SAP Human Capital Best Practice Reports

Hi friends!!!
I'm currently working with a client that is looking for a list of SAP Human Capital Best Practice Reports. I'm having difficulty finding a list of SAP HCM best practice reports. Does anyone have a list? Or can you point me in the right direction?
Thanks in Advance
Thanks & Regards

Hi
Program Description
H99CWTR0
Wage Type Reporter. Returns pay for particular wage types. To submit from new report you will need to create copy and export value to memory.
RHGRENZ0
Delimit IT1000 and related 1001s. Program will delete any 1001 infotypes whose start date is after the delimit date.
RHGRENZ1
Extend the end date on delimited records. Very useful when you delimit a bunch of records incorrectly, and need to change the end date.
RHGRENZ2
Delimit infotypes (IT1001)
RPCMPYG0
Statutory Maternity Pay(SMP)
RPCSSPG0_HIST
Statutory Sickness History(SSP)
RPDTRA00
List all HR transactions and there uses
RPTPSH10
Personal work schedule, also accessed via PA20/PA30 infotype 2001
RPUAUD00
HR Report to list all logged changes in infotype data for an employee. Uses the PCL4 Audit Cluster.
RPUAUDDL
HR Report to delete audit data from the PCL4 Audit Cluster
RPUDELPN
Delete all info for an employee number, including cluster data and infotypes
RPUP1D00
View/Delete records from PCL1 Cluster
RPUP2D00
View/Delete records from PCL2 Cluster
RPUP3D00
View/Delete records from PCL3 Cluster
RPUP4D00
View/Delete records from PCL4 Cluster
you can find more in the link
http://www.sapdevelopment.co.uk/programs/programshr.htm
Regards
Sri

Similar Messages

  • SAP Business One Best-Practice System Setup and Sizing

    <b>SAP Business One Best-Practice System Setup and Sizing</b>
    Get recommendations from SAP and hardware specialists on system setup and sizing
    SAP Business One is a single, affordable, and easy-to-implement solution that integrates the entire business across financials, sales, customers, and operations. With SAP Business One, small businesses can streamline their operations, get instant and complete information, and accelerate profitable growth. SAP Business One is designed for companies with less than 100 employees, less than $75 million in annual revenue, and between 1 and 30 system users, referred to as the SAP Business One sweet spot. The sweet spot covers various industries and micro-verticals which have different requirements when it comes to the use of SAP Business One.
    One of the initial steps during the installation and implementation of SAP Business One is the definition of the system landscape and architecture. Numerous factors affect the system landscape that needs to be created to efficiently run SAP Business One.
    The <a href="http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/BestPractiseSystemSetupand+Sizing">SAP Business One Best-Practice System Setup and Sizing Wiki</a> provides recommendations on how to size and configure the system landscape and architecture for SAP Business One based on best practices.

    For such high volume licenses, you may contact the SAP Local Product Experts.
    You may get their contact info from this site
    [https://websmp209.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001455542004#India]

  • Top 10 SAP Human Capital Management (HCM) Articles of 2010

    These were the Top 10 SAP Human Capital Management (HCM) Articles of 2010 and contain very valuable information for HCM Forum Members.
    /people/jarret.pazahanick/blog/2010/12/02/top-10-sap-human-capital-management-hcm-articles-of-2010

    Ameya Joshi wrote:
    > Hi Mark,
    >
    > Can you please clear these doubts as well
    >
    > Size of extended memory ..........KB . Is this too allocated from Physical+Swap or only Physical or only Swap ?
    extended memory is allocated within the address space of virtual memory, OS manage  each  page of the extended meory whether it should be allocated to physical memory or "swap", you'd think virtual memory is a layer on top of physical memory + swap, rather than "different type of memory"
    >
    > parameter em/initial_size_MB i think only limits the total usage of extended memory by all wp , am i right?
    parmeter for max extended memory is depending on WAS version (incl. OS version)
    e.g. for Linux and windows it's em/max_size_MB
    and also it's limited by OS (sap does have os dependent EM parameters)  and em/blocksize_KB, check the note 835474 please.
    >
    > If yes then this parameter can be increased till amount of physical or physical+swap?
    see my comment above
    Edited by: Denny Liao on May 13, 2010 2:37 PM

  • Top 10 SAP Human Capital Management (HCM) Articles of 2011

    Top 10 SAP Human Capital Management (HCM) Articles of 2011
    Top 10 SAP Human Capital Management (HCM) Articles of 2011
    Great to see 3 articles on Nakisa make the list.

