3850 Switch - QOS

HI
We've just purchased 3850 switch part of a wireless upgrade, but we are usign 8500 wlc.
Want to use the 3580 just as a edge switch without the wlc as we didn't purchase the licences.
Using our exsiting 3750x template haing issues with the QOS settings
mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56
mls qos srr-queue input cos-map queue 2 threshold 1 3
mls qos srr-queue input dscp-map queue 2 threshold 1 24
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 1 threshold 3 5
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 1 2
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 2 threshold 3 3
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 1 1
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 3 threshold 3 0
mls qos srr-queue output cos-map queue 4 threshold 3 6 7
mls qos queue-set output 2 threshold 2 3200 3200 100 3200
mls qos queue-set output 2 buffers 10 70 10 10
mls qos
any help would be apprieicated in pointing to right direction.
Have been looking for last couple of days.
cheers

Hi
this might help (as we moved from 3750 to 3850 switches, we had to rebuild qos).
The basic idea is something like this
Class-maps:
class-map match-any CM_VOIP
match dscp ef
class-map match-any CM_SIGNALING
match ip dscp cs3
match ip dscp af31
class-map match-any VC_VIDEO
match dscp af41
Policy map for the uplink:
policy-map UPLINK-OUT
class CM_VOIP
priority level 1 percent 10 (this is the high priority queue)
police cir percent 10 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
class CM_SIGNALING
priority level 2 percent 5 (low priority queue)
police cir percent 5 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
class VC_VIDEO
bandwidth remaining percent 10
class class-default
bandwidth remaining percent 75
Uplink config:
Interface Gi1/1/1
Service-policy output UPLINK-OUT
This way you can build your qos policies. You can tune anyway you like / configure more traffic types and/or confighure policies for access ports

Similar Messages

  • Cisco 3850 SSID qos

    Hello all)
    I have the task to configure QoS for SSID. I have 1602E points and 4 SSIDs per point. I want to priorities one of them. APs are connected to cisco 3850. Please help me how can I do it?

    Bandwidth and Priority Management at SSID Level
    The next step is to take care of the QoS policy at the SSID level. This step applies to both the Catalyst 3850 switch and to the 5760 controller. This configuration assumes that voice and video traffic is identified through the use of class-map and access-lists and is tagged properly. However, some incoming traffic that is not targeted by the access-list may not display its QoS marking. In that case, you can decide if this traffic should be marked with a default value or left untagged. The same logic goes for traffic already marked but not targeted by the class-maps. Use the default copy statement in a table-map in order to ensure that unmarked traffic is left unmarked and that tagged traffic keeps the tag and it not remarked.
    Refer the link for the Complete Configuration : www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless-mobility/wireless-lan-wlan/116479-configure-qos-00.html#anc15

  • Error in GUI of Cisco 3850 Switch with Wireless Controller.

    Hi,
    I have Configured 3850 switch wireless controller. But while accessing the controller through GUI, I faced following errors while configuring it through GUI.
    Because its complecated to configure it through CLI.
    Attached are the snaps of error faced.
    and if I didnt get this error, and able to configure, I can save it because of this error.
    Please help me on this issue, so that I can easily configure the controller.
    Brgds,
    Ninad Thakare

    Hi Sandeep,
    Here is the configuration which I have did.
    ip http server
    ip http secure-server
    wsma agent exec
    profile httplistener
    profile httpslistener
    wsma agent config
    profile httplistener
    profile httpslistener
    wsma agent filesys
    profile httplistener
    profile httpslistener
    wsma agent notify
    profile httplistener
    profile httpslistener
    wsma profile listener httplistener
    transport http
    wsma profile listener httpslistener
    transport https
    wireless mobility controller
    wireless management interface Vlan4 ( Voice VLAN )
    wlan FG-WiFi 1 FG-WiFi
    client vlan 4
    ip dhcp server 10.106.72.1
    no security wpa akm dot1x
    security wpa akm psk set-key ascii 0 testing1234
    no security wpa wpa2
    no security wpa wpa2 ciphers aes
    no wmm
    no shutdown
    wlan GLOBALACCESSII 2 GLOBALACCESSII
    client vlan 4
    ip dhcp server 10.106.72.1
    no security wpa akm dot1x
    security wpa akm psk set-key ascii 0 testing1234
    no security wpa wpa2
    no security wpa wpa2 ciphers aes
    no wmm
    no shutdown
    ap group default-group
    ap group 3850WLC
    wlan FG-WiFi
      vlan 4
    wlan GLOBALACCESSII
      vlan 4
    end
    Brgds,
    Ninad Thakare

  • Has anyone deployed converged access with 3850 switches and 5760 WLCs?

