PO date issue when scheduling replenishment

Hello Guys,
i'm currently experimenting an issue that i don't understand.
when I try scheduling RWRPLPRO program (WRP1) with a timezone UTC+11 for my step user,
the document date of my purchase order is the system date and not a user date.
Is there someone who knows what I have to do to get a timezone based date on my Purchase Order document date ?
Thanks in advance

Hi Vivek,
Yes, the availability check is working in both the cases, when I create the sales order, I key in the Configurable material code, then do the configuration, after that system does availability check, in both the cases the result of availability check is same with one component marked as a missing part, available date as 20.12.2011.
One more thing if I try to view the Production order at the time of SO creation before saving it, the Production order shows today's date, but when I save the SO, and do Credit release, the actual Production order gives different scheduling date based on customer. Just wondering what could be affecting based on Customer, is there any other field present in Customer master which could alter the date.
I also saw today's scheduling note in some of the cases, but its not coming up in all of the orders created with today's date and moreover the same components are getting scheduled for 20.12.2011 also for diff customer.
I am afraid I can't provide any screenshots for this as am not permitted to publish any screenshots of the client.
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

Similar Messages

  • Date error when scheduling webi reports

    Hi,
    When i click the prompt option in re schedule the scheduled webi report, i got the error "while trying to invoke the method java.util.date.gettime() of a null object loaded from a local variable 'date' "
    The BI version is 4.1 SP03
    The scheduled webi reports failing and got the error as "Unparseable date: "01/01/1900" "
    How to solve this issues?
    Regards,
    Kathir

    This might fix it from the note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1981477
    Create a WebI report that uses a date object in the Query Filters
    Schedule the report
    Reschedule by manually entering date value which shows only date and no timestampExample: 12/31/2007
    Reschedule by selecting date value from the calendar which shows date timestampExample: 12/31/2007 12:00:00 AM
    Create a biar file using the Import Wizard and migrate to BI 4.1 SP2
    BI 4.1 SP2 BILaunchPad, navigate to and Right click the report and go to “History”
    Right click the instance without a timestamp for the date parameter and select “Reschedule”
    Click on “Prompts” on the left menu and note an error is produced:This error occurred: while trying to invoke the method java.util.Date.getTime() of an object loaded from local variable ‘date’
    Attempting to schedule this instance (as Run Now or Reschedule) without selecting a Prompt value fails with the error:  Unparseable date: “12/31/2007”
    Using the instance with a timestamp works as expected

  • 0HRPOSITION master data issue when position is delimited

    We are live with BW HR application and having issue with 0HRPOSITION master data. We are extracting data from SAP using 0HRPOSITION_ATTR datasource. I noticed that data is not maintained correctly in master data tables in BW and giving us incorrect results in reporting. Consider below mentioned scenario:
    Position A created as vacant on 05/01/2008 with start date (BEGDA/ Valid from) as 05/01/2008 and End date (ENDDA/ Valid to) as 12/31/9999 and is vacant. Below mentioned entry is shown under maintain master data for 0HRPOSITION in BW:
    Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
    A 04/30/2008 01/01/1000
    A 12/31/9999 05/01/2008 X
    Position A is now delimited on 09/15/2009 as its no more required. In SAP, position has record only from 04/01/2006 till 09/20/2009 as vacant. When record is extracted in BW, it creates below mentioned entry in master data table.
    Position           Valid To     Valid From     Position Vacant Indicator
        A             04/34/2008    01/01/1000
        A             09/20/2009    05/01/2008                  X
        A             12/31/9999    09/21/2009                  X
    Entry 09/21/2009 - 12/31/9999 is incorrect as position does not exist for this duration and it is neither vacant nor occupied. If we report on 0HRPOSTION with key date as 09/30/2009 , it shows position A as vacant though position no longer exists.
    Has anyone come across this situation. any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Prithi Iyengar
    Edited by: Prithi Iyengar on Dec 23, 2009 3:07 PM

