1 Graph from two queries

Hi Guys,
I have the following requirement :
Query1 : Incidents open this month
Query 2:Incidents close this month
For the above queries i need to create a Webtemplate : 2 tables from 2 queries + 1 Graph from two queries.
Is it possible to get a single graph from two queries?If so can you enlighten me with the process please?
Cheers,
Stalin

Hi ,
As mentioned by alex please follow the steps below.
1. Create a separate a query (Query3) based on your bothe queryies(Query1 &query2).
2. In the webtemplate Insert table1,table2 and Graph and assign Query1 to Table1 , query2 to table2 and query3 to graph.
if u folow the above steps u will get the require otput

Similar Messages

0PA_C01 different results from two queries on the same cube ....

HI
Can you please help with this problems ...
i am running a two queries with the same restrictions e.g
Sep 08 for employee 22345 ,
In one report it shows the Pay Scale level as A1 , then in the other report it shows Pay scale Scale level as A2 ,
looking at the master data in 0employee , the first report is right ... this is how the data looks like in 0employee
Employee Valid from      To                Pay scale Level
222345       2007-11-03   2008-09-30     A1
222345       2008-10-01   9999-12-31     A2
Can someone please shed some light on this , im thinking it has something to do with update rule but even that is supposed to use last date of the month , not 1st day of the following month. The Cube is a stndard cube 0PA_C01 and the update rule aswell .....

Hi,
Please check in the cube whether the data for the Employee is getting with two values like shown in your question:
Employee Valid from To Pay scale Level
222345 2007-11-03 2008-09-30 A1
222345 2008-10-01 9999-12-31 A2
and also check whether when the data loaded to the cube.
There may be some change in the report structure where the difference is getting may in the column wise or row wise restriction may present.
Please check on the structure of the report also.
With Regards,
Ravi Kanth

Aligning subtotals from two queries.........

I have two queries in a report that are identical except for one entry in the where clause. The two queries each have four groups and are linked by a column in the first group. Both queries return the same columns and a count value. My report displays the totals of each count by group. Each query brings back the expected results however the totals per group do not line up. How do I ensure that the total for each group in both queries line up together?
Thanks in advance
William

Did you check both are same data type and doesn't have trailer spaces for either values?

How to fetch the data into one out parameter from two different queries

Hi,
I have an a problem how to implement condition in above procedure,and scenario is
i have to get the output into one out parameter from two queries.i.e if one query data is null
then i have to pick out data from another query into same out parameter.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE GET_POLICIESMAP_BASEDON_GHPLID(I_COMPANYID IN NUMBER,
I_CARDID IN VARCHAR2,
PR_RESULTSET OUT SYS_REFCURSOR) IS
/* LOC_INSUREDID VARCHAR2(200);
LOC_RELATIONCODE VARCHAR2(200);
LOC_CURRENTPOLICYID VARCHAR2(4000);*/
BEGIN
OPEN PR_RESULTSET FOR
WITH A AS
(SELECT DISTINCT PM.MAINPOLICYID MAINPOLICYID,
id INSUREDID,
RELATIONCODE,
CURRENTPOLICYID
from INSUREDPERSONS IP
LEFT OUTER JOIN POLICIES_RULES_MAPPING PM
ON PM.POLICYID = IP.Currentpolicyid
where EIN IN (SELECT EIN
FROM INSUREDPERSONS ipp
JOIN VW_INSUREDINFO vw
ON IPP.ID = vw.insuredid
and vw.cardid = I_CARDID)
AND IP.CURRENTPOLICYID in
(SELECT ID
from policies
where companyid = I_COMPANYID
and dead = 0
AND POLICYTO > SYSDATE - 1))
SELECT INSUREDID, RELATIONCODE, CURRENTPOLICYID
FROM A
WHERE RELATIONCODE = 0
AND (A.MAINPOLICYID is null or
RELATIONCODE = 0 AND CURRENTPOLICYID = MAINPOLICYID)
UNION
SELECT INSUREDID, RELATIONCODE, CURRENTPOLICYID
FROM A
WHERE RELATIONCODE > 0;
/* HERE I NEED TO GET THE DATA FROM THIS BELOW QUERY INTO SAME OUT PARAMETER
WHEN ABOVE QUERY DATA CONTAINS NULLS */
/* IF PR_RESULTSET IS NULL THEN*/
OPEN PR_RESULTSET FOR
WITH A AS
(SELECT DISTINCT PM.MAINPOLICYID MAINPOLICYID,
id INSUREDID,
RELATIONCODE,
CURRENTPOLICYID
from INSUREDPERSONS IP
LEFT OUTER JOIN POLICIES_RULES_MAPPING PM
ON PM.POLICYID = IP.Currentpolicyid
where FAMILYID IN (SELECT FAMILYID
FROM INSUREDPERSONS ipp
JOIN VW_INSUREDINFO vw
ON IPP.ID = vw.insuredid
and vw.cardid = I_CARDID)
AND IP.CURRENTPOLICYID in
(SELECT ID
from policies
where companyid = I_COMPANYID
and dead = 0
AND POLICYTO > SYSDATE - 1))
SELECT INSUREDID, RELATIONCODE, CURRENTPOLICYID
FROM A
WHERE RELATIONCODE = 0
AND (A.MAINPOLICYID is null or
RELATIONCODE = 0 AND CURRENTPOLICYID = MAINPOLICYID)
UNION
SELECT INSUREDID, RELATIONCODE, CURRENTPOLICYID
FROM A
WHERE RELATIONCODE > 0;
/* END IF;*/
END GET_POLICIESMAP_BASEDON_GHPLID;
Thanks in Advance,
vvr.

