About getting a wrong plan due to incorrect stats

Hi,
can someone give an example which demonstrate how wrong stats on a table lead to a different/inefficient execution plan? I tried one but in what I tried, optimizer picked same plan when stats were incorrect. What I tried was to have a table with two columns and an index on one column and select based on this column as below:
SQL> desc tab1
Name Null? Type
COL1 NOT NULL NUMBER
COL2 NUMBER
(there is an index i1 on table col1)
SQL> select num_rows from user_tables where table_name=
2 'TAB1';
NUM_ROWS
0
SQL> select count(*) from tab1;
COUNT(*)
10000
SQL> set autot on
SQL> select * from tab1 where col1=58398;
no rows selected
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 4092115641
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:
01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TAB1 | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00: <---oracle uses index when stats are not updated
01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I1 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:
01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("COL1"=58398)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
289 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
327 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processed
--now update stats
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(null,tabname=>'TAB1',cascade=>true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select * from tab1 where col1=58398;
no rows selected
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 4092115641
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 7 | 2 (0)| 00:00:
01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TAB1 | 1 | 7 | 2 (0)| 00:00: <--same plan of acess by index row id)
01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I1 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:
01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("COL1"=58398)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
289 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
327 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processed
SQL>
In the example I tried, oracle picks the same plan whether stats are updated or not - I am trying to get one example where oracle picks wrong plan (due to incorrect stats).
thanks

It doesn't matter whether or not you have the cheapest or most expensive voice and text plants, smartphones require a data plan to be eligible for a discount. It should be the same for the iPhone 4.
As for any work discount, I don't think you need to do anything to continue to receive it. I receive a discount for working with the government and I didn't need to do anything when I changed my plan a couple of times before.

Similar Messages

  • If a student doesn't want to give or have a social security number, how does he/she go about getting the installment plan with the new MacBook Pro? Can he/she still get the student discount if a co-signer who is not a student puts down his/her information

    Anyone know how to go about this?

    Payment plans are contracts.  Contracts require personal information.  The only way for your SSN (most people have one assigned by parents before age 1) to NOT appear on the contract is if your name does not appear on the contract and you have no legal responsibility.

  • Not able to get the actual plan from trace file

    Hi all
    I have a Db package and want to get actual execution plan of all the statements in that pakcage it does provides the plan for System's statements but does not displays the plan for Sql statements
    DB version 9.2.0 using the following sequence of insructions
    set timing on
    set serveroutput on
    alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever ,level 12';
    begin
    run_service.collect_data(sysdate);
    end;
    alter session set sql_trace=false;
    exit; ---exit from Sql
    now look at the output
    select distinct obj#,containerobj#,pflags,xpflags,mflags
    from
    sum$, suminline$ where sumobj#=obj# and inline#=:1
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 1 1 0 0
    total 3 0.00 0.00 1 1 0 0
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
    Parsing user id: SYS (recursive depth: 2)
    Rows Row Source Operation
    0 SORT UNIQUE
    0 NESTED LOOPS
    0 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SUMINLINE$
    0 INDEX RANGE SCAN I_SUMINLINE$_2 (object id 1614116)
    0 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID SUM$
    0 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN I_SUM$_1 (object id 319)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    db file sequential read 1 0.00 0.00
    SELECT SEQ_NUM, S_DATE, S_TIME, CSTATUS, G_SERVICE,
    B_REFERENCE, V_REFERENCE, M_PRIORITY
    FROM GL_HIST
    ORDER BY S_DATE DESC, S_TIME DESC
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.01 0.01 0 0 0 0
    Execute 2819 0.37 0.32 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 2819 2.50 20.47 2786 20164 0 2819
    total 5639 2.88 20.81 2786 20164 0 2819
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
    Parsing user id: 15550 (recursive depth: 1)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    db file sequential read 2786 0.05 18.19
    latch free 4 0.04 0.06
    UPDATE G_ORIG SET G_SERVICE = :B1
    WHERE
    SEQ_NUM = :B5 AND S_DATE = :B4 AND S_TIME = :B3 AND
    C_STATUS = :B2 AND NVL(G_SERVICE, '+') <> NVL(:B1, '+')
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 1 0.00 0.03 0 0 0 0
    Execute 3731 0.74 0.99 261 18712 119 54
    Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    total 3732 0.74 1.02 261 18712 119 54
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
    Parsing user id: 15550 (recursive depth: 1)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
    Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
    ---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
    db file sequential read 261 0.01 0.19
    latch free 9 0.01 0.04
    COMMIT

    Remove the line alter session set sql_trace=false and just exit/disconnect. The explain plain is contained in the STAT lines in the trace file and are only written when the cursor closes. If you turn off tracing before the cursor closes the STAT lines will not get written.

