34 pages at 13 topics per page

As stated 34 pages at 13 topics per page of my ipod does not play sound out headphone jack or other accesories. Dear mac I have the same exact problem. No sound out jack nor accesories and my ipod is now 4 months out of warranty. I am extremly gentle with my ipod which sits in a rubber case and never leaves that case. With this many people having the same exact problem why dont you do a recall and find a solution? I am a very loyal customer, I own two ipods and a imac. I also converted my girlfriend and her family over to mac users. With many people out there who have bought way more mac products than I, why would you not take care of us and recall this issue with the ipod? I got the same answer from both the store and your customer care, "sorry nothing we can do but service it, which cost as much as the ipod itself." Please offer some insight on this issue.
Sincerly
Ipod 30 gig video   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   no sound

"is now 4 months out of warranty"
You waited until it was out of warranty before you tried to plug in headphones?
I strongly recommend you buy from either a store that has a two or three year guarantee on electronics they sell (Best Buy) which you can buy for about $54, or, get Apple's extended warranty. Either way, you get more time to explore your iPod and make sure it is solid and okay.
I've learned this the hard way also.
- Ken

Similar Messages

  • Topics per Page in Discussion

    Hi everyone
    I would like to change the default number of Topics per Page when going into a discussion. As default the number of Topics per page is set to 5 and number of posts per discussion is set to 3 (Would like 10 and if possible show as tree view)
    Can anyone help??
    Kind Regards
    Ole

    Hello
    Plus the information I already got here (concerning the number of topics per page) I wonder if there's a way to change the look-and-feel and the commands in the KM Discussion iview. I have a requirement to disable some features, as for instance "Send To" and "Add to Favorites".
    It can sound strange, but the customer ask me to check this possibility.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Fernando Cervantes
    PS. Sorry, I realized that the answer for this was some posts before...thanks again Detlev...
    Message was edited by: Fernando Cervantes

  • Loaded a dynamic page repeately in different versions

    hello everybody,
    in my application the user navigates to a jsf page X into which my code adds components dynamically. this works beautifully. however, when the user navigates to another jsf page and then returns to page X, my code has to add additional buttons to page X. this works in the display of the browser, however, it turns out that internally the systems still holds the previous version of page X. thus, as soon as the user presses onto one of the new buttons, no code behind is executed, instead the browser redisplays the previous version of page X!
    we have checked everything, we tried holding the page in the application and also in the request scope, nothing helps. The code for dynamically adding buttons is correct and hand has been cross-checked several times.
    in use: tomohawk 1.1.6, jsf sun implementation 1.1, tomcat 5.5.20.
    thanks for advance for any advice!

    Oh, you're the same one as in this topic: [http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5312417].
    Please don't doublepost topics over and over again. Stick to one topic per problem. Otherwise you're wasting other's effort in posting answers which are already given and which you didn't mention in the topicstart.

  • Topic Design/Structure = Speed of updating content in project

    1. Yes, we do incorporate screen captures in our topics, and
    I have streamlined as much as I can, stripping out all duplicates
    and linking to the source.
    2. I do realize that by use of the pop-up images, which I use
    a lot, it does impact the speed simply by virtue of the image size.
    3. MY question is this: I was hired to maintain a system that
    already exists and have taught myself a lot of streamlining
    features but am sure there are others I'm not aware of. I was just
    wondering if maybe there was a better design structure I could
    apply to improve the efficiency of the topics. Here is our current
    structure:
    1 Main project under which all other projects (CHM) are
    linked as Merged Topics.
    300+ Topics - each one creating a separate CHM that is then
    merged into the main project
    Some of these individual topics are quite large (we have 1
    topic per screen/feature). I have broken out as much as I can into
    common topics and link to those rather than repeating information;
    but even with that, I still have some huge ones such as the one I'm
    working today.
    It is taking like 1 minute at times from clicking "Insert
    hyperlink" till I get the dialog to select the bookmark and several
    minutes just for the topic to open or compile.
    I've come across terms such as "Page" "Topic" "Book" "Pane"
    etc, and was just wondering if maybe we need to tweak our
    underlying structure to improve in this area. Any suggestions?
    Thanks a heap!

