2LIS_02_HDR - Multiple records coming for same EBELN, why?

Hello All,
I ran a setup table for init and tested extraction in rsa3 for data source 2LIS_02_HDR , only one EBELN and it retrievs 3 records for same EBELN. As per my understanding the header data comes from EKKO hence it should bring only one record but retireves multiple records,I want to know why this happens?
thanks
V Pola
Edited by: V pola on Jan 30, 2008 5:35 PM

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. The link does not explain why 2LIS_02_HDr retrieves multiple records instead of one.
Thanks
V Pola

Similar Messages

File Adapter - Multiple Record Types to same Target

I am currently reading in a fixed length file and loading into a table.
The issue is, some of the lines in my file differ by two spaces at the end. See example below.
For example,
Record 1 might look like :
DD/MM/YY - length of 8
Record 2 might look like:
DD/MM/YY{space}{space} - length of 10
and they both go into the same date column of my target
Question 1) Is there a way for BPEL to skip the two spaces at the end of each line for Record 2
Queston 2) I have currently created multiple record types for the two types but it won't allow me in my transformation to map them both to the "date" column in the target table. It says multiple nodes cannot be mapped to the target
Any help would be appreciated.

Hi,
Unfortunately the IKM SQLDR doesn't have the "when" condition to be wrote at ctl file.
If you wish a simple solution, just add an option (drop me a email if you want a LKM with this)
The point is:
With a single option, you will control the when ctl clause and, for instance, can define:
1) create 2 datastores (1 for each file)
2) the first position will be a column at each datastore
3) write the when condition to this first column at the LKM in the interface.
Does it help you?

How can I call multiple records(40) at same time as webservice ?

Hi All
My scenario is some thing like calling SOAP(Webservice) to Rfc(BAPI)
Thing is how can i call multiple records at the same time using the SOAP
adapter i.e i need to make a request to BAPI and in the BAPI response
based on the fields, i need to send to different records....it is Sync call
Can any explain me how to implement this scenario ?
Regards
Kiran lvs

HI,
Please see the below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/content.htm
Regards
Chilla..

Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor

All SAP Gurus,
Is it possible to have Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor code (where purchasing org and company code is same)?
Regards,

hi,
You can't have more than one because the reconcilation account...Because this is the soul account by which you pay to vendor and send the details to further process to FI dept...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Multiple tax lines for same item

Hi,
Is it possible to have multiple tax lines for same item in an invoice in AR.
Business Need - A few items have multiple tax applicable ( e.g. VAT, Service tax, etc ). And for regulatory purpose customer wants to show each tax separately.
please Advise.
thanks,
K

Hi Hikumar,
With tax groups you have what is called compound taxes.
A tax group is consisted of more than one tax codes and these tax codes may be related or not to each other,you can also specify the precedence of the tax codes in a tax group.
On the Invoice or order item line, the tax group code is entered and the tax engine calculates the tax for each tax code that belongs to the tax group.
If the user wants to see the taxes of this line he will see detailed the tax amounts and rates of each tax code that belong to this group.
In my case i have used a tax group with 3 tax codes with the structure:
Item line amount 1000
1)The first line is a specific sales tax(12%) with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*12%=120
2)The second line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount calculated from the first tax of the group=120*23%=27,6
3) The third line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*23%=230
For each item line that has the above tax group, the system creates three seperate tax lines
Your case does not seem so complicate as mine.
You can find more information on the AR user guide and the Oracle receivables tax manual.
On which Ebs version are you working on?
If you sent me more detailed you requirement i can quide you on the way to implement it and test it.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Olga

Invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer

Hi Team,
I just wanted to know if we can create manual invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer?
For project based invoice request i have create based on single invoice request.
Appreciate your input here.
Thanks,
Nitin

Dear Ratish,
Thanks for yr reply.
I already did that but it is not serving business purpose.
Comm payment - comes diff time than sales payment.
so ,I will post one entry customer will get hit with total amount Sales + commission
like below
Let say 10, 000 is the sales value and 500 is the commission
So , This entry will get posted
Customer Db- 10,500
Sales Cr- 10,000
Comm Income Cr- 500
But, As I said sales amt will be paid before so We need to clear it partially and some time customer pays also diff amount due to some defect.
So, We wont be knowing for which case we have or havnet received the payment against commission.
As , Customer account is got hit with total amount( Sales+ Comm..value).
Pls advise how to solve this.
Regards,
Sukh

Calculate Days between same date field in multiple records, looping for each record

