0FIGL_R10 cube Query - No Authorizations

Gurus,
I am getting error "No Authorizations" while executing query based on Remote cube 0FIGL_R10.
thanks

Hello,
<b>S_RS_AUTH</b> object needs to be assigned to your role/user id.Its used for BI Analysis Authorizations.
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

Similar Messages

Copy BW template (cube, query, web application) to multiple BW systems

We have a set of cube, query and web applications in a BW system. And we'd like to copy the set of objects to other BW systems as a BW template.
(Q1) We know we can transfer the set of obejcts to other BW systems by using STMS and AWB. But if so we have to make connection between two systems. We'd like to avoid coping the template via internet or intranet.
Is it possible to copy the BW template to other BW systems by using CD-ROM/DVD?
(Q2) When we do copy the template, if there is an InfoObject with same name existing in copy-to system, I suppose there will be an error. Is there a solution to avoid this situation?
Tetsuya

Hi Tetsuya,
here are more details for the procedure mentioned above:
Datafiles of transport requests are in most SAP-Installations located in /usr/sap/trans/data. They are named R<# of transport request>.<SID>
The cofiles are in most SAP-Installtions located in /usr/sap/trans/cofiles. They are named K<# of transport request>.<SID>
Do NOT change the names of the files. We've discovered that it's safer to zip those files, as some virus scanners in email-servers may scramble the files.
Locate the files in the appropriate directory of the target system and go to the import-queue using STMS.
Chose Extras / Other requests / Add to add the request to the queue (note: you must use the request number of the source-system e.g. <SID>K900123)
When you start the import, choose option "Overwrite Objects in unconfirmed Repairs", when you want existing objects to be overridden.
Hope, this helps
Robert

Unable to find Cube / Query in Catalog (Designer)

Hello,
Our current environment consists of BW Queries which are access by BO Universes. When creating a Universe we were able to see all queries but since we did some changes to the MP and cubes we don't see the queries anymore from BO Side.
Also the current reports fail with an error "Unable to find Cube <QueryName> in catalog".
The queries used in the universes are still visible and accessible in BEx Analyzer.
What I tried so far (with a super user) is:
1. Generate query again -> no change
2. Save the query again -> no change
3. Remove the flag u201CAllow external Access to this queryu201D, save query and flag the option again -> no change
4. Activate the MultiProvider again -> no change
5. Copy the query to another query u2013
     -> New query is accessible. This means the MP and cubes are not the reason. It seems like the query is gone in an inactive modeu2026
6. Used BAPI BAPI_MDPROVIDER_GET_CUBES to get the list of accessible queries.
     -> I see the same list as in BO. Most queries are missing. The ones that are in the list disappear whenever we try to access these queries from BO.
Did anyone encounter the same issue and was able to solve it?
Environment: SAP BI 7.1 EHP1 SP5, BO XI 3.1 SP2(1.7).
Thanks in advance.
Manu

Hi Manu,
your are talking about universe designer here - right?
We have the same behaviour currently in Crystal 2008 designer and universe designer.
In both we can see the same but not the complete list of queries.
We made sure the "allow external access" option is set in BEX.
We resolved both issues with same root cause : adjust Query properties -> Req. status ->   ...
Pls refer to thread Unable to find BW Query while creating connection with universe designer as well - thanks Ingo !
- logon to the SAP system
- start transaction RSRT
- enter the technical name of the BW query in the syntax CUBE/QUERY
- click Properties
- set the second item called Req.Status.
- set that one to 0
Let us know if this helped !
Holger
Edited by: Holger Brasch on Mar 26, 2010 11:58 PM

Create computed field in cube query

I have a cube query in Hyperion 9.3.1 from an Essbase database and I want to add a computed field, but the option does not appear to be available. Can I add a computed field to this type of query?

first download it to result and then you can do whatever you want. To have the look and feel of query, you can again form a pivot out of that.
You can also add that computed item to essbase and then fetch it via the query.
Regards,
rahul

IR with Essbase(Cube Query)-retrieval of all Level 0/1/2/../n members ?

