About Tcode of project type in upgrade project

Dear,
Could you tell me what are the tcodes for below project types.
ECSD
PFCS
PMKS
POCS
PSCS

Project type is used primarily for the reporting purpose. Say if you are large no of reports and you want a report of the perticular type of project at that time it will be helpful to you.
If you are not using nothing direct inmpact on your porject. However by not using we are loosing one standard option of reporting.
If you take up any standard report of PS > you will find there dynamic selection button ( SHIFT+ F4)> click on WBs master data --> give your project type there -->project / WBS give blind finder * --> Execute report.
This is the best use of the project type,
I hope it will clear to you now.
Regrds
Nitin

Similar Messages

Question about Managing SAP ERP 6.0 Upgrade Projects

Hi experts,
Some questions in this link(google: Managing SAP ERP 6.0 Upgrade Projects and download PDF)
http://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=Managing_SAP_ERP_60_Upgrades_SAP_PRESS_sample&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CDgQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.techtarget.com%2FsearchSAP%2Fdownloads%2FManaging_SAP_ERP_60_Upgrades_SAP_PRESS_sample.pdf&ei=vTsVT7PKI4T6mAXL0czcAw&usg=AFQjCNFq83vYG3k14xC5tcoYy96PfllYFw
1. Is figure 5.3 in page 165 correct?
I think it should be
Temporary system: DEV 6.0
Productive system: DEV' 4.6C -> QAS 4.6C -> PRD 4.6C
2. Is this transport route possible?
"During this phase, you continue dual maintenance of the development
systems. You also transfer changes that you make in DEV' to DEV, and
transport changes to both quality assurance systems."
DEV' 4.6C -> DEV 6.0 -> QAS 6.0 -> QAS' 4.6C
If we modified some standard programs and transport between two different SAP versions, I think the programs can't work, right?

> 1. Is figure 5.3 in page 165 correct?
> I think it should be
> Temporary system: DEV 6.0
> Productive system: DEV' 4.6C -> QAS 4.6C -> PRD 4.6C
>
> 2. Is this transport route possible?
> "During this phase, you continue dual maintenance of the development
> systems. You also transfer changes that you make in DEV' to DEV, and
> transport changes to both quality assurance systems."
> DEV' 4.6C -> DEV 6.0 -> QAS 6.0 -> QAS' 4.6C
> If we modified some standard programs and transport between two different SAP versions, I think the programs can't work, right?
Here, you need to do manual replication between both development system. No transport is possible because of different versions. I am not sure about the document that you posted but same is explained very well in upgrade guide. Please check there.
Thanks
Sunny

On iprocurement page..How to populate task field dependent on Project lov field value which Project type is "Capital Project Type"

Hi,
I have an requirement on Iprocurement page where in i have to populate task field as CAPL in case my project field contains the project which is of type 'Capital Project Type'.
Please suggest how can we implement this.
Thanks,
Abhishek

try these links:
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/103682/autopopulate-form-fields-based-on-selection-in-people-picker-column-using-javasc
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/80261/people-picker-not-getting-populated-in-the-sharepoint-site
http://blogs.technet.com/b/anneste/archive/2011/11/02/how-to-create-an-infopath-form-to-auto-populate-data-in-sharepoint-2010.aspx

How to change the project type of inprogress project

How to change the project type of in-progress project, The project type is Testing and need to change it to basic project plan.

Another way is to click on the top right button of the project center ribbon, after selecting the project. Note that this way works for one project at a time whereas toon's reply works for bulk edit.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, MCP |

Difference in Project Types and Solution Directory

Hi -
We are in the process of deploying solution manager within our organiation. We have a made good progress in designing the end to end processes for an implementation project. I am now looking for guidance on after the project is in production how to make changes - bugs and enhancements. Should this be done directly in the solution directory or a specific project type? We are not using CHaRM. If it is a project type, when should changes be made directly within the solution directory?
Also, what are the difference in the project types - implementation, upgrade, maintenance, safeguarding, template, and upgrade. When should each be used?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Janice,
you have two options to do changes in operations:
Directly in Solution Directory. However, there are some limitation since not all tabs can be changed (e. g. configuration tab is only available in display mode).
Via a maintenance project. This functionality is available since Solution Manager 4.0 FP 1. You have to assign a maintenance project to your solution and activate the check-out/check-in functionality (in the "solution settings"). It will the be possible to check-out objects into the maintenance project and perform your changes in the maintenance project. These changes will become visible in Solution Directory as soon as you check-in the objects. This functionality is currently independent of CHaRM.
An overview of the project types is available in the Solution Manager Application help. Follow the path "Projects--> Project Administration --> Project types".
Best regards,
Michael

