3560G and 2960 switch CPU loading

Hi all,
I'm using PRTG monitoring switchs performance, the core switch 3560G CPU is 75% and outsite switch 2960 CPU is 25%, is it high loading of those switch ?
Thanks

Hi Leo
I have attached PRTG report and Cisco show proc memory command to you, thanks for help.
3560G
Processor Pool Total:   94334556 Used:   14594348 Free:   79740208
      I/O Pool Total:    8380416 Used:    3587708 Free:    4792708
Driver te Pool Total:    1048576 Used:         40 Free:    1048536
2960
Processor Pool Total:   34988900 Used:    8256776 Free:   26732124
      I/O Pool Total:    4186112 Used:    1641672 Free:    2544440
Driver te Pool Total:    1048576 Used:         40 Free:    1048536

Similar Messages

SpamAssassin and too much CPU load

I have been testing my messaging server and SpamAssassin integration. Everything seems fine except too much CPU load coming from spamd (SpamAssassin's daemon). I am testing them on a UltraSparcII-i, 256MB, Solaris 10 box. When I loaded it with 4msg/min containing 50K ascii text each on the receiving side, the spamd process went up to 90% of CPU load, and then just died silently. My questions;
1) Is there any performance tuning that I should do to avoid that much CPU load? Or is this just normal?
2) I have heard of another anti-spam product called dspam. How can I integrate dspam with the Java Messaging Server?
Thanks!

Installation of JES Messaging Server by itself suggests 1.2 gig of RAM. SpamAssassin adds to that suggestion.
You have less than 1/4 of the suggested RAM. You're 'way short.
SpamAssassin will use cpu. I found that nx x86 box was far less expensive to feed, and works extremely well for Messaging and SpamAssassin. 1 gig or ram for my PC costs about $75. Adding ram to your Sparc will cost mor than a PC complete.
4 messages/min isn't much, but. . .
You're likely swapping pretty hard. Check for "I/O wait". I often use "top" for a quick look at such.
When I switched from an "ultra-5" with 384 megs ram, to an AMD 1200+ with 1 gig of ram, my system went from feeling totally buried to feeling mostly un-used. I'm currently able to handle far more than 4 message/minute, with no overload or swapping.

SSH Configuration in Cisco 3700 and 2960 switches

Dear All,
I have couple of Cisco switches i need to allow some particular ip address for accessing switches through SSH
below is the user ip address details , Kindly help me for a configuring SSH in below listed ip address
user ip address
==========
172.188.50.7
172.188.51.7
172.188.7.222
172.188.100.7
172.188.101.7
172.16.2.222
172.16.1.6
Switch ip address
=============
1. 172.16.9.1
2. 172.16.9.2
3. 172.16.9.3
4. 172.16.9.4
Waiting for the reply
Regards
Muhammed

Please refer this doc for configuring ssh .
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security-vpn/secure-shell-ssh/4145-ssh.html
Define these ip address in a access-list and call that access-class into line vty .
Regards
PrajithTR

How do you spread CPU load over more cores?

