Version 4 Bug - Multiple Object Editors of Same Object on Single Click

Hi Jeff,
thanks for your reply. You have missed that rule because you don't use SQL Developer for development. But never mind, lets go through it...
1) Of course I have both options activated (all preferences were imported from previous version). The difference between previous version is that when you click on the SAME table multiple times - in the old version, it opened the table just once and in case you had another tab active, it swithed to the tab where the table was opened. So to have it clear, in the old version when you have table A and table B, both opened in separate tab and the focus was on table B, when you clicked on table A (in the tree) it activated tab with table A. It didn't create new tab with table A. Of course - why would I want to have multiple tabs opened with the same table??? In current version clicking on the same table multiple times, opens multiple tabs with the same table.
This is also the reason why it sometimes openes a table multiple times even when you click it just once. This you cannot simulate because you are probably connecting to some local DB when you have perfect connection. Activate the autopin function and connect to different DBs all over the world and you will see what I mean. Right now, I have opened a connection and got 3 tabs opened, just after a single click on a table.
2) Fetch size is again taken from previous version of SQL Developer and is set to 50. PgUp and PgDown are not working at all. I am talking about scrolling with a mouse wheel. In the old version it is working normally as expected. In this version if you scroll using a mouse wheel, the scroll speed is about 1 or even 0.5 lines per wheel round - so you can even not use a mouse wheel for scrolling! On all other places in this new release (connection tree, packages, ...) the scrolling is working normally, in the table it is unusable.
3) I don't say it is on every table and every click. I cannot tell you how often is it because I am not using the new version. I am quite sure this is dependent on the connection speed maybe connectin quality. The difference between previous version is that in the previous version, refresh always worked. This particular issue cannot be solved by testing and searching for some rule when it happens. You must check the code and see when you display it!
4) My screen resolution is 1920x1200, but that is only because I have an external monitor connected to my laptop. My laptop resolution is only 1366x768. Switch to this resolution and open the View menu.
New worksheet - yes, this is exactly what I mean. I have planty of connections, for sure over 100 - but this is irelevant. Whenever you do a menu which can grow, you need to do it scrollable!!!
I am not sure what you mean by Flyout menus, but I am scared only to hear about it

Screen resolution, no scrolling on menus - that's a bug. Severity 2, a bad one, as you have noticed, and we'll try to make sure it's addressed for version 4.0.
The other issue isn't as straightforward as you insinuate. I know you don't care about the particulars or why you might see this issue, so I won't bore you. But, we are aware that this is still coming up more frequently that it should, and we're on a big bug hunt to eradicate the behavior completely. It's not a simple thing, so it will more likely be incremental improvements. That being said, we are seeing it MUCH less than in previous versions of the tool.

Similar Messages

Multiple Transports for the Same Object.

I have ABAP program 123 and I make a change, create transport A and release the transport. I do not request transport A go to production.
I then modify ABAP program 123 again, create transport B and release the transport. I do not request transport B go to production.
Now I request transport A go to production.
Can someone explain to me why the changes in transport B are included when transport A is moved to production?
I thought each transport would be at its own change level.
Thank-you.

I can guarantee all of you that when Transport A was moved, it contained changes that were made in Transport B.
Surely you understand that Thomas is correct and that there's a logical reason, not related to transport layer configuration, for the issue? You CAN have multiple transports open for the same object without a lock by forcing it but check the dates as already suggested...

Can we have multiple transports for the same object.

