25 minutes to run a query then returns no rows

Hi,
Just wondered if someone could explain why the following query takes 25 minutes to run and then returns no rows. Sorry if this seems obvious to you but I'm still learning Oracle and I'd really appreciate an answer.
(this is a trace taken through the application so it shows the bind variables - this much I've learnt! )
Thanks
Mark
Select /*+ INDEX(DAE_ GACCENTRYD_DAE0) */ DAE_.ROWID, DAE_.*
From IDIS.GACCENTRYD DAE_ Where DAE_.ACC_0 = :1
Order by DAE_.TYP_0,DAE_.NUM_0,DAE_.LIG_0
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 30.32 1528.03 192062 354581 0 0
total 3 30.32 1528.04 192062 354581 0 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 30
Rows Row Source Operation
0 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GACCENTRYD
3792690 INDEX FULL SCAN (object id 189011)

Select /*+ INDEX(DAE_ GACCENTRYD_DAE0) */           <-- check what are the columns involved in this index
         DAE_.ROWID, DAE_.*
    From IDIS.GACCENTRYD DAE_
   Where DAE_.ACC_0 = :1
Order by DAE_.TYP_0,DAE_.NUM_0,DAE_.LIG_0
1. check what are your columns in your index GACCENTRYD_DAE0
2. the columns involved on your index GACCENTRYD_DAE0 should also be used in your WHERE predicates
3. if no columns are used in your WHERE predicates that are involved in your index GACCENTRYD_DAE0 try to removed the hint

Similar Messages

Query to return ALL rows even those with zero counts

Hi,
The following query will return only those rows that have a non zero count value:
select c.id, a.name, count(*) as XYZ from CON c, CUST a
where c.help !='1' and (c.id = a.id) group by c.id, a.name order by c.id;
The results are:
1 ME 3
3 YOU 4
What i want is to return all rows in CUST and the count, XYZ, that correspond to each row in CUST that matches the whare condition above, even if the count is zero.
ie
1 ME 3
2 WE 0
3 YOU 4
Can this be done?

You may want to get the counts then do the outer join. If you simply count with an outer join you will get 1 for 'WE' because there is a row in the cust table with 'WE'. This may work for you;
with
cust as (
   select 1 id, 'ME' name from dual union all
   select 2 id, 'YOU' name from dual union all
   select 3 id, 'WE' name from dual),
con as (
   select 1 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 1 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 1 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 2 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 2 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 2 id, '2' help from dual union all
   select 2 id, '2' help from dual)
-- end of test data
select a.id, a.name, nvl(c.cnt,0) xyz
from cust a,
   (select id, help, count(*) cnt
   from con
   where help !='1'
   group by id, help) c
where a.id = c.id(+)

Query not returning any rows?

hi experts,
My query running long but not returning any result. i have data , no locks on the tables.
i have bigger ( hardware ) database on different server , where I can get results with same query.
Can you tell me what are the DB settings i have to look at to resolve this issue?
( any sql query that can monitor these parameters ?)
(the tabels involved in this query has 33milliions, 2millions, 7 milllions )
Thanks ..
Edited by: 642877 on Sep 21, 2011 6:46 PM

Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
"CORE 11.2.0.2.0 Production"
TNS for Solaris: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
==========================================================
Plan hash value: 3185710999
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3 | 423 | 24592 (2)| 00:05:45 | | |
| 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 3 | 423 | 24592 (2)| 00:05:45 | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 423 | 24591 (2)| 00:05:45 | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 345 | 24585 (2)| 00:05:45 | | |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 84 | 21916 (2)| 00:05:07 | | |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 67 | 21915 (2)| 00:05:07 | | |
| 7 | PARTITION LIST ALL | | 2 | 60 | 21913 (2)| 00:05:07 | 1 | 11 |
|* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ART_CRDT_ACCT_FACT | 2 | 60 | 21913 (2)| 00:05:07 | 1 | 11 |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ART_PRTFOL_GRP_DIM | 1 | 37 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 10 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | ART_PRTFOL_GRP_DIM_INDEX1 | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | W_MONTH_D | 1 | 17 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
|* 12 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | UQ_W_MONTH_D | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 13 | PARTITION LIST ITERATOR | | 3 | 93 | 2669 (2)| 00:00:38 | KEY | KEY |
|* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ACCT_CLTRL_RLTNP | 3 | 93 | 2669 (2)| 00:00:38 | KEY | KEY |
|* 15 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | UQ_ART_CLTRL_DIM | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
| 16 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CLTRL_DIM | 1 | 26 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Restrictive query always returns no rows