Hi,
Is there any way where we can retrieve or place all members in same Level/Generation to Rows/Columns in Interactive Reporting studio 9.3.1 - Cube Query ?
Thanks in advance,
Ajay

Hi,
Try this query and modify as per your requirement:
SELECT
T0.[Father] as
'Assembly',T0.[code] as 'Component1', t10.[ItemName]
'Description1',T1.[Code] as 'Component2', t11.[ItemName]
'Description2', T2.[Code] as 'Component3', t12.[ItemName]
'Description3', T3.[Code] as 'Component4', t13.[ItemName]
'Description4',T4.[Code] as 'Component5', t14.[ItemName]
'Description5', T5.[Code] as 'Component6', t15.[ItemName]
'Description6'
FROM
ITT1 T0 LEFT OUTER
JOIN ITT1 T1 on T0.Code = T1.Father LEFT OUTER JOIN ITT1 T2 on
T1.Code = T2.Father LEFT OUTER JOIN ITT1 T3 on T2.Code = T3.Father
LEFT OUTER JOIN ITT1 T4 on T3.Code = T4.Father LEFT OUTER JOIN ITT1
T5 on T4.Code = T5.Father LEFT OUTER JOIN ITT1 T6 on T5.Code =
T6.Father left outer join oitm t20 on t0.father = t20.itemcode left
outer join oitm t10 on t0.code = t10.itemcode left outer join oitm
t11 on t1.code = t11.itemcode left outer join oitm t12 on t2.code =
t12.itemcode left outer join oitm t13 on t3.code = t13.itemcode left
outer join oitm t14 on t4.code = t14.itemcode left outer join oitm
t15 on t5.code = t15.itemcode
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Getting ORA-03001 on cube query

I am getting a ORA-03001 error on the following query - I am utlizing a cube query and the main data view (subquery) is using a connect by. I believe it is the connect by which is causing the problem as I have tried the query with the table data (BASEDATA) and it works fine. I also tried removing the having clause, and that worked. Looks like a bug. I am on 10gR2.
SELECT progm.attrib_id,NH.workstream1_parent_id, nh.cost_type, nh.cost_benefit, eh.expense_majorgroup_id, eh.expense_group_id, b.year_,b.period_id, b.measure, data_type_id,
Sum(Value) value
,grouping_id( b.cost_centre_id, NH.workstream1_parent_id, progm.attrib_id) NH_ID
,grouping_id( b.Expense_type_id, EH.expense_group_id, EH.expense_majorgroup_id) EH_ID
,grouping_id( b.year_,period_id) yRPER_ID
,grouping_id( nh.cost_Type, nh.cost_benefit) Cost_ID
FROM projectmeasure_data B, nomlocationhierarchy NH, nomexpenseshierarchy EH
, (SELECT workstream1_parent_id, wspa.attrib_id FROM workstream1_parent_attrib WSPA inner join
attributes AA ON WSPA.attrib_id=AA.attrib_id WHERE attribType_id=28) Progm
WHERE B.cost_centre_id=nh.cost_centre_id AND
b.expense_type_id=eh.expensetype_id AND
b.measure_id=cm.measure_id AND
progm.workstream1_parent_id=nh.workstream1_parent_id
group BY b.measure, b.data_type_id,
cube ( b.cost_centre_id, nh.workstream1_parent_id, progm.attrib_id,
b.expense_type_id, eh.expense_group_id, eh.expense_majorgroup_id,
b.YEAR_,period_id, nh.cost_type, nh.cost_benefit)
HAVING
(grouping_id( b.cost_centre_id, NH.workstream1_parent_id, progm.attrib_id) IN (4,6,7))
AND
(grouping_id( b.Expense_type_id, EH.expense_group_id, EH.expense_majorgroup_id) IN (4,6,7) )
AND
( grouping_id( b.year_, b.period_id) IN (3,1,0))
AND
(grouping_id( nh.cost_Type, nh.cost_benefit) in (1,0))
where
ProjectMeasure_data is
SELECT
A.Cost_Centre_ID,
A.Expense_Type_ID,
A.Period_ID,
A.Year_,
A.Data_Type_ID,
M.RptSlot AS Measure,
A.Value,
H.Measure_ID
FROM ( SELECT Cost_Centre_ID, Expense_Type_ID, Period_ID, Year_, Data_Type_ID, measure_id, BASEDATA.Value
FROM BASEDATA
WHERE ((Year_=2004 AND Measure_ID=1) or ( Year_ >= 2005)) and BASEDATA.Data_Type_ID in (1,2) ) A , qrycurrentmeasures M,
(select connect_by_root(measure_id) root_id, measure_id, CASE LEVEL WHEN 1 THEN switch_year*100+switch_per ELSE Decode(PRIOR(end_period),13,PRIOR(end_year)+1,PRIOR(end_year))*100+Decode(PRIOR(end_period),13,1,PRIOR(end_period)+1) END switchyrper, PRIOR(end_year)*100+PRIOR(end_period) prior_endyrper, end_year*100+end_period endyrper, LEVEL D
FROM measuretypes
CONNECT BY NOCYCLE PRIOR future_measure_id = measure_id
union
SELECT root_id, measure_id, switchyrper, prior_endyrper, endyrper, D FROM
(SELECT connect_by_root(measure_id) root_id, measure_id, switch_year*100+switch_per switchyrper, Decode(end_period,1,end_year-1,end_year)*100+Decode(end_period,1,13,end_period-1) prior_endyrper, Decode(PRIOR(switch_per),1,PRIOR(switch_year)-1,PRIOR(switch_year))*100+Decode(PRIOR(switch_per),1,13,PRIOR(switch_per)-1) endyrper, LEVEL D
FROM measuretypes
CONNECT BY NOCYCLE PRIOR hist_measure_id = measure_id) WHERE D <> 1
) H
WHERE
(m.measure_id=H.root_id) AND
(H.measure_id=a.measure_id ) AND
( (yearperiod(a.year_,a.period_id) BETWEEN H.switchyrper AND h.endyrper) OR
(h.switchyrper IS NULL AND yearperiod(a.year_,a.period_id) <= h.endyrper) )
I ended up using a temporary table to store the results of projectmeasure_data. Does anyone know a way around this? to me it looks like a bug.