    Welcome to our community
    Sounds like RoboHelp would certainly fit the bill for what you are seeking. Basically it works as follows:
    You maintain all the content on your local PC.
    You then Generate a Web Based output such as WebHelp, FlashHelp or AIR Help (Web Based).
    Once the output has been created, you publish it to the Web location.
    So perhaps you add a few pages and change some others.
    You make those changes in your local copy of RoboHelp and Generate the Web Based output again.
    You then publish the output to the Web location to populate the updates.
    The first time you publish output ALL the content has to be copied across. But at that time, RoboHelp makes a list of what files were copied.
    Subsequent publish operations only copy the files that need to be copied. So the first time through it may take a few minutes to copy all the content. But subsequent publish cycles should take just a brief while. Often, just a few seconds.
    Cheers... Rick
    Helpful and Handy Links
    RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
    Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 moments from now - $24.95!
    Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
    SorcererStone Blog
    RoboHelp eBooks

  • RH7: Map ID and Frame Topic-Splitting

    Greetings. Hope someone could help with the following:
    I've created a very simple Frame file with two 'Heading2'
    paragraphs and a handful of other paragraphs types to describe
    contents.
    For illustration purposes, let's say the Map file I have
    received form my developer has exactly two entries:
    HIDD_APP_PREF_FIRST_DIALOG 0x200E8
    HIDD_APP_PREF_SECOND_DIALOG 0x200E9
    At the beginning of each paragraph I have inserted a custom
    marker with the name 'HelpMarker'.
    (Question 1) What is the exact text that should go in each
    marker text box?
    When I add my Frame file by reference, I specify 'HelpMarker'
    in the 'Define Context-Sensitive Help Marker' text box.
    In the 'Style Settings' dialog...
    -- I specify 'H2' as the 'User-Defined HTML Tag'
    -- I check 'Heading 2' for pagination settings and click
    'Finish'.
    Once the Frame file has been processed I have only one topic.
    I would expect to have two.
    (Question 2) What should be done differently to have one
    topic per 'Heading 2' paragraph type in my original Frame document/
    When done

