5540 and sub interfaces

One of my client has a 5540 security appliance where I have configured DMZ and other few things . Currently it has 4 workable interfaces excluding management interface . 3 of them are used for data connectivity because 1 port is for failover .
Now with 3 physical interface we have 4 zones using sub interfaces ( vlans ) . Recently there has been a change in network where they have introduced few other types of servers and now there is a request to make more zones
Avaliable Data interfaces are 3
Required Zones are 7
Now this is possible using sub interfaces ( vlan ) but I want to know if this is a recommended solution to use subinterfaces at such large scale and dividing every possible interface . It is a company of 1000 users , other option could be to put an 4GE-SSM card but please let me know if the subinterfaces solution is recommended one for enterprizes ?

Hello,
Sub-interfaces will work fine for you, but just keep in mind that it is still a shared physical medium. Therefore, the sum of the aggregate traffic in all of the VLANs cannot exceed the capacity of the single physical interface. I would suggest ramping up the traffic slowly and monitoring for any performance issues, but otherwise you should be fine.
-Mike

Similar Messages

Shaping on physical and sub interface

Hello,
I currently have a few sub interfaces on my router for various reasons. I have a service policy applied to those sub interfaces and the service policy has the shaping command in it, and its all working fine. My physcial interface G0/0 is where I have an EIGRP neighbor and all of the routes are populated.
The problem is I want to apply a service policy to the physical interface and I am not able do so.
I get this:
router(config-if)#service-policy output g0-shape-out
user-defined classes with queueing features are not allowed in a service-policy at sub-interface/pvc
in conjunction with user-defined classes with queueing features in a service-policy at sub-interface/pvc
This is becuase the shaping command is already used in the service policy on the existing sub interfaces.
What I am wondering is, would it be best practice for me to not use the physical interface eg G0/0 when I have sub interfaces? For example my existing subinterfaces are g0/0.802, g0/0.803 ,g0/0.804. Should I setup a new sub interfaced call g0/0.100 and move the config from G0/0 to this new sub interface and use that as my main eigrp neighbor interface so that I can apply shaping to that sub interface? Or is there a better way to apply multiple services policies that include shaping?
Thanks,
Dan.

I can't put it as input because :
gw-a(config-subif)#service-policy input policy_upload
Traffic Shaping feature not supported in input policy.
Here's a show during a bandwidth test. You can see the offered rate is properly measured and is _way_ above the target shape rate.
gw-a#show policy-map interface Port-channel 1.2
Port-channel1.2
Service-policy output: policy_upload
    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
      624006 packets, 842239036 bytes
      5 minute offered rate 12774000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
      Match: any
      Queueing
      queue limit 64 packets
      (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
      (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0
      shape (average) cir 100000, bc 400, be 400
      target shape rate 100000

Main Interface and Sub Interface

Hello,
I'm fairly new to ASA firewalls so some help is appreciated. Can anyone explain the point of the below config. I thought that normally when using Vlan's there would be no point on configuring a nameif & security level on the main interface? In this case what would configuring an ACL based NAT exemption on the Trunk interface do to traffic on the sub interfaces?
interface GigabitEthernet1/0
nameif Trunk
security-level 100
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet1/0.100
vlan 100
nameif VLAN100
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.100.2
interface GigabitEthernet1/0.101
vlan 101
nameif VLAN101
security-level 90
ip address 192.168.101.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.101.2
interface GigabitEthernet1/0.102
vlan 102
nameif VLAN102
security-level 80
ip address 192.168.102.1 255.255.255.0 standby 192.168.102.2
Thanks Steve

You're right about the main interface.
If you use subinterfaces, you typically do not also want the physical interface to pass traffic, because the physical interface passes untagged packets. Because the physical interface must be enabled for the subinterface to pass traffic, ensure that the physical interface does not pass traffic by leaving out the nameif command. If you want to let the physical interface pass untagged packets, you can configure the nameif command as usual.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa72/configuration/guide/intrface.html#wp1044006
Hope that helps