  • Still getting Display Error in PE8: "Display performance will be poor due to Incorrectly..."

    I recently updated my OS from Windows Vista (32-Bit) to Windows 7 (64-Bit).  When working with PE8 in Windows Vista, I would receive the following error (signified by a red X in the lower left hand corner of the screen) whenever opening an existing project or creating a new one "Display Performance will be poor due to incorrectly operating graphics card or driver!"  To my consternation, I'm getting the same message after updating my OS with a CLEAN INSTALL of Window 7 64-bit.  I have the latest, stable Nvidia card driver 196.21 and have installed the latest patch from Adobe 8.0.1.  I'm interested to see if anyone is having this reoccurring GPU-incompatibility problem after installing the new patch.
    Any solutions that don't involve simply turning off GPU playback are much appreciated.
    As this is not a "workflow" problem I don't see the need in displaying an exhaustive list of all of my Computer assets.  However, here are the basics.:
    Computer: HP Pavillion M9150f
    Processor: Intel Quad-Core Q6600 2.4 GHZ
    Ram: 8 GB
    Video Card: Nvidia GTS 250 1gb Ram, Latest WQHL Nvidia Driver 196.21
    I have no other Video-Editing software installed, not even windows movie maker.
    Any help with this problem would be much appreciated.

    Adobe's silence on the issue leads one to believe they simply cant fix it.
    That could well be a reason. However, if history is any indicator, Adobe is always tight-lipped about any plans, or works in progress, until they are ready for "prime time." Recently, a lot of podcasts and blog-spot pieces began appearing on changes in PrPro CS5. Many of these are directly related to GPU acceleration with certain nVidia cards, and a totally new render engine, Mercury. Still, other than some observations from select personnel, and a few demo videos, the complete details have not come forth. Also, there has been caution that Mercury might NOT make it into CS5. Only time will tell. So silence is not new from Adobe, and there could be various reasons for it, from re-coding being an impossible task to the patch/fix not being quite ready for release. PrPro CS4 got three significant updates, plus updates to Encore and AME. It was only about one week before those releases, that a single word hit the fora.
    Good luck,
    Hunt
    HERE was the "sneak peak" on Mercury.
    HERE is a thread on nVidia support for it.

  • Budget billing plan is inconsistent due to incorrect log. line numbering

    Hello All,
    We are facing an issue with Budget Billing Plan Change(EA62)/Display(EA63).
    Issue details are as follows.
    -       Initially BBP had 2 products and I partially billed both products and Then I moved out one product and Then I invoiced that one and Then I partially billed the remaining product.
    -      Now if i am trying to open the Budget Billing Plan using EA62/63,i am getting the following error.
             Budget billing plan is inconsistent due to incorrect log. line numbering,Message No: TU397.
              We have applied note no : 0001969117.
             Still we are facing the same issue, Kindly help me on this.

    Hello All,
    We are facing an issue with Budget Billing Plan Change(EA62)/Display(EA63).
    Issue details are as follows.
    -       Initially BBP had 2 products and I partially billed both products and Then I moved out one product and Then I invoiced that one and Then I partially billed the remaining product.
    -      Now if i am trying to open the Budget Billing Plan using EA62/63,i am getting the following error.
             Budget billing plan is inconsistent due to incorrect log. line numbering,Message No: TU397.
              We have applied note no : 0001969117.
             Still we are facing the same issue, Kindly help me on this.

