!!URGENT!! Skype traffic bypassing Proxy and going...

Hi Team,
We are running Websense WCG/Microsoft ISA  proxy in our environmenet , Suddently few days back Skype is stop working for both ISA and Websense users and during the troubleshooting I have observed Skype is not taking proxy settings and sending traffic directly to Firewall and being blocked due to no rules for random Destination IP address and port.
Can you please let me know the fix for this issue i have read so many blogs and form but can't get any working solution.
I have already done changes on Websense to tunnel skype but it's not working and also i have make the changes on skype file %appdata% shared.xml to block the UNpN ports <disableUNpN>1</disableUNpN>.
Please let me know what changes we need to perform on Skype regestry or any files to use it as proxy

Hi and welcome to the Skype Community,
Please start by checking Skype Options ->Advanced -> Connection and confirm the proxy settings are still correct.
If that doesn't help: Were there any updates to Skype clients installed recently? Can you share which Skype client version is in use in your network?
Follow the latest Skype Community News
↓ Did my reply answer your question? Accept it as a solution to help others, Thanks. ↓

Similar Messages

  • Need to find out the traffic coming into and going out of ALSB

    Hello,
    I would like to know if there is a way to find out the traffic coming into and going out of ALSB (Number of Messages). Please let me know if i am not clear.
    Thanks,
    Varun

    I would like to know if there is a way to find out the traffic coming into and going out of ALSB (Number of Messages). Please let me know if i am not clear.There are two points. If you want to get aggregate traffic for all end-points in OSB, then out of box is not possible.It can be arrived at using monitoring capabilities.
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/operations/monitoring.html
    If you are looking at the traffic at end-point level, then it is available when monitoring is enabled.
    Cheer
    Manoj

  • Capture http traffic between server and proxy

    Hi,
    I am not a solaris admin so I need some help to capture http traffic between proxy and server.
    I used 'snoop port 80' on my proxy server but this command gives me the traffic between client and proxy.
    PS: i do not have access to remote server.
    Thanks
    Linda

    You probably need this instead:
    snoop host server
    where server is the hostname of the server that you are trying to connect to.
    If you have multiple interfaces, you have to be sure you are snooping on the right interface.

  • Strange info in "Bypass Proxy Settings for These Hosts and Domains"

    For my Mac Mini my Network IP Address always has a self-assigned 169.254 number that I cannot change. Strangely, this same IP number is similar to info that is in the Proxies section (of Network Settings) under "Bypass Proxy Settings for These Hosts and Domains".
    No matter what I do, this info (*,local, 169.254/16) appears in my Network Settings in the Proxies section under "Bypass Proxy Settings for These Hosts and Domains". (I tried removing the info and it would cause the "Configure Proxies" selection to default to "Always Use PAC File". Had to go back and retrash all the plist files to have Proxies go back to "Configure Proxies-Manually". Still, the info (*,local, 169.254/16) continues to appear in the "Bypass Proxy Settings for These Hosts and Domains" section and my IP address is always a 169.254 number.)
    Comcast cable modem via direct hardwired Ethernet works fine with my other computer, so not the modem. Also, other computer does not have any info in the "Bypass Proxy Settings for These Hosts and Domains" section.
    Installed a fresh copy of OS X 11.5 on a new hard drive. Still the same problem.
    I posted this issue before but only got one responder and the problem still exists. Any clues? Somebody must know about this stuff. Help please.
    Thanks

    When your Mac wakes up, it does not yet have an IP Addresss. It wants to send a request to a Router for an apprpriste IP address to use now. But it needs to have an IP address (like a return address) to receive any messages. So, ... wait for it,
    ... it (your Mac) makes one up. There are rules that ensure it is a random address, but they always start with 169.254. It is on the same subnet with any low-order 16 bits This is the "self-assigned" range of IP Addresses. This address is only good for talking on a local network segment, for things like asking for a valid IP Address from a DHCP-enabled Router.
    In most cases, on most networks, the 169.254 self-assigned IP Address is replaced by a valid Local IP Address such as 192.168.xxx yyy or 10.0.xxx.yyy so quickly that you never even see the 169.254 Address.
    If you do see the 169.254 Address, it can be read as "Nobody will talk to me" or "Nobody will give me an IP Address". When you have this IP Address for more than an instant, you should suspect bad cables for Ethernet connections, bad signal strength or interference for wireless, Router configuration problems, or Mac configuration problems.
    Mac configuration problems are often solved by using the "Assist Me" button is System Preferences > Network  and choosing to set up again.
    Another diagnostic is to try using Network Utility and the Ping function, and Ping-ing the address of your Airport base Station, often 192.168.0.1 or 10.0.0.1 or similar. This will tell you if the Router is reachable, or there are cabling/wirelss signal problems.
    In this case, proxies are not an issue, and are simply a distraction from the real problems.