Etherchannel Simultaneous Primary and Sub-Interface Config

Hello Cisco Experts:
Question: Can I run layer 2 traffic across EtherChannel and layer 3 traffic simultaneously across the same etherchannel on a subinterface? If not, and considering the background information below, is there an advisable alternative? The documentation I've been reading isn't clear on the subject.
Background
I'd like to split my VLans across (2x) L3 3560 switches interconnected by EtherChannel. I'll use SVI's for the routing - but if Switch #1 SVI must route to another SVI on Switch #2, I'd like this traffic to cross the EtherChannel instead of heading to another L3 Device before continuing its route to the destination switch. (I.E. I prefer direct switch to switch routing.)
Design Preference:
I don't want my etherchannel to become a 100% routed channel.
I don't want to add another connection between the switches - ports are at a premium and budget is tapped.
No access level switches are being used at this time.
Physical Topology
Thank you for your time,
Mike

Hi Jon:
First, I didn't begin to think you were criticizing my design. I just wanted to relieve your confusion.
I tested your ideas this morning, and everything checked out and worked fine. After some more investigation, I remembered why I was asking the question about using EtherChannel with an encapsulated Subinterface & IP Addr. for switch-to-switch routing.
Regrettably it had nothing to do with Intervlan routing, which was working fine. But it does have something to do with routing between the two switches.
Link Failure and High Availability
When I began to consider each case of link failure, I discovered 4 cases of link failure that created problematic results. Two of the cases led to an extra hop, and two of the cases result in a black hole. These ideas were tested with packet tracer to verify I had a problem.
These instances occur because I'm routing 3 vlans out of each switch. Each problem could be resolved by a complete HSRP fail-over to the other switch. But maybe the more elegant decision is a switch-to-switch route with an appropriate administrative distance (preferably using the EtherChannel)?
Note: Primary is the primary WAN connection and Backup is the backup WAN connection.
Scenario 1: Extra Hop
Scenario 2: Extra Hop
Scenario 3: Black Hole
Scenario 4: Black Hole
Let me know what you think the ideal solution is: 1) use HSRP tracking to failover to the other switch, 2) create a direct switch to switch route using EtherChannel Subinterface with IP, or 3) some third option.
Thank you for your time,
Mike

The difference between IEEE802.1Q Native VLAN sub-interface and Physical interface?

Hello
I think the following topologies are supported for Cisco Routers
And the Physical interface also can be using as Native VLAN interface right?
Topology 1.
R1 Gi0.1 ------ IEEE802.1Q Tunneling L2SW ------ Gi0 R2
R1 - configuration
interface GigabitEthernet0.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
Topology 2.
R1 Gi0 ------ IEEE802.1Q Tunneling L2SW ------ Gi0 R2
interface GigabitEthernet0
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
And is it ok to use the physical interface and sub-interface with dynamic routing such as EIGRP or OSPF etc?
R1 Gi 0 ---- Point to Multipoint EIGRP or OSPF ---- Gi0 R2 / R3
Gi 0.20--- Point to Point EIGRP or OSPF --- Gi0.10 R4 (same VLAN-ID)
R1 - configuration
interface GigabitEthernet0
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
interface GigabitEthernet8.20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 20.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
Any information is very appreciated. but if there is any CCO document please let me know.
Thank you very much and regards,
Masanobu Hiyoshi

