3 management servers (500 agents) are using excessive memory

Hi,
Our Opsmgr 2012 R2 UR2 environment has got 3 management server for 500 agents
We got a few large MP's like:
Veeam, Cisco UCS (divided on two management servers)
One management server which has got only reporting service and the webconsole, without agents, is losing 16 gig of memory a day. The next day the server has consumed all the memory and we need to restart the server.
How can a new R2/UR2 management server consume so much memory on a server who communicates with reportings service which isn't used much and with a webconsole we don't use much.
Kind regards,
André

Hi,
Would you please look into your task manager and find out the corresponding process that eat up most memory.
In addition, hope the below article can be helpful for you:
Troubleshooting Windows Performance Issues: Lots of RAM but no Available Memory
http://blogs.technet.com/b/mspfe/archive/2012/12/06/lots-of-ram-but-no-available-memory.aspx
Regards,
Yan Li
Regards, Yan Li

Similar Messages

My macbook pro keeps saying I have 450 gigabytes out of 500 that are used. But when I look on finder there are no files that are anywhere close to that amount. I went through and deleted files from my mac and now I only have 10 gs free

My macbook pro keeps saying I have 450 gigabytes out of 500 that are used. But when I look on finder there are no files that are anywhere close to that amount. I went through and deleted files from my mac and now I only have 10 gigabytes of additional space free. My mac now says I have 440 gigs of other that is used. But does not make sense, do I have a virus?

Since you have not identified the OS your MBP is using, these extract may or may not assist you.
http://pondini.org/OSX/LionStorage.html
http://pondini.org/OSX/DiskSpace.html
You may also download from the Internet OmniDiskSweeper (free) and open it it will show all of the files on your MBP and the respective sizes.
ciao.

Why does AVG Internet Security keep warning me that Firefox is using excessive memory and advisin me to close it and reopen?

My browser was open and I was on Facebook. A message appeared from AVG Internet Security 2012, which is operating on my computer, telling me that FireFox was using excessive memory -- "260 MB of memory" and suggesting I close FireFox and reopen.
This has happened several times; also when I was on CNN and Yahoo webpages.

How much RAM do you have?
300MB is a lot if you only have 512MB, but not too much if you have 1 or 2 GB, or more.
http://blogs.avg.com/community/avg-feedback-update-week-44/
See - 3. AVG Advisor = Disable AVG Advisor performance notifications <br />
or try using the "Change when these notifications appear" and set a higher threshhold

How can I determine which apps are using excessive data on a Samsung Galaxy?

We have been going over our data plan for the last couple of months.

settings > data usage, then you can scroll through the list of apps that are using data
Also ensure that apps are set to either not update automatically or to update only over wi-fi (through your Google Play app settings).

Since installing the last update I am getting warnings through AVG that friefox is using excessive memory - 215 MB. Please provide input as to whteher this is a matter of concern becuase the window is coming up constantly.

I am on a dell 620 laptop. Every time I get on Firefox, an AVG window is popping up saying that excessive memory is being used (215 MB) and it recommends that I log out and log back in for faster processing. Logging out does not make a difference. The last update also disabled my AVG tool bar from the internet screen which I am not sure matters much, but I am concerned about the excessive memory use warning. Can you please provide me guidance about this matter?

Thanks but I have no idea how to do that and don't know the purpose of the add- ons or what is considered critical in the updates so that is outside of my knowledge level and comfort. How do I find out what is critical in the update without devoting a major chunk of my life to it? This is getting frustrating from my perspective. I am going to contact AVG and ask them how this pop up is gauging what to interpret critical memory use. If you have any other thoughts they are appreciated

Why Does Safari Use Excessive Memory with Gmail?