    Hi Dominic,
    a good page to review and bookmark is http://oracle.com/systemrequirements (but it doesn't talk about JavaScript).
    You will need JavaScript for the ADF-based web user interface, but you don't need ActiveX.  Flash Player is needed for the DVT (data visualization) components.   Your browser also needs to accept cookies.
    I am not an expert in HCM, so I don't know if they have functionality that has additional requirements.  A typical example would be ADF Desktop Integration functionality -- if you need that for your product usage, you'd typically need Microsoft Office apps.
    Hope this helps.  Don't hesitate to follow up if you need anything else.
    Oliver
    Fusion Apps Developer Relations
    Follow us at @fadevrel
    http://blogs.oracle.com/fadevrel

  • Best Practice Report development

    Hi All,
    I am working on a blue print for a BI 7.0 project and I am searching for some information regarding a best practice for the development of queries in the three environments within SAP development/quality/production. I was wondering if there is some documentation which SAP explains the best way to use the different environments within SAP. So what are the important things to keep in consideration when building queries.
    So what are the do's and which things are the absolutely dont's?
    Please advise me if you know where  I can find information regarding this topic..
    Thanks in advance!
    Kindest regards,
    Jens

    Hello Jens!
    Just some experiences from me. Maybe they will help.
    - Differ between standard reports and ad hoc reports. Standard reports are build in dev from BW-Team and transported to prod. Ad hoc reports can be build in all systems from bw power users. Standard reports should only be changeable in dev.
    - Dev should only be for developers. Hold testdata in you quality-system so that users can test changes here.
    Best regards,
    Peter

  • Using WebI with SAP BW Data - Best practice for introducing BW Accelerator

    Hi,
    We have a significant investment in using BOE XI 3.1 SP2 integrated to SAP BW 7.0 EHP 1 SPS05.
    Now we intend to introduce BW Accelerator to improve the data fetch performance for the Adhoc (WebI) Analysis and the formatted reports built using WebI (Infoview).
    Data handling in question is approx. 2 Million+ records for each WebI report / adhoc analysis (20 to 30 columns).
    The solution could be BW Cubes --> BW Accelerator --> BW Queries --> BO Universe --> WebI using Infoview
    Does it really help in introducing the BW Accelerator like the case described above ?
    Understand that the BW Accelerator could improve the performance of the underlying data and hence the BW Queries do work faster; but does it really improve (9x to 10x) performance for the MDX Queries generated by the BO Universe ( BOE XI 3.1 SP2 ) & WebI.
    What is the roadmap for the future wrt BW Accelerator and SAP BI BO Integration; if we intend to use WebI ?
    Or should be migrate to BO Explorer as the front end for Adhoc Analysis ?
    Is BO Explorer able to present 1 Million + records with 20-30 columns ?
    What is the best practice / better on performance; as an integrated product / solution ?
    1) BW Cubes --> BW Accelerator --> BW Queries --> SAP Integ Kit --> BO Universe --> WebI
    2) BW Cubes --> BW Accelerator --> ??? --> BO Explorer --> ??? --> WebI ???
    3) BW Cubes --> BW Accelerator --> ??? --> BO Pioneer --> ??? --> WebI ???
    4) BW Cubes --> BW Accelerator --> ??? --> BO Explorer
    5) BW Cubes --> BW Accelerator --> ??? --> BO Pioneer
    6) BW Cubes --> BW Accelerator --> BW Queries --> SAP Integ Kit --> Crystal Reports (to handle above data volume)
    7) BW Multiproviders --> BW Accelerator --> BW Queries --> SAP Web Analyzer (to handle above data volume)
    regards,
    Rajesh K Sarin
    Edited by: Rajesh Sarin on Jan 25, 2010 4:05 PM

    Hi,
    We have a mix of Adhoc Analysis (60 %) and Formatted Reports (40%). We selected WebI as the tool for the purpose & used it for requirements which process approx. 2M records. We faced bottleneck issues on performance (we are on BO XI 3.1 SP2 & SAP BW 7.0 EHP1, SP05).
    We are further analyzing possibility to introduce BWA; if this can handle similar record processing & still preserve our investment on OLAP Universes, WebI, SAP Integration Kit & training users on WebI frontend.
    I see a lot of documentation suggesting "BO Explorer and BWA" - understand that BWA would improve the DB time and BO Explorer would help on the Front-end / OLAP time.
    Request your guidance on the road map & continuation of investment using BWA + WebI.
    regards,
    Rajesh K Sarin

