Troubles editing tables with partitions

I'm running SQL Developer 1.5.3 against Oracle 10/11 databases and SQL Developer has trouble with my partitioned tables. Both the schema owner and sys users experience the same problems.
The first time I try to edit a table, I get an "Error Loading Objects" dialog with a NullPointException message. If I immediately turn around and try to edit the table again, I get the Edit Table dialog. That's annoying but there's at least a work-around.
Next, if I select the Indexes pane, I can view the first index but selecting another one results in an "Index Error on <table>" error dialog. The message is "There are no table partitions on which to define local index partitions". At this point, selecting any of the other panes (Columns, Primary Key, etc.) results in the same dialog. While the main Partitions tab shows my partitions, I cannot see them in the Edit Table dialog. In fact, the Partition Definitions and Subpartition Templates panes are blank.
Does anyone else see this behavior? Version 1.5.1 behaved the same way so it's not new.
Of course I've figured out how to do everything I need through SQL but it would be handy if I could just use the tool.
Thank you.

Most of my tables are generated from a script so this morning I decided to just create a very basic partitioned table. It contained a NUMBER primary key and a TIMESTAMP(6) column to use with partitioning. That table worked just fine in SQL Developer.
At that point I tried to figure out what is different about my tables and I finally found the difference... Oracle Spatial. If I add an MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY column to my partitioned table, SQL Developer starts having issues.
I also have the GeoRaptor plugin installed so I had to wonder if it was interfering with SQL Developer. I couldn't find an option to uninstall an extension so I went into the sqldeveloper/extensions directory and removed GeoRaptorLibs and org.GeoRaptor.jar. GeoRaptor doesn't appear to be installed in SQL Developer anymore but I still see the same behavior.
It appears that there is an issue in SQL Developer with Oracle Spatial and partitioning. Can someone confirm this?

Similar Messages

Is it possible to create table with partition in compress mode

Hi All,
I want to create a table in compress option, with partitions. When i create with partitions the compression isnt enabled, but with noramal table creation the compression option is enables.
My question is:
cant we create a table with partition/subpartition in compress mode..? Please help.
Below is the code that i have used for table creation.
CREATE TABLE temp
TRADE_ID                    NUMBER,
SRC_SYSTEM_ID               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
SRC_TRADE_ID                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
SRC_TRADE_VERSION           VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
ORIG_SRC_SYSTEM_ID          VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
TRADE_STATUS                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
TRADE_TYPE                  VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
SECURITY_TYPE               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
VOLUME                      NUMBER,
ENTRY_DATE                  DATE,
    REASON                      VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
TABLESPACE data
PCTUSED    0
PCTFREE    10
INITRANS   1
MAXTRANS   255
NOLOGGING
COMPRESS
NOCACHE
PARALLEL (DEGREE 6 INSTANCES 1)
MONITORING
PARTITION BY RANGE (TRADE_DATE)
SUBPARTITION BY LIST (SRC_SYSTEM_ID)
SUBPARTITION TEMPLATE
(SUBPARTITION SALES VALUES ('sales'),
   SUBPARTITION MAG VALUES ('MAG'),
   SUBPARTITION SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA'),
   SUBPARTITION FIS VALUES ('FIS'),
   SUBPARTITION GD VALUES ('GS'),
   SUBPARTITION ST VALUES ('ST'),
   SUBPARTITION KOR VALUES ('KOR'),
   SUBPARTITION BLR VALUES ('BLR'),
   SUBPARTITION SUT VALUES ('SUT'),
   SUBPARTITION RM VALUES ('RM'),
   SUBPARTITION DEFAULT VALUES (default)
PARTITION RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
    LOGGING
        TABLESPACE data
     ( SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SALES VALUES ('SALES')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_MAG VALUES ('MAG')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_FIS VALUES ('FIS')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_GS VALUES ('GS')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_ST VALUES ('ST')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_KOR VALUES ('KOR')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_BLR VALUES ('BLR')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SUT VALUES ('SUT')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_RM VALUES ('RM')      TABLESPACE data,
    SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_DEFAULT VALUES (default)      TABLESPACE data)); Edited by: user11942774 on 8 Dec, 2011 5:17 AM

