2LIS_11_V_SCL not extracting orders with doc_type 'Z**'

Hi All,
We are not getting any schedule line data records for order with document type 'ZDS'(custom type) while extracting from the data source 2LIS_11_V_SCL. We do get records for the same sales order from data sources 2LIS_11_VAHDR and 2LIS_11_VAITM.
I checked the sales orders with doc_type 'ZDS', in R/3 and there are schedule lines existing for those orders but the same is not getting to BW thru the extractor 2LIS_11_V_SCL.
Any idea what could be wrong?
Thanks in advance.
Cecil

Then I believe you need to enhance your user-exit for that extractor to pick up those new order types as well.

Similar Messages

BAPI "BAPI_POSRVAPS_GETLIST2" not extracting Orders with category BC and BD

Hi,
I am using a BAPI "BAPI_POSRVAPS_GETLIST2" to extract the receipts and requirement elements from live cache, however I found that this BAPI does not extract orders with category BC and BD (Stock transfer reservation).
Can you kindly let me know whether this is correct ? BC and BD does not fall in receipt or requirement category ?
If yes then which BAPI should I use to extract orders with BC and BD category ?
Thanks & Regards,
Rohit

Hi Rohit,
The categories BC & BD are coming under reciepts & requirements only and i guess should be retrived by standard BAPI.
Please try using BAPI BAPI_POSRVAPS_GETLIST3.
and also mention correct 'locationproducts' as mentioned in the below thread.
Purchase order data for ATP category BH and BI not retrieved
Initially plese try to retrieve the details by 'Order number' to make sure the BAPI is working fine. Later you can do it by locproducts and ATP category.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Deepthi

BAPI not extracting orders with category BD and BC

Hi ,
i tried following BAPI to extract orders category datas from live cache.
BAPI_POSRVAPS_GETLIST2
BAPI_POSRVAPS_GETLIST3
But both the BAPIs not extracting orders with ATP category BD , BC .
Any one faced this issue? Or do i missing anything.
Is there any other BAPI or functional module available to extract this??

Hi rajesht ,
On which version are you working on?; check that the order is on the validity of the planning version. Once I get this behavior, I re-transported the data source and replicate data sources; after that I could see the information; nevertheless, there are on OSS some notes could apply (depending on your version).
Best regards,
Gustavo Pérez

Why this code do not extract zip with directory

This class only work with simple files in zip archiwe. How make the same effect with directory? Thanks for your time.
public class ZipTest {
     public ZipTest() throws IOException {
           // Get the zip name and the entry name.
           String zipName = "myzip.zip";
           String entryName = "myDir"+File.separatorChar+"myfile.gif";
           // Open the zip.
           ZipFile zip = new ZipFile(zipName);
           System.out.println(zipName + " opened.");
           try {
              // Get the entry and its input stream.
              ZipEntry entry = zip.getEntry(entryName);
              if (entry != null) {
                 // Get an input stream for the entry.
                 InputStream entryStream = zip.getInputStream(entry);
                 try {
                    // Create the output file (clobbering the file if it exists).
                    FileOutputStream file = new FileOutputStream(entry.getName());
                    System.out.println(file.toString());
                    try {
                       // Allocate a buffer for reading the entry data.
                       byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];
                       int bytesRead;
                       // Read the entry data and write it to the output file.
                       while ((bytesRead = entryStream.read(buffer)) != -1) {
                          file.write(buffer, 0, bytesRead);
                       System.out.println(entry.getName() + " extracted.");
                    finally {
                       file.close();
                 finally {
                    entryStream.close();
              else {
                 System.out.println(entryName + " not found.");
              } // end if
           finally {
              zip.close();
              System.out.println(zipName + " closed.");
     public static void main(String[] args) {
          new ZipTest();
}

Hints: 1 and 2
And for the love for <insert anything here>, catch!