    First the answer to your following question
    (b) Must I manually match the hypertext marker with a topic
    using the 'Edit Map IDs Dialog'?
    Yes, you are correct in the understanding that "this is the
    traditional way of accomplishing the required task". So, this is
    one possible way but this can be done in a better way using
    FrameMaker integration feature.
    It provides a different automated flow for creating Context
    Sesitive Help map IDs which is discussed below.
    So coming to your another question
    (a) Does the marker 'automatically' map the topic if the
    string it contains forms a match with an entry in the .hm file
    provided by the developer?
    The answer to this question is "No. Although it works
    automatically but not in this manner."
    There is a little difference in the flow that RoboHelp
    provides and the approach that your developer and help author are
    expecting.
    According to my understanding here is your developer and help
    author's approach. Please correct me if my understanding is not
    right.
    1. Developer uses Map IDs in his application.
    2. He puts all the Map IDs along with their values in a .hm
    file.
    3. That .hm file is provided to the help author.
    4. Help author is suppossed to make use of those Map IDs
    present in the .hm file in the Context Sensitive Help he develops.
    5. Help author inserts those Map IDs in the marker text in
    FrameMaker document(s) and expects RoboHelp to make use of the same
    .hm file as provided by the developer for mapping.
    Here is the flow in RoboHelp.
    1. Help Author inserts his own Map IDs as marker text in the
    FrameMaker document. (e.g. HIDD_APP_PREF_FIRST_DIALOG)
    2. Help Author mentions the name of the marker in RoboHelp
    during Add/Import of FrameMaker document.
    3. RoboHelp reads the marker, marker text and the document
    content and generates Context Sensitive Help Map IDs. It also
    generates a .h (equivalent to .hm) file.
    4. This .h file is provided by the help author to the
    developer to be used in his application.
    As we can see in one approach .h file is generated first and
    in the second flow .h file is generated at the end.
    As of now, one possible way is to use the RoboHelp's approach
    and ask the developer to use RoboHelp generated map ID file.
    Another possible way is
    1. Create a copy of the .hm file provided by the developer
    and convert it to the following format
    #define HIDD_APP_PREF_FIRST_DIALOG 0x200E8
    #define HIDD_APP_PREF_SECOND_DIALOG 0x200E9
    2. Close the RoboHelp project.
    3. Rename the above copy of file with the RoboHelp's CSH
    mapping file(BSSCDefault.h by default). And replace Robohelp's
    mapping file with this copy.
    4. Open the project and you will find the map ids as provided
    by the developer.
    And answer to your following query
    Could you please explain each class of entry that I see here
    and how they are to be used in this context?
    Robohelp's Edit Map IDs functionality is a RoboHelp's generic
    functionaliity and is not specific to FrameMaker integration
    feature.
    A help author using FrameMaker integration feature need not
    open this dialog ever if he uses the RoboHelp's approach as
    described above.
    However, for other users this feature provides the
    funcionality of creating Context Sensitive Help for any topic or
    bookmark present in the project.
    Since, topics and bookmarks generated during a FrameMaker
    document Add/Import are no different from the generic topics and
    bookmarks in RoboHelp, they are also listed and can be mapped from
    the dialog.
    Mayank
    RoboHelp Team

  • JMS Topics translate to Queues behind the scenes?

    Hi There:
    In discussing JMS implementation with coworkers I found someone mention that even if we created topics and have users subscribed to those topics, those topics get translated into individual queues per topic per user. So the queue in affect gets subscribed to the topic and the user is actually subscribed to the queue. While I can imagine that this kind of implementation makes sense for reliable delivery, I find it hard to believe that this is the way JMS implements topics internally.
    Can someone throw some lite on this please?

    RajMap wrote:
    Well the content gets replicated to the queues when it is not necessary to do that. If I am not doing reliable delivery, then the message that is published to the topic is delivered to the users that are subscribed to the topic at the point in time, and to do that I do not see the need to implement it via queues. Like I mentioned before for reliable delivery it makes sense to implement them to queues.
    And secondly it might lead to an explosion of queues internally. Consider for e.g. if we have say 5000 topics and about 10-15 subscribers for each topic, it will result in up to 75000 queues. I am not sure if that is a big number for queues, but it feel larger than what I designed for because in my mind I am thinking 4000-5000 topics.you are making a lot of conjectures based on entirely abstract concepts. what is a "queue"? what is a "topic"? these are just abstract ideas used by the jms spec. the words "queue" and "topic" define a bunch of behavior, but say nothing about how you need to implement that behavior. is 75000 queues a lot of queues? who knows, depends how i choose to implement a queue. is the data "replicated" to each queue in a topic? who knows, depends how i choose to store data. you can't make any of these statements outside of a specific implementation of the jms spec.

  • Photoshop crashing after Software Update

    HELP!!!
    After I did the software update, everytime I try to save a file i'm working on in photoshop, the program quits, and the file I try to save becomes corrupt and I can't open it.
    G5 Dually   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    Hey rmillsnyc where is there a thread on this topic ? I searched the tiger update threads and didn't find one, easily. You are not being particularly helpful, ie maybe give a link to the topic etc. You see recently Apple changed the layout of the discussion forum pages and made a limit of 15 topics per page which makes the site , generally more difficult to browse, and much less negative from Apples point of view: Much less problems per page !!. This is not a photoshop problem it is a Tiger problem as usual, therefore it should be right here. I browsed 9 pages and didn't find it, so it seems I'll just have to wait until 10.5.2 Great !!*%£@£@!@££

  • UPK:  Can it create a .swf file for embedding into Articulate?