Hi guys,
Can we have multiple transports for same object in dev system. Can anyone tell me how can this be done.
Thanks

Its not possible for the same development object. Only 1 person can access an object at a time and if mutiple users modify an object new TASKs are created under the same TRANSPORT.
Only after releasing the tr you can create a new tr on the same object.
Message was edited by:
Abhishek Jolly

Multiple inserts for the same object

We have observed that in certain cases, the same object is attempted to be inserted twice, resulting in Primary Key violation.
Here is one example -
A(1->1)B, unidirectional, A has the foreign key to B
new B
copyB = register(B) (also assign sequence number)
new A1, A2
A1.set(copyB), A2.set(copyB)
register(A1), register(A2)(also assign sequence number)
commit
it tries to insert the same B twice.
any clues whats wrong here?
thanks

Any chance your 1:1 from A to B is marked as privately-owned?
This would indicate to TopLink that the object in each relationship is unique and should be inserted.
Doug

Bug - multiple related instances of same class

We've discovered a rather subtle bug in the process by which Kodo
searches for reachable related objects to persist. If an instance of a
PC class (A) has two relationships to the same PC class (B), and both
related instances of B have the same value for their PK-field, then only
one of the related instances of B will be persisted.
Obviously, this problem only occurs in the context of application
identity. We've only encountered it when all the instances involved are
newly created and being made persistent for the first time (else the
instances would have different PK-values). It should also be noted that
we're assigning PK-values in jdoPreStore(). Here's the specific
situation we encountered:
Class A has two relationships to class B, represented by fields "B b1"
and "B b2". In our case, A.b1 is the many-side of a bidirectional
one-to-many relationship; the one-side is implemented by a field "List
aList" in B. A.b2 is the navigable side of a unidirectional
relationship; there is no corresponding field in B. (We haven't checked
whether or how the cardinality or navigability of the relationships
affects the problem.)
Let "a1" be the sole instance of A. If a1.b1 is set to an instance of B
but a1.b2 is null, and makePersistent( a1 ) is called, then a1 and b1
are persisted correctly and the relation field b2_id in TableA is NULL.
However, if a1.b2 is set to a second instance of B and both instances of
B have the same initial value of their PK-field, then a.b2 is not
persisted. Only one record is added to TableB; it corresponds to A.b1.
Interestingly, in this case the relation field b2_id in TableA is not
NULL, but has the default value of b2's PK-field. jdoPreStore() is not
called on b2 and b2 is not persisted, but its PK-field is read in the
process of persisting a1.
Since we've placed the jdoPreStore() callback in a common non-persistent
adapter superclass, we're currently able to work around the problem with
a static "seed" PK value that is incremented in the superclass default
constructor to provide a unique initial value for each PK-field. If
anyone would like the code for this approach we'll post it, although
it'll become unnecessary when the problem is fixed.
Jerry Pulley
Sr. Developer
Commerce Technologies, Inc.

I'm curious what behavior, besides throwing an exception, could even be
possible. If the pm discovers two object with the same id, it seems that it
has to choose one of them to make persistent. How could it possibly resolve
differences in the fields of the two instances in deciding which one is the
correct one to put in the db? Additionally, allowing this behavior could
lead to subtle, difficult to detect bugs in your program, since ( as Abe
points out ) JDO promises that there will only be one instance of an object
with a given primary key per PM. Other code may make decisions based on
this expectation ( like refreshing one of the objects after making a change
in a different PM ), that would lead to problems for code still hanging on
to the second instance.
IMHO, it should throw an exception.
-Eric
"Abe White" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Thanks for the bug report! However, I'm not entirely sure that this is a
bug (at least not the bug you think it is); either way it's an extremely
interesting case. The reason I say it might not be a bug is thatassigning
pk values in jdoPreStore seems suspect.
We know that a single PM cannot at any time contain multiple instances
with the same oid value, app id or otherwise. This is obvious from the
getObjectById method -- only one object can have a particular oid.
We also know that jdoPreStore is called only for instances managed by a
PM (duh!).
Thus it should not be possible to see a case where jdoPreStore is
called for 2 objects with the same initial oid.
Now, I realize that when you're dealing with persistence-by-reachability
things become less clear. However, I think the general point stands: at
the time that the objects are made persistent they all must have unique
oid values, and objects must be made persistent before jdoPreStore is
called.
Technically we could get around this. The current
persistence-by-reachability algorithm is something like:
flushed = {}
while flushed.size < persistent.size:
for each persistent instance:
if instance not in flushed:
instance.jdoPreStore // may persist more instances
instance.persistFirstClassFields // may persist more too
flushed += instance
In sum this is a breadth-first method of persisting relations. It could
be changed to a depth-first system instead of persisting all first class
fields each one is persisted and then immediately the algorithm is
repeated for that object before the other fields are touched. However,
this seems like it might lead to other unexpected behavior.
Generally, it just seems like waiting till jdoPreStore to assign the oid
of an object seems like a bad idea. I think the real bug is that Kodo is
not throwing an exception as soon as 2 object with the same oid are
detected (currently it just lets one overwrite the other in the cache,
which results in the behavior you see).
Does anyone else have an opinion on this? I'm certainly not fixed on my
interpretation of things; if you disagree I'd be very interested in
hearing other arguments.