Project Type Update more than 1 project at a time

Hi All,
Is there a possibility to change project type of more than 1 or should I say in bulk update project types for existing Projects in Project Center??
Regards, Syed Faizan ur Rehman, CBPM®,PRINCE2®, MCTS

Hi Syed,
Yes it is. Go to the server settings, then change or restart workflow. From this page, you will be able to choose a source EPT and projects then a destination EPT. Note that you can use this feature evenif you don't use workflows.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg188108(v=office.14).aspx
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

Adding Project Type as a characteristic in CJE1 Report Painter

How do I add the Characteristic/Field "Project Type" to CJE1 Report Painter so the field can be used in reporting?
thank you,
Todd

Hi,
I could not understand "Project Type" exactly, maybe Project Profile or.,.. but you can enhance any charcteristics with using customer enhancement: KAP10001. please check SAP note 454509. Hope this helps.
best regards, Takashi

Upgrade projects and Compare and ajust func.???

Hi All.
I am trying setting up a demo of the benefits using SolMan for upgrade projects with Compare and Adjust functionality.
I am following a guide with the following steps:
1. Create an Implementation project with some processes from BPR (Using SAP R/3 Enterprise 4.7 as logical component).
2. Model (change) the processes to simulate that a not fully SAP std. process is used at this compagny.
3. Copy the implementation project to an Upgrade Project (with option "Adjust target project to original of the source project".
4. Adding logical component SAP R/3 ECC 6.0 to the system landscape.
5. Executing transaction SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE for the Upgrade project.
Now, when I go to the project, I see no marking of changes anywhere...
Could this be because I am using the wrong processes in my Implementation project from BPR?
Does anyone have a good example of processes that can be good to demo this?
Thanks in advance!
/Per

Hi All.
I am trying setting up a demo of the benefits using SolMan for upgrade projects with Compare and Adjust functionality.
I am following a guide with the following steps:
1. Create an Implementation project with some processes from BPR (Using SAP R/3 Enterprise 4.7 as logical component).
2. Model (change) the processes to simulate that a not fully SAP std. process is used at this compagny.
3. Copy the implementation project to an Upgrade Project (with option "Adjust target project to original of the source project".
4. Adding logical component SAP R/3 ECC 6.0 to the system landscape.
5. Executing transaction SA_PROJECT_UPGRADE for the Upgrade project.
Now, when I go to the project, I see no marking of changes anywhere...
Could this be because I am using the wrong processes in my Implementation project from BPR?
Does anyone have a good example of processes that can be good to demo this?
Thanks in advance!
/Per

NW2004s Upgrade Project Plan

Hello Gurus,
Need to make an Excel/ MS Project based NW2004s Upgrade Project Plan, which covers all major activities with approximate durations.
I understand, it will largely depend on any customer's specific landscape, yet assuming some existing BW version, R/3, EP, CRM and non-SAP systems in any landscape, there can be a fairly common 'template' for making such plan.
Can somebody guide on where such a plan can be found?
Regards
Manish Madhav

Hi,
There are some documents like
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b4f8c290-0201-0010-8695-95342ff06094
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b8d163a7-0301-0010-d9b0-98f692ea3c60
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1094f43d-20c1-2910-c08c-928cecc93e04
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6b87e090-0201-0010-e1ad-ca4d412e6535
/people/tommy.alexander4/blog/2007/04/15/planning-for-a-combined-sap-upgrade-and-technology-refresh
but not an XLS template
Eddy
PS. Reward useful answers and earn points yourself

Eclipse Confusion: Different project types

I have a JSP project that I'm working on in Eclipse. It's such a pain because I need different project functionality like JSP, JSF, JBossIDE, etc...the problem is that each functionality is part of a different project type.
i.e. When you select File -> New -> Project, there are different project types. Any project can only have one type (or can it?). So if I need multiple functionality within a project, how do I make this happen?
Obviously you wouldn't limit yourself to just one functionality because of the IDE's limitation...
Is it possible to combine multiple projects into one complete project? This seems like such a disgusting and difficult solution...files split apart into different projects just because one uses JSP and another uses JSF and another uses EJB...
How do you deal with this?