    Has anyone deployed a converged access network architecture with 3850 switches and 5760 WLCs? I have done lots of projects with the 5508 WLCs In a centralized deployment. Basically with this design, I manage 2 logical networks as the wireless network is an overlay over the wired network. I can design firewall to segregate traffic between the wired and wireless hence I can carry both staff and guest traffic.
    Now Cisco is telling us that there is new design such that the dats plane traffic can be dropped locally through the 3850 switched. I am not sold on this and have not found any recommended best practices on when should we use a converged access architecture.
    Pros
    With converged access, data traffic is terminated at the MA which is on the switches, hence the WLC will not be a bottleneck? This is to prepare adoption for 802.11ac?
    Less hops for voice calls from user A to user B as data control traffic is dropped locally.
    Cons
    Now how do I segregate guest and staff traffic if my security folks say I need a firewall?
    Troubleshooting wireless client mobility will be a nightmare as the 3850 switches are MA.
    Pushing and upgrading code for the Code will mean upgrading the stack of switches in the LAN riser. This will be painful in a huge campus environment like an university.
    Can someone convince me why would a customer choose converged access?
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

    They choose CA because of the capwap termination at the switch. You can still use a 5508 and tunnel guest to a DMZ segment if you wish. You will need a 5508 though is you want to tunnel traffic to an anchor WLC.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • Solarwinds Netflow products what will work with a 3850-switch

    Does anybody know….what Solar winds product will do Net Flow with Cisco 3850-switches? I know Net Flow Configurator will not work….but what about Net Flow Real-time for a Cisco 3850 switch?

    For a lot of people, it is not neccessary. I used to ask myself that question until I came across a need for things that iLife and the Finder would not do.
    Toast is a great program with a lot of features that just are not standard on a Mac.
    You can make music DVDs. You can span a HD backup over multiple disks. You can make hybrid PC/Mac disks. It has DVD compression tools to fit a 8.5GB dual-layer DVD onto a single layer 4.7GB DVD.It suppoprts OGG and FLAC audio formats. You can turn your iMovie and iDVD projects into DivX disks.
    It also has lots of nice tools to clean up audio that is imported from a noisy source - like vinyl.
    It is all in all a very useful program, but not unless you need any of those features of course.

  • Ciscoworks LMS 4.0.1 and 3850 switch support

    HI, I want to know if 3850 switch is supported in ciscoworks LMS 4.0.1, I added the devices, inventory collections successful but devices icon is  blue with question mark "?" and config sync fails always.
    I tried to download the packages to install it but I couldn't find it.
    thanks fo help

    Yes LMS 4.2 needs a new license. You can probably check once if your LMS 4.0.1 license allows you a free upgrade.
    Many old LMS 4.0.1 were offered free Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.x, which has LMS 4.2 available with.
    You can check the contract covering your LMS 4.0 on Product upgrade tool :
    http://tools.cisco.com/gct/Upgrade/jsp/productUpgrade.jsp
    -Thanks
    Vinod
    **Rating Encourages contributors, and its really free. **

  • What is the max number of 3850 switches in a stack

    This doc states 4.  Has there been any change to allow more?
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3850-series-switches/qa_c67-722110.html

    Up to 9 Cisco Catalyst 3850 switches can be stacked together to build single logical StackWise-480 switch since Cisco IOS XE Release 3.3.0SE.
    Prior to Cisco IOS XE Release3.3.0SE, up to 4 Cisco Catalyst 3850 switches could be stacked together.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3850-series-switches/qa_c67-722110.html

  • How can i configure hsrp in cisco 3850 switch please guide me

    how can i configure hsrp in cisco 3850 switch please guide me

    Hi Mauleshg,
    Please the below mention link to configure Hsrp hope this will help you.
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/software/release/3se/ip/configuration_guide/b_fhrp_3se_3850_cg/b_fhrp_3se_3850_cg_chapter_010.html
    Br.
    Mohseen Patel