I'm still wondering about this one.

Knowing DataSource, Cube, Query, how to identify Master Data datasource?

Hi,
based on a research on FI-FM at http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/71/d3143cb1b8be00e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
I saw the flow as: first Query(based on cube 0FIFM_C01), the cube which gets data from 2 datasources (0FI_FM_1 & FI_FM_2) through 2 infosources: 0FI_FM_1 and FI_FM_2.
1. What do I need to install on BI to get this going and in which order?
2. In particular, knowing DataSource, Cube, Query do I figure out the Master Data data I need to get this query functional?
Once you know of the specific master data datasources what do I need to do to get this query functional?
Thanks

Dear Amanda,
Let's clarify your questions.
1.Install the cube and related stuff.
RSA1 -> Business content -> Choose " in data flow before" -> install the Cube
2. For the master data and related hierarchy.
RSA1 -> Find the InfoCube -> Right click, find a option such as "display data model". I am not sure about the exactly description because i am not in front of the SAP system.
you can find all the related InfoObject in the right panel.
It is good if you check all of those master data and load them daily. But it is a big job and sometimes it is not necessary. You can:
1) Clarify the business need. to konw which kinds of fields are "Must" for the end user anlaysis and make a list of that.
2) check the list and most of the master data will load by other moduels. for example, cost center, material, customer ... they are too common that you can expect they are in some process chain and loaded daily basis already.
3) load the master data in your list and no one load it before, or discuss with the ownder of process chain, if you need change the load frequency such as from weekly to daily.
Edited by: Brian Yang on Jul 12, 2009 8:54 PM

BW Authorization by hierarchy for 1 object/cube/query, rest unrestricted

Hi all,
I've just created my authorization object in RSECADMIN to maintain authorizations by 0PROFIT_CTR Hierarchy.
This is based on a single characteristic, cube, and by technical node name.
I've tested it and it seems to work fine, however, I would like the same users to have unrestricted access to all other cubes that use 0PROFIT_CTR Hierarchy, but how would I do that?
I created a seperate role in where I've maintained object S_RS_AUTH for this particular authorization only.
Normally S_RS_AUTH would give full access to all (*) values, but now it's restricted.
Still I want the users to display the full hierarchy for any other cubes/queries. Creating a seperate role to give all access obviously doesn't work, as that would bypass my earlier authorization settings.
Please help, any questions let me know.
Thanks
M

Hi,
this certainly is an option, but since we have dozens of cubes which use 0PROFIT_CTR as an object.
It woulld be quite a time consuming solution to set up; besides, the maintenance not just by each new cube but also by role would be pretty significant I believe.
There should be a more direct and simpler way to set this up, shouldn't there?
I've tried to create a copy of the hierarchy that is restricted by node for each profit center group, leaving the original hierachy unrestricted for any cube and user.
Somehow this doesn't work either, probably because I have given (*) unrestricted access in the role, besides the authorization object I specifically created for the restricted access cube/hierarchy, so one overwrites the other!
Any other suggestions?
Thanks!
M.