  • SAP PI conceptual best practice for synchronous scenarios

    Hi,
    <br /><br />Apologies for the length of this post but I'm sure this is an area most of you have thought about in your journey with SAP PI.
    <br /><br />We have recently upgraded our SAP PI system from 7.0 to 7.1 and I'd like to document  best practice guidelines for our internal development team to follow.
    I'd be grateful for any feedback related to my thoughts below which may help to consolidate my knowledge to date.
    <br /><br />Prior to the upgrade we have implemented a number of synchronous and asynchronous scenarios using SAP PI as the hub at runtime using the Integration Directory configuration.
    No interfaces to date are exposes directly from our backend systems using transaction SOAMANAGER.
    <br /><br />Our asynchronous scenarios operate through the SAP PI hub at runtime which builds in resilience and harnesses the benefits of the queue-based approach.
    <br /><br />My queries relate to the implementation of synchronous scenarios where there is no mapping or routing requirement.  Perhaps it's best that I outline my experience/thoughts on the 3 options and summarise my queries/concerns that people may be able to advise upon afterwards.
    <br /><br />1) Use SAP PI Integration Directory.  I appreciate going through SAP PI at runtime is not necessary and adds latency to the process but the monitoring capability in transaction SXMB_MONI provide full access for audit purposes and we have implemented alerting running hourly so all process errors are raised and we handle accordingly.  In our SAP PI Production system we have a full record of sync messages recorded while these don't show in the backend system as we don't have propogation turned on.  When we first looked at this, the reduction in speed seemed to be outweighed by the quality of the monitoring/alerting given none of the processes are particularly intensive and don't require instant responses.  We have some inbound interfaces called by two sender systems so we have the overhead of maintaing the Integration Repository/Directory design/configuration twice for these systems but the nice thing is SXMB_MONI shows which system sent the message.  Extra work but seemingly for improved visibility of the process.  I'm not suggesting this is the correct long term approach but states where we are currently.
    <br /><br />2) Use the Advanced Adapter Engine.  I've heard mixed reviews about this functionaslity, there areh obvious improvements in speed by avoiding the ABAP stack on the SAP PI server at runtime, but some people have complained about the lack of SXMB_MONI support.  I don't know if this is still the case as we're at SAP PI 7.1 EHP1 but I plan to test and evaluate once Basis have set up the pre-requisite RFC etc. 
    <br /><br />3) Use the backend system's SOAP runtime and SOAMANAGER.  Using this option I can still model inbound interfaces in SAP PI but expose these using transaction SOAMANAGER in the backend ABAP system.  [I would have tested out the direct P2P connection option but our backend systems are still at Netweaver 7.0 and this option is not supported until 7.1 so that's out for now.]  The clear benefits of exposing the service directly from the backend system is obviously performance which in some of our planned processes would be desirable.  My understanding is that the logging/tracing options in SOAMANAGER have to be switched on while you investigate so there is no automatic recording of interface detail for retrospective review. 
    <br /><br />Queries:
    <br /><br />I have the feeling that there is no clear cut answer to which of the options you select from above but the decision should be based upon the requirements.
    <br /><br />I'm curious to understand SAPs intention with these options  -
    <br /><br />- For synchronous scenarios is it assumed that the client should always handle errors therefore the lack of monitoring should be less of a concern and option 3 desirable when no mapping/routing is required? 
    <br /><br />- Not only does option 3 offer the best performance, but the generated WSDL is ready once built for any further system to implement thereby offering the maximum benefit of SOA, therefore should we always use option 3 whenever possible?
    <br /><br />- Is it intended that the AAE runtime should be used when available but only for asynchronous scenarios or those requiring SAP PI functionality like mapping/routing otherwise customers should use option 3?  I accept there are some areas of functionality not yet supported with the AAE so that would be another factor.
    <br /><br />Thanks for any advice, it is much appreciated.
    <br /><br />Alan
    Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 19, 2010 11:48 AM
    Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 19, 2010 11:50 AM
    Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 20, 2010 12:11 PM

    Hi Aaron,
    I was hoping for a better more concrete answer to my questions.
    I've had discussion with a number of experienced SAP developers and read many articles.
    There is no definitive paper that sets out the best approach here but I have gleaned the following key points:
    - Make interfaces asynchronous whenever possible to reduce system dependencies and improve the user experience (e.g. by eliminating wait times when they are not essential, such as by sending them an email with confirmation details rather than waiting for the server to respond)
    - It is the responsibility of the client to handle errors in synchronous scenarios hence monitoring lost through P-P services compared to the details information in transaction SXMB_MONI for PI services is not such a big issue.  You can always turn on monitoring in SOAMANAGER to trace errors if need be.
    - Choice of integration technique varies considerably by release level (for PI and Netweaver) so system landscape will be a significant factor.  For example, we have some systems on Netweaver 7.0 and other on 7.1.  As you need 7.1 for direction connection PI services we'd rather wait until all systems are at the higher level than have mixed usage in our landscape - it is already complex enough.
    - We've not tried the AAE option in a Production scenarios yet but this is only really important for high volume interfaces, something that is not a concern at the moment.  Obviously cumulative performance may be an issue in time so we plan to start looking at AAE soon.
    Hope these comments may be useful.
    Alan