I am trying to run a query with a where clause, but I'm always getting no rows returned. I am obviously overlooking something. Here are my scripts that are on the employee dept tables.
The scripts run without any errors and when I do a 'select * from dept_xml' I get the complete XML output. However if I run the query
select * from dept_xml
where existsNode(sys_nc_rowinfo$, '/DEPT_T[DEPTNO=40]') = 1
no rows returned
WHY??
drop type emp_t force
drop type emplist_t force
drop type dept_t force
drop type deptlist_t force
drop type depts_t force
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE emp_t AS OBJECT
EMPNO NUMBER(4),
ENAME VARCHAR2(10),
JOB VARCHAR2(9),
MGR NUMBER(4),
HIREDATE DATE,
SAL NUMBER(8,2),
COMM NUMBER(8,2)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE emplist_t AS TABLE OF emp_t
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE dept_t AS OBJECT
DEPTNO NUMBER(2),
DNAME VARCHAR2(14),
LOC VARCHAR2(13),
EMPS EMPLIST_T
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE deptlist_t AS TABLE OF dept_t
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE depts_t AS OBJECT
DEPTS DEPTLIST_T
begin
dbms_xmlschema.deleteSchema('http://www.oracle.com/depts.xsd', 4);
dbms_xmlschema.registerSchema('http://www.oracle.com/depts.xsd', dbms_xmlschema.generateschema('SCOTT','DEPT_T'),TRUE,FALSE);
end;
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW dept_xml OF XMLTYPE
XMLSCHEMA "http://www.oracle.com/depts.xsd" ELEMENT "DEPT_T"
WITH OBJECT ID (sys_nc_rowinfo$.extract('/DEPT_T/DEPTNO').getNumberVal())
AS
SELECT dept_t(d.deptno,
d.dname,
d.loc,
cast(multiset(SELECT emp_t(e.empno,
e.ename,
e.job,
e.mgr,
e.hiredate,
e.sal,
e.comm)
FROM emp e
WHERE e.deptno = d.deptno)
AS emplist_t))
FROM dept d;

#1. I would strong recommend using the SQL/XML operators (XMLElement, XMLForest etc)to define your view, rather than creating SQL Types. We will be focusing future development on improving the performance and functionality of the SQL/XML operators, so these operators are now the preferred approach.
#2 Please post the XML document that is generated by teh view. I suspect that the XPATH expression does not match the generated docuemnt.

Simple join question - my query is returning unwanted rows ...

My SQL select is returning more rows that I want it to return. The table that I'm joining on has multiple rows per CaseId, and I'm only interested in getting one...
table1
CaseId     column1     column2
8     elmo          foz
9     foo          bar
10     fuz          baz
11     fuy          bay
table2
CaseId     Seq     column8     column9
8     1     choc          strawberry
9     1     banana          orange
9     2     do          re
10     1     me          fa
So a SQL select like:
select t1.CaseId, t1.column1, t1.column2, t2.column8
FROM table1 t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 t2
ON t1.CaseId = t2.CaseId
returns data like:
t1.CaseId     t1.column1     t1.column2     t2.column8
8          elmo          foz          choc
9          foo          bar          banana
9          fuz          baz          do
I want the SQL select to return only one row for each row that’s in table1; CaseId of 9 should have only one row in the SQL select results.
The table2 has multiple rows, because of the Seq column. How can I formulate the SQL select to join on table2 using CaseId and the max Seq value?
Thank you!