    We are combining a policy and systems training course. The policy part of the course is built in Captivate and the Systems part of the course is built in UPK. I am able to easily embed the Captivate Policy section into Articulate, but am struggling with the UPK Systems section. It appears that I can insert it as a web object, but that requires server access by our learners and it opens in a seperate window that the learners will have to close as IE won't auto close.
    If UPK could output a .swf file, or if there was some way to convert the player.exe or topic.odtpc files to a .swf file, that would be great...any suggestions?

    Hello,
    Many UPK customers are using their existing Flash content in the concept frames for topics, sections, and modules. This is quite easy to do. Since Flash content on its own isn't very easy to deploy, Adobe Flash has the option to create HTML pages that act as a "home" for the SWF files generated. You'll need to use these HTML files when you copy your Flash content into a UPK package. Once you have all of the files and folders created with the Flash content in a package, all you need to do is create a link to the main HTML page. I don't have Flash or Captivate installed, so I cannot provide exact steps, but I hope this helps.
    EDIT: Oops! I just realized that I misread your question. I'm not familiar enough with Captivate or Articulate, but UPK can be treated like a collection of web pages. The UPK web pages require all the folders that come along with the published player as they contain style information in CSS files and more advanced stuff in Javascript files. If you can pull in all of the UPK files and folders, it should be possible to link to specific topics per the steps described in the UPK product documentation, specifically Content Deployment.pdf.
    Best regards,
    Marc
    Edited by: Marc Santosusso on Aug 3, 2010 6:29 AM

  • Speed is the #1 criteria

    Speed is my #1 criteria. Speed of finding answers, getting answers, posting questions, and just general page loading.
    I view these forums almost exclusively from my daytime job. I can't be see as continually web surfing. I need to get an answer to particular questions quickly. So page load speed is important.
    This is why the current forum is so great- just text, hardly any css, no javascripts, no images, no avatars, no advertising, no Flash/flash. I also need a way to see as much as possible of each topic on screen at once. Currently I can see almost all current topics without scrolling my page. I can see if my post is answered, or new posts are there, etc. Having to scroll 3 pages with lots of wasted space time consuming. Having only 1 page worth of topics, but with tons of fancy frames and wasted space and such so I only see, say 15 topics per page, will kill me. I'd rather see 50 or 100 topics listed on one page than need to load multiple pages. Perhaps a pref to show XX items per page if need be.
    I am against avatars, long signatures, javascripts, and wasted vertical space, and Flash.
    I also HATE grey text. All text should be BLACK. Unless it is grey for a real reason, like a legal disclaimer or something.
    I would like to be able to upload screenshots to be able to clarify problems, that is one thing I will accept if it's a tiny bit slower.
    Sorry to sound like a rant but in order to do my job I need these forums to get answers. Having them crash n burn like the last time would be a big problem.
    Thanks,
    Chris

    Wow. Ann, do you realize that you've just described the advantages and a few basic features available all NNTP newsreaders? ;)
    I'm a long time fan of NNTP and have been reading both adobeforums.com and forums.macromedia.com newsgroups for many, many years (migrated from CompuServe). I even used MM's dial-in BBS a few times.
    I abhor the FuseTalk Web forum software used in the former MacroMedia forums. I do think that the Web forum interface in the old Adobe forums is MUCH better, though still not as good as a real newsreader.
    I've only seen a few of your posts in this forum and hope that my first impression of you is wrong. Just thought I would let you know that a MM newsgroup regular agrees 100% with one of your posts.
    Yes, this recent post of yours expresses some of my hopes for the new forum. Though I may be resistant to change, I have no problems adapting when a new system is an approvement over the old - else I would still be using teletypes and snail-mail.
    I would likely leave if it were to perform the same as either of the existing interfaces. But I will not make such a decision until I've had a chance to kick the tires and take a good, long test drive in the fully migrated and implemented version.

