9.0.4 compatibility with jdk 1.5

Hi,
Please do let me know if Oracle AS version 9.0.4.1 is compatible with jdk 1.5.
What is the jdk version compatible with 9.0.4.1?
Found the following in the Metalink -> Certify
In general, Oracle Application Server 10g (9.0.4, 10.1.2.x and 10.1.3.x) support using JDK
extensions higher than one the product originally shipped with. On 9.0.4, it is possible to move from JDK 1.3.1_06 to extension JDK 1.3.1_07 or beyond.
Does this imply that 9.0.4 is certified with JDK 1.5?????
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sindhiya V.

desuported? Can you post a source for this?
9.0.4 is not certified with JDK 1.5 and will not be. AS 10.1.3 is the first release that is (as far as I know).

Similar Messages

Business objects xi 3.1 sp3 on solaris , is it compatable with jdk 1.6

i installed business objects xi 3.1 sp3 on soalris and we are using apache tomcat web application server. wheni read Supported Platform document it says business objects comes with jdk 1.5 . do we have an option such that we can point to jdk 1.6. we are having jdk 1.6 in the /usr/jdk.1.6.023. can we point our whole business objects to that jdk 1.6.
help appreciated
thanks

Hi,
i know that you can re- point the Tomcat WAS to a different JDK but i am not aware that you can point BOE to a different one.
I would recommend you open a OSS Message with the SAP support to check if it is possible and supported.
Regards
-Seb.

How to find jars compatibility with JDK 6

Hi All,
Could you please let me if there is any way to find out if a given jar version will be compatible with the JDK version 1.6 (i.e. java 6)?
Lets say I have Junit version 3.8.1 currently and it is working fine with current JDK version 1.4.2_11. I want to upgrade JDK version to 1.6 (java 6), then how to find out current JUnit version will be compatible with JDK 6? If not how to find out which version of Junit will be compatible with JDK6?
Please let me know if you need more info.
Regards,
psg

spring_1_2_5.jarI assume you are using spring framework 1.2.5.
In this case, you should look at this framework documentation/change log to see what the requirements are.
I think you could download spring framework 1.2.5 bundle (with dependencies). You can then look at the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF of every of jar
(especially third party libraries) in order to know its version.
Every framework release must have been tested and compatibilities resolved, so the job of finding what jar goes with this release is already done.
Example (spring 1.2.x):
fixed JdkVersion to properly detect JDK 1.6/1.7 (Java 6/7) as higher than 1.5 (Java 5)See [change log|http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/1.2.x/changelog.txt] here
Hope it helps

Is SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio Version: 7.0.12 Compatable with JDK 1.5

Hi
I want to user Java SDK version 1.5 instead of 1.4.
Is SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio Version: 7.0.12 compatible with this or not.
Please let me know

Hi
If you are using EP 7.0, then NWDS 7.0.YY version need to be used. //YY depends on your patch of EP7 .As you have mentioned your are using NWDS 7.0.12, that means your portal SP level is SP12.
In my prject i am using JDK 1.4 for NWDS 7.0.15 and its works fine.I have asked two of my colleagues , they told that in their project they are using JDK 1.5 for EP 7.0 server and application is working fine for them.
So
Thanks
Susmita

Iplanet web server 6.0 sp 6 with jdk 1.4.2_10 and 1.4.2_10

Hi,
I am using iplanet webserver 6.0 sp 6. At present i am using jdk 1.3. Now i have to install jdk 1.4.2_10 version for my application. But in the release notes of iplanet webserver 6.0 sp 6 it was mentioned that this version is compatable with jdk 1.4.2_02. Any one please help how is it makes difference if i go ahead with jdk 1.4.2_10 version.
Thanks.