  • Distributed multicast routing command not working on Catalyst 3850 switch

    Hi Cisco community,
    I was wondering if there is a known problem as to why the ip multicast-routing [distributed] option is not available on the Cat 3850 platforms
    global command " ip multicast-routing " is accepted 
    the configuration guide named:
    IP Multicast Routing Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS XE Release 3SE (Catalyst 3850 Switches)
    First Published: January 29, 2013
    Last Modified: October 22, 2013
    explains that this option "key word" [distributed]  should be available>
    Enables IP multicast routing.
    ip multicast-routing [distributed] 
    Device(config)# ip multicast-routing distributed
    =============== Here is what i have and see =========
    Config attempt
    ============
    CAT-3850-1(config)#ip multicast-routing distributed
                                                ^
    Show command:
    ========
    CAT-3850-1#show ip multicast 
      Multicast Routing: enabled
      Multicast Multipath: disabled
      Multicast Route limit: No limit
      Multicast Fallback group mode: Sparse
      Number of multicast boundaries configured with filter-autorp option: 0
    Software:
    ========
    Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst L3 Switch Software (CAT3K_CAA-UNIVERSALK9-M), 
    Version 03.03.03SE RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
    License rights:
    ============
    CAT-3850-1#sh license right-to-use 
     Slot#  License name   Type     Count   Period left 
     1      ipservices   permanent     N/A   Lifetime
     1      apcount      adder         10     Lifetime
    License Level on Reboot: ipservices
     Slot#  License name   Type     Count   Period left 
     2      ipservices   permanent     N/A   Lifetime
     2      apcount      adder         10     Lifetime
    License Level on Reboot: ipservices
    Any hints and help would be greately appreciated.
    Many thanks in advance
    Markus 

    Hi Reza,
    Thank you for your quick reply, and for putting the record staright. As such, a helpful rating was provided
    PS: Feel free to help me one more time if you happend to know folllow on this query :)>
    I guess that the disributed function has been included in the standard mulitcast routing command because the key word is no longer needed. Or perhaps this platform does not support this at all.#
    Once again , thank you for your help above.
    Best regards

  • 3850 switches and NAC

    Hi all,
    We had 802.1x/MAB running fine at a site with Cisco 3750 switches. We then upgraded to Cisco 3850 switches. Now we find that a number of Avaya IP phones get stuck saying "Discover xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" and when you do a "sh auth session int gi x/y" it shows the "D" flag and it says "Blocked On: Pending Deletion".
    Has anyone come across this before?
    Thank you in advance!

    Ugh, I think you might have hit the same issue that I did with a deployment that I have done in the past, except in my case I was dealing with Cisco 4500-X that also runs the XE code. The "IP Device Tracking" is disabled by default on Catalyst IOS but enabled by default on IOS XE. The command is needed (even for layer 2 switches) if you plan on deploying dot1x with DACLs. 
    I have worked with both Arista and HP (Actually 3com) in the past. Arista had some very nice and fast switches while HP had nothing that really impressed me. To be fair, I have ran into issues/bugs with both manufacturers :) So just keep in mind that nobody will be perfect out there :)
    Btw, I still believe that Cisco's TAC and communities, such as this is what sets Cisco apart from the rest of the competition. 
    Best regards, 
    Neno

  • Emergency Responder and Cisco 3850 Switches

    I'm running Cisco ER V8.5, and recently installed new Cisco 3850 Switches. All the phones connected to the 3850 switches show a "unlocated" status. I've check the hardware compatibility Matrix for ER V8.5 and the 3850 is not on it.
    What are my options for locating these phones in ER and assigning them to an ERL. Manually defining the phones? Is there a patch or update to ER V8.5 that would make a 3850 compatible?