SELECT DISTINCT PM.MAINPOLICYID MAINPOLICYID,
                       id              INSUREDID,
                       RELATIONCODE,
                       CURRENTPOLICYID
         from INSUREDPERSONS IP
         LEFT OUTER JOIN POLICIES_RULES_MAPPING PM
           ON PM.POLICYID = IP.Currentpolicyid
        where EIN IN (SELECT EIN
                        FROM INSUREDPERSONS ipp
                        JOIN VW_INSUREDINFO vw
                          ON IPP.ID = vw.insuredid
                         and vw.cardid = I_CARDID)In this code
where EINEIN is a column in INSUREDPERSONS?
and in the sub query below
(SELECT EIN
                        FROM INSUREDPERSONS ipp
                        JOIN VW_INSUREDINFO vw
                          ON IPP.ID = vw.insuredid
                         and vw.cardid = I_CARDID)EIN belongs to INSUREDPERSONS or VW_INSUREDINFO?
Please use Alias as we dont know your table structure.

Plotting x and y axis from two different data

Hi everyone,
I've just started using LabView on my new job. My new task is to create a VI to display a plot an XY graph from two data. How do I actually assign the two different data (X and Y axis resepctively)and plot them out on a same graph??
Please help me out... my job is on the line!

Other may post an example for you.
I will tell how to find this and many other answers.
Do a "Find Examples" from either the LV open screen or from the Help drop down.
LV ships with examples that demonstrate almost every basic operation.
One of the big benifits of these examples is that they work! If they do not, NI is interested in finding which ones do not.
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

How to combine two user prompts into 1 single prompt from two Webi Queries

Hi All,
I developed a single webi report from two different queries on top of 2 BW OLAP universe .
Here I have one user input prompt for each query so I want to combine them into one single user input promt which should pass the user input value to both the Webi queries feeding data to the single webi report.
I found that the webi doc has auto checked merge dimensions enabled but it is not providing combined resluts from both the queries .
Any inputs are greatlt appreciated.
Thanks

Stratos
Firstly ,I appreciate your responses for my two questions.
Both the prompts I am using are from the masterdata and they are similar.data types.I think the transactional data is not available in BW for one of the prompt ,hence I am not getting consistent data.
Anyway will do further investigation in finding similarities and let you know.
Thanks a lot

Adding values from two different queries in one query

Hi,
I have developed a web template by combining 3 queries ,which were created from the same MultiProvider.These queries are having many different selections .Now I need to get the addition of values from these 2 queries into third query.
Is there any way to combine the selections from these queries into one instead of recreating them again.I tried to use global strucuture but not successful.
Kindly let me know is there any workaround for this.
Thanks & Regards,
Raja

Hi ,
You can do it by excel formula.
sheet 1 --> 1st query
sheet2 -->2nd query
sheet3--> put calculations accroding to your requirement based on sheet1 & sheet2 into sheet3.
Regards
Pcrao.