Hello,
The diagram is helpful.
If I am getting you correctly, you have three routers interconnected by a switch, and you want them to operate in a hub-and-spoke fashion even though the switch is capable of allowing direct communication between any of these routers.
Your first scenario is concerned with all three routers being in the same VLAN, and by using neighbor commands, you force these routers to establish targeted EIGRP adjacencies R1-R2 and R1-R3, with R1 being the hub.
Your second scenario is concerned with creating one VLAN per spoke, having subinterfaces for each spoke VLAN created on R1 as the router, and putting each spoke just in its own VLAN.
Your scenarios are not really concerned with the concept of native VLAN or the way it is configured, to be honest. Whether you use a native VLAN in either of your scenarios, or whether you configure the native VLAN on a subinterface or on the physical interface makes no difference. There is simply no difference to using or not using a native VLAN in any of your scenarios, and there is no difference to the native VLAN configuration being placed on a physical interface or a subinterface. It's as plain as that. Both your scenarios will work.
My personal opinion, though, is that forcing routers on a broadcast multi-access segment such as Ethernet to operate in a hub-and-spoke fashion is somewhat artificial. Why would you want to do this? Both scenarios have drawbacks: in the first scenario, you need to add a neighbor statement for each spoke to the hub, limiting the scalability. In the second scenario, you waste VLANs and IP subnets if there are many spokes. The primary question is, though: why would you want an Ethernet segment to operate as a hub-and-spoke network? Sure, these things are done but they are motivated by specific needs so I would like to know if you have any.
Even if you needed your network to operate in a hub-and-spoke mode, there are more efficient means of achieving that: Cisco switches support so-called protected ports that are prevented from talking to each other. By configuring the switch ports to spokes as protected, you will prevent the spokes from seeing each other. You would not need, then, to configure static neighbors in EIGRP, or to waste VLANs for individual spokes. What you would need to do would be deactivating the split horizon on R1's interface, and using the ip next-hop-self eigrp command on R1 to tweak the next hop information to point to R1 so that the spokes do not attempt to route packets to each other directly but rather route them over R1.
I do not believe I have seen any special CCO documents regarding the use of physical interfaces or subinterfaces for native VLAN or for your scenarios.
Best regards,
Peter

Disable BFD in multiple Router Sub interfaces that participates in OSPF

Hi team,
Please help me on this. Here is the scenario:
We are on an enterprise set up and running on 100+ routers.
We have 200 to 300+ sub interfaces for virtual circuits
Our protocol is OSPF over MPLS
One of our provider in LA encountered link flaps on SONET causing our LA router that is directly connected to that link to recalculate multiple times.
Recalculation of OSPF routes caused disconnection of users in LA VM's.
We were advised by our provider in LA to disable BFD so minor link flaps will no affect recalculation of routes.
We are now tasked by our design team to Disable BFD in multiple Router Sub interfaces that participates in OSPF.
My questions are:
What is the implication in disabling all BFD in routers' interface and sub interface?
Will this improve recalculation of OSPF routes in cause of link flaps or it will totally ignore the link flaps?
Will the routers only recognize a "full down" status of the interface?
How can we Disable BFD in multiple Router Sub interfaces that participates in OSPF in a faster way? Or do we have to do this one by one?
Please advise before we present this to the CAB and implementation. Thank you.

My questions are:
What is the implication in disabling all BFD in routers' interface and sub interface?
Answer: the implication would be eliminating sub-second millisecond convergence.
BFD detect failure at the link layer very fast , once detected it informs the upper layer protocol about the failure causing it to converge immediately.
Will this improve recalculation of OSPF routes in cause of link flaps or it will totally ignore the link flaps?
Answer: if your Provider experiencing intermittent flaps, then yes it will be advisable to turn BFD off. this however doesn't totally ignore the link flaps, once the upper protocol detect the failure based on the dead interval parameter on OSPF, it will recalculate OSPF routes again. Keep in mind, if you have redundant or more links to your provider , then I wouldn't recommend disabling BFD , as it should improve Convergence and you shouldn't notice the failure.
Will the routers only recognize a "full down" status of the interface?
Answer: disabling BFD allows the router recognize a full down status once the upper protocol dead interval occurs or full down status of interface. which ever occurs the earliest.
How can we Disable BFD in multiple Router Sub interfaces that participates in OSPF in a faster way? Or do we have to do this one by one?
You can disable it one by one. or if you have configuration management software, it allows you to do it for all nodes at a time. but this depends if you have it or not.
Please consider not to disable BFD if you have multiple OSPF links towards your provider from any branch, as it shouldn't impact your VMs, it should rather improve Convergence at milliseconds which is absolutely not noticeable.
BR,
Mohamed

Could I configure local switching between sub-interface and global interface on ASR9k?