    I haven't used the 3850's with ER yet so can't speak to that specifically, but generally speaking you have more flexibility using location by subnets vs switches.  Scalability-wise, you can add way more subnets than switches.  There's more going on under the hood if you're locating by switches so the process overhead is greater.
    The only downside with using subnets is if you need to get more granular with your locations than your deployed subnets allow (ie a single voice subnet for an entire building but you need to define and assign locations at the floor level).  As long as you've been a little forward thinking on the route/switch side, you'll be fine.
    hope that helps,
    will

  • Cisco 3850 Switch getting message %SPI_FC-3-HIGH_WMARK_REACHED

    Hi Team,
    We have one Cisco 3850 Switch installed at the Customer site and getting the message as below,
    Mar 28 10:57:11.578: %SPI_FC-3-HIGH_WMARK_REACHED: Number of messages in the queue for channel 9 has reached maximum.
    -Traceback= 1#830db5fd318976b0280defe233875463  :10000000+153F71C :10000000+B5E9B0 :10000000+B5EBA4 :10000000+3CC5CC :10000000+3CD0B4 :10000000+39AB00 :10000000+27CDD2C :10000000+7C7814 :10000000+27AC29C
    .Mar 28 10:58:31.585: %SPI_FC-3-HIGH_WMARK_REACHED: Number of messages in the queue for channel 9 has reached maximum.
    -Traceback= 1#830db5fd318976b0280defe233875463  :10000000+153F71C :10000000+B5E9B0 :10000000+B5EBA4 :10000000+3CC5CC :10000000+3CD0B4 :10000000+39AB00 :10000000+27CDD2C :10000000+7C7814 :10000000+27AC29C
     --More--         .Mar 28 10:59:51.586: %SPI_FC-3-HIGH_WMARK_REACHED: Number of messages in the queue for channel 9 has reached maximum.
    -Traceback= 1#830db5fd318976b0280defe233875463  :10000000+153F71C :10000000+B5E9B0 :10000000+B5EBA4 :10000000+3CC5CC :10000000+3CD0B4 :10000000+39AB00 :10000000+27CDD2C :10000000+7C7814 :10000000+27AC29C
    Please suggest the meaning of these messages and suggestion for resolution on the same.
    Attaching show version, show logging for this Switch.
    Regards
    Ashutosh

    Hi Akilhasan,
    The switch is hitting a bug which is currently under investigation. The latter implies there is no official workaround, but my suggestion would be that you consider reloading the switch outside of business hours (considering preventive measures i. e. back the configuration up, save changes, etc.). 
    The most stable version and recommended per Cisco is 03.03.03. There is newer 03.06.00 available, just released past June, so you may consider as well upgrading the IOS, of course under a properly carried out risk assessment, and you can roll back if something unexpected occurs. I would suggest doing so only if you have a solid knowledge of the customer's network and business needs.
    Hope this helps. 
    Kind regards,
    - Ed

  • WEBGUI 3850 SWITCH

    Dears,
    I have cisco 3850 switch with with ios      3.03.01SE .
    How we can enable webgui for 3850s. i referred the below link to do this activity
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/software/release/3se/system_management/configuration_guide/b_sm_3se_3850_cg_chapter_010101.html
    There is inbuilt wireless controller on this switch.
    I am unable to get any of the options as the wireless gui webpage itself is not coming.
    Please help me how we can do this configs
    Regards
    Deva

    HI Deva,
    Onboard web GUI requires Cisco IOS XE Release 3.2.2SE or later.
    Go to CLI and congfigure these:
    If you want unsecured (http://) web access, go to conf t and enter:
    ip http server
    If you want secure (https://) access, go to conf t and enter:
    ip http secure-server
    Regards

  • WCCP on 3850 switches

    Hi,
    two short questions:
    - Is WCCP V2  functional on the new 3850 switches
    - Which release and license is recommended?
    Many thanks in advance for quick response!
    Peter

    Hello Peter,
    From 3.2.0SE and later, it support WCCP version 2,  you can  also use the Cisco feature navigator for specifics. ( http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/CFN/jsp/by-feature-technology.jsp )
    There is no license required.
    Regards,

  • Why doesnt the 3850 switch suport the 2702 AP?

    Hi
    I just found out the hard way the 3850 switch doesn't support the 2702AP. Does anyone know why cisco's latest switch doesn't support an up to date AP?
    Anyone from cisco care to answer when it might if at all?
    Regards

    Hi,
    Ryan is right, IOS-XE 3.6 added following AP support
    Support is added to the following APs in this release:
    AP2700I, AP2700E
    AP1532I, AP1532E
    Note The Cisco Aironet 1530 Series APs are supported operating only in Local mode; these APs in mesh mode are not supported.
    AP702W, AP702I
    If you are running this version of software & still cannot register your AP, then attache the AP console output to see what's the reason for failure.
    HTH
    Rasika
    ****Pls rate all useful responses ****

Maybe you are looking for