  • User is getting locked due to incorrect password every few minutes SAPJSF

    I have gone through solution manager configuration both as myself and as user solman_admin. Recently the Solution manager system was changed to enforce a more complex password scheme. After changing my password, my account is now getting locked every few minutes due to incorrect logon attempts. The System log states that user SAPJSF from Terminal <solution Manager host name> is attempting to login with my userID and is locking it. so far I have made every change I know to make to all the accounts on the JAVA side and to any and all background jobs that are running to remove my userID from these entries. My account still gets locked and I have no idea where to find what task or process is locking the account.
    Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

    I have checked the audit log and it is not very helpful. Here are the results
    Date     Date/Time     User     Terminal name     Transaction Code     Program     Message Text
    11/12/2010     9:29:39 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Password check failed for user BSEWELL in client 001
    11/12/2010     9:29:39 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Logon Failed (Reason = 1, Type = U)
    11/12/2010     9:29:39 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Password check failed for user BSEWELL in client 001
    11/12/2010     9:29:39 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Logon Failed (Reason = 1, Type = U)
    11/12/2010     9:29:44 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Password check failed for user BSEWELL in client 001
    11/12/2010     9:29:44 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Logon Failed (Reason = 1, Type = U)
    11/12/2010     9:29:44 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Password check failed for user BSEWELL in client 001
    11/12/2010     9:29:44 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Logon Failed (Reason = 1, Type = U)
    11/12/2010     9:31:30 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Password check failed for user BSEWELL in client 001
    11/12/2010     9:31:30 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     User BSEWELL Locked in Client 001 After Erroneous Password Checks
    11/12/2010     9:31:30 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Logon Failed (Reason = 1, Type = U)
    11/12/2010     9:31:30 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Logon Failed (Reason = 53, Type = U)
    11/12/2010     9:32:36 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Logon Failed (Reason = 53, Type = U)
    11/12/2010     9:32:36 AM     SAPJSF     wsapvsmsdb.png.loc          SAPMSSY1     Logon Failed (Reason = 53, Type = U)

  • I use my mac book to dj. however, i tend to get the beach ball alot. is this due to lack of memory or is it something else. ive been thinking about getting more memory but i am not sure what the issue is

    I use my mac book to dj. however, i tend to get the beach ball alot. is this due to lack of memory or is it something else. ive been thinking about getting more memory but i am not sure what the issue is...i would like some advice before i go and buy more memory if it is not needed... i also do not keep my music on my lap top

    Okay, so we've eliminated the lack of space since you have plenty.
    See the screenshot from my Mac here:
    Page ins and page outs - post those (or just post the same type of screenshot). If you have a lot of those, that means that your machine needs to keep swapping RAM around to make the best of what is available which can result in slow responses.
    Also post the total amount of RAM you have (in my case, I have 12 GB)
    You free RAM of 221 MB is very, very low - I'm guessing you only have a total of 2 GB. If that is the case, I would absolutely max out the machine (if you don't know how much RAM you can put in, post your model number here so we can help with that).

  • Net due date incorrect in FBL3N report

    Hi,
    Net due date is coming correctly in Vendor Display report FBL1N, however the same entry when we see in reconciliation account in FBL3N we get the wrong due date. We are going thorough GL head to get the correct amount which is tallying with f.08 data for ageing group-wise. For this reason net due date is required.
    Let me know if there is any other way I can proceed.
    Regards,
    Devdatth

    Hi,
    Waiting for reply.
    I need to know, why in FBL1N we get the correct net due date and in FBl3N get incorrect net due date.
    For example:
    in FBL1N the entry is-
    doc date           Baseline date           Net due date             Pay terms
    08.10.2012         08.11.2012              08.12.2012                30 days
    the same entry in FBL3N is-
    doc date           Baseline date          Net due date              Pay terms 
    08.10.2012        08.11.2012              08.11.2012                 30 days  
    i.e in FBL3N report also the same date 08.12.2012 should appear. But the report is showing incorrect date.
    Regards,
    Devdatth

  • Thinking about Moves with my Plan and Future, Help Appreciated

    OK so this was the deal with my plan currently, is that right now im looking to save money on my phone bill every month and im being given the big run around with my Talk/Text/Data Promotion where i keep being told my data discount of 9.99 would come off and so far this month too it did not come off. The woman in Promotions department apparently fixed my account which not sure if she did and the problem with the whole thing is that different reps keep telling me i can only get my employee discount on my voice or the data discount which of course is wrong because the promo woman over the phone told me i can receive both and the loyalty reps over the phone keep giving me different stories and im tired of it. This was the reason i extended my contract for a bit to get this discount and its getting very frustrated about it!!
    The other thing was i was thinking about switching carriers when my contract is up because my bill has been pretty high the past couple of months and it makes no sense to early terminate my 2nd line because my ex gf upgraded to a smartphone and jacked up the fee. My mom hardly uses the 2nd line and i would like to cancel it but because its too high it makes no point to do that since both our contracts are up in a year. I was thinking about going to a basic phone to cut my data plan prices because the only cheapest verizon has is the 30 dollar plan. I don't use my data plan too much but i heard if i go to a basic phone and within 14 days i go back to a smartphone i can get my unlimited data back. So idk if this is true or not. But its gotten to the point that these smartphone plans and contracts are a bit much now. So if there is a Verizon rep that can chime in and see what can be done or discuss with me about options, that would be greatly appreciated. Otherwise i just had to vent about the issue with my current bill at this moment. So just was saying.