Could I configure local switching between sub-interface and global interface on ASR9k?

For 2 interfaces it is probably best to use an xconnect. It is faster and saves system resources (eg mac learning doesnt apply to xconnect).
Config example:
l2vpn
xconnect group link
p2p link
interface Bundle-Ether100.4321
interface Bundle-Ether500.4321
EFP config:
interface Bundle-Ether100.4321 l2transport
encapsulation dot1q 4000
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
interface Bundle-Ether500.4321 l2transport
encapsulation dot1q 2000
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
This example shows that you can link 2 EFP's with different vlan's together if you'd pop the tags.
If the EFP's are of the same vlan, then popping the tag can be done but not a must. In general it is recommended to always pop vlan tags so there is a standard EFP design, but not for any technical reasons.
When you use a bridge domain and using a BVI, you MUST pop the tags as the BVI has no notion of a vlan tag and wants to see "plain ethernet".
regards
xander

Vrf lite and PBR on the same sub interface

Hi,
I have a connection point to point on subinterface between PE and CE and use EBGP as routing protocol. The CE are router Cisco7609 and on the subinterface i apply "ip vrf forwarding WAP". Inside this vpn / vrf that I defined before I want to do pbr, so to route the traffic based on the source Ip address. I cannot use the "vrf select" because it is not supported on this platform. So I would like to know if I can do pbr on this subinterface and how can I do it, just only configuring the "ip policy route-map WAP" under the same sub interface where I confgure ip vrf forwarding?
Thanks
Ira

Use the route map as a noraml thing.
To match the all the ip address there should not be any match statement in the route map.

IPSec tunnel on sub-interface on ASA 5510

Hello All,
I working on a security solution using ASA firewall and need some technical advice on ASA. Is it possible to setup a IPSec tunnels on each subinterface of a physical interface on ASA 5510?
I would be greatul if someone please reply post this with some details.
Regards,
Muds

Hi Jennifer,
Thanks very much for your reply. I understand where you coming from, but the reason of using sub-interfaces is that, we have only one physical interface on the firewall connected to the MPLS cloud, and we need to setup a seperate IPSec tunnels for each client for security and integrity. In the current scenario, I have static peers and we can easily setup a static route to peer address.
Many thanks for your assistance, please feel free to to advise if you have any other suggestion.
Regards,
Muds

Asa 5505 sub interface plus ports

I have never used 5505 I gave used higher firewalls and all of them can do sub interfaces normally we make sub interfaces and vlans are assigned to them I m trying to config 5505 can someone tell me how I can create sub interfaces ? As I saw few config and it seems that you config vlans like switch ??? Secondly all interfaces have to b part of vlan ? Ie outside which is g0/0 ....can I config it as normall routed port ?

The 5505 is configured nearly the same a a L3-switch. You configure the Vlan-interfaces and assign these to your switch-ports. The switch ports can be configured as access- or as trunk-ports (if you have a SecPlus license).
You find more on this topic on the Config-Guide:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/interface_start_5505.html