Untested..
with t1 AS
        (SELECT *
           FROM (SELECT table2.*,
                        ROW_NUMBER ()
                           OVER (PARTITION BY caseid ORDER BY seq DESC)
                           r
                   FROM table2)
          WHERE r = 1)
SELECT t1.CaseId,
       t1.column1,
       t1.column2,
       t2.column8
FROM table1 t1 LEFT OUTER JOIN t1 t2 ON t1.CaseId = t2.CaseId;OUTPUT:
CASEID     COLUMN1     COLUMN2     COLUMN8
8     elmo     foz     choc
9     foo     bar     do
10     fuz     baz     me
11     fuy     bay     Cheers,
Manik.

Wlconfig, running a query then embedded create

using WLS 8.1....
Unfortunately the query child task to the wlconfig task does not support child create tasks which causes a problem for me when configuring with Ant. What I want to do is to create a WTCServer defition then afterwards in a seperate wlconfig sub-task query after that WTCServer defition and create a child WTCExport defition. Can one issue a create task directly for WTCExport types and stear the creation into an WTCServer defition?
/ Matthew

Hi,
I am trying to do the same thing for JMSServer and JMSQueue objects, in WLS 8.1 SP4
I want to know how I can add a new JMSQueue to an existing JMSServer, i.e. execute these 2 operations in different <wlconfig> tasks ?
If anyone ahas an idea, thanks

Query to return separate rows for date range including NULLs

I'm trying to write a query that will return all customers from table 1. Table 1 also provides a start date and an end date that may be different for different customers. Left join with Table 2 provides all matches and NULL if NO matches.
If there is any match at all, I do not get the NULLs for other dates. There should be a match for each date from start to end. How can I write the code so that my return will loop thru each date and provide the match or NULL?

Sorry. I am somewhat new to this and am not sure what you are requesting. I receive a return of all customers with the code below but if customer 1 has a start date of 1/1/15 and a stop date of 1/5/15 and a document exists for 1/1/15 and 1/3/15
I do not receive the rows with NUL for 1/2/15, 1/4/15, and 1/5/15 which is what I'm trying to accomplish. If there is no match at all, I only receive the one row with NULL and I would like to see a row for each date from start to stop.
SELECT T1.IDNumber,T1.StartDate,T1.StopDate,T3.SignDateTime
FROM
Table1 T1
INNER
JOIN Table2
T2
ON
T1.CustID
= T2.CustID
LEFT
JOIN Table3
T3
ON
T1.CustID
= T3.CustID
WHERE
T1.StartDate
> '2015-01-20 00:00:00.000'
AND
(T3.ReportID
IN ('DOC1',
'DOC2',
'DOC3') OR
T3.ReportID
IS NULL)
AND
T2.YesNo
= 'Y'

Query to return multiple rows

Hi all,
I've a requirement where in I've to get multiple rows from a query.
The resultset should be something like this:
SELECT A
FROM dual;
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Thanks in anticipation
RK Raju

I'm not completely certain I understand the question. Just in case you're asking for something as simple as this ...
select rownum from all_objects where rownum <= 10;You didn't say what version you were using either (shame on you). You could use a collection or a pipeline depending on your version ...
create or replace type ttab_number is table of number;
create or replace function f_collection
    return ttab_number is
    tab_number ttab_number := ttab_number();
begin
    for i in 1 .. 10 loop
        tab_number.extend;
        tab_number(tab_number.count) := i;
    end loop;
    return tab_number;
end f_collection;
select *
from table(f_collection)
create or replace function f_pipeline
    return ttab_number
    pipelined is
begin
    for i in 1 .. 10 loop
        pipe row(i);
    end loop;
    return;
end f_pipeline;
show errors
select *
from table(f_pipeline)

