32 bit oracle on 64 bit OS

Hi Everyone,
I just wanted to know whether is it possible to run 32 bit Oracle on 64 bit based Operating Systems.
Regards,
Bharath.

Hi Bharath;
I belive its beter way to download Linux (64-bit) stage and use this stage for installation.(Its not avaliable on edelivery,contact with your local oracle office or log SR for stage DVD)
If you want to test your stage on 64 bit please refer:
MD5 Checksums for R12.0.4 Rapid Install Media [ID 728000.1] (Section 1: Overview)
Please follow below and see its helpful:
http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/2006/05/64bit_support_for_the_ebusines.html
Also check:
Oracle Applications Installation and Upgrade Notes Release 12 (12.0.4) for Linux (64-bit) [ID 416305.1]
Regard
Helios

Similar Messages

Installing 32 bit oracle on 64 bit windows 7

My oracle application works only with 32 bit oracle.Now I need to install the application on a 64 bit windows 7.I tried installing oracle 11g 32 bit database on this machine(64 bit windows 7).During the final stages,it gave an error that the listener service has not started.When I checked the Services status in Computer Management->Services,I found that the listener has already started.I closed the error message and continued with installation.The installation completed successfully.But when I login to sql plus with my oracle database(SYSTEM/SYSTEM@MYHOSTNAME),it is giving tns error ORA 12541-TNS NO LISTENER.I tried every possible ways like restarting the service, and deleting the listener and creating it again,but still it doesnt work.
If anyone has faced the same problem,please give me solution.
I cannot try installing 64 bit oracle because my application is not compatible with 64 bit oracle.
Edited by: 1001322 on Apr 20, 2013 7:22 AM
Edited by: 1001322 on Apr 20, 2013 7:23 AM

1001322 wrote:
My oracle application works only with 32 bit oracle.Now I need to install the application on a 64 bit windows 7.I tried installing oracle 11g 32 bit database on this machine(64 bit windows 7).During the final stages,it gave an error that the listener service has not started.When I checked the Services status in Computer Management->Services,I found that the listener has already started.I closed the error message and continued with installation.The installation completed successfully.But when I login to sql plus with my oracle database(SYSTEM/SYSTEM@MYHOSTNAME),it is giving tns error ORA 12541-TNS NO LISTENER.I tried every possible ways like restarting the service, and deleting the listener and creating it again,but still it doesnt work.
If anyone has faced the same problem,please give me solution.
I cannot try installing 64 bit oracle because my application is not compatible with 64 bit oracle.
Edited by: 1001322 on Apr 20, 2013 7:22 AM
Edited by: 1001322 on Apr 20, 2013 7:23 AMIn addition to the other comments, you need to make the distinction between the oracle database and the oracle client.
the application interacts directly with the oracle client software. The application should not know or care about the word length of the database.

Can I install 32-bit Oracle on 64-bit os

Dear Gurus
I have installed windows-7 (64-bit) home basic OS.
Can I Install Oracle 10g (32-bit) software on above OS.
Thanking in advance
Sanjeev

Hello,
I have installed windows-7 (64-bit) home basic OS.
Can I Install Oracle 10g (32-bit) software on above OS.Why don't you try to install Oracle *10.2.0.5* for Windows 7 - 64 bit ?
I think it is safer and you could benefit fully of the 64 bit advantage (large SGA,...).
Anyway, you'll have to do this installation in 2 steps:
- Installation of Oracle 10.2.0.4
- Application of the Patch Set 10.2.0.5
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/database/10204-winx64-vista-win2k8-082253.html
Hope this help.
Best regards,
Jean-Valentin

32 bit oracle in 64 bit OS and issues

Hi All,
Good morning, I installed windows 7 (64 bit) and installed oracle 10g 10.2.0.1.0 version. previously when I was used vista the ojdbc14.jar driver worked fine and able to access the DB using this driver. now I am getting the below error as:
=====
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: D:\oraclexe\app\oracle\product\10.2.0\server\BIN\ocijdbc10.dll: Can't load IA 32-bit .dll on a AMD 64-bit platform
at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(Unknown Source)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CConnection$1.run(T2CConnection.java:3139)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CConnection.loadNativeLibrary(T2CConnection.java:3135)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CConnection.logon(T2CConnection.java:221)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.PhysicalConnection.<init>(PhysicalConnection.java:439)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CConnection.<init>(T2CConnection.java:132)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T2CDriverExtension.getConnection(T2CDriverExtension.java:78)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver.connect(OracleDriver.java:801)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(Unknown Source)
at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(Unknown Source)
at DBPrime.main(DBPrime.java:14)
=====
Please guide me to avoid this issue. What driver I have to use to get rid of this or am I use another version like 64 bit oracle for this.
Bhargava S Akula.