Error in Opening a query after Authorization.

Dear Experts,
in a requirement to restrict the users to access some specific queries only I have created the role and assigned some queries to those role in PFCG. The user is able to see only the authorized queries when he login to BEx Analyzer . Now the problem is that when he opens the query instes of getting the prompt for variable values entry he is getting some message as
" Error in specifying the value for variable for Fiscal year and plant."
however the query is opened success fully with my ID which has all authorization.
in Role maintenance I have provided following authorization to the user .
1. Business Explorer - Global variables
2. Authorization Check for RFC Access
3. Transaction Code Check at Transaction Start
4.BI Analysis Authorizations in Role
Business Explorer - Components
Business Explorer - Components: Enhancements to the Owner
Business Explorer - Enterprise Reports
Business Explorer - Folder View On/Off
Data Warehousing Workbench - Hierarchy
Data Warehousing Workbench - InfoCube
Data Warehousing Workbench - InfoObject
Data Warehousing Workbench - MultiProvider
Data Warehousing Workbench - DataStore Object
Authorization Object for RS Trace Tool
5. Business Explorer - Variants in Variable Screen
could please some one tell where i am missing , are what is wrong with it.
Thanks !

you may wish to try executing the queries using the RSECADMIN and analyzing the log for the same.
Hope it Helps
Chetan
@CP..

SAP BO WebI Report on top of BI Bex Query with Authorization Variable

Hi,
We are trying to restrict row level data using BI 7.0 analysis authorization concept. We have an authorization variable in the Bex query and is working perfect in Bex Analyzer as well as in RSRT.
Now we are trying to achieve the same thing in BO webI. We created an Universe using Authentication Mode SSO. We are on BOXI 3.1 and implemented SSO. When we try to run the query in WebI we get the error
"A database error occured. The database error text is: Error in MDDataSetBW.GetCellData..(WS 10901)"
Just for testing purpose, when we use query filter in WebI and use Values from List, it is showing only the authorized value it supposed to show and runs well with that value selected. But we have to achieve this without the query filter in WebI.
So are we missing some thing here or any patch issue? Please share if you have done this type of reports in BO.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Moorthy.

Yes I did run MDXTEST and it gives error as 'you do not have sufficient authorization'. The reason it is giving, I guess and we are debugging that to confirm, is first it looks for 0BI_ALL and throws error which is not the case in Bex. See the following trace in RSRT trace.
InfoObject Properties Defined
Reading of Directly Assigned Authorizations
Direct Assignment Does Not Include Universal Authorization 0BI_ALL
Reading the Indirect Assignments with Authorization Object S_RS_AUTH
Does user have OBI_ALL?
No, the User Does Not Have Universal Authorizion 0BI_ALL
Negative Entry in SU53 Result of Failed Check for 0BI_ALL
Indirect assignments found; no universal authorization
Reduction of Authorization Dimensions on Characteristics in InfoProvider
Reduction Successful
Thanks!
Moorthy

Help required for a Remote cube query

Hi,
We are working on Remote cube, which has a source from a view built on R/3 base table. I need to extract the data to BW based on a current date due to huge volume of data(performance reasons) in the table. I have used an exit on R/3 to restrict to current date but the extract checker was showing the valid data ie only for current date. When i had built a query on Remote cube, the Report was showing complete data(restriction not working). We have even tried using an inversion routine in transfer rules to pass the selections to the Source system even then it doesn't work. Could you help if you have come across same kind of situation or you can suggest an alternate solution on the same but we have to use Remote cube.
Any suggestions asap would be highly appreciated and rewarded with full points.
Regards,
Raj

I can think of two ways to do it
Simple with no ABAP coding is a view
Create a view between a timestamp table and your big table
Put an entry into your timestamp table of the current date - then use a selection of this inside the view
Unforutunately you cannot use SY fields inside database views (otherwise you could have used these as a selection condition in the view)
The best way to do it is using a function module and passing the data from the query into the SQL statement
I prefer to do it the last way and also pass data through a generic structure - thus you manipulate the data inside the intial loop in the function module and don;t utilise further loops downstream in transfer rules
(to try and keep the reponse time down)