Is that possible?
If no,what else solutions can I have for choice to achieve the goal.
Can make against the reservation and do goods movement into different accounting subject.

Some problems about Upgrad project

Dear,
    I have some question for Upgrade project.shi
P1: in form ZSD_EXPORT_FECO, check texts, Windows F005 has an error :
     /: AND &V55EFECO-REMA_TEXT2& = ' '
               Unknown command
       I dont know how to correct it.
P2: in program ZFUMSV00, the source code is   sy-repid    = 'RFUMSV00'.
     In 700 version, it checks error: the field sy-repid cant be changed.
     But, in 46c version, it is OK.
        I dont know how to correct it.

Hi
check this doc
While doing Upgrade You have to aware of all related program like BDC's , Screens related errors and all dictionary related problems.
Some function modules may become obsolete, and some screens will change
and some new fields will be added in the new versions etc.
Also take care of SPAU and SPDD tcodes.
You should be able to know about Unicode concept in sap.
check this
http://www.thespot4sap.com/upgrade_guide_v2.pdf#search=%22upGRADE%20STEPS%20-%20SAP%22
also chk these 2 notes in service.sap.com
Technical Upgrade is only a version upgrade without any functionality changes.
The objects that are needed to be upgraded are:
Includes
Function Groups / Function Modules
Programs / Reports
OSS Notes
SAP Repository Objects
SAP Data Dictionary Objects
Domains, Data Elements
Tables, Structures and Views
Module Pools, Sub Routine pools
BDC Programs
Print Programs
SAP Scripts, Screens
User Exits
You can refer to the below links for more information on technical upgrade:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/07/upgradeFROMR3TOmySAPERP-PARTII&
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/UPGRADEFROMR3TOmySAPERP-PARTIII
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/60/d6ba7bceda11d1953a0000e82de14a/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2e/6d66647d9011d396b60000e82de14a/content.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5ac31178-0701-0010-469a-b4d7fa2721ca
Regards
Anji

Regarding information on Upgrade Project

Hi Experts,
I would like to know more details about Upgrade Project. What are the technical and functional tasks will be there in the process of Upgrade.
Please help me this because i'll be starting my work in Upgrade Project in another 2 days.
Thanks in advance
Tanveer

Hi,
first of all upgrade is nothing but
Upgrade is nothing but installing a new version of software which have more functionality earlier version.
in Upgrade mainly three types
1.Technical Upgrade
2.Functional Upgrade
3.Strategic upgrade
Technical upgrade : is a fast upgrade without additional functionality but with minor user interface changes, to ensure business continuity. This upgrade type includes a cleanup of the system without implementing additional functionality, as well as technology upgrade with the opportunity to eliminate not used modifications and custom developments.
Functional upgrade : Is built on the technical upgrade, the functional upgrade provides in addition the opportunity to implement new functionalities in area like FI,HR,Logistics ..,this upgrade type also represents an opportunity to maximize the use of SAP standard functionalities by replacing custom modifications and consolidate instance or systems.
Strategic upgrade: Is driven by enterprise SOA to provide more flexibility to business process innovation. This type of upgrade approach represents a significant technology improvements step by leveraging SAP Net weaver functionality to standardize, adapt, and enable new business processes and optimized scenarios.
The major stages of a technical upgrade can be:
System preparation and stack level patch upgrade u2013 Basis Team
SPDD Phase u2013 ABAP and Functionals
Up gradation of the system u2013 Basis Team
SPAU Phase u2013 ABAP and Functionals
DBACOCKPIT for indexing u2013 ABAP TEAM
Unicode check
Issues during upgrade
For Further clarification in this regard, Do let me know.
Hope I have answered your query.
Regards,
Abdur Rafique