absriram wrote:
Actually I am facing this issue due to 64 bit. its not OS specific.Do you mean you had this working on 32 bit Windows 7?
many of the production support systems are running on 64 bit processors.My point was not related to 32 bit or 64 bit but running Oracle software on an unsupported platform.

Difference between Oracle 10g 64 bit /Oracle 10g 32 Bit Windows

Hi all
We are using 10g Oracle 32 Bit windows as well as Oracle 10g 64 Windows at some installations.
Now we tested these two systems in our office for Testing purpose on two similar machines i.e
Intel i3 with 4 GB RAM. Database size approx 4GB
We had the feeling that :-
a) Oracle datafile Filesize limitation may be there in 32 Bit system but we saw that physically around 3.5 GB datafile size
is created in 32 Bit windows also
b) Data Fetching Speed -.We thought that data fetching speed would be higher in 64 Bit machine. But we proved to
be wrong. Our sample data had approx 7 Millions records (based on Client Live data for 3 years) total in around 20 transaction tables. Further there were other additional 100-150 tables but very smaller ones just master tables
We used the same client end machine and same Front end and same queries on both servers. To our surpriise - We got the almost similar results in terms of data fetching time in both the 32 Bit as well as 64 Bit windows with similar Oracle 10g 32 bit and Oracle 64 Bit respectively
Further we find that Anti Virus Programme which may be any say Symatentic or other - troubles much more in Windows 64 Bit environment as compared to Windows 32 Bit environment from settings point of view.
Kindly advise as to
a) Whether our above observations are correct
b) Now under what situations should we use Oracle 10g 64 Windows as compared to Oracle 10g 32 Bit windows
Regards
Suresh Bansal

Hi Suresh;
Pelase check below link which could give you idea about your issue:
Comparison of 32-bit and 64-bit Oracle Database on windows
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/solutions/oracle_performance_em64t_6850.pdf
Regard
Helios

Accessing 64-bit Oracle from 32-bit ODBC

Hi
I am installing a software using 32-bit ODBC for connection to Oracle.
The server has been installed by our client and has the following specs:
- AMD Opteron Processor 280
- Windows server 2003 R2 Standard x64 Edition SP2
- Oracle 10g Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit
- Both a 32-bit and a 64-bit client has been installed
Using the 32-bit ODBC administrator I can add the "Oracle in OraClient10g_home1" driver, but I can't find the right database, only lots of other databases our client has on other servers.
If I go to the 64-bit ODBC administrator I can find the right database and noting else, using the driver "Oracle in OraClient_home".
How can I get the 32-bit ODBC client to connect to the 64-bit database?
Regards
Leidulf

Hi
I did that, I entered the following into the tnsnames.ora, as this was how it was entered in the 64-bit client:
DKMVKK =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = krhsrvora02)(PORT = 1521))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVICE_NAME = DKMVKK)
Now I find this in the 32-bit ODBC administrator and the "Test Connection" is successful. And fails if I enter the wrong password, so I know it is correct.
But still I can't connect using the software that worked well on the previous server (32-bit), and using the same credentials and database name. I also have installed an independent SQL viewer that connects via ODBC, this does not work either, getting the ORA-12154.
I have also tried to change the HOST to the IP address with no luck.
The database and the client runs on the same machine.
What can be the problem?
Regards
Lediulf

Is it possible to use dataguard between 64 bit oracle and 32 bit oracle

primary db 64 bit oracle (10g r2)
standby db 32 bit oracle (10g r2)
is it possible to crate such a data protection solution with data guard that works
thanks for your reply

Hi,
Here is a related thread, with comments by the author of the Oracle Data Guard book:
http://dba.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=1064
The main requirement is Oracle software and O/S should be exactly same on primary and standby hosts.
So you will need to install Linux 32 bit and same oracle software on both machines. I am not aware of any other modification that you will need.
The chipset can be different as long as the O/S is same on both the hosts as I/O calls are created by O/S and are not dependent on chipset.
Hope this help . . .
Don Burleson
http://www.dba-oracle.com

