ,
    ds.period as period,
    sum(ds.quantity) AS SALES,
    sum(case when ds.local_value is null then ds.euro_value else ds.local_value END) AS SALES_VALUE
    FROM distributor_sales ds, customer c, item i
    where ds.customer_key=c.customer_key
    and ds.item_key= i.item_key
    group by ds.period,
    ds.account_key,
    c.cust_country_name,
    substr(i.item_code,7),
    c.bix_customer_code,
    ds.descr) a
    full outer join
    (SELECT UPPER(b.cust_country_name) AS COUNTRY,
    DECODE(s.stock_type,'SALE','SALE','SALES','SALE','BONUS','BONUS','SAMPLE','SAMPLE') AS Stk_type,
    substr(c.item_code,7) AS SKU,
    s.descr as descr,
    s.period as period,
    b.bix_customer_code,
    sum(s.CLOSING_STOCK) CURRENTSTOCK,
    sum(s.closing_stock*s.cif_price) STOCK_VALUE
    FROM STOCK s, customer b, item c
    WHERE s.customer_key=b.customer_key
    and s.item_key= c.item_key
    group by
    s.descr,
    s.stock_type,
    s.period, b.bix_customer_code,b.cust_country_name,substr(c.item_code,7) ) b
    full outer join
    (SELECT UPPER(cu.cust_country_name) AS COUNTRY,
    DECODE(t.description,'SALES TARGET','SALE') AS Stk_type,
    substr(it.item_code,7) AS SKU,
    t.channel as channel,
    t.period as period,
    cu.bix_customer_code as bix_customer_code,
    sum(t.quantity) TARGET_QTY
    FROM sales_target t, customer cu, item it
    WHERE t.customer_key=cu.customer_key
    and t.item_key= it.item_key
    group by
    t.channel,
    t.description,
    t.period, cu.bix_customer_code,cu.cust_country_name,substr(it.item_code,7) ) c
    on a.SKU=b.SKU
    and a.sku=c.SKU
    and b.sku=c.SKU
    and a.BIX_Customer=b.bix_customer_code
    and a.BIX_Customer=c.bix_customer_code
    and b.bix_customer_code=c.bix_customer_code
    and a.Sale_Type=b.Stk_type
    and a.Sale_Type=c.Stk_type
    and b.Stk_type=c.Stk_type
    and a.descr=b.descr
    and b.descr=c.channel
    and a.descr=c.channel
    and a.country=b.country
    and a.country=c.COUNTRY
    and b.country=c.COUNTRY
    and a.period=b.period
    and a.period=c.period
    and b.period=c.period;

    <tt>Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production</tt>
    You must be aware that you must cascade full outer joins
    with
    t1 as
    (select 1 key,1.1 data from dual union all
    select 3,1.3 from dual union all
    select 6,1.6 from dual union all
    select 7,1.7 from dual
    t2 as
    (select 2 key,2.2 data from dual union all
    select 3,2.3 from dual union all
    select 4,2.4 from dual union all
    select 6,2.6 from dual
    t3 as
    (select 4 key,3.4 data from dual union all
    select 5,3.5 from dual union all
    select 6,3.6 from dual union all
    select 7,3.7 from dual
    select nvl(x.key,t3.key) key,
           x.data_1,
           x.data_2,
           t3.data data_3
      from (select nvl(t1.key,t2.key) key,
                   t1.data data_1,
                   t2.data data_2
              from t1
                   full outer join
                   t2
                on t1.key = t2.key
           ) x
           full outer join
           t3
        on t3.key = x.key
    order by keyunless you can live with duplicate key rows you cannot avoid whenever all table pairs contain common keys (try the below using data from above)
    select coalesce(t1.key,t2.key,t3.key) key,
           t1.data data_1,
           t2.data data_2,
           t3.data data_3
      from t1
           full outer join
           t2
        on t1.key = t2.key
           full outer join
           t3
        on t3.key = t1.key
       and t3.key = t2.key
    order by key
    select coalesce(t1.key,t2.key,t3.key) key,
           t1.data data_1,
           t2.data data_2,
           t3.data data_3
      from t2
           full outer join
           t3
        on t2.key = t3.key
           full outer join
           t1
        on t1.key = t2.key
       and t1.key = t3.key
    order by key
    select coalesce(t1.key,t2.key,t3.key) key,
           t1.data data_1,
           t2.data data_2,
           t3.data data_3
      from t1
           full outer join
           t3
        on t1.key = t3.key
           full outer join
           t2
        on t2.key = t1.key
       and t2.key = t3.key
    order by keyRegards
    Etbin
    Edited by: Etbin on 10.4.2013 9:53
    If you're after
    select *
      from (select *
              from (select *
                      from t1
                   ) a
                   full outer join
                   (select *
                      from t2
                   ) b
                on t1.key = t2.key
           ) x
           full outer join
           t3
        on t3.key = x.key
    order by keyyou're presently at
    select *
      from (
                   (select *
                      from t1
                   ) a
                   full outer join
                   (select *
                      from t2
                   ) b
                on t1.key = t2.key
           ) x
           full outer join
           t3
        on t3.key = x.key
    order by keyORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to recover a Yoga tablet 2 with Windows 8.1

    How to : Recover a Yoga tablet 2 version with Windows 8.1 Bing  In case of emergency, if you need this option , or other circumstances ... last hope ..   ..works without keyboard ... Yoga tab 2 as tablet itself ...equipped with three manual function

  • Classic freezes after opening a Microsoft osX app

    I'm still running Quark 5 under classic (classic boots on startup and quark is a startup item) and if I then open a Microsoft App in X and click back on Quark all I get is the spinning watch icon. (I think this has only started happening since upgrad

  • Setting background color for a region

    Hi, I am using apex 4.0. I am trying to set a background color to the report region and i tried different options and did not work for me. Can someone help me with this one in setting up a background color inside a region. Thanks, Rik Edited by: Rik2

  • Automatic service setup with network accounts

    Hi all, I'm having terrible trouble getting automatic service (e.g. iCal, iChat, etc.) setup to work with network accounts, either with network home directories or local home directories, and I can't work out what I'm doing wrong. When I log in as a

  • Can I convert a PDF back into a PUB file?

    Can I convert a PDF back into a PUB file?