  • How to know whether bypass proxy for local address is enabled in browser

    Can anyone help me in finding out whether the check box "bypass proxy server for local address" in Internet explorer (Tools->Internet options->Connections->LAN Settings) is enabled from java plug in.
    In my applet application if that checkbox is enabled then i have to throw a message saying that the checkbox is enabled.
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards
    Vijay

    We have been in discussions with Microsoft over the last few days on this issue - which is seen with Outlook 2007 versions onwards.  Extract from resolution communication from Microsoft:
    The issue you have raised is known as it has been reported and when you have a proxy set in Internet Explorer and “Bypass proxy settings for local addresses”, Outlook will attempt to connect to Office 365 directly – like the bypass rule would apply.
    Because the direct connection is blocked in the Firewall, Outlook needs to have the connections going in Timeout before attempting to connect using the Proxy.
    Your network trace proves the issue.
    Microsoft have scheduled a fix for Outlook 2010 in February 2014 cumulative update. A fix for Outlook 2013 will also follow, but Outlook 2007 will not be addressed because it is in Extended Support.
    There are two possible workarounds for this behaviour:
    First, and I wouldn’t recommend it, is to allow Direct traffic through the Firewall to Office 365.
    The advantage of this approach is that it will be done centralized and it will impact everyone immediately.
    Information about the O365 IP addresses
    There are two downsides to this behaviour:
    1.  First you need to maintain the Firewall exceptions as IP from O365 server can change without notice
    2.  Second, winhttp traffic may go through both proxy and direct and this can cause unforeseen behaviour.
    The second approach is to use a proxy pac instead of manually setting in the proxy and the exceptions.
    The advantage is that you will have centralized method to control how winhttp traffic goes and the issue will not be experienced anymore.
    If a single pac does not be fit, you can configure proxy pac files for each site requirements and use an IIS server to store it.

  • Bypass Proxy for Local Addresses - Office 365 connection/ Outlook 2010

    This is a strange one.  Connectivity to Office 365 within our netwotk works fine although very slow for outlook 2010 client to initially connect. Once connected, it works ok.  I have done a netwotk trace using netmon to see if i can identify
    the reason for the slow startup (2 mins minumum for profile to load and for outlook to connect to exchange). The trace tell me that my local pc tries to make a direct connection to the office365 external IPs first, then tries the TMG proxy. Once it hits the
    proxy, it kicks into life and works.
    So it looks to me like it thinks the external IP address of office 365 is an internal address and spends it time trying all the ip addresses until it trys the proxy.  At this point, the
    Bypass Proxy Server for Local Addresses is ticked.
    As soon as i untick this box, all traffic heads directly to the proxy and of course it connects like lighting.  The exchange settings proxy is set in outlook for "on fast networks, connect using HTTP first, then connect using TCP/IP" (tick
    is on) and the same for slow networks.
    I cant for the life of me work out why it tries to connect directly to the external IPs first and not connect via TMG until i untick the
    Bypass Proxy Server for Local Addresses
    Would love any ideas that may assist.