I am running Safari 7.0.1 along with Maverics (10.9.1) on a 2011 MacBook Air with 4 GB of memory. Just recently I have begun to notice excessive memory usage when using Gmail. I have iStat Menus as well as something called MemoryKeeper so I can monitor memory use in real time.
The table below shows numbers taken from Activity Monitor with each of the sites running in a single tab. The Safari Web Content is through the roof with Gmail compared to My Yahoo or indeed with any other single site. In Gmail it starts out above 500 MB and slowly comes down to the lower end indicated if I do nothing. If I open tabs with both My Yahoo and Gmail, I sink below 100 MB and if I have three tabs open I'm heading to zero. As far as I can tell, the excessive memory useage only occurs with Gmail.
Process
Yahoo
Gmail
Safari
156 MB
167 MB
Safari Web Content
96 MB
531-338 MB
Kernel Task
464 MB
464 MB
Free
662 MB
210 MB
Typically I will close Safari and start it again if I get much below 100 MB. I usually have to close Safari at the end of the day to refresh it for the next day. This has only become a problem within the last month or so, and I am at a loss to explain it. I thought it might be Mavericks related (though I have been running Mavericks since its release), but then the Safari I have on my 5 year old Mac Mini running Snow Leopard gives me similar results.
When I run Google Chrome I don't have any of these problems. Indeed, though it is not my preference, I am having to use it more and more for day to day activities or I have to stick with one tab if I am going back and forth between Gmail and other sites. I have not seen this problem reported elsewhere, so I have to believe there is something going on in my system. I have cleared the cache one time on both systems, but that doesn't seem to have made any difference. I would appreciate any comments or suggestions.
-Bill

I would not have even tried this app had I not heard about it on the Mac Rountable podcast (episode #222), where it received favorable comments from otherwise knowledgeable people. It also has a 4.5 star rating on the Mac App Store with 706 5-Star ratings out of 1,049. If you add up the 5-Star and 4-Star ratings you get close to 1,000 favorable rates right there. I have to wonder if people really know what's going on. Since the most obvious detrimental effects for me were centered around using Safari with Gmail on Mavericks, others must not be using that lethal combination. As I mentioned, using Google Chrome does not seem to have any obvious deliterious effects.
Well, there's going to be one more 1-Star rating reflecting my experience.
-Bill

Create thumbnail using excessive memory

I have the following code to read an image (in a file) and create a thumbnail image, writing it to a file:
BufferedImage originalBufferedImage = ImageIO.read(new File(imagePathAndFileName));
int originalWidth = originalBufferedImage.getWidth();
int originalHeight = originalBufferedImage.getHeight();
double scale = 0;
if (((double)75 / originalWidth) <
((double)75 / originalHeight)) {
scale = (double)75 / originalWidth;
} else {
scale = (double)75 / originalHeight;
int width = (int)(originalWidth * scale);
int height = (int)(originalHeight * scale);
BufferedImage newBufferedImage = new BufferedImage(width, height, originalBufferedImage.getType());
Graphics2D graphics2D = newBufferedImage.createGraphics();
Canvas dummyObserver = new Canvas();
Image scaledImage = originalBufferedImage.getScaledInstance(width, height, Image.SCALE_SMOOTH);
graphics2D.drawImage(scaledImage, 0, 0, dummyObserver);
javax.imageio.ImageIO.write(newBufferedImage, fileType, new File(thumbnailPathAndFileName));
With a 1.9 Megabyte image, the call to ImageIO.read() tries to allocate 15 Megabytes of memory, as seen from the log (obtained in WebSphere 5.1 by setting an ALLOCATION_THRESHOLD limit):
Allocation request for 15085072 bytes
at java.awt.image.DataBufferByte.<init>(DataBufferByte.java:87)
at java.awt.image.ComponentSampleModel.createDataBuffer(ComponentSampleModel.java:430)
at java.awt.image.Raster.createWritableRaster(Raster.java:965)
at javax.imageio.ImageTypeSpecifier.createBufferedImage(ImageTypeSpecifier.java:1146)
at javax.imageio.ImageReader.getDestination(ImageReader.java:2868)
at com.sun.imageio.plugins.jpeg.JPEGImageReader.readInternal(JPEGImageReader.java:914)
at com.sun.imageio.plugins.jpeg.JPEGImageReader.read(JPEGImageReader.java:886)
at javax.imageio.ImageIO.read(ImageIO.java:1413)
at javax.imageio.ImageIO.read(ImageIO.java:1299)
Why does it use 15M to read in an image of 1.9M ? Is there a more efficient way to create thumbnail images?

A 15M image correponds to a 5M-pixel RGB 24-bit image. "ImageIO.read" decodes your 1.9M compressed jpeg (beeing roughly a 5Mpixel image, right?) file to a buffered image of some in-memory RGB 24bit format making it consuming 15M. You can get away with using less memory if you can find some ImageIO plugin returning a BufferedImage of type TYPE_CUSTOM with a compressed in-memory representation of the loaded image.
Regards,
Arvid

Flash Player uses excessive memory when in use for a long time.