  • Creating frame animations

    This question was posted in response to the following article: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/photoshop/cs/using/WSB8C58284-9DEB-44f2-9D8F-7F77594A8CC2a.htm l

    why can't you keep to one topic per page? I've gone to three or four pages trying to find out where the animation panel even is, and now I've lost track of what I'm doing. Adobe sucks at teaching

  • To Host-"Slow script" message on overlong thread

    To Host,
    I've been following this overlong thread "Network Preference Pane gone berserk..."
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1712387&tstart=0
    and getting a "slow script" message two or three times using Safari, and need to keep clicking on the "continue" button before it will load completely. Very slow with Firefox also, but without the message.
    I don't know if it's me or the server in this situation, but would it help, perhaps, to break it up into pages to eliminate this problem? I thought that was what was usually done with such long threads.
    Also- to hosts- as you must have seen, there have been numerous reports concerning this particular problem with Security Updates 2008-006/7. I know this is a user to user forum and that your job is not to reply to technical issues, but I've been told that Apple technical does monitor these forums. Do you have any way of knowing if Apple is going to take some action in the form of an official announcement or a response of some kind?
    Thanks.

    Hi WZZZ!
    In Your Settings, change the Topic Page View: to Flat.
    You can also adjust the Topics per Forum Page: in that view.
    In Threaded, all responses are displayed on the same page.
    ali b

  • Weblogic JMS Cluster

    Hi,
              I have a 6.1 cluster that has a JMS server A and a JMS Server B
              deployed and running on each of the managed nodes. As destination I
              created a topic with the same name for each JMS Server. The connection
              factories I deployed to the cluster only.
              My problem is, when I start the second managed server, I get the
              following error:
              <Error> <Cluster> <Conflict start: You tried to bind an object under
              the name
              com.csg.pb.tit.tms.TMSSignalTopic in the JNDI tree. The object you
              have bound
              from 169.59.5.26 is non clusterable and you have tried to bind more
              than once
              from two or more servers. Such objects can only deployed from one
              server.>
              When I understand correctly, this happens because the JNDI tree gets
              distributed to all nodes of the cluster, so there would be two object
              with the same name. How do I solve this situation? Do I have the
              specify different names for topics in different JMSServer running in a
              cluster? How would the load balancing work?
              Please help. Thanks in advance
              Juerg
              