user11942774 wrote:
I want to create a table in compress option, with partitions. When i create with partitions the compression isnt enabled, but with noramal table creation the compression option is enables. First of all your CREATE TABLE statement is full of syntax errors. Next time test it before posting - we don't want to spend time on fixing things not related to your question.
Now, I bet you check COMPRESSION value of partitioned table same way you do it for a non-partitioned table - in USER_TABLES - and therefore get wrong results. Since compreesion can be enabled on individual partition level you need to check COMPRESSION in USER_TAB_PARTITIONS:
SQL> CREATE TABLE temp
2 (
3    TRADE_ID                    NUMBER,
4    SRC_SYSTEM_ID               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
5    SRC_TRADE_ID                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
6    SRC_TRADE_VERSION           VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
7    ORIG_SRC_SYSTEM_ID          VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
8    TRADE_STATUS                VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
9    TRADE_TYPE                  VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
10    SECURITY_TYPE               VARCHAR2(60 BYTE),
11    VOLUME                      NUMBER,
12    ENTRY_DATE                  DATE,
13      REASON                      VARCHAR2(255 BYTE),
14    TRADE_DATE                  DATE
15 )
16 TABLESPACE users
17 PCTUSED    0
18 PCTFREE    10
19 INITRANS   1
20 MAXTRANS   255
21 NOLOGGING
22 COMPRESS
23 NOCACHE
24 PARALLEL (DEGREE 6 INSTANCES 1)
25 MONITORING
26 PARTITION BY RANGE (TRADE_DATE)
27 SUBPARTITION BY LIST (SRC_SYSTEM_ID)
28 SUBPARTITION TEMPLATE
29    (SUBPARTITION SALES VALUES ('sales'),
30     SUBPARTITION MAG VALUES ('MAG'),
31     SUBPARTITION SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA'),
32     SUBPARTITION FIS VALUES ('FIS'),
33     SUBPARTITION GD VALUES ('GS'),
34     SUBPARTITION ST VALUES ('ST'),
35     SUBPARTITION KOR VALUES ('KOR'),
36     SUBPARTITION BLR VALUES ('BLR'),
37     SUBPARTITION SUT VALUES ('SUT'),
38     SUBPARTITION RM VALUES ('RM'),
39     SUBPARTITION DEFAULT_SUB VALUES (default)
40    )
41 (
42   PARTITION RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX VALUES LESS THAN (MAXVALUE)
43      LOGGING
44          TABLESPACE users
45       ( SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SALES VALUES ('SALES')      TABLESPACE users,
46      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_MAG VALUES ('MAG')      TABLESPACE users,
47      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SPI VALUES ('SPI', 'SPIM', 'SPIIA')      TABLESPACE users,
48      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_FIS VALUES ('FIS')      TABLESPACE users,
49      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_GS VALUES ('GS')      TABLESPACE users,
50      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_ST VALUES ('ST')      TABLESPACE users,
51      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_KOR VALUES ('KOR')      TABLESPACE users,
52      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_BLR VALUES ('BLR')      TABLESPACE users,
53      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_SUT VALUES ('SUT')      TABLESPACE users,
54      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_RM VALUES ('RM')      TABLESPACE users,
55      SUBPARTITION TS_MAX_DEFAULT VALUES (default)      TABLESPACE users));
Table created.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> SELECT PARTITION_NAME,
2          COMPRESSION
3    FROM USER_TAB_PARTITIONS
4    WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TEMP'
5 /
PARTITION_NAME                 COMPRESS
RMS_TRADE_DLY_MAX              ENABLED
SQL> SELECT COMPRESSION
2    FROM USER_TABLES
3    WHERE TABLE_NAME = 'TEMP'
4 /
COMPRESS
SQL> SY.

ORA-00604 ORA-00904 When query partitioned table with partitioned indexes

Got ORA-00604 ORA-00904 When query partitioned table with partitioned indexes in the data warehouse environment.
Query runs fine when query the partitioned table without partitioned indexes.
Here is the query.
SELECT al2.vdc_name, al7.model_series_name, COUNT (DISTINCT (al1.vin)),
al27.accessory_code
FROM vlc.veh_vdc_accessorization_fact al1,
vlc.vdc_dim al2,
vlc.model_attribute_dim al7,
vlc.ppo_list_dim al18,
vlc.ppo_list_indiv_type_dim al23,
vlc.accy_type_dim al27
WHERE ( al2.vdc_id = al1.vdc_location_id
AND al7.model_attribute_id = al1.model_attribute_id
AND al18.mydppolist_id = al1.ppo_list_id
AND al23.mydppolist_id = al18.mydppolist_id
AND al23.mydaccytyp_id = al27.mydaccytyp_id
AND ( al7.model_series_name IN ('SCION TC', 'SCION XA', 'SCION XB')
AND al2.vdc_name IN
('PORT OF BALTIMORE',
'PORT OF JACKSONVILLE - LEXUS',
'PORT OF LONG BEACH',
'PORT OF NEWARK',
'PORT OF PORTLAND'
AND al27.accessory_code IN ('42', '43', '44', '45')
GROUP BY al2.vdc_name, al7.model_series_name, al27.accessory_code

I would recommend that you post this at the following OTN forum:
Database - General
General Database Discussions
and perhaps at:
Oracle Warehouse Builder
Warehouse Builder
The Oracle OLAP forum typically does not cover general data warehousing topics.