Good morning,
I'm using firefox with flash player viewing streaming video from www.bloomberg.com/tv/us.The longer this runs the more user memory it uses (from Windows Task Manager, Processes tab).
I had this site running for about 4 houres and at that time it was using 1.7 GB memory and the video was getting eratic. This shows up in a file called "plug-incontainer.exe". I terminated the process and flash player disappeared with a message the said "flash player has crashed".
It doesn't matter if I use Flash Player 10 or 11 or Firefox 3.6 or 21.01.
This also occurs with Internet explorer Ver. 8 except it's manifested in a second instance of Iexplore. Same creeping memory useage.
OS is Windows Xp sp2, processor is a 3GHz hyperthreading P4 with 2GB of installed memory.
I really don't think it should do this.
[email protected]

Was the computer turned off or asleep? It won't hurt to have it taken off. Normally I wouldn't worry about it unless it was going to be a few more months.
Mort

How to see what processes are using my memory?

I recently added more RAM to my system and I always keep Activity Monitor running with the memory usage icon on the Dock to see how much Lion and my programs use.
I noticed that even several CS5 programs running at the same time won't use that much, the program I've seen uses the most is Aperture, using anywhere from 500MB on start to 2.5GB while viewing--not editing--photos.
My questions is, when my system is running normally it uses from a quarter to half the total memory available but just now it's using more than three quarters and it's running not even half programs I use everyday. I quickly added up the memory being used and it's just missing out A LOT. I'm adding a screenshot of Activity Monitor for you to see.
I now that restarting the system (or by using the purge command in Terminal) will free up memory but this really puzzles me and I'd really like to know what's happening--BTW, even though several GB are missing, the computer is nowhere nears slow, at least.
Where are all the other processes using the rest of the memory?
I'm using OS X 10.7.3 Server with 16GB of RAM on an iMac.
Thanks for all your help,
Gustavo.

You will never be able to get those numbers to add up. This topic has come up before. Examples:
Memory used by unknown processes
Where is my memory?
And others. You cannot use the numbers in that display to add up. Even doing top in terminal produces conflicting numbers. Many process are dynamic and may be missed in these displays.
FWIW, here's an apple article on the Activity Monitor memory display:
Using Activity Monitor to read System Memory and determine how much RAM is being used
Editorial: In my opinion I do not recommend always running Activity Monitor (or top). The constant poling and display does have some affect on performance and cpu utilization. That's why it always usually appears near the top of the process list when sorted by percent cpu unless really outweighed by something much bigger.

Getting Bitmaps from files uses excessive memory

When I load a jpg picture as a bitmap I lose a lot of memory that I am unable to recover.
I use the GetBitmapfromfile, the GetBitmapInfo, then GetBitmapData, then DiscardBitmap.
after this I have about 120 M of memory (for a 5 M pixel image) missing that I cannot recover. The size of this lost memory is proportional to the number of pixels in the image.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Kelly
Thanks for your response. I am using CVI 8.1.0. I detect the memory through using windows task manager.
My real problem is that my final application is using too much memory and going into virtual memory too much, when I have been tracing my memory usage I have a lot of memory unaccounted for and I cannot get it back. This happens when I load the bitmap, and cannot be recovered untill my program is stopped.
I have attached some code with pictures to try (use the 2 DSCxxx for comparision to my run). I have also enclosed screen shots so you can see how the memory is used on my PC. Sorry for the large file size, I thought it best to send the same sample photos I have been using.
Attachments:
CVI Test.zip ‏4944 KB

Recently upgraded to 7.0.1 and twice now have had warning that Firefox using excess memory.

Windows XP with 2Gb Ram

As it sounds like you know what you're doing, you know the way that iTunes works. However, because you have not archived/exported (please correct me if you have) your library. There should only be a slight difference between the two.
If you have not already been here, this also has some solutions.
http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/musicstore/lostmusic/
Zach

Starting managed Servers under WLS 8.1 using Operator Role

Hi,
we've configured a user who is acting in the default 'Operator' role.
He can shutdown a managed server using the admin console, but when
trying to restart that managed server via node manager he fails with an exception.
weblogic.management.NoAccessRuntimeException: Access not allowed for subject:
principals=[oper, Operators], on ResourceType: Server Action: write, Target: ExpectedToRun
According to the documentation http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/secwlres/secroles.html
this role should be allowed to start managed servers.
-- What are we doing wrong ? --
Cheers,
Robert