Sale order with item category TAN not getting displayed in md04

Hi,
We have a sale order with item category TAN, Schedule line category CP, MRP type ND and availability check as 07. This is not getting reflected in md04. But item category TAB gets displayed under the PR number.
Please let me know what checks to be made or changes to be done for the sale order with item category TAN to get displayed in md04 screen
Thanks & Regards

Hi all,
I changed the MRP type to PD, and from the next sale order, line item onwards, it was getting displayed in md04 screen. The already created one anyway dint get reflected. So I had to delete the line item and create a new one.
Thanks all for the help
Regards,
Jegashree

Sales orders from CRM are not getting blocked with credit check

Hi All
I have configured ECC in such a way that , if cutomer does not have enough creditlimt, then those sales order will get blocked. Our orders will come from CRM, and some times some orders are not getting blocked with credit check even though the customer does not have credit limit. And at the same time some orders are blocked with credit check...what are all the things that should be checked to diagnose the problem.
Thanks in advance for looking into this

Please check if you have any custom code/user exit in ECC which uses transaction code (VA01 , VA02 or VA05 etc) prior to invoking credit checks.
Orders created via CRM will not have transaction code set (SY-TCODE).

Creation of sales order with reference - Zfields in Add data B are not cop

Hi all,
Please help me in the issue . I am creating sales order with reference to returns order . All item fields are getting copied but the Zfields which are added in addtional data b of sales order are not getting copied. Can anyone please let me know the procedure to copy the custom fields.
Thanks in advance,

The setting of field when copy by reference is best done in the copy rules.
If you go to transaction VTAA, and look to the order type you are copying to, you will find a data transfer rule number.
Then go to transaction VOFM, menu option DATA TRANSFER -> ORDERS and find the matching data transfer rule number.
Select and press the "Source text" button, here you will find the data from the copied order in structure CVBAK, and you can apply the code to set the VBAK structure fields appropriately.
This should then populate the data on the copied order.

Create sales order with ref to quotation - usage of line items not copied

hi
i have created a quotation for which the first line item(higher level item) is a configurable item for which the value of the field use (vbap-vkaus) is blank and the line items the use field is given as 'HIDE DISCOUNT'.
when i created a order with reference to the above quotation i am not getting the value "HIDE DISCOUNT" populated for the line items for usage field ..
can any one knows any user exit / data transfer routine please suggest me
thanks in advance
rajani yeluri

hi
i have created a quotation for which the first line item(higher level item) is a configurable item for which the value of the field use (vbap-vkaus) is blank and the line items the use field is given as 'HIDE DISCOUNT'.
when i created a order with reference to the above quotation i am not getting the value "HIDE DISCOUNT" populated for the line items for usage field ..
can any one knows any user exit / data transfer routine please suggest me
thanks in advance
rajani yeluri

Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not define

Hi,
I'm trying to post an IDOC of type BBPIV through XI to an R/3 system.
The posted idoc in R/3 is in status 51 (Application document not posted) with the error message "Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not defined in chart of acts WP2P"
As per my understanding this is something related to FI.
Long text of the error is "The system cannot generate an automatic posting because there is no account determination defined for Account-assigned purchase order with keys in chart of accounts WP2P.
Correct the account determination for Account-assigned purchase order"
Please help me how to solve this.
Regards,
Rashmi

Hiya,
This looks like its a MM posting / transaction.
You need to go to OBYC and maintain the account assignment. If you provide the business scenario (GR into Stock, Subcontracting, etc.) for the process, I may be able to help.
VKOA is for SD account assignment and I don't believe you can use that here.
Cheers.

Order by in MATERIALIZED VIEW not work successfully with first column (ID)

Dears,
I am trying to create a Materialized View as below:
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW HR.MV_EMP
PCTFREE 10
MAXTRANS 255
TABLESPACE users
STORAGE (
INITIAL 65536
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
BUILD IMMEDIATE
REFRESH ON DEMAND
AS
SELECT *
FROM employees
where rownum < 5000 order by employee_id desc ;But while querying the MATERIALIZED VIEW, it did not work successfully as the data did not appear in the accurate order.
I tried to create the same MATERIALIZED VIEW but order by another column (Column Date), it worked successfully and the data appeared in the accurate order.
It means that MATERIALIZED VIEW not work successfully with the first column (id).
Can you please help me in this ?
Thanks & regards,,