Hi
I recently bought a macbook pro quadcore i7 because my 2007 macbook couldn't cope with the demands of Logic when using it rewired with Ableton Live, and had lots of CPU overload messages.
I am really disappointed that having spent so much money to overcome this problem, it has only slightly improved the amount of overload messages. I read the article below about how to spread CPU power over the cores, now I have 8. I still can't figure out though how to control which channels are using which core and spreading the CPU load to cores 5-8 which don't seem to be being used. Any ideas?
Can I rewire from ableton to different cores?
In my project, the 2nd core keeps overloading whilst the others are down. Is it to do with aux channels, master channels, buses etc?
Or should I upload my memory to 8GB RAM?
Thanks
Steve
Here's the article:
About core activity
Logic breaks tasks down into threads that can be assigned to a single core for execution. It's not possible to split a single thread across multiple cores, although a single core may run multiple threads at the same time. This is one reason that you may sometimes see uneven load distributions across the available cores on your computer. If one thread is very processor-intensive, the core running that thread may show much more activity than the cores running less demanding tasks. This is the main reason that you may get "Core Audio Overload" warning messages even though some of the cores on your system may not show significant activity.
To monitor Logic as it uses the cores on your system, double-click the CPU meter in the Transport area.
A window displays a meter for each core.
The same concept applies to channel strips as well. Each channel strip—and all plug-ins it contains—is processed by one core. If you are using many processor-intensive plug-ins on a single channel strip, the core running it may show heavier activity. This is especially true if you are working at high sample rates (88.2 kHz or higher).
Redistributing core loads
If you find that a single core has much higher activity, use these strategies to redistribute the load.
In the example below, there is a single Software Instrument channel strip with plug-ins routed directly to Output 1-2. The channel strip for Output 1-2 has a large number of plug-ins.
In this example there is activity on two cores: the left core is handling the Software Instrument while the next core processes the Output 1-2 channel strip. You can use routing capabilities in Logic to distribute the load to more cores without changing the sound, as in the next image.
The resulting signal chain is Inst 1 > Aux 1 > Aux 2 > Out 1-2, as shown in this table:
Channel strip
Input
Output
Inst 1
Bus 1
Aux 1
Bus 1
Bus 2
Aux 2
Bus 2
Out 1-2
Also, the first four plug-ins have moved from Output 1-2 to Aux 1 and the remaining four plug-ins to Aux 2.
After adjusting the volumes to the respective channel strips appropriately, the result sounds identical, but now the load is distributed among four cores instead of two. You can use this concept to redistribute plug-ins from Audio channel strips, Software Instruments, Auxes, and Outputs (as in this example).
In the image above, there is still a very heavy load on a single core, even though it's using the routing described above. Notice the Inst 1 channel strip is selected. When a Software Instrument track is selected in the Arrange window, Logic enters "Live Input Mode". In this mode, Logic turns on every plug-in in the channel strip's signal path so the channel strip can be played live from a MIDI controller. All of this must be handled by a single thread and therefore just one core. It's a good idea to keep a track that uses an Audio channel strip selected in the Arrange window, unless you're actively playing or recording to a Software Instrument.

OS X Snow Leopard introduced Grand Central, where the OS will distribute the load better to more cores, however it takes time for software to adapt to these changes and make a rewrite of the codebase and test it out, Apple's included.

Problem... High CPU load with HDD. Please Help

Hello all,
Im stuck. Ive got a MSI KA790GX which has poor HDD access/transfer, low burst rate and very high CPU load.
As far as i know the Western Digital 640gb WD6401AALS Black should be a fast hard drive. Which according to reviews/HD Tune,
should be:-
Minimum 60mb/sec
Maximum 120mb/sec
Average 95mb/sec
Access 12ms
Burst 110mb/sec
CPU 5%
No matter what I try, i always get poor results...
My MSI KA790GX
Minimum 41mb/sec ~ 54mb/sec
Maximum 104mb/sec ~ 108mb/sec
Average 86mb/sec ~89mb/sec
Access 12ms
Burst 60mb/sec ~ 80mb/sec
CPU 26% ~ 44%!!!!!!!!
I could accept not getting the same high speed results as the review/reference, even if the burst rate sucked.
But one of the cores goes to 50%-60% load during hdd activity. Thats just crazy!!
I have tried...
IDE mode, AHCI, RAID Ready, RAID Single Disk
SATA Port 1, 2, 3, 4 + 5
Different SATA cables
Flashed bios, cleared bios, optimised defaults, failsafe defaults
Windows XP 32bit, Vista 32bit, Vista 64bit. fresh installs
MSI CD Drivers, MSI Web Drivers, AMD/ATI Web Drivers
... and combinations of.
I have also tested the WD640gb Black on another older PC, with Nvidia (55?) chipset and slower (1.9ghz x2) cpu.
Transfer rates were slightly better than my KA790GX but, Burst Rate = 115mb/sec and CPU usage = 13%.
I also tried a Seagate 1.5tb (ST31500341AS) on both PCs,
Nvidia chipset
Minimum 65mb/sec
Maximum 134mb/sec
Average 107mb/sec
Access 14ms
Burst 83mb/sec
CPU 7%
On my MSI KA790GX
Minimum 55mb/sec
Maximum 120mb/sec
Average 100mb/sec
Access 14ms
Burst 87mb/sec
CPU 33%!!!!
Could someone please please help, ive spent hours and hours on this. Its doin my head in.
I just hope its something stupid ive missed, cos i still not used my HD4850 from christmas :-(
Thanks.