  • SAP HCM Implementation: Best Practice for configuring

    Hi,
    This is my first independent project of HCM implementation. I have just started the system configuration. Done with setting up the PA, PSA, EG and ESG. Assigned to CC.  At this stage, I have a very basic question which is, what is the best practice for the next steps of configuration. What do I go to next, step up the OM in the SAP EasyAccess Menu? How should I go from here?
    Would really appreciate some explanatory assistance.
    Thanks in advance.
    Papri
    Edited by: papri_rc on Jul 8, 2011 6:40 AM

    Its all depends on business requirement
    at starting as i advised you review your BBP , make sure you configure everything
    for your reference iam giving the following data for OM and PA config..
    as part of OM
    1.     depict client org structure using simple maintenance , with this you can create large structures in less time(while doing org structure be careful and refer BBP)
    2.     maintain integration switches
    3.     maintain plan version
    4.     maintain number ranges
    Configuration for PA
    HR Enterprise /PersonnelStructure     
    u2022     Personnel Areas     
    u2022     Personnel Sub Areas     
    u2022     Employee Group     
    u2022     Employee Sub Group     
    u2022     Assignment of Personnel Area to Company Code     
    u2022     Assignment of Employee Sub Group to Employee Group     
    Basic Settings
    1.     Maintain Number Range Intervals for Personnel Numbers     
    2.     Determine defaults for number ranges     
    Personal Data     
    1.     Create Forms of Address     
    2.     Create Marital Status     
    Family     
    1.     Defined Possible Family Members     
    Addresses
    1.     Create Address Type     
    Communication     
    1.     Create Communication Types     
    Contractual and Corporate Agreements
    1.     Define Contract Types     
    2.     Determine periods of notice     
    Employee Qualifications
    1.     Create education establishment types     
    2.     Define Education Training     
    3.     Create educational Certificates     
    4.     Create branches of study     
    5.     Determine permissible certificates for education type     
    Infotype Menus     
    1.     User Group Dependency on Menus and Info groups     
    2.     Infotype Menu     
    3.     Determine choice of Infotype menus     
    4.     Infotype Menus     
    Actions     
    1.     User Group Dependency on Menus and Infogroups     
    2.     Info Group     
    3.     Personnel Action Types     
    4.     Create reasons for personnel actions     
    5.     Change Action Menu     
    *Developments(ABAPconsultant will do)     *Field Enhancements     (any field enhancements in infotypes)
    Customer Infotypes     -Develop any customer infotypes if required for the business from 9000 series
    Edited by: Piscian . on Jul 8, 2011 9:08 AM

  • Modifying SAP standard roles - best practice

    Hi,
    Is there a Best practice How-to guide for configuring SAP BPs roles for client use.  I know I shouldn't change the content delivered by SAP but I'm not quite sure what I should delta link copy into client namespace.
    I am implementing MSS.  Do I just delta link copy the Manager role into client namespace or I should make a delta link copy of the My Staff workset then make changes to the workset and assign it to a completely new ClientManager role?
    I have the TransportEP6Content how to guide but it doesn't say explicitly what is best parctice.  This doc references 'HowTo Use Business Packages in Enterprise Portal 6.0' but it isn't where it says it is on service marketplace.
    TIA,
    J

    Hi,
      'How to use Busiess Packages in Enterprise Portal 6.0' is available in this link.
    http://help.sap.com/bp_epv260/EP_EN/documentation/How-to_Guides/misc/Using_Business_Packages.pdf
    Check out for the best practices.
    Regards,
    Harini S

  • Best Practices - reports

    I am looking for advice on best practices for reporting. Test runs generate alot of data and I am not always sure what the best things to report on are.
    In particular I am comparing a number of different code releases over the last few weeks, is page response time the only thing, or most important thing to report on?