How to create editable table with one empty row ?

I'm looking for solution how to create editable table with one empty row using ADF BC. I have seen this solution in application that was created in JHeadstart and it's very well idea to use it insead of creation form.

hammm, i do it this:
drop the VO on the page, select Table->ADF Table....
so, drop the botton create, from de VO->operations->create (the firts), and right botton (mouse) Edit binding....
in Data collection select the VO, in Select an action select CreateInsert
luck

Editable table with multiple rows

Hi All!
We're trying to develop some application in VC 7.0. That application should read data from some R/3 tables (via standard and custom functional modules), then display data to user and allow him/her to modify it (or add some data into table rows), and then save it back to R/3.
What is the best way to do that?
There's no problem with displaying data.
But when I try to add something to table (on portal interface), I'm able to use only first row of the table... Even if I fill all fields of that row, I'm not able to add data to second row, etc.
Second question. Is it possible to display in one table contents of output of several BAPIs? For example we have three bapis, one displaying user, second displays that user's subordinates, and the third one - that user's manager. And we want one resulting table...
And last. What is the best way to submit data from table view in VC (portal) to R/3 table? I understand that we should write some functional module, that puts data to R/3. I'm asking about what should be done in VC itself. Some button, or action...
Any help will be appreciated and rewarded :o)
Regards,
DK

Here are some former postings:
Editable table with multiple rows
and
Editable table with multiple rows
Are you on the right SP-level?
Can you also split up your posting: one question, one posting? This way you get faster answers, as people might just browse the headers.

JDeveloper, Table with Partitions

Hi,
iḿ designing a database with JDeveloper 11, but in the table object does not appear the partitioning option as manual shows.
(I'm following the example in the help.)
What's the problem ?
cheers
campos

campos,
Try checking the "advanced" checkbox in the edit table dialog (Frank - FYI it's in the "edit a offline database table"). This should make the partitioning option visible (note, tested on 11.1.1.3)
John

Where's the metadata for STORE IN clause of a table with partition?

Hi Experts,
I created a table with a range-interval partition with STORE IN clause. It's definition:
CREATE TABLE interval_part (
person_id NUMBER(5) NOT NULL,
first_name VARCHAR2(30),
last_name VARCHAR2(30))
PARTITION BY RANGE (person_id)
INTERVAL (100) STORE IN (TSP_1, TSP_2, TSP_3) (
PARTITION p1 VALUES LESS THAN (101))
TABLESPACE TSP_1;
I can not find the metadata for STORE IN clause in ALL_TAB_PARTITIONS, ALL_TABLES. Where is the metadata for the STORE IN clause? How can I find the tablespace list (TSP_1, TSP_2, TSP_3)?
Thanks,
David

DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL returns the definition of the table. But I just need the value of the tablespace list, for example, TSP_1, TSP_2, TSP_3. Is there any view which stored the value?
Thanks,
David

Cannot edit Table with TableModel

Hallo !
If I add a table, I can edit the cells with a doubleclick,
but if I bind the table to a TableModel it is not possible to edit the cells.
Why ?
Please help me. Thx. Wolfgang

The default TableMode isCellEditable (int row, int column)
returns false. You need to extend this to return true if any of the cells are editable.

Trouble editing Tables.

I'm using a JButton and JTextFields to edit empty cells in a table. This is my setValueAt method.
class QuickModel extends AbstractTableModel {
public void setValueAt(Object aValue, int row, int col){
     courses[row][col] = aValue;
I'm using the code:
          QuickModel.setValueAt(d, rowcount, colcount);
in my actionPreformed method. It's giving me the compile error:
C:\java\Lab5\L532JMus.java:71: non-static method setValueAt(java.lang.Object,int,int) cannot be referenced from a static context
          QuickModel.setValueAt(d, rowcount, colcount);
My main class is static. Would that have anything to do with it? If so, how do I fix it?