SQL query that returns exclusive rows from groups

I'm using modified scott/tiger data for this.
I've got two tables
DEPT_X
DEPTNO     DNAME             LOC     CODE_ID     SUB_DEPTNO
10     ACCOUNTING     NEW YORK 111     101
10     SALES             ATWN      111     102
10     SALES             BTWN      112     103
20     RESEARCH     DALLAS      111     201
20     RESEARCH     CTWN      111     202
30     SALES             CHICAGO      111     301
40     OPERATIONS     BOSTON      112     401and
BI_PD
CODE_ID     PD_TYPE     BI_TYPE
111          -1
112     -1     I want to write a query that joins the code_ids of the two tables and lists out either only the records from DEPT_X who's code_ids have a -1 in the PD_TYPE(112) column and none of the code_ids that have a -1 in the BI_TYPE(111) column for each department or if that department has code_ids for the BI_TYPE (111), list out those rows. So for Deptno 10 you'll only get the row with SUB_DEPTNO = 103. But if for that DEPTNO= 20 you'll get the rows for both SUB_DEPTNO = 201 and 202.
So the result should look like
DEPTNO   SUB_DEPTNO
10          103
20          201
20          202
30          301.
Basically I just want rows from each department that have code_ids = 111 not to show up if there are code_ids = 112.
What is the query to do this?
Message was edited by:
user623359
Message was edited by:
user623359
Message was edited by:
user623359
Message was edited by:
user623359
Message was edited by:
user623359

One way could be:
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
SQL> with dept_x as (
2      select 10 deptno, 'ACCOUNTING' dname, 'NEW YORK' loc, 111 code_id, 101 sub_deptno from dual
union all
3      select 10, 'SALES', 'ATWN', 111, 102 from dual union all
4      select 10, 'SALES', 'BTWN', 112, 103 from dual union all
5      select 20, 'RESEARCH', 'DALLAS', 111, 201 from dual union all
6      select 20, 'RESEARCH', 'CTWN', 111, 202 from dual union all
7      select 30, 'SALES', 'CHICAGO', 111, 301 from dual union all
8      select 40, 'OPERATIONS', 'BOSTON', 112, 401 from dual ),
9 --
10 bi_pd as(
11      select 111 code_id, null pd_type, -1 bi_type from dual union all
12      select 112, -1, null from dual),
13 --
14 t as(
15      select a.deptno,a.sub_deptno from dept_x a, bi_pd b
16      where a.code_id = b.code_id and b.pd_type = -1)
17 --
18 select a.deptno,a.sub_deptno
19 from dept_x a, bi_pd b
20 where a.code_id = b.code_id and b.bi_type = -1 and
21        (a.deptno) not in (select deptno from t)
22 union
23 select deptno,sub_deptno from t;
    DEPTNO SUB_DEPTNO
        10        103
        20        201
        20        202
        30        301
        40        401

Oracle 11g:Query to return only 1 to 1 relationship & random selection

Hi
I have a complex query to modify but I have below the sample tables and data with only very few fields(only affected fields).
Query based on 2 tables b_test and s_test.
Pls see below.
create table b_test(building_id number not null,invalid varchar2(1));
create table s_test(sub_building_id number not null,building_id number ,invalid varchar2(1),sequence_no number);
insert into b_test values (1000,'N');
insert into b_test values(2000,'N');
insert into b_test values(3000,'N');
commit;
insert into s_test values(1,1000,'N',90);
insert into s_test values(2,1000,'N',91);
insert into s_test values(3,1000,'N',92);
insert into s_test values(4,1000,'Y',93);
insert into s_test values(5,NULL,'N',NULL);
insert into s_test values(1,2000,'N',94);
insert into s_test values(2,2000,'N',95);
insert into s_test values(3,2000,'N',96);
insert into s_test values(4,2000,'N',97);
insert into s_test values(5,2000,'N',98);
insert into s_test values(6,NULL,'N',NULL);
insert into s_test values(10,3000,'N',99);
insert into s_test values(11,3000,'N',100);
commit;The query below returns all rows required:(also see results:)
select b.building_id,b.invalid,s.sub_building_id,s.sequence_no from b_test b,
(select * from s_test where invalid='N') s
where b.building_id = s.building_id(+)
and b.invalid='N'
Results:
BUILDING_ID INVALID      SUB_BUILDING_ID     SEQUENCE_NO
1000              N     1                     90
1000             N     2                     91
1000             N     3                     92
2000             N     1                     94
2000             N     2                     95
2000             N     3                     96
2000             N     4                     97
2000             N     5                     98
3000             N     10                      99
3000             N     11                     100Now there are 2 requirements:
1)How can the above query be changed so that 1:1 relationship if sub_building_id is returned?i.e For 1 building_id, only show 1 sub_building(This could be a random selection)
(Pls help with query)
The results would be like
BUILDING_ID INVALID     SUB_BUILDING_ID     SEQUENCE_NO
1000               N     1                      90
2000               N     1                      94
3000               N     11                     1002)How can the same SEQUENCE_NO be shown for all sub_buildings for the same building? (Pls help with query)
The results will be:
BUILDING_ID INVALID     SUB_BUILDING_ID     SEQUENCE_NO
1000             N     1                       90
1000             N     2                       90
1000             N     3                       90
2000             N     1                       94
2000              N     2                       94
2000             N     3                       94
2000             N     4                       94
2000             N     5                       94
3000             N     10                       99
3000             N     11                       99Many thanks!
Edited by: Krithi on 08-Nov-2012 08:48
Edited by: Krithi on 08-Nov-2012 08:55