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

Combine Multiple SQL's of Same transaction into single SQL Transaction

Hi All,
I have a requirement where I have multiple changes happen to Same row which need to combined into one SQL
For example
Extract
INSERT Row1
Update Row1
Update Row1
Update Row1
Commit
On Replicat
Insert Row1
Update Row1
Commit
Is it possible to combine these 3 updates into 1 Update?
Thanks,
Vijay

Hi Mackbell,
We are dealing with cross company replication and we have multiple scenarios where client should not know what are the additional columns we do have . We don't want to have definition files at target, client can add additional columns to their table and we don't care about those. Similarly we don't want to send multiple updates to client, when I update a column which I don't that transaction should not go to client. If I am able to combine 3 updates to one on three different columns on single commit we can send 1 update instead of 3, this will also be layer of security for us. they can see trail files what kind of updates we do and over the network I can minimize number of transactions
Thanks,
Vijay

Returning multiple instances of the same object?

I have a fairly straight forward swing test class that contains a combobox. The problem is that an object is not selected in the combobox because I get different objects when building the list and when setting the selected item.
To test this, I've added the following set of 4 lines on three locations in the code:
- immediately after Toplink is initialized
- when setting the selected item
- when the main exits (and the JFrame is open)
Stand s = Stand.findByPK(4).getDerrivedfromstand();
System.out.println( s + ", Using EM #" + Integer.toHexString( lEntityManager.hashCode() ) );
s = Stand.findByPK(1);
System.out.println( s + ", Using EM #" + Integer.toHexString( lEntityManager.hashCode() ) );
I happen to know that Stand 4 is derrived from Stand 1. So I get Stand 1 once via Stand 4 and once directly. The result is:
java.vm.version=1.6.0-b105
[TopLink Info]: 2007.05.30 11:01:10.531--ServerSession(33414193)--TopLink, version: Oracle TopLink Essentials - 2.0 (Build b41-beta2 (03/30/2007))
[TopLink Info]: 2007.05.30 11:01:11.343--ServerSession(33414193)--file:/C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/toeu/My%20Documents/kp/reinders/reinders/voorraad/container/bm/build/-reinders login successful
// immediatly after Toplink init
[1] setObject=4 / SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = >>>HERE<<< )
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = ?)
[1] setObject=1 / SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = >>>HERE<<< )
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = ?)
nl.reinders.bm.Stand@1866417, Standnr=1, Using EM #1a8e53c
[1] setObject=1 / SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = >>>HERE<<< )
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = ?)
nl.reinders.bm.Stand@1866417, Standnr=1, Using EM #1a8e53c
// when filling a combobox in the GUI
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand ORDER BY standid ASC
getElementAt 0 = nl.reinders.bm.Stand@1866417, Standnr=1
// when setting the value of the combobox
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand ORDER BY standid ASC
[1] setObject=4 / SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = >>>HERE<<< )
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = ?)
[1] setObject=1 / SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = >>>HERE<<< )
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = ?)
nl.reinders.bm.Stand@171ef98, Standnr=1, Using EM #1a8e53c
[1] setObject=1 / SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = >>>HERE<<< )
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = ?)
nl.reinders.bm.Stand@171ef98, Standnr=1, Using EM #1a8e53c
// when exiting the main (JFrame is open)
[1] setObject=1 / SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = >>>HERE<<< )
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = ?)
nl.reinders.bm.Stand@171ef98, Standnr=1, Using EM #1a8e53c
[1] setObject=4 / SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = >>>HERE<<< )
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = ?)
nl.reinders.bm.Stand@171ef98, Standnr=1, Using EM #1a8e53c
[1] setObject=1 / SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = >>>HERE<<< )
executeQuery: SELECT ... FROM stand WHERE (standnr = ?)
nl.reinders.bm.Stand@171ef98, Standnr=1, Using EM #1a8e53c
What is amazing is that somewhere after the combobox is filled, the query returns another instance of the same record and thus the select item will not find an "equal" object in the list. Any suggestions?