    To answer SuzyQ, my ex gf is off my account because of problems with her being on it (being late all the time, messing up my credit) and she wasn't choosing to fix her problems by doing and AOL because of her credit which Verizon wanted 400 and she didn't want to do it. Long story short, she lied to me about her AOL deposit amount just to stay on my account for a few more years (hence the early upgrade). So thats why shes no longer with my account.
    To answer AZS, your right my mom HAS a basic phone now and does not have data. My problem is that i have data on my plan which im trying to cut back on the cost of the plan and so far, i really wish Verizon would let me have that Talk/Text/Data promotion where it was 9.99 for the unlimited data and it would really help my bill alot. Of course i had a hard time getting it and one of the reps who i dealt with about getting it was very rude with me and she didn't care about satisfying the problem or the plan with me.
    But both lines have less than a year left so when the time comes, its time to move to something cheaper and better for me no contract wise. Unless anyone has something else to throw in their opinion of.

  • Store rep signed me up under the wrong plan and no one in customer service has fixed it in over a month

    I was bait and switched. I signed up under the pretense that I was getting the promotional rate of 40gb/$150 that was scheduled to end on November 5 2014.
    I walked  into a Verizon wireless store on November 4th with the intent to trade in my iPhone 5s which I was offered $350 trade in value and port over 2 of my lines with T-Mobile under the Verizon promotion. Once I was approved and offered my trade in I was told that the phones I was seeking to purchase from Verizon was not in stock and needed to be ordered, and delivered separately with the iPhone 6 being shipped out November 14 and the iPhone 6+ shipped November 21. Thomas, the Verizon wireless sales representative, also informed me that for me to get the promotional rate I would have to open the account with an active line before the 5th or I wouldn't be able to get the promotional rate since the phones would be delivered past the promotional date period. The sales representative insisted I should add an iPad that  was in stock at the store and I could leave the store with an active account and once my phones were delivered I would be all set to go with my promotional plan and devices. I had no need for an iPad but decided it was worth getting for the sake of the promotion.
    ON November 14 I recieved via FedEx a package containing not a iPhone 6 as promised, but a iPhone 6+. I called Verizon to activate the phone that was ported to my personal phone number, and didn't have my iPhone 6 that was set to port my out of state business line and cancel service with T-Mobile on the 14th of November. To say the least I was extremely upset for which I had no means of recieving business calls from North Carolina while I live in Florida. At that point I asked the Verizon customer care representative I had on the phone to see if they could see if there was a store that had the iphone 6 I ordered in stock so that I an could have a business phone the same day. He found a store that had it in stock and it happened to be the store I originally signed up at. I was told that it was in the color and storage capacity I had originally ordered and that I could pick it up at the store to complete my purchase with Verizon. Again, for the sake of having a business line I ran to the store and spoke with Thomas and explained the mix up. upon moving forward I was informed that they had an iPhone 6 in stock with the capacity I had requested but not the same color I had ordered. At that point I didn't care I just needed a phone and proceeded to activate the phone he had in stock And ported over my business line.
    After recieving a text from Verizon that I had consumed all of my data just days after I recieved my phones I called Verizon 611 from my phone and spoke to a customer care representative named Fallon, which informed me I was set up on the wrong plan and that she see's the notes that Thomas notated that I was subscribing for a 40gb plan and that she was going to send a  request I D # [removed] form to make the corrections and that there was no need for me to cancel service as I was within my cancelation period, again she insisted that there was no need to cancel and that the request would be granted and she would be calling me once my billing cycle reset and the corrections were made and she would credit my account based on the promotional rate. I NEVER RECIEVED A CALL FROM FALLON! Not even to be notified that the request was denied! I came to realize later in December when I recieved a $1200 bill that this wasn't resolved. I called customer service again and spoke with a gentleman that explained the request was denied and that this will be resolved after I explained what transpired. He assured me that he was going to expedite another request and he would be in contact with me within a few hours....... I'm still waiting for his call as well!
    I called again several times in the past few days and have spoken to several supervisors that promised to resolve this matter and call me back promptly........ Again, no one has called me back!
    December the 8th I spoke with a supervisor named Victoria which assured me she would get this resolved within the next 24 hours and gave me her direct number to reach her if I didn't hear from her [removed], again I haven't heard from her yet and I've made several attempts to reach her at her direct line to no avail.
    December the 9th I spoke with supervisor named Mike employee #[removed] in the Seattle call center, he appoligized for the mix up and that no one has called me back and that he would handle this matter and get back to me today December 10th....... Again no call..... I have spoken to 3 people today all which have made promises to call me back today within a few hours and none that have. I just got off the phone with a supervisor named Vanessa Jentfield at the Chicago call center and saw all the notations and assured me that there is no reason why this shouldn't be corrected and that she would be calling me back tonight or tomorrow. I will be sitting by the phone unless Verizon wireless decides to disconnect my service for non payment of $1200+.........
    I have filed a complaint giving a detailed explanation of what has transpired with the FCC as well as the FTC, my next step is to file a small claims lawsuit tomorrow morning with the state of Florida and see if Verizon finds a way to contact me then,I guess I will just have to wait and see.
    Personal information removed as required by the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service
    Message was edited by: Admin Moderator

