BPEL - multiple receive elements for same partner/operation

Is it possible to have more Receive elements for same operation in one BP? I need to create a business process for approving requests in a number of steps. The process looks like this:
RECEIVE (createRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (createRequest)
RECEIVE (approveRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (approveRequest)
RECEIVE (approveRequest)= INVOKE (...)
< REPLY (approveRequest)
(...)The creation and first recieve element for "approveRequest" is ok, but the others are never executed. I believe the correlation sets are set correctly. I also can't use a While element since every step could be a bit different. If I substitute the other recieves for different operations, the whole process executes correctly.
Can someone please advice me on what i am doing wrong? If it's somehow not possible to have more then one Recieve for a particular message in one BP, what is the best way to do it differently?

Thank you for your answer. I tried to change the Receive elements to Pick + OnMessage, but it's not working either. It goes past the first one but it never reaches the second one. That's what i had in the first place - two Pick elements after each other, each with an 'approve' and 'dispprove' branch, but it didn't work so I simplified it to an easier process with just receive elements.
If it's working for you, do you do something special in the process? Which version of OpenESB are you using? Would it be possible for you to send the BPEL file? Here is a part of mine I've just made to test this solution.
<bpws:pick name="Pick1">
    <bpws:onMessage partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemIn5">
        <bpws:correlations>
            <bpws:correlation set="orderItemId" initiate="no"/>
        </bpws:correlations>
        <bpws:sequence name="Sequence2">
            <bpws:assign name="Assign7">
                <bpws:copy>
                    <bpws:from>true()</bpws:from>
                    <bpws:to part="return" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut4"/>
                </bpws:copy>
            </bpws:assign>
            <bpws:reply name="Reply3" partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut4"/>
        </bpws:sequence>
    </bpws:onMessage>
</bpws:pick>
<bpws:pick name="Pick2">
    <bpws:onMessage partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemIn6">
        <bpws:correlations>
            <bpws:correlation set="orderItemId" initiate="no"/>
        </bpws:correlations>
        <bpws:sequence name="Sequence1">
            <bpws:assign name="Assign6">
                <bpws:copy>
                    <bpws:from>true()</bpws:from>
                    <bpws:to part="return" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut3"/>
                </bpws:copy>
            </bpws:assign>
            <bpws:reply name="Reply2" partnerLink="Client" operation="approveOrderItem" portType="ns1:OrderManagementClientPortType" variable="ApproveOrderItemOut3"/>
        </bpws:sequence>
    </bpws:onMessage>
</bpws:pick>

Similar Messages

Multiple receiving points for BPEL

Can we bind one BPEL to multiple Adapters, for e.g. File and JMS adapters calls the same BPEL as well as we should be able to send SOAP messages from a SOAP client to the same BPEL? (Multiple receiving points for one BPEL)
here is what i need to do
To create an adapter we create an partner link and bind that partner link with the "receive activity", as I understand we can bind only one partner link with "receive activity", but if I create a "file adapter" partner link and a "JMS adapter" partner link, how do I bind both of them with "receive activity"? so i dont need to write a seperate BPEL for each adapter.

I have a similar problem but the tutorial does not solve my problem and I think it does not solve the jms and file process either.
I want to have a process to receive a message, do things and then receive another message. The difference with the tutorial is that in the tutorial the Buyer is called, it calls to the seller and gets the response. In my case (and in the jms and file example), we wanto to get to receive the second time without invoking first to a process.
(In my case the client is the same, but need to send two messages, in the first message ask for a operation and gets an Id. In the second message it sends the Id to confirm the operation. I could do that with two processes, but I prefer to do it with one process if possible. I am trying to use the Id to correlate the second receive).
I am using correlations set and two roles for the process entry point (one for the first receive in the process and another for the second receive in the middle). But in the second role, when I see the generated WSDL from the console, the endpoint is something like http://set.by.caller, instead of a real endpoint.
How can the second client call my process ? what endpoint should it be using ?
Can a process expose two endpoints to be called ? How ?
Thanks.

