0HRPOSITION master data issue when position is delimited

We are live with BW HR application and having issue with 0HRPOSITION master data. We are extracting data from SAP using 0HRPOSITION_ATTR datasource. I noticed that data is not maintained correctly in master data tables in BW and giving us incorrect results in reporting. Consider below mentioned scenario:
Position A created as vacant on 05/01/2008 with start date (BEGDA/ Valid from) as 05/01/2008 and End date (ENDDA/ Valid to) as 12/31/9999 and is vacant. Below mentioned entry is shown under maintain master data for 0HRPOSITION in BW:
Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
A 04/30/2008 01/01/1000
A 12/31/9999 05/01/2008 X
Position A is now delimited on 09/15/2009 as its no more required. In SAP, position has record only from 04/01/2006 till 09/20/2009 as vacant. When record is extracted in BW, it creates below mentioned entry in master data table.
Position           Valid To     Valid From     Position Vacant Indicator
    A             04/34/2008    01/01/1000
    A             09/20/2009    05/01/2008                  X
    A             12/31/9999    09/21/2009                  X
Entry 09/21/2009 - 12/31/9999 is incorrect as position does not exist for this duration and it is neither vacant nor occupied. If we report on 0HRPOSTION with key date as 09/30/2009 , it shows position A as vacant though position no longer exists.
Has anyone come across this situation. any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Prithi Iyengar
Edited by: Prithi Iyengar on Dec 23, 2009 3:07 PM

Hi,
We do a full update data load for 0HRPOSITION attribute as well as text on daily basis. Attribute change run are scheduled in the process chains. No issues with that..
In the report, we have the display option of 0HRPOSITION as key and text. Now what is happening is that for most of the positions the text is displayed perfectly but only for those positions which were delimited the text description is not displayed in the report. It is displayed as blank. For eg consider positions A, B, C and D. Say A, B are active positions and C & D have been delimited at a cerain period of time.
*Master data table is:*
Position -- Valid_from -- Valid_to -- Description -- Org. Unit
A         -- 01.05.2008 -- 31.12.9999-- Text1   --- A001
B         -- 01.06.2009 -- 31.12.9999 -- Text2   --- B001
C         -- 01.06.2009 -- 01.08.2009 --- Text3 --- C001
C         -- 02.08.2009 -- 31.12.9999 -- ........   --- ....
D         -- 01.07.2008 -- 15.06.2009 -- Text 4 --- D001
D         -- 16.06.2009 -- 31.12.9999 -- ........ --- ...
In report, say i run for date 01.05.2009 to 31.05.2009,
Position -
No. of positions
Key -
Text
A     | --- Text1 | 1
B     | --- Text 2 | 1
C     | --- .......... | 1
D     | --- .......... |1
If you notice, the description is maintained for positions C & D in time period 01.05 to 31.05 but the text is not displayed in the report.
Thanks,
Edited by: Prithi Iyengar on Dec 23, 2009 5:30 PM

Similar Messages

Issue with 0hrposition master data

We are extracting data from SAP using 0HRPOSITION_ATTR datasource. I noticed that data is not maintained correctly in master data tables in BW and giving us incorrect results in reporting. Consider below mentioned scenario:
Position A created as vacant on 04/01/2006 with start date (BEGDA/ Valid from) as 04/01/2006 and End date (ENDDA/ Valid to) as 12/31/9999 and is vacant. Below mentioned entry is shown under maintain master data for 0HRPOSITION in BW:
Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
A 03/31/2006 01/01/1000
A 12/31/9999 04/01/2006 X
Position A is now delimited on 09/15/2006 as its no more required. In SAP, position has record only from 04/01/2006 till 09/15/2006 as vacant. When record is extracted in BW, it creates below mentioned entry in master data table.
Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
A 03/31/2006 01/01/1000
A 09/15/2006 04/01/2006 X
<b>A 12/31/9999 09/16/2006 X</b>
Entry 09/16- 12/31 is incorrect as position doesnt exist for this duration. If we report on 0HRPOSTION with key date as 09/30/2006, it shows position A as vacant though position no longer exists.
Has anyone come across this situation. any help is greatly appreciated.
Kamal
P.S: Milind Rane...I was searching through the forums and came across your post.I would appreciate if you could let me know how you solved this issue...
Message was edited by:
Kamal K

HI KK
I have a similar issue. Can you please let me know how this Issue with 0HRPOSITION_ATTR extractor was resolved. In my case i have incorrect data in BW when reporting is done. THrough the extractor untill the PSA i have the correct records coming but in the master data 0HRPOSITION i have incorrect records.
Please help.
Thanks
Hari
Message was edited by:
SAPCOOL