Eorror in Opening a query after Authorization

Dear Experts,
in a requirement to restrict the users to access some specific queries only I have created the role and assigned some queries to those role in PFCG. The user is able to see only the authorized queries when he login to BEx Analyzer . Now the problem is that when he opens the query instes of getting the prompt for variable values entry he is getting some message as
" Error in specifying the value for variable for Fiscal year and plant."
however the query is opened success fully with my ID which has all authorization.
in Role maintenance I have provided following authorization to the user .
1. Business Explorer - Global variables
2. Authorization Check for RFC Access
3. Transaction Code Check at Transaction Start
4.BI Analysis Authorizations in Role
Business Explorer - Components
Business Explorer - Components: Enhancements to the Owner
Business Explorer - Enterprise Reports
Business Explorer - Folder View On/Off
Data Warehousing Workbench - Hierarchy
Data Warehousing Workbench - InfoCube
Data Warehousing Workbench - InfoObject
Data Warehousing Workbench - MultiProvider
Data Warehousing Workbench - DataStore Object
Authorization Object for RS Trace Tool
5. Business Explorer - Variants in Variable Screen
could please some one tell where i am missing , are what is wrong with it.
Thanks !

Hello,
Check whether the user has the access to the plant and company code.
This is related a BW security , please re-post the same thread in BW forum or preferably in BASIS forum, they may be able to guide you properly.
Prase

Essbase ASO Cube query performance from OBI EE

Hi all
I have serious problems of performance when I query an ASO cube from OBI EE. The problem born when I implement a filter in some dimension of model in the Business Model and Mapping layer. This filter is to level-0 of the dimension, the values are obtained from a session variable in OBI EE. The objetive of this is apply filters depending of users. Then, for session variable I've a table in relational dabase base with relation between user and "access", then my dimensions (not all) have as level-0 the "access" of users (as duplicated members).
The session variable in OBI EE is filled with row-wise option, so it has all values of "access" that correspond to user (:USER system variabe).
When I query only by one of this filtered dimensions the respond is very fast, When I query for one of this filtered dimensions and a metric the respond is fast (10 seconds). But when I query for two of this filtered dimensions and metric the respond take 25 minutes. I checked Essbase app log and found this:
+[Mon Nov 15 19:56:01 2010]Local/TestSec5/TestSec5/admin/Info(1013091)+
+Received Command [MdxReport] from user [admin]+
+[Mon Nov 15 20:28:28 2010]Local/TestSec5/TestSec5/admin/Info(1260039)+
MaxL DML Execution Elapsed Time : [1947.18] seconds
When I look the MDX query generated by OBI I see that the aggregation process is doing in the fly in the members filtered of the crossjoin of two dimensions:
With
set [CATALOGO_INSTITUCIONAL2] as '[CATALOGO_INSTITUCIONAL].Generations(2).members'
set [CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO2] as '[CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO].Generations(2).members'
*member [METRICAS_PRESUPUESTARIAS].[MS1] as 'AGGREGATE(filter(crossjoin (Descendants([CATALOGO_INSTITUCIONAL].currentmember,[CATALOGO_INSTITUCIONAL].Generations(7)),Descendants([CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO].currentmember,[CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO].Generations(7))),(([CATALOGO_INSTITUCIONAL].CurrentMember.MEMBER_ALIAS = "01.01" OR [CATALOGO_INSTITUCIONAL].CurrentMember.MEMBER_Name = "01.01")) AND (([CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO].CurrentMember.MEMBER_ALIAS = "G" OR [CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO].CurrentMember.MEMBER_Name = "G") OR ([CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO].CurrentMember.MEMBER_ALIAS = "I0101" OR [CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO].CurrentMember.MEMBER_Name = "I0101") OR ([CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO].CurrentMember.MEMBER_ALIAS = "S01" OR [CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO].CurrentMember.MEMBER_Name = "S01"))),METRICAS_PRESUPUESTARIAS.[Compromiso])', SOLVE_ORDER = 100*
select
{ [METRICAS_PRESUPUESTARIAS].[MS1]
} on columns,
NON EMPTY {crossjoin ({[CATALOGO_INSTITUCIONAL2]},{[CATALOGO_PRESUPUESTARIO2]})} properties ANCESTOR_NAMES, GEN_NUMBER on rows
from [TestSec5.TestSec5]
Can somebody tell me if is possible to change the way in that OBI built the query or if is possible to use aggregations previously materialized of essbase?