NAT on sub-interface with no internet access

Good morning,
Please I have a router 2901, which I configured tow sub-interfaces for Voice and Data. Everything seems to be working fine but I can't access the internet after configuring NAT.
Config below
Router1#sh config
Using 5392 out of 262136 bytes
! No configuration change since last restart
! NVRAM config last updated at 16:15:07 UTC Wed Jul 2 2014 by aadmin
! NVRAM config last updated at 16:15:07 UTC Wed Jul 2 2014 by aadmin
version 15.2
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
hostname A
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
! card type command needed for slot/vwic-slot 0/0
logging buffered 51200 warnings
enable secret 4 U3/EVMmZsx9ys3vbB8aDhHy.5h4qh2V8/DkTGNsxvTA
enable password 7 06150E2C5F5B071E
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa session-id common
memory-size iomem 25
ip cef
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.36.1 10.10.36.25
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.36.200 10.10.36.254
ip dhcp pool DATA
network 10.10.36.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.10.36.1
dns-server 8.8.8.8 4.2.2.2
ip dhcp pool VOICE
network 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.1.1.1
option 150 ip 10.10.36.4
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-3112445314
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-3112445314
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-3112445314
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-3112445314
certificate self-signed 01 nvram:IOS-Self-Sig#1.cer
voice-card 0
license udi pid CISCO2901/K9 sn FCZ1808C4L8
hw-module pvdm 0/0
username a password 7 1416111F05557C
username e privilege 15 password 7 1437455E0E2A25382525260B67
username c password 7 030B580E0701284F165B5C
username a password 7 01000709481E0808
redundancy
interface Embedded-Service-Engine0/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description $ETH-LAN$$ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-GE 0/0$
ip address #.#.#.58 255.255.255.248
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
no keepalive
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
no keepalive
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
ip address 10.10.36.1 255.255.255.0
ip verify unicast reverse-path
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.100
encapsulation dot1Q 100
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
ip http access-class 23
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000
ip nat inside source list LAN_NAT_POLICY interface GigabitEthernet0/1.1 ov
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 #.#.#.57
ip access-list extended LAN_NAT_POLICY
permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
access-list 23 permit 10.10.36.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 23 permit 10.10.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 23 permit 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 101 permit tcp 10.10.36.0 0.0.0.255 host 10.10.36.1 eq telnet
control-plane
mgcp profile default
gatekeeper
shutdown
banner exec ^C
% Password expiration warning.
Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device
and it provides the default username "cisco" for one-time use. If you hav
already used the username "cisco" to login to the router and your IOS imag
supports the "one-time" user option, then this username has already expire
You will not be able to login to the router with this username after you e
this session.
It is strongly suggested that you create a new username with a privilege l
of 15 using the following command.
username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword>
Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want
use.
^C
banner login ^C
Cisco Configuration Professional (Cisco CP) is installed on this device.
This feature requires the one-time use of the username "cisco" with the
password "cisco". These default credentials have a privilege level of 15.
YOU MUST USE CISCO CP or the CISCO IOS CLI TO CHANGE THESE PUBLICLY-KNOWN
CREDENTIALS
Here are the Cisco IOS commands.
username <myuser> privilege 15 secret 0 <mypassword>
no username cisco
Replace <myuser> and <mypassword> with the username and password you want
to use.
IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE PUBLICLY-KNOWN CREDENTIALS, YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE
TO LOG INTO THE DEVICE AGAIN AFTER YOU HAVE LOGGED OFF.
For more information about Cisco CP please follow the instructions in the
QUICK START GUIDE for your router or go to http://www.cisco.com/go/ciscocp
^C
line con 0
password 7 13041406025D52
line aux 0
exec-timeout 0 1
no exec
line 2
no activation-character
no exec
transport preferred none
transport output pad telnet rlogin lapb-ta mop udptn v120 ssh
stopbits 1
line vty 0 4
access-class 23 in
privilege level 15
password 7 094D4D1D105441
transport input telnet ssh
line vty 5 15
access-class 23 in
privilege level 15
transport input telnet ssh
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
ntp master
ntp server 10.10.36.1
end
Please I need a quick response
Thank you.

Can you change the interface to outside interface in this command
ip nat inside source list LAN_NAT_POLICY interface GigabitEthernet0/1.1 ov
can you try this below command
ip nat inside source list LAN_NAT_POLICY interface GigabitEthernet0/0 ov
Regards
PrajithTR

How to make ASR9000 bridge domain forward traffic between sub interfaces of same physical interface?