Sm3K3R
Not sure how to check PIO/DMA mode on a SATA device. IDE devices show DMA enabled.
BIOS version 1.4 - 29 December 2008, and now version 1.51
Fredrik
I have Vista 64, but i did try XP32 and Vista32 and got similar poor results.
I tested HDD speed with, HD Tune 2.55 and HD Tune 3.50 trial.
No auto-start programs really, Windows clean installs + any drivers.
Quadrifoglio Verde
CPU @ default 2800mhz, All mem bios options to auto/defaults
Windows Experience Index, CPU Score = 5.3
AMD Overdrive
Integer Computation = 8220
Floating Point Computation = 5325
Memory speed = 1770
Cache Speed = 10790
System Performance = 7403
Bas
I used HDTune because I could reference to other results. Whats a better program to use?
Windows Experience Index, HDD Score = 5.9.
But I have no reference and cant be sure of cpu load.
Sepher
Bios defaults to C&C and C1E off so i have tried them. Also windows power settings, balanced/high performance.
UPDATE
Reinstalled Vista64 but loaded the AHCI driver from the disk config screen. This seems to have stopped the high cpu usage during disk activity.
HDTune with Windows Power settings @ High Performance,
Min = 52mb/sec
Max = 106mb/sec
Ave = 88mb/sec
Access = 12ms
Burst = 77mb/sec
CPU = 3.4%
HDTune with Windows Power settings @ Balanced
Min = 54mb/sec
Max = 104mb/sec
Ave = 87mb/sec
Access = 12ms
Burst = 65mb/sec
CPU = 12%
So now transfer speed is about 10% slower than reference. But burst speed is terrible.
I also used IBM Feature Tool to change the HDD AAM to 'performance mode' 254 as suggested elsewhere.
Long shot as the hdd performs ok with other hardware. same results.
Also MSI support asked me to try a newer bios, version 1.51. same results.
Anyone know what the AMD 7-Series Chipsets Disk Performance Utility does, and should i run it in Vista64?
Thanks for all the replies, hope i can sort this, not played any PC games since Quake 3 on my ti4600...

Reduce CPU load in game

Hello everyone,
Having a problem with a game, The cpu load at the start when all the elements are on the stage is between 120 - 150%. Far too high. I reduced the frame rate from 30 to 24 and now the cpu load is around 100 - 125% which is still too high for my liking !! I'm wondering if this code can be optimized, I'm sure this is the cause, it's running within a movieclip class on 15 movies at the start.. can anyone help ?? Thanks in advance :-
       private function onEnterFrameHandler (event:Event) : void {
            this.vy += gravity;
            this.x += vx;
            this.y += vy;
            var left:Number = 0;
            var right:Number = stage.stageWidth;
            var top:Number = 0;
            var bottom:Number = stage.stageHeight;
            if(this.x + this.width > right)
                this.x = right - this.width;
                vx *= bounce;
            else if(this.x - this.width < left)
                this.x = left + this.width;
                vx *= bounce;
            if(this.y + this.height > bottom)
                this.y = bottom - this.height;
                vy *= bounce;
            else if(this.y - this.height < top)
                this.y = top + this.height;
                vy *= bounce;

First, you can drop all those this' - there's no need for them. I never use this in as3 anymore.
Second - get rid of all your local vars. Is stage.stageWidth changing? Probably not... so don't poll the player for it on each frame. Same with the clip extents.
Something more like so:
private var left:int = 0;
private var right:int = stage.stageWidth;
private var top:int = 0;
private var bottom:int = stage.stageHeight;
private var clipWidth:int = width;
private var clipHeight:int = height;
private function onEnterFrameHandler (event:Event) : void
    vy += gravity;
    x += vx;
    y += vy;
    if(x + clipWidth > right)
        x = right - clipWidth;
        vx *= bounce;
    else if(x - clipWidth < left)
        x = left + clipWidth;
        vx *= bounce;
    if(y + clipHeight > bottom)
        y = bottom - clipHeight;
        vy *= bounce;
    else if(y - clipHeight < top)
        y = top + clipHeight;
        vy *= bounce;