QM Master data issue

Dear all,
We want to begin using the INPUT PROCEDURE addin in our QM module, we already have customized this addin but now we are facing a master data issue, that is, when we update the inspection characteristics master data, the actual inspection plans do not take this changes into account.
My first question is: Is there any way to force the actual inspection plans to be updated with the actual inspections characteristics parameters ?
In particular, we want to force the option 'Input processing' in the control indicator, and the Input processing value in the Quant. Data.
Alternatively, is there any way to mass update this informations directly at inspection plan-characteristic level ?
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
I followed this steps, actually already had the 'Replace master insp. characteristics' indicator set, however, when I do changes in a MIC, either creating a new version or not, the system does not show the list of where used plans.
Maybe is there further customizations ?
Thanks a lot!

Master data Issue --- materials have unassigned or # values ...!!

Hello Experts,
I am facing an issue that the Customer Data is missing in a BEx Report.
Data Flow is 2LIS_13_VDITM --> DSO1 --> Merging DSO --> Cube --> Multiprovider --> Bex Report.
Exact issue is Customers in the Bex Report has unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District.
The only reason a customer should show up under u201Cunassignedu201D or u201C#u201D is if itu2019s improperly set up in the system.
customers are assigned with two values. one which has data and the other which has unassigned value.
I wanted to know, how do i check if the matierials are valid to have unassigned Values ?
Checked the Merging DSO and saw that there are actually values assigned values for the affected matierials.
After that checked the Cube data values are displayed except the Master Data values.
I guess..its completely related to Master data. I would like to know how can i resolve this issue.
Please reply me if you face this kind of master data issue in your expeiriance.
Thanks,
SN.

Hi,
Are Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District are attributes of Customer?
In case they are, then the customers will be unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District in case the data for these attributes is loaded to the customer attributes.
and also check if the customer characteristic is properly assigned in the multiprovider.
Check if it helps.
Regards,
Joe

Time dependant Master data issue

Dear Experts,
I have a master data object 0DF_HRPOSTN which is time denpendant in that a position will have validity dates like when its first loaded as below
BI
Pos1001 01.01.1000 to 31.12.9999
later from source system this position validity might be ended like
pos1001 01.01.1000 to 31.12.2010
the problem is the infoobject is having key as position and end to date now even though this position validity is changed to 31.12.2010 BI is still holding the reocrd 31.12.9999 which is creating lot of issues, what can i do to rectify.
Thanks and Regards
Neel

Hi Diogo & Mark,
Actually the issue is see for example
John--Manager-- 01.01.1000 to 31.12.2009
John----
Sr Manger -
01.04.2009 to 31.12.2010
John -
Sr Manager-----01.04.2010 to 31.12.9999
Here John is no more in company so his position is stopped but as per standard BI now also has the thrid record
So when i want to select all the people who are active then i will get even john positions becuase condition will be like End to date
Greater than system date
I think that when we want to stop a positions validity then its should not get another entry ending to 31.12.9999.
So kindly help me selecting right records in my transformation and reports
Thanks and Regads
Neel

PO date issue when scheduling replenishment

Hello Guys,
i'm currently experimenting an issue that i don't understand.
when I try scheduling RWRPLPRO program (WRP1) with a timezone UTC+11 for my step user,
the document date of my purchase order is the system date and not a user date.
Is there someone who knows what I have to do to get a timezone based date on my Purchase Order document date ?
Thanks in advance

Hi Vivek,
Yes, the availability check is working in both the cases, when I create the sales order, I key in the Configurable material code, then do the configuration, after that system does availability check, in both the cases the result of availability check is same with one component marked as a missing part, available date as 20.12.2011.
One more thing if I try to view the Production order at the time of SO creation before saving it, the Production order shows today's date, but when I save the SO, and do Credit release, the actual Production order gives different scheduling date based on customer. Just wondering what could be affecting based on Customer, is there any other field present in Customer master which could alter the date.
I also saw today's scheduling note in some of the cases, but its not coming up in all of the orders created with today's date and moreover the same components are getting scheduled for 20.12.2011 also for diff customer.
I am afraid I can't provide any screenshots for this as am not permitted to publish any screenshots of the client.
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