64-bit vs 32-bit Oracle on Win2003

Background:
Ive been tasked to come up with the appropriate hardware/software solution for my company, an MMOLG (Massively Multiple On-Line Gaming) enterprise as it gets ramped up for two huge game releases. We use My SQL (4.x) for managing the Web Front-end, MS SQL 2000 Servers to manage the games, and Oracle to manage the billing application on the back-end. The billing application is also used for authentication (registration of new subscribers, credit card validations) and authorization (what games each subscriber can play, is their account up to date, etc.). We currently support our billing application using 32-bit Oracle (9.2.0.4) on 32-bit, clustered Win2k, using Failsafe (3.3.2) on MSCS (1.0). We have the first new game-to-be-released in Beta, and, to date, I have a similar setup except that the Oracle is 9.2.0.6, Failsafe is 3.3.3, and MSCS is 1.1. Originally, I was given to understand that each of the two new games were to be on separate Oracle instances, but now my management wants both games to be run from the same instance. Our Marketing team spit out the anticipated subscriber/subscription #s recently, and the size of the #s has given me pause I question whether or not our current system will be able to handle the # of logins (for authorization and authentication) during the so-called land-rush (the games 1st week/month of release) and that period of time immediately following an upgrade to the game (where huge #s of gamers rush to get back to playing). I also need to consider the peak # of logins during the heaviest play period times. The minimum # of gamer logins/hour I need to account for is 5-7k/hour, and the high end could be upwards of 30-45k/hour (for both games, post-upgrade case). To me, that number of logins/hour is asking a lot Windows 32-bit, perhaps the impossible.
What Ive done to date:
First I made sure that I understood what I can do with Windows, and then implemented a base test on the Beta environment by setting up Windows for VLM management. I have both the /PAE and /3GB switches enabled (I have 8GB of RAM, so the /3GB switch gets me the extra 1GB memory for shared_pool w/o being the hindrance it would be if I was using 16GB+), and I have the AWE tailored to 768MB (the minimum that, via trial and error, that I could bring Oracle up under). This has allowed me to have a shared_pool of 320MB, a java_pool and large_pool of 152MB (more on the large_pool later). To date, Ive sized the buffer_cache at 5000MB (just to prove that I could do it, and see the results). So SGA is 5362MB. Ive set the Aggregate PGA Target to 256MB.
Ive looked at 64-bit Oracle on 64-bit Win2003. 64-bit Oracle 9.2.0.7 is certified on Win2003 (Itanium only, no certification yet for the really spiffy EM64T chip set). If dedicated will not cut it for the max login load, I could consider Shared mode, knowing that I get some performance hit. Going to 64-bit Theres some test data out there (Larry Pedigo, of Performance Tuning Corp. had a nice white paper), but Ive found little else. This seems, at first blush, the best choice for a Windows shop, but who knows? Ive come across one gotcha to date, the Failsafe Manager is only 32-bit (while Failsafe is 64-bit, why Oracle did that, I do not know), so has to be installed on a separate home, on a separate 32-bit Windows machine. Ive gotten it from Oracle Support that 32-bit Oracle Client will connect w/o issue to the 64-bit Oracle server, so having the various 32-bit applications used (on separate 32-bit Win2k machines) connect to the database is not a problem.
Ive looked at putting 32-bit Oracle on a 64-bit Win2003, so if the initial load/stress tests fails (at 5-7k logins/hour) I could easily migrate Oracle to the 64-bit. From what Ive read, I would expect the 32-bit Oracle to be way too slow.
Ive looked at going to RAC as it would buy me twice the memory for the pools.
Im just starting to look at moving to Oracle on UNIX. I have yet to estimate the total cost for doing so (early guess-timate is $750k), and Id have to bring a Unix Sys Admin on-board. Up to now, Turbine has been 90% Windows, 10% Linux.
Questions for the group:
Has anyone out there had this problem to tackle?
Am I correct in thinking that Windows 32-bit would be swamped by the anticipated load?
Is anyone running 64-bit Oracle on 64-bit Win2003? If so, did you get what you expected with respect to performance? Any obstacles that you had to overcome?
Has anyone suggestions as to configuration/environment that would help me?
Any responses would be a God-send to this poor, beleaguered DBA. Thanks very much (in advance).