Multiple Receiver Dtermination from Same Business Sender Service to RecvStp

Hi,
I was trying to implement FORK STEP in ccBPM. Scenario I'm trying to implement is, using fork bundle PO with same items together.
Can anybody help me to create multiple receiver dterminations for three receiver steps in three branches of fork step, where a common business sender service and same Integration process is used for receiving messages into SAP XI.
Please advice soon,
Thank You,

Hi Murali,
If it's always the same message, only one receiver determination is necessary. I'd also rather tend to do the capturing within a loop which is executed three times.
Best regards
Joachim

Multiple tax lines for same item

Hi,
Is it possible to have multiple tax lines for same item in an invoice in AR.
Business Need - A few items have multiple tax applicable ( e.g. VAT, Service tax, etc ). And for regulatory purpose customer wants to show each tax separately.
please Advise.
thanks,
K

Hi Hikumar,
With tax groups you have what is called compound taxes.
A tax group is consisted of more than one tax codes and these tax codes may be related or not to each other,you can also specify the precedence of the tax codes in a tax group.
On the Invoice or order item line, the tax group code is entered and the tax engine calculates the tax for each tax code that belongs to the tax group.
If the user wants to see the taxes of this line he will see detailed the tax amounts and rates of each tax code that belong to this group.
In my case i have used a tax group with 3 tax codes with the structure:
Item line amount 1000
1)The first line is a specific sales tax(12%) with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*12%=120
2)The second line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount calculated from the first tax of the group=120*23%=27,6
3) The third line is a VAT(23%) tax with taxable basis the amount of the item line=1000*23%=230
For each item line that has the above tax group, the system creates three seperate tax lines
Your case does not seem so complicate as mine.
You can find more information on the AR user guide and the Oracle receivables tax manual.
On which Ebs version are you working on?
If you sent me more detailed you requirement i can quide you on the way to implement it and test it.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Olga

Invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer

Hi Team,
I just wanted to know if we can create manual invoice request based on multiple sales order for same customer?
For project based invoice request i have create based on single invoice request.
Appreciate your input here.
Thanks,
Nitin

Dear Ratish,
Thanks for yr reply.
I already did that but it is not serving business purpose.
Comm payment - comes diff time than sales payment.
so ,I will post one entry customer will get hit with total amount Sales + commission
like below
Let say 10, 000 is the sales value and 500 is the commission
So , This entry will get posted
Customer Db- 10,500
Sales Cr- 10,000
Comm Income Cr- 500
But, As I said sales amt will be paid before so We need to clear it partially and some time customer pays also diff amount due to some defect.
So, We wont be knowing for which case we have or havnet received the payment against commission.
As , Customer account is got hit with total amount( Sales+ Comm..value).
Pls advise how to solve this.
Regards,
Sukh

Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor

All SAP Gurus,
Is it possible to have Multiple reconcillation accounts for same vendor code (where purchasing org and company code is same)?
Regards,

hi,
You can't have more than one because the reconcilation account...Because this is the soul account by which you pay to vendor and send the details to further process to FI dept...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Multiple integration flows for different business operations

Hi - I have following business requirement & need ur advice.
There are different business operations (read as INSERT/DELETE/QUERY) to performed on same business object (read as CUSTOMER). In order to develop these integration use case I can have following three approaches.
*1. Single Requestor ABCS & Single Provider ABCS -* Develop single integration flow & implement logic for the business operations in them. That means, Develop single Requestor ABCS for all business operations, which will call the EBS and again EBS would call same Provider ABCS. Both Requestor & Provider ABCS would implement business logic for all business operations required.
*2. Single Requestor ABCS & Multiple Provider ABCS -* In this case the flows for all business operations starts with single point service. That means, Develop single Requestor ABCS for all business operations, which will call the EBS and again EBS would call different Provider ABCS based on the business operations. The Requestor ABCS would implement business logic for all business operations required. There would be different ABCS service for different business operations.
*3. Multiple Requestor ABCS & Multiple Provider ABCS -* In this case the completely independent flows are to be developed for all business operations. Independent Requestor ABCS and independent Provider ABCS. Off course if there some common business logic for all or some business operations, those can be implemented as common service & can used across all independent flows for different business operations.
Please do suggest what approach would be best one to pick up. Or it is case to case basis. In case yes, please suggest the criteria on which the decision can be taken.
Thanks In Advance
Priyadarshi