Tables always exist inside a text frame. Even if it looks like a stand alone table, it's within a kissfit frame.
In order to edit a table, you have to check out its parent frame first.
Click inside one of the table cells. Look at the assignments panel, where all the editable stories (text frames) are listed. Is one highlighted? That will be the frame that the table belongs to. Click the Check Out button at the bottom to check out the selected story, or use any method you like to check it out.
If you can select text inside a table but there is no story highlighted in the Assignments panel, then the designer forgot to export that text frame to InCopy format. It's read-only and uneditable by you in InCopy. Ask them to export the text frame. Then you can File > Update Design (or just close and open the file) in InCopy and you'll be able to check it out and edit it.
AM
incopysecrets.com

Possible to alter table with partitions to also have subpartitions online?

The subject says it all....
Is it possible to add hash sub-partitioning to an existing range partitioned table 'in-the-fly', or will it be necessary to create the new table structure first and reload the data?

You have to create a new table first.

Insert performance issue with Partitioned Table.....

Hi All,
I have a performance issue during with a table which is partitioned. without table being partitioned
it ran in less time but after partition it took more than double.
1) The table was created initially without any partition and the below insert took only 27 minuts.
Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:27:35.20
2) Now I re-created the table with partition(range yearly - below) and the same insert took 59 minuts.
Is there anyway i can achive the better performance during insert on this partitioned table?
[ similerly, I have another table with 50 Million records and the insert took 10 hrs without partition.
with partitioning the table, it took 18 hours... ]
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 4195045590
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 643K| 34M| | 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 643K| 34M| 2112K| 12917 (3)| 00:02:36 |
| 2 | VIEW | index$_join$_001 | 69534 | 1290K| | 529 (3)| 00:00:07 |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | | | | | |
| 4 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| PK_ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE | 69534 | 1290K| | 181 (3)| 00:00
| 5 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| ACCOUNT_MASTER_BASE_IDX2 | 69534 | 1290K| | 474 (2)| 00:00
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TB_SISADMIN_BALANCE | 2424K| 87M| | 6413 (4)| 00:01:17 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
1 - access("A"."VENDOR_ACCT_NBR"=SUBSTR("B"."ACCOUNT_NO",1,8) AND
"A"."VENDOR_CD"="B"."COMPANY_NO")
3 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
Open C1;
Loop
Fetch C1 Bulk Collect Into C_Rectype Limit 10000;
Forall I In 1..C_Rectype.Count
Insert test
     col1,col2,col3)
Values
     val1, val2,val3);
V_Rec := V_Rec + Nvl(C_Rectype.Count,0);
Commit;
Exit When C_Rectype.Count = 0;
C_Rectype.delete;
End Loop;
End;
Total Rec Inserted :- 2424233
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:51:01.22
Edited by: user520824 on Jul 16, 2010 9:16 AM

I'm concerned about the view in step 2 and the index join in step 3. A composite index with both columns might eliminate the index join and result in fewer read operations.
If you know which partition the data is going into beforehand you can save a little bit of processing by specifying the partition (which may not be a scalable long-term solution) in the insert - I'm not 100% sure you can do this on inserts but I know you can on selects.
The APPEND hint won't help the way you are using it - the VALUES clause in an insert makes it be ignored. Where it is effective and should help you is if you can do the insert in one query - insert into/select from. If you are using the loop to avoid filling up undo/rollback you can use a bulk collect to batch the selects and commit accordingly - but don't commit more often than you have to because more frequent commits slow transactions down.
I don't think there is a nologging hint :)
So, try something like
insert /*+ hints */ into ...
Select
     A.Ing_Acct_Nbr, currency_Symbol,
     Balance_Date,     Company_No,
     Substr(Account_No,1,8) Account_No,
     Substr(Account_No,9,1) Typ_Cd ,
     Substr(Account_No,10,1) Chk_Cd,
     Td_Balance,     Sd_Balance,
     Sysdate,     'Sisadmin'
From Ideaal_Cons.Tb_Account_Master_Base A,
     Ideaal_Staging.Tb_Sisadmin_Balance B
Where A.Vendor_Acct_Nbr = Substr(B.Account_No,1,8)
   And A.Vendor_Cd = b.company_no
      ;Edited by: riedelme on Jul 16, 2010 7:42 AM

Will there performance improvement over separate tables vs single table with multiple partitions?

Will there performance improvement over separate tables vs single table with multiple partitions? Is advisable to have separate tables than having a single big table with partitions? Can we expect same performance having single big table with partitions? What is the recommendation approach in HANA?