Master Data Issue

Hi BW Guru's,
I have an issue with standard master data data source in BW system. In R/3 side they have done modifications for the existing strucuture and based on the modification they want to see the values but where as when we load data the values are not getting (Daily we will load master data through process chains). And the strange thing is when we do full load manually with the same info source the values will be uploaded. and the users can see the values.
The data source is 0CUST_COMPC and the modification that they have done remapping of Customers to the salesrep and this will show an impact on the Collector.In BW we are facing the following issue that the change of collector is not updated in BW
why is this field not considered into the deltas....?
Is there any OSS note which support to pull this field in to BW please suggest me.
can any one help me on this issue. Your help will be appreciated in advance.
Thanks,
Ganni

Dear Venkat,
Once you have Added the New Fields in BW Side, You have to Reinitialize the Delta .
And I dont think the master data would be very frequently changing as the data comes from KNB1 , so may be this is the result the delta is not coming for those fields, But You have Reinit again to get deltas working properly after enhancing KNB1.
Hope it helps..
Thanks,
Krish

Error when generating master data routines when activating infoobject

Hello Gurus,
I had an issue with one of my info object.
I Created the one Custom InfoObject with Just 5 Char without any masterdata and used that in many cubes. we promoted the objects and cube to test and production systems. just couple of days back we can see the InfoObject went to inactive status even though the version is active(not sure how it happend). This is only happens in our test system and production is working fine. when i try to activate the InfoObject again the test system it gives me an error
Characteristic XXXXX: Error when generating master data routines. Tried to correct in RSD5 etc. Checked in RSRV everything is fine. Tried to re-promote the object from Development system. The transport also failed with the same error even though it is in unconditional mode.
Can you please suggest me what are the options.
i cannot delete the object as it is used in many cubes which is having data.
Appreciate your quick response.
Thanks,
Bhaskara Rao.

If your Prod is working fine, it should work in test too.
Did it ever worked in test after transport?
Is it possible some one tried to change something in test? If yes, you will get error when you will try to re-transport it as new transport can't find the previous structure.
You may try to activate the IO using FM RSDG_IOBJ_ACTIVATE
Edited by: ashok saha on Mar 6, 2008 8:05 PM

MASTER DATA ISSUE , VENDOR MASTER

Hi,
I have a problem in vendor master. first i will explain the scenario.
we have two company codes one is in America, and the other is Europe.we have two purchase organisations called X (meant for america)& Y( meant for Europe) . X and Y has two plants called AMO1 (meant for america), US33. ( meant for Europe). purchase org X is assigned to plant america (us33),purchase org Y is assigned to Europe(am01).we are using centralized POrg. so we asshined to POrg to Plant.
Now when i am creating vendor master data. system is accepting for compay code Europe for Purchase org X( america). How it will happen?. It should propose X only.but i created vendor master record for cross combination of different assignment.Folks can you please suggest solution. SAP SHOULD THROW ERROR MESSAGE IF I CREATE THIS TYPE OF COMBINATION.But that doesn't happen.waiting for reply

Hi Vamsi,
Normarmally we can map the procurement structure by three ways.
1. Corporate Specific Enterprise Structure : where CC will assigned to Plant and Plant is assigned to POrg., In this case CC & POrg. assignment dont happen i.e.
a. POrg. can procure the material for any CC.
b. Vendor master can be created with any combination like CC ( USA) & POrg. (Europe) or CC ( Europe) & POrg. (USA), here system will not throw any warning/Error message.
and I am sure Vamsi your client is using Corporate Specific Enterprise Structure mapping.
2. Company Specific Enterprise Structure : Here CC will assigned to Plant and Plant is assigned to POrg., In this case CC & POrg. assignment does happen i.e.
a. POrg. can procure the material for only specific CC assigned with specific POrg..
b. Vendor master cannt be created with any combination like CC ( USA) & POrg. (Europe) or CC ( Europe) & POrg. (USA), if you will try then system will throw any warning/Error message.
i.e. .vendor Master can be created only CC ( USA) & POrg. (USA) or CC ( Europe) & POrg. (Europe) combination.
3. Plant Specific Enterprise Structure : Here assignment will be same as Company Specific Enterprise Structure.
POrg. can procure the material for only specific plant ssigned with specific POrg..
Hope this piece of information will help you to resolve your issue.please let me know if you want any more clarification.
manoj singh

Master Data issue from external system to BW

Hi,
BW Version: BI 7.0
Source System : Oracle D/B
The Data will be processed by some external application and the processes Data will be stored in tables in Oracle D/B.I am extracting Data from Oracle Tables to BW.
The issue i had is in the external application for example if we created a new Location ID,The new location ID won't be avaliable in Oracle untill i use it (assing it to any employee)
Once i assign it to employee then the Location ID and Description will be avaliable transaction tables.
Then in this cas how can i load master data to location ID in BW.
or
Thanks