OBIEE 10g to 11g Upgrade Project plan

Hello All,
I am a technical consultant working on OBIEE/OBIA and the management needs a project plan for upgrading OBIEE suite 10g to OBIEE 11g (11.1.1.6).
Can you please share some details as -task list and approx hours required. I have a rough idea of task list in terms environment setup, installations, configuration, custom code migration, testing etc. I want present a professional plan that is being followed by others. Dont want to look odd one out. Your help is appriciated.
Thanks you !

See this in the log:
*02712: Expected oracle.biee.admin:type=BIDomain.BIInstance.ServerConfiguration,* Oracle instance, found 0*
You will have to look into why the upgrade utility isnt seeing any instance recognized - it will only work with 1 instance registered and for some reason it cant find any in your configuration.
You could try looking in Oracle® Fusion Middleware Error Messages Reference 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.6.0) for details on the error.
Ensure the service instance name is present in jps-config.xml.

Retrieve all values from project type when project type combo box is null

Hi,
We are facing a tight situation here. We have a scenario where we have 2 filter options.
1) Department ID
2) Project type
When department ID is selected all the department IDs should be populated in the combo box and the project type combo box should be empty.
Similarly, when project type is selected all the project types should be populated in the combo box and the department ID combo box should be empty.
Then, when more than one value is selected from department ID box and all the values from project type must be retrieved from query level (as per business logic).
How do we do this? Kindly help us with this situation.

Basically my situation slightly different.
I am trying to do a bulk insert on SQL Server table using prepared statement, during that time i am getting the exception. I am using JDBC-ODBC driver. However, if i do individual record insertion, it is working.
Any idea about this type of problem ?
Regards
Ramesh

Publication of the big-sized Enterprise projects from Project Professional 2013 to Project Server 2013 takes about 60+ minutes.