    Tom,
              Thanks for your help so far, I installed the patch and got things
              working. However I still have some open points where you might be able
              to help.
              Let's assume I don't have these smart forwarders and I have four
              topics per JMSServer deployed to two managed nodes. Connection
              factories deployed to the cluster. When I connect N publishers
              through the cluster, messages from one publisher end up in the
              appropriate topic on nodeA, messages from another publisher end up in
              the appropriate topic on nodeB. Now when I connect a durable
              subscriber via the cluster I only get messages from topics from one of
              the managed nodes, right? (This is exactly what I am seeing in my
              tests) Connecting durable subscribers to each managed node is not
              possible because of JNDI (throws exception like
              InstanceAlreadyExists). How would I connect a subscriber so that it
              subscribes to the right topics on the right node ( one the works with
              the previously described publisher)?
              All this leads me to the conclusion, that without the forwarders, a
              JMS cluster with Weblogic 6.1 is not so powerful, it basically does
              just load balacing.
              Is this correct or am I missing something important here?
              Thanks a lot and have a nice weekend
              Juerg
              Tom Barnes <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
              > Juerg Staub wrote:
              > > Tom,
              > >
              > > Thanks a lot. Bascially I did everything right, just need the patch.
              > >
              > > In the other hand I'd like to know what the benefits of the smart
              > > forwarders would be. When I understand correctly, every message would
              > > be forwarded to the appropriate topic in the different JMS servers.
              > > What would that bring in the case of a failure(one node of a cluster
              > > goes down)? As far as I can see, I still would need to 're-establish'
              > > the connection factory, topic session, topic and publisher in order to
              > > publish messages again?
              > >
              >
              > Yep. I think we are on the same page:
              >
              > The "smart-forwarders" would do what the 7.0 distributed topic
              > forwarders do for you. They would forward messages bound to
              > a particular physical topic to all instances of the topic.
              > This can be implemented via a durable subscription on a
              > member topic by each remote member topic's host.
              > MDBs could be used to service the durable subscription,
              > as they already have the reconnect logic built in.
              > (Durable subscriptions are used if you wish to guard against
              > lost messages). The forwarders
              > need to change a property on the message to indicate
              > that the message is already forwarded, and forward
              > only messages that have'nt been forwarded (to prevent
              > endless loops!).
              >
              >
              > > Thanks
              > >
              > > Juerg
              > >
              > > Tom Barnes <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
              > >
              > >>I suggest you read the "emulating 7.0 distributed destinations"
              > >>section of the JMS performance white-paper available on dev2dev.bea.com.
              > >>You will need to apply the referenced enhancement patch on top of SP3 to
              > >>disable JNDI replication (or update to 6.1SP4).
              > >>
              > >>If you need to create a true distributed topic, you will also need to
              > >>write your own "smart-forwarders" to forward messages
              > >>between the different physical instances of the topic. Or simply
              > >>use WL JMS 7.0 (the upgrade from 6.1 is straight-forward).
              > >>
              > >>Tom
              > >>
              > >>Juerg Staub wrote:
              > >>
              > >>>Hi,
              > >>>
              > >>>I have a 6.1 cluster that has a JMS server A and a JMS Server B
              > >>>deployed and running on each of the managed nodes. As destination I
              > >>>created a topic with the same name for each JMS Server. The connection
              > >>>factories I deployed to the cluster only.
              > >>>
              > >>>My problem is, when I start the second managed server, I get the
              > >>>following error:
              > >>>
              > >>><Error> <Cluster> <Conflict start: You tried to bind an object under
              > >>>the name
              > >>>com.csg.pb.tit.tms.TMSSignalTopic in the JNDI tree. The object you
              > >>>have bound
              > >>>from 169.59.5.26 is non clusterable and you have tried to bind more
              > >>>than once
              > >>>from two or more servers. Such objects can only deployed from one
              > >>>server.>
              > >>>
              > >>>
              > >>>When I understand correctly, this happens because the JNDI tree gets
              > >>>distributed to all nodes of the cluster, so there would be two object
              > >>>with the same name. How do I solve this situation? Do I have the
              > >>>specify different names for topics in different JMSServer running in a
              > >>>cluster? How would the load balancing work?
              > >>>
              > >>>
              > >>>Please help. Thanks in advance
              > >>>
              > >>>Juerg
              > >>
              

  • Ajust columns width

    The new forum has a better handling of how much I can see on one page. At least for the way I use it.
    The number of lines is very well handled.
    Now please, if you could work on the columns, it would be just perfect.
    Example:
    In "My Settings" I've set "Topics per Forum Page" to the maximum (BTW is it possible to set it to more than 50?), so that I can see a lot of new topics within a "group of Forums", where before I was limited to only 5 Recent Posts in "Home".
    Instead of toggling between, say, the iMac G3, the iMac G4 and the iMac G5 forums, I can now open the only "iMac group of Forums", and see quite a lot of Recent Posts from three different "Displays", three different "Using", three different "Expanding", etc.
    Unfortunately, the column says (for example) a "Using your iMac...", so that I don't know if it is "Using your iMac G3", "Using your iMac G4" or "Using your iMac G5".
    --> The "Topic" column shows that it is possible to enlarge it by just enlarging the webpage width. And it can use more characters than before, this too is a very good enhancement.
    So please, could we have the same ajustable columns everywhere?
    Thanks!!
    Axl