    Hi,
    We do a full update data load for 0HRPOSITION attribute as well as text on daily basis. Attribute change run are scheduled in the process chains. No issues with that..
    In the report, we have the display option of 0HRPOSITION as key and text. Now what is happening is that for most of the positions the text is displayed perfectly but only for those positions which were delimited the text description is not displayed in the report. It is displayed as blank. For eg consider positions A, B, C and D. Say A, B are active positions and C & D have been delimited at a cerain period of time.
    *Master data table is:*
    Position --  Valid_from --  Valid_to  -- Description -- Org. Unit
    A         --  01.05.2008 -- 31.12.9999-- Text1   --- A001
    B         --  01.06.2009 -- 31.12.9999 -- Text2   --- B001
    C         --  01.06.2009 -- 01.08.2009 --- Text3 --- C001
    C         --  02.08.2009 -- 31.12.9999 --  ........   --- ....
    D         --  01.07.2008 -- 15.06.2009 -- Text 4  ---  D001
    D         --  16.06.2009 -- 31.12.9999 --  ........  --- ...
    In report, say i run for date 01.05.2009 to 31.05.2009,
    Position -
    No. of positions
    Key -
    Text  
    A     |  --- Text1  | 1
    B     |  --- Text 2 | 1
    C     |  --- .......... | 1
    D     |  --- .......... |1
    If you notice, the description is maintained for positions C & D in time period 01.05 to 31.05 but the text is not displayed in the report.
    Thanks,
    Edited by: Prithi Iyengar on Dec 23, 2009 5:30 PM

  • Date issue when exporting data to Excel from SSRS report, where date is less than 1/1/1900

    Hi,
    I am using SSRS report to display the data from database. In that data, One of the column is DATE. when I am exporting to Excel all that dates are displaying fine except 1/1/1800 12:00 AM. Instead of 1/1/1800 12:00 AM it is displaying XXXXXXXXXXXXXX values.
    Please help me to fix the issue.
    Please let me know if more clarification required.
    Thanks In advance.

    Hello,
    We can use Cstr() function to convert the Date type data to String data. Suppose we have a field named DateTime, please refer to the expression below:
    =Cstr(Fields!DateTime.Value)
    Then we can get a string type data. There is an article about SSRS expression, you can refer to it.
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms157328.aspx
    If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know.
    Regards,
    Alisa Tang
    Alisa Tang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Date issue when downloading ....

    My Requirement is to display date in Text format  like
    02-21-2009 in
    March 21 , 2009
    I have done it sucesfully through the FM CONVERSION_EXIT_LDATE_OUTPUT
    which  it is sucesfully displaying as March 21 , 2009 but issue coming while downloading !!
    I am using GUI_DOWNLOAD
    where in the excel it is displaying l as  21-Mar-09 
    Please can any one help me to solve this
    Regards
    sas....

    Hi Sas,
    you are using FM CONVERSION_EXIT_LDATE_OUTPUT.
    the import parameter u r getting is in following format of Date " March 21 , 2009 ".
    what u have to do is just pass this import parameter to a variable declared as String  Or a variable declared as character of size 15.
    Example-
    Data : Dat        type string.     " OR
    data :  Dat1(50) type c.
    CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_LDATE_OUTPUT'
      EXPORTING
        INPUT         =  Date1
    IMPORTING
      OUTPUT        = Date2.
    DAT =  Date2.    " or
    Dat1 = Date2.
    Condense  DAT.
    Condense Dat1.
    Now both DAT and Dat1 would be downloaded as u require.
                                              or
    Declare Date2 directly as  " data :  Date2(50) type c "
    and after u get the result condense the same i.e
    Condense date2.
    Regards,
    Akash Rana
    Edited by: AKASH RANA on Aug 7, 2009 2:04 PM

  • Stale Data error when invoking seeded OAF from a custom OAF page

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement in OAF where we have to open a Seeded OAF Page (Install Base) from our Custom Page. We are using the javascript function “openWindow()” to open the page in a new window. When we close the seeded page by clicking seeded page window using the Window-close button and then perform any event on the custom page, we get the Stale Data error as given below.
    Error: Stale Data
    The requested page contains stale data. This error could have been caused through the use of the browser's navigation buttons (the browser Back button, for example).
    Cause:
    The number of displayed records, 2, exceeds the actual number of records, 1, in view object OwqAM.IKNCICOWQDetailVO1. Some of the displayed records may have been deleted.
    Here is the part of code we have tried.
    String destination = "/OA_HTML/RF.jsp?function_id="+Func_Id+"&"+"resp_id="+Resp_id+"&"+"resp_appl_id="+Application_id+"&security_group_id=0&lang_code=US";
    String testDest = "javascript:openWindow(top,'"+destination+"',null,{width:750, height:550},false,'document',null);void(0);";
    OABodyBean bodyBean = (OABodyBean)pageContext.getRootWebBean();
    bodyBean.setOnLoad(testDest);
    Also this issue is encountered only when we open an OAF page in a new window. We also have a functionality where a JSP page is opened on similar lines, but above said navigations do not result in the same error.
    If anyone has come across such a issue and have a resolution, please let me know. Any pointers would be of great help.
    Thanks,
    Mrugesh