hi Amol,
1. On what basis , did you estimate your cube to around 400GB to 600GB.
2. If ASO is an option, its huge advantage lies in space, its does not take more space , unlike BSO.
3. I have seen cubes ,who size was around 300-400GB in BSO,when made the same cube into ASO , its consumed space of 40GB-45GB.
HOpe this helps
Sandeep Reddy Enti
HCC
http://hyperionconsutlancy.com/

Need a Query/User Authorization Report

Hello All,
I am looking for tables, function modules, programs etc that will aid in building a report that will show every query and which users have access to them.
This program I am wanting to build will serve as a periodic "reality check" on our authorizations.
I am not sure about the tables/programs etc involved in interpreting the user's roles/profiles.
My current thinking is that there may be a function module or program that is being by the BEx tools that comes up with the list of queries that the user has access to when they first select the query they want to run. Getting a hold of that would be very beneficial.
Any ideas?

Hi,
Refer the below links
www.das.state.ne.us/nis/security/docs/authorized_agent_manual.pdf
script.wareseeker.com/PHP/uas-user-authorization-system.zip/18033
eda.ogden.disa.mil/users_guide/trainMaterial/GeneralAdminMaint.ppt
www.umaryland.edu/eumb/Documents/user_aff.pdf
www.mariewagener.de/node/98
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BI/AuthorizationinSAPNWBI?focusedCommentId=78053701
www.bi-expertonline.com/downloads/Smith.doc
https://aisweb.wustl.edu/hr/benefits.nsf/pages/files/$file/hrmssecurityauth07.pdf
www.sapdev.co.uk/sap-bw/queryexit.htm
naresh

Not sufficient authorization to run a query : multiple authorization

Hello,
I have ran into an issue way beyond my BW skills concerning authorizations used to restrict Queries data for certain characteristics. I am not sure which information are relevants, so here is all I gathered :
Screenshot of the rsecprot transaction after the Query has failed to run:
[http://f.imagehost.org/view/0113/rsecprot]
As you can see on this screenshot, we want (the query is requesting, I suppose) "AND /BIC/OR_CA4010 = ':' " and the authorization is "OR_CA4010 I CP * " so this okay, and the second part, we want "/BIC/
OR_CA0111/BIC/OR_CA4001 = ':' " and the autorization is only for "OR_CA0111__OR_CA4001 I EQ USA9996" so this is probably the part which fails, since the query is requesting all the data while the user only has access to one value.
In my poor understanding of the issue, it seems that this isn't a normal behavior, one would assume that queries would restrict themselves to allowed data, and this is what actually happens when there is only one authorization involved. However, with two, the mix doesn't seem to work...
What is interesting is that if I set the values for OR_CA4010 (in the variable entry screen) for instance to the values "Node 1" and "Node 2" seen in the rsecprot, then the query is working fine and if I set it to another value, then the query doesn't work , so it seems that the issue isn't really the authorization themselves, but the way we set them up.
Any idea on what the issue may be? Any guidelines on how to set up authorizations in queries ? Maybe we missed something obvious which make it works in most cases but not in this one (since otherwise the queries are working fine, we don't have many user which this kind of authorization set up)
Thank you very much in advance!
Guilaume

Abhishek,
Thanks for your interest, I'm glad you took a peek at this thread
I am not sure what you are asking tho ... So to make things simpler, I created a very simple query with only the following things :
-> Two characteristics as rows, the two which are mentioned in rsecprot (OR_CA4010 and OR_CA0111__OR_CA4001), as you can see on the previous screenshot
-> Those two characteristics have a restriction in "Default Values" : a variable for each, which have been created as "Processing : By Authorization" (one is a "Hierarchy Node", for OR_CA4010 which has a hierarchy, and the other one is just a "Characteristics Value")
So, as you can see, you can't make it more simple ! And I still get the same error and the same log in rsecprot. Is it any helpful to you ?
Is there anything else I need to check? The authorization given to the user contains values for those two characteristics...
This is driving me crazy

0FIGL_R10 cube Query - No Authorizations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for