Wow, you have a big task at hand, and it looks very fun to build.
I say you should consider 10g r2, as it will soon (or maybe already released) run on the AMD Opteron and the EM64T now that windows 2003 is set up for these processors.
If you are not ready to go 10g, then I would seriously consider RAC for the 9i database.
and I wouldn't install 32 bit on 64bit machine. Its not supported and would give you less than desirable results
Message was edited by:
acrlewis

Oracle Client 64-bit and Oracle Client 32-bit on the same server

Hi,
I have a Windows 2008 server 64-bit with Oracle Client 64-bit and Oracle Client 32-bit installed on different directories (D:\Oracle and D:\Oracle32)
Is it possible to define for certain applications to use the TNSNAMES entry from the 64-bit Oracle Client
and for other applications to use the TNSNAMES entry from the 32-bit Oracle Client
Once I installed the Oracle Client 32-bit (Oracle Client 64-bit version was already installed) and restarted the server I performed a TNSPING and it defaulted to the Oracle Client 32-bit installation path
Thanks,
Barry

Hello,
When you install a new client on a server, it will update the PATH variable, and add the ORACLE_HOME\bin path to it, at the first place. That explains why the tnsping use the last installed ORACLE_HOME.
What you can do if you want only to change the default path to the tnsnames is to set the environment variable TNS_ADMIN to the path where the tnsnames you want to use is located. You can modify this variable in your application if you want to use another tnsnames.
If you want switch from 32 bits to 64 bits client, then you have to modify the PATH variable.
Hope this will help.
Best regards,
Sylvie

32 bit vs 64 bit oracle

Hi all,
I know 64 bit Processer has a an ablity to address larger memory than the 32 bit Processer.
My doubt is
1) What is the difference between 32 bit OS and a 64 bit OS.
2) What is the difference between 32 bit oracle and 64 bit oracle.
Can we install 32 bit on a 64 bit and vice versa.
Can someone throw some light on this.

Hi;
Similar issue discussed here many times. Please use search mechanisim.
Please see:
https://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?threadID=&q=32+bit+vs+64+bit&objID=c18&dateRange=all&userID=&numResults=15
Regard
Helios

Install Oracle DB 32-bit on Windows 2003 Server EM64T

I need to know if i can install Oracle 10.1.0.3 32 bit or 10gR2 32 bit on Windows
Standard Edition 2003 64 with Intel Xeon -64 bit?
Tks,
Elber

You must use the 64 bit edition. Only 10gR2 64bit is certified for this platform, 10gR1 was not produced for 64 bits and the 32bit edition is not supported.
From the Certify Matrix it states "Running 32-bit applications on a 64-bit operating system is generally referred to as "Compatibility-Mode" by many AMD64/EM64T hardware vendors. Irrespective of this terminology, 32-bit Oracle Database server is *not* certified on Windows x64. For the 32-bit Oracle database client, check the certification matrix for more details.".
~ Madrid
http://hrivera99.blogspot.com/

Migration from Oracle 9i 32 bit to Oracle 10G 64 bit on Windows 2003 Server

I am working on migrating Oracle 9i 32 bit to Oracle 10G 64 bit on Windows 2003 from Old server to new server. We have db around 500 GB and 3 schemas. I installed Oracle 10G on new server, created tablespaces, schema's blah blah and now doing export and import at schema level from old server to new server.
Import is taking more than 4 to 5 hours on new server. My manager is saying, window time is bit longer and he wants me to try possiblities to make this process faster. Can some one help me on this, to use the best possible method to complete this process faster?
Will below step work, if I try?
If I install, oracle 9i and 10g both on new server in different home directories and take the hot backup from old machine and restore on new machine in 9i home directory and use the upgrade configuration assistant from 10g and do the upgrade? Pls advice.
Thanks in advance,
Hari babu
Edited by: user6367891 on Mar 2, 2010 5:28 AM

It looks good.
I have one question in below steps:
To migrate an Oracle9i or older database to an Oracle Database 10g Release 1 (10.1) database for 64-bit Windows:
1 Perform steps 1 - 11 in "Migrating an Oracle Database 10g Release 1 (10.1) Database".
2 Shut down the database on the 64-bit computer:
SQL> SHUTDOWN IMMEDIATE;
3 Start the database migration:
SQL> STARTUP MIGRATE;
4 Migrate the database as described in Chapter 3, "Upgrading a Database to the New Oracle Database 10g Release" in Oracle Database Upgrade Guide.
In step 4, it says, migrate database as described in chapter 3. In chapter 3, it says, to do the upgrade the process using dbca or manually. Pls confirm whether do the upgrade process after issuing startup migrate or not.
Thanks in advance.