Hi,
Simply create a Location ID InfoObject that will work as Master Data. Then create a datasource for the extraction of the Location ID Master Data (at least for the attributes, and probably for the texts as well).
You can then schedule an update of this data everynight via process chains.
All this will update the desired information independently from the transaction data.
Hope it helps,

Master data error - when switching an attribute to navigable

Hi,
I have a serious problem on a master data. I have this master data that until yesterday did have not a problem.
Now, when I add an attribute not navigable (DIS), no problem. When I switch to DISPLAY and activate, following error occurs:
Error in activating the InfoObjects
Characteristic 0FS_CTR_NO: The attibutes SID table(s) could not be filled
Error in BW:
Error when activating InfoObject 0FS_CTR_NO
Characteristic 0FS_CTR_NO: Error when generating master data routines
Error when resetting InfoObject 0FS_CTR_NO to the active version
I tried to make this modification also directly in Quality without transport, and the error is the same.
Master data is empty, so I cannot understand why there is a problem with SIDS.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Gianluca

Hi,
as Raj said, when infoobject attribute is changed from dispaly attribute to navigational attribute there will be impact.
check this thread.
Link: [Error when activating 0MATERIAL after adding Navigation attribute]
Regards
Daya Sagar

Cost Center Master Data Issue for Hierarchy

Hi,
We are building a hierarchy on Cost Center and realized that the way Master data on Cost Center is stored in SPM it's getting concatenated with Controlling Area. So CC 1234 becomes 1234_010 where 010 is a controlling area.
While we understand a need to make CC unique across several controlling area, it's impacting Hierarchy. In Hierarchy we only upload CC and not CA.
Do you recommend to do concatenation of CC & CA for Hierarchy as well so that it matches with Master? Or is there any other recommended way to go ?
Regards

Hi Rohit,
That was helpful. We will certainly take concatenation route.
However in Invoice Extract File we do get CC & CA separately in XARCOCTR & XSACOARR fields respectively.
When you say that this is concatenated even on Transaction Data are you talking about data AFTER it is loaded into SPM ? Also when data is sent out to DSE will it have CC & CA concatenated ?
Regards,

Incorrect Master Data Issue

Hi
We have incorrect master data in 0CUST_SALE object. It is due to some of the enhancements done in the Update/transfer rules. Because of this, we have extra records in BW. Like 110 record for actual 10 records. We are unable to delete the master data as there are transaction data already present.
We have identified the root cause, why this has happened. Has anyone faced similar issue before and how is it being fixed?
Jith

Hi Jith:
Why do you think the master data is incorrect because there are 110 records for 10 master data records?
0CUST_SALES is Customer compounded to Sales Area. For each customer sales area combination there can be a record in that table.
Sales Area is Division / Dist Channel / Sales Org. The number of combinations of customer compounded to sales area can be many for a single customer as there can be many divisions many dist channels and many sales orgs.
Are you sure the master data is incorrect? I don't know of a way to delete master data without deleting transactional data that uses that master data.
Only thing you can do is to overwrite those master data records.
Hope you find a solution.
Good Luck.
MP.

General Master data issue

Hello Good People!
How can I address this issue..................... The general master data of the G/L account is not maintained in the chart of accounts INT. ...... Please highlight steps to address this issue
Thanks
Note : Please post question clearly along with error message to enable quick responses,
also search forum before posting.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Aug 19, 2011 10:04 AM

Hi,
What I understood here G/L account is not created for chart of account INT.
So create G/L account through T-code FS00 for your company code and make necessary assignment in OBYC for the G/L account.
Regards

Make Indicator "check bw master data" mandatory when creating CVC in MC62

Dear All,
There is a requirement to make the indicator "check bw master date" mandatory while creating CVC using tcode /sappao/mc62.
I have tried SHD0 - transaction variant. This field is not shown.
Is any other way to realize this?
Thanks,
Bin

Hi,
It is not possible to make the indicator "check bw master date" mandatory as this is generated program.
To meet your requirement using BADI /SAPAPO/SDP_MASTER method SET_COMBI_VALUE_CHECK you can force the
system to check 'BW master data' or if this flag is not set then throw the error message.
Regards,
Sunitha

0HRPOSITION master data issue when position is delimited

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for