Hi,
I regularly use bridge domains to connect sub interfaces on different vlans using this sort of configuration:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/5.21 l2transport
description CUSTOMER A WAN
encapsulation dot1q 21
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/10.3122 l2transport
description CUSTOMER A CORE
encapsulation dot1q 3122
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
l2vpn
bridge group WANLINKS
bridge-domain CUSTOMERA
   interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/5.21
   interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/10.3122
When I try to use the same method to bridge two sub interfaces on the same physical interface so as to create a L2 VPN no data flows:
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/5.21 l2transport
description CUSTOMER A WAN
encapsulation dot1q 21
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/5.22 l2transport
description CUSTOMER A WAN2
encapsulation dot1q 22
rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
l2vpn
bridge group WANLINKS
bridge-domain CUSTOMERA
   interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/5.21
   interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/5.22
If I add a BVI interface to the bridge domain then the CE devices at the remote end of the WAN interface can both ping the BVI IP but they remain unable to ping each other.
Is this because tag rewrites are not happening since packets don't leave the physical interface?
How can I work around this and establish a L2 connection between the two subinterfaces?
Thank you

a vlan is usually the equivalent of an l3 subnet, so linking 2 vlans together in the same bridge domain, likely needs to come with some sort of routing (eg a BVI interface).
If these 2 vlans are still in the same subnet, then there is still arp going on, from one host to the other that traverses the bD.
you will need to verify the state of the AC, the forwarding in the BD and see if something gets dropped somewhere and follow the generic packet troubleshooting guides (see support forums for that also).
that might give a hint to what the precise issue in your forwarding is.
regards
xander

Load balancing on sub-interfaces (3 links)

Hello.
I am trying to load balance between the three links of a bundle. Traffic comes and goes with the same bundle interface.
Launched 5 threads TCP\UDP with different SRC DST IP addresses and see the following balances:
IOS-XR               Monitor Time: 00:00:30          SysUptime: 106:39:28
                          Last Clear:   00:00:22
Protocol:General
Interface             In(pps)      Out(pps)      InPkts/Delta   OutPkts/Delta
Te0/1/0/0             11381           628        102062/25512       256/64
Te0/1/0/1             33849         55965        303244/75700    505364/126230
Te0/1/0/2             11363             0        100800/25200         0/0
Quit='q',     Clear='c',    Freeze='f', Thaw='t',
Next set='n', Prev set='p', Bytes='y', Packets='k'
(General='g', IPv4 Uni='4u', IPv4 Multi='4m', IPv6 Uni='6u', IPv6 Multi='6m')
We have 10G switch connected to asr9010 three ports and the following configuration:
interface TenGigE0/1/0/0
bundle id 1 mode active
bundle port-priority 2
interface TenGigE0/1/0/1
bundle id 1 mode active
bundle port-priority 2
interface TenGigE0/1/0/2
bundle id 1 mode active
interface Bundle-Ether1.75
ipv4 address 25.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
encapsulation dot1q 75
interface Bundle-Ether1.76
ipv4 address 26.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
encapsulation dot1q 76
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0: ios # sh bundle load-balancing bundle-e1 detail location 0/1/CPU0
Tue Jun 4 07:03:07.605 UTC
Bundle-Ether1
Type: Ether (L3)
Members <current/max>: 3/3
Total Weighting: 3
Load balance: Default
Locality threshold: 65
Avoid rebalancing? False
Sub-interfaces: 3
Member Information:
    Port: LON ULID BW
    Te0/1/0/0 0 0 1
    Te0/1/0/1 1 1 1
    Te0/1/0/2 2 2 1
Sub-interface Information:
    Sub-interface Type Load Balance Locality
                                        Hash Threshold
    Bundle-Ether1.76 L3 Default 65
    Bundle-Ether1.75 L3 Default 65
    Bundle-Ether1.100 L3 Default 65
Platform Information:
=====================
                  * Bundle Summary Information *
Interface: Bundle-Ether1 Ifhandle: 0x08000160
Lag ID: 1 Virtual Port: 255
Number of Members: 3 Local to LC: Yes
Hash Modulo Index: 3
Member Information:
LON Interface ifhandle SFP port slot remote / rack_id
Te0/1/0/0 0x02000140 0 12 0 1 0/0
Te0/1/0/1 0x02000180 1 13 0 1 0/0
Te0/1/0/2 0x020001c0 11 2 0 1 0/0
                   * Bundle Table Information *
[NP 0]:
   Unicast (Global) LAG table
idx local LON VQI port
   1 0 0 12 0
   2 0 1 13 0
   3 0 2 11 0
[NP 1]
   Unicast (Global) LAG table
idx local LON VQI port
   1 0 0 12 0
   2 0 1 13 0
   3 0 2 11 0
[NP 2]:
   Unicast (Global) LAG table
idx local LON VQI port
   1 0 0 12 0
   2 0 1 13 0
   3 0 2 11 0
[NP 3]
   Unicast (Global) LAG table | Multicast (Local) LAG table
idx local LON VQI port | idx local LON VQI port
   1 0 0 12 0 1 1 2 11 0
   2 0 1 13 0 2 0 0 0 0
   3 1 2 11 0 3 0 0 0 0
[NP 4]:
   Unicast (Global) LAG table | Multicast (Local) LAG table
idx local LON VQI port | idx local LON VQI port
   1 1 0 12 0 1 1 0 12 0
   2 0 1 13 0 2 0 0 0 0
   3 0 2 11 0 3 0 0 0 0
[NP 5]
   Unicast (Global) LAG table | Multicast (Local) LAG table
idx local LON VQI port | idx local LON VQI port
   1 0 0 12 0 1 1 1 13 0
   2 1 1 13 0 2 0 0 0 0
   3 0 2 11 0 3 0 0 0 0
[NP 6]
   Unicast (Global) LAG table
idx local LON VQI port
   1 0 0 12 0
   2 0 1 13 0
   3 0 2 11 0
[NP 7]
   Unicast (Global) LAG table
idx local LON VQI port
   1 0 0 12 0
   2 0 1 13 0
   3 0 2 11 0
================================================== =============================