Krithi wrote:
Hi
I have a complex query to modify but I have below the sample tables and data with only very few fields(only affected fields).
Query based on 2 tables b_test and s_test.
Pls see below.
create table b_test(building_id number not null,invalid varchar2(1));
Thanks for posting the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, and your existing query; that's very helpful.
The query below returns all rows required:(also see results:)
select b.building_id,b.invalid,s.sub_building_id,s.sequence_no from b_test b,
(select * from s_test where invalid='N') s
where b.building_id = s.building_id(+)
and b.invalid='N'
Results:
BUILDING_ID INVALID      SUB_BUILDING_ID     SEQUENCE_NO
1000              N     1                     90
1000             N     2                     91
1000             N     3                     92
2000             N     1                     94
2000             N     2                     95
2000             N     3                     96
2000             N     4                     97
2000             N     5                     98
3000             N     10                      99
3000             N     11                     100
When I run your query, I get NULL for sequence_no on the last 2 rows, where building_id=3000. The numbers 99 and 100 don't seem to occur in either table. Did you post the worng sample data and/or results?
>
Now there are 2 requirements:
1)How can the above query be changed so that 1:1 relationship if sub_building_id is returned?i.e For 1 building_id, only show 1 sub_building(This could be a random selection)
(Pls help with query) Here's one way:
WITH       got_r_num AS
     SELECT sub_building_id
     ,     building_id
     ,     sequence_no
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY building_id
                               ORDER BY         sequence_no
                       )         AS r_num
     FROM    s_test
     WHERE     invalid     = 'N'
SELECT    b.building_id
,       b.invalid
,       r.sub_building_id
,       r.sequence_no
FROM             b_test     b
LEFT OUTER JOIN      got_r_num r ON r.building_id = b.building_id
WHERE     NVL ( r.r_num
           , 1
           )          = 1
ORDER BY b.building_id
;This is called a Top-N Query , because we're picking N items (N = 1 in this case) from the top of an ordered list. What makes one item the "top", and another one "lower"? That's determined by the analytic ORDER BY clause, in this case
ORDER BY      sequence_noThat means the row with the lowest sequence_no (for each building_id) will get r_num=1. If you want a random row from that building_id to be chosen as #1, then you can change the analytic ORDER BY clause to
ORDER BY      dbms_random.valueYou can ORDER BY anything you like, even a constant, but you must have an analytic ORDER BY clause. ROW_NUMBER requires an analytic ORDER BY clause.
The results would be like
BUILDING_ID INVALID     SUB_BUILDING_ID     SEQUENCE_NO
1000               N     1                      90
2000               N     1                      94
3000               N     11                     100
Again, I don't see where the 100 comes from. The results I get are:
BUILDING_ID I SUB_BUILDING_ID SEQUENCE_NO
       1000 N               1          90
       2000 N               1          94
       3000 N              11
2)How can the same SEQUENCE_NO be shown for all sub_buildings for the same building? (Pls help with query)
SELECT    b.building_id
,       b.invalid
,       s.sub_building_id
,       MIN (s.sequence_no) OVER ( PARTITION BY s.building_id)
                        AS seq_no
FROM             b_test b
LEFT OUTER JOIN      s_test s ON s.building_id = b.building_id
                            AND s.invalid      = 'N'
The results will be:
BUILDING_ID INVALID     SUB_BUILDING_ID     SEQUENCE_NO
1000             N     1                       90
1000             N     2                       90
1000             N     3                       90
2000             N     1                       94
2000              N     2                       94
2000             N     3                       94
2000             N     4                       94
2000             N     5                       94
3000             N     10                       99
3000             N     11                       99
Again, I don't see where you get sequence_no = 99. The results I get are:
BUILDING_ID I SUB_BUILDING_ID     SEQ_NO
       1000 N               1         90
       1000 N               2         90
       1000 N               3         90
       2000 N               1         94
       2000 N               2         94
       2000 N               5         94
       2000 N               3         94
       2000 N               4         94
       3000 N              10
       3000 N              11Edited by: Frank Kulash on Nov 8, 2012 12:12 PM
Added explanation and results
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Nov 8, 2012 12:28 PM
It looks like you cahnged your sample data from
insert into s_test values(10,3000,'N',NULL);
insert into s_test values(11,3000,'N',NULL);to
insert into s_test values(10,3000,'N',99);
insert into s_test values(11,3000,'N',100);The queries I posted are niow getting 99, like you requested.