    Sorry for the not very detailed reply. You were on the right track though.
    The page response times are an important metric as they, along with error rates, indicated the end user experience. Therefore, I would recommend that any comparison of test runs begin with an analysis of the average response times under load and the transaction failure rate under load. Using e-Load, you could build these graphs as response times/transactions failed and virtual users on a time axis, or use Users as the scale.
    But, in my experience the end user experience is only the beginning of the story, with the impact on the underlying infrastructure telling the other side. As you have already worked out, if the response times at a given level of users are the same the first instinct is to say the new code is as successful. But the CPUs of the application servers might now be at 80% utilization where before they were 50%. So while the end user would see no difference your overall capacity will have dropped. The same could go for other metrics like bandwidth if more or larger images were added to the application, etc.
    System level metrics then like KB/sec, hits per second and pages per second should also be included in the comparison. And these are already available in e-Load. Serverstats can collect the rest of the data for you in most cases.
    At minimum, I would look at CPU on the Web Servers. CPU, memory, requests per second and requests queued on the application servers. And CPU, connections and disk usage on databases. This will be a good start .
    CMason
    Senior Consultant - eLoadExpert
    Empirix

  • RICEFW Best Practices - Reports

    What are some of the best practices to keep in mind when designing any custom report in ECC?  I guess it would also help to have an idea of the capabilities and functionality to know what features I can leverage when writing my functional design.

    when ever you design a report you need to take care of some basic things, like it should fullfill basic necessasity and if you can add additional informations which can be used by other persons also.
    it shuld cover at least 2 process / requirements.
    its appearece should be good.
    Selection criteria shuld be easy and user friendly.
    Try to use includes which makes program faster.

  • Need SAP Plant Maintenance Best Practice

    Hi All,
    Kindly tell me any link for SAP Best Practice for Plant Maintenance.Kindly reply me urgent.
    I shall be very great full to you.
    Regards,
    abapfk
    Edited by: abapfk on Sep 27, 2011 10:38 AM

    [http://help.sap.com/bp_chem603/BBLibrary/HTML/860_EN_IN.htm]
    [http://help.sap.com/bp_chem603/BBLibrary/HTML/861_EN_IN.htm]
    [http://help.sap.com/bp_bm604/BBLibrary/HTML/862_EN_US.htm]

  • SAP HANA Security - Best Practice for Access to Schemas??

    Hi,
    Currently we don'y have a defined Security model in HANA Studio.Neither there is no defined duties of a BASIS / Security / Developers.
    I want to understand what best practices are followed at other customers for defining security for Schema.
    1. Who should be creating the schema for Developers / Modelers?
    2. Should we use our own ID's to create/maintain these Schema or a Generic ID?
    Right now, when developers log in to Studio, by default they are assigned to their own schema (User ID) and they create objects under that.
    We(Security team), face issues when other developers need access to schema of another user as they want to develop objects under schema of different user
    Also, who should be owning the "SYSTEM" user ID and what steps needs to be done whenever a new schema is created.
    Thanks for the help in advance.

    Hi,
    I created a project (JDeveloper) with local xsd-files and tried to delete and recreate them in the structure pane with references to a version on the application server. After reopening the project I deployed it successfully to the bpel server. The process is working fine, but in the structure pane there is no information about any of the xsds anymore and the payload in the variables there is an exception (problem building schema).
    How does bpel know where to look for the xsd-files and how does the mapping still work?
    This cannot be the way to do it correctly. Do I have a chance to rework an existing project or do I have to rebuild it from scratch in order to have all the references right?
    Thanks for any clue.
    Bette

  • Help required - Manufacturing KPI's( Best Practice Reporting )

    Hi,
    I am looking for examples, screenshots, reports, dashboards of manufacturing KPI's    using SAP BI or Business Object.
    Could you please let me know where can I get more information about this. can somebody send me some useful information about this.
    point will be assigned to helpful answers.

    Hi,
    1.) Go to this web page:
    http://help.sap.com/bp_biv170/index.htm
    2.) Click on the "pre-configured scenarios" link at the bottom of the paragraph.
    3.) Choose Manufacturing Analysis (or any of the other items for that matter).
    4.) Read the scenario documentation.
    This will tell you how to install the manufacturing objects and, if you look at the Scenario Overview, will tell you about the Scenario and what it's trying to achieve (e.g., what questions the standard is aiming at solving).
    Brian

  • Re: SAP Business One Best-Practice System Setup and Sizing

    Hi,
    I am having very good knowledge in R/3, I want to gain knowledge about business one. So I want to install business one in my laptop and what is the hardware requirement for that? Do you know anybody in Pune, India who can install it for me?
    Regards,
    Guru

    Hi guru,
    Sap R/3 and Sap B1 both are different. small example for sap r/3 and sap b1 is windows os is r/3 and ms office is sap b1.
    if u want sap b1 in ur laptop. we need two softwares 1 is sql server and 2 is sap b1. If u have two softwares with in 2h u have sap b1 in ur system.
    Deva

Maybe you are looking for