    It was a good idea to file a complaint with the FCC, someone from Verizon will contact you by phone in an effort to  resolve your issue. I wouldn't suggest small claims court as they have not done anything illegal, (just bad customer service) and their contract with you is usually upheld, which in this case is not for the plan you want. The person contacting you likely has a little more pull, as the call centers can only uphold the written customer agreement made.

  • I want to get off the plan start a new account but can't contact account owner

    Hi,
    My brother and I have been on the "NATIONWIDE TLK&TXT SHARE 700" plan and the account owner is a friend of our family.
    I have almost fulfilled my two year contract (it will be over in about 1 month) and we would like to upgrade to a new Iphone and put my name as the account owner (none of us had enough credit by the time we got these phones from Verizon, but now we are able to pay our bills and would like to be responsible and keep privacy).
    I've noticed that in order to accomplish AoL, curruent account owner needs to call Verizon and authorizes the account transfer, but the problem is, I haven't been able to contact her for a month(she won't answer the phone and no call back has been received...).
    So I was thinking I should just give up keeping my number and start a new contract and a plan with my brother.
    My question is, as just an account member (not owner or manger), can my brother and I get off the plan without owner's permission? She and I are not on the same plan and she actually gave me some kind of password so that I could manage some stuffs with customer service. I was actually able to cancel my mother's line from the family plan one year ago with that password , but I wonder if I could do the same thing with both my brother's and my lines without owner's permission.
    If I can do that, is there any way to keep my numbers when starting a new account without having current account owner involved since I can't reach her? 
    If I start a new account and a plan with my brother and get the phone with 2-year-contract, rather than just upgrading to an iphone (while keeping my number under the current account owner like now), how much money will I be losing? Would it be a lot?

    whatwhywhere wrote:
    My question is, as just an account member (not owner or manger), can my brother and I get off the plan without owner's permission? She and I are not on the same plan and she actually gave me some kind of password so that I could manage some stuffs with customer service. I was actually able to cancel my mother's line from the family plan one year ago with that password If you were able to do this, then you must be an account manager
    , but I wonder if I could do the same thing with both my brother's and my lines without owner's permission.
    If I can do that, is there any way to keep my numbers when starting a new account without having current account owner involved since I can't reach her? If you are an account manager, I would think you should be able to accomplish this. You should call *611 or go into a Verizon store to find out.
    If I start a new account and a plan with my brother and get the phone with 2-year-contract, rather than just upgrading to an iphone (while keeping my number under the current account owner like now), how much money will I be losing? Would it be a lot?
    If you start a new Family Plan with 2 lines instead of remaining part of a Family Plan with 3(or more) lines, you could end up paying more. Not knowing what your arrangement is, though, we cannot begin to tell you how much more you would be paying.
    For example:
    700 minute Family Plan with unlimited texting for 2 lines would be $99.98/month + tax for a total of ~$50/person.
    700 minute Family Plan with unlimited texting for 3 lines would be $109.97/month + tax for a total of $37/person.
    Any add ons such as insurance, data, etc... would of course be extra. You may also have to pay a security deposit in addition if you do not have much of a credit history.