Hi Pryadarshi,
AIA recommends having an ABCS for each Verb and Noun combination for a specific Business Process, i.e. CreateCustomerABCS and UpdateCustomerABCS. Therefore, #3 would be the preferred approach. This is to allow for maximum flexibility. However, you may have a process that demands to model the integration as #2.
The decision would depend on how the participating application services are modeled and the granularity of individual service call. For example, a ProcessCustomer invocation at the source end may call CreateCustomer provider service.
Regards
Rohit

F110 Payment Proposal multiple payment lines for same vendor

Hello,
Question for the FI community regarding single payments for multiple invoices for the same vendor. Is there any other place that would dictate the grouping (or non grouping) of multiple payment proposal lines for same vendor payment?
I understand that there are two places:
FBZP - Change view 'Maintenance of Company Code Data for a Payment Method", the flag for 'Single payment for marked item'
Vendor Master - Automatic payment transactions, flag for 'Individual pmnt'
Is there anywhere else where this may be dictated? At my location, we have two company codes that make ACH payments, settings for FBZP (Single payment for marked item flag) and selected vendor for payment in the vendor master is identical. I get different results when viewing the payment proposal for each company code. Company Code A parses out individual line items for payment in the proposal, and Company Code B does not. When I change the flag via FBZP for Company Code A, this resolves the issue. When I make the same change for Company Code B, there is no change.
In all of my testing, I have left the 'Individual pmnt' flag for both vendor masters unchecked.
I'm hoping that somebody in the community here would be able to point me in the right direction to understand why I am getting differences. Is there somewhere else that I can check?
Thanks everyone.

Ravi,
Thanks for your reply, however in my post I already mentioned I have tested out both options via FBZP as well as the vendor master. You are correct, in only one case regarding my situation.
In my example for Company Code B, I have the following scenarios:
1. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
2. FBZP - single payment for marked item checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is multiple payment items for each invoice
3. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option not checked, result is a single payment item for multiple invoices
4. FBZP - single payment for marked item not checked, Vendor individual payment option is checked, result is a multiple payment items for each invoice
Are you saying that the option in FBZP simply enables the grouping/non grouping based on what the vendor master record payment option is? Typically, that option for vendors is not checked in either of our company codes, therefore if the only difference is the setting in FBZP, then why would I be getting only a single payment for multiple invoices in the case of scenario 1 listed above?
That's why I am wondering if perhaps there is something elsewhere than FBZP and vendor master settings that could be affecting this.
Comments please?

Receive data for same IDOC from 2 different scenarios

Hello,
I have already scenario that received xml file and transfer data to IDOC (The IDOC is purchase order).
This scenario works fine.
Now I try to add more scenarios. This scenario takes files from other xml source work with new mapping and transfer data to same IDOC.
The problem is in integration builder u2013
When I try to create receiver agreement the message the message "Object already exists" appear.
How can I solve this issue?
Elad

Hi Elad,
+Now I try to add more scenarios. This scenario takes files from other xml source work with new mapping and transfer data to same IDOC.
The problem is in integration builder u2013
When I try to create receiver agreement the message the message "Object already exists" appear.+
Does this mean that the other xml source is from the same party? If yes, then that party is already configured in your receiver agreement as explained by the error "Object already exists".
If the xml source is from a different party. What you can do is to delete the existing receiver determination. Make a new one and replace the party with an "*", in that way, increasing the parties would only consist of one receiver determination for that particular interface. You would only have to add sender and receiver agreements.
Hope this helps,

Conditional base routing to multiple receiver's for syncronous interface

Hi All,
I have a requirement of sysnchronous interface where i need to send the message to 2 diffrent systems based on the routing condition. Based on routing condition we will determine the receiver to send message and response shloud send back to sender.
Please let me know my requirement is possible using sysnchromous call i.e sending to multiple receiver's based on conditon. Thanks.
Regards,
KK
Message was edited by:
kalpana k

Aamir,
I dont think BPM is required here,XI always use mesasgeID as the reference.
lets say you sent a request then XI generates message ID :11111 (for Ex)
and for the response XI again generate another message ID:22222(for Ex),but referencing to MessageID:11111,it cant be to some other request message ID.(always reference is maintained by XI for Sync calls)
so we dont need to maintain any relationship between request and respone ,explicitly.it is being taken care by XI itself for sync calls.
response1 for a request1 wont go to someothers request2.
I dont know whether you get my point what I was trying to say.
and just using Xpaths in receiver determination would give the solution.but need to have two Receiver agreements.
I might be wrong !
thank you,
regards,
Babu Sri

Output type maintained for same partner function.