IPTObjectManager.Query not returning correct result (Java)

Hi,
I am having a problem with the IPTObjectManager.Query method. The code is given below. The issue I am having is, that when I search for a community in a specific folder not results are returned. However if I search in all folders (using -1 as the second parameter to the method) it returns multiple communities including the one I need. Anyone else had the same issue with this??
// THIS CODE WORKS AND RETURN MULTIPLE COMMUNITIES
// THE hotelCode VARIABLE IS A STRING VARIABLE CONTAINING A VALUE
// WHICH IS THE COMMUNITY NAME.
// Create a ObjectManager object
IPTObjectManager objectManager = session.GetObjectManagers(ObjectClass.Community.toInteger());
// define the query based on the passed string
Object[][] vQueryFilter = {
     new Object[]{new Integer(PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME)},
     new Object[]{new Integer(PT_FILTEROPS.PT_FILTEROP_CONTAINS)},
     new Object[]{hotelCode}};
// Run the query and return results
IPTQueryResult ptQueryResult = objectManager.Query(
     PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_ALL, -1, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME, 0, -1, vQueryFilter);
// THIS CODE DOES NOT WORK. I AM PASSING IS THE FOLDER ID OF THE
// FOLDER WHICH CONTAINS THE COMMUNITY
// Create a ObjectManager object
IPTObjectManager objectManager = session.GetObjectManagers(ObjectClass.Community.toInteger());
// define the query based on the passed string
Object[][] vQueryFilter = {
     new Object[]{new Integer(PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME)},
     new Object[]{new Integer(PT_FILTEROPS.PT_FILTEROP_CONTAINS)},
     new Object[]{hotelCode}};
// Run the query and return results
IPTQueryResult ptQueryResult = objectManager.Query(
     PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_ALL, 303, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME, 0, -1, vQueryFilter);