    Hi,
    We had tried passing RetainAM = Y and then bouncing apache. Still we were getting the same error.
    We are not facing the STALE DATA issue when we invoke JSP page and oracle forms. It is only when we launch a seeded OAF page from our custom OAF page that we are getting this error.
    Regards,
    Mrugesh

  • Discoverer Viewer not showing correct data when scheduled

    Hi All,
    I have a bit of an ongoing issue and cannot find an answer through Oracle.
    We have an issue that when a cross-tab workbook is run manually in Desktop this returns correct data, when scheduled in desktop it returns correct data in desktop, but when opening the scheduled workbook in viewer, incorrect and irrelevant data is returned
    Here is a little information on the field that is not returning correct data;
    The field is based on a calculation, the calculation (lets call BOB) contains PL/SQL function concatenated with an NVL calculation, this other calculation is a DECODE. I have been playing with changing the content of the BOB calculation, by removing the PL/SQL function and the DECODE calc from BOB and scheduling the report, the data is returned in viewer, in fact i've attempted one without the other and this still does not return the correct data.
    This version of discoverer that is not returning data is V 10.1.2.50.05. I've tested this on a later environment with Discoverer V 10.1.55.26 and the data is returning correctly through the sceduled report in viewer.
    My questions;
    1. Has anyone ever come across something similar to this in version 10.1.2.50.05
    2. Is there any detail available regarding what upgrading to 10.1.55.26 offers?
    3. Know any workaround for using PL/SQL calculations in a scheduled workbook? I am aware that not aggregable items will not be returned in v11 when scheduling workbooks.
    Many thanks in advance for any help.
    Simon

    Bumping this thread
    Thanks
    Si

  • Scheduling Date issue in Assemble to Order Scenario

    Hi Friends,
    I am facing a Weird issue with Production order Scheduled dates created automatically after creation of Sales Order for configurable material.
    Our availability check is set to check  open Purchase orders, for one component the delivery date in the PO is 20.12.2011, currently at the time of creation of SO the availability check shows this component as a missing part and committed date as 20.12.2011.
    Now the issue is that for one type of customers when the SO is saved, the production order gets created with basic start and finish date of 20.12.2011 with a status CRTD PRC MACM SETC.
    But with another customer group it creates the Production order with today's date basic start and finish date, with a status CRTD MSPT PRC  SETC.
    Now since in both the cases the Material is same and also the components are exactly the same, the only difference is the customer, I am unable to make out why it is happening.
    I am basically a MM  Consultant so am unaware if there is any standard setting relating to customer or something relating to that which is causing such  a issue in scheduling date of the Production Order.
    Regards
    Chandra Shekhar

    Hi Vivek,
    Yes, the availability check is working in both the cases, when I create the sales order, I key in the Configurable material code, then do the configuration, after that system does availability check, in both the cases the result of availability check is same with one component marked as a missing part, available date as 20.12.2011.
    One more thing if I try to view the Production order at the time of SO creation before saving it, the Production order shows today's date, but when I save the SO, and do Credit release, the actual Production order gives different scheduling date based on customer. Just wondering what could be affecting based on Customer, is there any other field present in Customer master which could alter the date.
    I also saw today's scheduling note in some of the cases, but its not coming up in all of the orders created with today's date and moreover the same components are getting scheduled for 20.12.2011 also for diff customer.
    I am afraid I can't provide any screenshots for this as am not permitted to publish any screenshots of the client.
    Regards
    Chandra Shekhar

  • Filters on CSWP not working when Scheduling Start Date sets Immediate Value

    In Sharepoint 2013, When users sets value of "Scheduling start date" to "Immediately", the filters does not work correctly.
    I have checked many forums where it is mentioned that If you set scheduling Start date to Immediately, internally the Scheduling Start Date is set to 01/01/1900.
    When i use query in content search webpart as publishing date is between "Scheduling Start Date" and "Scheduling End Date" so it fails. it  does not displays filtered data.
    Please provide some resolution for this issue.
    I have tried using calculated field wherein we can put formula to get value for Immediate value and then use it in Filter expression. but I need another approach related to "Scheduling Start Date" Column. i.e can we remove the Immediate radio button
    or can we restrict user to use specific date only?
    Thanks in Advance.