APEX Application accessing data from two different databases

Hi All,
Currently as we all know that APEX Application resides in database and is connected to the schema of that database.
I want APEX Application to be running and accessing data from two different databases. Elaborating my question,
Currently, my APEX Production Application is connected with XXXX Schema of DB1 Database(Where APEX Resides). Now I want to add some pages into this APEX Application for REPORT Purpose, But I want to connect this REPORT APEX Pages to get data from Different Schema YYYY for Database DB2.
Is it possible to configure this scenario?
The reason for doing this is to avoid the REPORT related (adhoc queries) resource utilization effect on Production DB1 Database.
Thanks
Nil

1. If you do the joining of two or more tables in DB1 then all data is pulled over to DB1 and then the join is executed: so more data over the databaselink and more work for DB1. Better keep the joining stuff where the data resides and just pull exactly that data over that you need.
2. Don't know about your different block sizes. Seems a nice question for one of the other forums (DBA or SQL).
3. I mean create synonyms on DB1 for reports VIEWS in DB2.
Hope all is clear!

Merging two Queries in single crystal report lauout

Hi All,
I need to show two reports from two different BEx queries in a single crystal report layout. The queries are independent of each onther and having their selection variables. I have implemented two subreports for two queries in a main report. Now the problem i am facing is, though both the queries are having same slection(Profit Centre and Fiscal Per/Year), they are getting repeated in crystal report parameter screen. I have to enter the values for selections for each report.
Is there any method to merge the selections for both reports if they are same, so that i can enter the selections only once?
Thanks in Adv,
Shubhramukta.

Hi,
I have two queries in BEx having Selections. Query 1 is having selections (Profit centre and Fiscal Per/Yr) and query 2 is having same selections as well(i.e. Profit centre and Fiscal Per/Yr). I have created two reports corresponding to these queries have used as subreports in a main report using Crystal report 2008. When i run the main Crystal report, it automatically prompts for values to be entered, as variables are set at BEx query level.
Though both the reports are having same selection variables, crystal report asks to enter values two times , once for each report, and it is obvious.
Parameters are Crystal parameters.
Is there any method to merge the parameters,is selection variables are same, so that it will ask only once?
Thanks

How to create Analysis from two different subject areas with diff models

Hello,
I have problem with create analysis from two different areas with two different models (Model Star and Snowflakes) build in BI Admin tools.
First Model A = Subject Area A have one fact tables (with measures) and three dimensions tables (Model Star)
Second Model B = Subject Area B have one fact table (no measures) and five dimensions tables (Model Snowflakes).
I'm looking solutions how I can give good results. In this case I can't use UNION, INTERSECT etc., because this models haven't the same number column and data type?
whether it is possible to do in OBIEE?
Please help me
Kind regard
robix

Hi
One thing to understand is that if your are imagining having two Subject Areas (SAs) displayed and then dragging columns from each into your Request without any preparation, then no, that can't be done. You would need to do a join in the BMM layer and expose the column from the second Subject Area in the presentation layer.
But if you indeed interested in UNION (or intersect) queries, then do this:
Build your first query in the first SA in the usual manner. Note the number of columns and the data types of each column.
Now at the bottom of the Criteria workspace, there is a button called "Combine with similar request." Click it.
Select your second SA. You will note that the outlines of the columns in your first query appear. This is to remind you that the number of columns in this second query must be the same as in the first. It also shows the data type of each column for the same reason.
Once you select your columns and your filters, click on result. (Oh, you will also need to decide what kind of combination you want -- click on the dropdown.) The result will be a new Request that has data from both SAs in the query and combined in the manner you select (union, intersect, etc.)
That should give you a start.
http://obiee101.blogspot.in/2010/08/obiee-combine-with-similar-request.html -- Read this link this is good one to understand with screen shots. -- OBIEE 10g
http://oraclebiee11g.blogspot.in/2011/01/querying-across-multiple-subject-areas.html -- OBIEE 11g
Award Points it is useful.
Thanks
satya