Nevermind. A clear was done on the EM somewhere down the line.

I'm having problems in a GOOP application with multiple instances of the same object running simultaneously.

I?ve written an application to control a system with multiple lamps. Each lamp in the system has its own power supply. Each lamp object contains a reference to its power supply. The application contains an array with the references to all the lamps in the system. Each lamp is in charge of monitoring itself and setting its power supply?s voltage according to the applications commands, therefore each lamp needs that its ?run me? method will run as long as the application is running i.e. the run method has to be reentrant. Because there are multiple lamps and because the ?run me? methods for each lamp run simultaneously, to over come this problem each lamp has a met
hod ?run? that calls ?run me? with ?RUN VI? invoke node with the ?Wait until done? set to false. When I run the application, it seems to work but if I check the AO there is no change in the output, and the lamps seem to be reading their input from the same channel. I can?t seem to find the problem, I think that the fact that the method is reentrant causes some sort of mix-up in the separate object references. Also because the method is reentrant I can?t debug it (with one lamp it seems to work ok). Does anyone have any idea what could be causing this problem.
P.S I'm having problems attaching my sample program to this message. You can contact me at [email protected] to recive the sample program I wrote.

Jean, Thanks for your answer, I've tried checking the invoke node that calls the "Run VI" method but it doesnt return an error any of the times its called even that the Vi that it called is still running. I also tried your solution of changing the object's "Run" method to a template but that doesnt work either. I can't seem to post the sample progam that demonstrates the problem, is it possible to send it to you by email, contact me at [email protected]
Attachments:
Sample_program.zip ‏926 KB

Multiple blocking locks on same object

we have a database that is providing a great deal of application 'freezing' due to lock problems that were not experienced before moving to a new 10g database environment.
one of the items i believe to be of interest is the fact that when this 'freezing' occurs then a look at the database locks reveals that more than one TX exclusive blocking lock is held on the same database object without any waits showing.
my understanding is that this should not be the case? that only one user should possess the exclusive transaction level lock and that the other user should only have an outstanding request for this same level lock?
any information you can provide would be most appreciated.
thanks in advance.

You would need to find out the sql the application is executing when those locks freeze like that. From there determine if there is a logical syntax issue or get the explain plan to ensure it isn't for example an update statement on a massive table that has improper indexing.
Also, do you see other sessions blocking other sessions as orafad suggested? In this scenario my original explanation is different. If the locks are all chained on waiting on another session, that means the first session that is blocking is updating the same data that the waiters are wanting.
In my opinion you need to find out the exact SQL causing these locks to ensure it is an issue with one of your applications. Determining the performance of that query is a must.
The only weird thing is you say there is no waits taking place....did you look in v$session_wait?
Lee

Multiple instantiations of the same object

Can someone please explain to me the difference of these two circumstances upon the JVM:
1) I declare an object outside the loop and instantiate a new object on each iteration of the loop
Object obj = null;
for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
    obj = new Object();
}2) I declare and instantiate the object inside the loop only
for (int i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
    Object obj = new Object();
}I assume in the first example that I am reserving memory space and overwriting it on each iteration, whereas in the second example I am reserving and consuming a new memory space on each iteration.
If that assumption is correct, which is the more efficient? Wouldn't option 1 be easier on garbage collection?