  • Delivery date getting calculated wrongly in delivery created via VL10D

    Hi Gurus,
    We have a strange issue, where in delivery date is getting calculated wrongly for replenishment delivery created via VL10D.
    When we are creating via VL10D , delivery date is getting the additional 30 days from MaxDlvCrteDate . With initial investigation i see that VL10D has delivery creation profile 0101 for which no of days maintained in max delv creation date is 30 .
    I assume that the delivery date is getting the additional days from delivery creation profile felid no of max delv creation date .
    I have created the delivery on 24.03.2011, as per the route no of TL time is 9 days , So Ideally the delivery date should be 04.04.2011 , however system has calculated it as 23.04.2011
    Delivery no             No of days in MaxDlvCrteDate                        Delivery  date
    213443158                           30                                                       23.04.2011
    If I create the delivery for the same PO using t-code VL10B, then delivery date is calculating correctly.
    Not sure why system behavior is strange.
    Please help me with your inputs to resolve the issue..
    Thanks in advance

    Please request one Abaper  to solve this problem.
    You cannot due nothing as the problem is in Code.
    Regards
    William

  • My daughter has disabled her iPhone 4 due to incorrect password. how do i fix

    My daughter has disabled her iPhone 4. Due to incorrect password. It shows phone is disabled connect to itunes. It  only lets me make
    Emergency calls. I have never synced it to computer or anything. Please help me fix. I've been told I have to go to Apple store in Atlanta. Thanks

    Open iTunes on computer, connect iPhone to computer with USB Cable, hold both home and power buttons for about 20 seconds until iTunes recognizes iPhone in Recovery Mode, click Restore button of iTunes.

  • My i pod 2 gen is disabled due to incorrect password how do i fix this?

    my i pod 2 gen is disabled due to incorrect password how do i fix this?

    Follow the instructions here:
    iPhone, iPad, iPod touch: Wrong passcode results in red disabled screen

  • Wrong planned cost calculation while actual is calculating correct for internal activities

    Dear all,
    I am facing an issue in which when i am doing network costing with work center, activity type, cost center and giving per hour rate in KP26. System is calculating correct actual cost but every time its calculating wrong planned cost. For example: If i have given per hour rate 60 usd when planning for 100 hrs in cj20n its showing 2500 while confirmation is working correct and for 10 hrs its showing actual cost of 600.
    I have checked work kp26 also report KBST to make sure about rate. Also i have checked configuration related costing variant planned and actual and its standard PS02 and PS03.
    I will really appreciate suggestions or some one face similar issue and got it resoved.
    Thanks.

    Dear All, this issue is resloved. I didnt give quantity in KP26. However i am more curious that most of the time i dont give any quantity in kp26 and always system works fine and calculate correct cost than why this time its calculating wrong planned cost.
    Thanks all.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Infinity - BT Lack of real communication

    I see KerryG has several posts on Infinity and why so many people can’t get it. These seem to be standard excuses and frustrating for people wish to plan their communications needs.  I am looking at Satellite broadband as a way of exceeding BT’s path

  • Search doesn't work in generated WebHelp

    I am using RoboHelp10 as part of TCS4. If I generate Microsoft HTML Help, the .chm file produced has perfect search capability. However, if I generate WebHelp, no matter what I search for, nothing is found. (Obviously I'm searching for words which I

  • EIS server goign down very frequently.....

    Hi we refresh cubes on a daily basis using scripts and there are 3 cubes which are refreshed daily . I dont know why the EIS server is going down since 2 weeks very often causing the other cubes to fail. when i see the log it says that there must be

  • Form's Port Configuration Doubt

    Hi, I installed weblogic 10.3.4 on Windows Server 2008 R2 64 bits and Forms 11g 11.1.1.4 afer form's intallation i save the installation's resume, this is the resume i got: Oracle Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer Installation                 Con

  • Best way to update Genre

    I have a library (15GB) of music that I have accumulated over the years outside of itunes. I got most of it from the Zune market place and really don't like the way they have labeled the genre tag of most of the music. When I try to use the "Get CD T