Dear Sirs,
I need your support over the following MS EPM 2013 issue:
Publication of the big-sized Enterprise projects from Project Professional 2013 to Project Server 2013 takes about 30+ minutes. We
need to reduce this total publication time down to acceptable working values 10+- minutes.
Environment information:
Single App Server (Virtual): 16 Gb RAM, x64 4xCPU, HDD > 50 GB free disk space, OS Windows Server 2012 Standard Edition x64 Service
Pack 1, MS SharePoint Server 2013 and MS Project Server 2013 with CU December 2013 (KB 2850024) applied.
Single RDBMS MS SQL Server (Virtual): 8 Gb RAM, x64 4xCPU, HDD > 200 GB free space, OS Windows Server 2012 Standard Edition x64 Service
Pack 1, MS SQL Server 2012 x64 SP 1 Enterprise Edition.
We have 1Gbit LAN between APP, DB server and 1Gbit LAN between APP and Proj Prof Client.
Yes, we are on the way of migrating to the Prod environment
with 3-tiered architecture (with SP1 slipstream and CU December 2014 applied), but this issue also
presents there.
Project’s file information:
Tasks in the file: [~4900], resources in the file [~396] enterprise task’s custom fields used in the file [~23].
Project save procedure for this new project would last about 7 minutes. Project publication would last about 47 minutes. We noticed that
tasks synchronization process took about 1 second for each ~2,5 tasks, to add them to the sharepoint tasks list. So for all 5148 tasks it took about 5148/3/60 = 34 minutes. Other 13 min was used for reporting database publication and other tasks relevant
for new sharepoint site creation.
Case 1: Issue description:
During the Enterprise project’s file save and publication we have the following sharepoint 2013 log messages:
07.31.2014 12:43:17.22 Microsoft.Office.Project.Server (0x0358) 0x3D5C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly High Leaving Monitored Scope
(Persisting list changes). performing time =376.068676326181 22dca99c-4696-70f1-e9e2-06851d0bcffd
07.31.2014 12:43:17.69 Microsoft.Office.Project.Server (0x0358) 0x3D5C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly High Leaving Monitored Scope
(Persisting list changes). performing time =361.652807828928 22dca99c-4696-70f1-e9e2-06851d0bcffd
It shows that sharepoint spend at least ~350 milliseconds (or 0,35 sec*4900 tasks = 1715 sec, or 28,5 min) for each task update during
project publication. And we also have another log file that shows that about 0,7 sec (or 0,7 sec*4900 tasks = 3430 sec, or 57 min) sharepoint spend for save each task in project file to project server. So total save and publication time more then 60+ minutes
for that project file. The same result we have even if user didn’t do any changes at the project file.
We use only enterprise projects (dbo.MSP_EpmProject_UserView.projectvisibilitymode = «False»), and do not use sharepoint tasks lists,
but the synchronization between MSP Plan and SharePoint tasks list works at any case.
Case 2: Issue description:
- For the second test we created a new project with new sharepoint project’s site on basis of our «issue» project, with total amount
of tasks in it of 5148 (yes, we increased the tasks list default limit at the sharepoint site up to 6000 items in it – standard limits for sharepoint view list – 5000 items).
- Project save procedure for this new project would last about 7 minutes. Project publication would last about 47 minutes. We noticed
that tasks synchronization process took about 1 second for each ~2,5 tasks, to add them to the sharepoint tasks list. So for all 5148 tasks it took about 5148/3/60 = 34 minutes. Other 13 min was used for reporting database publication and other tasks
relevant for new sharepoint site creation.
-Then we deleted the
tasks list for that new test project from the sharepoint site and republish the project plan one more time. This time project save procedure took about 7 minutes, project publication about 2 minutes and 3 minutes for other relevant queue jobs. So total time
is 12 minutes.
As a conclusion: yes, we have determined
the exact problem - during synchronization process (from Project Server to SharePoint) it perform copying all tasks and related data from Project to SharePoint in spite of fact that you changed only ONE task or ALL of them. At any case, synchronization will
copy ALL of them from Project Server to SharePOint task’s list.
Our workaround is to disable the task’s synchronization for such big-sized project plans:
– to delete the SharePoint «tasks» list at the SharePoint site tied with project plan.
- or deattach the SharePoint site from the project plan.
Thank you for reading this topic, please if you also forced with such issue provide us any known workaround or maybe any official response
\ feedback from MS about it.
Thank you in advance,
Best Regards, Andrey