Be patient as I am a newbie to Sql Server (using 2008 R2) and SSIS. I have looked at multiple solutions in this and many other forums before submitting the question.
I am looking at records to identify the number of days between two dates. We review drug information. A member uses drug A (Code identifies this called GPI) and has refills throughout time. The goal is to calculate the days between Refill
1 and refill 2, then refill 2 to refill 3, etc. When that member record set is complete, we move to the next member record set.
The basic data would be as follows. Each record shown below would be a separate record in a single table :
Member
Drug Code
DateService
Days Between
1
A
3/1/2012
0
1
A
3/27/2012
27
1
A
4/21/2012
26
1
A
6/15/2012
56
1
F
2/25/2012
0
1
F
3/20/2012
25
1
F
4/17/2012
29
1
F
8/1/2012
107
5
B
2/15/2012
0
5
B
3/10/2012
25
5
B
4/10/2012
32
5
B
6/28/2012
80
5
B
7/10/2012
13
5
B
8/20/2012
42
The days between is the value I am looking to calculate. The First record for the grouping of Member and Drug Code will be zero ( 0 ) as there is no preceding date to calculate against. The process would then loop through the records at the grouping
(Member and Drug Code) until those records are calculated. It would then move on to the next group of Member/Drug records.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Any clarification I can provide, I would be more than happpy too. Thank you in advance!

TSQL- Finding the difference in days of multiple records in SQL ServerWITH OrderDates AS (
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY OrderDate DESC) AS RowNumber,
OrderDate
FROM OrdersTable
WHERE SKU = 'AA0000'
SELECT
AVG(DATEDIFF(DD, O2.OrderDate, O1.OrderDate)) AS AverageFrequency
FROM OrderDates O1
LEFT JOIN OrderDates O2
ON O2.RowNumber = O1.RowNumber + 1
Fabio Bilicki

F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.

Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please?

Multiple GR values for same quantity

Hello all SAP MM Gurus,
I have a strange problem. I have a MM scheduling agreement 5500013812 and in this agreement there is one line item for material 651660. The GR has been done for this line item a number of times since 2009. But when I went to purchase order history of this line item, I found that for a quantity of 500 PCs, the system has posted different amounts.
For example, when the GR was done on 02/21/2011 for qty 500, the amount was 706.68 EUR. When the GR was done on 01/31/2011 for qty 500, the amount was 776.94 and when the GR was done on 12/13/2010 for qty 500, the amount posted was 765.57 EUR. This is really puzzling me since there are no price changes in Material master record or in MM scheduling agreement. There are no alloy surcharge price changes also. But still, why the system is posting different amounts for same quantity of this material, I don't understand.
Can someone please tell me whether I am missing something somewhere? Your suggestion would be very much helpful for me in resolving this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Umakanth

this? :-(
SQL> WITH t AS
2    (SELECT 'SCOTT' NAME ,'jefferson rd' address FROM dual
3     UNION ALL
4    SELECT 'KODY', 'milburn'    FROM dual
5     UNION ALL
6    SELECT 'ZACH', 'westlake rd'     FROM dual
7     UNION ALL
8    SELECT 'KAREN', 'camarillo'    FROM dual
9     UNION ALL
10    SELECT 'MILLER', 'jefferson rd'     FROM dual
11     UNION ALL
12    SELECT   'THOMAS', 'milburn'   FROM dual
13     )
14 SELECT *
15 FROM t
16 WHERE address IN (SELECT address
17                    FROM t
18                   GROUP BY address
19                    HAVING COUNT(*)>1);
NAME   ADDRESS
SCOTT jefferson rd
MILLER jefferson rd
KODY   milburn
THOMAS milburn

When saving a PDF file, it saves multiple of the exact same documents, why/or how do I change those settings?

When savind a PDF file, it saves multiple of the same document, why? Are there settings to adjust or what am I doing wrong?

This might help - I'm not sure:
Go to System Preferences (under the Apple logo in the menu bar). Click "General" and check "Always close windows when quitting an application."

Select Statement to fetch Multiple records of a same field

Hi one and all,
           I have ascenario like this,
I need to fetch the material starting with 'MA%' and material Starting with 'RT%' and so on.....data from the table resb with reference to AFPO-AUFNR.
Now how can write select Query.
Iknow how to fetch for a single type of material 'MA%'(using LIKE)
But for multiple selection of the same fieldi cant do anything ,
if anybody knows Please Help me.....
I wil be very thankful if u r helped.
Regards,
rajesh.