I compiled both cases using Sun javac (1.4.1) and used javap to view the compiled code. It looks the same to me. Here's the compiled code (for the loop) for the first case   2 iconst_0
   3 istore_2
   4 goto 18
   7 new #2 <Class java.lang.Object>
10 dup
11 invokespecial #1 <Method java.lang.Object()>
14 astore_1
15 iinc 2 1
18 iload_2
19 bipush 6
21 if_icmplt 7
24 returnHere's the compiled code the second case   0 iconst_0
   1 istore_1
   2 goto 16
   5 new #2 <Class java.lang.Object>
   8 dup
   9 invokespecial #1 <Method java.lang.Object()>
12 astore_2
13 iinc 1 1
16 iload_1
17 bipush 6
19 if_icmplt 5
22 return

Linking multiple accounts of the same resource with single identity of SIM

Hi,
Iam trying to link multiple resource accounts of the user with a single identity manager account. I'm able to achieve this using the 'resource type' also by doing a reconcile based on e-mail(which is same for resource account and IDM account), but i'm unable to link them using 'load from file' or 'Bulk upload'
I have tried in the following way
command,user,accountsLDAP.identity,accountsLDAP.identity
Update,134088230,"cn=134080,OU=people,dc=xxxx,dc=com","cn=134081,OU=people,dc=xxxx,dc=com"
Can any one help me in this regard

This is probably a bug or for some crazy reason intended to work this way. I have a similar issue, only difference being my resource is Sun Access Manager instead of LDAP. When I ran my code through Netbeans Debugger I saw that the resource account Fields that holds the value for resource account attributes, simply vanishes during a particular step of form processing. The only workaround I have at this point is to make those attributes as global.<attributeName> instead of accounts[<ResourceName>|<accountType>].<attributeName>
If anyone can get to bottom of this please post here. I'm going to raise a Support Ticket with Sun.
- AndyDev

Printing same Smartfom using single click on PRINT for many employee no.

Hi All,
This is my first question that i'm posting in the forum, hope u dont disappont me.
We made a smart form for HR-pay slip. It is working fine for one employee, but when a range of employees are selected it asks a print preview screen each time for every single employee. We managed to get rid of the pop up print preview screen but still on clicking PRINT, it prints first emp. smart form, then back (F3), and again print for second emp. HR people need to run this for hundreds of employee and cannot click print for each one of them.
So, all I wanted was that somehow on clicking PRINT the very first time it shall print for all the range of employees given.
Step.1.Get pernr.
Call SSFfunction module name for smartform ZHR_PAYSLIP
go back to (Step.1) picking the next pernr given while execution

Hi Vivek,
Thanks for your response, now i feel a member of the forum.
I am just a beginner in Smartforms.
Ur reply made me realise that i had not used SSF Open N SSF Close FM.
the fraction of the code is:
========================================
GET pernr.
CALL FUNCTION 'HR_READ_INFOTYPE'.
PERFORM process_pernr                                     "VKIK032705
    USING pernr-pernr pn-paper pn-permo payty payid bondt mc_incl
      pnpabkrs[] subrc.
IF exp_frm EQ false.
     CALL FUNCTION 'SSF_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME'
         EXPORTING
           formname             = 'ZHR_PAYSLIP'IMPORTING
          fm_name                  = formname
     control-no_dialog = 'X'.
     control-PREVIEW = 'X'.
         output_options-tdnoprint = 'X'.
         output_options-tdnoprev = 'X'.
         output_options-tdimmed = 'X'.
         output_options-tdiexit = 'X'.
     CALL FUNCTION formname
         EXPORTING
ARCHIVE_INDEX              =
ARCHIVE_INDEX_TAB          =
ARCHIVE_PARAMETERS         =
      CONTROL_PARAMETERS         = control
   NO_DIALOG                 =
MAIL_APPL_OBJ              =
MAIL_RECIPIENT             =
MAIL_SENDER                =
        OUTPUT_OPTIONS             = output_options
'output_options added by himanshu 6.12.2006
        USER_SETTINGS              = ' '
           v_amount                   = v_amount
IMPORTING
DOCUMENT_OUTPUT_INFO       =
JOB_OUTPUT_INFO            =
JOB_OUTPUT_OPTIONS         =
ENDIF.
===========================================
so u see as i have embedded the Call SSF FM stmnt. it executes the smartform for one pernr (personnel no.) and when it fetches the next pernr in the stmnt. GET PERNR, it executes the smartform again.
Is there a way when the smartform can call itself so that the output is successive and i dont have to press back button each time to see the payslip of the next personnel no.
Also plz advise where shall I use the SSF_Open and SSF_Close FMs.