The release notes are pointing out that Sun has tested 6.0SP6 with 1.4.2_02. That doesn't mean that 6.0SP6 won't work with 1.4.2_10.
1.4.2_10 is a maintenance release. It should contain only bug fixes over 1.4.2_02. It should work. If it doesn't work, it's a bug in Sun's web server or Sun's JDK. In either case, Sun will need to fix it.
If you're concerned about supportability, please realize that 6.0SP6 itself has been superseded by 6.0SP11. If you do encounter problems, the first thing Sun's technical support staff will tell you to do is to apply SP11.

Version compatibility of 10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 with JDK 1.5.

hi buddies,
I want to know that whether
10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 with JDK 1.5. is Version compatibility
pls do send ur replies if known to you.

Hi ,
As far as I know AS 10.1.2.0.2 is Not certified with JDK 1.5.
Please see below some links where you can double-check this
1. OC4J with JDK 1.5 JSP compilation error
2. http://docs.huihoo.com/oracle/docs/B14099_19/web.1012/b14011/chap1.htm
"Only the JDK 1.3.1 and JDK 1.4 compilers are supported and certified by OC4J. It is possible to specify an alternative compiler by adding a <java-compiler> element to the server.xml file, and this might provide a workaround for the "classes not in packages" issue, but no other compilers are certified or supported by Oracle for use with OC4J."
3. "Certified JDKs" from
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/files/as_certification_r2_101202.html
BR,
Mihai

JDK 1.5 Serialization Compatibility with assert()

I have the following class:
class xyz implements java.io.Serializable {
   void doNothing() {
      int x = 0;
      assert x < 5;
}If I compile it on both JDK 1.4 (with -source=1.4) and 1.5 (with -source=1.5) platforms, the serialVersion IDs are different. If I comment out the assert statement, the serialVersion on 1.5 platform changes to be the same as the 1.4. If I rebuild the 1.4 with the assert commented out, the serialVersionID does not change.
Am I missing something here? I have code that needs to be compatible between these versions, but it now seems that the use of assert (other than the statment "assert true") built with 1.5 effects the serialization ID.

Sure, I can define my own version, but the point is that I've got many fielded classes that have not changed, but now will fail serialization when comunicating with the new system simply because of the use of assertions with 1.5.
It looks like I will be forced to either go back to 1.4, test all classes for serialization compatibility with 1.4, or remove the asserts from the code.
In any case, it does not make sence to me why adding an assertion should change the serialVersionUID of a class in the first place when compiling under 1.5 and not under 1.4.

FAST ESP 5.3 - is the FAST Search API of ESP 5.3 compatable with OS: Red Hat 5.1 & JDK: 1.6 Update 81 ?

FAST ESP 5.3 - is the FAST Search API of ESP 5.3 compatable with OS: Red Hat 5.1 & JDK: 1.6 Update 81 ?

Per ESP SP 5 release , below OS are supported which should be compatible with API:
 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Release 5.8, 32-bit (and all 5.x minor versions below)
 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Release 5.8, 64-bit (and all 5.x minor versions below)
 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Release 6.3, 32-bit (and all 6.x minor versions below)
 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Release 6.3, 64-bit (and all 6.x minor versions below)
 SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 11, 64-bit
The latest JDK i have seen working on a customer install is jdk1.6.0_45.
Probably you can try update 81 and see if you run into any issues.

Compatibility issues with JDK 1.6 Beta2

I have a program that stores objects in JE. We are currently using JDK1.5.0_07 and works quite well for our purpose. Using JDK 1.6 Beta2 resulted in silent incompatibilities. Though items are committed into the database, 0000000.jdb never grow more than 2KB in size (we have about 1000 records, usually taking up to 450KB in size). Closing the environment causes exceptions. Has anyone tested with JDK 6 yet?