Whats the difference between these two queries ? - for tuning purpose

Whats the difference between these two queries ?
I have huge amount of data for each table. its takeing such a long time (>5-6hrs).
here whice one is fast / do we have any other option there apart from listed here....
QUERY 1:
SELECT --<< USING INDEX >>
      field1, field2, field3, sum( case when field4 in (1,2) then 1 when field4 in (3,4) then -1 else 0 end)
    FROM
      tab1 inner join tab2 on condition1 inner join tab3 on condition2 inner join tab4 on conditon3
    WHERE
     condition4..10 and
    GROUP BY
      field1, field2,field3
    HAVING
      sum( case when field4 in (1,2) then 1 when field4 in (3,4) then -1 else 0 end) <> 0;
QUERY 2:
   SELECT --<< USING INDEX >>
      field1, field2, field3, sum( decode(field4, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, -1, 4, -1 ,0))
    FROM
      tab1, tab2, tab3, tab4
    WHERE
     condition1 and
     condition2 and
     condition3 and
     condition4..10
    GROUP BY
      field1, field2,field3
    HAVING
      sum( decode(field4, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, -1, 4, -1 ,0)) <> 0;
[pre]

My feeling here is that simply changing join syntax and case vs decode issues is not going to give any significant improvement in performance, and as Tubby points out, there is not a lot to go on. I think you are going to have to investigate things along the line of parallel query and index vs full table scans as well any number of performance tuning methods before you will see any significant gains. I would start with the Performance Manual as a start and then follow that up with the hard yards of query plans and stats.
Alternatively, you could just set the gofast parameter to TRUE and everything will be all right.
Andre

Report with Two Queries -- Really need your Help Guys

I might be posting duplicate thread but i couldnt found the Q&A that i am looking for.
I am trying to create a report where i have to use two query. Also, with this query i am passing parameter where i ask user to enter Report Month so they can run report by what ever month they want to see data.
Now my Q_2 is duplicate or Q_1 because in my final report layout i have to display fields where i have to compare current_month_data to Previous_month_data. so basically i want user to in put current month date and previous month date and layout look like.
Company_Name Currentmonth_sale previousMonth_Sales ....
Honda $1423.42 $324.42
Toyota $3433 $4255.45
so on....
Now so far i create report manualy and drop two query in to the report but when i trying to create Report Wizard and group by each Company.. it is not giving me the out put that i want. Instead of giving me above out put its give me my Q_! result with each company group and then under that result i have Q_2 result.
so HOW CAN I DISPLAY FIELDS FROM MY Q_2 WITH MY REST OF THE FIELD ON Q_1?????????????????????????
Thank You guys.

Actually, I tried to use Data Link but i am not able to success.
Let me know if I am doing anything wrong . i click on left hand side tool panel where its says DATA LINK. then i click on Q_1 field and then drag the mouse over to Q_2 query with same field name. but its give me an error that Can not link it because of Group data and i have option to choose Yes, NO or Cancel.
Let me know what are the step i need to take in order to link this two queries.
Thank You
keyun

How can I tell if signals from two devices are truly synchronised?

Hi there,
How does one check that signals from two devices (two separate devices in a single X-series chassis) that should be synchronised actually are? I am using a PXIe6361 and PXIe4331 on a PXIe-1073, with Labview 2001 SP1 64-bit. All devices are using the Sample Clock from the 4331 device, and an AI Start Trigger, so they should be synchronised.
I thought that writing the signal data to file and checking the time stamp for each column of data would be the most accurate, but I have been told that timestamps are software created and therefore don't reflect the actual time that the signals were acquired by the hardware. When I do this, the timestamps vary by up to 150ms which is larger than I expected.
If I set the x-axis of the waveform graphs (on the GUI) to "Time" then it appears that the first data sample is taken at different times for the two plots (one plot per device).
If I set the x-axis of the waveform graphs (on the GUI) to "Ignore time stamp" (so that the x-axis just starts from 0 rather than a date-time) then the first data point occurs at "0" for both graphs. However, I'm not sure that this reflects the actual alignment of the signal.
What is the best way to check if signals collected on different devices in the same chassis are actually synchronised?
Thanks,
Claire.