A few pointers :
1. As has been pointed out, the ROWNUM has been incorrectly placed. ROWNUM values are assigned as rows are fetched from the source before the ORDER BY. You need to ORDER BY first (in a SubQuery) and then ROWNUM afterwards (outside the SubQuery).
2. I wonder why you want only the last 5000 EMPLOYEE_IDs. What if Employee_ID 1 is still an active employee (he is the founder, first employee and CEO ?). There could be very many "low" EMPLOYEE_IDs that are still active.
3. Logically I would expect some filter other than the ROWNUM ... ORDER BY to be used to select candidate rows. Then, an ORDER BY in the CREATE query would be unnecessary.
4. When querying the Materialized View you must explicitly ORDER BY (irrespective of whether you did or did not do an ORDER BY in the CREATE ...)
5. How do you expect to refresh the MV ? Will it always be a COMPLETE Refresh ? Remember that your "5000 employees" filter would likely exclude older employees at the next refresh. If you use some other filter, it should be consistent across all refreshs.
Hemant K Chitale

Purchase Order History not appearing for Purchase Order with service items

A purchase order with a service item has been created. A SES has been created and Miro transactions as well. When tcode ME2L is executed, the Purchase Order History field is blank. Any configuration missing or is there an applicable OSS note to fix this?

Hi,
It is a coding error.
Could you please check if you have applied the note 1049031 with the latest version 13?
Regards,
Edit

Do not change the payment term created a Sales Order with reference

Hi Gurus,
Do not change the payment term created a Sales Order with reference to a contract where the payer of the change in Sales Order.

Hello ,
As per my understanding , you do not want the payment terms to be changed even if the payer partner function is changed ,
as standard sap redetermines the payment terms with change in partner function, you may use the exit
USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAK- header level
USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP- Item level
in this you could write a small code which will not change the payment terms when payer is redetermined
hope this helps
Thanks
akasha

Sales order does not extract plant information from material master data

Hi experts,
I have created a sales order. However, the plant in the shipping tab can only be manually entered.
I have made the check:
the customer material master data does not have the plant info.
the customer master data does not have it either.
It is defined in the material master data: sales:general/plant
But the sales order did not extract this information. Why does this happen?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Fan

Hello Friend,
As right stated by you,
The Plant will be copied from the master data to the sales order, if not it should be manually entered
The Sequence System will search for the Plant is as follow..
1. Customer material infor record, If it was not maintained then it will search in
2. Customer master, if the entre was not maintained in the SHIPPING TAB
3. Finally it will search in the Material master in the Sales organisation data 1 in the field DELVERING PLANT field.
So please search whether the entry was maintained in that field at the sales:sales organisation data 1.
This might be the issue.
Please revert if you want further details
regards,
santosh

Create internal order with reference - Do not copy distribution rule group

Hi,
I'm creating an internal order with reference to another order through tcode KO01. When i will display the new internal order, i already have distribuion rule group that was copied from the reference order. To delete the incorrect distribution rule group i execute tcode KO02, however this information do not appear in tcode KO02.
What should be done to delete this settlement rule? I do not want to copy the settlement rules from the old internal order.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ana Fernandes

Hi.
'What should be done in order to do not copy this information when i create the internal order with reference?'
in tcode kot2_opa do not maintain Settlement profile for Order category 3
Also go to KOM2 and delete Settlement rule for order, from which you copying.
'in table COBRB i can see the information however i can not delete it. The validy period is empty.'-in su53 check authority

WIP status (RESA) not updated for process order with co-product

Hi,
We are facing the scenario below, please confirm whether item 2 behaviour is standard SAP.
1. Process order with settlement rule MAT - after WIP calculated, status RESA is updated & FI document it posted.
2. Process order with settlement rule OIT (co-product) - after WIP calculated, status RESA not updated & FI document posted.
Thank you.

Self found answer

2LIS_11_V_SCL not extracting orders with doc_type 'Z**'

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for