Moving a 32 bit Oracle 9i database to 64 bit on a different server

Hello,
We have a 24 GB database with Oracle 9.2.0.7 (32 bit). As the hardware of this server is getting obsolete, it is planned to move this instance to another server, which has 64 bit Oracle software of same version (9.2.0.7). In this scenario what is the best way to move the instance?
Is it only the full export from 32 bit server and import into 64 bit server(after creating the instance there)?
Since this is a 24 GB database, and target server is 8 gb of ram, any pointers on how long the import process can take?
There is a documentation to change word size, I can run utlirp.sql as suggested here:
http://www.orafaq.com/forum/?t=rview&goto=258668#msg_258668
But I have some doubts as I mentioned in that post. Can you please share your suggestions?
Thanks,
Nirav

Hi
Is there some document or steps to follow when creating the instance on the new server The database move is easy, and here is one way to move the schema, fast:
http://www.dba-oracle.com/oracle_tips_db_copy.htm
And then, you just run the script to change the wordsize for 64-bit:
Also, after your migration, watch out for common performance issues:
http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_bad_poor_performance_upgrade_migration_32_64_bit.htm
Also, note that Oracle has changed the optimizer costing model from "IO" to CPU" in 10g, and shops that combine an upgrade to 64-bit servers with a 10g migration may want to look at changing the new default for _optimizer_cost_model.
Going 64-bit means that you can now allocate very large RAM data buffers and increase your shared_pool_size above two gigabytes. However, it is important to remember that there are downsides to having a super-large db_cache_size. While direct access to data is done with hashing, there are times when the database must examine all of the blocks in the RAM cache. These types of database may not always benefit from an upgrade to a 64 bit server:
Systems with high Invalidations: Whenever a program issues a truncated table, uses temporary tables, or runs a large data purge, Oracle must sweep all of the blocks in the db_cache_size to remove dirty blocks. This can cause excessive overhead for system with a db_cache_size greater than 10 gigabytes.
High Update Systems: The database writer (DBWR) process must sweep all of the blocks in db_cache_size when performing an asynchronous write. Having a huge db_cache_size can cause excessive work for the database writer. Some shops dedicate a separate, smaller data buffer (of a different blocksize) for high-update objects.
RAC systems: Oracle RAC and Grid does not perform optimally with super-large data buffer RAM, as available in 64-bit systems. You may experience high cross-instance calls when using a large db_cache_size in multiple RAC instances. This inter-instance "pinging" can cause excessive overhead, and that is why RAC DBA's try to segregate RAC instances to access specific areas of the database. This is why Oracle 10g grid server blades generally contain only 4-gig RAM.
Hope this helps. . .
Don Burleson
Oracle Press author
Author of “Oracle Tuning: The Definitive Reference”
http://www.dba-oracle.com/bp/s_oracle_tuning_book.htm