Finalize() method being called multiple times for same object?

I got a dilly of a pickle here.
Looks like according to the Tomcat output log file that the finalize method of class User is being called MANY more times than is being constructed.
Here is the User class:
package com.db.multi;
import java.io.*;
import com.db.ui.*;
import java.util.*;
* @author DBriscoe
public class User implements Serializable {
    private String userName = null;
    private int score = 0;
    private SocketImage img = null;
    private boolean gflag = false;
    private Calendar timeStamp = Calendar.getInstance();
    private static int counter = 0;
    /** Creates a new instance of User */
    public User() { counter++;
    public User(String userName) {
        this.userName = userName;
        counter++;
    public void setGflag(boolean gflag) {
        this.gflag = gflag;
    public boolean getGflag() {
        return gflag;
    public void setScore(int score) {
        this.score = score;
    public int getScore() {
        return score;
    public void setUserName(String userName) {
        this.userName = userName;
    public String getUserName() {
        return userName;
    public void setImage(SocketImage img) {
        this.img = img;
    public SocketImage getImage() {
        return img;
    public void setTimeStamp(Calendar c) {
        this.timeStamp = c;
    public Calendar getTimeStamp() {
        return this.timeStamp;
    public boolean equals(Object obj) {
        try {
            if (obj instanceof User) {
                User comp = (User)obj;
                return comp.getUserName().equals(userName);
            } else {
                return false;
        } catch (NullPointerException npe) {
            return false;
    public void finalize() {
        if (userName != null && !userName.startsWith("OUTOFDATE"))
            System.out.println("User " + userName + " destroyed. " + counter);
    }As you can see...
Every time a User object is created, a static counter variable is incremented and then when an object is destroyed it appends the current value of that static member to the Tomcat log file (via System.out.println being executed on server side).
Below is the log file from an example run in my webapp.
Dustin
User Queue Empty, Adding User: com.db.multi.User@1a5af9f
User Dustin destroyed. 0
User Dustin destroyed. 0
User Dustin destroyed. 0
User Dustin destroyed. 0
User Dustin destroyed. 0
USER QUEUE: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
AFTER METHOD: false
User Dustin destroyed. 1
User Dustin destroyed. 1
User Dustin destroyed. 1
User Dustin destroyed. 1
USER QUEUE: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
AFTER METHOD: false
User Dustin destroyed. 2
User Dustin destroyed. 2
User Dustin destroyed. 2
User Dustin destroyed. 2
User Dustin destroyed. 2
User Dustin destroyed. 2
User Dustin destroyed. 2
User Dustin destroyed. 2
USER QUEUE: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
AFTER METHOD: false
User Dustin destroyed. 3
User Dustin destroyed. 3
User Dustin destroyed. 3
User Dustin destroyed. 3
User Dustin destroyed. 3
User Dustin destroyed. 3
User Dustin destroyed. 3
User Dustin destroyed. 3
User Dustin destroyed. 3
USER QUEUE: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
AFTER METHOD: false
User Dustin destroyed. 4
User Dustin destroyed. 4
User Dustin destroyed. 4
User Dustin destroyed. 4
User Dustin destroyed. 4
User Dustin destroyed. 4
User Dustin destroyed. 4
User Dustin destroyed. 4
User Dustin destroyed. 4
USER QUEUE: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
AFTER METHOD: false
User Dustin destroyed. 5
User Dustin destroyed. 5
User Dustin destroyed. 5
User Dustin destroyed. 5
User Dustin destroyed. 5
User Dustin destroyed. 5
User Dustin destroyed. 5
User Dustin destroyed. 5
User Dustin destroyed. 5
USER QUEUE: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
AFTER METHOD: false
User Dustin destroyed. 6
User Dustin destroyed. 6
User Dustin destroyed. 6
User Dustin destroyed. 6
User Dustin destroyed. 6
User Dustin destroyed. 6
User Dustin destroyed. 6
User Dustin destroyed. 6
User Dustin destroyed. 6
User Dustin destroyed. 6
Joe
USER QUEUE: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
AFTER METHOD: false
User Dustin pulled from Queue, Game created: Joe
User Already Placed: Dustin with Joe
User Dustin destroyed. 7
User Dustin destroyed. 7
User Dustin destroyed. 7
User Dustin destroyed. 7
User Dustin destroyed. 7
User Dustin destroyed. 7
User Dustin destroyed. 7
User Dustin destroyed. 7
User Dustin destroyed. 7
User Dustin destroyed. 7
INSIDE METHOD: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
USER QUEUE: true
INSIDE METHOD: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
User Dustin destroyed. 9
User Joe destroyed. 9
User Dustin destroyed. 9
User Dustin destroyed. 9
User Dustin destroyed. 9
User Dustin destroyed. 9
INSIDE METHOD: true
INSIDE METHOD: false
USER QUEUE: true
INSIDE METHOD: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
INSIDE METHOD: true
INSIDE METHOD: false
USER QUEUE: true
INSIDE METHOD: false
INSIDE METHOD: false
It really does seem to me like finalize is being called multiple times for the same object.
That number should incremement for every instantiated User, and finalize can only be called once for each User object.
I thought this was impossible?
Any help is appreciated!