Suren,
first off a friendly reminder: SCN is a public forum and for you as an SAP employee there are multiple internal forums/communities/JAM groups available. You may want to consider this.
Concerning your question:
You didn't tell us what you want to do with your table or your set of tables.
As tables are not only storage units but usually bear semantics - read: if data is stored in one table it means something else than the same data in a different table - partitioned tables cannot simply be substituted by multiple tables.
Looked at it on a storage technology level, table partitions are practically the same as tables. Each partition has got its own delta store & can be loaded and displaced to/from memory independent from the others.
Generally speaking there shouldn't be too many performance differences between a partitioned table and multiple tables.
However, when dealing with partitioned tables, the additional step of determining the partition to work on is always required. If computing the result of the partitioning function takes a major share in your total runtime (which is unlikely) then partitioned tables could have a negative performance impact.
Having said this: as with all performance related questions, to get a conclusive answer you need to measure the times required for both alternatives.
- Lars

Inserting Rows in an Editable Table

Application Focus: JSF with ADF/BC.
watching Steve Muench´s Screencast on "Creating an Editable Table with a Dropdown List in Each Row" i was inspired to add a functionality to add rows.
Lets say i have an Employee and Departments table. If i want to add three new employees in the employee editable table - that wont work - it seems that adding rows aint that simple, cause it seems not possible to commit more than one row at a time
what i did according to forum posts and how-to´s:
1. dropped "insert" from data control palette
2. altered binding to from create to "CreateInsert"
works ok, but if i press the button twice (3x, 4x) the new rows are shown, but if i commit them, only one is in the database?
Any tips on that would be appreciated.

I'm trying to a similar thing, create an input screen that allows you to add muliple rows at the same time some rows having a drop down list. I've read the following How to which lets me edit multiple rows but if I add a create button or a CreateInsert button it doesnt seem to give me rows to create.
How To Create Multi Row Edit Forms in a JSP Page with Oracle JDeveloper 10g
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/tips/mills/JSP_Multi_Row_Edits.html

Using the enter key on an editable table

Hi,
I'm using 11g adf and I can't figure out how to get past this:
When going through an editable table (with editingMode="editAll") using the enter key, it will stop after a certain number of rows, equal to the value of fetchSize. If I want to go down further, I have to scroll down another way to make it fetch the next set of rows, it won't go to the next row with the enter key. It simply won't execute the query to fetch the next rows.
Increasing the fetchSize will just delay the problem to a row further down (and decrease the performance since the fetch operation can take quite a bit longer).
I've tried to put a clientListener on both the table or the inputText fields to intercept the enter key, but that won't work when the table is in editable mode.
Is there any way to fix this problem?

Hi,
I've tried to put a clientListener on both the table or the inputText fields to intercept the enter key, but that won't work when the table is in editable mode.
The clientListener needs to be on the inputText fields. Then in JS you need to call a server listener which will check if the current row is already at the range end and if calls NextSet (you can provide this as a method binding). Unfortunately after this you will need to PPR the table to show the new rows. This is how I would try it.
Frank

ADF editable table issue

Hi, I drag and drop an expert mode updatable VO to create an ADF editable table with inputText components associated with the table columns. This table is also binded to a CoreTable object inside the backing bean of the page. I also have a "Save" button which has actionLister binded to the backing bean to handle the saving for user's input data.
Basically, I have 2 rows and 2 columns for the editable table. I entered "ABC" for the first row and first column and entered "DEF" for the second row and first column like the following:
| Column 1 | Column 2 |
| ABC | |
| DEF | |
In the backing bean's saveChanges method, I do:
public void saveChanges(ActionEvent actionEvent) {
int rowCount = this.testCaseTable.getRowCount();
for (int i=0; i<rowCount; i++) {
JUCtrlValueBindingRef rowDef = (JUCtrlValueBindingRef)this.testCaseTable.getRowData(i);
TestCaseRowImpl row = (TestCaseRowImpl )rowDef.getRow();
System.out.println("Column1 Data: "+row.getColumn1());
System.out.println("Column2 Data: "+row.getColumn2());
I am expecting to get "ABC" for the first row column1 data and "DEF" for the second row column1 data. However, the actual result is both "DEF" (the last entered value) for both the first and second row column1 data.
What can be the potential issues of my codes? How can I get the correct user input data?
Thanks.

Hi
You can obtain this data from iterator:
DCBindingContainer bc = getBindings()
DCIteratorBinding iter = bc.get("YourIteratorNameIterator");
while(iter.hasNext()){
Row row = iter.next()
System.out.println("Column1 Data: "+row.getAttribute("Column1"));
System.out.println("Column2 Data: "+row.getColumn2("Column2"));
Kuba

Troubles editing tables with partitions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for