SAP BI-BO Integration for "BO XI 3.1 on HP-Unix-PA-RISC-64 bit"+Oracle WAS

Hi,
We have set up SAP Integration Kit to integrate SAP BI 7.0 and BO XI
3.1. Our BO system is set up on Unix HP-UX-PA-RISC 64 BIT and Oracle Web Application Server
10.1.3.
When we are creating a WebI report using WebI Rich Client, we are able
to fetch the data from SAP BI Query and also refresh the data using
WebI Rich Client (Desktop).
When we are creating a WebI report from Infoview, we are able to create
the WebI report,but we get the database error "Unable to Bind to
NetworkLayer Object"
(WIS 10901)" when trying to Run the Query i.e.
fetch the data from SAP BI Query. Same error is also there when we try
to refresh the data from Infoview for a WebI report created using WebI
Rich Client (Desktop).
We raised an OSS Message with SAP. We got a response that :
====================================================================
The reason you're having this problem seems to be because you don't have the SAP dataAccess library (libdbd_sap.so) and its equivalent config files (sap folder).
Those are the files that manage the connection from BOE queries to SAP.
You can check that they exist in your Windows client fine(.dll).
Here's what I have in my HP-UX system:
$ ls -l sap
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 4671488 Sep 13 2008 libdbd_sap.so
sap:
total 80
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 4650 Sep 13 2008 sapen.cod
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 358 Sep 13 2008 sap.prm
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 10670 Sep 13 2008 sap.rss
-rwxr-xr-x 1 xi31 users 1343 Sep 13 2008 sap.sbo
These drivers are not installed with the SAP Kit but with the BOE setup
itself - meaning you can have a system without SAP Kit but with these drivers.
On the other hand, with SAP Kit, you can have other features such as your working SAP authentication fine but not this one since it comes with BOE.
====================================================================
Request the SDN Community to check the below mentioned :
Platform : HP-UX-PA-RISC 64 bit
Oracle WAS (instead of Tomcat).
1) Which installer was used to install BOE XI 3.1 ?
2) Is the BOE XI 3.1 base installer available for HP-UX-PA-RISC-64 bit ? I could not find one at SAP Service Market place (the nearest one is for HPP - 32 Bit)
3) Do you have the relevant SAP Folder & Drivers on this path, as per the above SAP OSS Message.
4) Any inputs on how to resolve the issue (we have so-far tried with 4 different installers for HP-UX-PA-RISC and not got any success)
regards,
Rajesh K Sarin

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
(A) We have attempted with BOE and SAP Integration Kit in the sequence. My earlier communication has all the attachments for the steps followed, and the SAP message.
(B) We have HP-UX-PA-RISC-64 bit. Request to please point us to the correct installer on this link
(C) We have done 4 complete trials :
1) BOE XI 3.0 Installer provided by BO Consultant, 6 months back & rest downloaded from SAP Service Market Place.
BOE XI 3.0 --> Upgrade to BOE XI 3.1 --> BOE FP 1.2 for XI 3.1 --> SAP Integration Kit for BOE XI 3.1 --> Integration Kit FP 1.2 --> Oracle WAS Manual deployment steps
2) BOE XI 3.0 Installer & rest downloaded from SAP Service Market Place.
BOE XI 3.0 --> SAP Integration Kit for BOE XI 3.0 --> Oracle WAS manual deployment steps
3) BOE XI 3.1 Installer for HP-UX-PA-RISC-32bit (HPP) & rest downloaded from SAP Service Market Place.
BOE XI 3.1 --> SAP Integration Kit for BOE XI 3.1 --> Oracle WAS manual deployment steps
4) BOE XI 3.1 Installer provided by SAP OSS Support & rest downloaded from SAP Service Market Place.
BOE XI 3.1 --> SAP Integration Kit for BOE XI 3.1 --> Oracle WAS manual deployment steps
None of these steps have helped us.
SAP OSS Support asked us to check availability of the "SAP Folder" and "Lib / driver" files on the Connection Server Directory; which would appear once BOE XI 3.1 installer is installed (ONLY BASE Install, SAP Integration Kit is not needed).
We have also confirmed this with one another Client / Project. They have HP-UX-Itanium-64 bit and BOE-XI 3.1 only base install (No SAP Integration kit). This particular SAP Folder / Drivers are available without any SAP Integration kit.
Request to correct me, if I am wrong :
SAP Integration kit additionally provides the drivers needed for Crystal & SAP Authentication.
regards,
Rajesh K Sarin

32 bit Oracle database 10g to 64 bit Oracle Database 11g on Windows 2008

Hi everybody,
I'm going to move and upgrade my 32 bit Oracle database server 10g to another 64 bit windows 2008 server.
New database server will be 64 bit Oracle database server 11g.
Somebody told me export import doesn't carry archieve logs therefore is there any way to move and upgrade the database without any lost?
Thanks for your help

I'm going to move and upgrade my 32 bit Oracle database server 10g to another 64 bit windows 2008 server.
New database server will be 64 bit Oracle database server 11g.
Somebody told me export import doesn't carry archieve logs therefore is there any way to move and upgrade the database without any lost?Yes, in export/import, you will create a new database and import. The question is why you want to prefer export/import?
is it source database 32bit is in different OS platform? If not directly after installation you can upgrade the database. using DBUA

32 bit oracle on 64 bit OS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for