Thanks...
I am already thinking of ideas to limit the number of threads.
Unfortunately there are two threads of execution in the servlet handler, one handles requests and the other parses the collection of User objects to check for out of date timestamps, and then eliminates them if they are out of date.
The collection parsing thread is currently a javax.swing.Timer thread (Bad design I know...) so I believe that I can routinely check for timestamps in another way and fix that problem.
Just found out too that Tomcat was throwing me a ConcurrentModificationException as well, which may help explain the slew of mysterious behavior from my servlet!
The Timer thread has to go. I got to think of a better way to routinely weed out User objects from the collection.
Or perhaps, maybe I can attempt to make it thread safe???
Eg. make my User collection volatile?
Any opinions on the best approach are well appreciated.

Single click object selection painfully slow

Hi,
I don't have any particular speed issue with illustrator CS6 in general.
However there is a massive speed problem when I'm trying to select on object on the artboard with a single click.
Is anyone else having the same issue? Is it simply a setting that may be wrong somewhere for me?
When selecting a object by creating a "rectangle" over the object it works fine and normal speed.
When clicking the object to select it, nothing happens for about 3/4 seconds, then the loading little rainbow circle appears and loads for another 3/4 seconds...
I really don't understand what's happening.
If anyone could help me that would be greatly appreciated (it's driving me insane)...
Thanks

Nevermind...
Finally found the reason after hours searching on the Adobe forum or google, and battling with different settings in illustrator...
For those who may encounter the same issue, I'm running "RightZoom" on my Mac to fully maximize my windows.
For some reasons they don't seem to like each other! Well, Illustrator doesn't like RightZoom...
To fix the issue, simply open RightZoom and deactive it for the time you're using Illustrator CS6. Job done, working super fine
You can re-activate "RightZoom" whilst you're done with Illustrator.
Hope it can save someone the hassle I had!

Version 4 Bug - Multiple Object Editors of Same Object on Single Click

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for