    We have been in discussions with Microsoft over the last few days on this issue - which is seen with Outlook 2007 versions onwards.  Extract from resolution communication from Microsoft:
    The issue you have raised is known as it has been reported and when you have a proxy set in Internet Explorer and “Bypass proxy settings for local addresses”, Outlook will attempt to connect to Office 365 directly – like the bypass rule would apply.
    Because the direct connection is blocked in the Firewall, Outlook needs to have the connections going in Timeout before attempting to connect using the Proxy.
    Your network trace proves the issue.
    Microsoft have scheduled a fix for Outlook 2010 in February 2014 cumulative update. A fix for Outlook 2013 will also follow, but Outlook 2007 will not be addressed because it is in Extended Support.
    There are two possible workarounds for this behaviour:
    First, and I wouldn’t recommend it, is to allow Direct traffic through the Firewall to Office 365.
    The advantage of this approach is that it will be done centralized and it will impact everyone immediately.
    Information about the O365 IP addresses
    There are two downsides to this behaviour:
    1.  First you need to maintain the Firewall exceptions as IP from O365 server can change without notice
    2.  Second, winhttp traffic may go through both proxy and direct and this can cause unforeseen behaviour.
    The second approach is to use a proxy pac instead of manually setting in the proxy and the exceptions.
    The advantage is that you will have centralized method to control how winhttp traffic goes and the issue will not be experienced anymore.
    If a single pac does not be fit, you can configure proxy pac files for each site requirements and use an IIS server to store it.

  • Java doesn't bypass proxy for IPs using (IP-Subnet) combination ??

    Dear All,
    On Mac OS I am getting the below problem, I didn't tried it on Windows may be this problem may not occur there.
    Problem:---
    On Mac OS (Leopard).
    When bypassing proxy IP in "Network Settings->Advanced...->Proxies->Bypass Hosts & Domains" field is given as IP-Subnet combination, e.g. 192.168.60/24, then in Java while trying to connect with HttpUrlConnection's connect() method, and then getting response code using HttpUrlConnection's getResponseCode() method it returns response code 407 i.e. Proxy is required. But safari works well for that,
    This Java API works well when I directly give IP as 192.168.60.X it works (Java API) well.
    I tried System.getProperties().setProperties("http.nonProxyHosts","192.168.60/24"), then also it doesn't works.
    Please tell me any solution, suggestion or workaround or any document that tells it may not be done through Java API.

    I think System.getProperties().setProperty("http.nonProxyHosts",any host name, IP with * or |) works well for Windows.
    Now may be specifying the range of IPs using subnet on Mac OS (e.g.192.168.60/24) is different than on windows (e.g. 192.168.60/255.255.255.0) and therefore this fails on Mac OS. Although Java is given by Mac for its OS, but I think they didn't made any changes for this API.
    Now the question is whether its a bug in Java Mac or there is some workaround present for that???
    Do you have any idea that I am going right way or not??

  • Apache reverse proxy and SSL termination

    Hi Guru's
        Can anyone tell me, how to do SSL termination at apache reverse proxy. I am using apache reverse proxy for accesing portal from internet. Apache is configured for SSL and portal is NON SSL.
    I am using header variable login module in portal. i wanted to terminate SSL at apache reverse proxy and then all traffic after that should be clear text.
    should i maitain any property. is there any documentation for it.
    Please help me
    Tom

    The majority of the work here is around configuring your Web Dispatcher and Apache Reverse proxy. The work on the portal is straight forward enabling of SSL.
    You can follow http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/f1/2de3be0382df45a398d3f9fb86a36a/frameset.htm for setting this up.
    what level I need to configure SSL and how do I proceed in both scenarios?
    Your question itself says where you need SSL. SSL is required where ever you need HTTPS communication.
    how do I proceed in both scenarios?
    From a portal perspective, the configuration should remain the same.
    Do I have to install SSL at portal, web dispatcher or at Apache level?
    SSL needs to be configured at all the 3 levels if you are looking at end to end SSL implementation.
    See the following for possible SSL implementation options:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/d8/a922d7f45f11d5996e00508b5d5211/frameset.htm
    https://cw.sdn.sap.com/cw/docs/DOC-115509
    Will SSL termination work for scenario 2?
    Yes this should work - see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/36/fd39eacf4cde4a8fe32d7f29b3db16/frameset.htm
    However in case of SSL Termination, the request to your portal from the web dispatcher will be sent as HTTP.
    I would recommend you to take a step by step (backward approach).
    First, enable SSL on your portal and make sure it works - going directly to the server.
    Then, you can introduce the Web Dispatcher - and test if every thing works going through the web dispatcher.
    Finally - you can test the end to end flow - with your Reverse proxy involved.
    - Shanti