    This is a new one on me.
    It's a server program to interface with QuickTime and some other problematic services.
    If you use video or 3D in Photoshop Extended, you probably need it.
    Sounds like you are correct in that it has to do wtih Quicktime.  Do you have PS extended?

  • Issue when uploading Sales data from DSO to Cube.

    Dear All,
    I have an issue when I am uploading Sales data from DSO to Cube.  I am using BI 7.0 and I have uploaded all sales document level data to my DSO.  Then I use a transformation rule to calculate the Sales Value when I am doing DTP to cube.  Cube has customer wise aggregation data.
    In DSO I have NetPrice(KF) and Delivered_QTY(KF).  I do a simple multiplication routine in the transformation from DSO to Cube.
    RESULT =   SOURCE_FIELDS-NET_PRICE * SOURCE_FIELDS-DLV_QTY .
    At the moment I use Active Table(With out Archive) on the DSO to get the data since this is my first load.
    Issue is that the figure (Sales Value) in the cube is incorrect. I am getting a very large values which is impossible.
    Can someone please help me.
    Shanka

    Hi,
    are you sure that cube has customer wise aggregated data..since it will always aggregate the values of the key figures for the same set of characters...
    did you checked the values for the key figures as well and if even they are inflated or is the problem with this key figure only.
    During the data load the records may aggregates first for the same values of characters and then multiplication will be happening....if that is the case then you may have to multiply the values before storing it in the data package and then let it aggregate....can be achived through start routine...
    but first verify if other key figures are also having the same issue.
    Thanks
    Ajeet

  • Error when scheduling the infopackage for loading Master data attributes

    Hi,
    Iam getting the following error message when scheduling this Master data Attributes ZIP_0PLANT_ATTR_FULL..( Flexible update of Master data info objects)..
    In Data load monitor error i got this following error message.
    Error message when processing in the Business Warehouse
    Diagnosis
    An error occurred in the SAP BW when processing the data. The error is documented in an error message.
    System response
    A caller 01, 02 or equal to or greater than 20 contains an error meesage.
    Further analysis:
    The error message(s) was (were) sent by:
    Update rules
    Thanks

    HI,
    A caller 01, 02 or equal to or greater than 20 contains an error meesage This is an Idoc error. Please check the Idocs :
    1) SM37 job log (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load) (give request name) and it should give you the details about the request. If its active make sure that the job log is getting updated at frequent intervals.
    Also see if there is any 'sysfail' for any datapacket in SM37.
    2) SM66 get the job details (server name PID etc from SM37) and see in SM66 if the job is running or not. (In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load). See if its accessing/updating some tables or is not doing anything at all.
    3) RSMO see what is available in details tab. It may be in update rules.
    4) ST22 check if any short dump has occured.(In source system if load is from R/3 or in BW if its a datamart load)
    5) Check in SM58 and BD87 for pending tRFCs and IDOCS.
    Once you identify you can rectify the error.
    If all the records are in PSA you can pull it from the PSA to target. Else you may have to pull it again from source infoprovider.
    If its running and if you are able to see it active in SM66 you can wait for some time to let it finish. You can also try SM50 / SM51 to see what is happening in the system level like reading/inserting tables etc.
    If you feel its active and running you can verify by checking if the number of records has increased in the data tables.
    SM21 - System log can also be helpful.
    Thanks,....
    Shambhu

  • In V_V2 the role of Sort Item by date of creation and Sort by delivery date of earliest schedule line for the Sales Orders when Material is out of Stock.

    Hi All,
    Good Morning,
    I am working on once Incident for Re-Scheduling Program V_V2 where the user has requested us to change the criteria for determining the priority of Sales Document based on Sort Item by date of creation. Currently they are using the Sort by delivery date of earliest schedule line in the Variant.
    I would like to know the role these both options play in the Re-Scheduling program V_V2. I would like to know the impact of both of them and the kind of testing I need to perform to study the behaviour of Sales Orders especially when the material is out of stock?
    Please explain with help of examples.
    Thanks
    Farhan.