Hi Lynn,
Thanks for your help and for sending the demo.
I understand the concept of how the signals will look if they're not synchronised and your demo shows that nicely. I guess I have been perplexed by someone else telling me that the timestamps in the output file (and following from that I assume timestamps on a waveform graph) do not give an indication of whether signals are synchronised. The reason they gave for this was that the timestamps are manufactured by the software, not the DAQ hardware. They suggested that I put the setting "ignore waveform timestamps" on my waveform graphs, and then check that both signals come in at the same time (i.e. both start at zero), but I'm not convinced about this.
When I use an analog trigger, neither the timestamps in my output file or on the two waveform graphs are synchronised. If I don't use the trigger, then there is far less disparity in the timestamps in the output file. I've attached two output files here, and my VI.
This is my first attempt to synchronise a voltage module and a strain gauge module on an X-series chassis, so I want to make sure that I'm achieving the best synchronisation that I can, and the difference in behaviour with and without the trigger worries me.
Thanks,
Claire.
Attachments:
without trigger.txt ‏5 KB
with trigger.txt ‏6 KB
Multi-Device Synch-Analog Input-Finite Acq-Analog Start_Claire_wDigitalin_12June2012 PTbridge.vi ‏196 KB

Confused on syntax-combine two queries

I have two queries that I'm trying to combine, but can't figure out how to combine them ... successfully!?! The first query is pretty simple in that I'm looking at several fields from two different tables, no big deal.
The second query calculates the years, months, days between two dates that are used in the first query. I'm stumped on how to combine the queries so that they place nice with each other and return results.
Here's the first query ...
select
RTRIM(RTRIM(vpi.LastName) + ', ' + RTRIM(ISNULL(vpi.FirstName,''))) Employee,
convert(varchar,vpi.FromEffectiveDate,101) PositionStart,
convert(varchar,vpi.ToEffectiveDate,101) PositionChange,
convert(varchar,vpi.PositionStartDate,101) PositionStartDate,
vpi.PositionReason, vpi.PositionCode, vpc.PositionCodeDescription
from vhrl_positioninfo vpi
inner join position_codes vpc on vpi.PositionCode = vpc.PositionCode
Here's the second query ...
select
[Age] = convert(varchar, [Years]) + ' Years ' +
          convert(varchar, [Months]) + ' Months ' +
          convert(varchar, [Days]) + ' Days',     *
from
     select
          [Years] = case     when BirthDayThisYear <= Today
                    then datediff(year, BirthYearStart, CurrYearStart)
                    else datediff(year, BirthYearStart, CurrYearStart) - 1
                    end,
          [Months]= case     when BirthDayThisYear <= Today
                    then datediff(month, BirthDayThisYear, Today)
                    else datediff(month, BirthDayThisYear, Today) + 12
                    end,
          [Days]= case     when BirthDayThisMonth <= Today
                    then datediff(day, BirthDayThisMonth, Today)
                    else datediff(day, dateadd(month, -1, BirthDayThisMonth), Today)
                    end,
          Birth = convert(varchar(10) ,Birth, 121),
          Today = convert(varchar(10), Today, 121)
     from
          select     BirthDayThisYear =
               case     when     day(dateadd(year, datediff(year, BirthYearStart, CurrYearStart), Birth)) <> day(Birth)
                    then     dateadd(day, 1, dateadd(year, datediff(year, BirthYearStart, CurrYearStart), Birth))
                    else     dateadd(year, datediff(year, BirthYearStart, CurrYearStart), Birth)
                    end,
               BirthDayThisMonth =
               case      when      day(dateadd(month, datediff(month, BirthMonthStart, CurrMonthStart), Birth)) <> day(Birth)
                    then     dateadd(day, 1, dateadd(month, datediff(month, BirthMonthStart, CurrMonthStart), Birth))
                    else     dateadd(month, datediff(month, BirthMonthStart, CurrMonthStart), Birth)
                    end,
          from
               select     BirthYearStart = dateadd(year, datediff(year, 0, Birth), 0),
                    CurrYearStart = dateadd(year, datediff(year, 0, Today), 0),
                    BirthMonthStart = dateadd(month, datediff(month, 0, Birth), 0),
                    CurrMonthStart = dateadd(month, datediff(month, 0, Today), 0),
               from
                    select birth = convert(datetime, fromeffectivedate) ,
                    Today = case when convert(datetime, toeffectivedate) = '3000-01-01'
                                   THEN convert(datetime, convert(int,getdate()))
else vpi.toeffectivedate
end
     from vHRL_PositionInfo vpi inner join position_codes vpc
                    on vpi.PositionCode = vpc.PositionCode
               ) aaaa
          ) aaa
     ) aa
)a
Here's the sample data ...
vpi table ...
LastName FirstName FromEffectDate ToEffectDate PosStartDate PosReason PosCode
Doe John 2001-10-15 3000-01-01 10-15-2001 Transfer OperPack
Smith Tom 1994-11-28 2001-10-14 1994-11-28 New Hire OperDC
vpc table ...
PosCode PosDescription
OperPack Pack Line Operator
OperDC Descaler Operator
This is what the results should look like ...
John, Doe 2001-10-15 3000-01-01 10-15-2001 Transfer OperPack Pack Line Operator 6 Years 11 Months 16 Days
John, Doe 1994-11-28 2001-10-14 1994-11-28 New Hire OperDC Descaler Operator 6 Years 6 Months 19 Days
I know the date calculation piece adds 5 additional fields to the end, but they are not needed for the final report. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you! Jena