BT stack file TosBTMng.Exe causes 100% CPU Load

I'm also facing the problem that the Toshiba Bluetooth Manager (TosBtMng.exe) very often starts looping and causes a CPU load of 100%.
This happened with older versions of the Toshiba Bluetooth Stack and current version (5.1.0.12).
The affected system is a Tecra S1, internal BT-Modul and Windows XP SP2.
Installation of the BT-Stack went well and the notebook will boot succesfull while BT is enabled. I also checked for hidden COM-Ports and other hints found in this forum, no success.
The lockup seems to happen at different times. Sometimes just after are reboot, clicking on the BT Tray symbol with the right mouse button. Then the context menu is shown just as white area, no entries. It may also trying to connect to an already paired device. If I kill the process with the task manager I can restart and it continues to work for some time.
As found in another thread here I have enabled API logging of the Bluetooth Manager and found the following while connecting with the Nokia PC Suite to my mobile Phone:
00042519 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042520 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042521 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2 : InitCOMPort=COM6, CreateCOMPort=COM23
00042522 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall : Send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000036(54)
00042523 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042524 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000028(40)
00042525 21:55:05 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042526 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetLocalInfo()
00042527 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BtGetLocalInfo2 : Input Paramers / pLocalBtDeviceInfo=00D9FE8C, plStatus=00D9FE84
00042528 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall : Send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00001000(4096), Size=00000030(48)
00042529 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042530 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00001000(4096), Size=0000003F(63)
00042531 21:56:14 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042532 21:56:17 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetRemoteDeviceList2()
A new COM port is successfully created (COM23), and a few seconds later the CPU Load of TosBtMng goes up to 100%, but no API calls are performed. And if you wait long enough the phone gets connected and data can be transferred. However, very slowly.
Probably due to the high CPU load a next COM (COM24) port will be created sometime later and this process is then repeated again:
00042740 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042741 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008007(32775), Size=00000041(65)
00042742 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042743 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042744 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042745 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BtCreateCOMM2 : InitCOMPort=COM6, CreateCOMPort=COM24
00042746 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] BlockingSDPCall : Send COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000036(54)
00042747 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Receive WM_COPYDATA / fCloseAPI(BOOL)=0
00042748 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] SetReturnBackData : Received COPYDATASTRUCT / FuncNumber=00008000(32768), Size=00000028(40)
00042749 21:56:47 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BlockingSDPCall() is returned.
00042750 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetCOMMInfoList2()
00042751 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042752 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042753 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042754 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042755 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042756 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042757 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042758 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042759 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM() -> BtCreateCOMM2()
00042760 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtCreateCOMM2()
00042761 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetLocalInfo()
00042762 21:57:52 [7208] [TosBtAPI(PCCSTBTP)] Call BtGetLocalInfo()
Maybe this helps to locate the origin of the CPU load problem of the Bluetooth Manager.
Thanks
Gerhard

I was having the same problem, and it turned out to be the Data execution prevention settings. I had turned on (System->Advanced->Data execution protection) the execution prevention for all programs, causing TosBTMng.exe to max out one processor core all the time. The solution was to add TosBtMng.exe to the list of exceptions and restart. I'd looked high and low for a solution - hope this helps someone else!