20 flows and a bit better result:
IOS-XR               Monitor Time: 00:00:08          SysUptime: 133:33:44
                     Last Clear:   00:00:06
Protocol:General
Interface             In(pps)      Out(pps)      InPkts/Delta   OutPkts/Delta
Te0/1/0/0             11794         14977             0/44696         0/44484
Te0/1/0/1             10682          8786             0/37924         0/25456
Te0/1/0/2             18243         16958             0/44596         0/57579
Quit='q',     Clear='c',    Freeze='f', Thaw='t',
Next set='n', Prev set='p', Bytes='y', Packets='k'
(General='g', IPv4 Uni='4u', IPv4 Multi='4m', IPv6 Uni='6u', IPv6 Multi='6m')
Can the ASR9K more or less normal balance on uneven number of links?

LMS 4.2 sub-interface not available in the instance selection window creating poller

Hi All,
I have sub-interfaces created on the switch and are in active(up/up) state,but these sub-interface not available for selection in the instance window while creating the poller, and am not able to monitor the traffic on these sub interface in the performance management.
LMS will not display the interfaces in the instance selection window if they are not active,but here the sub-interface are in active state but these are
not available. can anyboody help me out ??
Thanks,
Channa

Any Idea..??

Issue in Sub-interface traffic on cisco 7609-s router

Hello please support,
I configured sub-interfaces and it is working properly, but some time sub-interface show traffic more then physical interface .
Like
int gi 3/32 0.13 Mbps 12:00 PM
int gi 3/32.11 855 Mbps 12:00 PM
as per my knowledge physical interface have cumulative traffic of all sub-interfaces.
interface GigabitEthernet3/32
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet3/32.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 172.20.128.77 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
ip ospf bfd
bfd interval 50 min_rx 50 multiplier 5
no bfd echo
no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet3/32.11
description interlink MPLS
encapsulation dot1Q 11
ip address 172.20.129.73 255.255.255.252
ip ospf network point-to-point
mpls ip
mpls label protocol ldp
Regards,
Damodar Nagar

I have not that graph so I am just guessing that you are noticing the difference between policing and shaping. It seems to me you are applying these techniques on each platform on a different way. Try to shape/police in the same order or only to shape.
Hope to help
Alessio
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

5540 and sub interfaces

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for