    This is not that simple that an example would explain how this transaction works but I'll give you some examples.
    Material A has SO1 and SO2 of 10KG each, stock is 20KG so both quantities are confirmed at today. A stock recount determines a reduction to 5KG. This program would change confirmed quantity of SO1 to 5KG and SO2 to 0KG if:
    Creation date of SO1 is older then SO2 in strategy 1
    1st delivery date of SO1 is smaller then SO2 in strategy 2
    Material B has SO1 and SO2 with 10KG each but no quantity confirmed, stock is 0KG. A prodution adds 15KG to stock. The program would change confirmed quantities of SO1 to 10KG and SO2 to 5KG if:
    Creation date of SO1 is older then SO2 in strategy 1
    1st delivery date of SO1 is smaller then SO2 in strategy 2
    I'm assuming a specific configuration, there are many other scenarios possible.
    regards,
    Edgar

  • Date/time stamp issue when transferring vids/pics to computer. Help please.

    Hi, i am having an issue when transferring my vids/pics from my Z2 to my PC.
    On all my previous phones when transferring media to my PC it would be copied and labelled with a date stamp followed by a picture number- an example being 2014-01-13- 0123. This has always made organising and finding my pics/vids in there relavent folders an eay task.
    The problem i am now faced with is when i transfer pics/vids from my Z2.  The pictures are stamped with DSC_0001 for example and the videos with MOV_0001. This means when on my PC i have to examine each file individually to find out its date and time of origin.
    Even more of an headache is everytime i have transferred files from my Z2 and then take more pics/vids and then try to transfer them to my PC the computer will not allow transfer as the stamp on the file i am transferring from my Z2 eg - DSC_0001 is already present on the PC from a previous transfer. This means i have to rename all the PC files first.
    I hope this makes sense and hopefully there is an easy fix.
    I am new to Android and overall i am very happy with the operating system, being a massive improvement generally over my previous phones. Fingers crossed this is down to my lack of knowledge and just involves a settings change somewhere.
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Hi.
    The case you described is right. But it´s not a bug.
    Why don´t you organise your pics/vids on your desktop with picasa for example. There you have many tools, also to rename your files, so that the filename contains the creation date.
    Or you use a cloud solution like dropbox, google+ or amazon clouddrive to sync pics/vids from your phone automatically.
    But never use the built-in sony playmemories. It´s really slow, pics are down-scaled to 1280x720 and vids are not synced. It´s the worst cloud-service for pics I´ve seen.
    Best
    arni

  • I am still having issues when visiting a website and then selecting the back icon and going to days old data instead of current. How do I fix this?

    I am still having issues when visiting a website and then selecting the back icon and browsers is returning old data instead of current. How do I fix this?

    found a solution thank you firefox live chat!!!

  • Date formatting issue when sending excel file via mail

    hello People ,
    I am facing date issue .
    I have inetrnal format of date as yyyymmdd.
    I am converting it into  YYYY-MM-DD.
    CONCATENATE gs_output-end_date(4)
                        gs_output-end_date+4(2)
                        gs_output-end_date+6(2)
                        INTO lv_date_to SEPARATED BY gc_seperator. " gc_separator = '-'.
            gs_output-end_date = lv_date_to.
    I am writing this date and sending an excel file via MAIL . I get date result as MM/DD/YYYY always.
    Now if i pass in YYYY.MM.DD and used the same code where gc_separtor = '.'.
    I get output as YYYY.MM.DD.
    Can any one give me an idea why in format YYYY-MM-DD it is getting overwritten but for yyyy.mm.dd it gives me as yyyy.mm.dd?
    Regards,
    Abhi..
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jul 11, 2011 2:30 PM - subject enhanced

    Thanks , Rohit ,
    I have change my date format in SU01 settings .
    It is now made to [ YYYY-MM-DD] but still '-' is replaced by MM/DD/YYYY.
    Also note that when i format in the following way
       CONCATENATE gs_output-rdadate(4)
                        gs_output-rdadate+4(2)
                        gs_output-rdadate+6(2)
                        INTO lv_rda_date.
    instead of
       CONCATENATE gs_output-rdadate(4)
                        gs_output-rdadate+4(2)
                        gs_output-rdadate+6(2)
                        INTO lv_rda_date sepearted by '-'.
    I get output as YYYYMMDD.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

Maybe you are looking for