  • Bypass Proxy for Local Addresses

    All-
    With the new 2.0 software, I am now able to connect my 3G iPhone to the WiFi network at work. The network uses an authenticated proxy to get external access. I can access external sites just fine now, but I can't see internal sites. The proxy settings on my work desktop give me the option to "bypass proxy server for local addresses".
    Is there any way to do this on an iPhone?
    Right now I need to make a choice between access only internal sites or only external sites.
    Thanks!
    MF

    While not wanting to be a total weenie, ME TOO
    After a bit of searching, the best we're going to be able to do right now is use a Proxy Auto-Config (.pac) file. I'm drawn to this conclusion from combining a lot of web searches with a peek at the "iPhone and iPod touch Enterprise Deployment Guide, Second Edition" (available at http://manuals.info.apple.com/enUS/Enterprise_DeploymentGuide.pdf, or via the Apple iPhone Enterprise support page at http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/enterprise/.
    Setting the PAC file using the iPhone v2.x software is pretty direct - click the little arrow next to the network you want to configure, scroll down to the bottom where the proxy settings live. Choose "Auto" and enter the Auto-config URL.
    That's the good news. The bad news is that I'm not entirely sure what that entails w.r.t. using one with the iPhone software. I'm not entirely clever enough to create such a file nor am I clever enough to know how to stick such a file onto my iPhone. I'm going to run this around my local team to see what they can come up with. If they come up with a solution (and it's simple enough for me to do AND explain), then I'll post a follow-up. Until then, good luck to you AND if you figure something out feel free to share with everyone else.
    Ron

  • Proxy and filter on same port

    Hi all,
    On our BorderManager 3.8 server we've got a HTTP-proxy listening on port 8080. Now, a new external web-app requires a direct connection on port 8080 also. I thought about defining a statefull filter allowing port 8080 from internal to external for that specific site but I'm not sure if this would cause conflicts or security issues in any way. I don't think so, but because it's better to be safe than sorry....I thought I'd ask. ;-)
    Arnold...

    In article <_7z%j.371$[email protected]>, Arnold Jesse
    wrote:
    > On our BorderManager 3.8 server we've got a HTTP-proxy listening on
    > port 8080. Now, a new external web-app requires a direct connection
    > on port 8080 also. I thought about defining a statefull filter
    > allowing port 8080 from internal to external for that specific site
    > but I'm not sure if this would cause conflicts or security issues in
    > any way. I don't think so, but because it's better to be safe than
    > sorry....I thought I'd ask. ;-)
    >
    First, realize that the proxy is listening on port 8080 only for
    requests coming to the proxy's IP address, so it's not going to
    conflict with a request to port 8080 on a remote web site. What
    should be happening here is that (on port 8080) you send the proxy a
    request to a web site that uses port 8080. The proxy sends a request
    to the web site using port 8080 instead of the usual port 80, that's
    all.
    What could well be a problem here is that the default 3.7-3.9 filter
    exceptions do not allow port 8080 out from the public IP address of the
    proxy. You will have to modify the default filter exceptions to allow
    that traffic, whether you want to connect directly through NAT or
    through the proxy. My advice is to connect through the proxy, and
    modify the filter exceptions to allow the traffic.
    At the least, you could configure a custom filter exception for
    stateful port 8080, like the defaults. Look at the defaults in
    FILTCFG.NLM to see how they are done, and add a new one.
    Personally, I don't like to add custom filter exceptions one-by-one for
    every non-standard web server out there. I use a more global approach,
    detailed in the advanced chapter of my BMgr filtering book (see url
    below).
    Craig Johnson
    Novell Support Connection SysOp
    *** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
    BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***

  • Skype partially ignoring proxy settings

    Skype is partially ignoring my proxy settings, the video and audio itself is going through the proxy but for some reason it is ignoring my proxy and is making direct connections to db3msgr6012716.gateway.messenger.live.com and blu405-m.hotmail.com, I have researched this issue and apparently it was discovered in 2012 so why isn't this fixed yet?

    I am running into the same issue with a few
    sites...especially since the TCP timeout to realize that is has to
    revert to a proxy is not conducive. I would think a client side or
    registry setting would fix this, but cannot find where to change
    that. Any ideas?