I don't know about G6, however in version 5 there does not appear an easy way of doing it. I guess the "easiest" way would be to query sub-folders first, build and array of their ids, and then query for communities in those folders. This is using server API. Something like this (.NET):
publicvoidGetFolderCommunities(intfolderId){    IPTAdminFolder folder =this.session.GetAdminCatalog().OpenAdminFolder(folderId, false);    IPTQueryResult qr =folder.QuerySubfolders(PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_ALL, [b]1, null, 0, -1, newobject[][] {             newobject[] { PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_FOLDER_FOLDERTYPE }, newobject[] { PT_FILTEROPS.PT_FILTEROP_EQ } , newobject[] { PT_ADMIN_FOLDER_TYPES.PT_ADMIN_FOLDER_TYPE_COMMUNITYFOLDER } } ); int[] folderIds =newint[qr.RowCount()]; Console.WriteLine("------ sub-folders for communities -------"); for(inti =0; i <qr.RowCount(); i++) {        intobjectId =qr.ItemAsInt(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_OBJECTID);        stringobjectName =qr.ItemAsString(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME);        intparentFolderId =qr.ItemAsInt(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_FOLDER_PARENTFOLDERID);        folderIds[i] =objectId; Console.WriteLine("{0}: {1}; parent: {2}", objectId, objectName, parentFolderId); } qr =this.session.GetCommunities().Query( PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_ALL, -1, (object) null, 0, -1, newobject[][] {            newobject[] { PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_FOLDERID }, newobject[] { PT_FILTEROPS.PT_FILTEROP_IN } , newobject[] { folderIds } } ); Console.WriteLine("------ communities from sub-folders -------"); for(inti =0; i <qr.RowCount(); i++) {        intobjectId =qr.ItemAsInt(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_OBJECTID);        stringobjectName =qr.ItemAsString(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME);        int parentFolderId =qr.ItemAsInt(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_FOLDERID);        Console.WriteLine("{0}: {1}; folder: {2}", objectId, objectName, parentFolderId); }}
Or you could use EDK RPC search. Again, in .NET:
publicvoidSearchForCommunities(intfolderId){ IPortalSearchRequest searchRequest =this.ptSession.GetSearchFactory().CreatePortalSearchRequest(); searchRequest.SetObjectTypesToSearch(newObjectClass[] { ObjectClass.Community }); searchRequest.SetDocFoldersToSearch(newint[] {}, true); searchRequest.SetAdminFoldersToSearch(newint[] { folderId}, true); searchRequest.SetResultsCount(0, 100); searchRequest.SetResultsOrderBy(PortalField.OBJECT_ID); searchRequest.SetFieldsToReturn(newPlumtreeField[] {}); searchRequest.SetQuery("*"); ISearchResponse searchResponse =searchRequest.Execute(); intreturnedMatches =searchResponse.GetReturnedCount(); ISearchResultSet resultSet =searchResponse.GetResultSet(); IEnumerator enumerator =resultSet.GetResults(); while(enumerator.MoveNext()) { ISearchResult result =(ISearchResult) enumerator.Current; Console.WriteLine( result.GetFieldAsInt(PortalField.OBJECT_ID) +": "+ result.GetFieldAsString(PlumtreeField.NAME) ); }}
Ruslan.

SQL Query returning no rows, please help!!

I have a table that contains user audits for a particular procedures alongwith the date stamp. Now, I want to list all the procedures not accessed by the users within the last 6 months. Or, all the procedures that have not been used/accessed during the last 6 months.
This is what I am trying but is not returning any rows:
SELECT DISTINCT proc_name,
TRUNC (entry_date)
FROM log_web
WHERE proc_name NOT IN (SELECT proc_name
FROM log_web
WHERE TRUNC (entry_date) > TRUNC (SYSDATE - 180))
ORDER BY 2 DESC
Please advise.
Thank you in advance.

Two possibilities leap to mind.
First, are you sure that there are any prodcedures not accessed in the last six months?
Second, is there a chance that there could be records with a null value in proc_name? If the sub-query used in a NOT IN predicate returns even one null value, the query will return no rows.
Does this return rows?
SELECT DISTINCT proc_name, TRUNC(entry_date)
FROM log_web
WHERE proc_name NOT IN (SELECT proc_name
                        FROM log_web
                        WHERE TRUNC (entry_date) > TRUNC (SYSDATE - 180) and
                              proc_name IS NOT NULL)
ORDER BY 2 DESCJohn