Your query suggests you're not using Oracle. Please post in your relevant database forum.

Why are two queries better than one

I'm trying to help out our developers who are struggling with the performance of a very simple select statmenent that for some reason is exhibiting some very inexplicable results.
I'll show the SQL as a single statement first.....
select * from transaction1 t where t.hid in (select distinct h.hid from history1 h,filter1 f where h.fid = f.fid and f.match='value');
transaction 1 has 250k records, history1 has about 100k as does filter1. We know generally the subselect will only return a total of half a dozen or less records (only 1 in our testing here).
Running the above query takes around 7 seconds.
Changing this to a with clause.....
WITH a as (select distinct h.hid from history1 h,filter1 f where h.fid = f.fid and f.match='value') select * from transaction1 t where t,hid in (select a.hid from a);
and the runtime drops to 3 seconds. But then re-running the first statement again also now takes 3 seconds (so I guess there's some caching going on there).
Now what really puzzles is if we split this into two queries.....
select distinct h.hid from history1 h,filter1 f where h.fid = f.fid and f.match='value';
This takes .1 of a second,
select * from transaction1 t where t.hid in (12345);
And this takes .1 of a second.
So why when run seperately are they so fast, yet combined they take so long. I'm a bit baffled by this. We've rewritten the same SQL in half a dozen different ways with the same result and also done the same thing with other tables as well. Is it an optimisation issue?

Appologies for not following protocol, my first time posting on here.
Oracle 10g clustered.
We have limited access as it's a customers server, but the explain plan comes back as....
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 898894568
| Id | Operation            | Name              | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|Time     |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |                   | 49553 |    37M| 7075   (2)|00:01:25 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI|                   | 49553 |    37M| 7075   (2)|00:01:25 |
|   2 |   VIEW               | VW_NSO_1          | 26131 |   331K|   476   (4)|00:00:06 |
|* 3 |    HASH JOIN         |                   | 26131 |   791K|   476   (4)|00:00:06 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|* 4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| FILTER1           | 26131 |   484K|   246   (4)|00:00:03 |
|   5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| HISTORY1          |   104K| 1225K|   227   (3)|00:00:03 |
|   6 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | TRANSACTION1      |   199K|   150M| 6593   (1)|00:01:20 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - access("T"."TID"="$nso_col_1")
   3 - access("H"."HID"="F"."ID")
   4 - filter("F"."MATCH"='value')
20 rows selectedI'll admit, I'm not completely clear on what I'm reading here, other than the fact there are some big differences in the timing values
We don't have privaleges to run trace, so I'm a bit stuffed there as I'm on the clients site, however I will get my developers to try this on our local server.
Edited by: user1410957 on 15-Sep-2009 06:14

1 Graph from two queries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for