We know of one Java 1.6 Beta issue resulting from a change in TreeSet, but it didn't cause the sort of problem you describe. We heard the following report from several users a few months ago about a new, transient exception seen from the log cleaner when running against 1.6. Although we added a simple check for nullness to JE to avoid the problem, I believe the TreeSet behavior was backed out of Java 1.6.
We haven't done extensive testing with Java 1.6, but we did run some tests sometime in the spring, and didn't notice any issues then. We know that some folks are at least trying 1.6 -- hopefully they can speak of their experience?
Here's the TreeSet issue as reported to us, and which we fixed in our current code line ...
In JDK1.6, the behavior of TreeSet changed slightly. Calling
TreeSet.remove(null) now throws a NullPointerException. When running
BDB-JE 3.0.12 and JDK 1.6 build 90, the cleaner logs these errors:
<Cleaner name="Cleaner-1"/> caught exception: java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.util.TreeMap.getEntry(TreeMap.java:324)
at java.util.TreeMap.remove(TreeMap.java:580)
at java.util.TreeSet.remove(TreeSet.java:259)
at com.sleepycat.je.cleaner.FileSelector.selectFileForCleaning(FileSelector.java:236)
at
com.sleepycat.je.cleaner.FileProcessor.doClean(FileProcessor.java:201)
at
com.sleepycat.je.cleaner.FileProcessor.onWakeup(FileProcessor.java:143)
at com.sleepycat.je.utilint.DaemonThread.run(DaemonThread.java:189)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Continuing
Here is the bug report requesting the change to TreeSet:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5045147
Is there the possibility that your application is hiding some exceptions? You say you see exceptions at Environment.close() time -- what are they? You may want to try the com.sleepycat.je.util.DbPrintLog utility (on a small log file) to see if there are any exception messages stored at the end of the log.
Regards,
Linda

OC4J 9.0.2 production with JDK 1.4.0: mostly broken

I have tried OC4J 9.0.2 production with several combinations of JDK 1.3.1 and JDK 1.4.0 for building, deploying, and running a simple, home-grown EJB-based web service. If I build the EAR file using JDK 1.3.1, it will run fine on OC4J using JDK 1.3.1 or JDK 1.4.0.
I have thus far found it to be impossible to build the EAR file using JDK 1.4.0 and have it run sucessfully on OC4J using either JDK 1.4.0 or JDK 1.3.1. I always get the following when attempting to invoke the web service via the generated Java proxy stubs:
5/8/02 7:33 PM database: oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet: init
5/8/02 7:33 PM database: 9.0.2.0.0 Started
5/8/02 7:33 PM database: oracle.j2ee.ws.SessionBeanWebService: init
5/8/02 7:33 PM database: Servlet error
oracle.j2ee.xanadu.JasperGenerationError: no source generated during code generation!: 1 in getFile name: com\mycompany\common\ejb\Info.class
1 in getFile name: com\mycompany\common\ejb\Info.java
error: error message 'class.format' not found
binary class definition not found: com.mycompany.common.ejb.Info
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.JavaWrapperGenerator.generate(JavaWrapperGenerator.java:267)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.RpcWebService.generateWrapperClass(RpcWebService.java:662)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.RpcWebService.generate(RpcWebService.java:436)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.RpcWebService.getWrapper(RpcWebService.java:767)
     at oracle.j2ee.ws.RpcWebService.doPost(RpcWebService.java:309)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:211)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:309)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:336)
     at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:652)
     at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:269)
     at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:735)
     at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:243)
     at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].util.ThreadPoolThread.run(ThreadPoolThread.java:64)
Notes:
1) When attempting to deploy onto an OC4J instance running on JDK 1.4.0, I have replaced the tools.jar file and modified the global-web-application.xml as per: ORA-92102 Timeout on Web Forms
2) I have verified that the EJB deploys correctly regardless of build and/or deployment environment.
3) Let's pretend that I can configure each of these environments to run under JDK 1.4.0 or JDK 1.3.1: run OC4J (fresh install), build ear, deploy ear, invoke web service. Here are the combinations I have tried:
BROKEN: run OC4J 1.4.0, build ear 1.4.0, deploy ear 1.4.0, invoke web service 1.4.0
WORKS: run OC4J 1.4.0, build ear 1.3.1, deploy ear 1.4.0, invoke web service 1.4.0
WORKS: run OC4J 1.4.0, build ear 1.3.1, deploy ear 1.3.1, invoke web service 1.3.1
WORKS: run OC4J 1.4.0, build ear 1.3.1, deploy ear 1.3.1, invoke web service 1.4.0
WORKS: run OC4J 1.3.1, build ear 1.3.1, deploy ear 1.3.1, invoke web service 1.3.1
WORKS: run OC4J 1.3.1, build ear 1.3.1, deploy ear 1.3.1, invoke web service 1.4.0
WORKS: run OC4J 1.3.1, build ear 1.3.1, deploy ear 1.4.0, invoke web service 1.4.0
WORKS: run OC4J 1.3.1, build ear 1.3.1, deploy ear 1.4.0, invoke web service 1.3.1
BROKEN: run OC4J 1.3.1, build ear 1.4.0, deploy ear 1.3.1, invoke web service 1.3.1
BROKEN: run OC4J 1.3.1, build ear 1.4.0, deploy ear 1.4.0, invoke web service 1.4.0
Is Oracle aware of this problem? What is causing it (e.g. class format change in classes compiled in JDK 1.4.0)? Are you working to fix it in the next release (either preview or production)?