I believe this is a known problem, please contact BEA support for a patch.
Thanks,
-satya
Robert Akolk wrote:
Hi,
we've configured a user who is acting in the default 'Operator' role.
He can shutdown a managed server using the admin console, but when
trying to restart that managed server via node manager he fails with an exception.
weblogic.management.NoAccessRuntimeException: Access not allowed for subject:
principals=[oper, Operators], on ResourceType: Server Action: write, Target: ExpectedToRun
According to the documentation http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/secwlres/secroles.html
this role should be allowed to start managed servers.
-- What are we doing wrong ? --
Cheers,
Robert

Why SCOM 2012 R2 Agent version for Service Manager servers is 6.1.7221.49, why not 7.1.10184.

Hi ,
In SCOM 2012 R2 console if i look at all of my agent managed servers have agent builds of 7.1.10184 but my two service manager servers have agent builds of 6.1.7221.49
Can anyone let me know is this known issue or how can we upgrade the agent to correct version.
Thanks in advance
Bharath

Hi,
SCOM and SCSM are built on the same structure, Management Servers and DAta Warehouse etc. This means that when you install the SCSM Management Server, the Microsoft Monitoring Agent is also installed. When
you want to monitor Service Manager and the server it´s installed on, you need to configure the SCOM parameters from the control panel at the SCSM management server.
If you were to try and install the SCOM agent at the SCSM server, it would fail and tell you that you can´t install the agent on a server where Service Manager is installed. The agent will be upgraded when
you upgrade Service Manager so this is all expected and It´s as it should be :)
Regards,
Daniel
IT Consultant at Viridis IT

Run Admin Server with multiple Managed Servers each using different userid?

We currently run separate WebLogic domain instances for each business application in a Unix environment. Each one is created using a unix userid unique to that application and which owns all the files and is used to run the process when that particular WebLogic instance is started up. We have run this way for a while.
I am considering altering our approach to the one that is recommended, i.e. in our Production environment we would run a single Admin instance with numerous managed servers. One issue I'm stuck on is the fact that in our current environment, each application has a different unix userid that owns the files making up the WebLogic domain instance and that WebLogic instance is run under that userid.
I've investigated and experimented using WebLogic 10.3 preview and WebLogic 10.0, but I haven't been able to determine what I have to do to make each managed server's files and processes belong to a different unix userid, if that is even possible.
Is there a way, using the recommended approach, where there is a single Admin instance that has multiple managed servers whose files and processes are owned by different unique, unix userids?
If not, how would you separate access to each of the Managed Servers so that the programmers who maintain them don't have access to Managed Servers that they are not responsible for?
Thanks for any help or suggestions.....

Hi:
I played with this stuff and I found that this will work, without the Location elements:
<IfModule mod_weblogic.c>
MatchExpression /app1 WebLogicHost=server1|WebLogicPort=7003
MatchExpression /app2 WebLogicHost=server2|WebLogicPort=7003
</IfModule>
Also this will work too, with no entries inside the IfModule element:
<Location /app1 >
SetHandler weblogic-handler
WebLogicHost server1
WebLogicPort 7003
</Location>
<Location /app2 >
SetHandler weblogic-handler
WebLogicHost server2
WebLogicPort 7003
</Location>

ITunes and its support programs, iTunesHelper AppleMobleDeviceService.exe, are using up an excessive amount of system resource. What is causing this and how can I fix it?.exe and

iTunesHelper.exe and AppleMobiledeviceService.exe are doing some disturbing things:
-They are starting automatically on system startup,
-They are using excessive system resources (AppleMobileDeviceService.exe was using 50% of my CPU, and this without me plugging in a device or opening iTunes.),
-I cannot find them under the Programs Menu in Control Panel, meaning, I cannot uninstall them.
iTunes itself is using more system resources than I would expect. If these issues continue without a reasonable fix, I will have to consider iTunes to be malware and iTunesHelper.exe and AppleMobileDeviceService.exe to be trojans, and treat them as such.

Hey, nfcopier: ripping the executable and dynamic link library out by the roots is worth considering, thanks. It took me until tonight to find a thread similar to my own. For some reason Apple doesn't want to be known for its bloated, intractable software. W*T*F*, Apple? How hard is it conceive a pilot program which starts everything and shuts it off when it's not necessary? It's got to be do-able.

3 management servers (500 agents) are using excessive memory

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for