Query not returning all data

All,
I have 2 dimension tables and 1 logical fact table
a01_bi_agency_interest_dim
a01_bi_dsk_central_file_dim
tier2_facts
1 Complex Join in Physical Layer
A01_BI_AGENCY_INTEREST_DIM.MASTER_AI_ID = A01_BI_DSK_CENTRAL_FILE_DIM.MASTER_AI_ID AND A01_BI_AGENCY_INTEREST_DIM.INT_DOC_ID = A01_BI_DSK_CENTRAL_FILE_DIM.INT_DOC_ID
2 Logical Joins in BMM
A01_BI_AGENCY_INTEREST_DIM to tier2_facts (inner, 0 or 1 to many)
A01_BI_DSK_CENTRAL_FILE_DIM to tier2_facts (inner, 0 or 1 to many)
Query only returns 1 row. Should return many rows, I have checked the data through sql queries in SqlPlus.
Query from advanced tab.
SELECT A01_BI_AGENCY_INTEREST_DIM.MASTER_AI_NAME saw_0,
A01_BI_DSK_CENTRAL_FILE_DIM.INT_DOC_ID saw_1
FROM TIER2 ORDER BY saw_0, saw_1
Any help would be appreciated. I am missing something, but doesn't make sense.
Thanks,
Kathy

It doesn't do the join and I get 1 record returned with zero's for both values. Why doesn't it pick up my join?
-------------------- SQL Request:
SET VARIABLE QUERY_SRC_CD='Report';SELECT A01_BI_AGENCY_INTEREST_DIM.MASTER_AI_ID saw_0, A01_BI_DSK_CENTRAL_FILE_DIM.INT_DOC_ID saw_1 FROM TIER2 ORDER BY saw_0, saw_1
+++300000:300004:----2012/06/01 12:44:51
-------------------- General Query Info:
Repository: Star, Subject Area: TIER2, Presentation: TIER2
+++300000:300004:----2012/06/01 12:44:51
-------------------- Cache Hit on query:
Matching Query: SET VARIABLE QUERY_SRC_CD='Report';SELECT A01_BI_AGENCY_INTEREST_DIM.MASTER_AI_ID saw_0,
A01_BI_DSK_CENTRAL_FILE_DIM.INT_DOC_ID saw_1
FROM TIER2 ORDER BY saw_0, saw_1
Created by: Administrator
+++300000:300004:----2012/06/01 12:44:51
-------------------- Query Status: Successful Completion
+++300000:300004:----2012/06/01 12:44:51
-------------------- Physical Query Summary Stats: Number of physical queries 1, Cumulative time 0, DB-connect time 0 (seconds)
+++300000:300004:----2012/06/01 12:44:51
-------------------- Rows returned to Client 1
+++300000:300004:----2012/06/01 12:44:51
-------------------- Logical Query Summary Stats: Elapsed time 0, Response time 0, Compilation time 0 (seconds)

Query returns more row than expected

1. select * from view_name where col1 = 'value1' returns 12 rows
2. select * from (view script) where col1 = 'value1' returns 24 rows
i have a view called view_name. If i use view_name directly in the query, it returns 12 rows. But if i use the select script directly in from clause, it returns more rows. I am not able to find out why it is happening so. Any pointers will be helpful.

Are you saying that the SQL for view_name and view_script are identical? Can you post them?

Query return no rows in Answers but retrun rows in sql

Hi all,
I have the following query which return 3 rows in SQL promple but return no row in Answer and Execute direct request what is the problem any idea?
select abc_date,abc_asset_desc,sum(abc_market_val_lcy+abc_int_accr_lcy) "Stock"
from abc
group by abc_date,abc_asset_descRegards

Hi,
i really appriciate your reply
pls tell me briefly from where i can set log-level > 2 ?? and from where check the physical log of SQL ?
Followig message is arise at server log
ORA-01455 converting column overflow integer datatype at OCI call OCIStmtFetch,Bulk fetched failed
Message was edited by:
53637

25 minutes to run a query then returns no rows

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for