I've also just downloaded JDK 1.4.0 and tried running the "Simple JSP Examples" that come with OC4J R2.
Of course these simple examples didn't even compile:
<blockquote>
500 Internal Server Error
OracleJSP: oracle.jsp.provider.JspCompileException:
Errors compiling:/oracle/product/ias9i/j2ee/home/application-deployments/default/defaultWebApp/persistence/_pages/_examples/_jsp/_num/_numguess.java
error: Invalid class file format in /oracle/product/j2sdk1.4.0/jre/lib/rt.jar(java/lang/Object.class). The major.minor version '48.0' is too recent for this tool to understand.
/oracle/product/ias9i/j2ee/home/application-deployments/default/defaultWebApp/persistence/_pages/_examples/_jsp/_num/_numguess.java:0: Class java.lang.Object not found in class com.orionserver.http.OrionHttpJspPage.
package examples.jsp._num;
^
2 errors
</blockquote>
So whose fault is this?
Is it my fault for not reading this forum before downloading the 40MB J2SE 1.4.0 install?
Is it Oracle's fault for failing to point out that OC4J is compatible with ONLY 1.3.1 ?
Is it Sun's fault for breaking compatibility with their own product? So much for write once run anywhere. This is not what Java was supposed to be about.

Please help me with JDK

Hi,
I download a JDK from this URL :
http://java.sun.com/j2se/
But, when I try to install it in windows 2000, I have an error message, that my file is corrupted.
I retry the download severals times, but I have a same error message.
When I verify a size for my file, it is always not equal to a size in the web site?? WHY ???
Can you help me please ??
Thank you for your quick reply.
Sam

You probally didn't download the whole thing.....probally need to dl it again...and make sure you get the one that is compatable with windows 2000.

Query on Driver Compatibility with Oracle 9i & Oracle 11g

Technical query on Driver Compatibility with Oracle 9i & Oracle 11g of our client scenario
1. There are 2 databases, FCDB and FCR DB. Both the databases are running on Oracle 9i. FCDB Application present is using the same version of JDBC driver (classes12.jar) to communicate with FCDB Local and FCR Host Database. And it is JDK 1.4 compliant.
2. We require upgrading the FCDB alone to 11g Release 1 and FCR DB with same Oracle 9i.
3. In this case, if the application is using the same version of JDBC driver (classes12.jar) to communicate with FCDB Local and FCR Host Database, will there be any issues.
4. Need to check if there is any issues related to the classes12.jar with 11g Release 1 DB whether oracle will extend their support to us and how and when they can they provide it.
5. If there are any issues, can that be resolved by Oracle Support?
Edited by: user13290657 on Mar 4, 2011 12:41 PM