High CPU load in audio conference application

Hi Java Guys and Java Girls.
We are developing an audio conferencing application that is based on the AVTransmit and AVReceive examples, from the JMF 'code samples' page: http://java.sun.com/products/java-media/jmf/2.1.1/solutions/AVTransmit.html
The main change that we made to the examples was to spilt the application in to two threads, one which receives and one which transmits, in order to use the duplexing capabilities of our shiny new (and expensive :-) sound cards - M-Audio Delta 44.
Our problem is one of performance. Even when only one of the channels is working, we get a lag of somewhere around 1 second. When both channels are connected and running, the CPU load jumps up to 100%, and the streaming breaks down in both directions. With only one of the 2 channels open the CPU load is only about 1% - below the tolerance of the measurement.
Interestingly enough, we tried running the UI Example as well, using 2 different TCP ports to get duplexing running between the 2 computers, and we encountered the same problem.
We've been bashing away at this problem for weeks now, and we have tried all sorts of things, but now we are rapidly reaching the edge of sanity. We really need to get this to work, with lag times below 0.25 seconds, and without taxing the CPUs too much.
We would be extremely grateful if you could look at the code that we are pasting below, and let us know if you can see what we are doing wrong.
Thanks very much for your help.
Yours,
Adam Crowther
Martin Piwowarski
PS We are using 2 Athlon 2.0+ Systems, each with 512MB of RAM, running Windows XP Pro, and streaming over a 100MBPs Ethernet LAN, using the on-board LAN adapters.
PPS We put the code here:
http://www.adamcc.ch/jmf/

The problem is not your code, but the stock JMF DirectSound audio renderer.
The audio renderer has its DirectAudio buffer hard-coded to hold 2 seconds of sound. Therefore, if you have any lag for any reason from the audio card driver when sound is starting up, you will have an audio delay of up to two seconds.
My company had to make heavy modifications to the original JMF audio renderer. We set up a 300 millisecond buffer and also introduced code to handle buffer starvation, etc., etc. I would suggest you get the JMF source code and check this out for yourself.
Good luck.

High CPU load after resuming from sleep mode

When my laptop resumes from sleep mode, LabVIEW 2012 starts to generate a very high and always constant CPU load (25%) without any VI running. I need to close all front panels to get back to the usual <1% CPU load level.
This behaviour spoils my carbon footprint and frequently eats up my battery. Any ideas what is causing this ?
Thank you,
Dirk

I'm guessing your issue may be related to this:
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Why-is-using-100-of-a-CPU-1-out-of-8-when-it-does-nothing/m-p/242745...
Dirk@LV wrote:
This behaviour spoils my carbon footprint and frequently eats up my battery.
Thank you,
Dirk
Sorry about your carbon footprint, NI has a lot to answer!
Beginner? Try LabVIEW Basics
Sharing bits of code? Try Snippets or LAVA Code Capture Tool
Have you tried Quick Drop?, Visit QD Community.

High CPU utilization on 2960 switch

Hi
I have a 2960 switch connected in my network. It is showing high CPU utilization upto 80-90%. When I checked I found that the below processes are taking the highest utilization. The image in the switch is LAN base. Can someone please advice on why I am having high utilization on the switch for the below processes and how can I reduce it.
14.69% 14.98% 15.00%   0 Hulc LED Process
14.69% 11.49% 13.97%   0 IP Input
29.07% 28.44% 30.06%   0 DHCPD Receive

Duplicate post.
Go HERE.

High CPU load and com.apple.ImageCaptureExtension2 crash after upgrade

After upgrading my Macbook Air from Lion to Mountain Lion, the system has a very high cpu load, and the crash reporter is the process that causes thee high load. In the error log I see this entry several times per second:
17.08.12 12:58:46,011 ReportCrash[5998]: com.apple.message.domain: com.apple.crashreporter.writereport.crash
com.apple.message.signature: Image Capture Extension
com.apple.message.signature2: com.apple.ImageCaptureExtension2 ||| 8.0 (8.0)
com.apple.message.signature3: 03A96CBDA3C85A114383537BFC5C8999
com.apple.message.result: NO
com.apple.message.summarize: YES
I investigated a bit more and recovered, that it has something to do with the printer drivers. When I remove all printers from setting, everything is fine. As soon as I add a printer (Brother MFC 9440CN printer/scanner, printer driver provided by Mountan Lion), the crash reporter starts it's work and the error log is full of those entries.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Marcus

I did more exploration and found the cause of this, but I don't know how to fix it:
I removed all Brother and Lexmark printer drivers and rebooted (and also tested with a virtual machine using 10.8.0 as guest os that never had any printer installed). As soon as I enter the printer settings and press the "+", the crashes begin, so it looked like the bonjour one of the printers announcing themselves via Bonjour were causing this.
When watching a picture in the preview app the same happend. We have two multi function printers in our network, the already mentioned brother printer and a Lexmark X204N. Switching off the Lexmark (which wasn't installed on my Mac) solved the problem. Switching off the printer is no solution in our office (it's our fax device and main printer), but switching off mDNS on the Lexmark also solved it. But this can only be a workaround.
Is this a known problem with Lexmark devices and Mountain Lion (it works fine with machines using Lion)? Are there any fixes known? It's just the Lexmark device announing itself via Bonjour that causes trouble, even if the driver is not installed.