Regarding my topic, I also said that every time when sync works it updates All items from project’s plan at Project Server to corresponded task’s list at SharePOint server. Inspire of the fact that you changed only One task or group /
all of them at your project’s plan.
And it seems to me and my colleagues that it’s probably (maybe) a “bug” at the product. Here is what we have if looked a little bit closer to the code:
Share Point determines what task to sync from Project’s plan to sharepoint list. To do that sharepoint needs to know was that task changed or not, based on the following fileds (check SQL stored procedure “[MSP_READ_TASKS_FOR_SYNCRONIZATION]”):
TASK_UID    TASK_NAME    TASK_START_DATE    TASK_FINISH_DATE    TASK_PCT_COMP    TASK_PARENT_UID    TASK_OUTLINE_NUM
WSS_LISTITEM_UID   TASK_ID    TASK_IS_ACTIVE
We noticed that at any case synchronization performs for all tasks, EXCEPT the ROOT one. Then we looked at the comparison of TASK_PARENT_UID field. So sharepoint compares TASK_PARENT_UID with ParentID (this is internal name for lookup
field “Tasks” at the Sharepoint, and it stores their values at the format "ID;#Title").
And comparison performs like following:
SharePoint looks for Task at the Tasks’s list corresponded to Project’s plan with ID represented at the TASK_PARENT_UID field. Then it takes SharePoint ListItem ID (“int” type) and store it to the “num” parameter;
num = this.GetCachedListItemByUniqueId(listItem.ParentList, nullable.Value).ID;
2.Then it compares “num” with task’s “ParentID” at SharePOint as follow with operator “!=”:
((SPItem) listItem)["ParentID"] != (System.ValueType) num
3. If comparison was success (true) – then it tell us that values (at the Project’s plan for tasks) was changed, then it need to be synchronized. Corresponded Method setup “true” flag, and then returns it.
The “bug” is that this expression at the Step 2 will always return “true”, because in fact it compares “string” (see above – that this is lookup field at SharePoint side)
with “number”. For example if the parant task ID is “55”, then we get:
"55;#Task 1" != 55
And by the rules of .Net the “string” will never equal “number”
Furthermore this is approved by the SharePoint logs:
In that case we always get the note “Setting ParentID to” at the logs (we see it if turns on Verbose for “Project Server” -> “Sharepoint Integration” category).
So at any case of publishing project’s plan we always get that note at the logs for tasks that have Parent task, and we have Parent for all of them EXCEPT the ROOT one, exact logs represented further:
10/15/2014 02:37:32.26    Microsoft.Office.Project.Server (0x07D8)    0x06E8    Project Server    Sharepoint Integration    ado0d
Verbose    Setting ParentID to 1    bf2fc29c-7727-b00d-fa4a-34f22ea9ec1d 10/15/2014 02:37:32.62    Microsoft.Office.Project.Server (0x07D8)    0x06E8
Project Server    Sharepoint Integration    ado0d    Verbose
Setting ParentID to 1    bf2fc29c-7727-b00d-fa4a-34f22ea9ec1d 10/15/2014 02:37:32.63    Microsoft.Office.Project.Server (0x07D8)    0x06E8    Project Server
Sharepoint Integration    ado0d    Verbose
Setting ParentID to 1    bf2fc29c-7727-b00d-fa4a-34f22ea9ec1d 10/15/2014 02:37:32.67    Microsoft.Office.Project.Server (0x07D8)    0x06E8    Project Server
Sharepoint Integration    ado0d    Verbose
Setting ParentID to 1    bf2fc29c-7727-b00d-fa4a-34f22ea9ec1d 10/15/2014 02:37:32.69    Microsoft.Office.Project.Server (0x07D8)    0x06E8    Project Server
Sharepoint Integration    ado0d    Verbose
Setting ParentID to 5    bf2fc29c-7727-b00d-fa4a-34f22ea9ec1d
The following is the complete Method’s code from the corresponded reflector:
private bool UpdateParentID(DataSet taskDS, DataRow row, SPListItem listItem, Dictionary<Guid, SPListItem> redoEntries)
bool flag = false;
int index = taskDS.Tables[0].DefaultView.Find((object) DataRowExtensions.Field<Guid>(row, "TASK_PARENT_UID"));
if (index >= 0)
Guid? nullable = DataRowExtensions.Field<Guid?>(taskDS.Tables[0].DefaultView[index].Row, "WSS_LISTITEM_UID");
int num = -1;
if (listItem.Fields.ContainsField("ParentID"))
if (nullable.HasValue)
try
// STEP 1
num = this.GetCachedListItemByUniqueId(listItem.ParentList, nullable.Value).ID;
catch (ArgumentException ex)
if (redoEntries != null)
if (!redoEntries.ContainsKey(DataRowExtensions.Field<Guid>(row, "TASK_UID")))
redoEntries.Add(DataRowExtensions.Field<Guid>(row, "TASK_UID"), listItem);
//STEP 2
if (num != -1 && ((SPItem) listItem)["ParentID"] != (System.ValueType) num)
((SPItem) listItem)["ParentID"] = (object) num;
ULS.SendTraceTag(845443U, (ULSCatBase) ULSCat.msoulscat_PS_ProjectSharepointIntegration, ULSTraceLevel.Verbose, "Setting ParentID to {0}", new object[1]
((SPItem) listItem)["ParentID"]
//STEP 3
flag = true;
else if (((SPItem) listItem)["ParentID"] != null)
((SPItem) listItem)["ParentID"] = (object) null;
ULS.SendTraceTag(2495056U, (ULSCatBase) ULSCat.msoulscat_PS_ProjectSharepointIntegration, ULSTraceLevel.Verbose, "Resetting ParentID to null");
flag = true;
return flag;
Any thoughts about it would be much appreciated!

About Tcode of project type in upgrade project

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for