I have been trying in the same way
like
DATA : sp TYPE char3,
       b3 TYPE char3,
       b5 TYPE char3,
       rt TYPE char3,
       sh TYPE char3,
       rp TYPE char3.
sp = 'SP%'.
b3 = 'B3%'.
b5 = 'B5%'.
rt = 'RT%'.
sh = 'SH%'.
rp = 'RP%'.
SELECT * FROM
         resb
INTO   TABLE gt_resb
WHERE aufnr = wa_itab-aufnr.
AND matnr LIKE RT.
OR matnr LIKE b3
OR matnr LIKE b5
OR matnr LIKE sh
OR matnr LIKE rp
OR matnr LIKE sp.
its not working.
Regards,
rajesh S

BPEL - multiple receive elements for same partner/operation

Is it possible to have more Receive elements for same operation in one BP? I need to create a business process for approving requests in a number of steps. The process looks like this:
RECEIVE (createRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (createRequest)
RECEIVE (approveRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (approveRequest)
RECEIVE (approveRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (approveRequest)
(...)The creation and first recieve element for "approveRequest" is ok, but the others are never executed. I believe the correlation sets are set correctly. I also can't use a While element since every step could be a bit different. If I substitute the other recieves for different operations, the whole process executes correctly.
Can someone please advice me on what i am doing wrong? If it's somehow not possible to have more then one Recieve for a particular message in one BP, what is the best way to do it differently?

Thank you for your answer. I tried to change the Receive elements to Pick + OnMessage, but it's not working either. It goes past the first one but it never reaches the second one. That's what i had in the first place - two Pick elements after each other, each with an 'approve' and 'dispprove' branch, but it didn't work so I simplified it to an easier process with just receive elements.
If it's working for you, do you do something special in the process? Which version of OpenESB are you using? Would it be possible for you to send the BPEL file? Here is a part of mine I've just made to test this solution.
<bpws:pick name="Pick1">
    <bpws:onMessage partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemIn5">
        <bpws:correlations>
            <bpws:correlation set="orderItemId" initiate="no"/>
        </bpws:correlations>
        <bpws:sequence name="Sequence2">
            <bpws:assign name="Assign7">
                <bpws:copy>
                    <bpws:from>true()</bpws:from>
                    <bpws:to part="return" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut4"/>
                </bpws:copy>
            </bpws:assign>
            <bpws:reply name="Reply3" partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut4"/>
        </bpws:sequence>
    </bpws:onMessage>
</bpws:pick>
<bpws:pick name="Pick2">
    <bpws:onMessage partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemIn6">
        <bpws:correlations>
            <bpws:correlation set="orderItemId" initiate="no"/>
        </bpws:correlations>
        <bpws:sequence name="Sequence1">
            <bpws:assign name="Assign6">
                <bpws:copy>
                    <bpws:from>true()</bpws:from>
                    <bpws:to part="return" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut3"/>
                </bpws:copy>
            </bpws:assign>
            <bpws:reply name="Reply2" partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut3"/>
        </bpws:sequence>
    </bpws:onMessage>
</bpws:pick>

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

PSE, multiple Windows users for same files - how do use the same profile?

I have collected all my digital media into a NAS unit, available on my LAN. All users have their own users on to the LAN, but I would like to share one "profile" for all when it comes to the PSE view of my pictures, so that we can all use the same tagging, importing by different users onto shared storage should be visible for all in Organizer etc.
I'm simply not understanding the project concept of PSE ("My Catalog") to make this happen myself - could some of you knowledgable people give me a hint on how to accomplish this?
I fail to believe I'm the only one with family pictures that several persons should be able to work with together.
TIA
//Niklas
Ps. I used to work in PSE7, have recently upgraded to PSE9. Have a WinXP / Win7 environment with multiple users and multiple computers, not domain-controlled.

I've done this years ago using PSE3-6, but had less than satisfactorily results.
I would not recommend it as your DB might get seriously compromised.
You could however, copy the whole Catalog-directory and -files to each local host and then update these files on a regular base from the "master" host on to the other "clients". You'll want the master host to be the only one allowed to make changes/updates/deletes to the DB.
The prerequisite is that the NAS-share will have the same driveletter/full path on each client, otherwise you'll have to reconnect thousands of missing files each time the path/driveletter changes.....
Maybe APE9 is less finicky and allows to do exactly what you (and me too....) want.
I'll try it in the near future when I'll have time to play with it more and let you know if you're still interested then. (can take months... )

FI F110 payment run multiple payment documents for same vendor l

We have an issue where a F110 automatic payment run creates two payment documents for the same vendor multiple open items in the same run. The payment method for all the open items is the same. I am not able to identify the logic based on which system bifurcates these open items to create two different payment documents. It is standard SAP functionality and we do not have any additional customization.
I have also checked criteria mentioned in FBZP Payment method in company code Payment per due day but does not seem to be relevant. If you have any pointers in this context request you to share the same at the earliest.

Hello,
In FBZP we have below setting for grouping of items in company code payment method.
1.Single payment for marked line item: Single payment will be created for every line item if this check box is selected.
2.Payment per due day: One payment document is created for all the invoices which are due on specific due date.
Please check if any of above option is selected here.
We have also control at vendor master:
Vendor master data > Company code > Payment data > Automatic payment transactions > individual payment.
If check box is selected then every vendor or customer item is paid separately during automatic payment transactions.
Thanks!
Raju

2LIS_02_HDR - Multiple records coming for same EBELN, why?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for