This forum deals with migrations from foreign databases to Oracle.
You might better post your request in this forum:
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=288

Windows 8 and itunes 11 compatibility with an ipod

I have itunes11 and Windows 8. I've called Apple and I've talked to Microsoft. This was months ago. I can download itunes and run it from my laptop but am unable to sync my ipod. I get an error and it automatically reboots my computer. I was told there were known compatibility with itunes and Windows 8. This was months ago.
I know how to downgrade itunes to XP or Win 7. This is not the issue. I can download to my laptop and place, it will not sync to my ipod device (which is a fear years old), but when I did talk to support I was told that it was supported. The ipod was not the issue.. It was the incompatibility between the programs.
I see recent updates in the support community in the past month about production resolution but this still has not resolved my issue. I don't believe purchasing a new ipod is going to resolve the issue either.
If anyone has successfully developed a workaround or recently downloaded itunes11 w/ Windows 8 and can sync to an apple ipod I would love to know how you did it.
Kia
[email protected]

Im not sure that will solve the issue I have with itunes. I have a lenovo laptop and I think it's just an issue with Apple who has to modify the program for users of Windows 8 so that itunes can be used and to find purchased music. I found the music I purchased through itunes but it's not the full tracks. It said it allows me to download it fully so I can hear the whole track, but needs some kind of capatibility? I have no idea what the problem is. If someone has the answer knowing my computer brand and having windows 8 compatibility issues, please let me know what you suggest.

Is adobe photoshop cs2 compatable with windows 8?

Is adobe photoshop CS2 compatable with windows 8?

I have removed and re-installed CS2 twice now and still get the same library application error.
DO NOT INSTALL WINDOWS 8 ONTO YOUR COMPUTER IF YOU WANT TO KEEP CS2!
Telling us to spend more money to upgrade our software to meet OS does not show trust to the users. CS2 should be able to work with new OS systems and if not users should be allowed to update their current program for free to be able to use it on the new OS.
Thank you,
Eric

I have a serious (and bizarre!) issue with my novation impulse (Although i've tried it with two other keyboards and i still have the same problem) and its compatibility with mainstage 3

i have a serious (and bizarre!) issue with my novation impulse (Although i've tried it with two other keyboards and i still have the same problem) and its compatibility with mainstage 3.
the problem is best explained on the following one - page thread:
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3951518?start=0&tstart=0
(Clearly i'm not alone in this problem, although i think i figured out what's going wrong a little more than he did...read on!)
his solution, to put mainstage in jump mode, is very unsatisfactory to me, as it bounces all of a sudden to drastically different settings.
basically, my analysis is that my controller is NOT receiving MIDI date from mainstage. in other words, mainstage knows what my controller is doing, but my controller doens't know what mainstage is doing.
let's say i turn the knob all the way to the right ... 127...and the virtual fader goes to the right like it's supposed to.
now...next...let's say i change to a different patch, where that same VIRTUAL fader is not at the max clockwise position..maybe it's only at 1pm. now when i turn the physical knob to the RIGHT, the midi data is still at 127 on the controller! it didn't "reset" to sync up with the new level (say 80 or so) setting on the new patch. so i can't increase that new setting of 80 by continuing to turn the knob to the right. i have to turn it all the way to zero,...and then continue PAST zero until the controller thinks that IT is at 0...at that point the controller and mainstage are in agreement, and things work fine....so bascially, the keyboard thinks the level is at max...but mainstage thinks the level is at 1pm.
i am using Logic 9, and i have a macbook pro 2.9 Ghz I7 with 8 gigs of memory and OS X 10.8.4

Hi Josh,
Thanks for taking the time to contact us here a Novation for technical support. Lets continue to correspond via email so we can get your issue resolved.
Thanks.
Mike Towns

9.0.4 compatibility with jdk 1.5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for