    Sorry, my (wordy) example was unclear.
    I have no problem with handling multiple discussions forum windows, and I find the new Discussions handle multiple categories better than before.
    All I was saying is:
    --> Please, could we have the other columns (namely Author and Forum) automatically ajusting width just like the Topic column does?
    So that
    - we can see author's real name (no Doug McLaugh or Francine Schwieddd sorry about that guys I hope the fix comes soon)
    - we can see in which category one's post is (iMac... = iMac G3 = iMac G4 = iMac G5)
    Thanks again Hosts for all the great work!
    Axl

  • Best way to access my mac G4 files when working on a windows pc laptop

    Hi - I'm looking for ideas on the best way to access files stored on my G4 mac, when working on a pc laptop elsewhere in the house.
    I'm not sure if this involves setting up a network, or whether I should be looking at ftp or even bluetooth.
    Just to explain what I'm after: I'm writing a book, primarily on my g4 (running panther) in my study. But I spend a large proportion of my day running after my rampaging toddler. I'd like to make better use of my time by being able to grab my partner's laptop and write while my toddler is occupied for twenty minutes.
    Messing around with a memory stick etc would just take too long as I'd have to remember to update the main file. It would get very messy!
    I hope someone can help!
    Thanks, Tina
    Message was edited by: tinaMac

    Between the networking question(s) to connect the two different platform
    computers, using Sharing and other settings in each, the next question is
    about the software used in the documents you are to be creating in one
    and sending to the other.
    Do you have a similar word processing software for the PC as in the Mac;
    or something compatible in creating and using .RTF documents, etc. Or,
    if you have a Windows version of AppleWorks, that would work. And the
    TextEdit in your OS X can handle rich text format word processing; and
    probably open basic text from a PC fairly easy. (And Word, etc, can.)
    Issues in sharing, are such that you have to be careful when changing the
    settings in your computers, that you don't accidentally share your computer
    contents with other persons and computers in the vicinity. By wire would be
    the most secure, since Ethernet can be used locally to share.
    Internet and wireless may be a possibility, too; or using a local shared external
    drives, if visible to both computers, depending on the network setup.
    Do you have a USB hard disk drive set up on your wireless network, and
    formatted in Fat32 so the Mac and PC can both see and use it? If so, you
    may be able to send documents to there from the PC and use them in the
    Mac. This may work, and depending on how the files were organized, not
    too hard to keep up with the draft copies generated from the PC for use in
    the Mac at a later time, and so on. This way, both computers would not
    need to be on, to send & receive a file...
    {For that matter, using a Google Account could be helpful;
    to just email the writing to yourself, at any computer.}
    Anyway, there are several possibilities, including those in the link to another
    discussion on that topic per the above post.
    Good luck & happy computing!

  • Message AY219

    Hi,
    There is someone that can help me?
    When I create an equipment and I put a value in field location, appear the error AY219 as follow:
    Diagnosis
    While creating or changing an asset using function module
    ASSET_MASTERRECORD_MAINTENANCE, you tried to assign a value to field
    Change asset master record from equipment. However, field Change asset
    master record from equipment is not ready for input.
    System Response
    The asset master record cannot be processed.
    Procedure
    Check the screen layout and your asset view.
    What I can do to understand where is the problem?
    I have checked and on the AS02 the corresponding field Location is editable.
    Thank you
    A.Esposito

    Hi,
    thank you for your answer. I have another question on the synchronization : when I go on the transaction IE02, in the view organization, near the field Asset I have the botton 'change' in which I can set the parameters for synchronization.I don't understand why the field for synchronization data Equi-->system are not editable.
    In customizing I setted the synchronization of the change fiekd from equipment to asset and from asset to equipment.But from equipment to asset doesn't work.
    Can you help me?
    thank you
    A. Esposito
    A.Esposito,
    Please stick to one topic per thread, open a new thread for your new query.
    This thread is now locked.
    -Paul
    Moderator
    Edited by: Paul Meehan on Oct 5, 2009 7:52 PM

Maybe you are looking for