Load balancing on 2 pair outdoor AP1300 and 1 switch C3560 each end

Hi,
i will configure four AP1300 and two C3560G with load balancing can you help me.
this my design:
1. (AP1300#1 on switch A) <-----trunk via AP1300------> (AP1300#2 on switch B)
2. (AP1300#3 on switch A) <-----trunk via AP1300------> (AP1300#4 on switch B)
If uplink no.1 down i have uplink no.2 still up for a second.
Regards,
Edgar

If I understand the question I think that isdn bchan-number-order is the command you are interested in. I think it detaults to round-robin, sounds like you want ascending (that is isdn bchan-number-order ascending). It is an interface subcommand.
See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t2/feature/guide/gt_ibcac.html#wp1055853
That may only apply to native ISDN calls and not MICA based calls, but see if that helps.

Switch-independent load-balancing NIC teaming on server-side and MAC/ARP flapping on L2/L3 switches

Since active deployment of Windows Server 2012, our servers support team began to utilize new feature - switch-independent load-balancing NIC teaming. At first look it seems great - no additional network configuration is required and load balancing is performed by server itself by sending frames in round-robin or some hash algorithm out from different NICs (say two for simplicity) but with same MAC address. Theoretical bandwith is now grown up to 2Gbps (if we have two 1G NICs per server) against failover NIC teaming configuration, when one of two adapters is always down.
But how does this affect (if does) switching and routing performance of network equipment? From point of view of L2 switch - it has to rewrite its CAM table each time a server sends frame from different NIC. Isn't it expensive operation? Won't it affect switching in a bad way? We see in our logs that same server make switches to change mac-to-port associations several times per second.
Well, and how does it affect routing, if the switch to which server is connected is L3 switch an performs routing for the subnet server connected to? Will CEF operate well if ARP entry chages several times per second?
Thank you.

Since nobody answered here, we created service request and got the following answer (in short):
L2 MAC flapping between ports is very bad and you must avoid such configurations as much as possible. There is one possible variant that can be considered in your situation - use port-channel (either L2 or L3), in this configuration port-channel will be treted as single port and there won't be flapping.
Conversation example is here: https://ramazancan.wordpress.com/tag/best-practice/

Error on RT Get CPU Load With CRIO 9024 and LV2010

I just try to monitor CPU Load on my CRIO 9024 using LV2010 and i get Error -2233 with RT Get CPU Load.vi
It worked with LV2009 and not anymore ... Someone has some issues ?
Could we enabled/disabled CPU load on target ? how ?

Hi silencer,
Thank you for posting on National Instruments' forum.
Can you tell me your version of LabVIEW RT, and NI-RIO drivers please?
I verified the problem with LabVIEW 2010 and a cRIO 9022 and it works.
Can you send another screenshot please?
Best Regards,
Romain P.
National Instruments France
#adMrkt{text-align: center;font-size:11px; font-weight: bold;} #adMrkt a {text-decoration: none;} #adMrkt a:hover{font-size: 9px;} #adMrkt a span{display: none;} #adMrkt a:hover span{display: block;}
>> NIDays 2011, le mardi 8 février au CNIT de Paris La Défense

Relation between CPU load and # of users

Dear all :
is their a relation between # of cpus and cpu load
if i have 100 concurent user how many cpu should dedicated to it ?

from where can i get benchmark?From your brain.
If I give you a benchmark, it will be valid with my load, not yours. You need to create a benchmark that reflects your load.
I have no idea what kind of load you have. Nor does anyone else ...
... unless you have a OTS or COTS application (Off The Shelf or Customized Off The Shelf). In which case your vendor (or developer) should have some clue.
(Refraining from comments about the majority of developers ...)

3560G and 2960 switch CPU loading

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for