Hi Gurus,
Can we maintain outupt type for different transmission medium like print output, EDI and special function with in same partner function ? Please explain also?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Hemat ghiya
Edited by: Hemant ghiya on Oct 5, 2011 1:28 PM

Hi Rags,
Thanks for your quick reply but i am getting problem at the time of determination . Once i have determined for one medium and then i will determine for another medium with same partner function then it is giving error like this partner funcition alerady used.
So i am not able to determined for the another transmission medium after determining for one medium.
Can you give your valueable suggestion.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Hemant ghiya

2LIS_02_HDR - Multiple records coming for same EBELN, why?

Hello All,
I ran a setup table for init and tested extraction in rsa3 for data source 2LIS_02_HDR , only one EBELN and it retrievs 3 records for same EBELN. As per my understanding the header data comes from EKKO hence it should bring only one record but retireves multiple records,I want to know why this happens?
thanks
V Pola
Edited by: V pola on Jan 30, 2008 5:35 PM

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. The link does not explain why 2LIS_02_HDr retrieves multiple records instead of one.
Thanks
V Pola

Multiple GR values for same quantity

Hello all SAP MM Gurus,
I have a strange problem. I have a MM scheduling agreement 5500013812 and in this agreement there is one line item for material 651660. The GR has been done for this line item a number of times since 2009. But when I went to purchase order history of this line item, I found that for a quantity of 500 PCs, the system has posted different amounts.
For example, when the GR was done on 02/21/2011 for qty 500, the amount was 706.68 EUR. When the GR was done on 01/31/2011 for qty 500, the amount was 776.94 and when the GR was done on 12/13/2010 for qty 500, the amount posted was 765.57 EUR. This is really puzzling me since there are no price changes in Material master record or in MM scheduling agreement. There are no alloy surcharge price changes also. But still, why the system is posting different amounts for same quantity of this material, I don't understand.
Can someone please tell me whether I am missing something somewhere? Your suggestion would be very much helpful for me in resolving this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Umakanth

this? :-(
SQL> WITH t AS
2    (SELECT 'SCOTT' NAME ,'jefferson rd' address FROM dual
3     UNION ALL
4    SELECT 'KODY', 'milburn'    FROM dual
5     UNION ALL
6    SELECT 'ZACH', 'westlake rd'     FROM dual
7     UNION ALL
8    SELECT 'KAREN', 'camarillo'    FROM dual
9     UNION ALL
10    SELECT 'MILLER', 'jefferson rd'     FROM dual
11     UNION ALL
12    SELECT   'THOMAS', 'milburn'   FROM dual
13     )
14 SELECT *
15 FROM t
16 WHERE address IN (SELECT address
17                    FROM t
18                   GROUP BY address
19                    HAVING COUNT(*)>1);
NAME   ADDRESS
SCOTT jefferson rd
MILLER jefferson rd
KODY   milburn
THOMAS milburn

TPM : Inbound : Maintenance of multiple messages for same partner

Hello Experts,
I am facing one strange issue.
I have this below partner maintained already for Message direction = Inbound. But when I try to add one more message ( 93A-EAN007 ) for the same Sender Partner, it gives an error as shown in the second screenshot.
But whereas when I add do similarly with Message direction = Outbound, I can add multiple messages as shown in 3rd screenshot.
Can you please help.
Second screenshot
Third screenshot
Thanks
Saurabh

Hi Saurabh ,
Directory parameters in TPM Agrements are completely Optional .
Even if you define them, they will not be used in any runtime scenario..
They will be used only in Message mapping (for fetching functional profile values),if you want to fetch some functional profile values.There is a seperate TPM function provided incase you want to call an agreement based on directory parameters.
So, whenever you enter values in TPM agreement directory parameters, then you cannot have second agreement with the same directory values. If the direcotry paramters are left blank, then they will not be considered for this uniqueness check.
On the otherside,if the agreement is based on EDI paramters (which are anyway mandatory), the agreement is used in runtime via different EDI components as well as can be used in Message mapping
(for fetching functional profile values) via predefined TPM functions.
Thanks
Appala

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

BPEL - multiple receive elements for same partner/operation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for