  • Connect Skype to my Proxy

    I have a proxy set up on my mac, and I wanted to know how to route all skype traffic through that proxy.  Someone was able to find my IP address through skype and i'd like that to not happen again.

    Just to update, don't know for what reason now I'm able to access the internet thru proxy after establish the VPN connection to my office.
    I did not change any setting at all and suddenly able to access thru proxy but I just can't ping the proxy server ip, the rest server ip I'm able to ping...strange...

  • Problem with proxy and DNS

    Hello,
    in our company we use Internet Explorer 8... (i know...) We also have a proxy and 4 DNS servers. Last weekend we suddenly had an issue where internet pages could not be loaded. When we did some testing with Wireshark we saw that it took a long time to query
    www.google.com or www.microsoft.com. The query went from the first DNS server to the second and so on. This behaviour was shown on Windows 2008 R2 servers with Citrix and also the workstations and laptops with Windows 7.
    When we deleted the DNS servers from the network settings and set the proxy ip-adres in the browser the problem was solved. So the problem had to be in DNS.
    After that we deleted the list of Root Hints and the problem seemed to be solved. However, when we look in wireshark we still see that external addresses are queried againts our local DNS servers. In internet explorer we have a policy active where the proxy
    is set. We have two proxies and the problem exists with both of them.
    So the question is, why does IE8 still query all four DNS servers even when we have a proxy? Why is there a lot of delay there?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Generally, if you configure IE with an explicit proxy:
    1.User types an address
    2.The address is checked for string matches against the IE proxy exceptions list
    a. If matching a bypassed entry, DNS is used to resolve the name, and the client connects directly to the target IP address on port 80 (assumed), then sends a request like:
    GET /something.htm HTTP/1.1
    Host: fulldomainame.example.com
    b. If non matching, continue
    3.The client connects to its configured proxy and sends a request of the form:
    GET http://fulldomainname.example.com/something.htm HTTP/1.1
    (this use of the FQDN in the URL is one way you can tell that a client thinks it's talking to a proxy instead of a real web server)
    4.The proxy resolves the name, connects to the target site, etc, etc
    So what’s your configuration of proxy?
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

  • My Macbook all of a sudden can't open Skype, Word, Excel, Powerpoint and Entourage. I have done research and read that it has something to do with malware and viruses. Please help I feel like I have tried everything!

    This started a few days ago, when I noticed skype would not open and keeps quitting unexpectingly. Now it's all of my microsoft office programs. I have read horrible things on the internet about creeps building some sort of 'backdoor' through Mircosoft Word and are now able to access my macbook. I want to feel safe again and I want to be able to use skype again. I think I will delete Microsoft office until I find/can afford a better version.
    I have tried deleting and re-installing the programs, PRAM-ing my mac, doing the utilities organizing thing, and I downloaded 4 different scanners (Cleanmymac, VirusBarrier Express, Bitdefender Virus Scanner, and ClamXav) to help get rid of this and only one scanner found a small file that was harmful. I need some advice PLEASE!
    Thank you for your time!

    Elliottarian wrote:
    Thanks MadMac0 I followed the instructions in Terminal for the link you sent and all my programs open again!
    Sorry I'm just getting to this now, but a lot going on today in this front. There is now a "K" version of Flashback and perhaps more going on.
    A couple of considerations you need to be aware of.
    It's clear from the results of your testing that the reason you were infected is because your Java is out of date, so it's important that you keep all your software up-to-date going forward.
    But even that won't protect you from this new "K" version as Apple has not released the patch to it yet, so I encourage you to disable Java in all your browsers and consider doing so for everything by opening Java Preferences (located in /Applications/Utilities/) and unchecking the box next to "J2SE 6.0" and any other box that might be checked. If you find that some application(s) you need must use Java, then you should enable it only to run that application(s).
    We cannot be certain that what you did totally killed the Trojan, so your best bet would be to restore your Mac back to where it was before you were infected using TimeMachine. If you don't have a TimeMachine backup or cannot determine the date of infection, then your safest solution is this one:
    Courtesy of Linc Davis:
    I suggest you take the following steps immediately:
    1. Back up all data to at least two different devices, if you haven't already done so.
    2. Boot from your recovery partition (if running Mac OS X 10.7 or later) or your installation disc (if running an earlier version of the Mac OS), launch Disk Utility, and erase the startup drive. This action will destroy all data on the drive, so you must be sure of your backups.
    3. Install the Mac OS.
    4. Reboot and go through the initial setup process to create an account. Don’t import anything from your backups at this stage.
    5. If running Mac OS X 10.6.x or earlier, run Software Update.
    6. Restore the contents of all the top-level subfolders of your home folder except “Library” from the most recent backup. You can also restore the files in the Library folder, but don’t restore any of its subfolders; only the files contained in those folders, and only if they’re visible in the Finder. Don’t restore any hidden files or folders, no matter where they are.
    7. If you’re running Mac OS X 10.5.x or earlier, disable Java in Safari’s preferences, and leave it disabled until you upgrade to Mac OS X 10.6.8 or later, including all available updates. The Java web plugin is unsafe to use under older versions of the Mac OS. Note: I’m not referring to JavaScript, which is unrelated to Java, despite the similarity in the names.
    8. Change every Internet password you have, starting with banking passwords. Check all financial accounts for unauthorized transactions. Take this step only after you’ve secured your system in the preceding steps, not before.
    9. Reinstall your third-party software from fresh downloads or original media, not from backups which may be contaminated. If you use any third-party web browsers under Mac OS X 10.5.x or earlier, disable Java in their preferences, as you did with Safari in step 7.
    Of course, as of this morning you should follow my instructions for disabling Java and ignore his, at least until Apple gets that Java patch out.
    Pay particular attention to Step 8 no matter what you decide to do.

  • Web Application Proxy and Safari

    Morning, all.
    I've installed and configured the new Windows Server 2012 R2 AD FS and Web Application Proxy, and I've run into some strange problems. I had some initial problems getting it to work, the documentation is a bit thin, but I now have Sharepoint and Webmail
    published to the Internet.
    I'm using x.509 Certificate Authentication for Extranet.
    In IE on a Windows 8.1 Surface Pro everything works. I can log in using ether a softcert or a SmartCard.
    On my OS X Mac I can log in using Chrome, but Safari won't work.
    Same thing on my iPad running iOS 7.0.4, Safari won't work. Interestingly enough, on my 7.0.4 iPhone it DOES work. Even more interestingly, I CAN Workplace Join the iPad using the URL https://<adfs fqdn>/enrollmentserver/otaprofile but
    I can't authenticate using the URL https://<adfs fqdn>/adfs/ls/IdpInitiatedSignon.aspx.
    I get to select my certificate, but after that I'm getting this error message: "Safari cannot open the page because too many redirects occurred." In the Event log on the AD FS server I'm getting this:
    Encountered error during federation passive request. 
    Additional Data 
    Protocol Name: 
    Saml 
    Relying Party: 
    http://<adfs fqdn>/adfs/services/trust 
    Exception details: 
    Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.InvalidRequestException: MSIS7042: The same client browser session has made '6' requests in the last '0' seconds. Contact your administrator for details.
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.Protocols.PassiveProtocolHandler.UpdateLoopDetectionCookie(WrappedHttpListenerContext context)
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.Protocols.Saml.SamlProtocolHandler.SendSignInResponse(SamlContext context, MSISSignInResponse response)
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.PassiveProtocolListener.ProcessProtocolRequest(ProtocolContext protocolContext, PassiveProtocolHandler protocolHandler)
       at Microsoft.IdentityServer.Web.PassiveProtocolListener.OnGetContext(WrappedHttpListenerContext context)
    Since it does work on an iPhone running the same browser, and Workplace Join does work on the iPad even if nothing else does I'm thinking there's some UserAgent voodoo going on in parts of the Web Application Proxy. It's no big deal that Safari in OS X doesn't
    work, we can always run Chrome, but the iPad is a major problem and a total deal breaker if I can't fix it.
    I would appreciate some good advice.

    Hi,
    As both IE and Chrome work, I think it’s more a client side issue.
    Maybe you need to clear you browser cache and cookies.
    This also worth a try:
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2640030/adfs-v2-0-error-msis7042-the-same-client-browser-session-has-made-6-request
    Please Note: Since the web site is not hosted by Microsoft, the link may change without notice. Microsoft does not guarantee the accuracy of this information.
    Hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for